Method for operating a capacitive sensor arrangement of a motor vehicle

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10429430
  • Patent Number
    10,429,430
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, November 15, 2016
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 1, 2019
    4 years ago
Abstract
The disclosure relates to a method for operating a capacitive sensor arrangement of a motor vehicle, a control unit being provided, the sensor arrangement having at least one electrode and a connection arrangement which is assigned to the electrode and has a connecting line and, on the latter, a connection on the electrode side and a connection on the control unit side, the electrode being controlled during a measurement routine by the control unit and the resulting distance values being determined on the basis of a measurement capacitance formed by the electrode with respect to a reference potential, the electrical connection state of the electrode being checked with respect to the connection to the control unit during a diagnostic routine by the control unit. It is proposed that the connection state is checked during the diagnostic routine by the control unit.
Description
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application claims the benefit of German Utility Model No. DE 10 2015 119 701.4 filed on Nov. 15, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.


FIELD OF THE TECHNOLOGY

The application relates to a method for operating a capacitive sensor arrangement of a motor vehicle, to a control unit for controlling a capacitive sensor arrangement of a motor vehicle, and to a sensor system of a motor vehicle.


BACKGROUND

Capacitive sensor arrangements are used in various areas of a motor vehicle. One example is the detection of an operating event, in particular approach of a person to the motor vehicle, which, depending on the design, may initiate an authentication dialog. Another example is the detection of an imminent collision between a person and a moving component, for example a tailgate, of the motor vehicle.


The method in question relates to the operation of a capacitive sensor arrangement of a motor vehicle which is used to determine distance values to a measurement object. For this purpose, the sensor arrangement is assigned a control unit for controlling it. The sensor arrangement has two electrodes each assigned a connection arrangement for connection to the control unit. The fault-free connection between the electrodes and the control unit is of very special importance in order to avoid distance values being incorrectly determined on account of high contact resistances, for example.


In the known method for operating a capacitive sensor arrangement of a motor vehicle (DE 10 2013 112 418 A1), on which the present invention is based, a diagnostic routine is provided in order to check the electrical connection state of the electrode with respect to the electrical connection to the control unit. In this case, the check of the electrical connection state quite generally traces back to a check of the electrical resistance of diagnostic paths inside the sensor arrangement. Although the known method makes it possible to reliably detect fault states, the known method always requires that the electrodes each make contact with two connecting lines in order to be able to check the relevant resistance.


SUMMARY

The disclosure is based on the problem of configuring and developing the known method in such a manner that the check of the connection state of the respective electrode is simplified. In the case of a method as described herein, the above problem is solved.


The important factor is the fundamental consideration that a change in the electrical connection between the relevant electrode and the control unit is always also associated with a corresponding change in the magnitude and/or charging behavior of the respective input capacitance between the connection on the control unit side and the reference potential. On the one hand, this is due to the fact that the supply line to the input capacitance can have an increased non-reactive resistance as a result of a faulty electrical connection, which influences the charging behavior of the input capacitance. On the other hand, an electrical interruption inside the electrode or inside a connecting line may result in the magnitude of the input capacitance itself being changed, usually reduced. Both faults can be quite generally detected during the diagnostic routine by using the control unit to check the connection state on the basis of the input capacitance between the connection on the control unit side and the reference potential, in particular on the basis of the capacitive portion of the input impedance between the connection on the control unit side and the reference potential. In this case, it is particularly advantageous that the input capacitance and therefore the connection state can be checked using only a single connecting line since the input capacitance or the input impedance with respect to the reference potential, here ground potential, is available.


In the present case, the term “connection” can be broadly understood. It can relate to any point in the connection between the electrode and the control unit. In this sense, a connection can, but need not, be releasable. However, the connection can be a pluggable connection. The term “connection arrangement” can also be accordingly broadly understood, the connections of which connection arrangement can be arranged on the connecting line or can be coupled to the connecting line indirectly, for example via electrical circuits.


In the present case, the term “control unit” can also be broadly understood. The control unit may be, in principle, a discrete or integrated electrical control circuit, upstream or downstream of which different control circuits can be connected.


In an embodiment, a check is carried out during the diagnostic routine in order to determine whether the magnitude of the input capacitance or the input impedance is in a predetermined permissibility range. In this case, the control unit can resort to the known methods for detecting the magnitude of a capacitance.


Alternatively or additionally, various embodiments can provide for the reaction of the sensor arrangement to predetermined control to be checked during the diagnostic routine. In this case, the level of the charging current, for example, can provide information relating to whether a high-impedance junction is incorrectly present at any point in the connection arrangement.


