The present invention relates to a manufacturing process for a structure of a semiconductor on insulator (SeOI) having reduced electrical losses. It also relates to such a structure.
The invention focuses on the general context of manufacturing a structure of semiconductor on insulator type (SOI) by the SMARTCUT® process. This process is described in detail, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,374,564. A structure of this type generally comprises a support layer, typically made of silicon monocrystalline having high resistivity, an insulating oxide layer, and a thin layer of semiconductor material. This thin layer is designed to take up components, typically electronic components.
In particular, in applications in which use is made of radio-frequencies, for example in the field of radiophony, part of the emitted waves can be absorbed by the support substrate, despite the presence of the insulating layer, resulting in electrical losses. To combat this difficulty, it has been proposed to boost resistivity of the support substrate to over 500 Ω·cm, or even over a few thousand Ohms·cm, though this does not prove to be sufficient. It was then proposed to deposit on the upper face of the support substrate (that is, the one receiving the insulating layer and the thin layer), a layer of material whereof the density of charge-carrier traps is high. A polycrystalline silicon layer is adapted in particular to ensure this function. Its structure is formed by a multitude of crystalline grains having defective boundaries (grain joint) forming traps, which makes the ensemble particularly low-conductive. This reduces leakage currents and losses in resistivity at the level of the support substrate.
The technique to achieve the foregoing structure includes depositing a polycrystalline silicon layer on the support substrate, then applying the usual steps of the SMARTCUT® process. This type of method is described in particular in U.S. patent application No. 2007/0032042. When conducting tests on resulting structures which would exhibit high resistivity according to the teachings of that application, however, it was found that the technique in question did not reduce electrical losses satisfactorily. Thus, there remains a need for different solutions to this problem, and these are now provided by the present invention.
The present invention now provides a manufacturing process for a semiconductor on insulator type structure having reduced electrical losses, in which the polycrystalline silicon layer which is placed on the support substrate has the expected resistive character.
The process is applied to a substrate successively comprising a support substrate made of silicon, an oxide layer and a thin layer of semiconductor material, and having a polycrystalline silicon layer interleaved between the support substrate and the oxide layer. The process includes oxidizing a donor substrate made of semiconductor material to form an oxide layer on a surface thereof; implanting ions in the donor substrate to form an embrittlement zone therein; bonding the donor and support substrates together with the oxide layer being located therebetween at a bonding interface, the substrate support having a high resistivity that is greater than 500 Ω·cm, and a polycrystalline silicon layer on its upper face which is bonded the donor substrate; fracturing the donor substrate at the embrittlement zone to transfer to the support substrate a thin layer of semiconductor material from the donor substrata and form a SeOI structure; and conducting at least one thermal stabilisation of the SeOI structure, at a temperature not exceeding 950° C., and for a time of at least 10 minutes.
The invention also relates to the structures that are provided by the method. These structures have an average resistivity that is greater than 10,000 Ohms·cm.
Other characteristics and advantages of the present invention will emerge from the following description of certain preferred embodiments. This description will be given in reference to the attached diagrams, in which:
The present method is preferably applied to an SOI structure that successively comprises a support substrate made of silicon, an oxide layer and a thin layer of semiconductor material, a polycrystalline silicon layer being interleaved between the support substrate and the oxide layer. The process comprises the following steps:
a) oxidation of a donor substrate made of semiconductor material to form an oxide layer at the surface;
b) implantation of ions in the donor substrate to form an embrittlement zone therein;
c) adhesion of the donor substrate to the support substrate, the oxide layer being located at the adhesion interface, the support substrate having undergone thermal treatment capable of giving it high resistivity, that is, a resistivity greater than 500 Ω·cm, its upper face which receives the donor substrate being coated by the polycrystalline silicon layer;
d) fracture of the donor substrate according to the embrittlement zone to transfer to the support substrate a thin layer of semiconductor material;
e) conducting of at least one stabilisation process of the resulting structure.
This process is remarkable in that the treatment capable of conferring high resistivity to the support substrate is carried out prior to formation of the polycrystalline silicon layer, and in that step e) comprises at least one long thermal step, carried out at a temperature not exceeding 950° C., for at least 10 minutes.
The polycrystalline silicon is thus deposited after treatment capable of giving the support substrate high resistivity, such that high temperatures utilised during this treatment do not affect the polycrystalline character of the polycrystalline silicon layer.
Similarly, thermal budget used during thermal treatment of the final structure is not sufficient to modify this polycrystalline character.
According to other advantageous and non-limiting characteristics:
The invention also relates to a structure of semiconductor on insulator type, with reduced electrical losses, which successively comprises a support substrate made of silicon, an oxide layer and a thin layer of semiconductor material, a polycrystalline silicon layer being interleaved between the support substrate and the oxide layer and is remarkable in that the polycrystalline silicon layer has a resistivity greater than 5,000 Ohms·cm.
Preferably, it has an average resistivity greater than 10,000 Ohms·cm, or even greater than 50,000 Ohms·cm.
As pointed out earlier, the process according to the invention is of the SMARTCUT® type.
This oxide layer can result from thermal oxidation of the donor substrate 1 or has been formed by conventionally depositing by chemical depositing techniques in a vapor phase well known to the person skilled in the art under the abbreviations CVD and LPCVD (for “Chemical Vapor Deposition” and “Low Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition”).
With reference to
“Implantation of atomic or ionic species” is understood as any bombardment of these species capable of introducing them to the donor substrate with maximal concentration to a predetermined depth of the substrate relative to the bombarded surface, with a view to creating an embrittlement zone 13. This type of implantation is done according to the process known by the name SMARTCUT®.
The embrittlement zone 13 delimits a thin layer 11 from the rest 12 of the donor substrate 1.
The implantation of atomic or ionic species can be simple implantation, that is, implantation of a single atomic species such as for example implantation of hydrogen, helium or noble gas.
Implantation can also be co-implantation of atomic or ionic species, such as helium and hydrogen.
A receiver substrate 2 is illustrated in
A characteristic of this support substrate is having undergone thermal treatment capable of giving it an other resistivity, that is, a resistivity greater than 500 Ω·cm, or even greater than 1,000, preferably still greater than 2,000, or even still more preferably greater than 3,000 Ω·cm.
This treatment can have been carried out since fabrication of the substrate or later on, within the scope of the present process.
This thermal treatment capable of giving the support substrate 2 high resistivity is a thermal treatment for example, comprising at least one step brought to a temperature of between 500 and 1,200° C. for 30 minutes to 20 hours.
In another embodiment, this treatment comprises annealing treatment in three steps, the second step being brought to a temperature less than that of the other two steps.
Advantageously, these three steps are carried out respectively at a temperature of between 1,000 and 1,200° C. for 1 to 10 hours, 600 to 900° C. for 1 to 10 hours and 900 to 1,200° C. for 1 to 48 hours.
The function of the first step of this advantageous and optional treatment, also known as “high-low-high treatment”, is to remove oxygen from a superficial zone of the substrate, by a phenomenon known as “exodiffusion” to produce denuded zone, that is, a zone without oxygen precipitates. This is therefore a zone having fewer defects than at the outset, an advantage for subsequent depositing of polysilicon.
The aim of the second step of this process is to enable nucleation, that is, the creation of “embryos” of interstitial oxygen precipitates.
Finally, the function of the third step of this process is to enable growth of precipitates created in the preceding step, that is, constitute oxide clusters. This translates via an increase in resistivity of the material.
In any case, this augmentation treatment of the resistivity of the substrate 2 is carried out prior to depositing, on the latter, of a polycrystalline silicon layer 20.
Proceeding with this effectively retains the polycrystalline structure of the layer 20.
After the donor substrate 1 is reversed, it is then put in contact with the layer 20 of the support substrate 8, such that the oxide layer 10 regains contact with the polysilicon layer 20.
Adhesion between the two substrates is completed in a preferred but non-obligatory manner, by molecular adhesion.
Disbonding annealing is carried out, followed by detachment from the rest 12 of the donor substrate 1, at the level of the embrittlement zone 13, so as to transfer the layer 11 to the support substrate 2, more precisely on the polysilicon layer 20.
This produces a substrate 3 of semiconductor on insulator type which is in semi-finished state.
Stabilisation of the resulting structure 3 is then carried out.
In keeping with the invention, this stabilisation comprises a long thermal step, carried out at a temperature not exceeding 950° C. for at least 10 minutes, and optionally a brief treatment carried out for less than 10 minutes at a temperature greater than 1,000° C.
The long thermal step is preferably carried out for several hours, whereas the brief treatment is carried out for 1 to 2 minutes at a temperature of the order of 1,200° C.
More precisely, these finishing steps comprise at least one of the following treatments:
a) thermal stabilisation treatment before polishing, consuming the zone of the donor substrate damaged by separation at the level of the interface 13;
b) mechanical and chemical polishing treatment (CMP) for consuming the material of the layer 11 to arrive at the preferred thickness;
c) final thermal thinning treatment to attain the final preferred thickness.
In respecting the temperature and duration conditions indicated earlier, thermal budgets carried out are inadequate for recrystallized polysilicon, which loses its beneficial effects.
But, limiting the duration and/or temperature of the treatments during stabilisation of the structure causes embrittlement of the interface created such that it is highly useful to carry out intermediate treatments for reinforcing cohesion of the structure. A particular treatment is carried out prior to adhesion using plasma.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention, the polycrystalline silicon layer is formed on a layer 21 known as “network crystalline decoupling,” that is, a layer having a concentration gradient with a mesh parameter different to that of silicon formed by the support substrate.
This difference in mesh parameter is for example greater than 5%.
