The present invention relates to wire stents and related vascular devices. More particularly, it refers to a stent or other vascular positioned device containing a wire coated with a biocompatible fluoropolymer.
My prior application includes stents made from interwoven groups of yarn filaments containing a wire. U.S. Pat. No. 6,161,399 issued Dec. 19, 2000 and entitled, “Process for Manufacturing a Wire Reinforced Monolayer Fabric Stent” is hereby incorporated by reference. In addition, U.S. Pat. No. 5,961,545 describes wire stents immobilized longitudinally between tubes of expandable polytetrafluoroethylene. U.S. Pat. No. 5,957,954 describes braiding a stent and a polytetrafluoroethylene textile strand sleeve together in an axial alignment. U.S. Pat. No. 6,015,432 describes an endovascular tube made from woven graft material with a wire employed in openings in the weave. U.S. Pat. No. 5,741,325 describes a self-expanding intraluminal prosthesis containing interwoven fibers including reinforcing wire. U.S. Pat. No. 5,607,478 describes how to make a prosthesis from an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) tube with a winding of PTFE.
It also is well known in the prior art to coat insulated wire with foamed fluoropolymer insulation as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,770,819. None of these prior art disclosures teach how to coat a wire used in a prosthesis with a porous expanded PTFE to create uniform expansion of the prosthesis.
I have now invented a process to improve my stent of U.S. Pat. No. 6,161,399 by coating the plurality of wire strands of the stent with a porous expanded PTFE. The addition of expanded PTFE to the wire strand reduces platelet adhesion to the stent product. Restenosis will not occur since tissue and cells will not adhere to the expanded PTFE.
The process of this invention is achieved by pretreating a spool of wire to achieve a predetermined shape to the wire and returning the treated wire to its spool. The wire is then fed into an ePTFE extrusion machine where the wire feed is regulated depending on the speed of the extrusion machine. The wire is fed first into a nozzle of the extruder, the nozzle having a concentric opening in which the ePTFE is heated, sintered and then extruded. A laser determines the thickness of the ePTFE layer to maintain uniformity on the wire. The ePTFE coated wire is then respooled and interlaced by braiding or knitting with other coated wire. Various angles are formed with the coated wire which determines the radial and axial compressibility of the resulting stent.
The invention can be best understood by those having ordinary skill in the art by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Throughout the following detailed description, the same reference numerals refer to the same element in all figures.
Referring to
Typical wire 10 for use in this invention is nickel-titanium alloy known as NITINOL™, stainless steel, titanium, tungsten, platinum, gold, silver or other like malleable metal that will retain a memory after heat treatment.
After heat treating NITINOL™ between 500–600 degrees C. for two to ten minutes, the NITINOL™ wire 10 is respooled 14 as shown in
The wire containing the fluoropolymer coating is then respooled 22 and used in the knitting or braiding machine 20 shown in
The stent 30 is formed by two dimensional braiding in which the coated wire strands are crossed on top of each other so that strands in the final stent product are tightly held together. Depending on the type of crossing pattern employed and number of coated wire strands fed into the braid, the resulting braid will vary in its properties, i.e., axial and radial strength and compressibility. In contrast, three dimensional braiding as used in some prior art stents constitute materials superimposed concentrically over each other. This latter type of stent has a substantially thicker wall than the present invention of a braided two dimensional stent.
Although the preferred stent of the present invention employs about twenty-four interlaced coated wires represented by wire strands 23, 25, 27 and 32 in
Stent 30 of the present invention is made using a braiding or knitting machine 20 schematically depicted in
As seen in
In the preferred method of knitting the stent 30, the spool 22 is caused to supply coated wire 32 at a slower supply rate than is the case for the coated wire strands 23, 25 and 27. For this purpose, the brake mechanism 39 is activated to a desired degree of braking force to slow down the supply of coated wire 32 to a ratio of, for example, 1:4 as compared to the speed of supply of the strands 23, 25 and 27 of coated wire.
As a result of this knitting technique, a stent 30 is woven having a coated wire strand 32 braided about the other wire strands, locking the wire together and thereby providing a stent with increased axial and radial strength and resistance to restenosis and platelet adhesion to the stent 30.
In the braiding of the coated wire strands, the wire strands are crossed on top of each other so that the coating is tightly held because of the crossing pattern to produce a stent with low porosity. The crossing pattern determines the appearance of the surface, radial strength of the stent graft and the compressibility in both the radial and axial direction. Compressibility in the longitudinal or axial direction provides a low profile for the stent as it is introduced into a body lumen.
The coated wire strands determine the wall thickness for a particular diameter of the stent. For example, in a 4 mm coated wire the feed ratio of strands to be braided are different from the feed ratios that are required for a 6 mm stent graft. The preferred number of wire strands insures a small enough stent so it can be moved through the smallest possible hole. Variations in the coated metal strand thickness or shape also alters the thickness of the stent wall diameter.
This invention produces a stent that may or may not have areas of blood leakage, but does provide for passage of ions necessary for proper lumen wall function. The surface coverage is necessary to control areas of higher leakage of blood. The stent should have a uniform micro porous wall which determines the success of an implant. Blood needs to sweat through the holes, but not leak through the walls.
Compliance of the stent is a factor directly related to the porosity. The more porous the stent graft, the more compliant it is. An optimal compliance is sought which is essential to impart the pulsable nature of the natural arterial wall into the prosthesis.
The coated wire strands can be introduced into the braid in separate spools or they can be mixed together in one spool and then introduced into the process. Alternatively, the coated wire strands could be braided into a two strand mixture and then fed by several spools to form a braid. A wire strand 25 can be coiled as seen in
The stent 30 also could have fabric incorporated between the coated wire braided structure. The wall thickness of the stent is such that in the compressed state, a double wall thickness is at least one-fifth an end diameter of the stent. For example, if the final end diameter of the stent is 6 mm, the compressed double wall thickness is less than 1.20 mm.
If fabric material is employed, such fabric material can be, for example, polyester, polypropylene, polyethylene, polyurethane, polytetrafluoroethylene or other natural fabric materials. Such strands of yarn can be monofilament or multi-filament. If monofilament strands are used, the strands can be twisted or wound prior to being fed into the knitting machine 20. The coated wire strands can have a diameter of approximately 0.004 inches and will have a greater thickness than that of the yarn.
As shown in
The ends of the coated wire can be terminated using a biocompatible glue (the coating is glued to the wire), ultrasonically welded, or the wire can be looped around and welded such that there is a small loop at the ends. This prevents the fraying of the wire and also prevents the coating from fraying. When the ends are looped around and welded, there are no sharp ends of the metal and this prevents any injury or trauma to the vessel wall.
The braided or knitted stent fabricated from coated wires as described above has radial and longitudinal compressibility. When the stent is elongated, it returns to an original relaxed state which is the final diameter of the stent. The stent is elongated and a sheath or a covering mechanism is loaded on top of the stent. This keeps the stent in a compressed state. The entire system is then introduced into a human body cardiovascular, vascular or non-vascular system and the sheath is slowly withdrawn either by pulling the sheath backwards or by moving the stent forwards. The stent slowly expands to its relaxed state and is implanted at a suitable site. If the stent is not implanted at the right area of the vascular system, it can be withdrawn again into the sheath, provided the complete stent has not been deployed yet. The sheath has also an inner core on which the coated stent is compressed and the sheath introduced on top of it. This inner core has four radiopaque markers on it which show the operator on an X-ray image the compressed length of the stent and also the relaxed length of the stent. Thus, the operator is able to clearly determine the length of the stent versus the diseased section of the vessel.
The above description has described specific structural details embodying the invention. However, it will be within one having skill in the art to make modifications without departing from the spirit and scope of the underlying inventive concept of this invention. The inventive concept is not limited to the structure and process described, but includes modifications and equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/672,422, filed Sep. 28, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,652,574. Benefit of the earlier filing date is claimed in accordance with 35 U.S.C. §120.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2524661 | Harder et al. | Oct 1950 | A |
3466166 | Levinstein et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3562024 | Smith | Feb 1971 | A |
3657744 | Ersek | Apr 1972 | A |
4023557 | Thorne et al. | May 1977 | A |
4281419 | Treace | Aug 1981 | A |
4300244 | Bokros | Nov 1981 | A |
4409172 | Ward, Jr. et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4441215 | Kaster | Apr 1984 | A |
4465481 | Blake | Aug 1984 | A |
4573242 | Lankton et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4600446 | Torisaka et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4640320 | Avison et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4655771 | Wallsten | Apr 1987 | A |
4669474 | Barrows | Jun 1987 | A |
4718907 | Karwoski et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4719916 | Ravo | Jan 1988 | A |
4732152 | Wallsten et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4752054 | Jonsson | Jun 1988 | A |
4762128 | Rosenbluth | Aug 1988 | A |
4776337 | Palmaz | Oct 1988 | A |
4813416 | Pollak et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4816339 | Tu et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4866816 | Caveney | Sep 1989 | A |
4877030 | Beck et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4878906 | Lindemann et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4879135 | Greco et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4902290 | Fleckenstein et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4950285 | Wilk | Aug 1990 | A |
4986831 | King et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4990158 | Kaplan et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5007926 | Derbyshire | Apr 1991 | A |
5059166 | Fischell et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059211 | Stack et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5061276 | Tu et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5064435 | Porter | Nov 1991 | A |
5078726 | Kreamer | Jan 1992 | A |
5078736 | Behl | Jan 1992 | A |
5084065 | Weldon et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5100429 | Sinofsky et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5104403 | Brotzu et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5107852 | Davidson et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5116360 | Pinchuk et al. | May 1992 | A |
5123917 | Lee | Jun 1992 | A |
5147385 | Beck et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5156620 | Pigott | Oct 1992 | A |
5156623 | Hakamatsuka et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5158548 | Lau et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163951 | Pinchuk et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5180366 | Woods | Jan 1993 | A |
5192307 | Wall | Mar 1993 | A |
5192310 | Herweck et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5192311 | King et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195984 | Schatz | Mar 1993 | A |
5197977 | Hoffman, Jr. et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5217026 | Stoy et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5234456 | Silvestrini | Aug 1993 | A |
5234457 | Andersen | Aug 1993 | A |
5258020 | Froix | Nov 1993 | A |
5279594 | Jackson | Jan 1994 | A |
5282823 | Schwartz et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5282824 | Gianturco | Feb 1994 | A |
5289831 | Bosley | Mar 1994 | A |
5290271 | Jernberg | Mar 1994 | A |
5304220 | Maginot | Apr 1994 | A |
5306286 | Stack et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5330500 | Song | Jul 1994 | A |
5366504 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5383926 | Lock et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5387235 | Chuter | Feb 1995 | A |
5389106 | Tower | Feb 1995 | A |
5456713 | Chuter | Oct 1995 | A |
5507771 | Gianturco | Apr 1996 | A |
5522881 | Lentz | Jun 1996 | A |
5556414 | Turi | Sep 1996 | A |
5607478 | Lentz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5628787 | Mayer | May 1997 | A |
5630840 | Mayer | May 1997 | A |
5632840 | Campbell | May 1997 | A |
5649977 | Campbell | Jul 1997 | A |
5674241 | Bley et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5674276 | Andersen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679470 | Mayer | Oct 1997 | A |
5700285 | Myers et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700286 | Tartaglia et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5718159 | Thompson | Feb 1998 | A |
5725570 | Heath | Mar 1998 | A |
5741325 | Chaikof et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5766204 | Porter et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770819 | Mehan | Jun 1998 | A |
5800511 | Mayer | Sep 1998 | A |
5824046 | Smith et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824077 | Mayer | Oct 1998 | A |
5836925 | Soltesz | Nov 1998 | A |
5836962 | Gianotti | Nov 1998 | A |
5843158 | Lenker et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843166 | Lentz et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849037 | Frid | Dec 1998 | A |
5855600 | Alt | Jan 1999 | A |
5858556 | Eckert et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5910168 | Myers et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913896 | Boyle et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5927345 | Samson | Jul 1999 | A |
5957954 | Badalamenti et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961545 | Lentz et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980531 | Goodin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980564 | Stinson | Nov 1999 | A |
6015432 | Rakos et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6027779 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6053943 | Edwin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6077296 | Shokoohi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090134 | Tu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6161399 | Jayaraman | Dec 2000 | A |
6162537 | Martin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165211 | Thompson | Dec 2000 | A |
6187039 | Hiles et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6214040 | Jayaraman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6342068 | Thompson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6357104 | Myers | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364903 | Tseng et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6364904 | Smith | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6475235 | Jayaraman | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6547814 | Edwin et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6592617 | Thompson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
20020065545 | Leonhardt et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020161392 | Dubrul | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9600103 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO 9740755 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9932051 | Jul 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040133272 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09672422 | Sep 2000 | US |
Child | 10720552 | US |