Method for Making a Transition between Polymer Grades

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20100016523
  • Publication Number
    20100016523
  • Date Filed
    March 28, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Published
    January 21, 2010
    15 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to a method of transition between polymer grades in a polymerisation process comprising polymerising at least one monomer in at least a first reactor and a second reactor connected to each other in series, wherein the monomer feed in the first reactor is maintained essentially constant during the transition.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method of transition between polymer grades in a polymerisation process comprising polymerising at least one monomer in at least a first reactor and a second reactor connected to each other in series.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A polymer grade is a polymer that falls within a given set of specifications, which define specific properties that the polymer must have, for example for polyethylene a melt flow index and a density falling within given ranges. In polymerisation processes that produce polymers in a continuous process, the change from one grade of polymer to another grade of the same polymer or the change from a homopolymer to a copolymer or vice versa is made by changing the reaction conditions while at the same time producing polymer. This change is called a transition and it is in this description considered to start at a time 0 (t=0), which is when the reaction conditions are first changed with the intention of targeting a second polymer grade. At t=0, the reaction is still producing the first grade of polymer product, that is, the reactor is producing a polymer that is within the specifications set for that first grade. After t=0, the reaction conditions are gradually changed and thus if the second grade is highly different from the first grade, polymer that is off-specification, i.e. not within the specifications of either the first or the second grade, is produced.


The transition is considered finished when the reactor produces the second grade, i.e. a polymer that is within the specifications set for said second grade. During a transition, the parameters that are typically changed, for example in the case of olefin polymerisations, are selected from temperature, feed of monomer, feed of comonomer, feed of hydrogen, feed of cocatalyst or feed of catalyst. By the “feed” of a substance it is meant herein the flow rate of the substance in kg per hour into a reactor.


In a process comprising two or more reactors in series, monomer is firstly polymerised in a first reactor and then passed into a second reactor wherein the polymerisation continues. The transitions in this kind of process are at the moment made by changing the reaction conditions in both reactors at the same time. The changes made in both reactors at the same time however lead to an important degree of fluctuation of the properties of the polymer products, such as fluctuations in the melt index of the polymer, as well as to an important amount of product that is off-specification.


OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to provide a method of making a transition while reducing the time required for it. Another object of the invention is to provide a method for transition wherein the fluctuations in the properties of the polymers formed are minimised. A further object of the present invention is to provide a method for transition that enables a reduction in the amount of polymer that is off-specification.


At least one of the above objects is achieved by the means of the present invention, namely a method of transition between polymer grades in a polymerisation process comprising polymerising at least one monomer in at least a first reactor and a second reactor connected to each other in series, wherein the monomer feed into the first reactor is maintained essentially constant during the transition. The invention is particularly applicable to transitions between polyolefin grades.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an example of the monomer feed in the first reactor according to the prior art. The abscissa represents time in h:min and the ordinate represents the monomer feed in kg/h.



FIG. 2 is an example of the monomer feed in the first reactor according to the invention. The abscissa represents time in h:min and the ordinate represents the monomer feed in kg/h.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a method of transition between polymer grades in a polymerisation process comprising polymerising at least one monomer in at least a first reactor and a second reactor connected to each other in series, wherein the monomer feed into the first reactor is maintained essentially constant during the transition.


The present invention thus provides a method for making a transition in such a manner that the fluctuations in the reactors are minimised, the amount of off-specifications is reduced significantly and the time required for the transition is also reduced.


The number of reactors used in the present invention can be two, three, four, five, six or more. The monomer feed in the first reactor is not changed, whereas the other feeds can be changed. The other feeds are based on, for example in the case of olefin polymerisations, the hexane/monomer ratio or the hydrogen/monomer ratio.


According to the present invention, the monomer feed in the first reactor is kept essentially constant during the transition. By essentially constant it is meant that the monomer feed in the first reactor is changed at most by 5% during the transition. The percentage change is in relation to the average monomer feed during the transition in the first reactor. According to another embodiment, the monomer feed in the first reactor is changed at most by 2% during the transition. According to a preferred embodiment, the monomer feed in the first reactor is changed at most by 1% during the transition.


According to an embodiment, the polymerisation process is an olefin polymerisation process carried out using a metallocene catalyst, a chromium-type catalyst and/or a Ziegler-Natta catalyst. Ziegler-Natta catalysts are preferred.


The invention can be used in the polymerisation of any desired monomer. However, according to an embodiment of the invention, the polymer grades are polyolefin grades. In this case, the monomers are olefins, such as ethylene, propylene, 1-butene, 1-hexene, 4-methyl 1-pentene, 1-heptene and 1-octene. Any mixtures of these monomers can also be used. The term polymerisation here refers thus to both homopolymerisation and copolymerisation. Alpha-olefinic comonomers comprising 3 to 10 carbon atoms other than those mentioned above can also be used.


According to another embodiment the polyolefin grades are multimodal polyolefin grades, that is, different resins are formed in different reactors connected to each other in series. By multimodal, it is meant bimodal, trimodal etc. When multimodal polymers are manufactured, the method according to the invention can also be used in such a way that while the monomer feed into the first reactor is kept essentially constant, the amount of polymer formed in the second reactor is increased or decreased, depending on the required change of ratio of the two resins in the final polymer product.


In a particularly preferred embodiment, the invention relates to a method for making a transition in a polymerisation process wherein polyethylene, preferably bimodal polyethylene grades are prepared.


When ethylene and/or propylene are polymerised, the polymerisation process in the present invention is preferably carried out in the liquid phase (slurry process) or in the gas phase.


In the liquid slurry process, the liquid comprises ethylene and/or propylene, and where required one or more alpha-olefinic comonomers comprising from 3 to 10 carbon atoms, in an inert diluent. The comonomer may be selected from 1-butene, 1-hexene, 4-methyl 1-pentene, 1-heptene and 1-octene. The inert diluent is preferably isobutane. Other compounds such as a metal alkyl or hydrogen may be introduced into the polymerisation reaction to regulate activity and polymer properties such as melt flow index. In one preferred process of the present invention, the polymerisation process is carried out in two loop reactors, preferably in two liquid-full loop reactors, also known as a double loop reactor.


The method of the invention is also suitable for olefin gas phase polymerisations. The gas phase polymerisation can be performed in two or more fluid bed or agitated bed reactors. The gas phase comprises ethylene and/or propylene, and if required an alpha-olefinic comonomer comprising 3 to 10 carbon atoms, such as 1-butene, 1-hexene, 4-methyl-1-pentene, 1-octene or mixtures thereof as well as inert gas such as nitrogen. Optionally a metal alkyl can also be injected into the polymerisation medium, as well as other reaction controlling agents such as hydrogen or oxygen. Optionally a hydrocarbon-diluent such as pentane, isopentane, hexane, isohexane, cyclohexane or mixtures thereof can be used.


In the case of transitions of polyethylene grades, during a transition, a parameter that can be changed is, for example, the amount of hexene injected in the first reactor, which can vary between 10 and 120 kg/t of polymer produced. Moreover, the ethylene off-gas (in the first reactor and second reactors) can vary by up to 20%. The ratio of hydrogen injection to off-gas (mostly in the second reactor) can vary by up to 35%, the reactor temperature by approximately up to 5% and the reactor ratio (tons made in second reactor vs. first reactor) by up to 10%. These values are only given as a general indication and it is clear to a person skilled in the art which values should be used for any given transition.


More stability can be obtained if the monomer off-gas/monomer feed in the first reactor is kept constant, that is, the other injections (for example, hydrogen, comonomer, etc.) are dosed as a ratio to the monomer. Keeping the flow of monomer i.e. the monomer feed constant thus enables changes in injection of the other parameters to be done without major disturbances and fluctuations.


As an example, it can be mentioned that when a transition according to the prior art is made in a polymerisation process having a production rate of approximately 30 t/h, the amount of off-specification that is formed is about 200-500 t and the time required is about 12-20 hours. With the method according to the present invention, these values can be reduced down to 100 t of off-specification and 8 hours in transition time.


EXAMPLES

The following examples demonstrate the invention in relation to the transition of a Ziegler-Natta polyethylene from a Grade A to a Grade B during a continuous polymerisation process in two liquid-full loop reactors R1 and R2 connected to each other in series (double loop reactor). The first transition was carried out according to the prior art, where the monomer feed in the first reactor R1 was not constant. The second transition was carried out according to the invention. Table 1 shows the specifications set for each grade.












TABLE 1







Grade A
Grade B




















MI 5 range/g/10 min
0.40-0.55
1.87-2.53



Density range/g/cm3
0.947-0.949
0.958-0.960










The comonomer hexene was added in both transitions at a constant rate of 0.00346 kg/hr into both reactors. The temperature in the first reactor R1 was maintained at a temperature of about 87° C. and the temperature in the second reactor R2 was maintained at about 95° C. in both transitions. The pressure was maintained at 4.2 MPa in R1 and at about 4 MPa in R2. The transition was taken to start from the moment the hydrogen feed was changed with the intention of obtaining polymer Grade B.


The density was measured according to the method of standard test ASTM 1505 at a temperature of 23° C. The melt index M15 was measured according to the method of standard test ASTM D 1238 under a load of 5 kg and at a temperature of 190° C.


Prior Art Example

The transition started at time 0 h 00, which is the time that the hydrogen feed was first increased with the intention of producing the second polymer Grade B. At this point Grade A was still being produced on-specification. The desired Grade B was obtained 19 hours and 30 minutes later. The feeds and product properties are indicated in Table 2 below.









TABLE 2







Prior art transition














Monomer
Monomer
Hydrogen
Hydrogen





feed in 1st
feed in 2nd
feed in 1st
feed in 2nd
Product
Product melt


Time/
reactor/
reactor/
reactor/
reactor/
density/
flow index/


h:min
kg/h
kg/h
kg/h
kg/h
g/cm3
g/10 min





0:00
7127
7354
103
13
0.9472
0.414


0:15
7119
7395
319
13
0.9472
0.414


0:30
7110
7424
377
13
0.9472
0.414


0:45
7102
7465
379
13
0.9472
0.414


1:00
7093
7463
382
13
0.9472
0.544


1:15
7085
7492
385
13
0.9472
0.544


1:30
7076
7500
380
13
0.9472
0.544


1:45
7067
7550
383
13
0.9472
0.682


2:00
7045
7561
396
13
0.9485
0.682


2:15
7022
7606
389
13
0.9485
0.682


2:30
6998
7609
384
13
0.9485
0.682


2:45
6975
7657
385
13
0.9485
0.682


3:00
6951
7658
380
15
0.9485
0.682


3:15
6928
7714
380
16
0.9485
1.096


3:30
6914
7714
386
16
0.9485
1.096


3:45
6900
7728
379
16
0.9485
1.096


4:00
6886
7718
376
16
0.9508
1.096


4:15
6872
7769
375
16
0.9508
1.739


4:30
6839
7878
378
15
0.9508
1.739


4:45
6642
7705
373
14
0.9508
1.739


5:00
6767
7947
370
14
0.9535
1.739


5:15
6880
7903
382
14
0.9535
2.761


5:30
6650
7836
367
13
0.9535
2.761


5:45
6648
7873
368
12
0.9535
2.761


6:00
6646
7865
369
12
0.9558
2.761


6:15
6644
7845
365
12
0.9558
2.761


6:30
6750
7878
366
11
0.9558
3.620


6:45
6773
7850
372
11
0.9558
3.620


7:00
6699
7877
369
11
0.9545
3.620


7:15
6685
7859
368
12
0.9545
4.003


7:30
6645
7868
367
12
0.9545
4.003


7:45
6652
7836
365
13
0.9545
4.003


8:00
6769
7860
370
13
0.9566
4.003


8:15
6778
7861
371
14
0.9566
3.765


8:30
6761
7886
369
14
0.9566
3.765


8:45
6744
7866
368
15
0.9566
3.765


9:00
6727
7850
373
15
0.9579
3.765


9:15
6710
7863
366
15
0.9579
3.728


9:30
6693
7862
365
16
0.9579
3.728


9:45
6680
7855
366
16
0.9579
3.728


10:00 
6689
7853
365
16
0.9585
3.728


10:15 
6697
7856
366
16
0.9585
3.810


10:30 
6706
7859
369
16
0.9585
3.810


10:45 
6715
7870
370
16
0.9585
3.810


11:00 
6651
7901
367
16
0.9585
3.810


11:15 
6745
7888
357
16
0.9585
3.680


11:30 
6737
7867
351
16
0.9585
3.680


11:45 
6729
7850
348
16
0.9587
3.680


12:00 
6721
7861
348
16
0.9587
3.680


12:15 
6713
7862
348
16
0.9587
3.620


12:30 
6704
7852
343
15
0.9587
3.620


12:45 
6694
7862
340
15
0.9587
3.620


13:00 
6685
7865
342
15
0.9587
3.620


13:15 
6675
7864
341
15
0.9587
3.805


13:30 
6665
7846
340
14
0.9587
3.805


13:45 
6656
7850
340
14
0.9587
3.805


14:00 
6646
7850
342
14
0.9595
3.805


14:15 
6636
7853
338
14
0.9595
3.805


14:30 
6645
7850
339
13
0.9595
3.690


14:45 
6660
7862
339
13
0.9595
3.690


15:00 
6675
7851
342
13
0.9595
3.690


15:15 
6689
7849
342
13
0.9595
3.620


15:30 
6704
7847
335
13
0.9595
3.620


15:45 
6719
7858
329
13
0.9595
3.620


16:00 
6734
7853
329
14
0.9595
3.620


16:15 
6749
7858
326
14
0.9595
3.620


16:30 
6745
7835
324
14
0.9595
3.150


16:45 
6737
7849
322
14
0.9595
3.150


17:00 
6729
7849
322
15
0.9595
3.150


17:15 
6721
7856
313
15
0.9595
3.150


17:30 
6712
7848
309
15
0.9595
2.841


17:45 
6692
7866
306
15
0.9595
2.841


18:00 
6671
7863
294
15
0.9595
2.841


18:15 
6649
7869
290
15
0.9595
2.841


18:30 
6627
7814
288
15
0.9595
2.841


18:45 
6539
7674
282
15
0.9595
2.841


19:00 
6777
8158
287
16
0.9595
2.841


19:15 
6696
7944
287
16
0.9595
2.841


19:30 
6657
7888
277
16
0.9595
2.520










FIG. 1 shows the monomer feed in reactor R1. The average monomer feed in R1 during the transition was calculated as 6772 kg/h. The dashed grey lines at 6705 kg/h and 6840 kg/h show the average monomer feed at −1% and +1% respectively. This shows that the feed into the first reactor was not within these limits and hence was not constant. The transition took 19 hours and 30 minutes to proceed to completion. A total amount of 457 tons of product off-specification was produced.


Example According to the Invention

The transition started at time 0 h 00, which is the time that the hydrogen feed was first increased with the intention of producing the second polymer Grade B. At this point Grade A was still being produced on-specification. The desired Grade B was obtained from time 14 h 15 onwards. The feeds and product properties are indicated in Table 3 below.









