Method for manufacturing an electrode assembly configured for use with an electrosurigcal instrument

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9713491
  • Patent Number
    9,713,491
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 12, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 25, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
A method for manufacturing an electrode configuration configured for use with an electrosurgical instrument is provided. A pre-assembled jaw configuration including jaw members including respective first and second electrodes is provided. One or more stop members are positioned on the first electrode. The first and second electrodes are approximated toward one another for contact therebetween so as to form an at least one indentation on the second electrode.
Description
BACKGROUND

Technical Field


The present disclosure relates to a method for manufacturing an electrode assembly configured for use with an electrosurgical instrument. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a method for manufacturing an electrode assembly including a self-setting electrode configuration.


Description of Related Art


Electrosurgical instruments configured to electrosurgically treat tissue are well known in the art. Typically, the electrosurgical instrument includes a housing, shaft, and an end effector including a pair of jaw members. One or more suitable electrosurgical energy sources may be utilized to provide electrosurgical energy to the jaw members of the end effector. Depending on the electrical configuration of the jaw members, one or both of the jaw members will include an electrode configuration that is configured to supply current thereto for electrosurgically treating, e.g., coagulate, seal, fulgurate, desiccate, etc., tissue.


In certain instances, such as, for example, during a tissue sealing procedure, a precise, well maintained gap between opposing electrodes is required to ensure proper vessel sealing and grasping functions. This gap, which is commonly referred to in the art as “jaw gap,” is a function of the individual components as well as the final device assembly process. Variation in these areas may lead to overall variation in “jaw gap” that may result in degradation of performance.


SUMMARY

As can be appreciated, a method for manufacturing an electrode assembly including a self-setting electrode configuration may prove useful in the surgical arena.


Embodiments of the present disclosure are described in detail with reference to the drawing figures wherein like reference numerals identify similar or identical elements. As used herein, the term “distal” refers to the portion that is being described which is further from a user, while the term “proximal” refers to the portion that is being described which is closer to a user.


An aspect of the present disclosure provides a method for manufacturing an electrode configuration for an electrosurgical instrument. A jaw configuration including first and second jaw members including respective first and second electrodes thereon is provided. One or more stop members are positioned on the first electrode. The first and second jaw members including the electrodes are approximated toward one another for contact therebetween. And, one or more indentations are formed on the second electrode. The indentation(s) may be configured to provide a jaw gap that ranges from about 0.001 inches to about 0.006 inches. Moreover, during in-situ use of the pre-assembled jaw members, engagement between the at least one stop member and the at least one indentation is configured to prevent jaw splay.


Approximating the first and second jaw members including the electrodes may include compressing the first and second jaw members with a force that is at least twice as much as a force that is utilized to electrosurgically treat tissue in situ. Positioning the stop member(s) may include providing a stop member that is a ceramic dot.


A shim may be provided between the first and second opposing electrodes prior to approximating the first and second jaw members including the electrodes toward one another so as to control a depth of the at least one indentation. A portion of a bottom surface of the second electrode may be removed to facilitate forming the at least one indentation. The portion of the bottom surface may be located directly beneath the position of where the at least one indentation is to be formed. An etching process may be utilized to remove the portion of a bottom surface of the second electrode. Alternatively, a portion of a bottom surface of the second electrode may be chemically treated to facilitate forming the at least one indentation; the portion of the bottom surface is located directly beneath chemically.


An aspect of the present disclosure provides a method for manufacturing an electrode configuration for an electrosurgical instrument. A pre-assembled jaw configuration including first and second jaw members including respective first and second electrodes is provided. One or more stop members are positioned on the first electrode. A portion of a bottom surface of the second electrode is configured to deform when a predetermined force is applied thereto. The first and second jaw members including the electrodes are approximated toward one another for contact therebetween. And, one or more indentations are formed on the second electrode. The indentation(s) may be configured to provide a jaw gap that ranges from about 0.001 inches to about 0.006 inches. Moreover, during in-situ use of the pre-assembled jaw members, engagement between the at least one stop member and the at least one indentation is configured to prevent jaw splay.


Approximating the first and second jaw members including the electrodes may include compressing the first and second jaw members with a force that is at least twice as much as a force that is utilized to electrosurgically treat tissue in situ. Positioning the stop member(s) may include providing a stop member that is a ceramic dot.


A shim may be provided between the first and second opposing electrodes prior to approximating the first and second jaw members including the electrodes toward one another so as to control a depth of the at least one indentation. A portion of a bottom surface of the second electrode may be removed to facilitate forming the at least one indentation. The portion of the bottom surface may be located directly beneath the position of where the at least one indentation is to be formed. An etching process may be utilized to remove the portion of a bottom surface of the second electrode. Alternatively, a portion of a bottom surface of the second electrode may be chemically treated to facilitate forming the at least one indentation. The portion of the bottom surface may be located directly beneath the position of where the at least one indentation is to be formed.


An aspect of the present disclosure provides a method for manufacturing an electrode configuration for an electrosurgical instrument. A pre-assembled jaw configuration including first and second jaw members including respective first and second electrodes is provided. One or more stop members are positioned on the first electrode. A portion of a bottom surface of the second electrode is configured to deform when a predetermined force is applied thereto. A shim may be provided between the first and second opposing electrodes. The first and second jaw members including the electrodes are approximated toward one another for contact therebetween. And, one or more indentations are formed on the second electrode. The indentation(s) may be configured to provide a jaw gap that ranges from about 0.001 inches to about 0.006 inches. The shim may be provided between the first and second opposing electrodes prior to approximating the first and second jaw members including the electrodes toward one another so as to control a depth of the at least one indentation.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

Various embodiments of the present disclosure are described hereinbelow with references to the drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an electrosurgical instrument configured for use with an end effector including jaw members having electrodes manufactured in accordance with an embodiment of the instant disclosure;



FIG. 2A is a schematic, side view of a pair of pre-assembled jaw members positioned in a pre-approximated configuration during a manufacturing process;



FIG. 2B is a schematic, side view of the pair of pre-assembled jaw members positioned in an approximated configuration during a manufacturing process;



FIG. 3 is a top, plan view of the pre-assembled jaw members subsequent to formation of an indent on an electrode of one of the jaw members; and



FIG. 4 is a flow-chart illustrating a method for manufacturing the jaw members.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Detailed embodiments of the present disclosure are disclosed herein; however, the disclosed embodiments are merely examples of the disclosure, which may be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present disclosure in virtually any appropriately detailed structure.



FIG. 1 shows an electrosurgical forceps 4 configured for use with jaw members 26, 28 including electrodes 30, 32 formed via a method of manufacture according to an embodiment of the instant disclosure. Briefly, forceps 4 generally includes a housing 6, a shaft 16, a handle assembly 8, a rotating assembly 10 and a trigger assembly 12, which mutually cooperate with an end effector assembly 14 to grasp and treat tissue. Shaft 16 includes a distal end 18 that mechanically engages end effector assembly 14 and a proximal end 20 that mechanically engages housing 6 proximate the rotating assembly 10. Handle assembly 8 includes a fixed handle 22 and a movable handle 24. End effector assembly 14 includes jaw members 26, 28 that are movable from a first position wherein the jaw members 26, 28 are spaced relative to one another to a closed position wherein the jaw members 26 and 28 cooperate to grasp tissue therebetween. Each of the jaw members 26, 28 includes an electrically conductive tissue treatment surface 30, 32, e.g., electrodes 30, 32, that is connected to an energy source (e.g., a generator not explicitly shown) that communicates electrosurgical energy, e.g., RF energy, through tissue held between jaw members 26, 28.


With reference to FIGS. 2A-4, a method 100 utilized to manufacture jaw members 26, 28 is illustrated. In accordance with the instant disclosure, jaw members 26, 28 may, initially, be provided in a pre-assembled configuration (see FIG. 4 at step 102). Specifically, jaw members 26, 28 are manufactured with jaw housings 26a, 28a, respectively, that have been formed via one or more suitable manufacturing methods. In the illustrated embodiment, for example, jaw housings 26a, 28a are formed with respective electrodes 30, 32 coupled thereto via an overmolding process to form jaw members 26, 28.


In accordance with the instant disclosure, one or both of electrodes 30, 32 may be formed with an indention 40 and/or a stop member 42 (see FIGS. 2A-3 for example). For illustrative purposes, electrode 30 is formed with stop members 42 (see FIG. 4 at step 104) and electrode 32 is formed with indentations 40.


Stop members 42 may be formed or coupled to electrode 30 via any suitable forming or coupling methods. For example, in the illustrated embodiment stop members 42 are in the form of ceramic dots that have been affixed to a tissue contacting surface of electrode 30 via one or more suitable adhesives. Stop members 42 are configured to contact electrode 32 so as to provide a specific gap distance between jaw members 26, 28 when the jaw members 26, 28 are in a clamping configuration, see FIG. 2B for example. In accordance with the instant disclosure, a suitable gap distance between jaw members 26, 28 may range from about 0.001 inches to about 0.006 inches. In certain embodiments, the gap distance may be about 0.003 inches.


Additionally, stop members 42 are configured to contact a tissue contacting surface of electrode 32 so as to form a corresponding indentation 40 thereon. Specifically, during a manufacturing process of jaw members 26, 28, jaw members 26, 28 are approximated toward one another and compressed under a suitable compressive force so that stop members 42 contact the tissue contacting surface of electrode 32 and form a corresponding indentation thereon (see FIG. 4 at step 106), i.e., jaw members 26, 28 are “over pressurized” to form the indentation. In accordance with the instant disclosure, it has been found that a suitable compressive force to indent the opposing electrode 32 when no tissue is present would be about 6 kg/cm2 to about 32 kg/cm2 or about twice the normal compressive force that would be utilized to seal tissue.


In embodiments, one or more shims 44 formed from any suitable material, e.g., ceramic, may be placed between electrodes 30, 32 prior to approximating the jaw members 26, 28 including electrodes 30, 32 toward one another so as to control a depth of indentation 40. Shim(s) 44 include a height that is approximately equal to a desired gap distance. In the illustrated embodiment for example, shim(s) 44 include a height that ranges from about 0.001 inches to about 0.006 inches. In certain embodiments, the height of shim(s) 44 may be about 0.003 inches.


In embodiments, prior to the overmolding process, electrodes 30, 32 may be chemically or otherwise treated. Specifically, a portion 46 of a bottom surface electrode 32 may be removed to facilitate forming indentations 40 on electrode 32. For example, in one particular embodiment, an etching process may be utilized to remove portion 46 of a bottom surface of one of the jaw members, e.g., jaw member 28. Alternatively, a portion 46 of the bottom surface of electrode 32 may be chemically treated with one or more suitable chemicals, e.g., acid, to remove portion 46 from electrode 32. In either embodiment, portion 46 is located directly beneath a position of where indentation 40 is to be formed on electrode 32, see FIGS. 2A-2B.


Method 100 may be carried out in the following manner. A pre-assembled jaw configuration including jaw members 26, 28 including respective electrodes 30, 32 thereon may be provided (see FIG. 4 at step 102). Stop member(s) 42 may be positioned on electrode 30 via one or more of the aforementioned affixation methods (see FIG. 4 at step 104). In embodiments, shim(s) 44 may also be positioned between electrodes 30, 32 prior to approximating jaw members 26, 28 including electrodes 30, 32 towards one another. Jaw members 26, 28 including electrodes 30, 32 are approximated toward one another so as to form corresponding indentation(s) 40 on electrode 32.


As noted above, during in-situ use of jaw members 26, 28, indentation(s) 40 may be configured to provide gap distance that ranges from about 0.001 inches to about 0.006 inches when jaw members 26, 28 are in a clamping configuration. Specifically, when tissue is to be sealed, stop member(s) 42 engage indentation(s) 40 to provide a specific gap distance between electrodes 30, 32. Moreover, a ratchet mechanism or other suitable device (not explicitly shown) may be provided on forceps 4 and may be configured to maintain a specific compressive force on tissue when tissue is clamped between jaw members 26, 28. The compressive force applied to tissue may range from about 3 kg/cm2 to about 16 kg/cm2 or about half of the compressive force that is utilized to form indentation(s) 40 on electrode 32. Further, one or more controllers or control algorithms (not explicitly shown) may be operably coupled to the forceps 4 (or provided in the generator) to control the amount of electrosurgical energy that is provided to electrodes 30, 32. All of these three factors may contribute in providing an effective, uniform and consistent tissue seal.


In accordance with the instant disclosure, the unique method 100 of manufacture of electrodes 40, 42 eliminates the aforementioned variations by incorporating self-setting features therein to precisely set a given jaw gap between the jaw members 26, 28.


Moreover, during in-situ use of jaw members 26, 28, engagement between stop member(s) 42 and indentation(s) 40 is configured to prevent jaw splay of jaw members 26, 28.


From the foregoing and with reference to the various figure drawings, those skilled in the art will appreciate that certain modifications can also be made to the present disclosure without departing from the scope of the same. For example, while the aforementioned electrodes 30, 32 have been formed via method 100 and configured for use with an endoscopic electrosurgical instrument 4, electrodes 30, 32 may be formed via method 100 and configured for use with an open type electrosurgical forceps, e.g., scissor type forceps.


While several embodiments of the disclosure have been shown in the drawings, it is not intended that the disclosure be limited thereto, as it is intended that the disclosure be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplifications of particular embodiments. Those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope and spirit of the claims appended hereto.

