The present invention concerns a method for manufacturing a hearing device which is fitted to an individual. It further concerns a respective fitting method.
We understand throughout the present description and claims under the term “hearing device” a device which acts on acoustical perception of an individual. Thereby such “acting” may be improving perception of acoustical signals but may also be reduction of perception e.g. if the hearing device is a hearing protection device.
The hearing device may further be a hearing device, worn completely in the ear channel, a CIC, may be an in-the-ear hearing device or an outside-the-ear hearing device or even an implantable hearing device. It further may be a monaural or a binaural hearing device. Further such hearing device may be provided for therapeutical purposes as a hearing device to improve acoustical perception of a hearing-impaired individual or may be a hearing help device for normal hearing persons so as to improve their acoustical perception e.g. selectively in specific acoustical surroundings as e.g. in noisy surrounding where, selectively, a speaker should be well perceived.
We understand under “fitting” of a hearing device to the needs of an individual, adapting characteristics of such hearing device to such needs. Such characteristics may e.g. be the type of hearing device (CIC, in-the-ear-, outside-the-ear device) the shape of such device, material of the outer shell and its characteristics, colour etc. “Fitting” further addresses the adjustment and selection of parameters which control the signal-transfer characteristic between an acoustical input and a mechanical output of the hearing device so as to fulfil individual's needs with respect to acoustical perception.
When a fitting operation is performed, commonly by an expert such as an audiologist, this is done primarily based on audiological needs of the individual, geometric characteristics of ear-channel and or of the ear, possibly taking some additional needs of the individual into consideration e.g. with respect to aesthetics.
The present invention departs from the recognition that a huge number of characteristics of an individual for whom a hearing device is to be manufactured do influence the characteristics of an optimally suited hearing device and thus, that a huge number of such characteristics should be taken into consideration for the fitting process. Nevertheless, today fitting machine support of an expert does hardly allow taking as many characteristics of an individual involved into account for the fitting process as would be desirable.
Attention is drawn e.g. to:
It is an object of the present invention to propose a manufacturing method for a hearing device for an individual by which a huge number of characteristics of such individual may be taken into account.
This is achieved by a method for manufacturing a hearing device fitted to an individual which comprises
In one embodiment registering of the characteristics of the involved individual comprises at least one of
Thereby we understand under “behaviour observation” getting an overall impression of the personality of the individual as may be done by an expert person. This may include performing standarized personality tests, orally or in written.
Still in a further embodiment the addressed characteristics comprise at least one of
We understand thereby under “audiologic characteristics” all characteristics which define for the perception of acoustical signals by the individual. Enclosed under this term are also specific characteristics of language, kind of speaking, voice etc. of the addressed individual.
We understand under “visual appearance characteristics” all characteristics of the individual which may be seen. Such characteristics may be geometry of ear-channel, ear, head and shoulders etc, appearance and movement behaviour of the individual etc.
We further understand under “psychological characteristics” characteristics which define the personality of the individual as e.g. whether such individual is sensible, introverted or extraverted etc.
As according to the present invention a personality profile of the individual involved is exploited and registered, in a further embodiment it is proposed to disable unauthorized persons to read data which contributes to the personality profile of the involved individual. This may, in one embodiment, be realized by encrypting such data.
In a further embodiment the registered characteristics are encoded to generate the data in dependency of which the personality profile is automatically evaluated.
Still in a further embodiment the data inputted to the fitting machine is grouped by this machine to form a personality vector of the individual. Such a personality vector has, as vector elements, data which are indicative for respective characteristics as have been registered in the registering step.
In a further embodiment there is stored a multitude of personality vectors, and there is performed a comparison between the personality vector of the individual involved and the personality vectors as stored.
Storing of the addressed personality vectors may be done in the fitting machine or may be done centrally in a central machine which is accessible from a multitude of fitting machines. Normally the addressed comparing will be performed at the specific fitting machine, especially if the fitting operation is performed interactively with the individual involved. Nevertheless and dependent on the overall data processing architecture, also the addressed comparing may be performed remote from the fitting machine.
In a further embodiment of the present invention by means of the addressed comparing at least one of the personality vectors as stored is determined which is most similar to the personality vector of the individual involved.
