Method for manufacturing high toughness sintered bodies

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 4626518
  • Patent Number
    4,626,518
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 11, 1984
    41 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 2, 1986
    38 years ago
Abstract
A method for manufacture of a high toughness sintered body, characterized by sintering a shaped body of a mixed powder consisting essentially of from 40 to 70% by weight of a first component of powdered ZrO.sub.2 containing at least one stabilizer selected from the group consisting of Y.sub.2 O.sub.3, CaO, and MgO and having an average particle diameter of not more than 1.mu. and from 30 to 60% by weight of a second component of powdered .alpha.-Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 having an average particle diameter of not more than 1 .mu.m, which mixed powder may also contain not more than 3% by weight of SiO.sub.2, not more than 0.5% by weight of Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3, or not more than 0.5% by weight of TiO.sub.2 in a combined proportion of not more than 3% by weight at a temperature in the range of from 1400.degree. C. to 1600.degree. C. under normal pressure thereby producing a sintered body wherein at least 90% by weight of ZrO.sub.2 particles present therein are accounted for by tetragonal and cubic crystals, the ratio of said tetragonal crystals to said cubic crystals is at least 1:3, and the average crystal particle diameter of the entire sintered body is at least 3.mu..
Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to high toughness sintered bodies comprising at least one of ZrO.sub.2 and HfO.sub.2, at least one of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 and TiN, etc.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Production of ceramic materials having improved flexural strength has been the subject of research by many investigators, because poor flexural strength is a most serious disadvantage of ceramic materials, and if ceramic materials having improved flexural strength can be developed, they can be effectively used in the fabrication of cutting tools, as synthetic bone materials, as parts for internal combustion engines, and so forth.
For example, Japanese Patent Application (OPI) No. 140762/80 (the term "OPI" as used herein refers to a "published unexamined Japanese patent application") discloses "zirconia-base cutting tool materials" comprising ZrO.sub.2 partially stabilized with oxides of Y, Ca, Mg, etc., in which the total fraction of tetragonal and cubic ZrO.sub.2 is from 60 to 95% by weight. J. S. Reed et al., Ceramic Bulletin, Vol. 55, page 717 (1976) describes that high strength ZrO.sub.2 sintered bodies can be obtained by sintering fine powdered ZrO.sub.2 which is prepared by co-precipitating a mixture of ZrOCl.sub.2 and YCl.sub.3, calcining the thus-formed powder, and stabilizing with Y.sub.2 O.sub.3.
These ceramic materials, however, are not completely satisfactory in strength, and it has, therefore, been desired to further increase the strength, because it is expected that such improved ceramic materials would have a wider variety of uses.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
As a result of extensive investigations to further increase the strength of such ceramic materials, it has been found that when Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, TiN, or a combination thereof is added to form a solid solution in combination with ZrO.sub.2 ("ZrO.sub.2 " as used herein generally is intended also to refer to ZrO.sub.2 wherein HfO.sub.2 is substituted in part or in whole therefor) or is dispersed in ZrO.sub.2, the transformation temperature of ZrO.sub.2 between the tetragonal ZrO.sub.2 and the monoclinic ZrO.sub.2 is lowered and grain growth of ZrO.sub.2 is prevented, which increases the fraction of tetragonal ZrO.sub.2, the sliding resistance among ZrO.sub.2 grains in the grain boundaries, and hardness, and, furthermore, increases the high temperature (up to 1200.degree. C.) strength to as high as about 2 times the strength of ZrO.sub.2 alone.
The present invention, therefore, relates to a high toughness sintered body consisting essentially of from 40 to 99.5% by weight Component A and from 0.5 to 60% by weight Component B, wherein the mean grain size of the sintered body is 3 microns or less, wherein:
Component A is partially stabilized ZrO.sub.2 (containing, e.g., a stabilizer such as Y.sub.2 O.sub.3, CaO, and MgO) in which the fraction of the tetragonal and cubic ZrO.sub.2 are at least 90% by weight, and the ratio of the tetragonal ZrO.sub.2 to the cubic ZrO.sub.2 is at least 1/3; and
Component B is at least one of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 and TiN, with impurities being 3% by weight or less SiO.sub.2, 0.5% by weight or less Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3, and 0.5% by weight or less TiO.sub.2, provided that the total amount of impurities is 3% by weight or less (based on the total weight).
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, it has been found that when a co-precipitation method is employed to prepare a raw material consisting essentially of the components of ZrO.sub.2 (and/or HfO.sub.2), stabilizer, and Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 (and/or TiN) the resulting raw materials are dispersed more ideally, and by using the resulting raw materials, a sintered body can be obtained which has a uniform structure comprising fine grains, contains almost no micropores, and which has a strength as high as about 150 kg/mm.sup.2 that could not be expected from conventional ceramic materials.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows the high temperature strength of sintered bodies described in Example 1 and of a comparative specimen (No. R), i.e., commercially available partially stabilized zirconia sintered body manufactured by Corning Corp.
FIG. 2 shows the high temperature strength of sintered bodies described in Example 2.
FIG. 3 shows the high temperature strength of sintered bodies described in Example 3 and of the above-described comparative specimen (No. R).
FIG. 4 shows the high temperature strength of sintered bodies described in Example 4.
FIG. 5 shows the high temperature strength of sintered bodies described in Example 5 and of the above-described comparative specimen (No. R).





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In the high toughness sintered body of the invention, if the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 or TiN content is less than 0.5% by weight, the effect of the addition of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 or TiN is poor respectively, whereas if it is more than 60% by weight, ZrO.sub.2 content is too low to give effect of strengthening and toughening due to ZrO.sub.2 phase transformation.
Furthermore, the total fraction of the tetragonal ZrO.sub.2 and the cubic ZrO.sub.2 in the ZrO.sub.2 should be at least 90% by weight thereof. When the fraction is less than 90% by weight, the toughness of the resulting sintered body is poor. It is also necessary that the ratio of the tetragonal ZrO.sub.2 to the cubic ZrO.sub.2 be at least 1/3. If the ratio is less than 1/3, the resulting sintered body has poor toughness. It is further required for the mean grain size of the sintered body to be 3 microns or less. If the mean grain size is more than 3 microns, the transformation from the tetragonal ZrO.sub.2 to the monoclinic ZrO.sub.2 will occur, resulting in a reduction in toughness.
The tolerable amounts of impurities are up to 3% by weight in the case of SiO.sub.2 and up to 0.5% by weight each in the case of Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 and TiO.sub.2, provided that the total amount of such impurities is 3% by weight or less. If the amount of each impurity or the total amount of impurities is more than the above-specified values, sintering properties are reduced, and only a sintered body having poor toughness can be obtained.
The same characteristics as above can also be obtained when part of all of the ZrO.sub.2 is replaced by HfO.sub.2.
The following examples are given to illustrate the invention in greater detail.
EXAMPLE 1
To a monoclinic ZrO.sub.2 having the characteristics shown in Table 1 were added Y.sub.2 O.sub.3, CaO, or MgO as a stabilizer in the proportions shown in Table 2, and then fine particles of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 having a mean particle size of 0.1 micron and a purity of 99.9% were added in proportions as shown in Table 2. The ingredients were then wet-mixed, and the resulting mixture was dried, powdered, press-molded, and sintered in an electric furnace in the air at 1,400.degree. to 1,650.degree. C. for 1 hour. After sintering, the thus-obtained sintered body was cut and ground to form a specimen of 4.times.8.times.25 mm. In this way, a series of specimens were produced. The phase composition and properties obtained from these specimens are shown in Table 2. In all the specimens, the mean grain size was less than 3 microns. When the sintering temperature was increased to higher temperatures than those shown in Table 2, the mean grain size was larger than 3 microns, and the strength was reduced.
As is shown clearly from Table 2, the addition of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 inhibits the transformation from the tetragonal ZrO.sub.2 to the monoclinic ZrO.sub.2 and increases the fraction of the tetragonal ZrO.sub.2, improving the strength and toughness of the resulting sintered body. The hardness and high temperature flexural strength of some specimens were also measured. The results are shown in Table 3 and FIG. 1. It can be seen from the results that the hardness of the sintered body increased with increasing Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 content, for example, the hardness of specimen No. 33 with 60% Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 content was almost equal to that of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ceramics, and that the high temperature strength is markedly improved compared with the comparative partially stabilized zirconia sintered body which is commercially available from Corning Corp., U.S.A. (Specimen No. R).
TABLE 1______________________________________Crystal System MonoclinicSpecific Surface Area 25 m.sup.2 /gChemical Analytical ValuesZrO.sub.2 (incl. HfO.sub.2) 99% or more (containing 3 to 5% HfO.sub.2)SiO.sub.2 0.5%CaO 0.06%Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.1%TiO.sub.2 0.25%______________________________________
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________Composition Stabilizer Crystal System of ZrO.sub.2 for ZrO.sub.2 Sintering Flexural Mono- Tetra-Specimen Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Amount Temperature Density Strength K.sub.IC clinic gonal CubicNo. (wt. %) Type (mol %) (.degree.C.) (g/cm.sup.3) (kg/mm.sup.2) (kg/mm.sup.3/2) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) Remarks__________________________________________________________________________ 1 0.1 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 4 1,600 5.72 35.1 9.3 24 41 35 Comparison 2 0.5 " " " 5.80 70.5 21.0 9 58 33 Present Invention 3 1.5 " " " 5.83 72.4 22.5 4 64 32 Present Invention 4 3 " 1 1,500 * -- -- 95 0 5 Comparison 5 " " 1.5 1,400 5.76 35.7 18.0 43 49 8 " 6 " " 2 1,500 5.97 95.9 44.9 5 83 12 Present Invention 7 " " 2.5 " 5.95 91.7 37.8 4 77 19 Present Invention 8 " " 3 1,600 5.94 82.3 30.2 3 73 24 Present Invention 9 " " 4 " 5.88 84.1 23.8 1 67 32 Present Invention10 " " 6 " 5.75 44.6 15.0 0 28 72 Present Invention11 " " 8 " 5.67 31.2 13.0 0 0 100 Comparison12 " MgO 7 1,500 5.75 70.0 21.0 3 61 36 Present Invention13 " CaO 6 " 5.78 65.0 19.0 4 55 41 Present Invention14 10 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 1 " * -- -- 96 0 4 Comparison15 " " 2 " 5.71 99.4 38.8 4 85 11 Present Invention16 " " 3 " 5.69 87.2 32.5 2 76 22 Present Invention17 " " 4 " 5.64 85.3 30.0 1 70 29 Present Invention18 " MgO 7 " 5.53 72.5 29.1 0 68 32 Present Invention19 " CaO 6 " 5.55 67.4 27.3 0 63 37 Present Invention20 20 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 1 " 5.45 102.2 33.6 9 87 4 Present Invention21 " " 2 " 5.43 110.8 35.0 0 90 10 Present Invention22 " " 3 " 5.41 95.1 30.9 0 81 19 Present Invention23 " " 4 " 5.37 93.0 28.2 0 74 26 Present Invention24 " MgO 7 " 5.28 79.1 27.3 0 71 29 Present Invention25 " CaO 6 " 5.30 73.5 26.2 0 67 33 Present Invention26 40 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 1 " 4.97 107.3 27.7 0 97 3 Present Invention27 " " 2 " 4.96 121.3 26.8 0 93 7 Present Invention28 " " 3 " 4.94 106.4 25.5 0 86 14 Present Invention29 " " 4 " 4.92 104.1 24.5 0 81 19 Present Invention30 " MgO 7 " 4.87 88.5 23.9 0 78 22 Present Invention31 " CaO 6 " 4.88 82.2 23.4 0 75 25 Present Invention32 60 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 1 1,600 4.61 82.5 22.0 0 97 3 Present Invention33 " " 2 " 4.59 75.0 21.8 0 94 6 Present Invention34 " " 3 " 4.59 65.8 21.2 0 88 12 Present Invention35 " " 4 " 4.58 64.4 20.9 0 84 16 Present Invention36 " MgO 7 " 4.55 54.7 20.7 0 82 18 Present Invention37 " CaO 6 " 4.55 50.8 20.6 0 79 21 Present Invention38 70 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 2 " 4.43 43.3 11.5 0 94 6 Comparison__________________________________________________________________________ *disintegration
TABLE 3______________________________________ Specimen No. 6 15 21 27 33______________________________________Amount of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 (wt %) 3 10 20 40 60Hardness 83.5 84.0 85.1 86.5 87.7______________________________________
Note:
Measurement of Physical Properties
(1) The flexural strength was measured according to JIS B4104-1970, and an average value of five specimens is indicated.
(2) The fracture toughness was measured according to ASTM Special Technical Publication No. 410; i.e., a specimen having a width of 4 mm, a thickness of 5 mm, and a length of 25 mm was provided with a notch having a depth of 0.5 mm and a width of 0.15 mm, and was measured by a three-point bending test with a span as 20 mm. An average value of five specimens is indicated.
(3) The hardness was measured by the use of a Rockwell Super Fischal hardness tester at a load of 45 kg.
(4) The crystal system was analyzed by X-ray diffraction using Geiger Flex Model RAD-.gamma.A manufactured by Rigaku Denki Co., Ltd. In the first place, by X-ray diffraction of a specimen which had been mirror-polished with a 15.mu. diamond paste, the integrated strength Im of each of the (111) plane and the (111) plane of monoclinic ZrO.sub.2, the integrated strength It of the (111) plane of tetragonal ZrO.sub.2, and the integrated strength Ic of the (111) plane of cubic ZrO.sub.2 were measured, and the fraction of monoclinic ZrO.sub.2 was determined by the ratio of Im/(Im+It+Ic). Then the sintered body was ground until all particles could pass through a 325 mesh screen and the ground particles were analyzed by X-ray diffraction under the same conditions as above to measure the integrated strength I'm of monoclinic ZrO.sub.2 and the integrated strength I'c of cubic ZrO.sub.2. In this case, it is considered that the residual tetragonal ZrO.sub.2 in the sintered body is subjected to mechanical stress by the above-described pulverization and undergoes a transformation into monoclinic ZrO.sub.2. Therefore, the fraction of cubic ZrO.sub.2 is determined by the ratio of I'c/(I'm+I'c) and then the fraction of tetragonal ZrO.sub.2 is determined.
EXAMPLE 2
An aqueous solution of zirconium oxychloride and an aqueous solution of yttrium chloride were mixed, co-precipitated, and calcined at 800.degree. to prepare a powder consisting of ZrO.sub.2 and Y.sub.2 O.sub.3. The characteristics of the powder are shown in Table 4. To the co-precipitated powder was added Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 powder having a mean particle size of 0.1 .mu.m and a purity of 99.9% in the proportions shown in Table 5. Using the powder, a sintered body was produced in the same manner as in Example 1. The results are shown in Table 5. The high temperature strength was measured in the same manner as in Example 1, and the results are shown in FIG. 2. It can be seen from the results that even when the co-precipitated ZrO.sub.2 powder is used, the addition of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 provides a great effect, as was the case in Example 1.
