The disclosure relates to a method for individual modification of a turbocompressor for the purpose of matching to specific constraints during operation. The method can be used in particular for multistage axial turbocompressors. The disclosure also relates to components of a turbocompressor which are modified with the aid of the stated method, and to a turbocompressor, as well as to a gas turbine set, which have a turbocompressor such as this.
Compressors in gas turbine sets and in particular air-breathing gas turbine sets have to ensure stable operation over a very wide operating range. This is due on the one hand to the broad spectrum of the environmental conditions. On the other hand, in the case of single-shaft gas turbine sets which are used for electricity generation, it is not possible to control the operating state of the compressor independently via the rotation speed. In contrast, machines which are used in low-power networks, such as those which typically occur in third-world countries, have to run with predetermined large fluctuations in the frequency and thus in the rotation speed resulting from the network, and frequently at a less than normal rotation speed, which makes the stability poorer. Furthermore, the ageing, the wear and the dirt on the compressor blades over the life of a compressor can also lead to a deterioration in the stability behavior. In the case of installations in which poor constraints such as these occur relatively frequently and accumulate, it is frequently desirable to modify the compressor in a gas turbine set that is provided per se, in such a way that it has better stability against flow separation.
When designing gas turbine sets, the compressor must be able to operate with very high efficiency levels. However, this can result in the compressor being operated close to the stability limit in extreme conditions, for example in the case of relatively low compressor inlet temperatures, which intrinsically improve the stability, as a result of the rising pressure ratio that is predetermined by the turbine, or else in very high compressor inlet temperatures resulting in the operating point of the compressor being shifted to a range which is now stable only conditionally. The stability margin may then no longer be sufficient to cover further disadvantageous influencing variables mentioned above.
For various reasons, it is obviously impracticable and in many cases too complex to completely match the compressors of gas turbine sets for specific constraints such as these. On the one hand, a completely new design of the blade section geometry for specific cases is uneconomic. On the other hand, it is virtually intrinsically impossible for individual installations to deviate from the standard rotor and/or stator geometry. Furthermore, the stability limit is frequently relevant only when an increase in power, and hence also in general an increase in the pressure ratio, is implemented during the course of a life of a gas turbine set, owing to improvements in the operating concept or in the turbine.
One situation which also occurs in the case of other compressor installations, for example in the case of industrial compressors, is that the margin from flow separation is no longer adequate as a result of changes in the operating regime. According to the prior art, this requires complete replacement of the compressor or highly complex modifications, which also require subsequent machining, which generally cannot be carried out in situ, of rotor and/or stator parts, or even their replacement.
In order to improve the flow stability of a turbomachine, in terms of the oscillatory response, U.S. Pat. No. 6,379,112 discloses the technical teaching of taking precautions in the design of the machine against the risk of oscillations in the blade cascade in that a row of blades, irrespective of whether this is a row of rotor blades in the rotor or a row of stator blades in the stator, is split over its circumference into different segments, e.g., into four quadrants, with a different number of blades being installed within each of these segments. Because of the changing blade separations over the circumference, the blades in the respective subsequent row of blades moving past are excited at continuously changing frequencies, thus reducing their tendency to oscillate. A refinement such as this to areas which are at risk of oscillation within the blade cascade is intended to reduce the overall tendency to oscillate. However, this document provides no stimuli with regard to the problem explained in the introduction of matching the turbomachine to specific constraints of operation at the boundary of the stability limit.
A method is disclosed which, on the basis of one of many aspects, allows the operating behavior of a turbocompressor to be matched to specific constraints and, in particular, allows the flow stability of the turbocompressor to be improved, without having to carry out modifications to the rotor shaft or to the casing. According to a further exemplary aspect, it is likewise intended to be possible to improve the flow stability of the turbocompressor without having to configure and verify new blade section geometries.
The disclosure makes it possible to vary the separation ratio of an axial blade cascade without having to modify the geometry of the blade sections, and in particular without having to modify components such as the rotor shaft or the casing.
The separation ratio of the blade cascade in an axial row of blades or in a blade ring is defined as the mutual offset between two blade sections in the circumferential direction, with respect to the chord length of a blade section.
