Patent Grant
7357078
1. Field of the Invention
The invention concerns a method of making a multilayer printing blanket at least an outer layer of which is provided with embedded particles and a resulting blanket.
2. Background of the Invention
Making the surface of the lithographic layer heterogeneous in order to obtain special transfer properties is already known. For example, in the document EP 0 224 365 it is proposed to embed particles in the surface and then to remove these particles by washing in order to create a cavo-relief that is capable of being inked. The document EP 0 511 543 describes a cylinder for a printing machine the outer oleophilic metal surface of which is embedded with a hydrophilic material, ceramic for example. Document FR 2 748 422 shows the possibility of obtaining heterogeneity of the transfer surface by photochemical grafting.
All of these known methods have in common the major disadvantage of requiring complicated implementation and of not being sufficiently effective.
In one aspect, the present invention is directed to a method for forming a multilayer printing blanket in which particles are embedded into a surface of a layer by applying pressure to the particles.
According to one characteristic of the invention, the particles are embedded by calendering.
According to another characteristic of the invention, in order to embed the particles, the polymer layer with the blanket carcass is made to pass between two calender rollers, and the calender roller in contact with the surface in which the embedding is to be done is caused to pass through a receptacle containing the particles to be embedded, making these particles adhere to the surface of the roller.
In another aspect, the present invention is directed to a multilayer printing blanket having at least one outer layer provided with a surface having embedded particles therein, the multilayer printing blanket being formed, at least in part, by applying pressure to particles to embed them into the layer.
The invention will be better understood, and other goals, characteristics, details and advantages thereof will appear more clearly in the explanatory description that will follow, given with reference to the attached schematic diagrams given solely by way of example, illustrating several forms of embodiment of the invention, and in which:
The device for the implementation of the method according to the invention, shown in
The temperature of the dipping cylinder 12, its roughness and the calendering pressure are parameters that control the quantity of particles deposited. The trough 15 can be given a vibration movement in order to ensure a regular deposit on the surface of the cylinder 12.
A scraping device for the dipping cylinder 12 can also be provided to proportion the quantity of particles deposited and embedded in the surface of the blanket.
A polymer layer 8 could be the lithographic layer of the blanket or the layer at the back thereof or one or both lithographic layers of a blanket having a lithographic layer on both outer faces. The layer on the back of the blanket is the layer on the face opposite to the face having the lithographic layer if the blanket has only one.
The particle could be of any appropriate type, enabling the desired transfer properties to be obtained. The particles could be glass microbeads, polymer or ceramic powders or anti-cling powders. Glass microbeads are particularly suitable for obtaining good adhesion of the water or affinity to the moistening water. PTFE particles make it possible to increase the anti-cling of the surface and polyamide particles enable the affinity to greasy inks to be improved.
By embedding glass microbeads, for example, in the polymer layer on the back of the blanket, on the surface, a reduction is obtained of the friction coefficient of the layer in contact with its support. A low friction coefficient facilitates the mounting of the blanket on the cylinder of the printing machine.
The surface embedding of the particles can also be obtained by transfer by an electric field followed by fixing by calendering or similar, with heating. Adhesion of the particles could also be achieved by gluing, followed by calendering.
In a variation of an embodiment, the embedding described here can be done on the surface of a previously extruded polymer film and, when applicable, rectified by simply heating of the surface thereof using known means, such as infrared banks, and passing the blanket with its layer of heated polymer on the surface between the rolls of the calender of
As a variation, a film could also be deposited of liquid or pasty or doughy product containing particles which, driven by the dipping cylinder, are immobilized in contact with the hot polymer film on the surface of the blanket when it passes through the contact zone between the two rollers of the calender.
The diameter of the particles is preferably between 1 and 50μ. Indeed, if the diameter is too large, the quality of printing deteriorates. If the diameter is too small, the implementation of the embedding becomes difficult.
The invention makes it possible to produce a blanket that can have advantageous features in addition to those mentioned above.
According to the invention, a blanket having on the back a layer of polymer material can be precision ground to make the blanket thickness more uniform, while preserving or improving the printing properties and qualities.
In particular, the rectification of the polymer layer on the back makes it possible to regulate the thickness of blankets with precision ground and buffed lithographic layer and blankets with smoother surface obtained by molding, and because of this, having excellent printing quality.
However, in general, the rectification is applicable to all blankets the thickness of which should be made uniform, regardless of the means used to produce a lithographic surface that ensures good printing quality.
Compared to a blanket without rectification, the invention therefore makes it possible to obtain a gain in precision by a factor of 2, that is, an overall thickness tolerance of ±0.01 mm compared to about ±0.02 mm according to the current status of the technology.
In addition to the uniformity of thickness of the blanket, the invention also makes it possible to obtain a reduction in the total thickness of the blanket. In fact, by separating the different functions to be accomplished by the blanket, and by allocating these functions to specific layers, an optimal structure of the blanket can be established by assembling layers of fabric, compressible layers and the lithographic layer. It has been established that the use of a beam or a thread or a woven grid makes it possible to replace several fabrics and thus to obtain a reduction in thickness. The use of a beam of Aramid type fibers, for example, makes it possible to economize on the relative thickness by at least one fold of fabric. The gain is at least 0.5 mm.
Because the beam replaces reinforcement fabrics that contribute to the compressibility of the blanket, this compressibility is maintained in spite of the fact that fabric was removed, by making the polymer layer on the back compressible as a result.
Thus the invention allows a blanket to be made with a practically uniform thickness of 1.00 to 1.30 mm while preserving the breaking strength of known blankets.
The invention enables a blanket to be produced that has, from the interior toward the exterior, the following layers: a layer of slightly compressible polymer, an Aramid or equivalent beam in the warp direction, a main compressible layer, a stabilization fabric with, for example, monofilaments in the weft direction and flexible warp and a lithographic layer.
In a first variation, the stabilization fabric can be replaced by a layer of hard polymer possibly reinforced by fibers, and in a second variation, the compressible layer or layers can be made anisotropic by incorporating fibers oriented in the plane of the blanket. In this case, the stabilization layer can be omitted, with an additional reduction of thickness.
The blanket shown in
In the blanket according to
The blanket in
The blanket shown in
Finally,
According to another feature of the invention, by using for the structure of the different layers materials and means of assembly of the layers that do not involve the use of solvents, blankets can be obtained that do not represent any hazard to man and the environment. The different layers of the blankets can be made to adhere to each other by corona, ionization or flame treatment.
Specifically, the elastomers used within the scope of the invention have the special characteristic that they do not contain thermal cross-linking agents. They are thermoplastic in nature with a suitable rheology, and the different layers may be cross-linked by radiation after assembly of all or part of the blanket.
The materials used have the property of becoming fluid at high temperature, and thus make possible the creation of thin films of good quality, in particular by extrusion.
Examples of elastomers and reinforcements that can be used in blankets according to the invention are formulations of TPU type elastomers in association with other polymers, PP, PAN and PVC based dynamic vulcanization elastomers, elastomers of the styrene family, elastomer formulations of the olefin family, olefin copolymers and functionalized olefins, elastomers of the acrylonitrile family, EPDMs or CSMs, Aramid type fiber or thread reinforcements, polyethylene or polypropylene type fiber or thread reinforcements, polyester type fiber or thread reinforcements or mixtures of such fibers or such threads.
Because of their thermoplastic implementation and therefore their property of fusing simply by heating at high temperature to create perfect joints, materials with no solvents and thus not hazardous to man or the environment used within the scope of the invention, can be used to produce tubular blankets.
Thus, for example, a tubular lithographic layer can be produced from a lithographic layer obtained by extrusion and cut to the appropriate length, and after beveling the ends, by rolling this layer onto a support sleeve, overlapping the beveled ends and heating them. This layer could be cross-linked by radiation, where appropriate, then precision ground and buffed. It could be embedded with particles on the surface. The support sleeve in this case could be the layer of the blanket on which the lithographic layer lies. A compressible layer could be made of a similar material with the additional possibility of ensuring the expansion of this layer during the assembly of the ends as a result of the expandable microbeads previously incorporated in the materials forming the layer. The extruded film intended to become a compressible layer could advantageously include fibers that will be oriented in the plane during extrusion in order to confer anisotropic properties to the layer. An extruded film having oriented fibers can also function as a reinforcing or stabilization or paper flow control layer.