TABLE 4______________________________________Amount of Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 2 mol % 3 mol %Crystal System Tetragonal TetragonalSpecific Surface Area 32 m.sup.2 /g 34 m.sup.2 /gChemical Analytical ValuesZrO.sub.2 (incl. HfO.sub.2) 95% (containing 93.7% (containing 3 to 5% HfO.sub.2) 3 to 5% HfO.sub.2)Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 4.04% 5.30%CaO 0.09% 0.06%Na.sub.2 O 0.05% 0.05%______________________________________
TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________Composition Stabilizer Crystal System of ZrO.sub.2 for ZrO.sub.2 Sintering Flexural Mono- Tetra-Specimen Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Amount Temperature Density Strength K.sub.IC clinic gonal CubicNo. (wt %) Type (mol %) (.degree.C.) (g/cm.sup.3) (kg/mm.sup.2) (kg/mm.sup.3/2) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) Remarks__________________________________________________________________________101 20 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 2 1,500 5.51 112.5 35.4 0 94 6 Present Invention102 " " 3 " 5.48 96.7 31.2 0 87 13 Present Invention103 40 " 2 " 5.03 124.0 27.3 0 97 3 Present Invention104 " " 3 " 5.01 108.1 25.9 0 90 10 Present Invention105 60 " 2 1,600 4.63 78.3 22.1 0 97 3 Present Invention106 " " 3 " 4.62 70.1 21.5 0 91 9 Present Invention__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 3
To a monoclinic ZrO.sub.2 having the characteristics shown in Table 1 above were added Y.sub.2 O.sub.3, Cao, or MgO as a stabilizer in the proportions shown in Table 6, and then fine particles of TiN having a mean particle size of 0.1 micron and a purity of 99.9% were added in proportions as shown in Table 6. The ingredients were then wet-mixed, and the resulting mixture was dried, powdered, press-molded, and sintered in an electric furnace in N.sub.2 atmosphere at 1,400.degree. to 1,650.degree. C. for 1 hour. After sintering, the thus-obtained sintered body was cut and ground to form a specimen of 4.times.8.times.25 mm. In this way, a series of specimens were produced. The phase composition and properties obtained from these specimens are shown in Table 6. In all the specimens, the mean grain size was less than 3 microns. When the sintering temperature was increased to higher temperature than those shown in Table 6, the mean grain size was larger than 3 microns, and the strength was reduced.
As is shown clearly from Table 6, the addition of TiN inhibits the transformation from the tetragonal ZrO.sub.2 to the monoclinic ZrO.sub.2 and increases the fraction of the tetragonal ZrO.sub.2, improving the strength and toughness of the resulting sintered body. The hardness and high temperature flexural strength of some specimens were also measured. The results are shown in Table 7 and FIG. 3. It can be seen from the results that the addition of TiN greatly increases the hardness and strength, and in particular, the high temperature strength is markedly improved compared with the comparative partially stabilized zirconia sintered body which is commercially available from Corning Corp., U.S.A. (Specimen No. R).
TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________Composition Stabilizer Crystal System of ZrO.sub.2 for ZrO.sub.2 Sintering Flexural Mono- Tetra-Specimen TiN Amount Temperature Density Strength K.sub.IC clinic gonal CubicNo. (wt %) Type (mol %) (.degree.C.) (g/cm.sup.3) (kg/mm.sup.2) (kg/mm.sup.3/2) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) Remarks__________________________________________________________________________T1 0.1 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 4 1,600 5.74 33.4 10.8 27 38 35 ComparisonT2 0.5 " " " 5.83 67.0 29.5 10 57 33 Present InventionT3 1.5 " " " 5.86 68.8 33.8 6 63 31 Present InventionT4 3 " 1 1,400 * -- -- 96 0 4 ComparisonT5 " " 1.5 " 5.79 33.9 19.3 44 47 9 "T6 " " 2 1,500 6.01 91.1 45.3 7 82 11 Present InventionT7 " " 2.5 " 5.99 87.1 42.4 5 76 19 Present InventionT8 " " 3 1,600 5.97 79.9 41.5 4 73 23 Present InventionT9 " " 4 " 5.91 78.2 38.7 2 64 34 Present InventionT10 " " 6 " 5.79 42.4 16.1 0 25 75 Present InventionT11 " " 8 " 5.70 29.6 15.3 0 0 100 ComparisonT12 " MgO 7 1,500 5.78 66.5 37.1 4 59 37 Present InventionT13 " CaO 6 " 5.80 61.8 35.2 5 53 42 Present InventionT14 10 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 1 " * -- -- 97 0 3 ComparisonT15 " " 2 " 5.95 94.4 43.2 6 85 9 Present InventionT16 " " 3 " 5.91 82.8 40.7 3 76 21 Present InventionT17 " " 4 " 5.86 81.0 39.1 1 70 29 Present InventionT18 " MgO 7 " 5.74 68.9 38.7 0 69 31 Present InventionT19 " CaO 6 " 5.76 64.1 37.6 0 65 35 Present InventionT20 20 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 1 " 5.91 97.1 41.4 9 88 3 Present InventionT21 " " 2 " 5.89 105.3 41.1 5 87 8 Present InventionT22 " " 3 " 5.85 90.5 39.7 0 81 19 Present InventionT23 " " 4 " 5.81 88.4 37.7 0 73 27 Present InventionT24 " MgO 7 " 5.71 75.1 36.8 0 70 30 Present InventionT25 " CaO 6 " 5.72 69.8 35.8 0 66 34 Present InventionT26 40 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 1 " 5.71 101.4 37.8 0 98 2 Present InventionT27 " " 2 " 5.69 115.3 36.9 0 94 6 Present InventionT28 " " 3 " 5.67 101.2 35.5 0 87 13 Present InventionT29 " " 4 " 5.64 98.9 33.9 0 80 20 Present InventionT30 " MgO 7 " 5.56 84.1 33.7 0 79 21 Present InventionT31 " CaO 6 " 5.57 78.2 32.4 0 74 26 Present InventionT32 60 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 1 1,600 5.59 78.4 29.7 0 98 2 Present InventionT33 " " 2 " 5.58 72.3 28.3 0 93 7 Present InventionT34 " " 3 " 5.56 62.9 27.1 0 89 11 Present InventionT35 " " 4 " 5.54 62.3 25.6 0 85 15 Present InventionT36 " MgO 7 " 5.49 52.1 23.7 0 81 19 Present InventionT37 " CaO 6 " 5.50 49.5 22.9 0 80 20 Present InventionT38 70 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 2 " 5.52 41.1 13.2 0 94 6 ComparisonT39 " MgO 7 " 5.46 39.6 12.6 0 84 16 "T40 " CaO 6 " 5.47 38.4 10.8 0 79 21 "__________________________________________________________________________ *disintegration
TABLE 7______________________________________ Specimen No. T6 T15 T21 T27 T33______________________________________Amount of TiN (wt %) 3 10 20 40 60Hardness 83.4 83.8 84.5 85.7 86.1______________________________________
EXAMPLE 4
An aqueous solution of zirconium oxychloride and an aqueous solution of yttrium chloride were mixed, co-precipitated, and calcined at 800.degree. C. to prepare a powder consisting of ZrO.sub.2 and Y.sub.2 O.sub.3. The characteristics of the powder are shown above in Table 4. To the co-precipitated powder was added TiN powder having a mean particle size of 0.1 .mu.m and a purity of 99.9% in the proportions shown in Table 8. Using the powder, a sintered body was produced in the same manner as in Example 3. The results are shown in Table 8. The high temperature strength was measured in the same manner as in Example 1, and the results are shown in FIG. 4. It can be seen from the results that even when the co-precipitated ZrO.sub.2 powder is used, the addition of TiN provides a great effect, as was the case with Example 3.
TABLE 8__________________________________________________________________________Composition Stabilizer Crystal System of ZrO.sub.2 for ZrO.sub.2 Sintering Flexural Mono- Tetra-Specimen TiN Amount Temperature Density Strength K.sub.IC clinic gonal CubicNo. (wt %) Type (mol %) (.degree.C.) (g/cm.sup.3) (kg/mm.sup.2) (kg/mm.sup.3/2) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) Remarks__________________________________________________________________________T101 20 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 2 1,500 5.95 106.9 41.5 6 89 5 Present InventionT102 " " 3 " 5.91 91.9 41.1 0 87 13 Present InventionT103 40 " 2 " 5.81 117.8 37.3 0 96 4 Present InventionT104 " " 3 " 5.78 102.7 35.9 0 89 11 Present InventionT105 60 " 2 1,600 5.68 74.4 29.6 0 97 3 Present InventionT106 " " 3 " 5.66 66.8 27.5 0 90 10 Present Invention__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 5
To a 1 mol% solution of zirconium oxychloride having a purity of 99.9% (wherein the ZrO.sub.2 component contains 3 to 5% of HfO.sub.2) were added yttrium chloride, magnesium chloride or calcium chloride as a stabilizer, all having a purity of 99.9%, and aluminum chloride having a purity of 99.9% so as to prepare a mixture having the composition shown in Table 9. They were uniformly mixed and then co-precipitated to obtain a hydroxide mixture. The hydroxide mixture thus prepared was dehydrated, dried, and calcined at 800.degree. C. to obtain a starting powder having a mean particle size of 200 .ANG.. The thus-obtained powder was press-molded at a pressure of 1.5 ton/cm.sup.2, and sintered in an electric furnace in the air at 1,400.degree. to 1,650.degree. C. for 1 hour. After sintering, the resulting sintered body was cut and ground to provide a specimen of 4.times.8.times.25 mm. In this way, a series of sintered bodies were produced. In all of the sintered bodies, the mean grain size was less than 3 microns. However, when the sintering temperature was increased to higher temperatures than those shown in Table 9, the mean grain sizes of resulting sintered bodies were larger than 3 microns, resulting in a reduction in strength.
As shown clearly from Table 9, the co-precipitation of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 inhibits the transformation from the tetragonal ZrO.sub.2 to the monoclinic ZrO.sub.2 and increases the fraction of the tetragonal ZrO.sub.2, improving the strength and toughness. The hardness and high temperature flexural strength of some specimens were also measured. The results are shown in Table 10 and FIG. 5. It can be seen from the results that the hardness of the sintered body increased with increasing Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 content, for example, the hardness of the specimen No. P34 with 60% Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 content was almost equal to that of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ceramics, and that the high temperature strength markedly improved compared with the comparative partially stabilized zirconia sintered body commercially available from Corning Corp., U.S.A. (Specimen No. R).
TABLE 9__________________________________________________________________________Composition Stabilizer Crystal System of ZrO.sub.2 for ZrO.sub.2 Sintering Flexural Mono- Tetra-Specimen Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Amount Temperature Density Strength K.sub.IC clinic gonal CubicNo. (wt %) Type (mol %) (.degree.C.) (g/cm.sup.3) (kg/mm.sup.2) (kg/mm.sup.3/2) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) Remarks__________________________________________________________________________P1 0 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 4 1,600 6.04 60.7 18.9 8 57 35 ComparisonP2 0.1 " 4 " 6.04 63.5 20.1 3 63 34 "P3 0.5 " 4 " 6.02 81.1 22.6 1 65 34 Present InventionP4 1.5 " 4 " 5.99 83.3 23.8 0 67 33 Present InventionP5 3 " 1 1,400 * -- -- 96 0 4 ComparisonP6 " " 1.5 " 5.91 41.1 18.1 41 52 7 "P7 " " 2 1,500 6.00 110.3 47.1 4 85 11 Present InventionP8 " " 2.5 " 5.99 105.5 39.7 3 79 18 Present InventionP9 " " 3 " 5.97 96.7 31.7 1 76 23 Present InventionP10 " " 4 1,600 5.95 94.6 25.0 0 68 32 Present InventionP11 " " 6 " 5.88 51.3 15.8 0 26 74 Present InventionP12 " " 8 " 5.76 35.7 13.7 0 0 100 ComparisonP13 " MgO 7 1,500 5.78 80.5 22.1 2 63 35 Present InventionP14 " CaO 6 " 5.81 74.8 20.0 3 57 40 Present InventionP15 10 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 1 " * -- -- 97 0 3 ComparisonP16 " " 2 " 5.79 117.3 41.5 2 89 9 Present InventionP17 " " 3 " 5.76 102.9 34.8 1 80 19 Present InventionP18 " " 4 1,600 5.74 100.7 32.1 0 73 27 Present InventionP19 " MgO 7 1,500 5.56 85.6 31.1 0 71 29 Present InventionP20 " CaO 6 " 5.58 79.5 29.2 0 67 33 Present InventionP21 20 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 1 " 5.52 120.6 36.6 5 93 2 Present InventionP22 " " 2 " 5.51 130.7 38.2 0 95 5 Present InventionP23 " " 3 " 5.49 112.2 33.7 0 89 11 Present InventionP24 " " 4 1,600 5.48 109.7 30.7 0 78 22 Present InventionP25 " MgO 7 1,500 5.31 93.3 29.8 0 75 25 Present InventionP26 " CaO 6 " 5.33 86.7 28.6 0 71 29 Present InventionP27 40 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 1 " 5.03 134.1 31.0 0 98 2 Present InventionP28 " " 2 " 5.03 151.6 30.1 0 96 4 Present InventionP29 " " 3 " 5.02 133.0 28.6 0 93 7 Present InventionP30 " " 4 1,600 5.01 130.1 27.4 0 86 14 Present InventionP31 " MgO 7 1,500 4.89 110.6 26.8 0 81 19 Present InventionP32 " CaO 6 " 4.90 102.8 26.2 0 79 21 Present InventionP33 60 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 1 1,600 4.63 98.9 24.2 0 100 0 Present InventionP34 " " 2 " 4.63 90.2 23.9 0 98 2 Present InventionP35 " " 3 " 4.62 78.9 23.3 0 94 6 Present InventionP36 " " 4 " 4.62 77.3 23.1 0 89 11 Present InventionP37 " MgO 7 " 4.57 65.6 22.8 0 85 15 Present InventionP38 " CaO 6 " 4.58 61.0 22.7 0 81 19 Present InventionP39 70 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 2 " 4.45 49.8 12.7 0 98 2 ComparisonP40 " MgO 7 " 4.39 48.0 11.5 0 86 14 "P41 " CaO 6 " 4.40 46.6 10.2 0 83 17 "__________________________________________________________________________ *disintegration
TABLE 10______________________________________ Specimen No. P7 P16 P22 P28 P34______________________________________Amount of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 (wt %) 3 10 20 40 60Hardness 83.6 84.2 85.1 86.7 87.8______________________________________
While the invention has been described in detail and with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.
Claims
  • 1. A method for manufacture of a high toughness sintered body, comprising:
  • (a) preparing a powder mixture containing 40-99.5 wt% of Component A consisting essentially of ZrO.sub.2 powder having an average particle diameter of no longer than 1 .mu.m and 1-6 mol% of Y.sub.2 O.sub.3, 7 mol% of MgO or 6 mol% of CaO as a stabilizer and 0.5-60 wt% of Component B consisting essentially of .alpha.-Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 powder having an average particle diameter of not longer than 1 .mu.m by uniformally mixing water soluble salts of ZrO.sub.2, stabilizer and Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 in the form of an aqueous solution and coprecipitating the powder mixture; and
  • (b) sintering the powder resulting from step (a) at temperature in the range of from 1400.degree. C. to 1600.degree. C. at atmospheric pressure to obtain a sintered body wherein at least 90% by weight of ZrO.sub.2 particles present therein are accounted for by tetragonal and cubic crystals, the ratios of said tetragonal crystals to said cubic crystals is at least 1:3, and the average crystal particle diameter of the entire sintered body is 3.mu. or less; wherein the mixed powder contains not more than 3 wt% of SiO.sub.2, not more than 0.5 wt% of Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3, not more than 0.5 wt% of TiO.sub.2 and not more than 3 wt% total of the SiO.sub.2, the Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 and the TiO.sub.2 based on the total weight of the mixed powder.
  • 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein a mixed powder obtained by substituting HfO.sub.2 for part or the whole of said ZrO.sub.2 is used in the place of said ZrO.sub.2.
Priority Claims (3)
Number Date Country Kind
56-127004 Aug 1981 JPX
56-127005 Aug 1981 JPX
56-132934 Aug 1981 JPX
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 408,086, filed Aug. 13, 1982, now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (4)
Number Name Date Kind
4218253 Dworak et al. Aug 1980
4221650 Friese et al. Sep 1980
4316964 Lange Feb 1982
4360598 Otagiri et al. Nov 1982
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Reed et al.; Ceramic Bulletin, vol. 55, p. 717 (1976).
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 408086 Aug 1982