One way to compute the phase shift between the nasal and thoracic flows is to first scale the nasal flow waveform so that its peak-to-peak magnitude is equal to the peak-to-peak magnitude of the thoracic flow. Then calculate a new waveform (scaled difference) by subtracting the scaled nasal flow from the thoracic flow. The time delay between the two flow signals can be measured by integrating a small region (small compared to a respiratory cycle, say 10% or less) on the scaled difference waveform, and dividing that result by the differences in thoracic flow from the start to the end of that integrated region. From the time delay, it is a simple matter to compute the phase shift. In summary, the scaled difference can be used to measure phase shift.
A phase shift can be calculated within almost any region of a single breath as long as the starting and ending flows are not equal. (If the starting and ending flows are the same, then the quotient will have a zero in the denominator.) However, some regions are better than others for practical computational reasons. For example, because a computer can represent a flow value along the signal with a specific finite number resolution, it is desirable that the starting and ending flow are as far apart as possible. This reason can also be applied to computing the difference between the nasal and thoracic flows. Assuming the phase shift is uniform, the difference between the nasal and thoracic flow is greatest where the slope of the flow signals is steepest.
As a result, the two best regions to measure the phase shift are regions surrounding the transition from inspiration-to-expiration and from expiration-to-inspiration. And since the subject may hesitate at the end of expiration, the transition from inspiration-to-expiration is best.
Since the Box Flow signal is the difference between the nasal and thoracic flows, it responds to changes in phase shift. And since it is the unscaled difference between the nasal and thoracic flows, it responds to amplitude difference between nasal and thoracic flows. A peak may be expected at the transition from inspiration-to-expiration due to the phase shift between the nasal and thoracic flows. We can also see a similar, but opposite-going peak at the transition from expiration-to-inspiration.
As described above, resistance information is readily available on the Box Flow signal at the transition from inspiration-to-expiration and from expiration-to-inspiration. This information is manifested by a peak surrounding that transition region. The area under this peak can be shown to be related to the developed pressure within the lung required to move the air either in or out. Also, the area under this peak is similar to the area computed between the nasal and thoracic waveforms in the double chamber application, which is an element in the computation of specific airway resistance. While not being purely related to resistance, or lung pressure, this peak is at least sensitively responsive to airway resistance.
In order to calculate the index of airway resistance (Ipr) as a measurement of airway resistance from the peaks in graph (B) of
The area during inspiration (A2) is measured immediately before the zero crossing. The area during expiration (A3) is measured after the Box Flow negative peak (A1). Specifically, A3 begins Tp past A1. The index of airway resistance is then measured in accordance with the following equation:
Peak information can also be used to estimate functional resistance capacity (FRC). To estimate the subject's FRC, we start with the following equation, and simplify it:
Making all these assumptions, if we integrate the peaks that occur, then we can estimate FRC as follows:
W is the ratio of the area peak under each peak. The value can be easily derived from the box flow signal. And as shown above, this ratio is related to the ratio of the subject's pulmonary volume at the start of inspiration to the pulmonary volume at the end of inspiration.
With an estimation of VT (tidal volume), FRC can be estimated by the following:
It is known from A Noninvasive Technique For Measurement Of Changes In Specific Airway Resistance, Pennock et al., J. Appl. Physiol.: Respirat. Environ. Exercise Physiol. 46(2): 399-406, (1979), that the following relationship is true:
tan θ=2πfRawC
where:
If the expansion or contraction is isothermal (and it is because it takes place at subject's body temperature), then the following relationship is true:
where:
θ=2πfd
where:
The thoracic gas volume (Vtgv) is different at the start of inspiration than it is at the end of inspiration. And this difference can easily be measured by integrating the thoracic flow signal. This value is routinely reported as the tidal volume (VT).
Knowing these two equations, an equation can be derived both for FRC and Raw.
To simplify the following derivations, substitute the tangent terms as follows:
Certain modifications and improvements will occur to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the foregoing description. It should be understood that all such modifications and improvements have been deleted herein for the sake of conciseness and readability but are properly within the scope of the following claims.