The disclosure generally relates to joints for composite structures and more particularly, relates to methods for making highly weight-efficient, mechanically-fastened joint fittings and joining the fittings to composite sandwich shell edges.
Sandwich construction shells, in which facesheets are joined by a shear-carrying core, are the minimum weight solution for a wide range of structures. Composite materials such as graphite/epoxy may be used to make lighter structures than the metals that were formerly applied to most weight-critical structures. Joint designs have been lagging behind the development of the acreage areas of these structures.
Joining approaches that have been traditionally used for metal structures may not be applied unmodified to composite structures because of the lack of ductility in composites and limited bearing capability of thin composite facesheets. Sandwich structures may present further challenges since the facesheet-to-core bond may be compromised in combined shear and peel if subjected to concentrated loads. The state of the art attempts to avoid these problems by transitioning from sandwich construction to thick solid laminates at the edge of the shell and then using a metal joint member 15 which can be fastened conventionally by bolts 16. This is shown in
An additional shortcoming associated with many conventional sandwich edge joints is that the joints may transition to an asymmetrical flange configuration which may cause tension loads across the joint to put the adjacent shell in bending. To carry these secondary bending loads in addition to the primary in-plane loads, it may be necessary to locally reinforce the shell. This may add additional weight that may not be required in a joint structure with straighter load paths.
Coefficient of thermal expansion mismatch between metal joint elements and adjacent composites may result in additional stresses in the structure. For structures which are exposed to wide ranges of temperatures, such as launch vehicle components, substantial weight penalties may be imposed by the need to either reinforce the structure to carry these mismatch loads or soften the structure radially to mitigate strain mismatch.
Therefore, a method for making a highly weight-efficient, combination bonded and mechanically-fastened joint configuration for composite sandwich shell edges is needed.
The disclosure is directed to a method for making a highly weight-efficient, combination bonded and mechanically-fastened composite sandwich shell edge joint. An illustrative embodiment of the method includes providing an outboard buildup pad, providing an inboard buildup pad that is spaced-apart and adjacent to the outboard buildup pad, bonding an outboard facesheet to the outboard buildup pad, bonding an inboard facesheet to the inboard buildup pad, providing bridging plies connecting the inboard buildup pad and the outboard buildup pad and mounting at least one barrel nut installed in the buildup pads.
The disclosure is further directed to a method for joining fittings to a composite sandwich shell edge. An illustrative embodiment of the method includes laying up an inner facesheet and positioning a wrapped flute mandrel on top; applying a layer of adhesive on the inner facesheet and positioning spacer-supported fittings on top; applying adhesive over the co-bonded fittings and laying up an outer facesheet forming an assembly; curing the assembly under heat and pressure; removing the fittings by first collapsing the spacers and removing the flute mandrel; placing an adhesive layer on the fittings with collapsible spacers inserted therein; reinserting the fittings between the inner and outer facesheets and effecting bonding and curing; and removing the spacers from the fittings by collapsing the spacers.
In an alternate embodiment, the method for fabricating a composite sandwich shell edge joint may include the use of fluorocarbon spacer bars in place of the fittings to form the fitting cavity during the cure of the facesheets and core. This embodiment has the advantage of reducing the risk of mark-off on the facesheets by placing fewer inches of edge against the facesheet during cure. The counterbalancing disadvantage is that the geometry of the fluorocarbon spacer bars must be carefully controlled and adequate caul strips provided at the joints between blocks to prevent a larger scale mark-off problem at the joints between blocks.
The features, functions, and advantages that have been discussed can be achieved independently in various embodiments of the present disclosure or may be combined in yet other embodiments further details of which can be seen with reference to the following description and drawings.
The following detailed description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the described embodiments or the application and uses of the described embodiments. As used herein, the word “exemplary” or “illustrative” means “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any implementation described herein as “exemplary” or “illustrative” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other implementations. All of the implementations described below are exemplary implementations provided to enable persons skilled in the art to make or use the invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the claims. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any expressed or implied theory presented in the preceding technical field, background, brief summary or the following detailed description.
Referring now to
As shown in
As further shown in
The composite outboard tapered buildup pad 5 and inboard tapered buildup pad 6 of the joint body 2 may be configured to efficiently transfer load from the barrel nut 14 to the outboard facesheet 3 and the inboard facesheet 4. Fabrication methods may provide good clamp-up pressure to the film adhesive bondlines between the buildup pads 5, 6 and facesheets 3, 4. A thin, uniform, bondline is stronger than a thick bondline or one with varying thickness across the bond.
Overall pad width of each buildup pad 5, 6, as shown in
Each buildup pad 5, 6 may be thickest in the area where the barrel nut 14 is installed and may taper toward the edges. The thin edges on the build-up pads 5, 6 may reduce shear peaking to maximize attainable bonded joint strength. Fluted cores, for example and without limitation, may be a good candidate for launch vehicle composite sandwich structures because of their suitability for pre-launch purging.
