This disclosure relates in general to the field of solar photovoltaics, and more particularly to laser processing techniques for the production of crystalline semiconductor, including crystalline silicon, and other types of photovoltaic solar cells.
Laser processing offers several advantages in terms of efficiency enhancement and manufacturing cost reduction for high-performance, high-efficiency solar cell processing. Firstly, advanced crystalline silicon solar cells may benefit from having the dimensions of the critical features such as electrical contacts be much smaller than the current industrial practice. For front contacted solar cells the contact area of the front metallization to the emitter as well as the contact area of the back metal to the base needs to be low (or the contact area ratios should be fairly small, preferably much below 10%). For an all back-contact, back-junction solar cell, where the emitter and base regions forming the p/n junction and the metallization are on the same side (the cell backside opposite the sunny side), the dimensions of the various features are typically small for high efficiency. In these cells where typically the emitter and base regions form alternate stripes, the width of these regions (in particular the width of the base contact) tends to be small. Also, the dimensions of the metal contacts to these regions tend to be proportionally small. The metallization connecting to the emitter and base regions then needs to be patterned to a correspondingly finer scale. Generally, lithography and laser processing are the technologies that have the relatively fine resolution capability to provide the small dimensions and the control required. Of these techniques, only laser processing offers the low cost advantage required in solar cell making. While lithography requires consumables such as photoresist and subsequent resist developer and stripper (which add to the process cost and complexity), laser processing is a non-contact, dry, direct write method and does not require any material consumables, making it a simpler and lower cost process for solar cell fabrication. Moreover, laser processing is an excellent choice for environmentally benign manufacturing since it is an all-dry process which does not use any consumables such as chemicals.
Further, to reduce the cost of solar cells there is a push to reduce the thickness of the crystalline silicon used and also at the same time increase the cell area for more power per cell and lower manufacturing cost per watt. Laser processing is suitable for these thin wafers and thin-film cell substrates as it is a completely non-contact, dry process and can be easily scaled to larger cell sizes.
Laser processing is also attractive as it is generally a “green” and environmentally benign process, not requiring or using poisonous chemicals or gases. With suitable selection of the laser and the processing system, laser processing presents the possibility of very high productivity with a very low cost of ownership.
Despite these advantages, the use of laser processing in crystalline silicon solar cell making has been limited because laser processes that provide high performance cells have not been developed. Disclosed here are laser processes using schemes that are tailored for each key application to produce solar cells with high efficiency. Specific embodiments are also disclosed for applications of laser processing in manufacturing thin-film crystalline silicon solar cells, such as those manufactured using sub-50-micron silicon substrates formed by epitaxial silicon growth.
Laser processing schemes are disclosed that meet the requirements of base to emitter isolation (including but not limited to shallow trench isolation) for all back-contact homo-junction emitter solar cells (such as high-efficiency back-contact crystalline silicon solar cells), opening for base doping, and base and emitter contact opening (with controlled small contact area ratios, for instance substantially below 10% contact area ratio, for reduced contact recombination losses and increased cell efficiency), selective doping (such as for base and/or emitter contact doping), and metal ablation (formation of patterned metallization layers such as creating the patterned metallization seed layer on a thin-film monocrystalline silicon solar cell prior to subsequent attachment of a backplane to the cell and its release from a reusable host template) for both front-contact and all back-contact/back-junction homo-junction emitter solar cells. Also, laser processing schemes are disclosed that are suitable for selective amorphous silicon ablation and oxide (such as a transparent conductive oxide) ablation, and metal ablation for metal patterning for hetero-junction solar cells (such as back-contact solar cells comprising hetero-junction amorphous silicon emitter on monocrystalline silicon base). These laser processing techniques may be applied to semiconductor substrates, including crystalline silicon substrates, and further including crystalline silicon substrates which are manufactured either through wire saw wafering methods or using epitaxial deposition processes, that are either planar or textured/three-dimensional, where the three-dimensional substrates may be obtained using epitaxial silicon lift-off techniques using porous silicon seed/release layers or other types of sacrificial release layers. These techniques are highly suited to thin crystalline semiconductor, including thin crystalline silicon films obtained using epitaxial silicon deposition on a template comprising a porous silicon release layer or other techniques known in the industry and can have any crystalline silicon absorber thickness in the range of from less than one micron to more than 100 microns (with the thin-film monocrystalline silicon solar cells preferably having a silicon thickness of less than 50 microns).
According to one aspect of the disclosed subject matter, a method for making a crystalline silicon solar cell substrate is provided. A doped dielectric layer is deposited over the backside surface of a crystalline silicon substrate, the doped dielectric layer having a polarity opposite the polarity of the crystalline silicon substrate. Portions of the backside surface of the crystalline substrate are exposed through the doped dielectric layer. An overlayer is deposited over the doped dielectric layer and the exposed portions of the backside surface of the crystalline silicon substrate. Pulsed laser ablation of the overlayer is performed with a flat top laser beam on the silicon substrate to form continuous base openings nested within the exposed portions of the backside surface of the crystalline silicon substrate, the flat top laser beam having a beam intensity profile flatter as compared to a Gaussian beam intensity profile and having a rectangular beam cross section. Doped base regions are formed in the crystalline silicon substrate through the continuous base openings.
The features, nature, and advantages of the disclosed subject matter will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings, in which like reference numerals indicate like features and wherein:
Although the present disclosure is described with reference to specific embodiments, one skilled in the art could apply the principles discussed herein to other areas and/or embodiments without undue experimentation.
We present here laser processing, more specifically pulsed laser processing, schemes that have been developed to address the varying requirements of different processes.
The disclosed methods may be useful in the area of semiconductor device ablation, particularly crystalline silicon ablation. Typically removal of silicon with a laser involves silicon melting and evaporation that leaves undesirable residual damage in the silicon substrate. This damage causes minority carrier lifetime degradation and increased surface recombination velocity (SRV) that reduces the solar cell efficiency. Hence, wet cleaning of the silicon substrate is typically used to remove this damage layer. We present a scheme to reduce this damage to a level acceptable for high efficiency solar cell manufacturing that does not require post-laser-processing wet cleaning, hence simplifying the process flow and reducing the manufacturing cost.
The damage remaining in the silicon substrate upon ablating a certain thickness of it using a laser is related to the amount of laser energy absorbed in the substrate that is not used by the ablated material. If it can be managed that most of the laser energy is used in removing the material then the fraction of the incident energy that seeps into the silicon substrate is minimized, thus minimizing the laser-induced substrate damage and SRV degradation. The penetration of laser energy into silicon depends on the laser pulse length (also called pulse width) and wavelength. The infrared (IR) laser beam, wavelength 1.06 microns, has a long penetration depth in silicon, up to about 1000 microns, while green laser beam, with a wavelength of 532 nm, penetrates only to a depth of approximately 3 to 4 microns. The penetration of UV laser beam, with a wavelength of 355 nm, is even shorter, only about 10 nm. It is clear that using ultra-short pulses of UV or EUV wavelength limits the penetration of the laser energy into silicon. Additionally, shorter laser pulse length results in shorter diffusion of heat into silicon. While a nanoseconds pulse can lead to heat diffusion in silicon to approximately 3 to 4 microns range, the picoseconds pulse reduces it to about 80 to 100 nm, while a femtoseconds pulse is so short that typically there is no heat diffusion into silicon during the laser ablation process. Hence going to shorter pulses with a shorter wavelength lead to diminishing damage to the laser-ablated substrate. For higher production throughput, green or IR wavelengths can be used depending on the extent of laser damage acceptable. Since even under ideal conditions a certain fraction of the energy would still seep into the substrate, this absorption and its undesirable side effects can be further reduced by reducing the laser power. However, this results in a smaller thickness of silicon being ablated (or a lower silicon ablation rate or lower throughput). It has been found that reducing the pulse energy but causing the silicon removal by increasing the overlap of the laser pulses makes the silicon shallow isolation trench smoother. This is an indication of low silicon surface damage. At very low pulse energies the thickness of silicon removed may be small. The desired depth may then be obtained by using multiple overlapped scans of the pulsed laser beam.
A pulsed laser beam with pulse length in the picoseconds range and a wavelength of approximately 355 nm or below is suitable for silicon ablation with low damage enabling low surface recombination velocity (SRV) for passivated ablated surfaces.
The embodiments of this disclosure are also applicable to the ablation of amorphous silicon. A similar scheme may be used to ablate a desired thickness of amorphous silicon using a pulsed laser beam with femtoseconds pulse length and in some embodiments a UV or green wavelength. Since ablation of amorphous silicon requires much lower energy than crystalline silicon, such a scheme may effectively be used to selectively ablate amorphous silicon films from the crystalline silicon surface for application to hetero-junction solar cells.
This disclosure is also applicable to oxide ablation selective to the underlying substrate, crystalline or amorphous silicon. The oxide film is transparent to laser beams of wavelength down to UV. If a nanoseconds pulse length laser is used to remove the overlying oxide, the removal of oxide takes place by heating and melting of silicon underneath. Because of the pressure from the ablated silicon underneath, the overlying oxide is cracked and removed. This however, creates heavy damage in the silicon substrate so that a wet cleaning treatment is typically used to remove this damaged layer for use in high efficiency cells.