This decoupling layer advantageously contains polycrystalline silicon, but in no case pure monocrystalline silicon.
According to a preferred embodiment, it also contains a silicon-based and another atomic species-based semiconductor material.
This can be SiC or SiGe for example.
The advantage of this gradient layer between the support substrate 2 and the polysilicon layer is that it prevents the polysilicon from recrystallising from the layer 11.
This gradient layer opposes recrystallisation of polysilicon. Via its cavities and grain joints, the polysilicon layer:
The decoupling layer 21 as well as the polysilicon layer 20 are preferably manufactured in the same depositing step, continuously, meaning that the decoupling layer 21 is first formed by injecting a first gas to constitute polysilicon and a second gas to constitute the other atomic species; then, once the preferred thickness is attained the arrival of the second gas is cut off by continued injecting of the gas to form the polysilicon layer 20.
As shown in
Optionally, a stack comprising decoupling layer 21/polysilicon layer 20/decoupling layer 21/polysilicon layer 20, etc., can be formed.
Advantageously, the total thickness of the polysilicon layer and of the decoupling layer or decoupling layers is between 3,000 and 10,000 Å, with a ratio 10 between the thickness of the polysilicon layer and the decoupling layer.
This characterisation is done by means of the well-known method called “4PP” (for “four points probe”), specifically by using 4 electrodes passing through the entire structure.
A second method known as “SRP,” also well known, traces the evolution of resistivity as a function of the depth, by means of a mitre, as shown by the abovementioned
Irrespective of the method used, it is evident that the structure treated according to the process according to the invention retains high resistivity, compared to the same structure which would not have undergone the process according to the invention.
Using the method known as 4PP and by conducting comparative tests, average resistivity rises from 4 to 5,000 Ω·cm to over 70,000 Ω·cm.
Furthermore, and as shown in
This is due to the fact that the polysilicon has retained its polycrystalline structure.
Finally, tests were conducted by “injecting” an electrical signal in a component.
The power of harmonics as a function of the principal signal is then measured.
When components used in the field of radio-frequencies are operating, parasite signals can be generated by the electrical signals that pass through them at different frequencies. These are known as harmonic waves.
In the case of a glass substrate, almost no harmonic is generated, and the more the substrate on which the component electronic is made high-performing, the less is the power of the harmonics.
In the case of a support substrate 2 made of high-resistivity silicon, without the presence of a polycrystalline silicon layer under the Box, the harmonics are high.
With the presence of such a layer, though without modifying thermal treatments, electrical performance is improved, but thermal budget causes partial recrystallization or even total recrystallization of the poly-Si and eliminates significant electrical traps.
Finally, the presence of polycrystalline silicon under the Box considerably improves electrical performance, since the manufacturing process is applied according to the invention and/or a decoupling layer 21 is introduced which prevents recrystallization of the silicon.
It is evident, finally, that depositing a gradient layer between the support substrate and the polycrystalline silicon can also be carried out within the scope of manufacturing a structure of SOI type, other than by the SMARTCUT® technique.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09 58658 | Dec 2009 | FR | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/487,066 filed Jun. 1, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,658,514, issued Feb. 25, 2014, which is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/EP2010/068883 filed Dec. 3, 2010, which claims priority of French Application No. 0958658 filed Dec. 4, 2009, the entire content of each of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5374564 | Bruel | Dec 1994 | A |
5492859 | Sakaguchi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5561303 | Schrantz et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
6171932 | Shiota | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6472711 | Shiota | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7147711 | Tamatsuka et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7902045 | Arena et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7964423 | Akimoto | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20030040163 | Yokokawa et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030170990 | Sakaguchi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040002197 | Fathimulla et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040159908 | Fathimulla et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040259388 | Schwarzenbach et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050042361 | Tomey et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050127477 | Takase et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050158969 | Binns et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050250349 | Sadamitsu et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050253221 | Takase et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050269671 | Faure et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060024908 | Neyret et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060141748 | Daval et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060166451 | Raskin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070032040 | Lederer | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032042 | Takayama et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070066033 | Kurita et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070080372 | Faure et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080014717 | Endo et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080050887 | Chen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080303118 | Arena et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090042361 | Takeno et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090075456 | Akimoto et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100297828 | Maleville | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100314722 | Ishizuka et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 688 990 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1688990 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2004-6615 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2005-123351 | May 2005 | JP |
2007-507093 | Mar 2007 | JP |
WO 2005029576 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2009112306 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2010049496 | May 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, Appl. No. PCT/EP2010/068883, Mar. 1, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,066, filed Jun. 1, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,066, Restriction Requirement, Feb. 6, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,066, Non-Final Office Action, Apr. 4, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,066, Notice of Allowance, Jul. 26, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140038388 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13487066 | Jun 2012 | US |
Child | 14049263 | US | |
Parent | PCT/EP2010/068883 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 13487066 | US |