Ultrasound medical systems and methods include ultrasound imaging of anatomical tissue to identify tissue for medical treatment. Ultrasound may also be used to medically treat and destroy unwanted tissue by heating the tissue. Imaging is done using low-intensity ultrasound waves, while medical treatment is performed with high-intensity ultrasound waves. High-intensity ultrasound waves, when focused at a focal zone a distance away from the ultrasound source, will substantially medically affect tissue in the focal zone. However, the high-intensity ultrasound will not substantially affect patient tissue outside the focal zone, such as tissue located between the ultrasound source and the focal zone. Other treatment regimes of interest include unfocused high-intensity ultrasound, wherein the ultrasound energy is distributed over a relatively broad region of tissue rather than being generally concentrated within a focal zone.
Ultrasound waves may be emitted and received by a transducer assembly. The transducer assembly may include a single element, or an array of elements acting together, to image the anatomical tissue and to ultrasonically ablate identified tissue. Transducer elements may employ a concave shape or an acoustic lens to focus ultrasound energy. Transducer arrays may include planar, concave or convex elements to focus or otherwise direct ultrasound energy. Further, such array elements may be electronically or mechanically controlled to steer and focus the ultrasound waves emitted by the array to a focal zone to provide three-dimensional medical ultrasound treatment of anatomical tissue. In some treatments the transducer is placed on the surface of the tissue for imaging and/or treatment of areas within the tissue. In other treatments the transducer is surrounded with a balloon which is expanded to contact the surface of the tissue by filling the balloon with a fluid such as a saline solution to provide acoustic coupling between the transducer and the tissue.
Examples of ultrasound medical systems and methods include: deploying an end effector having an ultrasound transducer outside the body to break up kidney stones inside the body; endoscopically inserting an end effector having an ultrasound transducer into the rectum to medically destroy prostate cancer; laparoscopically inserting an end effector having an ultrasound transducer into the abdominal cavity to destroy a cancerous liver tumor; intravenously inserting a catheter end effector having an ultrasound transducer into a vein in the arm and moving the catheter to the heart to medically destroy diseased heart tissue; and interstitially inserting a needle end effector having an ultrasound transducer into the tongue to medically destroy tissue to reduce tongue volume as a treatment for snoring. Methods for guiding an end effector to the target tissue include x-rays, Magnetic Resonance Images (“MRI”) and images produced using the ultrasound transducer itself.
Low-intensity ultrasound energy may be applied to unexposed anatomical tissue for the purpose of examining the tissue. Ultrasound pulses are emitted, and returning echoes are measured to determine the characteristics of the unexposed tissue. Variations in tissue structure and tissue boundaries have varying acoustic impedances, resulting in variations in the strength of ultrasound echoes. A common ultrasound imaging technique is known in the art as “B-Mode” wherein either a single ultrasound transducer is articulated or an array of ultrasound transducers is moved or electronically scanned to generate a two-dimensional image of an area of tissue. The generated image is comprised of a plurality of pixels, each pixel corresponding to a portion of the tissue area being examined. The varying strength of the echoes is preferably translated to a proportional pixel brightness. A cathode ray tube or liquid crystal display can be used to display a two-dimensional pixellated image of the tissue area being examined varying strength of the echoes is preferably translated to a proportional pixel brightness. A cathode ray tube or liquid crystal display can be used to display a two-dimensional pixellated image of the tissue area being examined.
When high-intensity ultrasound energy is applied to anatomical tissue, significant beneficial physiological effects may be produced in the tissue. For example, undesired anatomical tissue may be ablated by heating the tissue with high-intensity ultrasound energy. By focusing the ultrasound energy at one or more specific focusing zones within the tissue, thermal effects can be confined to a defined region that may be remote from the ultrasound transducer. The use of high-intensity focused ultrasound to ablate tissue presents many advantages, including: reduced patient trauma and pain; potentially reduced patient recovery time; elimination of the need for some surgical incisions and stitches; reduced or obviated need for general anesthesia; reduced exposure of non-targeted internal tissue; reduced risk of infection and other complications; avoidance of damage to non-targeted tissue; avoidance of harmful cumulative effects from the ultrasound energy on the surrounding non-target tissue; reduced treatment costs; minimal blood loss; and the ability for ultrasound treatments to be performed at non-hospital sites and/or on an out-patient basis.