We present here a scheme where the oxide layer is selectively removed from the silicon surface without any appreciable damage to the silicon surface. During the laser ablation, besides heating the material to melt or evaporate it, other effects such as plasma formation take place. Sometimes complex processes can take place at an interface. Using a laser with picoseconds pulse length, the oxide to silicon interface is affected. Using a picoseconds laser with a UV wavelength, the interface effects are enhanced so that separation and delamination of the oxide film takes place from the silicon surface. The silicon surface left behind is virtually free of damage. Picoseconds laser radiation with green or infra-red (IR) wavelength can also be used depending on how much penetration damage of silicon substrate is acceptable. This disclosure will outline the procedure to obtain reduced damage selective ablation of oxide from the silicon surface.
The selective ablation of oxide from a silicon surface as disclosed here can be used in solar cell making in several ways. In one application, when using in-situ emitter for back-contact cells, this process is used to open tracks in an oxide film to expose the underlying emitter. The emitter so exposed may be removed using wet etching. This region is then used for base to emitter isolation and with base formed inside it.
In another application, this process is used to open regions that are then used for making metal contacts. For front contacted cells, the oxide passivation can be used on the backside of the cells. The scheme described here is then used to open contacts for the metal that is subsequently deposited on these contacts. In this manner, the metal has localized contact that is conducive to high cell efficiency. For back contacted cells, contacts for both base and emitter may be opened using this scheme.
In a solar cell process flow, a doped oxide may need to be removed without causing any doping of the silicon underneath (i.e., without any appreciable heating of the doped oxide and silicon structure). Since, as described above, the oxide is removed by separation at the oxide/silicon substrate interface when using a picoseconds laser beam, the removal of oxide happens with limited pickup of the dopant from the oxide film being ablated.
The selective ablation of silicon nitride (SiNx) is used for front contacted solar cells. Using laser ablation, the contact area to the emitter surface can be reduced thereby minimizing the area where the SiN passivation is removed. This leads to higher VOC. Picosecond lasers with either UV or green wavelength are suitable for this application, although nanoseconds UV lasers can also be used.
Selective metal ablation from the oxide surface has historically been difficult using lasers. This is because at the high pulse energies needed to ablate metal, the energy is high enough to damage the oxide underneath and cause penetration of metal into oxide. In fact, this is the basis for the process of “laser fired contacts” (LFC) proposed for use in the solar cells.
We disclose three schemes for selectively removing metal from the oxide (or another dielectric) surface with no metal penetration of oxide (or other dielectrics such as silicon nitride) and breaking or cracking of oxide. In all these schemes, aluminum is the first metal in contact with base and emitter (aluminum being used as the contact and light trapping rear mirror layer). A laser with picoseconds pulse length is suitable for this application. For high metal removal rate the IR wavelength is quite suitable. According to the first scheme, metal is ablated at a pulse energy that is lower than the threshold for oxide ablation. If the thickness of metal removed in one scan is lower than the desired thickness, multiple overlapping scans are used to remove the full thickness of metal. Since the pulse energy is below the oxide ablation threshold, a clean removal of metal from the oxide surface is obtained. However, the exact recipe used highly depends on the type of metal in the stack, their thickness and surface roughness, etc.
According to the second, high-throughput scheme higher pulse energies are used, since a substantial part of the incident energy is absorbed as it is being ablated thereby reducing damage to the oxide. This approach makes the laser ablation of metal a very high throughput process. Using this scheme we have ablated 1250 A Al/100-250 A of NiV, with or without a tin (Sn) overlayer up to a thickness of 2500 A successfully using a two step process. In the first step the softer metal is removed using 15 microjoule pulses, followed by 30 microjoule pulses both overlapped fifteen times. For thicker aluminum such as 2000 A the second step can be carried out at 50 microjoules with the same number of overlapping of pulses.
The third scheme of metal ablation is applicable to highly reflective films, for example Al/Ag stack (with Al in contact with the cell and Ag on top of Al), such that most of the incident energy of the picoseconds laser is reflected and ablation is drastically reduced. In that case the surface of the reflective metal (Ag) is first dented using a long pulse length nanoseconds laser, pulse length from 10 to 800 nanoseconds, followed by picoseconds cleanup of the aluminum underneath.
This disclosure is also applicable to the selective doping of a substrate. For successful doping of silicon using an overlying layer of the dopant-containing material, the pulse energy should be high enough to melt the silicon but not high enough to ablate it or the dopant layer above it. As the silicon melts, the dopant is dissolved into it. Upon recrystallization of this silicon layer, a doped layer is obtained. For this application a nanoseconds pulse length laser with green wavelength is quite suitable because of its limited penetration into silicon.
The laser processing techniques described above are applicable to planar and 3-D thin-film crystalline silicon substrates. The laser processes described here are suitable for any thickness of the silicon substrate. These include the current standard wafer thickness of ≧150 microns used for crystalline silicon solar cells. However, they become even more advantageous for thin, fragile wafers or substrates as the process in carried out without any contact with the substrate. These include the wafers thinner than 150 micron obtained from monocrystalline CZ ingots or multi-crystalline bricks using advanced wire sawing techniques or by other techniques such as hydrogen implantation followed by annealing to separate the desired thickness of wafer, or thin-film monocrystalline substrates (such as in the thickness range of from a few microns up to 80 microns) obtained using epitaxial deposition of silicon on a sacrificial separation/release layer such as porous silicon and its subsequent lift off.
The laser processing is uniquely suited to three dimensional substrates obtained using pre-structuring of reusable templates and silicon micromachining techniques. One such method is described in the '713 application.
Although the laser processes and the process flows described here are applicable to any thickness of the silicon substrate (from less than one micron to over 100 microns), we disclose here their application to solar cells made using thin silicon substrates in the thickness range of from less than 1 micron to about 80 microns, including but not limited to those that are obtained using epitaxial silicon on porous silicon surface of a reusable template as described in the '713 application. To facilitate the understanding of our application, the process flow for obtaining a desired thickness (e.g. from about less than 10 microns up to about 120 microns) of planar monocrystalline TFSSs according to that publication is shown in
The thin planar substrate obtained using the process flow of
The processes described here are further uniquely suited to simplifying the all back-contact cell process flow.
For applications in hetero-junction solar cells, a hetero-junction emitter may be formed by a doped amorphous silicon layer in contact with an oppositely doped crystalline silicon base. For interdigitated back contact solar cells we pattern the amorphous silicon layer and the transparent conducting oxide (TCO) using laser ablation that is selective to the crystalline layer. Femtoseconds pulsewidth lasers with either UV or green wavelength are suitable for this application. A process flow is described in
Various embodiments and methods of this disclosure include at least the following aspects: the process to obtain ablation of crystalline and amorphous silicon with reduced damage; the process to obtain oxide ablation for both doped and undoped oxides with reduced damage to silicon; the process to obtain fully isolated metal patterns on a dielectric surface for solar cell metallization; the process to selectively dope the emitter and base contact regions; the use of pulsed laser processing on very thin wafers, including planar and 3-D silicon substrate; the use of pulsed laser processing on substrates obtained using epitaxial deposition on a reusable template made using template pre-structuring techniques; the use of various pulsed laser processes in making front contacted homo-junction solar cells; the use of various pulsed laser processes in making all-back contacted homo-junction solar cells; and the use of various pulsed laser processes in making hetero-junction solar cells.
Although the front contact solar cells are described with p-type base and back-contact back-junction solar cells are described with n-type base, the laser processes described here are equally suited to the substrate with opposite doping, i.e., n-type for front contact solar cell with P+ emitter, and p-type base for back-contact back-junction solar cells with p-type base and n+ emitter.
The following description, tables, and figures disclose the application of flat top laser beams to laser processing methods for interdigitated back-contact cells (IBC).
As disclosed herein, high-efficiency back-contacted, back-junction cells with interdigitated back contact (IBC) metallization benefits from the use of at least one or several steps of pulsed laser processing. Laser processing may be utilized in several processing steps throughout the formation of the back contact cell, including: delineating/defining emitter and base regions (or base-to-emitter isolation region), defining back-surface field (BSF) or base regions, doping to form back surface fields (by laser irradiation), selective doping of contacts, opening contacts in the dielectric to base and emitter, and metal patterning. Some of these steps require laser processing of wide areas that are typically produced by overlapping Gaussian beam laser spots. Overlapping severely reduces cell processing speed and may cause silicon damage, resulting in degradation of cell performance and yield. By using flat top beam methods disclosed herein, the overlapping of spots is dramatically reduced so that the semiconductor (e.g., crystalline silicon) substrate damage is significantly reduced and throughput is increased. Also, smaller diameter Gaussian spots may be replaced with a relatively wide flat top laser beam which may further substantially increase the throughput.
After the emitter to BSF isolation region is defined in the BSG Open step, a USG layer is deposited on the wafer followed by laser ablation of this layer in patterns that are inlaid to the BSG Open region, as shown in
Next, a PSG layer is deposited on the wafer and the silicon exposed to PSG in the BSF opening is doped using selective laser scans of this area. The doped BSF regions (base regions) are outlined in
Next, the contacts to base and emitter are made using laser ablation as shown in
As disclosed previously, a picoseconds pulse length laser may be used for oxide ablation processes of BSG open, BSF opening, and contact opening, although a nanoseconds pulse length laser may also be used. Further, although IR wavelength may be used, green or UV or smaller wavelengths are more suitable because of their reduced penetration into silicon.
For BSF doping particularly, a nanoseconds pulse length laser may be more suitable because of its penetration into silicon. And although IR wavelength may be used, green wavelength, because of its reduced penetration compared to IR, may be more suitable for the depth of doping typically desired.
The disclosed flat top laser beam processing steps that may be utilized to make this structure possible include, but are not limited to: delineation of emitter and base regions (BSF and emitter to BSF isolation) by laser ablation of an emitter or deposited boron doping dielectric (such as boro-silicate glass BSG deposited by APCVD); delineation of the BSF region by opening the dielectric covering the opening made in the BSG; N+ doping of the base (e.g., with phosphorus); opening of metallization contacts to base and emitter regions; and metal patterning using metal laser ablation to isolate base and emitter contacts.
A second example method for creating a flat top beam, as shown
A third beam shaping system for creating a flat top beam, as shown
A flat top beam, whether having a square or rectangular cross section, offers throughput advantages particularly as compared to a Gaussian beam.
However, the ablation region edges created using a flat top beam are straight allowing the alignment margin to stay at M. For the back contact back junction solar cells described herein, BSF openings are formed inside the BSG Open regions, and contact openings are formed inside the BSF region. Hence, a larger alignment margin is important as it allows for smaller BGS Open, BSF, and contact regions. Thus reducing the electrical shading and improving solar cell performance.
Since the overlap of square or rectangular flat top beam can be reduced in both x and y direction while making a large area ablation or doping, the throughput is significantly enhanced. Also, since the size of the square or rectangular flat top can be increased without causing excessive zigzagging of the perimeter, throughput is further increased. Table 1 shows the reduction in the number of scans needed to open a 150 μm wide line, such as used for delineating the base area by ablating the BSG film.
Table 1 below shows the throughput of Gaussian vs. Flat Top laser beams for creating a 90 μm wide base opening. The results of Table 1 are shown graphically in
Also, because overlap is significantly reduced in both x and y directions when using a flat top beam, the laser induced damage of silicon is greatly reduced as compared to the Gaussian beam.
Similar throughput advantages may also result when utilizing a flat top beam for opening the oxide region for BSF, doping the BSF region using the overlying PSG, forming base and metal contact openings if they are line contacts, and the metal ablation isolation lines—all with the concurrent advantage of reduced silicon damage. Additionally, utilizing a flat top beam provides the advantage of increased alignment window for BSF opening inside the BSG opening and contact opening inside the BSF. Flat top laser processing methods may also increase throughput for forming a back surface field. For example, the back surface field may be formed by doping the base region, opened as described, with an n-type dopant such as phosphorous. For this process the base is covered with a phosphorus-doped silicon oxide (PSG) layer and the doping may be performed by irradiating this region with a laser beam. While uniformly doping this region using Gaussian laser beams requires overlapping, overlapping is minimized or may be completely reduced using a flat top beam. And as with the base and emitter region delineation and back surface field delineation described herein, utilizing a flat top laser beam provides a substantial throughput and reduced damage advantage as required overlapping is decreased. It should be noted that for forming a back surface field, the beam need to be flat top beam only in one direction—normal to the scan, whereas it may be Gaussian in the direction of the scan. This type of beam is called a hybrid flat top beam.
Importantly, for forming isolated base or emitter contacts, although overlap is not an issue, the silicon damage is still reduced using a flat top beam because of the absence, unlike Gaussian, of a high intensity peak in the center of the beam (as shown in
Those with ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the disclosed embodiments have relevance to a wide variety of areas in addition to those specific examples described above.
The foregoing description of the exemplary embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the claimed subject matter. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without the use of the innovative faculty. Thus, the claimed subject matter is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features, and advantages that are included within this description be within the scope of the claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/391,863 filed Oct. 11, 2010 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/118,295 filed May 27, 2011, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/868,488 filed Oct. 6, 2007, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/868,492 filed Oct. 6, 2007, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/774,713 filed May 5, 2010, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/057,104 filed Feb. 1, 2011, which are also hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4043894 | Gibbs | Aug 1977 | A |
4070206 | Kressel et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4082570 | House et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4165252 | Gibbs | Aug 1979 | A |
4249959 | Jebens | Feb 1981 | A |
4251679 | Zwan | Feb 1981 | A |
4348254 | Lindmayer | Sep 1982 | A |
4361950 | Amick | Dec 1982 | A |
4409423 | Holt | Oct 1983 | A |
4427839 | Hall | Jan 1984 | A |
4430519 | Young | Feb 1984 | A |
4461922 | Gay et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4479847 | McCaldin et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4626613 | Wenham et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4672023 | Leung | Jun 1987 | A |
4800179 | Mukai | Jan 1989 | A |
4922277 | Carlson | May 1990 | A |
5011565 | Dube et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5024953 | Uematsu et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5073230 | Maracas et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5112453 | Behr et al. | May 1992 | A |
5208068 | Davis | May 1993 | A |
5248621 | Sano | Sep 1993 | A |
5316593 | Olson et al. | May 1994 | A |
5348589 | Arai et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5348618 | Canham et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5397400 | Matsuno et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5458755 | Fujiyama et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459099 | Hsu | Oct 1995 | A |
5494832 | Lehmann et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5538564 | Kaschmitter | Jul 1996 | A |
5616185 | Kukulka | Apr 1997 | A |
5641362 | Meier | Jun 1997 | A |
5645684 | Keller | Jul 1997 | A |
5660680 | Keller | Aug 1997 | A |
5681392 | Swain | Oct 1997 | A |
5704992 | Willeke et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5882988 | Haberern et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899360 | Mack et al. | May 1999 | A |
5928438 | Salami et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5989977 | Wu et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994640 | Bansemir et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6058945 | Fujiyama et al. | May 2000 | A |
6091021 | Ruby | Jul 2000 | A |
6096229 | Shahid | Aug 2000 | A |
6114046 | Hanoka | Sep 2000 | A |
6127623 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143629 | Sato | Nov 2000 | A |
6204443 | Kiso et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6225193 | Simpson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6294725 | Hirschberg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6331208 | Nishida et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6399143 | Sun | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416647 | Dordi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428620 | Yamagata et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6429037 | Wenham et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441297 | Keller et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448155 | Iwasaki et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461932 | Wang | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6524880 | Moon et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6534336 | Iwane et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551908 | Ukiyo et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6555443 | Artmann et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6566235 | Nishida et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6602760 | Poortmans et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6602767 | Nishida et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613148 | Rasmussen | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624009 | Green et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645833 | Brendel | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6649485 | Solanki et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653722 | Blalock | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6664169 | Iwasaki et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6756289 | Nakagawa et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6818104 | Iwasaki et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6881644 | Malik et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6887804 | Sun | May 2005 | B2 |
6946052 | Yanagita et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6964732 | Solanki | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6982218 | Preu et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7014748 | Matsumura et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022585 | Solanki | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7026237 | Lamb | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7057256 | Carey et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7309658 | Lazovsky et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7368756 | Bruhns et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7402523 | Nishimura | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7517709 | Borden | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7857907 | Cho et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8399331 | Moslehi et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8409976 | Hieslmair | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8637340 | Moslehi et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
9214585 | Rana | Dec 2015 | B2 |
20020079290 | Holdermann | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020153039 | Moon et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168592 | Vezenov | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020179140 | Toyomura | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030017712 | Brendel | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030039843 | Johnson | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030124761 | Baert | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040028875 | Van Rijn | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040042080 | Caudle et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040173790 | Yeo | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040175893 | Vatus et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192044 | Degertekin et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040200520 | Mulligan et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040235406 | Duescher | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040259335 | Narayanan | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261834 | Basore et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265587 | Koyanagi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050160970 | Niira | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172996 | Hacke et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050172998 | Gee et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050176164 | Gee et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177343 | Nagae | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050199279 | Yoshimine et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050274410 | Yuuki et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281982 | Li | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009008 | Kaneuchi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060021565 | Zahler et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060043495 | Uno | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060054212 | Fraas et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060238 | Hacke et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070884 | Momoi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060088984 | Li et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105492 | Veres et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060130891 | Carlson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060177988 | Shea et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060196536 | Fujioka | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060228897 | Timans | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060231031 | Dings et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060266916 | Miller et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060283495 | Gibson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286775 | Singh et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070077770 | Wang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082499 | Jung et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070137692 | Carlson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070151598 | De Ceuster et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070157965 | Park et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070256728 | Cousins | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080047601 | Nag et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080128641 | Henley et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080132054 | Ribeyron et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080157283 | Moslehi | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080202576 | Hieslmair | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080202577 | Hieslmair | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080210294 | Moslehi | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080264477 | Moslehi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080289684 | Moslehi | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295887 | Moslehi | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090042320 | Wang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090107545 | Moslehi | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090301549 | Moslehi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090301557 | Agostinelli et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100022074 | Wang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100051085 | Weidman et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100055822 | Weidman et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100059109 | Nakayashiki et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100108130 | Ravi | May 2010 | A1 |
20100116316 | Moslehi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100144079 | Mayer et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100144080 | Ong | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100148318 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100148319 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100154998 | Ong | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100175752 | Wang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100203711 | Wang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100224229 | Pralle et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100240172 | Rana et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100243040 | Kim | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100267186 | Wang et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100267245 | Kamian et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100279494 | Wang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100294333 | Wang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100294356 | Parikh et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100300518 | Moslehi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100304521 | Seutter et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100304522 | Rana et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319763 | Park et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110014742 | Parikh et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110030610 | Kamian et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110265864 | Kim et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110300665 | Harley et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110315186 | Gee | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120028399 | Moslehi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120055541 | Granek et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120178203 | Moslehi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120225515 | Moslehi et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120227810 | Hieslmair | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120291859 | Vineis et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130130430 | Moslehi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130164883 | Moslehi et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130217172 | Rana et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140017846 | Moslehi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140158193 | Desphande et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140370650 | Moslehi et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150054903 | Liu | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150090328 | Smith | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150140721 | Moslehi et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150162487 | Deshazer | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150171230 | Kapur | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150171240 | Kapur | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150311378 | Kapur | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160093763 | Rana | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10 2009 018112 | Dec 2010 | DE |
06-260670 | Sep 1994 | JP |
2002-299661 | Oct 2002 | JP |
10-2009-0025998 | Mar 2009 | KR |
10-2010-0085736 | Jul 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0096819 | Sep 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0102255 | Sep 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0107258 | Oct 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0128132 | Dec 2010 | KR |
10-1023144 | Mar 2011 | KR |
10-2011-0122214 | Nov 2011 | KR |
10-2011-0129084 | Dec 2011 | KR |
PCTEP1999008573 | May 2000 | WO |
WO2008156631 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO2010057060 | May 2010 | WO |