Still in a further embodiment, to each of the personality vectors as stored a fitting vector is assigned to. Manufacturing of the hearing device is based on the fitting vector which is assigned to the most similar personality vector as has been found by the addressed comparing.
We understand under a “fitting vector” a set of data elements, each of which defining a specific characteristic of a hearing device which may be adjusted or selected. Such elements may thus define for the type of the hearing device, its shape, material and characteristics of the shell, colour, parameters and their settings for the transfer function of the device etc.
Still in a further embodiment the fitting vector which is assigned to the most similar personality vector is adjusted to even more closely fit to the needs of the individual. Manufacturing is then based on the adjusted fitting vector.
Still in a further embodiment the fitting vectors as stored and assigned to the personality vectors are updated in dependency of at least one adjusted fitting vector.
In one embodiment such updating comprises adding a new fitting vector to the stored fitting vectors in dependency of at least one adjusted fitting vector and assigning such a new fitting vector to a new personality vector which latter is generated in dependency of at least one personality vector of an individual the characteristics of which is or has been registered.
As was already addressed, storing the personality vectors as well the fitting vectors mutually assigned may be done at a centralized machine which is in communication with multiple fitting machines at respective expert locations as by a private or public network. This makes it possible to exploit all the experience with respect to personality profiles to fitting vector assignment which is accumulated at different locations by different experts over time.
According to the present invention there is further proposed a method for fitting a hearing device to an individual which comprises
The invention shall now be further exemplified with the help of figures. The figures show:
An individual “I” for whom a hearing device shall be manufactured is subjected to a registering process 1 as schematically shown in
The characteristics of the individual “I” as registered during the registering process 1 are transmitted as schematically shown at 4 of
If, as an example, registering of characteristics of the individual “I” is performed by behavioural observation and/or an interview, the respective results may be registered in multiple-choice type. By means of encoding of the filled out, standardized answers by encoder 3 the respective characteristics—according to marked answers on the form—are encoded to data CI which respectively identify the characteristics of the individual “I” as evaluated during the interview.
If registration 1 is performed with a help of digital photographic equipment and as shown in
If for the registering process 1 video sequence recording is used, encoding may be performed as schematically shown in
As schematically shown in
The data CI which identifies the characteristics of the individual “I” as registered are entered to a storage unit 7 of the fitting machine. In their combination all these data CI form a personality vector K(CI) of the individual involved.
Because such data and personality vector is to be considered as data whereupon no person which is not authorized should have access to and as schematically shown in
The personality vector K(CI) of the individual involved is fed within the fitting machine 5 from the storage unit 7 to a comparing unit 15.
Within the fitting machine 5 there is further provided a table storage unit 13. In this table storage unit 13 a multitude of personality vectors K1(C) to Kn(C) is stored. The personality vectors K1(C) to Kn(C) represent different combinations of characteristics as may be registered by a registering 1 of different individuals “I”. When initializing the system and as shown in
In comparing unit 15 the personality vector K(CI) of the individual momentarily involved is compared with all personality vectors K1(C) to Kn(C) in table storage unit 13. The comparing unit thereby identifies, out of the personality vectors K1(C) to Kn(C), which one or which ones is or are most similar to the personality vector K(CI) of the individual “I” involved. Similarity evaluation may e.g. be made on the basis of comparing elements C with respective elements CI thereby forming element differences ΔC. There, still as an example, a personality difference vector ΔK(ΔC) results. Similarity of one or more than one of the personality vectors as stored in storage unit 13 may be established by considering the values or norm of the respective difference vectors ΔK(ΔC). The smaller the values of respective difference vectors ΔK are, the more the respectively involved personality vectors as stored in storage unit 13 may be considered “similar” to the personality vector K(CI) of the individual involved. By respective weighting α of the element differences ΔC in the personality difference vectors ΔK(αΔC) characteristics as registered by registering 1 may be provided with higher or with lower importance.
Once the comparing unit 15 has established the one or the more than one most similar personality vectors of the personality vectors K1(C) . . . Kn(C) with respect to the personality vector K(CI) of the individual momentarily involved, the respective one or more than one most similar personality vectors KSIM is or are addressed in the table storage unit 13.
In table storage 13 to each of the personality vectors K1(C) to Kn(C) there is assigned a personality profile indication PP1 to PPn respectively. Thus by addressing the one or more than one most similar personality vectors out of K1(C) to Kn(C), the respective personality profile indications PPSIM is or are addressed and output from the table storage unit 13.
In a further table storage unit 17 within the fitting machine 5 to each personality profile indication PP1 to PPn there is assigned a fitting vector F1(Ω) to Fn(Ω). Each fitting vector thereby defines a set of characteristics—Ω—which are to be established, at least in a first approximation, at a hearing device for an individual having the personality profile identified by the respective personality profile indication PP. Such fitting parameters forming the elements of the fitting vectors preferably comprise parameter settings for a transfer characteristic with which acoustical input signals are transmitted in a hearing device to mechanical output signals thereof. In today's hearing devices this transfer characteristic is mostly controlled by at least one digital signal processing unit DSP, and is adjustable by a huge variety of parameters.
The fitting vectors F as stored in the table storage unit 17 do each define a selection of how such parameters should be adjusted at a hearing device to be fitted as closely as possible to an individual “I” having a respective personality profile as identified by the personality profile indication PP.
Thus to each of the personality profile indications PP1to PPn in table storage unit 17 a suited fitting vector F1(Ω) to Fn(Ω) is assigned. By addressing the table storage unit 17 with PPSIM indicative of the one or more than one personality profiles most similar to the personality profile of the individual involved, there is thus addressed the one or more than one fitting vectors FSIM(Ω) for a hearing device to be manufactured for an individual of the addressed personality profile.
As shown at the table storage 13 as well as at the table storage unit 17 with inputs W, at least for initializing the system as shown in
When more than one most suited fitting vector FSIM(Ω) is established at the output of table storage unit 17, an expert as e.g. an audiologist has the possibility to select which one of these vectors shall be applied for fitting a hearing device for the individual involved (not shown in
The fitting vector FSIM(Ω) as proposed by the fitting machine 5, possibly after selection by the expert as was just addressed, is, in one embodiment shown by signal path (a), directly applied to a control input of a hearing device HD, with respect to the individual “I” ex-situ or in-situ. Thereby, the transfer characteristic of the hearing device HD, is adjusted based on the fitting vector FSIM(Ω). In a further embodiment the proposed one or more than one fitting vectors FSIM(Ω) is or are displayed to an expert E, as to an audiologist, who performs at least a part of the adjustments of the parameters of the transfer function at the hearing device HD manually.
The proposed fitting vector FSIM(Ω) will only exceptionally be optimized for the respective individual involved. Primarily and especially just after the system as of
In another embodiment before a fitting vector as stored in table storage 17 is updated there is evaluated the most common optimum fitting vector for an addressed personality profile and only after such evaluation over a number of respective individuals “I” belonging to that addressed personality profile, the respective fitting vector in table storage 17 is accordingly updated.
In another approach whenever, departing from a proposed fitting vector FSIM(Ω), adjustments have to be performed to find more optimum settings at the hearing device HD, such adjusted fitting vector is entered as a new fitting vector FNEW into table storage unit 17. Thereby there is also added a new personality vector KNEW into storage table 13 by loading the personality vector K(CI) of the individual “I” momentarily involved into storage 13 and assigning to such newly entered personality vector KNEW a respectively new personality profile indication PPNEW which is used within table storage 17 to address the newly entered fitting vector FNEW for further hearing device fittings.
Thus and as has been shown, by the present invention there is proposed a method for manufacturing a hearing device which is fitted to an individual, thereby performing such fitting automatically in dependency of such individual's personality. Due to the fact that there is realized substantial machine-support, a wide variety of characteristics of an individual may be quantitatively taken into account for optimum fitting of a hearing device to such individual's personal needs.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CH2005/000773 | 12/23/2005 | WO | 00 | 9/24/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/058453 | 6/8/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7027606 | D'Agri | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7068793 | Shim | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7162323 | Brumback et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0695107 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0154456 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0197564 | Dec 2001 | WO |
03030586 | Apr 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090010463 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |