The technology described herein relates generally to aircraft systems, and more specifically to aircraft systems using dual fuels in an aviation gas turbine engine and a method of operating same.
Certain cryogenic fuels such as liquefied natural gas (LNG) may be cheaper than conventional jet fuels. Current approaches to cooling in conventional gas turbine applications use compressed air or conventional liquid fuel. Use of compressor air for cooling may lower efficiency of the engine system.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to have aircraft systems using dual fuels in an aviation gas turbine engine. It would be desirable to have aircraft systems that can be propelled by aviation gas turbine engines that can be operated using conventional jet fuel and/or cheaper cryogenic fuels such as liquefied natural gas (LNG). It would be desirable to have more efficient cooling in aviation gas turbine components and systems. It would be desirable to have improved efficiency and lower Specific Fuel Consumption in the engine to lower the operating costs. It is desirable to have aviation gas turbine engines using dual fuels that may reduce environmental impact with lower greenhouse gases (CO2), oxides of nitrogen—NOx, carbon monoxide—CO, unburned hydrocarbons and smoke.
In one aspect, an embodiment of the invention relates to a method for managing boil-off from an LNG tank located on board of an aircraft, including removing the boil-off from the aircraft and disposing of the removed boil-off from the aircraft.
In another aspect, an embodiment of the invention relates to a liquefied natural gas (LNG) boil-off management equipment assembly for use with an aircraft having an on-board LNG tank with a vent system having an outlet coupling, including a removal system having a fluid coupling selectively operably coupled to the outlet coupling of the vent system when the aircraft is on the ground and configured to remove boil-off from the aircraft and a disposal system configured to dispose of the boil-off by at least one of storing, oxidizing, consuming, or flaring the boil-off.
The technology described herein may be best understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures in which:
Referring to the drawings herein, identical reference numerals denote the same elements throughout the various views.
The exemplary aircraft system 5 has a fuel storage system 10 for storing one or more types of fuels that are used in the propulsion system 100. The exemplary aircraft system 5 shown in
As further described later herein, the propulsion system 100 shown in
The exemplary aircraft system 5 shown in
The exemplary embodiment of the aircraft system 5 shown in
The propulsion system 100 comprises a gas turbine engine 101 that generates the propulsive thrust by burning a fuel in a combustor.
During operation, air flows axially through fan 103, in a direction that is substantially parallel to a central line axis 15 extending through engine 101, and compressed air is supplied to high pressure compressor 105. The highly compressed air is delivered to combustor 90. Hot gases (not shown in
During operation of the aircraft system 5 (See exemplary flight profile shown in
An aircraft and engine system, described herein, is capable of operation using two fuels, one of which may be a cryogenic fuel such as for example, LNG (liquefied natural gas), the other a conventional kerosene based jet fuel such as Jet-A, JP-8, JP-5 or similar grades available worldwide.
The Jet-A fuel system is similar to conventional aircraft fuel systems, with the exception of the fuel nozzles, which are capable of firing Jet-A and cryogenic/LNG to the combustor in proportions from 0-100%. In the embodiment shown in
The fuel tank may be operated at or near atmospheric pressure, but can operate in the range of 0 to 100 psig. Alternative embodiments of the fuel system may include high tank pressures and temperatures. The cryogenic (LNG) fuel lines running from the tank and boost pump to the engine pylons may have the following features: (i) single or double wall construction; (ii) vacuum insulation or low thermal conductivity material insulation; and (iii) an optional cryo-cooler to re-circulate LNG flow to the tank without adding heat to the LNG tank. The cryogenic (LNG) fuel tank can be located in the aircraft where a conventional Jet-A auxiliary fuel tank is located on existing systems, for example, in the forward or aft cargo hold. Alternatively, a cryogenic (LNG) fuel tank can be located in the center wing tank location. An auxiliary fuel tank utilizing cryogenic (LNG) fuel may be designed so that it can be removed if cryogenic (LNG) fuel will not be used for an extended period of time.
A high pressure pump may be located in the pylon or on board the engine to raise the pressure of the cryogenic (LNG) fuel to levels sufficient to inject fuel into the gas turbine combustor. The pump may or may not raise the pressure of the LNG/cryogenic liquid above the critical pressure (Pc) of cryogenic (LNG) fuel. A heat exchanger, referred to herein as a “vaporizer,” which may be mounted on or near the engine, adds thermal energy to the liquefied natural gas fuel, raising the temperature and volumetrically expanding the cryogenic (LNG) fuel. Heat (thermal energy) from the vaporizer can come from many sources. These include, but are not limited to: (i) the gas turbine exhaust; (ii) compressor intercooling; (iii) high pressure and/or low pressure turbine clearance control air; (iv) LPT pipe cooling parasitic air; (v) cooled cooling air from the HP turbine; (vi) lubricating oil; or (vii) on board avionics or electronics. The heat exchanger can be of various designs, including shell and tube, double pipe, fin plate, etc., and can flow in a co-current, counter current, or cross current manner. Heat exchange can occur in direct or indirect contact with the heat sources listed above.
A control valve is located downstream of the vaporizer/heat exchange unit described above. The purpose of the control valve is to meter the flow to a specified level into the fuel manifold across the range of operational conditions associated with the gas turbine engine operation. A secondary purpose of the control valve is to act as a back pressure regulator, setting the pressure of the system above the critical pressure of cryogenic (LNG) fuel.
A fuel manifold is located downstream of the control valve, which serves to uniformly distribute gaseous fuel to the gas turbine fuel nozzles. In some embodiments, the manifold can optionally act as a heat exchanger, transferring thermal energy from the core cowl compartment or other thermal surroundings to the cryogenic/LNG/natural gas fuel. A purge manifold system can optionally be employed with the fuel manifold to purge the fuel manifold with compressor air (CDP) when the gaseous fuel system is not in operation. This will prevent hot gas ingestion into the gaseous fuel nozzles due to circumferential pressure variations. Optionally, check valves in or near the fuel nozzles can prevent hot gas ingestion.
An exemplary embodiment of the system described herein may operate as follows: Cryogenic (LNG) fuel is located in the tank at about 15 psia and about −265° F. It is pumped to approximately 30 psi by the boost pump located on the aircraft. Liquid cryogenic (LNG) fuel flows across the wing via insulated double walled piping to the aircraft pylon where it is stepped up to about 100 to 1,500 psia and can be above or below the critical pressure of natural gas/methane. The cryogenic (LNG) fuel is then routed to the vaporizer where it volumetrically expands to a gas. The vaporizer may be sized to keep the Mach number and corresponding pressure losses low. Gaseous natural gas is then metered though a control valve and into the fuel manifold and fuel nozzles where it is combusted in an otherwise standard aviation gas turbine engine system, providing thrust to the airplane. As cycle conditions change, the pressure in the boost pump (about 30 psi for example) and the pressure in the HP pump (about 1,000 psi for example) are maintained at an approximately constant level. Flow is controlled by the metering valve. The variation in flow in combination with the appropriately sized fuel nozzles result in acceptable and varying pressures in the manifold.
The exemplary aircraft system 5 has a fuel delivery system for delivering one or more types of fuels from the storage system 10 for use in the propulsion system 100. For a conventional liquid fuel such as, for example, a kerosene based jet fuel, a conventional fuel delivery system may be used. The exemplary fuel delivery system described herein, and shown schematically in
The exemplary fuel system 50 has a boost pump 52 such that it is in flow communication with the cryogenic fuel tank 122. During operation, when cryogenic fuel is needed in the dual fuel propulsion system 100, the boost pump 52 removes a portion of the cryogenic liquid fuel 112 from the cryogenic fuel tank 122 and increases its pressure to a second pressure “P2” and flows it into a wing supply conduit 54 located in a wing 7 of the aircraft system 5. The pressure P2 is chosen such that the liquid cryogenic fuel maintains its liquid state (L) during the flow in the supply conduit 54. The pressure P2 may be in the range of about 30 psia to about 40 psia. Based on analysis using known methods, for LNG, 30 psia is found to be adequate. The boost pump 52 may be located at a suitable location in the fuselage 6 of the aircraft system 5. Alternatively, the boost pump 52 may be located close to the cryogenic fuel tank 122. In other embodiments, the boost pump 52 may be located inside the cryogenic fuel tank 122. In order to substantially maintain a liquid state of the cryogenic fuel during delivery, at least a portion of the wing supply conduit 54 is insulated. In some exemplary embodiments, at least a portion of the conduit 54 has a double wall construction. The conduits 54 and the boost pump 52 may be made using known materials such as titanium, Inconel, aluminum or composite materials.
The exemplary fuel system 50 has a high-pressure pump 58 that is in flow communication with the wing supply conduit 54 and is capable of receiving the cryogenic liquid fuel 112 supplied by the boost pump 52. The high-pressure pump 58 increases the pressure of the liquid cryogenic fuel (such as, for example, LNG) to a third pressure “P3” sufficient to inject the fuel into the propulsion system 100. The pressure P3 may be in the range of about 100 psia to about 1000 psia. The high-pressure pump 58 may be located at a suitable location in the aircraft system 5 or the propulsion system 100. In a particular embodiment, the high-pressure pump 58 may be located in a pylon 55 of aircraft system 5 that supports the propulsion system 100.
As shown in
The cryogenic fuel delivery system 50 comprises a flow metering valve 65 (“FMV”, also referred to as a Control Valve) that is in flow communication with the vaporizer 60 and a manifold 70. The flow metering valve 65 is located downstream of the vaporizer/heat exchange unit described above. The purpose of the FMV (control valve) is to meter the fuel flow to a specified level into the fuel manifold 70 across the range of operational conditions associated with the gas turbine engine operation. A secondary purpose of the control valve is to act as a back pressure regulator, setting the pressure of the system above the critical pressure of the cryogenic fuel such as LNG. The flow metering valve 65 receives the gaseous fuel 13 supplied from the vaporizer and reduces its pressure to a fourth pressure “P4”. The manifold 70 is capable of receiving the gaseous fuel 13 and distributing it to a fuel nozzle 80 in the gas turbine engine 101. In an embodiment, the vaporizer 60 changes the cryogenic liquid fuel 112 into the gaseous fuel 13 at a substantially constant pressure.
The cryogenic fuel delivery system 50 further comprises a plurality of fuel nozzles 80 located in the gas turbine engine 101. The fuel nozzle 80 delivers the gaseous fuel 13 into the combustor 90 for combustion. The fuel manifold 70, located downstream of the control valve 65, serves to uniformly distribute gaseous fuel 13 to the gas turbine fuel nozzles 80. In some embodiments, the manifold 70 can optionally act as a heat exchanger, transferring thermal energy from the propulsion system core cowl compartment or other thermal surroundings to the LNG/natural gas fuel. In one embodiment, the fuel nozzle 80 is configured to selectively receive a conventional liquid fuel (such as the conventional kerosene based liquid fuel) or the gaseous fuel 13 generated by the vaporizer from the cryogenic liquid fuel such as LNG. In another embodiment, the fuel nozzle 80 is configured to selectively receive a liquid fuel and the gaseous fuel 13 and configured to supply the gaseous fuel 13 and a liquid fuel to the combustor 90 to facilitate co-combustion of the two types of fuels. In another embodiment, the gas turbine engine 101 comprises a plurality of fuel nozzles 80 wherein some of the fuel nozzles 80 are configured to receive a liquid fuel and some of the fuel nozzles 80 are configured to receive the gaseous fuel 13 and arranged suitably for combustion in the combustor 90.
In another embodiment of the present invention, fuel manifold 70 in the gas turbine engine 101 comprises an optional purge manifold system to purge the fuel manifold with compressor air, or other air, from the engine when the gaseous fuel system is not in operation. This will prevent hot gas ingestion into the gaseous fuel nozzles due to circumferential pressure variations in the combustor 90. Optionally, check valves in or near the fuel nozzles can be used prevent hot gas ingestion in the fuel nozzles or manifold.
In an exemplary dual fuel gas turbine propulsion system described herein that uses LNG as the cryogenic liquid fuel is described as follows: LNG is located in the tank 22, 122 at 15 psia and −265° F. It is pumped to approximately 30 psi by the boost pump 52 located on the aircraft. Liquid LNG flows across the wing 7 via insulated double walled piping 54 to the aircraft pylon 55 where it is stepped up to 100 to 1,500 psia and may be above or below the critical pressure of natural gas/methane. The Liquefied Natural Gas is then routed to the vaporizer 60 where it volumetrically expands to a gas. The vaporizer 60 is sized to keep the Mach number and corresponding pressure losses low. Gaseous natural gas is then metered though a control valve 65 and into the fuel manifold 70 and fuel nozzles 80 where it is combusted in an dual fuel aviation gas turbine system 100, 101, providing thrust to the aircraft system 5. As cycle conditions change, the pressure in the boost pump (30 psi) and the pressure in the HP pump 58 (1,000 psi) are maintained at an approximately constant level. Flow is controlled by the metering valve 65. The variation in flow in combination with the appropriately sized fuel nozzles result in acceptable and varying pressures in the manifold.
The dual fuel system consists of parallel fuel delivery systems for kerosene based fuel (Jet-A, JP-8, JP-5, etc) and a cryogenic fuel (LNG for example). The kerosene fuel delivery is substantially unchanged from the current design, with the exception of the combustor fuel nozzles, which are designed to co-fire kerosene and natural gas in any proportion. As shown in
III. A Fuel Storage System
The exemplary aircraft system 5 shown in
The exemplary cryogenic fuel storage system 10 shown in
The fuel storage system 10 may further comprise a safety release system 45 adapted to vent any high pressure gases that may be formed in the cryogenic fuel tank 22. In one exemplary embodiment, shown schematically in
The cryogenic fuel tank 22 may have a single wall construction or a multiple wall construction. For example, the cryogenic fuel tank 22 may further comprise (See
The cryogenic fuel storage system 10 shown in
The exemplary operation of the fuel storage system, its components including the fuel tank, and exemplary sub systems and components is described as follows.
Natural gas exists in liquid form (LNG) at temperatures of approximately about −260° F. and atmospheric pressure. To maintain these temperatures and pressures on board a passenger, cargo, military, or general aviation aircraft, the features identified below, in selected combinations, allow for safe, efficient, and cost effective storage of LNG. Referring to
(A) A fuel tank 21, 22 constructed of alloys such as, but not limited to, aluminum AL 5456 and higher strength aluminum AL 5086 or other suitable alloys.
(B) A fuel tank 21, 22 constructed of light weight composite material.
(C) The above tanks 21, 22 with a double wall vacuum feature for improved insulation and greatly reduced heat flow to the LNG fluid. The double walled tank also acts as a safety containment device in the rare case where the primary tank is ruptured.
(D) An alternative embodiment of either the above utilizing lightweight insulation 27, such as, for example, Aerogel, to minimize heat flow from the surroundings to the LNG tank and its contents. Aerogel insulation can be used in addition to, or in place of a double walled tank design.
(E) An optional vacuum pump 28 designed for active evacuation of the space between the double walled tank. The pump can operate off of LNG boil off fuel, LNG, Jet-A, electric power or any other power source available to the aircraft.
(F) An LNG tank with a cryogenic pump 31 submerged inside the primary tank for reduced heat transfer to the LNG fluid.
(G) An LNG tank with one or more drain lines 36 capable of removing LNG from the tank under normal or emergency conditions. The LNG drain line 36 is connected to a suitable cryogenic pump to increase the rate of removal beyond the drainage rate due to the LNG gravitational head.
(H) An LNG tank with one or more vent lines 41 for removal of gaseous natural gas, formed by the absorption of heat from the external environment. This vent line 41 system maintains the tank at a desired pressure by the use of a 1 way relief valve or back pressure valve 39.
(I) An LNG tank with a parallel safety relief system 45 to the main vent line, should an overpressure situation occur. A burst disk is an alternative feature or a parallel feature 46. The relief vent would direct gaseous fuel overboard.
(J) An LNG fuel tank, with some or all of the design features above, whose geometry is designed to conform to the existing envelope associated with a standard Jet-A auxiliary fuel tank such as those designed and available on commercially available aircrafts.
(K) An LNG fuel tank, with some or all of the design features above, whose geometry is designed to conform to and fit within the lower cargo hold(s) of conventional passenger and cargo aircraft such as those found on commercially available aircrafts.
(L) Modifications to the center wing tank 22 of an existing or new aircraft to properly insulate the LNG, tank, and structural elements.
Venting and boil off systems are designed using known methods. Boil off of LNG is an evaporation process which absorbs energy and cools the tank and its contents. Boil off LNG can be utilized and/or consumed by a variety of different processes, in some cases providing useful work to the aircraft system, in other cases, simply combusting the fuel for a more environmentally acceptable design. For example, vent gas from the LNG tank consists primarily of methane and is used for any or all combinations of the following:
(A) Routing to the Aircraft APU (Auxiliary Power Unit) 180. As shown in
(B) Routing to one or more aircraft gas turbine engine(s) 101. As shown in
(C) Flared. As shown in
(D) Vented. As shown in
(E) Ground operation. As shown in
IV. Propulsion (Engine) System
The vaporizer 60, shown schematically in
Heat exchange in the vaporizer 60 can occur in direct manner between the cryogenic fuel and the heating fluid, through a metallic wall.
