Example embodiments relate to a method and a system for making an elevator.
The capability of the traction sheave of an elevator to transmit motion to the elevator hoisting ropes, as well as its capability to brake the rope, in other words, the grip between the traction sheave and the hoisting ropes, is substantially dependent on the length of the arc of contact between the hoisting ropes and the traction sheave and on the force with which the hoisting ropes are pressed against the traction sheave. In prior art, traction sheave elevator solutions are known in which the arc length used has been increased, e.g. by using a so-called Double Wrap roping arrangement or using an elevator car and counterweight of a relatively large weight in combination with the very common Single Wrap roping arrangement. In general, Double Wrap roping is used if it unreasonable to increase the weight of the hoisting cage and counterweight. For example, in fast elevators for a large hoisting height, it is more reasonable to improve the grip instead of increasing the moving masses. This type of fast elevators for a large hoisting height often also have compensating ropes or equivalent, which increase the weight of the moving masses while compensating the imbalance caused by the weight of the rope portions going to the elevator car and to the counterweight. In slower elevators designed for a lower hoisting height, a simple way of increasing the grip is to increase the weight of the car and counterweight. As a practical consequence of this, the starting points in the design of different elevators are very different and the final product ranges are at least to some degree non-uniform. Especially in slower elevators, relatively heavy elevator cars are needed even for small nominal loads.
One of the object of the invention is to reduce the diversity of components in the process of delivery of different elevators. Example embodiments disclose a method wherein Single Wrap or Double Wrap roping is selected depending on whether the elevator car is heavy or light, and a delivery system wherein Single Wrap or Double Wrap roping is selected depending on whether the elevator car is heavy or light.
The grip between the ropes and the traction sheave is improved by increasing the rope angle. Double Wrap roping increases the rope angle by using a secondary sheave, providing an angle of contact between the traction sheave and the ropes that is typically 180 degrees larger than in a conventional Single Wrap solution with a rope angle of 180 degrees. In both Single Wrap and Double Wrap roping solutions, the rope angle may sometimes differ considerably from these values (180, 360 degrees), but for the invention an important consideration is the use of a good grip achieved by Double Wrap roping to enable a light-weight elevator and, in cases where a sufficient grip is achieved otherwise due to a heavy elevator, to allow elevators to be made using a substantially identical configuration.
In the Double Wrap roping arrangement, the hoisting ropes are passed twice around the traction sheave. In Double Wrap roping, the number of rope grooves on the traction sheave must naturally be twice the number of ropes used. On the other hand, a light-weight elevator does not require so many ropes to support the elevator car as a heavy elevator does. In a Single Wrap roping arrangement, a rope sheave, preferably of equal size with the traction sheave, functions as a so-called “tangential contact wheel”, guiding the ropes and dampening their vibrations.
In Single Wrap roping, the rope sheave functions as a tangential contact wheel for the ropes going downward towards the car and counterweight and at the same time as a rope dampening wheel smoothing out rope vibrations. The ropes are passed once around the traction sheave and they only touch the rope sheave tangentially. In Double Wrap roping, the ropes are passed two and/or more times around the traction sheave at least once around the rope sheave. In Double Wrap roping, too, the rope sheave also functions as a rope dampening wheel.
By increasing the angle of contact, the rope sheave can be used to increase the grip between the traction sheave and the hoisting ropes. In this manner, the weight and size of the car and counterweight can be reduced, thus increasing the space saving potential of the elevator. Alternatively or at the same time, it is possible to reduce the weight of the elevator car in relation to the weight of the counterweight. An angle of contact of over 180° between the traction sheave and the hoisting rope is achieved by utilizing a rope sheave or rope sheaves.
For example, when a public building needs to be provided with several elevators, some of which are for personal use and some for service use, it is very practical and economical, by simply changing the roping, to provide all the elevators with identical traction or rope sheaves and identical machines. A modular construction and the circumstance that the decision regarding the implementation of the roping of the elevator can be made at the site of installation is logistically very economical. In the case of modernization, too, it is economical e.g. to replace a plastic carpet with a stone floor, thus making the elevator car considerably heavier, and consequently it is only necessary to change the roping between the traction sheave and the rope sheave and increase the load-bearing capacity of the hoisting ropes by increasing the number of ropes.
An example embodiment of the elevator of the invention is an elevator without machine room and without above, in which the drive machine is provided with a coated traction sheave. The angle of contact between the hoisting ropes and the traction sheave of the elevator is greater than 180°. The elevator comprises a unit containing a mounting base with the drive machine, the traction sheave and a rope sheave fitted on it.
By using the invention, the following advantages can be achieved, among others:
An area of application of the invention is elevators designed for the transportation of people or freight. Another area of application of the invention is passenger elevators whose speed range is conventionally about 1.0 m/s or higher but may also e.g. only about 0.5 m/s. In the case of freight elevators, too, the speed is preferably at least about 0.5 m/s, although with greater loads even lower speeds may be used.
In the following, the invention will be described in detail by the aid of a few examples of its embodiments with reference to the attached drawings, wherein
The drive machine 105 placed in the elevator shaft is preferably of flat construction, in other words, the machine has a small thickness dimension as compared with its width and/or height, or at least the machine is slim enough to be accommodated between the elevator car and a wall of the elevator shaft. The machine may also be placed differently, e.g. by disposing the slim machine partly or completely between an imaginary extension of the elevator car and a shaft wall. The elevator shaft is advantageously provided with equipment required for the supply of power to the motor driving the traction sheave 106 as well as equipment needed for elevator control, both of which can be placed in a common instrument panel 107 or mounted separately from each other or integrated partly or wholly with the drive machine 105. The drive machine may be of geared or gearless type.
The drive machine 205 placed in the elevator shaft is preferably of flat construction, in other words, the machine has a small thickness dimension as compared with its width and/or height, or at least the machine is slim enough to be accommodated between the elevator car and a wall of the elevator shaft. The machine may also be placed differently, e.g. by disposing the slim machine partly or completely between an imaginary extension of the elevator car and a shaft wall. The elevator shaft is advantageously provided with equipment required for the supply of power to the motor driving the traction sheave 206, both of which can be placed in a common instrument panel 207 or mounted separately from each other or integrated partly or wholly with the drive machine 205. The drive machine may be of geared or gearless type.
The hoisting ropes run as follows: One end of the ropes is fixed to an anchorage 312 in the upper part of the shaft, from where they go downward to the counterweight 302. The counterweight is suspended on the ropes 303 via a rope sheave 309. From the counterweight, the ropes go further upward to a first rope sheave 305 mounted on an elevator guide rail 310, and from the rope sheave 305 further via the rope grooves of rope sheave 314 to the traction sheave 307 driven by the drive machine 306. From the traction sheave, the ropes go again upwards to rope sheave 314, and having wrapped around it they go back to the traction sheave 307. From the traction sheave 307, the ropes go again upwards via the rope grooves of rope sheave 314 to rope sheave 304, and having wrapped around this sheave they pass via rope sheaves 308 mounted on the top of the elevator car and then go further to an anchorage 313 in the upper part of the elevator shaft, where the other end of the hoisting ropes is fixed. The elevator car is suspended on the hoisting ropes 303 by means of rope sheaves 308. In the hoisting ropes 303, one or more of the rope portions between the rope sheaves or between the rope sheaves and the traction sheave or between the rope sheaves and the anchorages may deviate from an exact vertical direction, a circumstance that makes it easy to provide a sufficient distance between different rope portions or a sufficient distance between the hoisting ropes and the other elevator components. The traction sheave 307 and the hoisting machine 306 are preferably disposed somewhat aside of the path of movement of the elevator car 301 as well as that of the counterweight 302, so they can be easily placed almost at any height in the elevator shaft below the rope sheaves 304 and 305. If the machine is not placed directly above or below the counterweight or elevator car, this will allow a saving in shaft height. In this case, the minimum height of the elevator shaft is exclusively determined on the basis of the length of the paths of the counterweight and elevator car and the safety clearances needed above and below these. In addition, a smaller space at the top or bottom of the shaft will be sufficient due to the reduced rope sheave diameters as compared with earlier solutions, depending on how the rope sheaves are mounted on the elevator car and/or on the frame of the elevator car.
An advantageous solution is to build a complete unit comprising a mounting base carrying both a pre-fitted elevator drive machine with a traction sheave and a rope sheave for increasing the angle of contact and its bearings, fitted in a correct operating angle relative to the traction sheave. The mounting base defines the mutual position and/or distance between the traction sheave and the rope sheave. This unit can be mounted in place as a unitary aggregate in the same way as a drive machine. The drive machine may be fixed to a wall of the elevator shaft, to the ceiling, to a guide rail or guide rails or to some other structure, such as a beam or frame. In the case of an elevator with machine below, a further possibility is to mount the machine on the bottom of the elevator shaft.
It is obvious to the person skilled in the art that different embodiments of the invention are not limited to the examples described above, but that they may be varied within the scope of the following claims. For instance, the number of times the hoisting ropes are passed between the upper part of the elevator shaft and the counterweight or elevator car is not a very decisive question as regards the basic advantages of the invention, although it is possible to achieve some additional advantages by using multiple rope passages. In general, embodiments should be so implemented that the ropes go to the elevator car at most as many times as to the counterweight. It is also obvious that the hoisting ropes need not necessarily be passed under the car; instead, they may also be passed over or sideways past the elevator car.
In accordance with the examples described above, the skilled person can vary the embodiment of the invention, while the traction sheaves and rope sheaves, instead of being coated metal sheaves, may also be uncoated metal sheaves or uncoated sheaves made of some other material suited to the purpose. It is also obvious that the metallic traction sheaves and rope sheaves used in the invention, which are coated with a non-metallic material at least in the area of their grooves, may be implemented using a coating material consisting of e.g. rubber, polyurethane or some other material suited to the purpose.
It is also obvious to the skilled person that the design of the bearings may vary depending on the load and the intended use. It is also obvious that, instead of using ropes with a filler, the roping arrangement of the invention may be implemented using ropes without filler, either lubricated or unlubricated. The ropes may be twisted in many different ways, and they may be thin or thick or of some other size and they may be of a substantially round or some other shape in cross-section.
It is also obvious to the person skilled in the art that the elevator car, the counterweight and the machine unit maybe laid out in the cross-section of the elevator shaft in a manner differing from the lay-out described in the examples. Such a different lay-out might be e.g. one in which the machine and the counterweight are located behind the car as seen from the shaft door and the ropes are passed under the car diagonally relative to the bottom of the car. Passing the ropes under the car in a diagonal or otherwise oblique direction relative to the form of the bottom provides an advantage when the suspension of the car on the ropes is to be made symmetrical relative to the center of mass of the elevator in other types of suspension lay-out as well.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20020996 | May 2002 | FI | national |
This application is a continuation of, and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 and 35 U.S.C. §365(c) from, PCT International Application No. PCT/FI03/00394 which has an International filing date of May 23, 2003, which designated the United States of America and which claims priority on FINLAND Application Priority Number 20020996 filed May 28, 2002, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4013142 | Hagg | Mar 1977 | A |
4842101 | Lamb | Jun 1989 | A |
5957242 | Suter et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6035974 | Richter et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
20050006180 | Mustalahti | Jan 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 578 237 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0578237 | Jan 1994 | EP |
1 327 598 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1327598 | Jul 2003 | EP |
20020043 | Jul 2003 | FI |
2 640 604 | Jun 1990 | FR |
954319 | Apr 1964 | GB |
WO 9943595 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO9943595 | Sep 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050087398 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/FI03/00394 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 10965821 | US |