The input capacitance of the sensor arrangement primarily depends on the capacitance of the respective electrode with respect to ground potential but also on possible filter circuits assigned to the sensor arrangement according to an embodiment. Accordingly, the input capacitance may be subject to different influencing factors. In particular, it has been shown in practice that the input capacitance is often subject to a significant temperature drift. This is routinely insignificant to the determination of distance values during the measurement routine since the distance values can result only from a relative change in the capacitance of the relevant electrode with respect to the ground potential.


In order to be able to take into account influencing factors such as a temperature drift of the input capacitance during the diagnostic routine, the further configurations according to various embodiments provide a reference circuit which is controlled virtually in parallel with the sensor arrangement during the diagnostic routine.


In one variant, the reference circuit is configured according to an embodiment in such a manner that the reference capacitance of the reference circuit has a substantially identical temperature drift to the input capacitance of the sensor arrangement, with the result that it is possible to compensate for a possible temperature drift in the input capacitance using the reference circuit during the diagnostic routine.


In an embodiment, a control unit for controlling an above capacitive sensor arrangement of a motor vehicle for determining a distance to a measurement object is provided. The control unit is designed, in particular, to carry out the proposed method. In this respect, reference can be made to all statements made with respect to the proposed method.


In an embodiment, a sensor system of a motor vehicle having at least one capacitive sensor arrangement for determining a distance to a measurement object and having a control unit for controlling the sensor arrangement is provided. This sensor system is also designed, in particular, to carry out the proposed method, with the result that reference can again be made to all statements made with respect to the proposed method.


An embodiment provides a method for operating a capacitive sensor arrangement of a motor vehicle for determining a distance to a measurement object, a control unit for controlling the sensor arrangement being provided, the sensor arrangement having at least one electrode and a connection arrangement which is assigned to the electrode and has a connecting line and, in a manner coupled to the latter, a connection on the electrode side and a connection on the control unit side, the electrode being controlled during a measurement routine by means of the control unit and the resulting distance values being determined on the basis of a measurement capacitance formed by the electrode with respect to a reference potential, in particular with respect to ground potential, the electrical connection state of the electrode being checked with respect to the connection to the control unit during a diagnostic routine by means of the control unit, wherein the connection state is checked during the diagnostic routine by means of the control unit on the basis of the input capacitance between the connection on the control unit side and the reference potential.


In various embodiments, the input capacitance is the capacitive portion of the input impedance between the connection on the control unit side and the reference potential.


In various embodiments, the sensor arrangement has at least one filter circuit, in particular between the control unit and the connection arrangement or in the connection arrangement, wherein the filter circuit has a low-pass filter and/or a decoupling capacitor and/or an ESD protective element.


In various embodiments, the input capacitance and/or the input impedance is/are in a predetermined permissibility range in the case of a fault-free desired connection state, wherein the input capacitance or the input impedance between the connection on the control unit side and the reference potential is outside the permissibility range in the case of a faulty connection state, and wherein the connection state is detected as a faulty connection state by means of the control unit if the input capacitance or input impedance is outside the permissibility range.


In various embodiments, the input capacitance or the input impedance is determined by means of the control unit and is compared with the permissibility range for the input capacitance or for the input impedance in order to determine the connection state.


In various embodiments, the sensor arrangement is controlled with a diagnostic voltage and/or a diagnostic current by means of the control unit during the diagnostic routine and the connection state of the electrode is inferred from the resulting diagnostic current or the resulting diagnostic voltage.


In various embodiments, the control unit comprises a reference circuit, and wherein the reference circuit and the sensor arrangement are controlled with a diagnostic voltage or a diagnostic current by means of the control unit during the diagnostic routine for determining the connection state of the electrode, wherein the connection state of the electrode is inferred from the resulting measurement currents or measurement voltages, in particular by correlating, in particular comparing, the resulting measurement currents or measurement voltages with one another.


In various embodiments, the reference circuit and the sensor arrangement are controlled in an identical manner during the diagnostic routine by means of the control unit, wherein this control is identical to the control of the sensor arrangement during the measurement routine.


In various embodiments, the diagnostic voltage is a voltage jump or a voltage pulse or an AC voltage, or wherein the diagnostic current is a current step or a current pulse or an alternating current.


In various embodiments, the reference circuit provides a reference capacitance, in particular with respect to the reference potential, which is substantially identical to the input capacitance at least in an operating range, wherein the reference capacitance of the reference circuit has a substantially identical temperature drift to the input capacitance.


In various embodiments, the connection state of the electrode is inferred from the difference between the reference capacitance of the reference circuit and the input capacitance, in particular a difference or a ratio, during the diagnostic routine by means of the control unit.


In various embodiments, the reference circuit is a reference resonant circuit, and wherein the sensor arrangement is connected into the reference resonant circuit during the diagnostic routine by means of the control unit, wherein resulting detuning of the reference resonant circuit is determined by means of the control unit and is used to infer the connection state of the electrode.


In various embodiments, the reference circuit, in particular the reference capacitance, can be parameterized, wherein the input capacitance is determined during a learning routine and the reference circuit is then parameterized.


In various embodiments, the control unit has an integrated component with a computing unit for determining the connection state of the electrode, wherein the reference circuit is in the form of a discrete circuit separate from the integrated component, or wherein the reference circuit is part of the integrated component.


An embodiment provides a control unit for controlling a capacitive sensor arrangement of a motor vehicle for determining a distance to a measurement object, the sensor arrangement having at least one electrode and a connection arrangement which is assigned to the electrode and has a connecting line and, in a manner coupled to the latter, a connection on the electrode side and a connection on the control unit side, the control unit controlling the electrode during a measurement routine and determining the resulting distance values on the basis of a measurement capacitance formed by the electrode with respect to a reference potential, in particular with respect to ground potential, the control unit checking the electrical connection state of the electrode with regard to the connection to the control unit during a diagnostic routine, wherein the control unit checks the connection state during the diagnostic routine on the basis of the input capacitance between the connection on the control unit side and the reference potential.


An embodiment provides a sensor system of a motor vehicle having at least one capacitive sensor arrangement for determining a distance to a measurement object and having a control unit for controlling the sensor arrangement, the sensor arrangement having at least one electrode and a connection arrangement which is assigned to the electrode and has a connecting line and, in a manner coupled to the latter, a connection on the electrode side and a connection on the control unit side, the control unit controlling the electrode during a measurement routine and determining the resulting distance values on the basis of a measurement capacitance formed by the electrode with respect to a reference potential, in particular with respect to ground potential, the control unit checking the electrical connection state of the electrode with regard to the connection to the control unit during a diagnostic routine, wherein the control unit checks the connection state during the diagnostic routine on the basis of the input capacitance between the connection on the control unit side and the reference potential.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The disclosed subject matter is explained in more detail below using a drawing which illustrates only exemplary embodiments and in which:



FIG. 1 shows the rear area of a motor vehicle having a proposed sensor system for carrying out the proposed method by means of a proposed control unit,



FIG. 2 shows a very schematic illustration of the control unit according to FIG. 1 with the sensor arrangement connected thereto,



FIG. 3 shows the control unit according to FIG. 2 with the connected sensor arrangement in a greater degree of detail in a first embodiment, and



FIG. 4 shows the control unit according to FIG. 2 with the connected sensor arrangement in a greater degree of detail in a further embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In order to carry out the proposed method, provision is made of a capacitive sensor arrangement 1 of a motor vehicle 2 which is used to determine a distance 3 to a measurement object, here an operator B. The sensor arrangement 1 is part of a control system 4 which is used to control a motorized closure element 5 of the motor vehicle 2. The control system 4 can be set up here to detect operating events and to control the motorized closure element 5 on the basis thereof. Such closure elements may be, for example, doors such as side and rear doors, in particular sliding doors, flaps, in particular tailgates, trunk lids, hoods, trunk floors or the like. In this respect, the term “closure element” can be broadly understood in the present case.


The motorized closure element 5 here can be a tailgate equipped with a tailgate drive 6.


In order to detect an operating event, which may be a foot movement of the operator B for example, the control system 4 resorts to the distance values determined by the sensor arrangement 1.


A control unit 7 is provided for the purpose of controlling the sensor arrangement 1. The control unit 7 here can be arranged separately from a superordinate controller 8 in the sense of a decentralized structure. In the exemplary embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, the central controller 8 controls the tailgate drive 6 on the basis of control signals from the control unit 7. However, the control unit 7 may fundamentally also be part of the central controller 8.


The sensor arrangement 1 has at least one electrode 9 which here can be elongated. The electrode 9 in some embodiments runs along the closure element 5 and can also be arranged in or on a body part, in particular a bumper. The text below always refers to only one electrode 9. All relevant statements accordingly apply to all further electrodes which are possibly provided.


In order to electrically connect the electrode 9 to the control unit 7, the electrode 9 is assigned a connection arrangement 10 having a connecting line 11 and, in a manner coupled to the connecting line 11, a connection 12 on the electrode side and a connection 13 on the control unit side.