Solid laminate may be required across the section in which each barrel nut 14 is installed. This may be obtained by placing the bridging plies 7 between the two buildup pads 5, 6. Since the bridging plies 7 may pick up only a small fraction of the load transmitted through the barrel nut 14, the joints between the bridging plies 7 and the buildup pads 5, 6 may be less critical than the bonded joints between the buildup pads 5, 6 and the facesheets 3, 4.
The fabrication process for the fittings used in the present disclosure composite sandwich shell edge joint is shown in
The various processing steps for forming the fitting are further shown in
As shown in
Referring next to
Each of the processes of method 100 may be performed or carried out by a system integrator, a third party, and/or an operator (e.g., a customer). For the purposes of this description, a system integrator may include without limitation any number of aircraft manufacturers and major-system subcontractors; a third party may include without limitation any number of vendors, subcontractors, and suppliers; and an operator may be an airline, leasing company, military entity, service organization, and so on.
As shown in
The apparatus embodied herein may be employed during any one or more of the stages of the production and service method 100. For example, components or subassemblies corresponding to production process 106 may be fabricated or manufactured in a manner similar to components or subassemblies produced while the spacecraft 200 is in service. Also one or more apparatus embodiments may be utilized during the production stages 106 and 108, for example, by substantially expediting assembly of or reducing the cost of a spacecraft 200. Similarly, one or more apparatus embodiments may be utilized while the spacecraft 200 is in service, for example and without limitation, to maintenance and service 114.
Although the embodiments of this disclosure have been described with respect to certain exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the specific embodiments are for purposes of illustration and not limitation, as other variations will occur to those of skill in the art.
This patent arises from a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/950,191, filed Nov. 19, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,784,596, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/950,144, filed Nov. 19, 2010, and entitled “Composite Sandwich Shell Edge Joint.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1561102 | Mott | Nov 1925 | A |
1575681 | Griffiths | Mar 1926 | A |
3011674 | Jackson | Dec 1961 | A |
3285794 | Brownlee et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3487971 | Kirgis et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3680727 | Pearson | Aug 1972 | A |
3842775 | Edwards et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3979350 | Winter | Sep 1976 | A |
4050609 | Okamoto et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4106424 | Schuler et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4343413 | Chatzipetros et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4672906 | Asai | Jun 1987 | A |
4731151 | Kaller et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4824513 | Dodds | Apr 1989 | A |
4842670 | Callis et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4937032 | Krone et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5024399 | Barquet et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5085343 | Scarr | Feb 1992 | A |
5129534 | Dunn | Jul 1992 | A |
5143328 | Leonard | Sep 1992 | A |
5171510 | Barquet et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5257761 | Ratz et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5651474 | Callaghan et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5709252 | Princiotta et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5776277 | Wambeke | Jul 1998 | A |
5817269 | Younie et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6082676 | Cochran | Jul 2000 | A |
6158605 | DeLay | Dec 2000 | A |
6802169 | Simmons | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7093337 | Taylor | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7540143 | Greene | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7640961 | Stubner et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7669729 | Matsuoka et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7699188 | Oliveira et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7998299 | McCarville | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8484848 | Gallant | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8784596 | Hand et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8815038 | McCarville | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8875931 | Hand et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20020023926 | Dhellemmes | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20040025955 | Skinner et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040183227 | Velicki et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050126699 | Yen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050260481 | Finkelshtain et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060115324 | Zenda et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060225265 | Burnett et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080129041 | Allen | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090285652 | Williams | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100043955 | Hornick | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100065688 | Wood | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100132884 | Baehmann | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100143148 | Chen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110067795 | Hancock | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120045606 | Griess | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120125530 | Hand et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120128408 | Hand et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130129409 | Cho | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1501704 | Apr 1969 | DE |
2421936 | Nov 1975 | DE |
19607061 | May 1997 | DE |
102009015612 | Oct 2010 | DE |
1657453 | May 2006 | EP |
2236725 | Feb 1975 | FR |
2054791 | Feb 1981 | GB |
2001032372 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2009038925 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009109619 | Sep 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,191, Jul. 20, 2012, 19 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,191, Jan. 31, 2013, 16 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,191, Apr. 30, 2012, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report, for EP Patent Application Serial No. 11188622.2, issued on May 23, 2012, (9 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,144, Feb. 27, 2014, 15 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,144, Sep. 25, 2013, 16 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,144, Jun. 18, 2012, 20 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,144, Dec. 19, 2012, 26 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,144, Mar. 8, 2012, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,191, Mar. 6, 2014, 18 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,144, mailed on Aug. 12, 2014, 34 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report”, issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 11189988.6, issued on Jan. 18, 2016, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/502,018, mailed on Jul. 12, 2016, 39 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/502,018, mailed on Sep. 30, 2016, 19 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140352876 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12950191 | Nov 2010 | US |
Child | 14298395 | US |