Ultrasound treatment of anatomical tissue may involve the alternating use of both low-intensity imaging ultrasound and high-intensity treatment ultrasound. During such treatment, imaging is first performed to identify and locate the tissue to be treated. The identified tissue is then medically treated with high-intensity ultrasound energy for the purpose of ablating the tissue. After a period of exposure to high-intensity ultrasound, a subsequent image of the tissue is generated using low-intensity ultrasound energy to determine the results of the ultrasound treatment and provide visual guidance to the user to aid in subsequent treatments. This process of applying low-energy ultrasound to assist in guiding the position and focal point of the transducer, followed by high-energy ultrasound to ablate the undesired anatomical tissue, may continue until the undesired tissue has been completely ablated.
Although this conventional B-Mode ultrasound imaging provides an effective means for imaging tissue that is in a static state, imaging of the tissue becomes more problematic when used in conjunction with thermal high-intensity ultrasound treatment. As the tissue is ablated during treatment, the heating effects of ultrasound upon the tissue often result in qualitative changes in echo strength, causing brightness variations in the pixel display that do not consistently correspond spatially to the tissue being treated. These brightness variations result in an image display that does not represent the actual shape and size of the region of tissue that is being thermally modified by the treatment, introducing some visual ambiguity to the image.
Several methods are known for monitoring thermal ablation using B-Mode ultrasound imaging. Most of these are based on changes in the energy of ultrasound echoes, and include simple B-Mode displays of echo amplitude, estimates of tissue attenuation from analysis of distal shadowing, and quantification of changes in echo energy. Each of these methods have significant shortcomings because the tissue being treated can appear hyperechoic for reasons other than thermal ablation and because image changes must be qualitatively perceived by the user.
The most successful known methods for monitoring thermal ablation using ultrasound are based on analysis of changes in echo energy rather than a direct analysis of the echo energy. Automatic and quantitative displays of changes in echo energy or tissue attenuation are possible and can help users isolate thermally-induced changes from pre-existing echo characteristics. However, since such methods require integration of echoes over substantial regions of an image scan or “frame,” the resulting images are very limited in spatial resolution. Although energy increases (and therefore B-Mode brightness increases) correspond roughly to lesion (i.e., the thermally treated tissue) position, typically the shape and size of the mapped energy increases do not always spatially correspond to actual lesions, and sometimes are either absent or otherwise unapparent.
There is a need for an improved method of ultrasound imaging that can be utilized in conjunction with therapeutic ultrasound treatment that monitors the thermal effects of the treatment on targeted tissue with greater accuracy and resolution.
The present invention overcomes the limitations of the known art by mapping differences between a first and second echo signal, each signal being obtained at different instants of time. The first and second signals are typically separated by a small time interval. The first and second signals are processed, then a measure of the amplitude of the differences between the first and second signals is made (as contrasted with a measure of the differences in signal amplitude). This difference signal is then spatially filtered and scaled to quantify echo changes associated with changes in tissue state. Difference signals may be summed over multiple time periods to obtain a cumulative map of the changes in the tissue. The resulting signals may be used to generate an ultrasound image that is more representative of the tissue as treatment progresses, providing additional information about where thermal effects are occurring. This allows for verification of successful treatment and modification of unsuccessful treatment. Known ultrasound imaging and treatment transducers may be used, providing users with increased accuracy without a need for special end effectors.
Further features of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which the present invention relates from reading the following specification with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
An overview of an ultrasound treatment method 10 according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Referring additionally to
Referring now to
Equation 1
In Equation 1 Ψ is a spatial difference map (image) of the scaled and filtered difference signal. The filtering may be performed by convolution of the scaled difference signal with a two-dimensional window w. This convolution may be efficiently performed through the use of two-dimensional Fast Fourier Transform (“FFT”) operations.
The difference signal may be normalized to have a maximum value of 1. This approach would result in a spatial map of the echo decorrelation, similar to measures of turbulence in color Doppler imaging systems. However, instead of examining echo decorrelation (a normalized measure of echo differences), a non-normalized map is considered preferable for the present invention because the echo difference is then enhanced in regions of greater echogenicity. Since hyperechoicity is one correlate to tissue ablation, this feature increases the specificity of the method for monitoring thermal ablative medical treatment by providing an image with greater detail.