(V) Method of Operating Dual Fuel Aircraft System
An exemplary method of operation of the aircraft system 5 using a dual fuel propulsion system 100 is described as follows with respect to an exemplary flight mission profile shown schematically in
An exemplary method of operating a dual fuel propulsion system 100 using a dual fuel gas turbine engine 101 comprises the following steps of: starting the aircraft engine 101 (see A-B in
In the exemplary method of operating the dual fuel aircraft gas turbine engine 101, the step of vaporizing the second fuel 12 may be performed using heat from a hot gas extracted from a heat source in the engine 101. As described previously, in one embodiment of the method, the hot gas may be compressed air from a compressor 155 in the engine (for example, as shown in
The exemplary method of operating a dual fuel aircraft engine 101, may, optionally, comprise the steps of using a selected proportion of the first fuel 11 and a second fuel 12 during selected portions of a flight profile 120, such as shown, for example, in
The exemplary method of operating a dual fuel aircraft engine 101 described above may further comprise the step of controlling the amounts of the first fuel 11 and the second fuel 12 introduced into the combustor 90 using a control system 130. An exemplary control system 130 is shown schematically in
The control system 130, 357 architecture and strategy is suitably designed to accomplish economic operation of the aircraft system 5. Control system feedback to the boost pump 52 and high pressure pump(s) 58 can be accomplished via the Engine FADEC 357 or by distributed computing with a separate control system that may, optionally, communicate with the Engine FADEC and with the aircraft system 5 control system through various available data busses.
The control system, such as for example, shown in
In an exemplary control system 130, 357, the control system software may include any or all of the following logic: (A) A control system strategy that maximizes the use of the cryogenic fuel such as, for example, LNG, on takeoff and/or other points in the envelope at high compressor discharge temperatures (T3) and/or turbine inlet temperatures (T41); (B) A control system strategy that maximizes the use of cryogenic fuel such as, for example, LNG, on a mission to minimize fuel costs; (C) A control system 130, 357 that re-lights on the first fuel, such as, for example, Jet-A, only for altitude relights; (D) A control system 130, 357 that performs ground starts on conventional Jet-A only as a default setting; (E) A control system 130, 357 that defaults to Jet-A only during any non typical maneuver; (F) A control system 130, 357 that allows for manual (pilot commanded) selection of conventional fuel (like Jet-A) or cryogenic fuel such as, for example, LNG, in any proportion; (G) A control system 130, 357 that utilizes 100% conventional fuel (like Jet-A) for all fast accels and decels.
Aircraft that operate with Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) or other cryogenic fuels must address issues of boil off Specifically, as heat flows from the environment into the fuel storage tank(s) LNG will increase in temperature and eventually boil. This boiling process raises the internal pressure of the tank, which in turn must be actively cooled or allowed to vent in order to maintain a tank pressure at or below the maximum allowable working pressure of the vessel.
The following embodiments of the invention address the boil off when the aircraft system 5 is on the ground. More specifically, as illustrated schematically in
The equipment assembly 500 may include equipment that may be portable or fixed. It will be understood that a variety of equipment may be used in the equipment assembly 500 and that the equipment may provide a variety of methods for safely disposing of the boil-off natural gas vapors. The equipment of the equipment assembly 500 may include a combustor for flaring the boil-off gas, a catalytic converter configured to oxidize the boil-off gas, a condenser, a compressor, etc.
It will also be understood that disposal of the boil-off by the equipment assembly 500 may include utilizing the boil-off gas. For example, the assembly may utilize the boil-off to generate power. By way of non-limiting example, the equipment of the equipment assembly 500 may include a reciprocating engine, gas turbine engine, Stirling engine, fuel cell, etc. that may be used to utilize the boil-off. Alternatively, the equipment of the equipment assembly 500 may be configured to collect the condensed boil-off. At least a portion of the equipment may be fluidly coupled, such as through a secondary coupler, to the LNG tank on the aircraft or a separate off-board storage tank. The equipment of the equipment assembly 500 may be configured to route the condensed boil-off to the LNG tank on the aircraft or the separate off-board storage tank. Further still, the equipment of the assembly may be configured to compress the boil-off gas and the equipment may be configured to re-inject the compressed boil-off into an existing natural gas grid.
The exemplary equipment assembly 500 above may be used in a method for managing boil-off from an LNG tank located on board of an aircraft. Such a method may include removing the boil-off from the aircraft and disposing of the removed boil-off from the aircraft. Disposing of the removed boil-off may include oxidizing the removed boil-off, flaring the removed boil-off, consuming the removed boil-off, storing the removed boil off, etc. By way of non-limiting example, consuming the removed boil-off may include utilizing the boil-off to generate power. By way of non-limiting example, storing the removed boil-off may include condensing the boil-off and collecting the condensed boil-off. Further, the condensed boil-off may be provided to the LNG tank on board the aircraft or to a separate off-board storage tank. By way of further non-limiting example, storing the removed boil-off may include compressing the boil-off gas and re-injecting the compressed boil-off into an existing natural gas grid.
In several variants of this equipment assembly 500, useful work is extracted from the boil off vapors, which would otherwise be directly vented to atmosphere or oxidized or flared. This technology also has reduces aircraft on-board weight. This support equipment assembly 500 may also increase the safety and environmental benefits of utilizing LNG as an aviation fuel, which minimizes costs.
The above described embodiments may safely dispose of and/or utilize boil off natural gas vapors from a cryogenic fuel tank on board the aircraft. Any variety of mechanisms may be used to dispose of the natural gas vapors and the above described embodiments provide for the simplest, safest, and most cost effective options. The assembly may be made portable by mounting to a truck or other moveable device. Further, the assembly may be configured to process the boil off vapors in any variety of ways including that the assembly may compress, combust, re-liquefy, etc. the boil-off using known devices appropriate to the desired outcome. By processing the boil off gas useful work may be achieved. The embodiments described above are ground based, thereby eliminating weight and volume concerns on board the aircraft. It is contemplated that the above described embodiments may be used in conjunction with an on-board mitigation system for added safety, redundancy, and/or reduced weight.
To the extent not already described, the different features and structures of the various embodiments may be used in combination with each other as desired. That one feature may not be illustrated in all of the embodiments is not meant to be construed that it may not be, but is done for brevity of description. Thus, the various features of the different embodiments may be mixed and matched as desired to form new embodiments, whether or not the new embodiments are expressly described. All combinations or permutations of features described herein are covered by this disclosure.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/747,007, filed on Dec. 28, 2012, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/071774 | 11/26/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/105326 | 7/3/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5548961 | Luger | Aug 1996 | A |
5678411 | Matsumura | Oct 1997 | A |
6047747 | Bowen | Apr 2000 | A |
7849691 | Faulkner et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8430237 | Westenberger et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
9316215 | Mackey | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20040107706 | Wilfried-Henning | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050224514 | Westenberger | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070199941 | Wilfried-Henning | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080209917 | Alder | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080289700 | Masingale | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294304 | Coulmeau | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080308175 | Lee | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090193780 | Faka | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090266086 | Lee | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100212329 | Bridgwood | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110185748 | Fuchs | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20130104570 | Stautner | May 2013 | A1 |
20130199199 | Moddemann | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140020408 | Berchowitz | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101558007 | Oct 2009 | CN |
101680598 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101743430 | Jun 2010 | CN |
102009028109 | Feb 2011 | DE |
2012045031 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012045035 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 5, 2014 which was issued in connection with PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US13/071774 which was filed on Nov. 26, 2013. |
Hao et al., “Process Comparison and Energy Saving Analysis of BOG Gas Treatment of LNG Receiving Terminal”, Chemical Engineering Design, vol. No. 16, Issue No. 1, pp. 13-16, Feb. 28, 2006. |
Li-Jun et al. “LNG Terminal BOG Recovery Process Improvement and Energy Saving Analysis”, Natural Gas Chemical Industry, vol. No. 37, Issue No. 03, pp. 48-50; 57, Jun. 25, 2012. |
Unofficial English Translation of Chinese Office Action issued in connection with corresponding CN Application No. 201380068536.0 on Dec. 23, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150330575 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61747007 | Dec 2012 | US |