This application is a national stage of International Application No. PCT/IB2017/055911, filed Sep. 27, 2017, which claims the benefit of priority to Italian Application No. 102016000096594, filed Sep. 27, 2016, in the Italian Patent and Trademark Office, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein in their entireties by reference.
The present invention relates to a method for managing a telecommunication network according to the model of finite state machine.
Telecommunication networks are evolving towards ever-increasing programmability, making configuration of network devices more flexible and configurable remotely based on parameters that can be upgraded as needed (for example, transmission parameters such as “bit rate”). Network management and control must therefore adjust to this increase in programmability.
To allow a high system programmability, it is necessary to instruct all network elements about the actions they must take in response to predetermined events. For example, a minor failure, such as the degradation of the BER (Bit Error Rate), may imply a reconfiguration action, such as an increased redundancy in transmission.
However, currently, the device is being instructed at the time of its installation and this instruction can not be remotely modified afterwards. This greatly reduces the flexibility of the device itself within the network.
A solution to this problem is proposed in “Active stateful PCE with hitless LDPC code adaptation [Invited]” of F. Cugini et al. On the Journal of Optical Communications and Networking the February 2015. This paper proposes a solution where each network device has a local controller that detects a signal degradation and communicates it to the central controller, which decides how to react to degradation. For example, it decides to increase the encoding bits. The central controller then communicates to the local controllers (for example, the transmitter and the receiver) the changing of transmitting parameters. Local controllers will be responsible for changing the transmission parameters.
However, since the central controller needs to compute the solution of failure of each connected local device, in the event of many failures at the same time, there may be strong slowdowns, even in the order of a few seconds, leading to the slowdown in the recovery of data traffic.
Another example is the document WO2014037131, which describes a method for communication of optical signals that uses a plurality of optical paths, for such as “1+1 protection”. Even this document, however, provides that is the central controller to intervene in case of degradation of the quality of the signal transmission, carrying out an action of recovery that improves this quality. Furthermore, this recovery action is made by diverting the signal the transmission over a different path, thus reducing the overall free resources of the system.
It is therefore a feature of the present invention to provide a method for managing a telecommunication network that allows the remote reprogramming of network devices to adapt them to the current network condition.
It is also a feature of the present invention to provide such a method that ensures a good speed of resolution of the problem, and that does not incur any slowdowns if there is an excessive accumulation of failures at the same time.
These and other advantages are achieved by a method for managing a telecommunication network, said network comprising:
This method allows the program of diagnosis and solution of the failures to be always updated on the current condition of availability of the resources of the network. Furthermore, it solves the problem of the slowdowns due to the accumulation of problems to be computed by the central controller, since each nodal device carries out locally its own diagnosis and communicates the change of the status only when the failure is repaired.
In particular, the condition of availability of the resources of the network is defined on the basis of the number of active connections and of the spectral resources occupied by such connections.
In particular, the service class defines the priority of each data traffic of each device. The sequence of instructions that is updated by the central controller is selected both on the basis of the condition of availability of the network resources, both on the basis of the particular service class of the data traffic of the nodal device to which the sequence of instructions is sent.
Advantageously, the data traffic is made through optical technology.
In particular, the step of checking the condition of service of the data traffic can be made by a local controller of a nodal device acting as receiver.
In this case, the step of checking the condition of service is carried out by checking at least one of the following parameters:
Alternatively, the step of checking the condition of service of the data traffic is made by the local controller of a nodal device acting as sender.
In this case, the step of checking the condition of service is carried out by checking at least one of the following parameters:
Advantageously, the sequence of instructions started by the nodal device provides to use the “YANG” language implemented to a model of finite state machine for analyzing the data traffic and for changing the status.
Further characteristic and/or advantages of the present invention are more bright with the following description of an exemplary embodiment thereof, exemplifying but not limitative, with reference to the attached drawings in which:
In a first step, the central controller is adapted to check an updated condition of the availability of the network resources. In a predetermined way, on the basis of the condition of the network resources, the central controller can choose the sequence of instructions more appropriate for resolving possible minor failures affecting each nodal device of the network [301]. In particular, the central controller selects a plurality of sequences of instructions associated with the condition of the current network, each of which is suitable for a different service class attributable to the data traffic expressed by each nodal device.