Claims
  • 1. A method for manufacturing an electrode configuration for an electrosurgical instrument, comprising: providing first and second jaw members including respective first and second electrodes, the first electrode having at least one stop member;removing at least a portion of a bottom surface of the second electrode to form a cavity therein;approximating the first and second jaw members including the first and second electrodes toward one another; andcontacting the at least one stop member of the first electrode with a portion of a tissue-contacting surface of the second electrode to deform the portion of the tissue-contacting surface into the cavity in the bottom surface of the electrode to form at least one indentation on the second electrode.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein approximating includes compressing the first and second jaw members with a compressive force that ranges from about 6 kg/cm2 to about 32 kg/cm2.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one stop member is a ceramic dot.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1, further comprising positioning a shim between the first and second electrodes prior to approximating the first and second jaw members including the first and second electrodes toward one another so as to control a depth of the at least one indentation.
  • 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the tissue-contacting surface and the bottom surface of the second electrode are disposed on opposite sides of the second electrode such that the cavity in the bottom surface of the second electrode and the at least one indentation formed on the tissue-contacting surface of the second electrode overlap one another.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the cavity is formed by chemically treating the portion of the bottom surface of the second electrode.
  • 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one indentation is configured to provide a jaw gap that ranges from about 0.001 inches to about 0.006 inches.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/766,563, filed on Feb. 19, 2013, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (79)
Number Name Date Kind
D249549 Pike Sep 1978 S
D263020 Rau, III Feb 1982 S
D295893 Sharkany et al. May 1988 S
D295894 Sharkany et al. May 1988 S
D298353 Manno Nov 1988 S
D299413 DeCarolis Jan 1989 S
D343453 Noda Jan 1994 S
D348930 Olson Jul 1994 S
D349341 Lichtman et al. Aug 1994 S
D354564 Medema Jan 1995 S
D358887 Feinberg May 1995 S
D384413 Zlock et al. Sep 1997 S
H1745 Paraschac Aug 1998 H
D402028 Grimm et al. Dec 1998 S
D408018 McNaughton Apr 1999 S
D416089 Barton et al. Nov 1999 S
D424694 Tetzlaff et al. May 2000 S
D425201 Tetzlaff et al. May 2000 S
H1904 Yates et al. Oct 2000 H
D449886 Tetzlaff et al. Oct 2001 S
D453923 Olson Feb 2002 S
D454951 Bon Mar 2002 S
D457958 Dycus et al. May 2002 S
D457959 Tetzlaff et al. May 2002 S
H2037 Yates et al. Jul 2002 H
D465281 Lang Nov 2002 S
D466209 Bon Nov 2002 S
D493888 Reschke Aug 2004 S
D496997 Dycus et al. Oct 2004 S
D499181 Dycus et al. Nov 2004 S
D502994 Blake, III Mar 2005 S
D509297 Wells Sep 2005 S
D525361 Hushka Jul 2006 S
D531311 Guerra et al. Oct 2006 S
D533274 Visconti et al. Dec 2006 S
D533942 Kerr et al. Dec 2006 S
7150097 Sremcich et al. Dec 2006 B2
D535027 James et al. Jan 2007 S
D538932 Malik Mar 2007 S
D541418 Schechter et al. Apr 2007 S
D541611 Aglassinge May 2007 S
D541938 Kerr et al May 2007 S
D545432 Watanabe Jun 2007 S
D547154 Lee Jul 2007 S
D564662 Moses et al. Mar 2008 S
D567943 Moses et al. Apr 2008 S
D575395 Hushka Aug 2008 S
D575401 Hixson et al. Aug 2008 S
D582038 Swoyer et al. Dec 2008 S
D617900 Kingsley et al. Jun 2010 S
D617901 Unger et al. Jun 2010 S
D617902 Twomey et al. Jun 2010 S
D617903 Unger et al. Jun 2010 S
D618798 Olson et al. Jun 2010 S
D621503 Otten et al. Aug 2010 S
D627462 Kingsley Nov 2010 S
D628289 Romero Nov 2010 S
D628290 Romero Nov 2010 S
D630324 Reschke Jan 2011 S
D649249 Guerra Nov 2011 S
D649643 Allen, IV et al. Nov 2011 S
D661394 Romero et al. Jun 2012 S
8266783 Brandt et al. Sep 2012 B2
8679140 Butcher Mar 2014 B2
RE44834 Dumbauld Apr 2014 E
20020062123 McClurken May 2002 A1
20050131390 Heinrich et al. Jun 2005 A1
20110073246 Brandt Mar 2011 A1
20120083784 Davison Apr 2012 A1
20130014375 Hempstead et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130185922 Twomey et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130255063 Hart et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140031821 Garrison Jan 2014 A1
20140031860 Stoddard et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140046323 Payne et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140052128 Townsend et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140066910 Nau, Jr. Mar 2014 A1
20140066911 Nau, Jr. Mar 2014 A1
20140074091 Arya et al. Mar 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (90)
Number Date Country
201299462 Sep 2009 CN
2415263 Oct 1975 DE
2514501 Oct 1976 DE
2627679 Jan 1977 DE
3423356 Jun 1986 DE
3612646 Apr 1987 DE
3627221 Feb 1988 DE
8712328 Mar 1988 DE
4303882 Aug 1994 DE
4403252 Aug 1995 DE
19515914 Jul 1996 DE
19506363 Aug 1996 DE
29616210 Jan 1997 DE
19608716 Apr 1997 DE
19751106 May 1998 DE
19751108 May 1999 DE
10031773 Nov 2001 DE
19946527 Dec 2001 DE
20121161 Apr 2002 DE
10045375 Oct 2002 DE
10 2004 026179 Dec 2005 DE
20 2007 009318 Aug 2007 DE
20 2007 009165 Oct 2007 DE
20 2007 009317 Oct 2007 DE
20 2007 016233 Mar 2008 DE
19738457 Jan 2009 DE
10 2008 018406 Jul 2009 DE
1159926 Dec 2001 EP
1281878 Oct 2005 EP
61-501068 Sep 1984 JP
6-502328 Mar 1992 JP
5-5106 Jan 1993 JP
5-40112 Feb 1993 JP
6-030945 Feb 1994 JP
6-121797 May 1994 JP
6-285078 Oct 1994 JP
6-343644 Dec 1994 JP
6-511401 Dec 1994 JP
7-265328 Oct 1995 JP
8-56955 Mar 1996 JP
8-317936 Mar 1996 JP
8-289895 May 1996 JP
8-252263 Oct 1996 JP
8-317934 Dec 1996 JP
9-000538 Jan 1997 JP
9-10223 Jan 1997 JP
9-122138 May 1997 JP
10-000195 Jan 1998 JP
10-24051 Jan 1998 JP
11-070124 May 1998 JP
10-155798 Jun 1998 JP
2000-102545 Sep 1998 JP
11-47149 Feb 1999 JP
11-47150 Feb 1999 JP
11-169381 Jun 1999 JP
11-192238 Jul 1999 JP
11-244298 Sep 1999 JP
2000-135222 May 2000 JP
2000-342599 Dec 2000 JP
2000-350732 Dec 2000 JP
2001-8944 Jan 2001 JP
2001-29355 Feb 2001 JP
2001-29356 Feb 2001 JP
2001-128990 May 2001 JP
2001-190564 Jul 2001 JP
2001-3400 Nov 2001 JP
2002-528166 Mar 2002 JP
2002-136525 May 2002 JP
2003-116871 Apr 2003 JP
2003-175052 Jun 2003 JP
2003-245285 Sep 2003 JP
2004-517668 Jun 2004 JP
2004-528869 Sep 2004 JP
2005-152663 Jun 2005 JP
2005-253789 Sep 2005 JP
2005-312807 Oct 2005 JP
2006-015078 Jan 2006 JP
2006-501939 Jan 2006 JP
2006-095316 Apr 2006 JP
2011-125195 Jun 2011 JP
401367 Nov 1974 SU
WO 0036986 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0059392 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0115614 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0154604 Aug 2001 WO
WO 02045589 Jun 2002 WO
WO 2005110264 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2006021269 Mar 2006 WO
WO 2008040483 Apr 2008 WO
WO 2011018154 Feb 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (100)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 08/926,869, filed Sep. 10, 1997, James G. Chandler.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/177,950, filed Oct. 23, 1998, Randel A. Frazier.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/387,883, filed Sep. 1, 1999, Dale F. Schmaltz.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/591,328, filed Jun. 9, 2000, Thomas P. Ryan.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,970, filed Dec. 17, 2008, Paul R. Sremeich.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/731,674, filed Dec. 31, 2012, Siebrecht.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/019,031, filed Sep. 5, 2013, Garrison.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/019,094, filed Sep. 5, 2013, Garrison.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/032,486, filed Sep. 20, 2013, Kendrick.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/035,423, filed Sep. 24, 2013, Garrison.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,772, filed Sep. 26, 2013, Frushour.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/041,995, filed Sep. 30, 2013, Kendrick.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/042,947, filed Oct. 1, 2013, Craig.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,039, filed Oct. 1, 2013, Rusin.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,322, filed Oct. 1, 2013, O'Neill.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,474, filed Oct. 7, 2013, Mueller.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/050,593, filed Oct. 10, 2013, Pleven.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/052,827, filed Oct. 14, 2013, Nau.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/052,856, filed Oct. 14, 2013, Latimer.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/052,871, filed Oct. 14, 2013, Kappus.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,173, filed Oct. 15, 2013, Payne.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,573, filed Oct. 15, 2013, Harper.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/064,310, filed Oct. 28, 2013, Reschke.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,644, filed Oct. 29, 2013, Reschke.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/080,564, filed Nov. 14, 2013, Lawes.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/080,581, filed Nov. 14, 2013, Kerr.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/083,696, filed Nov. 19, 2013, Horner.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,399, filed Nov. 21, 2013, Allen.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/091,505, filed Nov. 27, 2013, Garrison.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/091,521, filed Nov. 27, 2013, Garrison.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/091,532, filed Nov. 27, 2013, Garrison.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/098,953, filed Dec. 6, 2013, Cunningham.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/100,237, filed Dec. 9, 2013, Reschke.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/103,971, filed Dec. 12, 2013, Roy.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/105,374, filed Dec. 13, 2013, Moua.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/109,459, filed Dec. 17, 2013, Hoarau.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/149,343, filed Jan. 7, 2014, Schmaltz.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,618, filed Jan. 10, 2014, Artale.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,690, filed Jan. 10, 2014, Hart.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/153,346, filed Jan. 13, 2014, Collings.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/162,192, filed Jan. 23, 2014, Garrison.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/164,569, filed Jan. 27, 2014, Heard.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/169,358, filed Jan. 31, 2014, Reschke.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/172,050, filed Feb. 4, 2014, Johnson.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/173,391, filed Feb. 5, 2014, Kharin.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/176,341, filed Feb. 10, 2014, Hart.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/176,684, filed Feb. 10, 2014, Chojin.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,812, filed Feb. 11, 2014, Dycus.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/178,540, filed Feb. 12, 2014, Anderson.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/182,894, filed Feb. 18, 2014, Hart.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/182,967, filed Feb. 18, 2014, Latimer.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,090, filed Feb. 18, 2014, Arts.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,935, filed Feb. 25, 2014, Reschke.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/196,066, filed Mar. 4, 2014, McCullough.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/204,770, filed Mar. 11, 2014, Dumbauld.
Michael Choti, “Abdominoperineal Resection with the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System and LigaSure Atlas 20 cm Open Instrument” ; Innovations That Work, Jun. 2003.
Chung et al., “Clinical Experience of Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum vol. 46, No. 1 Jan. 2003.
Tinkcler L.F., “Combined Diathermy and Suction Forceps” , Feb. 6, 1967 (Feb. 6, 1965), British Medical Journal Feb. 6, 1976, vol. 1, nr. 5431 p. 361, ISSN: 0007-1447.
Carbonell et al., “Comparison of theGyrus PlasmaKinetic Sealer and the Valleylab LigaSure Device in the Hemostasis of Small, Medium, and Large-Sized Arteries” Carolinas Laparoscopic and Advanced Surgery Program, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC; Date: Aug. 2003.
Peterson et al. “Comparison of Healing Process Following Ligation with Sutures and Bipolar Vessel Sealing” Surgical Technology International (2001).
“Electrosurgery: A Historical Overview” Innovations in Electrosurgery; Sales—Product Literature; Dec. 31, 2000.
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealing Device in Hemorrhoidectomy” Sales—Product Literature; Jan. 2004.
E. David Crawford “Evaluation of a New Vessel Sealing Device in Urologic Cancer Surgery” Sales—Product Literature 2000.
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hemorrhoidectormy” American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinicla Congress Poster (2000).
Muller et al., “Extended Left Hemicolectomy Using the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System” Innovations That Work, Sep. 1999.
Kennedy et al. “High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing” Surgical Endoscopy (1998) 12: 876-878.
Burdette et al. “In Vivo Probe Measurement Technique for Determining Dielectric Properties at VHF Through Microwave Frequencies”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-28, No. 4, Apr. 1980 pp. 414-427.
Carus et al., “Initial Experience With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Abdominal Surgery” Innovations That Work, Jun. 2002.
