This invention meets the need for anti-personnel rounds to deliver greater lethal effect and more robust structural integrity compared to traditional rounds within a given caliber size. This goal has been a potential area of improvement since high explosive antipersonnel rounds were first adopted, but it was brought to the forefront when there was a requirement for ammunition to perforate urban targets and provide increased anti-personnel effectiveness. Some existing approaches to achieving desired performance prior to this invention had been: naturally fragmenting steel, enhanced fragmentation steel, and matrixed fragmentation caps. However, naturally fragmenting steel and enhanced fragmentation steel approaches did not provide a large enough area of effect to satisfy the desired requirements. Matrixed fragmentation caps were previously unable to be attached in such a way as to survive impact with the required wall targets, and also limited in the volume that they could be allowed to take up in the warheads overall space. This was due to the fact that they could not include sufficiently adequate or numerous structural members.
This invention allows preformed fragments, tailored in size, shape, and material, to be embedded in a close packing density within a matrix of a chosen material that is integrally bonded onto the exterior profile of a warhead. These preformed fragments offer increased lethality when compared to a steel warhead. The inherent steel underbody and integral bonding method offers improved structural integrity and increased flexibility in preform placement when compared to prior matrixed fragmentation cap methods.
The components for fabricating the composite fragmentation cap integrally bonded to the projectile underbody include a hot isostatic pressing (HIP) canister 1, a steel underbody 2, selected fragmentation preforms 4, powdered binder material 5, welded canister sealing caps 6, and a welded vacuum stem 7.
Ammunition design practices must be used to achieve desired performance by determining required underbody geometry and material, binder material, cap geometry, preform size, shape, packing density, and material selection. The ammunition design engineer must balance resulting mass properties, structural integrity, ballistic performance, terminal lethality, cost, and manufacturing limitations to arrive at a final design. Likewise, casing material selection, caliber, shape, interior explosive volume, subcomponent interface, next level assembly constraints and conditions, costs and manufacturing limitations are designed and engineered to satisfy operational needs.
Inherent in the composite warhead design are considerations of structural integrity, lethality, and ballistic performance. The steel underbody is the primary driver of structural integrity, though the fragmentation cap does offer some structural support. Similarly, the fragmentation cap (including the decisions as to preform size, shape, and material) is the primary driver of lethal effect, but the steel underbody does provide some lethal effect. Ballistic performance is driven by inertial properties of the overall composite part, as well as the profile and surface of any fragmentation cap and/or underbody regions that are in the airstream.
The underbody's outer profile is cut onto a cylinder of the desired underbody material; the resulting part is effectively used as a mandrel. The underbody mandrel is then placed in a canister whose inner diameter matches the outer diameter of the underbody mandrel's cylindrical section. The remaining cavity within the canister is then filled with a homogeneous mixture of fragmentation preforms and binder powder. In order to improve chemical bond between underbody and cap, it is desired that a binder material be chosen that is miscible with the underbody material. It is theorized that greater miscibility between fragmentation preform material and binder material will cause greater structural integrity of the fragmentation cap but poorer lethal fragmentation performance.
After the underbody mandrel is placed in the canister and the remaining cavity is filled with cap materials, the canister is closed off and welded shut. A vacuum is then drawn, under a prescribed heating cycle, through the stem in order to remove any gas in the powder that would cause irregularities during the hot isostatic pressing (HIP) process. After degassing is complete, the stem is pinched and welded closed in order to seal the canister.
The contained processing assembly is then placed inside a hot isostatic press. The hot isostatic press is then heated and pressurized to a pre-determined maximum pressure and maximum temperature for the selected binder powder material. At an elevated temperature below the melting point of the canister and underbody materials, a pressurized inert gas such as argon consolidates the canister and its contents. The high temperature, high pressure operation turns the powdered metal binder into a solid piece near the theoretical maximum density of the material. The chosen fragmentation preforms are thereby embedded within a solid matrix of the binder material. Processing parameters (time, temperature, pressure, etc.) are as prescribed for the binder material and desired resultant product.
After cooling, the top and bottom lids are cut and the canister is machined from the consolidated piece. The integrated compacted billet is then final machined to the desired size and profile of the projectile body design.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a process for making a fragmentation warhead resulting in a finished warhead with an enhanced performance fragmentation cap integrally bonded to it.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a process for making a fragmentation warhead using hot isostatic pressing where tungsten spheres, powdered steel, and interlock features on a mandrel are consolidated in a matrix.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a process for producing a fragmentation warhead where tungsten spheres, powdered steel, and interlock features on a mandrel are consolidated in a matrix and where in the finished part, rear and interior geometries are machined, resulting in a finished warhead with an enhanced performance fragmentation cap integrally bonded to it.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become more apparent in view of the within detailed descriptions of the invention, the claims, and in light of the following drawings and/or tables wherein reference numerals may be reused where appropriate to indicate a correspondence between the referenced items. It should be understood that the sizes and shapes of the different components in the figures may not be in exact proportion and are shown here just for visual clarity and for purposes of explanation. It is also to be understood that the specific embodiments of the present invention that have been described herein are merely illustrative of certain applications of the principles of the present invention. It should further be understood that the geometry, compositions, values, and dimensions of the components described herein can be modified within the scope of the invention and are not generally intended to be exclusive. Numerous other modifications can be made when implementing the invention for a particular environment, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The embodiments described herein are included for the purposes of illustration, and are not intended to be exclusive; rather, they can be modified within the scope of the invention. Other modifications may be made when implementing the invention for a particular application.
While the invention may have been described with reference to certain embodiments, numerous changes, alterations and modifications to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims, and equivalents thereof.
The inventions described herein may be made, used, or licensed by or for the U.S. Government for U.S. Government purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
H000343 | Keown | Oct 1987 | H |
20140020590 | Torsten | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20150316359 | Hales | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20170073281 | Ackerman | Mar 2017 | A1 |