The present invention relates to a method for monitoring a gear-change operation in a motor vehicle provided with an engine whose crankshaft is connected to a transmission having a gearbox comprising first and second primary shafts connectable to the crankshaft of the engine by respective friction clutches controlled by corresponding actuators, and a secondary or output shaft connectable to the primary shafts by gears defining a plurality of velocity ratios or gears.
The method according to the invention essentially comprises the operation of verifying and validating the detection of the disengagement of a previously engaged gear by detecting the angular velocity of the primary shaft corresponding to said gear to be disengaged, and comparing the detected value of said angular velocity with at least one reference angular velocity.
Other features and advantages of the invention will be found in the following detailed description, which is given purely by way of non-limiting example with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
In
The engine E is associated with a moment of inertia JE.
The crankshaft ES of the engine E is connected to a transmission denoted by the general reference T.
The transmission T comprises a gearbox with first and second primary shafts S1 and S2, which are connectable to the crankshaft ES of the engine E by respective friction clutches FC1 and FC2 controlled by corresponding actuators A1 and A2, which may for example be electrically controlled actuators.
The gearbox GS also comprises a secondary or output shaft SS connectable to the primary shafts S1 and S2 by gears G1, G2 defining a plurality of velocity ratios or gears. In the simplified schematic view of
In operation, the clutches A1 and A2 are each capable of transmitting respective torques to the associated primary shafts S1 and S2.
This invention provides a method for monitoring a gear-change operation. In view of the following description, with reference to
In
ωp,dis and ωp,inn are the angular velocities of the two primary shafts S1 and S2, respectively.
tdis and tinn are the transmission ratios produced by gears G1 and G2, respectively, in the branches of the transmission T where the gear-change operation requires disengaging the previously engaged gear, and engaging the new gear, respectively.
ωs is the angular velocity of the secondary shaft SS.
When monitoring a change of gear it is important to detect the disengagement of the previously engaged gear. This can easily be done by analysing the signals supplied by sensors measuring the positions of the gears of the synchronizers of the transmission T.
The detection of the disengagement of the previously engaged gear is, in the method of the invention, conveniently verified and validated in one of the various ways described below.
In general terms, the verification and validation of the detection of the disengagement of the previously engaged gear are based on detecting the angular velocity ωp,dis of the primary shaft (S1 in the example shown in
In a first embodiment, the angular velocity ωp,dis of the primary shaft (S1) corresponding to the gear to be disengaged is compared with a reference velocity corresponding to the angular velocity ωs of the secondary shaft SS multiplied by the transmission ratio tdis of this primary shaft S1 to the secondary shaft, corresponding to the gear to be disengaged. The disengagement of the gear is confirmed when the difference between the velocity ωp,dis of the primary shaft and said reference velocity ωstdis has an absolute value greater than a predetermined value.
Referring to the top curve in
The velocity ωp,dis can be measured by a known type of sensor such as a phonic wheel. Similarly, the velocity ωs of the secondary shaft can also be detected by a sensor, or can be calculated from the measured angular velocities of the driving wheels, taking into account the transmission ratio at the axle.
The verification used in the first embodiment described above is advantageously done by suitably taking into consideration the value of the torque CF,dis transmitted by the clutch (FC1) connected to the velocity ratio or gear to be disengaged.
In a second embodiment, the angular velocity ωp,dis of the primary shaft corresponding to the gear to be disengaged is compared with a reference velocity corresponding to the angular velocity ωE of the crankshaft ES of the engine E. The disengagement of the previously engaged gear is confirmed when the velocity ωp,dis is equal to this reference velocity, and the torque CF,dis transmitted by the clutch (FC1) connected to the gear to be disengaged is greater than a predetermined threshold value.
In another embodiment shown in the illustrative schematic,
As an example, the reference velocity ωref1 may be equal to the product of the velocity ωs of the secondary shaft SS and the transmission ratio tdis corresponding to the gear to be disengaged, while the reference velocity ωref2 may be equal to the angular velocity ωE of the crankshaft ES of the engine E.
The velocity ωp,dis of the primary shaft corresponding to the gear to be disengaged is compared, in a logical evaluation unit EB, with the reference velocities ωref1 and ωref2. The disengagement of the previously engaged gear is confirmed when the angular velocity ωp,dis satisfies a condition of predetermined congruency relative to the reference velocities ωref1 and ωref2.
The solutions described above for verifying and validating the disengagement of the “old” gear are based on the fact that the friction clutch connected to the gear to be disengaged is brought partially into contact, producing an advantageous action on completion of the gear-change operation. The reason for this is that the partial contact or partial closure of the friction clutch on the branch of the transmission T containing the gear to be disengaged, helps to synchronize, immediately after disengagement of the “old” gear, the angular velocity of the crankshaft of the engine E with that of the primary shaft of the gear to be disengaged, and thus obviates the need to perform this synchronization at the end of the operation.
Synchronizing the velocity ωE of the crankshaft of the engine E with that of the primary shaft of the gear to be disengaged also facilitates operations in which two gear changes are required in succession. In such operations, if ωE and the angular velocity of the primary shaft of the gear to be disengaged are not synchronized at the end of the first gear change, the second gear change request would have to be dealt with by making said primary shaft perform a greater velocity jump, which would increase the load on the associated synchronizer.
Naturally, without departing from the principle of the invention, the embodiments and details of construction may differ substantially from those described and illustrated purely by way of non-limiting example, without thereby departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08425383 | May 2008 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5804711 | Remboski et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5947862 | Knapp et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
20080210181 | Nakamura | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090183559 | Birk et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090216413 | Baldet et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 857 895 | Aug 1998 | EP |
1 271 005 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 887 261 | Feb 2008 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090299584 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |