Patent Application
20220106604
The present invention generally relates to the field of improving traits in plants. More particularly, the present invention relates to improving flower yield in Cannabis plants using the CRISPR/Cas genome editing approach.
The Cannabis market is enjoying an unprecedented spike in activity following the wide spread legalization trend across the world. It is estimated that the American market alone would reach a value of at least $30B by 2025, with an exceptional growth rate of 30% per annum. This has led to an increase in demand not only for Cannabis products in general but in particular for products with very specific traits, be it medicinal or recreational use. That demand at times meets a lacking supply, for numerous varied reasons. To allow profitability, growers must leave the environmentally controlled indoor grow facility and go out to the greenhouse or field. Under greenhouse and field conditions, plant performance, for example in terms of growth, development, biomass accumulation and yield, depends on a plant's tolerance and acclimation ability to numerous environmental conditions, changes and stresses. Thus, this transition from the indoor to the outdoor poses several obstacles to growers, and a central such hurdle is achieving consistent high yield.
Numerous avenues have been put forward by inventors and scientists around the world in an attempt to improve Cannabis yield, including photoacoustic energy (US20180127327A1), light (intensity, wavelength, directionality; US20160184237A1, CA2958257C) or transgenic plants with specific traits transformed (U.S. Pat. No. 8,344,205B2).
However, the Cannabis cultivation community has only recently began adopting hard science and the gradual shift from traditional cultivation methods to modern, science-based techniques is still in its infancy. The most acute scientific deficiency in that regard is the lack of fully developed and robust genetics of Cannabis sativa, a shortcoming which hinders the availability and use of genetically enhanced seeds. Without a rapid adoption of genetic tools it is unlikely that Cannabis growers would be able to both meet demand as well as turn a profit, since commercial competition has significantly cut revenues per grower while traditional cultivation measures fail to increase yield in order to compensate for said losses. Further still, the unstable nature of the Cannabis product generated by traditional methods prevents users from enjoying a stable and consistent product, one that would fit particular needs of different consumers. However, big agro companies have yet to jump on the Cannabis wagon due to its still tremulous legal standing.
Since Cannabis cultivation has been illegal for many decades, and only recently has been partially legalized, it still predominantly relies on traditional horticultural techniques, methods, and traditions. These growing practices severely lack scientific rigor and are not suitable for the transition into large-scale Cannabis production. The most flagrant lacuna characterizing this lax scientific approach is the absence of genetic data and tools. Further still, scientists and inventors have so far focused their gaze on improving the production of cannabinoids (WO2018035450A1) rather than ameliorating the physiological parameters of the Cannabis sativa plant as a whole. As a caveat one must acknowledge the fact that attempts have been made in the transgenic front within the context of improving crop yield in general. However, considering the fact that Cannabis users are wearier than others about the GMO status of their product, the insertion of foreign DNA into the Cannabis plant in that fashion may deter a considerable portion of the potential market from such transgenic products. Furthermore, while the emphasis given to cannabinoids is predictable and understandable, neglecting the whole plant physiology is a major hindrance to the industry's ability to meet the growing market demand.
In light of the above, it is the aim of the present invention to provide a novel method of effectively and consistently increasing yield of a transgene-free Cannabis plant. The method is based on gene editing of the Cannabis plant genome at a specific nucleic acid sequence, which results in a set of desired traits which ameliorate the flowering process.
The challenge here is to efficiently induce precise and predictable targeted point mutations pivotal to the flowering process in the cannabis plant using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.
A significant added value of gene editing is that it does not qualify as genetic modification so the resultant transgene-free plant will therefore be not considered a GMO plant/product, at the least in the USA. While the exact and operational definition of genetically modified is hotly debated and contested, it is generally agreed upon and accepted that genetic modification refers to plants and animals that have been altered in a way that wouldn't have arisen naturally through evolution. The clearest and most obvious example is a transgenic organism whose genome now incorporates a gene from another species inserted to bestow a novel trait to that organism, such as pest resistance. The situation is different with CRISPR, as it is not necessarily integrated into the plant genome, and is used as a gene editing tool which allows to directly mutate the organism's genetic code. There is therefore a long felt unmet need to provide Cannabis strains with increased yields.