The invention achieves numerous advantages. As a result of the rectification of the polymer layer at the back of the blanket, the thickness of said blanket is more precise and uniform. This has a direct impact on the performance of the blankets. Indeed, a controlled thickness improves the printing quality and the durability of the blankets.
The excellent printing quality obtained by a smooth, and even very smooth, printing surface can be preserved. Such type of smooth surface allows details to be printed accurately and makes it possible to generate so-called “pointue” printing or “high fidelity” printing. It allows the use of a stochastic screen. The smooth surface can be characterized by a very low roughness, with an Ra (average roughness measured by a profilometer) of less than 0.4μ compared to values of 0.8 to 1.5μ for blankets using conventional technology. The deterioration of the regularity of the thickness when a very smooth printing surface is desired, for example by buffing said surface, and the compromise made for known blankets being satisfied with a less heavy-duty buffing and therefore a less smooth surface, can be discontinued thanks to the rectification of the layer at the back, as proposed by the invention.
The reduction of the thickness of the blankets results in a reduction of vibration by allowing cylinders to be designed with narrow gaps for attaching the blanket and thus minimizing bouncing during rolling at high speed. Moreover, the invention ensures a reduction in cost in so far as a thin blanket requires less material to produce, materials being the largest portion of the cost of production.
The invention also makes it possible to reduce the quantity of waste. Indeed, thinner blankets mean a smaller quantity of waste to be eliminated. Finally, by embedding particles in the surface of the lithographic layer, or the layer at the back, it is possible to obtain a desired micro-hetero-roughness of surface and/or reduce the friction of the blanket on the support. A low coefficient of friction is very useful in facilitating the attaching of the blanket on the cylinder of the printing machine. A thin blanket according to the invention also has the following advantages: reduction of paper waste on press; possibility of implementing innovative tensioning systems; increased folding flexibility, facilitating rolling the blanket on at the attachment gap and printing can be done as close as possible to said gap.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00 07065 | May 2000 | FR | national |
This is a Continuation-in-Part of PCT/FR01/01679, filed 30 May 2001, which published in French as WO 01/92027. This application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/304,750, filed on even date herewith, which is a Continuation-in-Part of PCT/PR01/01678 and is entitled “Method of Making a Printing Blanket and Resulting Blanket”. This application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/305,155, filed on even date herewith, which is a Continuation-in-Part of PCT/FR01/01680 and is entitled “Method for Making A Printing Blanket Comprising A Back Layer Made Of A Polymer Material And Resulting Blanket”.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4093764 | Duckett et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4287827 | Warner | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4380196 | Kato et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4401494 | Pernicano et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4491855 | Fujii et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 5213042 | Larios | May 1993 | A |
| 5249525 | Lewis et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5327169 | Thompson | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5553845 | Sawa et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5620775 | LaPerre | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5644985 | Serain et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 6146748 | Risquez | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6165553 | Chen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6536342 | Rodgers | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 42 19 509 | Dec 1993 | DE |
| 0224 365 | Jun 1987 | EP |
| 0 511 543 | Nov 1992 | EP |
| 0 571 909 | Dec 1993 | EP |
| 0 676 301 | Oct 1995 | EP |
| 0 914 966 | May 1999 | EP |
| 2 748 422 | Nov 1997 | FR |
| 2 089 228 | Jun 1982 | GB |
| 2202763 | Oct 1988 | GB |
| 58-167197 | Oct 1983 | JP |
| 10193828 | Jul 1998 | JP |
| 63223156 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 93 09941 | May 1993 | WO |
| 97 00169 | Jan 1997 | WO |
| WO 9700169 | Jan 1997 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030140805 A1 | Jul 2003 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/FR01/01679 | May 2001 | US |
| Child | 10305156 | US |