The central controller compares then the plurality of updated sequences of instructions, and updated to the current condition of the network, with a plurality of sequences of instructions previously adopted [302]. In case that at least one sequence of instructions is different, the central controller proceeds sending the updated sequences of instructions to each nodal device of the network on the basis of the service class of the data traffic, or the data traffics, of the nodal device [303]. This way, the nodal devices are constantly updated to the sequence of instructions that best suits the condition of the resources of current network and the service classes of its data traffic.
Each nodal device, by a respective local controller, proceeds periodically, at time ranges δ, to checking the condition of service of the data traffic of the single nodal device. To this condition of service it is also associated, in a predetermined way, an optimal working status of the device [304].
Such condition of service of the data traffic is then compared with a predetermined reference condition [305]. If this condition is different, for example due to a minor failure, the nodal device proceeds to start the updated sequence of instructions, in order to change the working status and, consequently, the condition of service of the device [306].
Finally, each nodal device delivers to the central controller data concerning the operations carried out and, in particular, the change of the working status of the device [307].
In order to exemplify the above described steps, consider a telecommunications network having the following specifications:
Then consider that each nodal device of the network is programmed as a finite state machine composed by the following working states:
In “Steady” state, the condition of service is considered optimal if the pre-FEC BER (i.e. the Bit Error Rate before the Forward Error Correction) is below a 9×10−4 threshold. If the pre-FEC BER determined by the local controller passes this threshold, it starts a sequence of instructions of correction for changing the working status. In particular, in the considered example the sequence of instructions consists in switching to a more robust code, i.e. a FEC of 20% instead of 7% and a change of symbol speed at 31 Gbaud. In this case it passes to the working status of “Fec-Baud-Adapt”.
If instead the service is located in the status “Fec-Baud-Adapt”, and the pre-FEC BER returns under the threshold of 9×10−4, a different sequence of instructions is executed to return to the “Steady” working status, and to a FEC of 7% and to a symbol speed of 28 Gbaud.
The foregoing description some exemplary specific embodiments will so fully reveal the invention according to the conceptual point of view, so that others, by applying current knowledge, will be able to modify and/or adapt in various applications the specific exemplary embodiments without further research and without parting from the invention, and, accordingly, it is meant that such adaptations and modifications will have to be considered as equivalent to the specific embodiments. The means and the materials to realize the different functions described herein could have a different nature without, for this reason, departing from the field of the invention. It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology that is employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102016000096594 | Sep 2016 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2017/055911 | 9/27/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/060887 | 4/5/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7180856 | Breslau | Feb 2007 | B1 |
8732296 | Thomas | May 2014 | B1 |
8755685 | Zheng | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9137033 | Ogielski | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9179204 | Mitsui | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9369200 | Schmidtke | Jun 2016 | B1 |
20030235187 | Iwama | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040068516 | Lee | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20120170486 | Mohapatra | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130236169 | Gaudette | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140098710 | Ong | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140126899 | Prakash | May 2014 | A1 |
20150195126 | Vasseur | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150215200 | Bottari | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150249593 | Alvarez | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150358235 | Zhang | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160037239 | Chhillar | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160094398 | Choudhury | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160182146 | Schmidtke | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170085316 | Al Sayeed | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170201452 | Shivhare | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170223436 | Moynihan | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170257439 | Wang | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170317953 | Sareen | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20190273679 | Zhao | Sep 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2014037131 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO-2014037131 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Castoldi et al: “A Monitoring Architecture for Self-Configurable Optical Networks”, ICTON 2015, Jul. 5-9, 2015, paper We.C1.1, p. 1-4 (Year: 2015). |
International Search Report dated Dec. 13, 2017, issued to International Application No. PCT/IB2017/055911. |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Dec. 13, 2017, issued to International Application No. PCT/IB2017/055911. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190253175 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |