This application claims priority to European Patent Application No. 20212122.4, filed on Dec. 7, 2020, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention relates to the manufacture of Josephson junctions, such as may be suitable for use in qubits.
Josephson junctions are the core elements of superconducting qubits, with their quality being the dominating factor of the lifetime of the qubits. Traditionally, the Josephson junctions used in superconducting qubits are fabricated using shadow evaporation: where a hollow structure is defined on a resist by lithography, allowing aluminium films deposited from different angles overlapping with each other, with an in-situ oxidation process in between, followed by lift-off. The aluminium film and the aluminium oxide layer formed in this way are typically polycrystalline, with a grain size of approximately 10 nanometers (“nm”), which is significantly smaller than the size of the junctions at approximately 100 nm.
In practice, a “macroscopic” Josephson junction is made up of many smaller “microscopic” junctions stitched together. The supercurrent density is not uniform due to the different lattice orientation and thicknesses of the aluminium oxide layers in each of the “microscopic” junctions. As a result, the critical current (and normal state resistance) of the “macroscopic” junction is difficult to control. The non-uniform tunnelling and two-level-systems arising on the grain boundaries also shorten the qubit lifetime.
According to the present invention, a method of manufacturing a Josephson junction is provided. The method comprises:
Prior to forming the stack, the method may comprise forming the first electrode layer, the dielectric layer, and the second electrode layer and etching the first electrode layer, the dielectric layer, and the second electrode layer into the shape of a superconducting quantum interference device (“SQUID”) loop. The SQUID loop shape is characterised by an elongated body which extends parallel to the substrate and includes an opening that extends perpendicular to the substrate through the first electrode layer, dielectric layer, and second electrode layer. The opening is enclosed on all sides by the first electrode layer, dielectric layer, and second electrode layer. The sides of the opening that run parallel to the longitudinal axis of the elongated body are referred to as “branches” of the SQUID loop.
The SQUID loop shape may be formed by etching the first electrode layer, the dielectric layer, and the second electrode layer via an opening in a resist.
The stack may be formed from one of the branches of the SQUID loop.
The first electrode layer, the dielectric layer, and the second electrode layer may be formed by blanket deposition using physical vapor deposition (“PVD”) or molecular beam epitaxy (“MBE”), after pre-treatment such as a hydrofluoric acid (“HF”) rinse and/or in-situ annealing of the substrate.
Forming the trench may comprise forming a first resist over the stack covering at least the upper face and side faces, creating the first opening in the first resist that exposes a portion of the upper surface of the stack, and wet or dry etching the stack to form the trench.
Forming the tunnel may comprise forming a second resist over the stack covering at least the upper face and side faces, creating the second and third openings in the second resist, the second opening exposing a portion of a first side surface of the stack, the third opening exposing a portion of a second side surface of the stack opposite to the first side surface, the third opening being the same size as the second opening and being located opposite the second opening, and wet or dry etching the stack to form the tunnel.
Alternatively, forming the tunnel may comprise creating the second and third openings in the first resist, the second opening exposing a portion of a first side surface of the stack, the third opening exposing a portion of a second side surface of the stack opposite to the first side surface, the third opening being the same size as the second opening and being located opposite the second opening, and wet or dry etching the stack to form the tunnel simultaneously with wet or dry etching the stack to form the trench.
The method may further comprise controlling etch time of the trench so that etching stops before first electrode layer is completely etched and/or controlling etch time of the trench so that etching stops before the second electrode layer is completely etched.
The first and second electrode layers may be aluminium, and the dielectric layer may be an aluminium oxide.
The aluminium oxide of the dielectric layer may have a monocrystalline structure.
The method may further comprise steps of connecting the first electrode layer and/or second electrode layer to one or more further electrical components to form a qubit.
At a first stage of the fabrication method, the end result of which is depicted in
As shown in
The substrate 1 may be a silicon wafer or any other suitable substrate. The wafer can be bare, or with superconducting films (e.g., Nb/Al/TiN etc.) patterned with elements based on a coplanar waveguide. The first electrode layer 2 and the second electrode layer 4 are preferably formed of aluminium and the dielectric layer 3 is preferably formed of an aluminium oxide AlxOy, for example Al2O3. This selection of materials may be referred to as an Al/AlxOy/Al trilayer. Methods for producing monocrystalline aluminium oxide dielectric layers using in-situ annealing or oxidation are known in the art, for example as described in Fritz et al., “Optimization of Al/AlOx/Al-layer systems for Josephson junctions from a microstructure point of view”, Journal of Applied Physics 125, 165301 (2019).
In an alternative embodiment, the Al/AlxOy/Al trilayer 2, 3, 4 is formed by physical vapor deposition (“PVD”), such as sputtering or electron beam evaporation and molecular beam epitaxy (“MBE”), after necessary pre-treatment such as a HF rinse and/or in-situ annealing of the substrate.
However, the process for producing high-quality monocrystalline Al/AlxOy/Al trilayers using in-situ annealing requires high temperatures in order to form the trilayer, which prevents the use of shadow evaporation to form the structure of the Josephson junction. Furthermore, MBE is also incompatible with shadow evaporation as the resists used in shadow evaporation contaminate the MBE chamber.
The method of the present invention enables the structures of the Josephson junction to be formed from an Al/AlxOy/Al trilayer formed by blanket deposition, thereby providing a Josephson junction with superior properties provided by the high-quality monocrystalline trilayer, such as improved critical current control, uniform tunnelling and reduced occurrence of two-level systems within the Josephson junction. However, the method of fabricating the Josephson junction does not require that these specific materials be used for the trilayer, thus other materials may be used for the first electrode layer 2, the second electrode layer 4, and insulating layer as long as the materials chosen are capable of forming a Josephson junction.
After the first electrode layer 2, the dielectric layer 3, and second electrode layer 4 have been formed, they are patterned by wet/dry etching to form the stack shown in
As shown in
Alternatively to the separate resists 5 and 6 shown in
After etching to form the shape of the stack 2, 3, 4, the resist 7 is removed, leaving the shape depicted in
Where the Josephson junction shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20212122 | Dec 2020 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20190296214 | Yoscovits et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190363239 | Yoscovits et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200365397 | Megrant | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20220181535 | Holmes | Jun 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
107016442 | Aug 2017 | CN |
2000216447 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2002246665 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2011233825 | Nov 2011 | JP |
2018030977 | Feb 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wang et al., “Three-dimensional arrays of BiSrCaCuo-2212 intrinsic Josephson junctions and zero-crossing Shapiro steps at 760 GHz”, Applied Physics Letters, A I P Publishing LLC, US, vol. 80, No. 9, Mar. 4, 2002 (Mar. 4, 2002) pp. 1604-1606, XP012031720, ISSN: 0003-6951, DOI: 10.1063/1.1456555 (Year: 2002). |
Kim et al., “New approach for fabricating submicron scale intrinsic Josephson junctions using high-T'c superconducting materials” Physica C, North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 362, No. 1-4, Sep. 1, 2001 (Sep. 1, 2001), pp. 150-155, XP003319540, ISSN: 0921-4534, DOI: 10.1016/S0921-4534 (Year: 2001). |
European Search Report issued to EP Application No. 20212122.4, dated May 19, 2021, 3 pages. |
Shuuichi et al. “Vortex Penetrations in Parallel-connected two Stacks of Intrinsic Josephson Junctions”, Physics Procedia, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 81, May 10, 2016, pp. 85-88, XP029532518, ISSN: 1875-3892, DOI: 10.1016/J. PHPRO.2016.04.033, *p. 86, line 19-87, line 5; figure 1*. |
Kim et al., “New approach for fabricating submicron scale intrinsic Josephson junctions using high-T'c superconducting materials” Physica C, North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 362, No. 1-4, Sep. 1, 2001 (Sep. 1, 2001), pp. 150-155, XP003319540, ISSN: 0921-4534, DOI: 10 1016/S0921-4534 (01) 99662-1, *p. 151, left-handed column, line 15—p. 152, left-handed column, line 23; figures 1, 2*. |
Kawae et al., “Influence of charging energy on cooper pair tunneling in Bi-2212 small intrinsic Josephson junctions”, IEEE Transactions in Applied Superconductivity, IEEE Service Center, Los Alamitos, CA, US vol. 13, No. 2, Jun. 1, 2003 (Jun. 1, 2003), pp. 897-900, XP011097921, ISSN: 1051-8223, DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2003.814074 *figure 1*. |
Wang et al., “Three-dimensional arrays of BiSrCaCuo-2212 intrinsic Josephson junctions and zero-crossing Shapiro steps at 760 GHz”, Applied Physics Letters, A I P Publishing LLC, US, vol. 80, No. 9, Mar. 4, 2002 (Mar. 4, 2002) pp. 1604-1606, XP012031720, ISSN: 0003-6951, DOI: 10.1063/1.1456555 *p. 1604, right-hand column, line 22—p. 1605, left-handed column, line 35; figures 1, 2*. |
Hatano et al., “A4-bit, 250-MIPS processor using Josephson technology”, IEEE Micro, IEEE Service Center, Los Alamitos, CA, US, vol. 10, No. 2, Apr. 1, 1990 (Apr. 1, 1990), pp. 40-55, XP011417466, ISSN: 0272-1732 DOI: 10.1109/40.52946 *figure 1*. |
Shuuichi et al., “Size Dependence of Individual Vortex Penetration into Intrinsic Josephson Junction Stacks of Bi2Sr2CaCu208+y”, Physics Procedia, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 65, Jun. 20, 2015 (Jun. 20, 2015), pp. 109-112, XP029178295, ISSN: 1875-3892, DOI: 10.1016/J.PHPRO.2015.05.146 *p. 110, line 7-line 17; figure 1*. |
Taiwanese Search Report issued in related Application No. 110142395, dated Nov. 15, 2022, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220181538 A1 | Jun 2022 | US |