Heniford et al. “Initial Research and Clinical Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Oct. 1999.
Heniford et al. “Initial Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Surgical Endoscopy (2000) 15:799-801.
Herman et al., “Laparoscopic Intestinal Resection With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: A Case Report”; Innovations That Work, Feb. 2002.
Koyle et al., “Laparoscopic Palomo Varicocele Ligation in Children and Adolescents” Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques, vol. 6, No. 1, 2002.
W. Scott Helton, “LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: Revolutionary Hemostasis Product for General Surgery”; Sales—Product Literature 1999.
LigaSure Vessel Sealing System, the Seal of Confidence in General, Gynecologic, Urologic, and Laparaoscopic Surgery; Sales—Product Literature; Apr. 2002.
Joseph Ortenberg “LigaSure System Used in Laparoscopic 1st and 2nd Stage Orchiopexy” Innovations That Work, Nov. 2002.
Sigel et al. “The Mechanism of Blood Vessel Closure by High Frequency Electrocoagulation” Surgery Gynecology & Obstetrics, Oct. 1965 pp. 823-831.
Sampayan et al, “Multilayer Ultra-High Gradient Insulator Technology” Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, 1998. Netherlands Aug. 17-21, 1998; vol. 2, pp. 740-743.
Paul G. Horgan, “A Novel Technique for Parenchymal Division During Hepatectomy” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 181, No. 3, Apr. 2001 pp. 236-237.
Benaron et al., “Optical Time-Of-Flight and Absorbance Imaging of Biologic Media”, Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, vol. 259, Mar. 5, 1993, pp. 1463-1466.
Olsson et al. “Radical Cystectomy in Females” Current Surgical Techniques in Urology, vol. 14, Issue 3, 2001.
Palazzo et al. “Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy” British Journal of Surgery 2002, 89, 154-157.
Levy et al. “Randomized Trial of Suture Versus Electrosurgical Bipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 102, No. 1, Jul. 2003.
“Reducing Needlestick Injuries in the Operating Room” Sales—Product Literature 2001.
Bergdahl et al. “Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic Computerized Bipolar Coagulator” J.Neurosurg, vol. 75, Jul. 1991, pp. 148-151.
Strasberg et al. “A Phase I Study of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hepatic Surgery” Section of HPB Surger, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, Presented at AHPBA, Feb. 2001.
Sayfan et al. “Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy: A New Technique” Annals of Surgery vol. 234 No. 1 Jul. 2001; pp. 21-24.
Levy et al., “Update on Hysterectomy—New Technologies and Techniques” OBG Management, Feb. 2003.
Dulemba et al. “Use of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealer in Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy” Sales—Product Literature; Jan. 2004.
Strasberg et al., “Use of a Bipolar Vessel-Sealing Device for Parenchymal Transection During Liver Surgery” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 6, No. 4, Jul.-Aug. 2002 pp. 569-574.
Sengupta et al., “Use of a Computer-Controlled Bipolar Diathermy System in Radical Prostatectomies and Other Open Urological Surgery” ANZ Journal of Surgery (2001) 71.9 pp. 538-540.
Rothenberg et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children” Int'l Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) 2000.
Crawford et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Urologic Cancer Surgery” Grand Rounds in Urology 1999 vol. 1 Issue 4 pp. 10-17.
Craig Johnson, “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Bloodless Hemorrhoidectomy” Innovations That Work, Mar. 2000.
Levy et al. “Use of a New Energy-based Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) World Congress 1999.
Barbara Levy, “Use of a New Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” FIGO 2000, Washington, D.C.
E. David Crawford “Use of a Novel Vessel Sealing Technology in Management of the Dorsal Veinous Complex” Sales—Product Literature 2000.
Jarrett et al., “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System for Peri-Hilar Vessels in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy” Sales—Product Literature 2000.
Crouch et al. “A Velocity-Dependent Model for Needle Insertion in Soft Tissue” MICCAI 2005; LNCS 3750 pp. 624-632, Dated: 2005.
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Pelvic Surgery” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics FIGO World Congress 2000, Washington, D.C.
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Gynecologic Surgery” Sales—Product Literature 1999.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140230243 A1 Aug 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61766563 Feb 2013 US