The spatially filtered signal of
In a second embodiment of the present invention, ultrasound images may be generated as depicted in
In a third embodiment of the present invention, smoothing of the image signal may alternatively be accomplished by using a plurality of image frames, as illustrated in
A fourth embodiment of the present invention is shown in
An expected difficulty for the present invention is artifactual backscatter change due to tissue motion artifacts. This difficulty can be largely overcome by several features of the method. First, backscatter differences can be computed between image frames closely spaced in time. If the tissue moves only a small amount during the interval, motion artifacts are then small. Second, artifacts due to axial tissue motion can be removed effectively by phase compensation during signal processing. That is, before computation of the signal difference, one of the complex image frames is multiplied by a phase compensation function e−iθ, where θ is the low-pass filtered phase of the conjugate product of the two complex image frames. The resulting signal difference is then computed, for example, using Equation 2:
Equation 2
which is an improved echo difference map with reduced tissue motion artifacts.
It is understood that one or more of the previously-described embodiments, expressions of embodiments, examples, methods, etc. can be combined with any one or more of the other previously-described embodiments, expressions of embodiments, examples, methods, etc. For example, and without limitation, any of the ultrasound transducers may be used with other methods of medical treatment, such as producing images to aid in tissue ablation by means of Radio Frequency (RF) and laser energy, various non-ablative ultrasound medical treatments, and various ultrasound imaging applications.
The foregoing description of several expressions of embodiments and methods of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the precise forms and procedures disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto.
This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/153,241, filed May 22, 2002, now abandoned which claims priority to provisional application Ser. No. 60/294,135 filed May 29, 2001. The present invention relates generally to ultrasound, and more particularly, to an ultrasound medical imaging method.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3168659 | Bayre et al. | Feb 1965 | A |
3779234 | Eggleton et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3902501 | Citron et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3927557 | Viertl | Dec 1975 | A |
4211948 | Smith et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4315514 | Drewes et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4323077 | Smith | Apr 1982 | A |
4484569 | Driller et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4646756 | Watmough et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4748985 | Nagasaki | Jun 1988 | A |
4757820 | Itoh | Jul 1988 | A |
4787394 | Ogura | Nov 1988 | A |
4790329 | Simon | Dec 1988 | A |
4798215 | Turner | Jan 1989 | A |
4818954 | Flachenecker et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4844080 | Frass et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4858613 | Fry et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4932414 | Coleman et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4937767 | Reuschel et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4951653 | Fry et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4955365 | Fry et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4955366 | Uchiyama et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4960107 | Aida et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4960109 | Lele | Oct 1990 | A |
4984575 | Uchiyama et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4986275 | Ishida et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5005580 | Okazaki | Apr 1991 | A |
RE33590 | Dory | May 1991 | E |
5015929 | Cathignol et al. | May 1991 | A |
5031626 | Hassler et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5036855 | Fry et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5042486 | Pfeiler et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5054470 | Fry et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5065740 | Itoh | Nov 1991 | A |
5078144 | Sekino et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5080101 | Dory | Jan 1992 | A |
5080102 | Dory | Jan 1992 | A |
5095906 | Ema | Mar 1992 | A |
5095907 | Kudo et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5117832 | Sanghvi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5143073 | Dory | Sep 1992 | A |
5143074 | Dory | Sep 1992 | A |
5148809 | Biegeleisen-Knight et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5149319 | Unger | Sep 1992 | A |
5150711 | Dory | Sep 1992 | A |
5150712 | Dory | Sep 1992 | A |
5158070 | Dory | Oct 1992 | A |
5158071 | Umemura et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5203333 | Nomura | Apr 1993 | A |
5209221 | Riedlinger | May 1993 | A |
5238007 | Giele et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5240005 | Viebach | Aug 1993 | A |
5242437 | Everett et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5295484 | Marcus et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5304115 | Pflueger et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5311869 | Okazaki | May 1994 | A |
5345940 | Seward et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5348017 | Thornton et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5354258 | Dory | Oct 1994 | A |
5370121 | Reichenberger et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5391140 | Schaetzle et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5391197 | Burdette et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5398690 | Batten et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5398691 | Martin et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402792 | Kimura | Apr 1995 | A |
5409002 | Pell | Apr 1995 | A |
5419335 | Hartmann et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421338 | Crowley et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5431663 | Carter | Jul 1995 | A |
5435304 | Oppelt et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5435311 | Umemura et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443069 | Schaetzle | Aug 1995 | A |
5448994 | Iinuma | Sep 1995 | A |
5458597 | Edwards et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465724 | Sliwa et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471988 | Fujio et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474071 | Chapelon et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5485839 | Aida et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5492126 | Hennige et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5500012 | Brucker et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501655 | Rolt et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5514085 | Yoon | May 1996 | A |
5514130 | Baker | May 1996 | A |
5520188 | Hennige et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522869 | Burdette et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5524620 | Rosenschein | Jun 1996 | A |
5526815 | Granz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526816 | Arditi | Jun 1996 | A |
5526822 | Burbank et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5540656 | Pflueger et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545195 | Lennox et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5547459 | Kaufman et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549638 | Burdette | Aug 1996 | A |
5553618 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558092 | Unger et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5569241 | Edwards | Oct 1996 | A |
5571088 | Lennox et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5573497 | Chapelon | Nov 1996 | A |
5575288 | Sliwa et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575772 | Lennox | Nov 1996 | A |
5575789 | Bell et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582588 | Sakurai et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5588432 | Crowley | Dec 1996 | A |
5590657 | Cain et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596991 | Tanaka | Jan 1997 | A |
5601526 | Chapelon et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603326 | Richter | Feb 1997 | A |
5606975 | Liang et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5620479 | Diederich | Apr 1997 | A |
5624382 | Oppelt et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626607 | Malecki et al. | May 1997 | A |
5628743 | Cimino | May 1997 | A |
5630837 | Crowley | May 1997 | A |
5643179 | Fujimoto | Jul 1997 | A |
5649547 | Ritchart et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657760 | Ying et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665054 | Dory | Sep 1997 | A |
5666954 | Chapelon et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676692 | Sanghvi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687729 | Schaetzle | Nov 1997 | A |
5694936 | Fujimoto et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697897 | Buchholtz et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699804 | Rattner | Dec 1997 | A |
5699805 | Seward et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5703922 | Rattner | Dec 1997 | A |
5715825 | Crowley | Feb 1998 | A |
5720287 | Chapelon et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722411 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728062 | Brisken | Mar 1998 | A |
5733315 | Burdette et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735280 | Sherman et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5735796 | Granz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5738635 | Chapelon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743862 | Izumi | Apr 1998 | A |
5743863 | Chapelon | Apr 1998 | A |
5746224 | Edwards | May 1998 | A |
5759154 | Hoyns | Jun 1998 | A |
5759162 | Oppelt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5762066 | Law et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769086 | Ritchart et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769790 | Watkins et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771896 | Sliwa et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776092 | Farin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5779643 | Lum et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782764 | Werne | Jul 1998 | A |
5785705 | Baker | Jul 1998 | A |
5788636 | Curley | Aug 1998 | A |
5800379 | Edwards | Sep 1998 | A |
5807308 | Edwards | Sep 1998 | A |
5810742 | Pearlman | Sep 1998 | A |
5817021 | Reichenberger | Oct 1998 | A |
5817049 | Edwards | Oct 1998 | A |
5820580 | Edwards et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823962 | Schaetzle et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5836896 | Rosenschein | Nov 1998 | A |
5840022 | Richter | Nov 1998 | A |
5840031 | Crowley | Nov 1998 | A |
5860974 | Abele | Jan 1999 | A |
5873828 | Fujio et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873845 | Cline et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873902 | Sanghvi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876399 | Chia et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882302 | Driscoll, Jr. et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893835 | Witt et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895356 | Andrus et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897495 | Aida et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906580 | Kline-Schoder et al. | May 1999 | A |
5928169 | Schatzle et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931805 | Brisken | Aug 1999 | A |
5931848 | Saadat | Aug 1999 | A |
5938600 | Van Vaals et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938608 | Bieger et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944663 | Kuth et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964755 | Edwards | Oct 1999 | A |
5976105 | Marcove et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5979453 | Savage et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984881 | Ishibashi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984882 | Rosenschein et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987523 | Hind et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993389 | Driscoll, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997534 | Tu et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6001069 | Tachibana et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004269 | Crowley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007499 | Martin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010531 | Donlon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013031 | Mendlein et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6022319 | Willard et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024718 | Chen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024740 | Lesh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030344 | Guracar et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039689 | Lizzi | Mar 2000 | A |
6042556 | Beach et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6050943 | Slayton et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053868 | Geistert et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059731 | Seward et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063050 | Manna et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066123 | Li et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071238 | Chapelon et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6071239 | Cribbs et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6071279 | Whayne et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083159 | Driscoll et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6086535 | Ishibashi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6086539 | Guracar et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088613 | Unger | Jul 2000 | A |
6093149 | Guracar et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106470 | Geiser et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106517 | Zupkas | Aug 2000 | A |
6110118 | Guracar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112123 | Kelleher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113558 | Rosenschein et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117101 | Diederich et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128958 | Cain | Oct 2000 | A |
6135963 | Haider | Oct 2000 | A |
6135971 | Hutchinson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138513 | Barabash et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149598 | Tanaka | Nov 2000 | A |
6156029 | Mueller | Dec 2000 | A |
6159207 | Yoon | Dec 2000 | A |
6171248 | Hossack et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176842 | Tachibana et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183469 | Thapliyal et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193664 | Guracar et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193709 | Miyawaki et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206843 | Iger et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210330 | Tepper | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216704 | Ingle et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217576 | Tu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221014 | Bauer | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231834 | Unger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241677 | Guracar et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246898 | Vesely et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258029 | Guracar et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266552 | Slettenmark | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6315723 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322511 | Guracar et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6340348 | Krishnan et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340352 | Okada et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352532 | Kramer et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361531 | Hissong | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371903 | Blanc et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371973 | Tepper | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379320 | Lafon et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425867 | Vaezy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428477 | Mason | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440147 | Lee et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461314 | Pant et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464640 | Guracar et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482178 | Andrews et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488626 | Lizzi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6488630 | Hand et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508774 | Acker et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512957 | Witte | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6521211 | Unger et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533726 | Lizzi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540700 | Fujimoto et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546934 | Ingle et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6562033 | Shah et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6575969 | Rittman et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6599245 | Ma et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602251 | Burbank et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613004 | Vitek et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618620 | Freundlich et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626855 | Weng et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635054 | Fjield et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638235 | Miller et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6641579 | Bernardi et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645202 | Pless et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6659949 | Lang et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669638 | Miller et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673019 | Kamiyama | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682483 | Abend et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6702745 | Smythe | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6716184 | Vaezy et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719694 | Weng et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726677 | Flaherty et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6764488 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6770070 | Balbierz | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6887239 | Elstrom et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902536 | Manna et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6921371 | Wilson | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6936024 | Houser | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6936048 | Hurst | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6974417 | Lockwood et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7035166 | Zimmerman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037306 | Podany et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7063666 | Weng et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7078015 | Unger | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7410469 | Talish et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
20010007940 | Tu et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010014805 | Burbank et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010037073 | White et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020065512 | Fjield et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068934 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087081 | Serrano et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087803 | Jones et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111662 | Iaizzo et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020165579 | Burbank et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183371 | Gordeev et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183742 | Carmel et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193731 | Myers et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004434 | Greco et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030013960 | Makin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030013971 | Makin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014093 | Makin | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018266 | Makin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018358 | Saadat | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028111 | Vaezy et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040698 | Makin et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030047582 | Sonnenschein et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030073907 | Taylor | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030109786 | Irioka et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120270 | Acker | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120306 | Burbank et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030144593 | Whitmore et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030212331 | Fenton et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212332 | Fenton et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220568 | Hansmann et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006336 | Swanson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030268 | Weng et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041880 | Ikeda et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040127791 | Mast et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143252 | Hurst | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050015107 | O'Brien | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050131298 | Cai | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137520 | Rule et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050228286 | Messerly et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240125 | Makin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261585 | Makin et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261587 | Makin et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261588 | Makin et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261610 | Mast et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267488 | Hare et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060052701 | Carter et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060173348 | Wilser et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060235306 | Cotter et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070004984 | Crum et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021691 | Nita et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0897696 | Feb 1999 | EP |
10-14967 | Jan 1989 | JP |
04-307044 | Oct 1992 | JP |
08-084470 | Mar 1996 | JP |
08-084740 | Apr 1996 | JP |
9098980 | Apr 1997 | JP |
09-192139 | Jul 1997 | JP |
10-216146 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-511477 | Nov 1998 | JP |
11-313832 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000-116657 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-126185 | May 2000 | JP |
2000-126197 | May 2000 | JP |
2000-237205 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001-104358 | Apr 2001 | JP |
9529737 | Nov 1995 | WO |
9729709 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9858588 | Dec 1998 | WO |
9933500 | Jul 1999 | WO |
0038580 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0134018 | May 2001 | WO |
0143641 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0145550 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0145550 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0197702 | Dec 2001 | WO |
03075711 | Sep 2003 | WO |
03075771 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2005058138 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005072084 | Aug 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040106870 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60294135 | May 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10153241 | May 2002 | US |
Child | 10721034 | US |