It is therefore one object of the present invention to disclose a method for increasing yield in Cannabis plants selected from the group consisting of C. sativa, C. indica, and C. ruderalis, comprising steps of;
It is a further object of the present invention to disclose the method as defined above, wherein the gene involved in the flowering pathways of said Cannabis species is selected from the group consisting of CsSFT1, CsSFT2, CsSFT3, CsSPGB, CsMultiflora, CsJumonji, CsBif1 and CsBif2; and detailed in the file titled “3309_1_3_SEQ_LISTING”. It is a further object of the present invention to disclose the method as defined above, wherein the gRNAs and their corresponding protospacer adjacent motif (PAMs) are selected from a group consisting of CsSFT1, CsSFT2, CsSFT3, CsSPGB, CsMultiflora, CsJumonji, CsBif1 and CsBif2 and detailed in the file titled “3309_1_3_SEQ_LISTING”. It is a further object of the present invention to disclose the method as defined above, wherein the target domain sequence is selected from the group comprising of: 1) a nucleic acid sequence encoding the polypeptide of CsSFT1 (2) a nucleic acid sequence comprising the sequence of CsSFT2, (3) a nucleic acid sequence encoding the polypeptide of CsSFT3,
(4) a nucleic acid sequence encoding the polypeptide of CsSPGB (5) a nucleic acid sequence encoding the polypeptide of CsMultiflora (6) a nucleic acid sequence encoding the polypeptide of CsJumonji (7) a nucleic acid sequence encoding the polypeptide of CsBif1 (8) a nucleic acid sequence encoding the polypeptide of CsBif2, (9) a nucleic acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity to at least 200 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of CsSFT1, (10) a nucleic acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity to at least 200 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of CsSFT2, (11) a nucleic acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity to at least 200 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of CsSFT3, (12) a nucleic acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity to at least 200 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of CsSPGB, (13) a nucleic acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity to at least 200 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of CsMultiflora, (14) a nucleic acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity to at least 200 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of CsJumonji, (15) a nucleic acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity to at least 200 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of CsBif1 (16) a nucleic acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity to at least 200 contiguous nucleotides of the nucleic acid sequence of CsBif2.
It is a further object of the present invention to disclose the method as defined above, wherein the transformation is carried out using Agrobacterium to deliver an expression cassette comprised of a) a selection marker, b) a nucleotide sequence encoding one or more gRNA molecules comprising a DNA sequence which is complementary with a target domain sequence selected from the group pf genes comprised of CsSFT1, CsSFT2, CsSFT3, CsSPGB, CsMultiflora, CsJumonji, CsBif1 and CsBif2, and c) a nucleotide sequence encoding a Cas molecule from, but not limited to Streptococcus pyogenes or Staphylococcus aureus.
It is a further object of the present invention to disclose the method as defined above, wherein the method comprises administering a nucleic acid composition that comprises: a) a first nucleotide sequence encoding the gRNA molecule and b) a second nucleotide sequence encoding the Cas molecule.
It is a further object of the present invention to disclose the method as defined above, wherein the CRISPR/Cas system is delivered to the cell by a plant virus. It is a further object of the present invention to disclose the method as defined above, wherein the Cas protein is selected from a group comprising but not limited to Cpf1, Cas9, Cas12, Cas13, Cas14, CasX or CasY.
It is a further object of the present invention to disclose the method as defined above, wherein increasing Cannabis yield comprising steps of:
It is a further object of the present invention to disclose the method as defined above, wherein the RNA-guided endonuclease is derived from a clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) system. It is a further object of the present invention to disclose the method as defined above, wherein the introduction of CsSFT1, CsSFT2, CsSFT3, CsSPGB, CsMultiflora, CsJumonji, CsBif1 and CsBif2 does not insert exogenous genetic material and produces a non-naturally occurring Cannabis plant or cell thereof.
It is a further object of the present invention to disclose the method as defined above, wherein increasing Cannabis yield comprises;
It is a further object of the present invention to disclose the method as defined above, wherein increasing said Cannabis yield is selected from a group consisting of: increasing the number of flowers, increasing the size of the flowers, increasing the weight of the flowers, increasing the number of buds, increasing the size of the buds, increasing the weight of the buds and any combination thereof.
It is a further object of the present invention to disclose a method for increasing yield in Cannabis plants selected from a group consisting of C. sativa, C. indica, and C. ruderalis, comprising steps of;
It is a further object of the present invention to disclose the method as defined above, wherein the editing is executed by means selected from a group consisting of: CRISPR/Cas, cleaving the genome of said cell using zinc finger nucleases, cleaving the genome of said cell using meganucleases (homing endonucleases), cleaving the genome of said cell using transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN), and any combination thereof.
It is therefore another object of the present invention to disclose a Cannabis plant produced by the method described above;
It is therefore another object of the present invention to disclose a Cannabis seed of the plant of described above.
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention.
The nucleic and/or amino acid sequences provided herewith are shown using standard letter abbreviations for nucleotide bases, and three letter code for amino acids, as defined in 37 C.F.R. 1.822. Only one strand of each nucleic acid sequence is shown, but the complementary strand is understood as included by any reference to the displayed strand. The Sequence Listing is submitted as an ASCII text file named 3309_1_3_SEQ_LISTING.txt, created Dec. 19, 2021, about 299 KB, which is incorporated by reference herein.
The following description is provided, so as to enable any person skilled in the art to make use of the invention and sets forth the best modes contemplated by the inventor of carrying out this invention. Various modifications, however, are adapted to remain apparent to those skilled in the art, since the generic principles of the present invention have been defined specifically to provide a method for increasing flower yield in Cannabis plants.
Introduction to Terms and Explanations Used in the Disclosure of the Present Invention:
The present invention disclosed herein provides a method for producing a plant with increased yield as compared to a corresponding wild type plant comprising increasing or generating one or more activities in a plant or a part thereof. The present invention provides plant cells with enhanced or improved traits of a gene-edited plant, plants comprising such cells, progeny, seed and pollen derived from such plants, and methods of making and methods of using such plant cell(s) or plant(s), progeny, seed(s) or pollen. Particularly, said improved trait(s) are manifested in an increased yield, preferably by improving one or more yield-related trait(s) number of flowers per plant, number of flowering buds per plant, flower weight, total flower yield per m2.
Heterosis and Crop Yield
Heterosis (aka hybrid vigor or outbreeding enhancement) defines the enhanced function (or vigor) of a biological trait in a hybrid offspring. An offspring is heterotic if its traits are enhanced as a result of mixing (Mendelian or not) the genetic contributions of its parents. In crop breeding, this kind of outbreeding has come to generally mean a higher-yielding and a more robust plant under cultivation conditions (but not necessarily in the wild), Two non-mutually exclusive yet competing hypotheses have been proposed to account for this tendency of outbred strains to exceed both inbred parents in fitness. According to the dominance hypothesis, the enhanced vigor stems from the suppression of undesirable recessive alleles from one parent by dominant alleles from the other. Dominance assumes complementation, i.e. that crossing two strains of a plant, carrying different homozygous recessive mutations that produce the same mutant phenotype, will produce offspring with the wild-type phenotype. This will occur only if the mutations are in different genes such that strain's genome complements the mutated allele of one strain with a wild type allele of the other (since the mutations are recessive).
According to the overdominance hypothesis, certain combinations of alleles that can be obtained by crossing two inbred strains are advantageous in the heterozygote. Thus, a heterozygote provides an advantage to the survival of deleterious alleles in homozygotes and the high fitness of heterozygous genotypes favors the persistence of an allelic polymorphism in the population. The overdominance model states that intralocus allelic interactions at one or more heterozygous genes lead to increased vigor. Theoretically, overdominance requires only a single heterozygous gene to achieve heterosis.
Under dominance, few genes should be under-expressed in the heterozygous offspring compared to the parents. Furthermore, for any given gene, the expression should be comparable to the one observed in the fitter of the two parents. However, under overdominance, there should be an over-expression of certain genes in the heterozygous offspring compared to the homozygous parents.
Krieger et al. (2010) were first to document an example of overdominance at a locus for yield and suggest that single heterozygous mutations may indeed improve crop productivity. The authors report a robust heterozygosity, under various environmental conditions, for the tomato SFT (single flower truss) gene (the genetic originator of the flowering hormone florigen), increased yield by ˜60%. Florigen is a systemic signal for the transition to flowering in plants. Florigen is produced in the leaves, and acts in the shoot apical meristem of buds and growing tips. It is graft-transmissible, and even functions between species. The florigen cascade pathway is initiated by the production of a mRNA coding transcription factor CONSTANS (CO). CO mRNA is produced approximately 12 hours after dawn and then translated into CO protein. CO protein is stable only in light and promotes transcription of another gene called Flowering Locus T (FT). Thus, FT can be produced only on long days. FT is then transported via the phloem to the shoot apical meristem. There, FT interacts with a transcription factor (FD protein) to activate floral identity genes and induce flowering. The authors concluded that several traits integrate pleiotropically to drive heterosis in a multiplicative manner, and that these effects derive from a suppression of growth termination mediated by the SP (self-pruning) gene, an antagonist of SFT.
Self-pruning (SP) genes are Florigen paralog and flowering repressors that control the regularity of the vegetative-reproductive switch during sympodial growth along the compound shoot of tomato and thus conditions the ‘determinate’ (sp/sp) and ‘indeterminate’ (SP) growth habits of the plant. In wild-type ‘indeterminate’ plants, inflorescences are separated by three vegetative nodes. In ‘determinate’ plants homozygous for the recessive allele of the Self-pruning (SP) gene, by two consecutive inflorescences. SP is a development regulator homologous to the Flowering locus T (FT) gene in Arabidopsis. SP is a gene family in tomato composed of at least six genes. The G-box (CACGTG) is a ubiquitous, cis-acting DNA regulatory element found in plant genomes. G-box factors (GBFs) bind to G-boxes in a context-specific manner, mediating a wide variety of gene expression patterns. SPGB (Self-pruning G-box) has been shown to interact with the tomato SP protein and the SFT protein.
Jumonji-C (JmjC) proteins play important roles in plant growth and development, particularly in regulating circadian clock and period length. The first plant JmjC genes characterized were involved in the flowering cascade, either as floral activators or repressors.
Bifurcate flower truss (bif) is a mutant tomato gene which leads to a significant increase in the number of branches per truss and flower number. Bif shows a significant interaction with exposure to low temperature during truss development.
Gene Editing
Mutation breeding refers to a host of techniques designed to rapidly and effectively induce desired or remove unwanted traits via artificial mutations in a target organism. Gene editing is such a mutation breeding tool which offers significant advantages over genetic modification. Genetic modification is a molecular technology involving inserting a DNA sequence of interest, coding for a desirable trait, into an organism's genome. Gene editing is a mutation breeding tool which allows precise modification of the genome. It works when molecular scissors (a protein complex from the Cas family) are precisely directed toward an exact genome locus using a guide RNA, and then incise the genome at that site.
One advantage to using the CRISPR/Cas system over genetic modification is that Cas family proteins are easily programmed to make a DNA double strand break (DSB) in any desirable locus. The initial cut is followed by repairing chromosomal DSBs. There are two major cellular repair pathways in that respect: Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and Homology directed repair (HDR). This invention concerns itself with NHEJ which is active throughout the cell cycle and has a higher capacity for repair, as there is no requirement for a repair template (sister chromatid or homologue) or extensive DNA synthesis. NHEJ also finishes repair of most types of breaks in tens of minutes—an order of magnitude faster than HDR. NHEJ-mediated repair of DSBs is useful if the intent is to make a null allele (knockout) in a gene of interest, as it is prone to generating indel errors. Indel errors generated in the course of repair by NHEJ are typically small (1-10 bp) but extremely heterogeneous. There is consequently about a two-thirds chance of causing a frameshift mutation. Of some importance, the deletion can be less heterogeneous when constrained by sequence identities in flanking sequence (microhomologies).
Additionally, there is no foreign DNA left over in the plant after selection for plants which contain the desired editing event and do not carry the CRISPR/Cas machinery. This significant advantage has allowed gene editing to be viewed by many (though not all) legal systems around the world as GMO-free.
Significant advances have been made recently in an attempt to more efficiently target and cleave genomic DNA by site specific nucleases [e.g. zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), meganucleases, transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENS)]. More recently, RNA-guided endonucleases (RGENs) have been introduced, and they are directed to their target sites by a complementary RNA molecule. These systems have a DNA-binding domain that localizes the nuclease to a target site. The site is then cut by the nuclease. These systems are used to induce targeted mutagenesis, induce targeted deletions of cellular DNA sequences, and facilitate targeted recombination of an exogenous donor DNA polynucleotide within a predetermined genomic locus. Most notable and successful of RGENs is Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated nuclease (CRISPR/Cas) with an engineered crRNA/tracr RNA. CRISPR/Cas9 are cognates that find each other on the target DNA.
The CRISPR-Cas9 system has rapidly become a tool of choice in gene editing because it is faster, cheaper, more accurate, and more efficient than other available RGENs. This system was adapted from a naturally occurring genome editing system in bacteria designed to produce viral resistance such that bacteria capture snippets of DNA from invading viruses and use them to create DNA segments known as CRISPR arrays. The CRISPR arrays allow the bacteria to “remember” the viruses (or closely related ones). If the viruses attack again, the bacteria produce RNA segments from the CRISPR arrays to target the viruses' DNA. The bacteria then use Cas9 or a similar enzyme to cut the DNA, which disables the virus. In lab conditions, scientists create a small piece of RNA with a short “guide” sequence (gRNA) that binds to a specific target sequence of DNA in a genome. The RNA also binds to the Cas9 enzyme. As in bacteria, the modified RNA is used to recognize the DNA sequence, and the Cas9 enzyme cuts the DNA at the targeted location. Although Cas9 is the enzyme that is used most often, other enzymes (for example Cpf1) can also be used. Once the DNA is cut, the cell's own DNA repair machinery add or delete pieces of genetic material resulting in mutation.
Ribonucleoprotein Protein Complex (RNP)
Ribonucleoprotein protein complex is formed when a Cas protein is incubated with gRNA molecules and then transformed into cells in order to induce editing events in the cell. RNP's can be delivered using biolistics.
Biolistics
Biolistics is a method for the delivery of nucleic acid and or proteins to cells by high-speed particle bombardment. The technique uses a pressurized gun (gene gun) to forcibly propel a payload comprised of an elemental particle of a heavy metal coated with plasmid DNA to transform plant cellular organelles. After the DNA-carrying vector has been delivered, the DNA is used as a template for transcription and sometimes it integrates into a plant chromosome (“stable” transformation). If the vector also delivered a selectable marker, then stably transformed cells can be selected and cultured. Transformed plants can become totipotent and even display novel and heritable phenotypes.
The skeletal biolistic vector design includes not only the desired gene to be inserted into the cell, but also promoter and terminator sequences as well as a reporter gene used to enable the ensuing detection and removal cells which failed to incorporate the exogenous DNA. In addition to DNA, the use of a Cas9 protein and a gRNA molecule could be used for biolistic delivery. The advantage of using a protein and a
RNA molecule is that the complex initiates editing upon reaching the cell nucleus: when using DNA for editing the DNA first has to be transcribed in the nucleus but when using RNA for editing, RNA is translated already in the cytoplasm. This forces the Cas protein to shuttle back to the nucleus, find the relevant guides and only then can editing be achieved.
As used herein, the term “CRISPR” refers to an acronym that means Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats of DNA sequences. CRISPR is a series of repeated DNA sequences with unique DNA sequences in between the repeats. RNA transcribed from the unique strands of DNA serves as guides for directing cleaving. CRISPR is used as a gene editing tool. In one embodiment, CRISPR is used in conjunction with (but not limited to) Cpf1, Cas9, Cas12, Cas13, Cas14, CasX or CasY.
As used herein, the term “transformation” refers to the deliberate insertion of genetic material into plant cells. In one embodiment transformation is executed using, but not limited to, bacteria and/or viruses. In another embodiment, transformation is executed via biolistics using, but not limited to, DNA or RNPs.
As used herein, the term “Cas” refers to CRISPR associated proteins that act as enzymes cutting the genome at specific sequences. Cas9 refers to a specific group of proteins known in the art. RNA molecules direct various classes of Cas enzymes to cut a certain sequence found in the genome. In one embodiment, the CRISPR/Cas9 system cleaves one or two chromosomal strands at known DNA sequence. In one embodiment, one of the two chromosomal strands is mutated. In one embodiment, two of the two chromosomal strands are mutated.
As used herein, the term “chromosomal strand” refers to a sequence of DNA within the chromosome. When the CRISPR/Cas9 system cleaves the chromosomal strands, the strands are cut leaving the possibility of one or two strands being mutated, either the template strand or coding strand.
As used herein, the term “PAM” (protospacer adjacent motif) refers to a targeting component of the transformation expression cassette which is a very short (2-6 base pair) DNA sequence immediately following the DNA sequence targeted by the Cas9 nuclease in the CRISPR system.