WO2010091466 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO2010135153 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO2011072153 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO2011150397 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO2012092537 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO2012162276 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alvin D. Compaan, Photovoltaics: Clean Power for the 21st Century, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 2170-2180, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
C.Berge, 150-mm Layer Transfer for Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Cells, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 3102-3107, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
C.Oules et al, Silicon on Insulator Structures Obtained by Epitaxial Growth of Silicon over Porous Silicon, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Inc., 1992, p. 3595, vol. 139, No. 12, Meylan Cedex, France. |
C.S.Solanki, et al, Porous Silicon Layer Transfer Processes for Solar Cells, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2004, pp. 101-113, vol. 83, Elsevier B.V., Leuven, Belgium. |
C.S.Solanki, et al, Self-Standing Porous Silicon Films by One-Step Anodizing, Journal of Electrochemical Society, 2004, pp. C307-C314, vol. 151, The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Leuven, Belgium. |
F.Duerinckx, et al, Reorganized Porous Silicon Bragg Reflectors for Thin-Film Silicon Solar Cells, IEEE Electron Device Letters, Oct. 2006, vol. 27, No. 10. |
Francois J. Henley, Layer-Transfer Quality Cleave Principles, SiGen, 2005, Jul. 8, pp. 1-6, The Silicon Genesis Corporation, San Jose, California. |
H.J.Kim, et al, Large-Area Thin-Film Free-Standing Monocrystalline Si Solar cells by Layer Transfer, Leuven, Belgium, IEEE. |
J.H.Werner et al, From Polycrystalline to Single Crystalline Silicon on Glass, Thin Solid Films, 2001, pp. 95-100, vol. 383, Issue 1-2, Elsevier Science B.V., Germany. |
J.J. Schermer et al., Epitaxial Lift-Off for large area thin film III/V devices, phys. Stat. sol. (a) 202, No. 4, 501-508 (2005). |
Jianhua Zhao, et al, A 19.8% Efficient Honeycomb Multicrystalline Silicon Solar Cell with Improved Light Trapping, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1999, vol. 46, No. 10. |
K. Van Nieuwenhuysen et al., Progress in epitaxial deposition on low-cost substrates for thin-film crystalline silicon solar cells at IMEC, Journal of Crystal Growth, 2006, pp. 438-441, vol. 287, Elsevier B.V., Leuven, Belgium. |
K.L. Chopra et al., Thin-Film Solar Cells: An Overview, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2004, pp. 69-92, vol. 12, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Lammert et al., The Interdigitated Back Contact Solar Cell: A Silicon Solar Cell for Use in Concentrated Sunlight, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, pp. 337-342. |
MacDonald et al., “Design and Fabrication of Highly Topographic Nano-imprint Template for Dual Damascene Full 3-D Imprinting,” Dept. of Chemical Eng., University of Texas at Austin, Oct. 24, 2005. |
Martin A. Green, Consolidation of Thin-Film Photovoltaic. |
Technology: The Coming Decade of Opportunity, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2006, pp. 383-392, vol. 14, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Martin A. Green, Silicon Photovoltaic Modules: A Brief History of the First 50 Years, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2005, pp. 447-455, vol. 13, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Nobuhiko Sato et al, Epitaxial Growth on Porous Si for a New Bond and Etchback Silicon-on-Insulator, Journal of Electrochemical Society, Sep. 1995, vol. 142, No. 9, The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Hiratsuka, Japan. |
P.J.Verlinden, et al, Sliver® Solar Cells: A New Thin-Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Technology, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 3422-3430, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
P.R. Hageman et al., Large Area, Thin Film Epitaxial Lift Off III/V Solar Cells, 25th PVSC, 1996, May 13-17, Washington D.C., IEEE. |
Photovoltaic Technology Research Advisory Council, A Vision for Photovoltaic Technology, 2005, pp. 1-41, European Commision Publications Office. |
Prometheus Institute, U.S. Solar Industry Year in Review: U.S. Solar Energy Industry Charging Ahead, (SEIA) The Solar Energy Industry Association. |
R.Brendel, et al, Sol-Gel Coatings for Light Trapping in Crystalline Thin Film Silicon Solar Cells, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1997, pp. 391-394, vol. 218, Elsevier Science B.V., Germany. |
Richard Auer et al, Simplified Transfer Process for High-Current Thin-Film Crystalline Si Solar Modules, 3rd World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, May 11-18, 2003, Osaka, Japan. |
Richard M. Swanson, A Vision for Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2006, pp. 443-453, vol. 14, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Rolf Brendel, A Novel Process for Ultrathin Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Cells on Glass, 14th European Photovolaic Solar Energy Conference, Jun. 30-Jul. 4, 1997, Barcelona, Spain. |
Rolf Brendel, Review of Layer Transfer Processes for Cystalline Thin-Film Silicon Solar Cells, the Japan Journal of Applied Physics, 2001, pp. 4431-4439, vol. 40, Part 1, No. 7, The Japan Society of Applied Physics, Japan. |
Rolf Brendel, Thin-Film Crystalline Silicone Mini-Modules Using Porous Si for Layer Transfer, Solar Energy, 2004, pp. 969-982, vol. 77, Elsevier Ltd., Germany. |
S. Hegedus, Thin Film Solar Modules: The Low Cost, High Throughput and Versatile Alternative to Si Wafers, Progress in Photvoltaics: Research and Applications, 2006, pp. 393-411, vol. 14, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Takao Yonehara, et al, Epitaxial Layer Transfer by Bond and Etch Back of Porous Si, Applied Physics Letter 64, Apr. 18, 1994, vol. 16, American Institute of Physics. |
Toshiki Yagi, et al, Ray-Trace Simulation of Light Trapping in Silicon Solar Cell with Texture Structures, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 2647-2656, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
Grohe et al. (2009) “Novel laser technologies for crystalline silicon solar cell production” Proceedings of SPIE, 7202: 72020P (1-12) DOI: 10.1117/12.810128. |
Hermann et al. (Nov. 7, 2009) “Picosecond laser ablation of Si02 layers on silicon substrates” Applied Physics A; Materials Science & Processing, 99(1): 151-158. |
Mangersnes et al. (Feb. 23, 2010) “Damage free laser ablation of Si02 for local contact opening on silicon solar cells using an a-Si: H buffer layer” Journal of Applied Physics, 107(4): 43518 (1-6). |
Palani et al. (2010) “Investigation on Laser-annealing and Subsequent Laser-nanotexturing of Amorphous Silicon (a-Si) Films for Photovoltaic Application” JLMN-Journal of Laser Micro/Nanoengineering, 5(2): 150-155. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120122272 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61391863 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11868488 | Oct 2007 | US |
Child | 13271212 | US | |
Parent | 11868492 | Oct 2007 | US |
Child | 11868488 | US | |
Parent | 12774713 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 11868492 | US | |
Parent | 13057104 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 12774713 | US | |
Parent | 13118295 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 13057104 | US |