The present disclosure relates to lasers and, in particular, to quantum cascade laser and related methods.
Quantum cascade lasers (QCLs) differ from traditional semiconductor diode lasers in that they do not use a p-n junction for light emission. Multiple active regions are “cascaded” so that each injected electron can emit multiple photons and therefore enhance laser gain. Each active region includes a multi-layered semiconductor material structure. This multi-layered semiconductor material structure is designed to have an electronic band structure that gives the desired emission wavelength, and is manufactured with nanometer-level thickness control.
Most commercially available QCLs are of the “edge-emitting” variety. In these, linear ridges are created by etching vertically through the layered structure, which has been grown on a wafer substrate. These are cleaved so that the active region comprises a rectangular ridge several millimeters in length, which forms a waveguide. The laser radiation is amplified by passing back and forth along the axis of the ridge. Laser emission occurs on the end facets of these ridges.
Generally speaking, a QCL may include a substrate and semiconductor layers adjacent the substrate and defining an active region. The active region may have a longitudinal axis canted at an oblique angle to the at least one emitting facet of the laser chip. The QCL may include an optical grating being adjacent the active region and configured to emit one of a continuous wave (CW) laser output or a pulsed laser output through the at least one emitting facet.
In some embodiments, the optical grating may define a plurality of ridges substantially parallel with the longitudinal axis of the active region. For example, the optical grating may comprise a Bragg grating. The active region may be configured to operate in a single lateral mode.
Additionally, the optical grating may comprise a shallow ridge configuration grating with etching stopped before reaching the active region and the QCL may include an electrical contact strip coupled to the semiconductor layers. The electrical contact strip may have a width configured to control an effective active region width.
Also, the active region may have a thickness less than or equal to 1.3 μm, and the active region may have a width greater than or equal to 20 μm. The active region may have an elongate shape extending laterally across the substrate.
Another aspect is directed to a QCL system. The QCL system may include at least one QCL comprising a substrate, at least one emitting facet, and semiconductor layers adjacent the substrate and defining an active region. The active region may have a longitudinal axis canted at an oblique angle to the at least one emitting face of the substrate. The at least one QCL may comprise an optical grating being adjacent the active region and configured to emit one of a CW laser output or a pulsed laser output through the at least one emitting facet. The QCL system may include a driver circuit coupled to the at least one QCL. In some embodiments, the at least one QCL may include an array thereof arranged in W-shape.
Another aspect is directed to a method for making a QCL. The method may include forming a substrate and at least one emitting facet, and forming a semiconductor layers adjacent the substrate and defining an active region. The active region may have a longitudinal axis canted at an oblique angle to the at least one emitting facet of the substrate. The method may comprise forming an optical grating being adjacent the active region and configured to emit one of a CW laser output or a pulsed laser output through the at least one emitting facet.
The present disclosure will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which several embodiments of the present disclosure are shown. This present disclosure may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the present disclosure to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and base 100 reference numerals are used to indicate similar elements in alternative embodiments.
Referring initially to
Referring now to
It was demonstrated for the traditional diode lasers that lateral beam quality for broad area devices can be controlled by employing the so-called α-DFB configuration (diagram 80
The operational principles of the α-DFB configuration can be illustrated using the ray-optics approximation. Ray propagation within the waveguide shown in
λ=2nΛA sin θ/m (1);
where n is the effective refractive index, Λ is the grating period, and θ is the angle between the facet and the waveguide axis. The waves that do not satisfy the Bragg condition easily leak outside the gain region and, therefore, have a low modal gain with a high threshold current density.
For the waves propagating forward from 0 to L, the angle between the grating and the ray propagation direction is θ. On the other hand, the reflected waves propagating backward from L to 2 L is incident on the grating at −θ. The resonance Bragg condition is satisfied both for the forward and backward propagating waves at the same time only for a single lateral mode. The α-DFB grating, therefore, serves as a spatial mode filter.
The α-DFB configuration has not been attempted for high average power QCLs for two main reasons:
1. The α-DFB configuration is an approach to scaling QCL optical power with active region dimensions without sacrificing beam quality. Broad area devices are of primary interest in this case. The active region self-heating for QCLs limits active region width for the traditional QCLs to 10-20 μm. Therefore, it appears that this configuration cannot be directly applied to QCLs to increase average optical power level.
A possible approach to the overheating problem was disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/450,575, filed on Mar. 6, 2017, assigned to the present applications assignee, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. In short, it is argued in that disclosure that QCLs with a significantly reduced active region thickness and increased maximum (roll over) current density can still produce a very high average optical power per active region unit area even in a broad area configuration. This requires designing QCLs with increased active region/injector coupling, increased active region doping density, and a higher relative carrier population for the lowest injector state.
It is proposed in this disclosure to use the QCLs with a low thermal resistance in the broad area α-DFB configuration. QCLs are traditionally processed into the deep-ridge configuration with the etching profile propagating though the active region (
It is proposed in this disclosure, instead, to use the shallow ridge configuration, shown in
The limiting case for the shallow ridge configuration is a simple contact-stripe configuration shown in
To summarize, the proposed approach herein includes: employment of ultra-thin active region with dramatically reduced thermal resistance; employment of shallow ridge or simple contact-stripe configuration to suppress mode reflection at the lateral active region/waveguide interface; and employment of the α-DFB grating for the spatial mode selection. The very high power QCLs will find immediate applications in a number of applications requiring high power, high brightness infrared laser sources. α-DFB QCLs can be combined into a W-shaped array as shown in
Referring now to
In the illustrated embodiment, the optical grating 123 defines a plurality of ridges substantially parallel (between 0 and 5 degrees of cant between the ridges and the longitudinal axis) with the longitudinal axis 127 of the active region 125. Also, in the illustrated example, the optical grating 123 comprises a Bragg grating, which permits the active region 125 to be configured to operate in a single spatial mode.
Also, the active region 125 may have a thickness less than or equal to 1.3 μm, and the active region may have a width greater than or equal to 20 μm. The active region 125 may have an elongate shape extending laterally across the substrate 124. Of course, these dimensional ranges are merely exemplary and could be different in other embodiments.
Another aspect is directed to a method for making a QCL 121. The method includes forming a substrate 124 and at least one emitting facet 126, and forming one or more semiconductor layers adjacent the substrate and defining an active region 125. The active region 125 has a longitudinal axis 127 canted at an oblique angle to the at least one emitting facet 126. The method comprises forming an optical grating 123 being adjacent the active region 125 and configured to emit a CW or pulsed laser output through the at least one emitting facet.
Referring now additionally to
Referring now additionally to
Referring now additionally to
Referring now to
Each of the plurality of QCLs 521a-521f may comprise one or more features from any of the QCL embodiments disclosed herein. Also, features from any of the individual QCL embodiments could be combined with other embodiments.
References (all references listed below are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties)
Many modifications and other embodiments of the present disclosure will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is understood that the present disclosure is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/677,572 filed on Aug. 15, 2017, which is based upon prior filed copending Provisional Application No. 62/375,044 filed Aug. 15, 2016, the entire subject matters of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4783788 | Gordon | Nov 1988 | A |
4791648 | Vojak et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4845725 | Welch et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4856017 | Ungar | Aug 1989 | A |
4942585 | Ungar | Jul 1990 | A |
5131002 | Mooradian | Jul 1992 | A |
5272711 | Mawst et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5323414 | Baird et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5337328 | Lang et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5590141 | Baird et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5675601 | Karakida et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5901168 | Baillargeon | May 1999 | A |
5995692 | Hamakawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014396 | Osinski et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6075801 | Tamanuki et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6167073 | Botez et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6239901 | Kaneko | May 2001 | B1 |
6256330 | LaComb | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6326646 | Baillargeon et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339606 | Alphonse | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6421363 | Osinski et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6459715 | Khalfin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477191 | Okada et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6580740 | Funabashi et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6594297 | Hayakawa | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6625182 | Kuksenkov et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6873638 | Haase et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6996152 | Vurgaftman et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7248618 | Volodin et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
8014430 | Patel et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8068524 | Patel et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8121164 | Lyakh et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
9077153 | Maulini et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9608408 | Lyakh et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
10008829 | Dougakiuchi et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10177535 | Lyakh | Jan 2019 | B1 |
20020135663 | Miyagawa | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040202218 | Thornton | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218652 | Spariosu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050083568 | Nakae et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20070223552 | Muendel et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090041061 | Shkunov et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090213890 | Patel et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20110305256 | Chann et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130010823 | Maulini et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20150103857 | Maulini et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160211647 | Olmsted | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160322788 | Lyakh et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0115390 | Aug 1994 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Robert J. Lang et al. “Theory of grating confined broad area lasers”, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 34 No. 11, Nov. 1998, pp. 2196-2210. (Year: 1998). |
Walpole, Semiconductor amplifiers and lasers with tapered gain regions, SpringerLink, Optical and Quantum Electronics, Jun. 1996, vol. 28, Issue 6, pp. 623-645, Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, USA. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Goldberg et al., High-power, near-diffraction-limited large-area traveling-wave semiconductor amplifiers, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 29 Issue: 6, pp. 2028-2043, Jun. 1993. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Welford et al., Observation of linewidth broadening in (GaAl)As diode lasers due to electron number fluctuations, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 40, Issue 7, 1982, Published online Jun. 1998. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Lee at al., High-average-power Nd:YAG planar waveguide laser that is face pumped by 10 laser diode bars, Optical Society of America (OSA) Publishing, Optics Letters, vol. 27, Issue 7, p. 524-526, 2002. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Chilla et al., Recent advances in optically pumped semiconductor lasers, Article in Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Feb. 2007. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Andrew M. Sarangan et al. “Spectral properties of angled-grating high-power semiconductor lasers” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 35, No. 8, Aug. 1999, pp. 1220-1230. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Robert J. Lang et al. “Theory of grating-confined broad-area lasers”, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 34, No. 11, Nov. 1998, pp. 2196-2210. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Dan Botez et al. “Tapered active-region, mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers for complete suppression of carrier-leakage currents” Proc. of SPIE vol. 8277, Feb. 2012, pp. 82770W-1-82770W-9. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Gmachl et al. “Continuous-wave and high-power pulsed operation index-coupled distributed feedback quantum cascade laser at λ≈ 8.5 μ m” Applied Physics Letters 1998 72:12, 1430-1432. Abstract Only. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Ribbat et al. “Complete suppression of filamentation and superior beam quality in quantum-dot lasers” Applied Physics Letters 82, 952 (2003) Abstract Only. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Kim et al. “Room-temperature 2.5 μm InGaAsSb/AlGaAsSb diode lasers emitting 1 W continuous waves” Applied Physics Letters: vol. 81 No. 17; Oct. 21, 2002. pp. 3146-3148. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Gmachi et al. “Dependence of the device performance on the number of stages in quantum-cascade lasers” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics: vol. 5, Issue 3, May/Jun. 1999. Abstract Only. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Walpole, J.M. “Semiconductor amplifiers and lasers with tapered gain regions” Optical and Quantum Electronics Jun. 1996, vol. 28, Issue 6, pp. 623-645. Abstract Only. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
C. Gmachl et al., “Improved CW operation of quantum cascade lasers with epitaxial-side heat-sinking,” In IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 11, No. 11, pp. 1369-1371, Nov. 1999. Abstract Only. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Al-Muhanna et al. “High-power (> 10 W) continuous-wave operation from 100-μm-aperture 0.97-μm-emitting Al-free diode lasers” Applied Physics Letters: vol. 73, No. 9; Aug. 31, 1998. pp. 1182-1184. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Knauer et al. “High-power 808 nm lasers with a super-large optical cavity” Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 20, No. 6; Apr. 27, 2005. Abstract Only **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Dan Botez “cw high-power single-mode operation of constricted double-heterojunction AlGaAs lasers with a large optical cavity” Applied Physics Letters: vol. 36, No. 3; Feb. 1, 1980. pp. 190-192. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Kintzer et al. “High-power, strained-layer amplifiers and lasers with tapered gain region” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters: vol. 5, No. 6, Jun. 1993. Abstract Only. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Slipchenko et al. “Ultralow internal optical loss in separate-confinement quantum-well laser heterostructures” Semiconductors: vol. 38, No. 12, Dec. 2004. Abstract Only. **See U.S. Appl. No. 15/677,572, filed Aug. 15, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190260181 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62375044 | Aug 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15677572 | Aug 2017 | US |
Child | 16401515 | US |