The invention relates to a method for operating a bagging machine according to the preamble to claim 1.
Known from DE 10 2010 028 697 A1 is a bagging machine that is suitable for packaging pourable goods. Provided above the actual bagging machine is a dosing device with screw dosing, with which the pourable goods can be supplied in a dosed form for the individual packages. A vibration sensor is arranged on the dosing device, so as to monitor the proper operation of the dosing device by suitably evaluating the sound signals on the funnel of the dosing device. As soon as a foreign part, in particular a metal part, falls into the dosing device, it triggers corresponding noises and sound signals, which can be acquired with the vibration sensor and detected via suitable signal evaluation. In other words, this means that the vibration sensor enables damage monitoring, so as to prevent the supply of foreign parts, in particular metal parts.
Proceeding from this prior art, the object of the present invention is to propose a method for operating a bagging machine with a vibration sensor and suitable vibration evaluation device, with which the actual packaging process can be improved.
Advantageous embodiments of the invention are the subject of the subclaims.
So-called format tubes are used in known bagging machines to feed the filling material into the individual bags before the latter are sealed by cross welding the tubular film. The film sleeve formed out of the film web with the help of a forming shoulder is guided on the outside of the format tube. The filling material is fed into the interior of the format tube from above, and falls into the still open bags before the latter are sealed by cross welding the film web. As the clock frequencies steadily rise during the production of the bags, so too does the clock with which the filling material must be fed into the bag through the format tube. The steadily rising clock speeds here yield an increasing number of interference sources that can disrupt the operation of the bagging machine. For example, if the filling material becomes obstructed in the format tube, the bags are no longer filled with the desired quantity of filling material, and thus constitute rejected goods. Proceeding from this prior art, it is thus the object of the present invention to propose a method for operating a bagging machine with which the disadvantages to prior art described above can be avoided.
Advantageous embodiments are the subject of the subclaims.
The core idea of the method according to the invention is that the airborne and/or structure-borne sound signals generated by the filling material are measured with a vibration sensor on the format tube during the operation of the bagging machine. This is because the structure-borne sound signals generated by the filling material in the format tube provide significant information about the procedural status of the packaging process, and in particular can identify known interference sources early on. The measurement signals measured with the vibration sensor on the format tube are subsequently evaluated with a vibration evaluation device, and a function signal is output depending on the evaluation result. For example, this function signal can be a stop signal, with which the bagging machine is stopped, e.g., given a blockage of filling material in the format tube. In particular, the process of measuring the airborne and/or structure-borne sound signals on the format tube can be monitored and controlled to ensure that the passage or impact of filling material in the format tube or at the lower end of the format tube generates significant sound patterns, which significantly characterize the packaging process. This results in possible options for detecting interference and self-optimizing the bagging machine.
The sound signals can be acquired with the vibration sensor at basically any location of the format tube. A first preferred method variant provides that the vibration sensor be arranged at the upper end of the format tube under a preformatting container or funnel. In this way, the vibration sensor can be used to measure the sound signal pattern generated by the filling material in the preformatting container or funnel, and thereby monitor it. Alternatively or additionally to the first method variant, the vibration sensor can also be arranged between the upper end and the lower end of the format tube. In this way, the vibration sensor can be used to measure and evaluate the sound signal pattern generated by the filling material as it passes through the format tube as the filling material contacts the interior of the format tube. This type of measurement is particularly suitable for detecting and reacting to blockages in the format tube. Additionally or alternatively to the first two method variants, the vibration sensor at the lower end of the format tube can be arranged above a cross sealing unit. The corresponding vibration sensor can then be used to measure and evaluate the sound signal pattern generated by the filling material as it hits the sealing jaws. In particular, this makes it possible to detect when no filling material or much too little filling material was supplied, thereby only generating a weak sound signal pattern during impact on the sealing jaws. The method according to the invention offers special advantages even when preformatting by means of a preformatting flap takes place in the corresponding packaging process. In these packaging processes, the filling material is first measured with a suitable measuring device, for example a scale, and then prepared for the continued packaging process by being dropped on an initially still closed preformatting flap. In the next work cycle, the preformatting flap is then opened, and the measured quantity of filling material is downwardly filled into the opened bag. By measuring the sound signal patterns in the area of the preformatting flap, the sound signal patterns generated as the filling material impacts the preformatting flap can be detected and monitored. Basically any type of function signal can be output depending on the evaluation result during the evaluation of measurement signals of the vibration sensor. As already described above, for example, the entire bagging machine can be stopped as soon as the evaluation of sound signals has detected an interference in the bagging machine. A preferred method variant provides that a function signal be output depending on the evaluation result, with which the drop pulse of a scale used to weigh the filling material above the preformatting flap is synchronized with the opening pulse of the preformatting flap. The synchronization between the preformatting flap and drop pulse of the scale can be used to eliminate undesired interference events produced by signal fading between the drop pulse and the scale and the preformatting flap.
The method according to the invention will be exemplarily described below based on the drawing.
Shown on:
Located below the format tube 06 is a cross sealing device 08 with two cross jaws 09 for generating cross seams, with which the film sleeve 05 is cross welded into individual bags 10. A separating device 11 is integrated into the cross jaws 09, with which the individual bags 10 can be separated from each other after cross welding.
The filling material 12 for filling the bags 10 is measured with a measuring device, for example a scale 13, in such a way as to reach the respective fill quantity provided for a bag 10. An opening pulse in the scale 13 causes the measured filling material to drop into the funnel 14 lying thereunder. The filling material is merged to the diameter of the format tube 06 via the funnel 14. A first vibration sensor 15 is located at the upper end of the format tube 06 and below the funnel 14, and can be used to acquire the airborne and/or structure-borne signals as the filling material passes through the funnel 14. The corresponding measurement signals are relayed via a cable to a vibration evaluation device 16, so that the measurement signals are evaluated, and interference in the area of the funnel 14 can be detected. For example, suitably comparing the vibration signal patterns with prestored target patterns makes it possible to identify interference with the vibration evaluation device 16, and then to initiate a machine stop as a function thereof, for example.
After the filling material 12 is passed through the funnel 14, it continues to drop down through the format tube, and hits an initially still closed preformatting flap 17. The closed preformatting flap 17 initially holds back the filling material 12, until the bag lying thereunder is transported further, and sealed through cross sealing by means of the cross sealing device 08, so that the next bag can be filled. The airborne and structure-borne signals that arise as the filling material 12 hits the upper side of the preformatting flap 17 can be measured with a vibration sensor 18. The measurement signals of the vibration sensor 18 are likewise evaluated in the vibration evaluation device 16, and suitable function signals are output depending on the measuring result.
In particular the drop pulse of the scale 13 can here be synchronized with the movement control of the preformatting flap 17 by suitably evaluating the sound signals acquired by the vibration sensor 18.
As soon as the preformatting flap 17 is opened after the further transport of the bag lying thereunder, the filling material drops onto the still closed cross sealing jaws 09 of the cross sealing device 08. The airborne and/or structure-born sound signals that arise in this process can be acquired with a vibration sensor 19 and evaluated by means of the vibration evaluation device 16. In particular, this makes it possible to determine if no filling material has dropped down, wherein an undesired interference caused by blockage of the filling material 12 has come about in the format tube 06, for example.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2020 134 190.3 | Dec 2020 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2021/082740 | 11/24/2021 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2022/128371 | 6/23/2022 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3488914 | Csernak | Jan 1970 | A |
3684254 | Henry | Aug 1972 | A |
5540035 | Plahm | Jul 1996 | A |
5819511 | Schlosser | Oct 1998 | A |
6119438 | Bacon | Sep 2000 | A |
6378270 | Araki | Apr 2002 | B1 |
7305933 | Kitagawa | Dec 2007 | B2 |
8707661 | Kinoshita | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8938938 | Konno | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8943786 | Konno | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9003749 | Kamigaito | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9540123 | Vollenkemper | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20030000179 | Nakagawa | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040144177 | Flock et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20140352266 | Seidel et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20200317382 | Savoie-Lavigueur | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2732917 | Apr 1978 | DE |
10131902 | Jan 2003 | DE |
102010028697 | Nov 2011 | DE |
102016205675 | Oct 2017 | DE |
102016213434 | Nov 2017 | DE |
102016215522 | Feb 2018 | DE |
2450223 | Dec 2008 | GB |
H08217028 | Aug 1996 | JP |
2020006982 | Jan 2020 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240034501 A1 | Feb 2024 | US |