The present application is a 371 of International application PCT/EP2017/001342, filed Nov. 16, 2017, which claims priority of DE 10 2017 001 904.5, filed Feb. 28, 2017, the priority of these applications is hereby claimed and these applications are incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a method for monitoring crankcase pressure.
DE 10 2013 021 295 B3 discloses a method for monitoring crankcase pressure, in which in a first feature a crankcase pressure monitoring is carried out on the basis of a limit curve. The limit curve is calculated according to the target crankcase pressure and an offset value. If the current actual-crankcase pressure exceeds the value of the limit curve, a safety-critical error is displayed to the operator of the internal combustion engine. A second feature includes updating the target crankcase pressure on the basis of a learning curve. The learning curve is determined from an average value of target crankcase pressure values, the deviation thereof from the actual crankcase pressure, and a weighting factor. The learning curve is then used to update the target crankcase pressure accordingly.
A crankcase ventilation is implemented as a closed circuit. In this case, the blow-by is extracted from the crankcase by suction, de-oiled and fed back to the fresh-air side, for example upstream of an exhaust turbocharger. Typically, an air filter is arranged in the air path of the internal combustion engine, the airflow rate of which deteriorates during operation. The method described in DE 10 2013 021 295 B3 responds to a deteriorating air infeed via the updating of the learning curve and the limit curve. In practice, it has now been shown that a replacement of the air filter may lead to an unexpected fault display.
The object of the invention is therefore to improve the method known from the prior art.
The innovation lies in the fact that after the engine is started and steady-state operation of the internal combustion engine is detected, the actual crankcase pressure is compared with a limit value. If limit values are exceeded, the measure taken is that the learning curve, and as a result the limit curve, are reset to their initial values. After the learning curve and the limit curve have been reset, the method switches into the crankcase pressure monitoring mode proper, as is disclosed in DE 10 2013 021 295 B3. A steady-state operation occurs when the engine speed and the engine torque are constant. An advantageous feature is that an air filter change is detected by the method with complete certainty, and therefore unwanted error messages are eliminated. The method according to the invention offers the operator of the internal combustion engine the advantage that he/she can perform an air filter change him/herself, i.e. without the engine manufacturer's service technician, and nevertheless continue to use the internal combustion engine with its full functionality.
The initial value to which the learning curve or the limit curve is set corresponds to the original value in the new condition of the internal combustion engine. In other words, the characteristic curves/characteristic maps are re-populated with the original data. In one alternative it is provided that the initial value is set to a corrected original value, the original value being corrected on the basis of the load profile of the internal combustion engine or the operating lifetime of the internal combustion engine. Typically, the load profile is determined as a function of the engine speed and the engine torque, for example on the basis of the DIN-classification procedures.
To increase the process reliability it is provided that the actual crankcase pressure is compared with a limit value only within a specifiable time. After this time has elapsed, a changeover is immediately made into the crankcase pressure monitoring mode proper.
A preferred exemplary embodiment is shown in the figures. Shown are:
In the following, it is assumed that the actual crankcase pressure pKG(IST) changes to lower pressure values. This trajectory is caused by a clogging air filter, i.e., the air volume flow decreases. Due to the previously described dependency, both the learning curve LK and the limit curve GK follow the curve of the actual crankcase pressure pKG(IST). Before a time t1, the internal combustion engine is disabled and the last value of the learning curve LK is stored in the engine electronic control unit.
The internal combustion engine is then restarted, thus after completion of the starting procedure it is necessary to wait until a steady-state operating state is detected. In the case of an emergency generator a steady-state operating state exists when the internal combustion engine has reached its stable target speed, for example 1500 rpm, corresponding to 50 Hz. The steady-state operating condition is detected at time t1. The invention then provides that, after the expiry of a time step at time t1, it is checked whether the actual crankcase pressure actual pKG(IST) is greater than a limit value dpKG. In the curve shown in
In an alternative embodiment it is provided that the learning curve LK and the limit curve GK are set to corrected original values. For example, the correction is calculated on the basis of the load profile of the internal combustion engine or the operating lifetime of the internal combustion engine. Typically, the load profile is determined as a function of the engine speed and the engine torque, for example via the dwell time in the appropriate speed and engine torque classes. In this embodiment, the learning curve LK is then corrected to a smaller value of the crankcase pressure at time t1. In
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2017 001 904.5 | Feb 2017 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/001342 | 11/16/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/157907 | 9/7/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4644920 | Abe | Feb 1987 | A |
5792949 | Hewelt | Aug 1998 | A |
6240772 | Thomas | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6546321 | Ohkubo | Apr 2003 | B1 |
8555831 | Paa | Oct 2013 | B2 |
9909470 | Christian | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10221797 | Hönl | Mar 2019 | B2 |
20020139331 | Takahashi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20050022795 | Beyer | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20100170474 | Yamaguchi | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20130228006 | Kuhn | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140076249 | Rollinger | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140081549 | Rollinger | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140081550 | Jentz | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140081551 | Rollinger | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140081564 | Pursifull | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150247471 | Hamamoto | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160097354 | Martus | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160097355 | Jentz | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160319762 | Honl | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170175662 | Yoshioka | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180283976 | Shiwa | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190226368 | Hofmann | Jul 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101907026 | Dec 2010 | CN |
102966409 | Mar 2013 | CN |
203962158 | Nov 2014 | CN |
106030059 | Oct 2016 | CN |
106065798 | Nov 2016 | CN |
102013021295 | May 2015 | DE |
102013224030 D4 | May 2015 | DE |
102014114397 | Apr 2016 | DE |
1921300 | May 2008 | EP |
2008099276 | Aug 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200109676 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |