1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates a method for loading revolver guns, in particular remotely controlled revolver guns, in time with or depending on the firing rate.
2. Description of the Background Art
Fundamentally, revolver guns are known. They are used, not exclusively, but preferably, in the medium-calibre range. As soon as a gun is not required to be ready for use, the gun is generally unloaded. This means that the ammunition chambers in the revolver drum do not contain any ammunition, that is to say they are empty. This requirement is upheld for safety reasons, according to which it is in every case necessary to avoid ammunition being fired inadvertently, resulting in damage to the gun or danger to the surrounding area. Considered over the entire life, a gun is, of course, predominantly in this unloaded state. Revolver guns therefore always have to be loaded first of all in order to reach operational or firing readiness. This is done by feeding cartridges in steps from the ammunition feed to the firing position in the gun such that at least the cartridge chamber which is in the firing position contains a cartridge in that cartridge chamber. The known medium-calibre range revolver guns are loaded either manually, pneumatically, hydraulically or else electrically.
In this case, step-by-step loading is dependent on the number of cartridge chambers. In the case of a weapon having four cartridge chambers, this means that three loading processes take place. For each loading step, a control slide is accelerated by a hydraulic loading apparatus for this purpose. This hydraulic loading apparatus moves to the rear limit position and is pushed back again by the closing springs. The revolver drum is rotated synchronously through 90° by the control cam in the control slide, and the drum carries out a loading cycle. In an initial position, a round is located in an ammunition feed which generally has no belt links, and is fed from this into a gun feeder. The first cartridge is thus located at the initial position in the feeder and can be gripped by the gun cartridge slide. The first cartridge is then pushed further onto the rotor (drum shaft) by the star wheels of the feeder, and half of it is pushed by the cartridge slide into the upper cartridge chamber (which is referred to as the 12 o'clock position) in the drum. This first cartridge is rotated further on the rotor and is pushed by the cartridge slide completely into the cartridge chamber which is now located at the 9 o'clock position. During the subsequent 90° drum rotation, the cartridge chamber with the first cartridge is rotated further to the 6 o'clock firing position. In this case, the breech block in the weapon housing is positioned behind the cartridge, and locks it. The weapon is thus loaded and is ready to fire. One known hydraulic loading apparatus can carry out the three required loading processes in 1 to about 2 seconds, thus loading the gun within this time.
Loading processes such as these are particularly time-consuming. A further characteristic of the loading process of these weapons is that the loading process must be carried out a very long time before use. Furthermore, an assessment must be made that the use of the weapon is to be expected at a later time. This assessment is subject to uncertainty and requires extensive planning activities. It is therefore necessary to decide in good time when the weapon will be changed from the safety-non-critical (SAFE) state to the critical (CHARGED) state. In this state, more stringent requirements must be applied to the operation and safety devices of the weapon than in the SAFE state. For example, the rights of the operator to work, carry out maintenance and to remain in the vicinity of the weapon are then greatly restricted. The weapon is therefore in a state other than the generally desirable SAFE state for a relatively long time period. If, when in use, and contrary to expectation and contrary to the preparatory loading activities, the weapon is then not used, the weapon must be unloaded again, because of the fundamentally known safety aspects. This involves an additional time penalty. This is because the weapon is returned to the SAFE state only after being unloaded.
As is known, in some cases, the ammunition being fed and carried away during the loading/unloading process is subject to severe mechanical loads. Since it is normally not possible, when in the usage phase in field conditions, to test which parts of the unloaded ammunition have been excessively mechanically severely loaded and which parts of the ammunition have been only sufficiently lightly loaded that they would still be serviceable for future use, all the cartridges which have been unloaded are disposed of irrespective of the level to which they have actually been loaded. This leads to high costs.
DE 10 2007 046 545 A1, which corresponds to U.S. Pat. No. 8,225,999, and which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses a method for controlling the firing sequence of a machine gun, in which the firing sequence is modified such that the time interval between adjacent shot initiations is alternately reduced or increased, with the desired firing rate being created overall, in order to prevent resonant oscillations of the weapon barrel.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method for loading revolving guns, which complies with considerably more stringent safety standards while at the same time being cost-effective.
In an embodiment, the invention is based on the idea of speeding up the operation of the known loading apparatus and of linking the loading process to the operation of the trigger at the same time. In this case, the loading process is speeded up such that the, for example three, loading movements in the case of a four-chamber drum are carried out, for example, in a time of between one and a few tenths of a second. Ideally, the steps in the loading process are carried out at a rate which is approximately or is the same as the normal firing rate of the gun. This process is known as loading in time with the firing rate. During the last loading process, the trigger is operated or released, such that fire is opened without any delay after loading.
It is proposed that the revolver drum be allowed to rotate at least approximately at a rate which corresponds to the normal firing rate of the weapon. When a predetermined loading step is reached, the weapon trigger is operated such that fire can be opened essentially without any delay. Firing initiation takes place without any deterioration in the operational conditions, the operational readiness being achieved very quickly overall. In this case, the loading process is carried out in an extremely short time which does not significantly prolong the reaction time for firing the weapon, thus allowing the loading process to be carried out only when fire is actually opened. The weapon is fired without any pause immediately after (with) the loading process. At the same time, that is to say only immediately before firing, the weapon is changed from the SAFE state to the CHARGED state, thus considerably improving the safety standards of the weapon. The time in which the weapon is ready for use and ready to fire and not in the SAFE state is limited to a minimum or becomes zero, thus leading to a considerable improvement in operational safety. Lengthening the time in the SAFE state allows a greater test depth (for example for the trigger) for the weapon, which in turn results in higher weapon reliability.
Since the weapon is now loaded only when fire is actually opened, there is no need to anticipate ammunition losses resulting from ammunition being damaged during the loading/unloading process. Undesirable mechanical loading of the unloaded ammunition is completely avoided, thus avoiding costly disposal.
The method allows a remotely controlled, and automatic and rapid loading process, which can be used even in unmanned guns and gun turrets (for example in the case of naval guns or weapon stations on vehicles/platforms etc.).
Further scope of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings which are given by way of illustration only, and thus, are not limitive of the present invention, and wherein:
The firing rate of known revolver guns is in the range from several hundred to more than a thousand shots per minute. The loading process in time with the firing rate between the times t1 and t2 accordingly takes place in a time period of considerably less than one second, in particular in the range from ¼ to ⅓ second. This delay between the fire command and the firing of the first cartridge is short, and can easily be integrated in the fire control computation for the overall gun by, for example, correction of the lead parameters, the elevation or the azimuth angle, and also the initiation time for break-up or explosive ammunition.
In the case in which the weapon is not used, that is to say no fire command is initiated (not illustrated), the weapon remains permanently in the SAFE state. The less stringent safety requirements for the SAFE state can therefore be maintained and, furthermore, there is no longer any need to unload unused ammunition from the weapon, and then to dispose of it at high cost.
In a further embodiment of the method as shown in
When required at all, the weapon need be unloaded only when a fire command with the weapon being fired has previously been given. This occurs considerably less often than the production of firing and operational readiness as in the prior art, thus resulting in considerable ammunition and cost savings here.
In a further advantageous embodiment of the method as shown in
The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are to be included within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
DE102011017117.7 | Apr 2011 | DE | national |
This nonprovisional application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/EP2012/055201, which was filed on Mar. 23, 2012, and which claims priority to German Patent Application No. DE 10 2011 017 117.7, which was filed in Germany on Apr. 14, 2011, and which are both herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2012/055201 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14054222 | US |