Within the context of this disclosure, other examples of endonuclease enzymes include, but are not limited to, Cpf1, Cas9, Cas12, Cas13, Cas14, CasX or CasY.
The invention is characterized by a plurality of embodiments in which gRNAs direct the CRISPR/Cas system to cleave chromosomal strands coding for various genes (CsBif1, CsBif2, CsJumonji, CsMultiflora, CsSFT1, CsSFT2, CsSFT3 and CsSPGB). The full genomic sequences of these various genes are all documented in the seq.listing file, listed as SEQ ID NOs: SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID NO:171, SEQ ID NO:390, SEQ ID NO:726, SEQ ID NO:936, SEQ ID NO:1015, SEQ ID NO:1106 and SEQ ID NO:1335.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the coding sequences (CDS) of the above genes are all documented in the seq.listing file, listed as SEQ ID NOs: SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:172, SEQ ID NO:391, SEQ ID NO:727, SEQ ID NO:937, SEQ ID NO:1016, SEQ ID NO:1107 and SEQ ID NO:1336.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the amino acids (AA) sequences of the proteins translated from the above genes are all documented in the seq.listing file, listed as SEQ ID NOs: SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:173, SEQ ID NO:392, SEQ ID NO:728, SEQ ID NO:938, SEQ ID NO:1017, SEQ ID NO:1108 and SEQ ID NO:1337.
The invention is further characterized by a plurality of embodiments in which gRNAs of a given sequence are paired with a specific complementary PAMs. These gRNAs are all documented in full in Tables 1-8, and in the seq.listing file listed as SEQ ID Nos: SEQ ID NOs:4-170 (for CsBif1), SEQ ID NOs:174-389 (for CsBif2), SEQ ID NOs:393-725 (for CsJumonji), SEQ ID NOs: 729-935 (for CsMultiflora), SEQ ID NOs: 939-1014 (for CsSFT1), SEQ ID NOs: 1018-1105 (for CsSFT2), SEQ ID NOs: 1109-1334 (for CsSFT3) and SEQ ID NOs: 1338-1500 (for Cs SPGB).
Example 1: A generalized scheme of the process for generating genome edited plants Reference is now made to
Legend to
+RNP (digested DNA); (3) Sample 2 PCR (no DNA digest) product; (4): Sample 2 PCR product+RNP (digested DNA); (M) marker.
Reference is now made to the following tables presenting non-binding examples of gRNA sequences of the Cannabis sativa genes disclosed in this application, and their respective position, strand and PAM (protospacer adjacent motif).
The aim of the example was to introduce a mutation in the Multiflora gene, thereby inhibiting the expression of the multiflora protein. This may potentially increase the yield of flower in cannabis plants, by causing the plant to produce more flowers.
The Multiflora gene was mutated via CRISPR/Cas-9 system. Cannabis plants were transformed using Agrobacterium tumefaciens containing a binary plasmid harboring the Cas-9 gene and a gRNA expression cassette. Plant tissue samples were collected 10-14 days post transformation and DNA was extracted. The DNA was then used to perform PCR using specific primers (Fw 5-GGCGATTCCTGTTGCGGGTT-3 Rv 5-ATGAGAGGAGTCCGGAGCCG-3) flanking relevant guide sequences after which the PCR product was analyzed by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) to identify editing events.
Editing of the Multiflora gene was carried out by use of the gRNA set forth as SEQ ID NO 750 (also referenced in Table 4, position 624). SEQ ID NO 750 was specifically chosen for use, since it is located at the beginning of the gene, and a mutation therein will lead to a stop codon, inhibiting the protein's expression. Base pairs were inserted by random, non-homologous insertion. Amplicon sequencing was executed at 100,000 reads per sample and analyzed to identify editing events. 95% of amplicons had the original Wild Type (WT) sequence while 1.8% had an “A” insertion at the 4th position upstream to the PAM, 1.1% had an “C” insertion and 0.7% had an “T” insertion at the same position, set forth as SEQ ID Nos. 1501, 1502, and 1503, respectively.
This is a Continuation in Part (CIP) of International Application No. PCT/IL2020/050683 filed Jun. 18, 2020; which in turn claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/863,279, filed Jun. 19, 2019. The contents of the foregoing patent applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62863279 | Jun 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/IL2020/050683 | Jun 2020 | US |
| Child | 17555540 | US |