TABLE 3







Transition according to the invention














Monomer
Monomer
Hydrogen
Hydrogen





feed in 1st
feed in 2nd
feed in 1st
feed in 2nd
Product
Product melt


Time/
reactor/
reactor/
reactor/
reactor/
density/
flow index/


h:min
kg/h
kg/h
kg/h
kg/h
g/cm3
g/10 min





0:00
15780
16540
194
25
0.9483
0.575


0:15
15658
16680
247
25
0.9486
0.553


0:30
15792
16790
277
25
0.9486
0.553


0:45
15849
16827
301
25
0.9486
0.553


1:00
15759
16887
310
25
0.9486
0.553


1:15
15782
16893
326
25
0.9495
0.674


1:30
15745
16989
388
25
0.9495
0.674


1:45
15829
17021
424
25
0.9495
0.674


2:00
15768
17246
451
24
0.9495
0.674


2:15
15768
17287
465
24
0.9481
0.555


2:30
15619
17317
476
24
0.9481
0.555


2:45
15709
17354
495
24
0.9481
0.555


3:00
15766
17334
495
24
0.9481
0.555


3:15
15741
17348
495
23
0.9503
0.864


3:30
15724
17327
495
23
0.9503
0.864


3:45
15760
17332
495
23
0.9503
0.864


4:00
15751
17341
495
23
0.9503
0.864


4:15
15735
17332
495
23
0.9536
1.402


4:30
15733
17313
495
23
0.9536
1.402


4:45
15852
17339
495
22
0.9536
1.402


5:00
15783
17353
495
22
0.9536
1.402


5:15
15852
17311
495
22
0.9541
1.895


5:30
15765
17337
495
22
0.9541
1.895


5:45
15673
17322
495
22
0.9541
1.895


6:00
15616
17330
495
22
0.9541
1.895


6:15
15773
17345
495
22
0.9541
1.796


6:30
15770
17331
495
23
0.9541
1.796


6:45
15646
17299
495
23
0.9541
1.796


7:00
15829
17334
495
24
0.9541
1.796


7:15
15740
17332
495
25
0.9558
2.137


7:30
15703
17299
495
26
0.9558
2.137


7:45
15818
17347
495
26
0.9558
2.137


8:00
15677
17340
495
27
0.9558
2.137


8:15
15788
17318
495
27
0.9562
1.809


8:30
15787
17329
495
27
0.9562
1.809


8:45
15817
17327
495
27
0.9562
1.809


9:00
15767
17328
495
28
0.9562
1.809


9:15
15667
17328
495
28
0.9566
2.128


9:30
15754
17325
495
28
0.9566
2.128


9:45
15720
17330
495
29
0.9566
2.128


10:00 
15765
17328
495
28
0.9566
2.128


10:15 
15780
17354
495
28
0.9559
2.160


10:30 
15751
17329
495
28
0.9559
2.160


10:45 
15795
17334
495
28
0.9559
2.160


11:00 
15687
17313
495
28
0.9559
2.160


11:15 
15802
17344
495
28
0.9570
2.175


11:30 
15759
17329
495
28
0.9570
2.175


11:45 
15768
17322
495
28
0.9570
2.175


12:00 
15730
17339
495
28
0.9570
2.175


12:15 
15759
17334
495
28
0.9570
2.165


12:30 
15797
17351
495
28
0.9570
2.165


12:45 
15737
17338
495
28
0.9573
2.165


13:00 
15803
17333
495
28
0.9573
2.165


13:15 
15856
17317
495
28
0.9573
2.158


13:30 
15812
17328
495
28
0.9573
2.158


13:45 
15791
17322
495
28
0.9573
2.158


14:00 
15820
17313
495
28
0.9573
2.158


14:15 
15810
17349
495
28
0.9579
2.219










FIG. 2 shows the monomer feed in reactor R1. The average monomer feed in R1 during the transition was calculated as 15757 kg/h. The dashed grey lines at 15599 kg/h and 15914 kg/h show the average monomer feed at −1% and +1% respectively. This shows that the feed into the first reactor was constant, the feed not changing by more than 1% during the transition with respect to the overall average feed during the transition.


The transition was 14 hours and 15 minutes long. A total amount of 122 tons of product off-specification was produced. The invented method hence reduced the transition time from 19 hours and 30 minutes to 14 hours and 15 minutes and reduced the production of off-specification from 457 tons to 122 tons, despite the fact that the feed of the monomer was over twice that of the prior art example.

Claims
  • 1-8. (canceled)
  • 9. A method of transition between polyolefin grades in a polymerisation process comprising: polymerising at least one monomer in at least a first reactor and a second reactor connected to each other in series, wherein olefin monomer is fed into the first reactor at an essentially constant rate during a transition between the first reactor and the second reactor.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the olefin monomer comprises ethylene.
  • 11. The method of claim 9, wherein the first reactor and the second reactor comprise loop reactors.
  • 12. The method of claim 9, wherein the feed of monomer into the first reactor is changed by at most 5% in relation to an average monomer feed in the first reactor of the transition during the transition.
  • 13. The method of claim 9, wherein the feed of monomer into the first reactor is changed by at most 2% in relation to an average monomer feed in the first reactor of the transition during the transition.
  • 14. The method of claim 9, wherein the polymerization occurs in the presence of a Ziegler-Natta catalyst.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
06112036.6 Mar 2006 EP regional
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/EP2007/052985 3/28/2007 WO 00 9/17/2009