It is known that an optimum separation ratio exists, as a function of the cascade load characteristic variable of the blade cascade, at which the losses are minimized. Deviations from this optimum separation ratio lead to a rapid rise in the cascade losses. Modern turbocompressors are configured to operate in the region of this optimum separation ratio. Within the scope of the invention, it has now been found that a reduction to the separation ratio of an existing compressor makes it possible to improve the flow stability within the compressor. However, this change represents major intervention in the cascade geometry of an axial row of blades. It has also been found that a modification which would increase the losses of an entire range of compressors as a result of stability problems in extreme operating conditions should be avoided. It has also been found that interventions in the blade section geometry are in their own right intrinsically complex and frequently necessitate major design changes or conversions to the rotor shaft and/or to the casing.
A method for improving the flow stability of a turbocompressor is thus specified, in which the number of blades arranged in a row of blades or in a blade ring in an axial blade cascade is increased. This reduces the distance between the two blade sections, and the separation ratio is also reduced without any modification to the blade section geometry, that is to say shifting to admittedly greater cascade losses but also to better stability.
The proposed method can be implemented in a particularly simple form if the blade feet of the blades which are arranged in a blade ring are arranged in a groove, which runs in the circumferential direction, in a rotor shaft or in a casing.
According to one exemplary embodiment of the method, at least one spacer which is arranged in the circumferential direction between two blade feet of the blade ring is removed, and at least one additional blade is inserted in its place. In a further exemplary embodiment, at least one spacer which is arranged between two blade feet in the blade ring is replaced by a spacer with a smaller circumferential extent, and at least one additional blade is installed. In another development in the method, at least one existing spacer is removed and is machined in such a way that the circumferential extent of the spacer is reduced; the spacer which has been modified in this way is installed again, and at least one additional blade is inserted into the blade ring. One obvious advantage in this case, in which only spacers have to be replaced and/or machined, is that the blades which are loaded both aerodynamically and by centrifugal forces do not need to be modified in their particularly heavily loaded foot area. In general, this modification is based solely on the replacement or the omission, or possibly remachining, of components which are comparatively easy to handle from the production point of view. This type of modification to blade rings, in which spacers are arranged between blade feet in the circumferential direction, is thus particularly economic.
One exemplary method, which can be used alternatively or cumulatively, is distinguished by the replacement of at least one existing blade by a blade whose blade foot has a smaller circumferential extent, and the insertion of at least one additional blade into the blade ring. This method may also include the removal of an existing blade and the machining of its blade foot in such a way that the circumferential extent of the blade foot is reduced. Following the modification of the blade foot, the blade is installed again, together with an additional blade.
In developments of the exemplary methods described above, blades whose blade section has the same chord length and in particular the same blade section geometry as the originally installed blades are used as additional blades and/or possibly as replacement blades to be installed. In particular, in one specific development of the method, identical blades are installed as additional blades with the originally installed blades. A modification of the blade foot may also be carried out to these intrinsically identical blades to be installed additionally, with the circumferential extent of the blade foot being reduced in comparison to the original state. This means that the only cascade characteristic variable which has changed is the separation ratio. This keeps the effort that is required for the modification low since, depending on the specific situation, it may not be necessary to replace all of the blades in the modified blade ring, and there is no need to reconfigure the blade section geometry. Furthermore, the effects on the flow conditions at the blade boundary which is arranged downstream remain minimal. In one exemplary embodiment of the method, after the conversion work, blades with an identical chord length of the blade section and in particular with an identical blade section geometry are arranged throughout the entire blade ring.
One major advantage of the exemplary method described here is that compressors can be modified individually and in situ in order to be matched to specific constraints during operation without any need for modifications to large components, which can be handled only with difficulty, such as the rotor shaft and/or the casing. The method can be carried out in such a way that only standard production components are required for this purpose, with modifications which can be carried out easily, such as milling off the blade foot, which can be carried out easily. Furthermore, it is not necessarily essential to replace all of the blades in the blade ring, and it may be sufficient to supply the blades that are additionally to be installed as new, thus considerably simplifying the logistics, particularly in the case of installations in regions where access is difficult.
The described exemplary method makes it possible to overcome stability problems in compressors, which are observed as a result of the occurrence of poor operating states and/or ageing and/or wear phenomena, with comparatively little effort.
The exemplary method described above also makes it possible to optimize turbocompressors for normal use, since the described method makes it possible to very easily modify a compressor which is intended for unusual and extreme operating conditions to have a more stable operating behavior.
The specific embodiments of the exemplary methods as described above may, of course, be combined with one another.
The exemplary method can be suitable for modification of at least one row of blades in the rotor and/or the stator of a turbocompressor. In particular, the method is suitable for modification of a turbocompressor in a gas turbine set. The disclosure to this extent also covers a rotor for a turbocompressor and/or a stator for a turbocompressor having at least one row of blades, which are modified in accordance with the method described above. It also covers a turbocompressor which has a rotor and/or stator that has been modified by means of the method.
Further exemplary embodiments and applications of the disclosure will be evident to a person skilled in the art on the basis of the statements that have been made above and of the exemplary embodiment that is described in the following text, as well as from the patent claims.
The invention will be explained in more detail in the following text with reference to one exemplary embodiment, which is illustrated in the drawing, in which, in detail:
Details that are not significant to the invention have been omitted. The exemplary embodiments and the drawing are intended to assist understanding of the method specified here and should not be used to restrict the invention described in the claims.
The detailed arrangement of blade feet 231 and spacers 24 in the circumferential groove and of the blade sections 232 can be seen in the development illustrated in
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the third rotor row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 41 to 45.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the fourth rotor row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 41 to 45.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the fifth rotor row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 41 to 45.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 6th rotor row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 51 to 57.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 7th rotor row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 51 to 57.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 8th rotor row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 51 to 57.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 9th rotor row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 65 to 71.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 10th rotor row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 65 to 71.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 11th rotor row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 65 to 71.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 12th rotor row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 65 to 71.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 13th rotor row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 65 to 71.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 14th rotor row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 83 to 91.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 15th rotor row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 83 to 91.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 16th rotor row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 83 to 91.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 17th rotor row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 83 to 91.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises increasing the number of blades in the first stator row of an axial turbocompressor from 34 to 38. In this case, the first stator row is not the same as a row of inlet guide vanes; the first stator row means the stator blade row which is arranged immediately downstream from the first rotor blade row.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the second stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 46 to 50.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the third stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 52 to 54.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the fourth stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 52 to 54.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the fifth stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 60 to 64.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the sixth stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 56 to 62.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 7th stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 52 to 58.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 8th stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 66 to 72.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 9th stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 66 to 72.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 10th stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 66 to 72.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 11th stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 66 to 72.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 12th stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 66 to 72.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 13th stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 84 to 92.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 14th stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 84 to 92.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 15th stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 84 to 92.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 16th stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 84 to 92.
One exemplary embodiment of the method comprises the number of blades in the 17th stator row in an axial turbocompressor being increased from 84 to 92.
In the case of these modifications, the blade section geometry in each case can remain unchanged. In a further exemplary embodiment, the original installed blades are reused, and additional blades are newly installed.
The exemplary embodiments described above may be combined with one another. In one exemplary embodiment, all of the rotor and stator blade rows in a compressor are modified as stated above, while the number of blades in the first two rows of rotor blades is kept constant. This then results in a compressor modification as indicated in the table in
In light of the statements made above and the patent claims, the way in which the method for modification of other compressors is carried out will be obvious to those skilled in the art.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the present invention can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The presently disclosed exemplary embodiments are therefore considered in all respects to be illustrative and not restricted. The scope of the invention is indicated by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description and all changes that come within the meaning and range and equivalence thereof are intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04106808.1 | Dec 2004 | EP | regional |
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to EP Application 04106808.1 filed in Europe on Dec. 21, 2004, and as a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. §120 to PCT/EP2005/056294 filed as an International Application on Nov. 29, 2005, designating the U.S., the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP05/56294 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 11812029 | Jun 2007 | US |