1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a method for manufacturing and converting of paper.
2. Description of the Related Art
During the paper manufacturing process a multitude of characteristics, mostly mechanical or technological paper characteristics which are important for one or more subsequent converting processes are determined. These change during production to a greater or lesser extent, even within a specific type of paper, and across the web width. A particular converting process may, for example, be a printing process, a formatting process, specifically a cutting process, etc.
Web shrinkage for example, is dependent not only on the specific cross width position, but also on the fiber characteristics and the tensions in the paper machine.
The aforementioned position related information regarding web characteristics are not available to the printer. As far as shrinkage is concerned, the printer is possibly familiar with the shrinkage across the entire width of an entire roll.
One of the most pressing problems in news print are the varying width expansion characteristics in the paper during printing, specifically during color printing. The reason for this is the effect of moisture on the paper during printing. During a multi-color printing process the web runs through several printing stations within a short time period. Hitherto the art work had to be adjusted to the expansion characteristics of the paper, resulting in corresponding time and raw material losses at the printers.
Individual paper rolls display individually different moisture related expansion characteristics. Paper, manufactured at the edge of the paper machine, displays a greater moisture expansion, as well as related greater tolerance values.
During the production process through to completion, the paper shrinks in varying degrees, in transverse direction to the web direction.
Two possible cross directional shrinkage curves are illustrated in
The shrinkage is generally uniformly constant in the center, while the paper tends to increasingly shrink toward both edges. While the shrinkage depicted in
The paper produced in the paper machine is subsequently wound on so-called reel spools. The resulting fully wound rolls normally have a width of 2 m to more than 10 m and a diameter of almost 4 m, and possibly more.
Initial converting of these fully wound rolls takes place at the paper manufacturer. The preference is to convert paper for news print into smaller rolls on roll slitters. Common widths are 0.3 m to 1.4 m, sometimes even 2.8 m and diameters from 0.9 m to 1.5 m, whereby the tendency here too is for larger dimensions. Paper intended for cardboard packaging is usually cut into individual sheets on sheet cutters.
For ease of presentation we refer in the following text primarily to roll paper. However, the same conditions also apply to sheet paper.
During the printing process the paper expands transversely to the direction of travel. This expansion, or fan out, is in direct relationship to the shrinkage described above.
Paper, that shrank uniformly across its entire width during production, expands (fans out) again uniformly during printing. In partially multicolored printed paper, this fan out may be compensated for by offsetting the printing plates in the subsequent print stations by some 1/10 mm toward the web edge. Also, targeted expansion of the printing plates, for example in full-area color printing, is possible.
Paper that did not shrink uniformly during production becomes problematic with increasing roll widths. Therefore, non-uniform shrinking during paper production results in non-constant expansion or fan out during printing. Registration problems may only be compensated partially through the aforementioned measures. Fan out during printing may measure from several tenths of a millimeter to 3 mm or more, depending on the type of paper and the specific location on the roll. With increasing width of rolls that do not have constant transverse shrinkage, it becomes increasingly more difficult, particularly with full-area color print, to achieve the desired quality print result. In order to achieve the optimum print results the printing plates should for example be expanded at the edge of the roll by 3 mm, whereby the expansion should reduce to 0.3 mm toward the roll center, in order to remain at a constant 0.3 mm for the remaining roll half. A further problem exists in that an uneven web tension may occur in the printing machine when converting such rolls. To begin with, this is to be attributed to the non-linear longitudinal expansion behavior which, in turn, is dependent on the respective transverse shrinkage during production. This uneven web tension increases the risk of web breaks on one side and may lead to registration problems on the other side of the roll and, in extreme cases, may lead to wrinkle formation.
In a method for influencing the fan out in wet-offset rotary printing—known from German patent document no. DE 199 18 399 A1—a width or cross directional fan out of the paper web is determined by measuring one run of a paper web between a pull roll of a pre-tensioning device located prior to several printing cylinders, and an outfeed pull roll following the printing cylinders. The determined width of cross directional fan out is utilized for the drive control of at least one of the pull rolls, in order to achieve a constant width, or transverse fan out of the paper web. In this instance, the values utilized for the control are measured in the printing press area.
The present invention provides an improved method of manufacturing and converting paper in which the aforementioned disadvantages have been eliminated.
The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
a is a plot of the cross directional shrinkage behavior during production of a paper web;
b is another plot of the cross directional shrinkage behavior during production of a paper web;
a is a schematic illustration of the shrinkage profile of a parent roll;
b is a schematic illustration for explanation of an approximation of the shrinkage curve and its possible description of the deflection and edge offset parameters;
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplifications set out herein illustrate one preferred embodiment of the invention, in one form, and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
In accordance with the current invention for the purpose of optimization of a converting process, information that was determined during paper production regarding a particular paper is transmitted to and considered in the respective converting process.
A particular converting process may for example, be a printing process, a formatting process, specifically a cutting process, etc. It is also fundamentally possible to consider such information gained during the paper production in several converting processes.
Information regarding a specific paper as determined during production and transmitted to and considered during the converting process can include mechanical and/or technological characteristics. Specifically, these may be characteristics such as tensile strength, fan out behavior, gloss, smoothness, density, fiber orientation, basis weight, moisture, roughness and/or other characteristics of that kind.
In certain instances it may also be advantageous if paper specific information discovered during paper production and transmitted to and considered during the respective converting process would include information regarding the paper components or paper composition. The relevant information may for example refer to filler type, filler volume, fiber type, fiber volume, chemical additives, etc.
In another useful form of the method according to the invention, paper specific information discovered during paper production and transmitted to and considered during the respective converting process would include information regarding at least one characteristic and/or composition longitudinal profile. For example “linear footage” related information may be transmitted and considered.
In certain instances it may also be advantageous if at least one characteristic and/or combination cross profile is transmitted to and considered during the respective converting process.
In another advantageous form of the method according to the current invention, paper specific information discovered during paper production and transmitted to and considered during the respective converting process would include information regarding at least one longitudinal profile and at least one cross directional profile of data affecting the paper web. In this context, specifically the transmission of a relevant information screen or information net would be possible.
Information determined during paper production can be allocated to each roll via a data medium following a roll slitting process. Specifically, the roll slitting process may occur in the paper factory.
In one embodiment of the method in accordance with the invention in which the converting process is a printing process, the shrinkage of a particular paper that occurred during the manufacturing process is considered accordingly during printing, in order to optimize the printing process.
During subsequent printing, paper and location-specific characteristics are available which may accordingly be used for remote control of the printing machine. Based on the location-specific information, a constant optimum registration setting may, for example, be possible.
In the method according to the invention, it can also be taken into account that the determining parameter for the moisture based expansion during printing is the cross directional shrinkage of a paper web occurring during paper production.
Based on this cross directional shrinkage occurring individually during paper production, the roll-specific expansion of a paper roll during printing is predictable.
Such a prediction can be based, for example, on otherwise constant edge characteristics such as:
The standard model for the prediction of the fan out may be expanded as desired, taking into account such edge characteristic parameters.
Just how many parameters are considered depends on the intended purpose. In the area of newsprint, accuracies of some 1/100 mm are sufficient. When printing folding box carton, distinctly higher accuracies are necessary.
During printing, the fan out as well as web tension differentials across the roll can be compensated for by suitable measures on the basis of the shrink characteristics of the paper.
The cross directional shrinkage which occurs during manufacture of a paper web is well known. Therefore, the cross directional shrinkage curve is calculated on all paper machines equipped with a Voith Sulzer ModuleJet® headbox and software package Profilmatic M®.
In doing so, individual values from across the web (for example, at distances of approximately 65 mm) are available for the cross directional web shrinkage. The appropriate values are continuously updated and recorded by the Voith Sulzer ModuleJet®.
Paper factories establish a data record for every produced roll whereby usually consecutive numbering, that is, the so-called “roll number”, serves as a control key. These data records normally include the web width and the overall roll length, the basis weight, the paper type and several longitudinal and cross directional profile values. These data records serve as a basis for further converting and also as investigational material in the event of customer complaints. For example, the relevant specific characteristics could be allocated individually to each produced “square meter”.
In accordance with the invention, the existing data structure could then specifically be updated with the individual shrinkage values. This could, for example, be accomplished by recording cross directional shrinkage values at (cross directional) distances of 10 cm after every kilometer of paper length. Depending upon requirements, other distances are also possible. If converting requirements of the paper are established (i.e., the required width of a paper roll), then the average value of the relevant shrinkage values in longitudinal and cross direction, as well as the individual cross directional shrinkage curve can be determined.
This will permit the printer to determine for a particular paper type which fan out corresponds with the shrinkage value of a paper roll having constant shrinkage. The printer is then in a position to use this thereby determined factor between shrinkage value and fan out for every additional roll of that particular paper type, thus compensating for fan out in advance.
For simplification, the shrinkage curve may, for example, be approximated by a straight line or a segment of a circle and be described by a deflection value and an edge offset value.
If a printer is to print a paper roll having irregular shrinkage, then the printer has parameters available with the help of which he can make targeted corrections.
With newspapers that are not fully color printed, the roll side having the lower shrinkage values may be chosen for the color segment. On papers whose entire area is printed, the expansion of the art work from its rectangular basic shape to a trapezoid shape could be compensated for with the help of the aforementioned straight line for the description of the shrinkage curve, in order to improve the print result accordingly. The straight line is defined, for example, by the two shrinkage values present at the roll edge. Based on the now known correlation between the shrinkage value and the fan out, it enables the printer to adapt the printing plate accordingly.
In order to compensate for uneven cross directional web tensions, one embodiment includes installing a so-called spreader roll. The paper can wrap around the roll in an obtuse angle. If the curve of the spreader roll points into the direction of the peak of this obtuse angle, then the web tension in the center of the paper web is increased to a maximum, while reducing it toward the paper web edges. If the curve points in the direction of a leg of the obtuse angle, or is accomplished through appropriate pivoting of the spreader roll so that the paper only touches the roll, then the web tension distribution remains largely unchanged. By pivoting of the curve between these two positions, any intermediate values of this web tension influence may also be determined.
Another embodiment removes uneven paper fan out through targeted moistening. With the assistance of one of the hitherto known methods for metered application onto the paper web (as utilized on coaters) targeted moisture is applied onto the paper in the printing press, so that, for example, paper areas having lower shrinkage values are moistened more heavily than paper areas having higher shrinkage values, resulting in a more uniform expansion of the paper.
The relevant shrinkage rating can be noted on the roll label during packaging of the paper at the paper factory. Even the paper web can be marked with the relevant data during the production process at the paper mill. In the simplest case scenario, information is printed in the edge area in the visible wave range by a high speed printer and is then scanned at the latest during printing. Other identification methods which produce information in the non-visible area, and which therefore also do not have a negative influence on the printing quality, are also possible. This information can be applied not only in the edge area of the web, but also on the edge of a roll.
Concerning the location for information application onto the paper, this can be done at several locations simultaneously in the paper machine. But it is, for example, also possible to apply this information at the time of cross or longitudinal cutting of the web, i.e., at the edge of the sheets or the rolls. All process steps occurring during paper production that are relevant to the printing process can be combined with each other so that the relevant information, together with the location information, is transmitted to the recording device at the cutting device. The advantage of such an arrangement is that the printing process can be optimized and that a simple and clear allocation exists between the respectively described characteristics and the location, despite a large volume of data.
Instead of documenting the position-related information on the paper web, this can also be provided to the printer in the form of a separate data storage medium, i.e., a CD-ROM, or via a data network. In this instance, a clear allocation of the data record to the specific paper roll, or pallet must be ensured. The particular advantage of such a system, in addition to optimization of the printing process, is that the data is provided prior to the web or sheet entering the printing press.
Since there are now more possibilities available to the printing operation for compensation of certain negative paper characteristics, edge papers can specifically be used which hitherto were categorized as inferior compared to papers from the center area.
For example, the following shrinkage control is possible: in many instances the required finished roll width or sheet width is a factor already known during the master spool production. The paper shrinkage can be adjusted and/or controlled so that the paper shrinkage of the left end roll—when viewed in direction of paper travel—decreases linearly toward the paper machine center, remains constant on the neighboring rolls, and lastly, viewed in the direction of paper travel, again increases linearly on the right end roll. In order to control shrinkage, air may be introduced to the felt underside. This creates a type of air cushion between the felt and the paper in whose area the paper shrinks linearly. Depending on the influence over the moisture profile, the air may be introduced directly or by blowing onto a drying cylinder. The flow through the drying cylinder can be adjusted through air pressure. Ideally, such an air cushion should be formed in the area of the edge roll width, with the exception of the outermost web edge.
Local paper web shrinkage information can be determined, for example, by evaluating identifications which were applied prior to the shrinkage zone and which are evaluated after the shrinkage zone. The following identifications come to mind in this context:
In addition, it is possible to apply identifications before the shrinkage zone (dryer section) and to determine the local shrinkage after the shrinkage zone.
In the present invention, the paper characteristics-related data of a paper roll is passed on to the printer for optimization of the printing process. The invention is applicable not only for paper, including cardboard, but also for other printed materials.
If the converting process is, for example, a printing process, then the shrinkage that occurred during the paper production may be considered accordingly during printing in an effort to optimize the printing process.
As can be seen from
a is a schematic illustration of the shrinkage profile SP of a master roll 17 whereby after cutting of slitting into roll format the result is, for example, two straight lines 10 located in the center area, as well as two edge cuts 12. Master roll 17 can be slit into a plurality of individual rolls. The shrinkage profile in the center area can therefore be approximated by a respective straight line 10. The two edge cuts 12 are approximated by a segment of a circle 12′ and described by a deflection value 14 and an edge offset value 16.
Data can be printed on roll 17 or a roll label 19. Data can also be stored on a separate data medium 21 (
In order to compensate for uneven cross directional web tensions, a so-called spreader roll 18 (
If the curve of the spreader roll 18 points toward the peak (i.e., base or point of origin) of this preferably obtuse angle, the tension in the center of the web is increased to a maximum, while reducing toward the paper edges. If the curve points in the direction of a leg of this angle, or if pivoting of the spreader roll causes the paper 20 to only touch this spreader roll 18, then the distribution of tension in the paper web 20 remains largely unchanged. By pivoting the curve of spreader roll 18 between these two positions, any intermediate values of this web tension influence may also be determined.
If paper having constant shrinkage is used for printing, then no irregular fan out is to be expected. Consequently, the web tension in the printing press should also be distributed evenly cross directionally to the direction of travel L of the paper. The spreader roll 18 would then need to be adjusted so that it has no influence over the web tension.
In order to compensate for uneven web tension during printing on a paper roll having irregular shrinkage, the spreader roll 18 is placed perpendicular to the direction of paper travel L on one side, so that this results in compensating for the edge offset 16 described in
While this invention has been described as having a preferred design, the present invention can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 11 067 | Mar 2000 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5771174 | Spinner et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781440 | Adamy | Jul 1998 | A |
6086237 | Gorinevsky et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094604 | Bucher et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099178 | Spurr et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6126785 | Hu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6168687 | Hu et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200422 | Shakespeare et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217940 | Kuni | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6392681 | Wood et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
89 10 551 | Sep 1989 | DE |
196 32 988 | Jan 1998 | DE |
199 18 399 | Nov 1999 | DE |
0 826 821 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0 891 863 | Jan 1999 | EP |
WO 97 18 349 | May 1997 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20010020523 A1 | Sep 2001 | US |