During a measurement routine, the control unit 7 is used to control the electrode 9, the resulting distance values being determined on the basis of a measurement capacitance formed by the electrode 9 with respect to a reference potential, in particular with respect to ground potential M. The measurement capacitance, which is provided by the electrode 9 and whose magnitude changes if the respective measurement object B approaches, is only indicated by a dashed line in FIG. 2 and is provided with the reference symbol 14. The distance values determined during the measurement routine are used during the operating event monitoring discussed above.


In the present case, the check of the electrical connection state of the electrode 9 is at the forefront. In this case, the connection state comprises the state of the connections 12, 13, the state of the connecting line 11 and the state of the electrode 9. The intention is to check whether these components are actually in a conductive state and, in particular, whether high contact resistances result from inadequate connections, for example.


A diagnostic routine which is carried out by the control unit 7 is provided for the purpose of checking the connection state of the electrode 9. The important factor is that the connection state is checked during the diagnostic routine by the control unit 7 on the basis of the input capacitance between the connection 13 on the control unit side and the reference potential, here the ground potential M. The input capacitance is likewise only indicated by a dashed line in FIG. 2 and is provided with the reference symbol 15. The input capacitance 15 is therefore the capacitance on the input side of the sensor arrangement 1.


As discussed above, the proposal has recognized that a change in the connection state of the electrode 9 affects the magnitude and the charging behavior of the input capacitance 15 between the connection 13 on the control unit side and the ground potential M, that is to say the input impedance 15a between the connection 13 on the control unit side and the ground potential M.


According to the proposal, it is not absolutely necessary to determine the input capacitance 15 as such in the form of values during the diagnostic routine. The proposed teaching involves using the influence of a change in the connection state on the magnitude and the charging behavior of the input capacitance 15 to check the connection state.


The diagnostic routine can be carried out cyclically. In an embodiment, however, the diagnostic routine is carried out in a trigger-based manner, that is to say when a predetermined trigger event occurs.


The input capacitance 15 here can be the capacitive portion of the corresponding input impedance 15a between the connection 13 on the control unit side and the reference potential. The input impedance 15a is only indicated in FIGS. 3 and 4.



FIGS. 3 and 4 show that the sensor arrangement 1 has a filter circuit 16, here between the control unit 7 and the connection arrangement 10. The filter circuit 16 can also be provided in the connection arrangement 10. In principle, a plurality of filter circuits 16 may also be provided here. The filter circuit here can have a low-pass filter 17 consisting of a resistor 17a and a capacitance 17b. The filter circuit 16 is also equipped with a decoupling capacitor 18 for decoupling the control unit 7 from DC voltage components which are possibly switched to the electrode 9. Finally, the filter circuit 16 has an ESD (electrostatic discharge) protective element 19 which, in the present case, is a varistor or a protective diode which is connected to ground potential M.


In principle, provision may be made for a faulty connection state to be detected by the control unit 7 by virtue of the input capacitance 15, in particular the input impedance 15a and also in particular its capacitive portion, changing in a predetermined manner.


Specifically, it may be advantageous for the input capacitance 15 and/or the input impedance 15a to be in a predetermined permissibility range in the case of a fault-free desired connection state of the electrode 9. The permissibility range may be defined by the magnitude of the input capacitance 15 in a predetermined temperature range of the ambient temperature of the motor vehicle 2. In this case, provision can be made for the input capacitance 15 and/or the input impedance 15a to be outside the permissibility range, here below the permissibility range, in the case of a faulty connection state, for example in the case of a cable break in the connecting line 11. This is accordingly detected as a faulty connection state by the control unit 7. For this purpose, in one variant, the input capacitance 15 is determined by the control unit 7 and is compared with the permissibility range for the input capacitance 15 in order to determine the connection state of the electrode 9. Various variants which can be easily implemented in terms of circuitry are known for the purpose of determining the input capacitance 15 between the connection 13 on the control unit side and the ground potential M.


Alternatively or additionally, provision may be made for the sensor arrangement 1 to be controlled with a diagnostic voltage and/or with a diagnostic current during the diagnostic routine by the control unit 7, that is to say via the connection 13 on the control unit side, the connection state of the electrode 9 being inferred from the resulting diagnostic current or the resulting diagnostic voltage. In this context, it is conceivable for a high contact resistance, for example at the connection 12 on the electrode side, to result in a relatively low charging current when controlling the connection arrangement 10 with a diagnostic voltage. This low charging current can be detected as a fault state by the control unit 7.



FIGS. 3 and 4 show that the control units 7 there each comprise a reference circuit 20. In this case, provision is made for both the reference circuit 20 and the sensor arrangement 1 to be controlled with a diagnostic voltage or a diagnostic current during the diagnostic routine for determining the connection state of the electrode 9 by the control unit 7. For this purpose, the control unit 7 has accordingly controllable measurement ports 7a, 7b for the reference circuit 20, on the one hand, and for the connection arrangement 10, on the other hand, which are used both to control the reference circuit 20 with voltages and/or currents and the sensor arrangement 1 and to record the resulting measurement currents or measurement voltages. In this respect, the measurement ports 7a are each both a measurement output and a measurement input.


As discussed above, the connection state of the electrode 9 is inferred from the resulting measurement currents or measurement voltages. In this case, the resulting measurement currents or measurement voltages, which are assigned to the reference circuit 20, on the one hand, and are assigned to the connection arrangement 10, on the other hand, are correlated with one another in order to be able to infer the connection state of the electrode 9. In the present case, the term “correlated” comprises any processing of the relevant measurement currents or measurement voltages with one another which provides information relating to a predetermined relationship between the respective size of the reference circuit 20 and the sensor arrangement 1. In the simplest case, the resulting measurement currents or measurement voltages are compared with one another during the correlation.


A configuration which is particularly simple in terms of control results from the fact that the reference circuit 20 and the sensor arrangement 1 are controlled in an identical manner during the diagnostic routine by the control unit 7. This identical control can be carried out at the same time or with a delay. In an embodiment, this control is identical to the control of the sensor arrangement 1 during the measurement routine. Ultimately, it is therefore the case that the control unit 7 respectively controls the reference circuit 20, on the one hand, and the sensor arrangement 1, on the other hand, in order to determine distance values to a measurement object B. An embodiment accordingly provides for the control unit 7 to actually determine the distance values during the diagnostic routine and to process them, in particular compare them with one another, in order to determine the connection state.


It can be pointed out that the term “diagnostic voltage” can be broadly understood in the present case and can comprise a voltage jump, a voltage pulse or an AC voltage. The only important factor is that the diagnostic voltage comprises a change, with the result that at least one charging or discharging operation of the input capacitance 15 can be detected. The term “diagnostic current” can also be broadly understood. It accordingly comprises a current step, a current pulse or an alternating current.


The reference circuit 20 in some embodiments constitutes a circuitry simulation of the sensor arrangement 1 at least to a certain degree. Accordingly, provision can be made for the reference circuit 20 to provide a reference capacitance, here can be with respect to ground potential M, which is substantially identical to the input capacitance 15 at least in an operating range. It can be the case that the reference circuit has an impedance which is substantially identical to the input impedance 15a of the sensor arrangement at least in an operating range.


In the reference circuit 20 shown in FIG. 3, the reference capacitance 21 is the resulting capacitance which is present with respect to ground potential M at the input of the reference circuit 20 and is illustrated by a dashed line in FIG. 3. In the exemplary embodiment which is illustrated in FIG. 4, the reference capacitance 21 is the sum of the individual capacitances 22 which are illustrated in FIG. 4 and are each activated via the switching elements 22a, as is also explained.


In various embodiments, the arrangement is now such that the reference capacitance 21 of the reference circuit 20 has a substantially identical temperature drift to the input capacitance 15 at least over a predetermined temperature range of the ambient temperature of the motor vehicle 2. This makes it possible to ensure that temperature effects do not influence the determination of the connection state of the electrode 9.


In the simplest case, the connection state of the electrode 9 is inferred from the difference between the reference capacitance 21 of the reference circuit 20 and the input capacitance 15 during the diagnostic routine by the control unit 7. In this case, the term “difference” can be broadly understood. It comprises, for example, a difference between the reference capacitance 21 and the input capacitance 15. However, in another embodiment, it also comprises a ratio between the reference capacitance 21 and the input capacitance 15.


In the embodiment according to FIG. 3, the reference circuit 20 also comprises a simulation of the measurement capacitance 14 in addition to a simulation of the filter circuit 16. In addition, the reference circuit 20 may also comprise a circuitry simulation of the connection arrangement 10 (not illustrated). In contrast, in the configuration illustrated in FIG. 4, the reference circuit 20 comprises only a simulation of the measurement capacitance 14 which then results from the sum of the individual capacitances 22 each activated via the switching elements 22a.


In principle, the reference circuit 20 may be in the form of a reference resonant circuit (not illustrated), the sensor arrangement 1 being connected into the reference resonant circuit during the diagnostic routine by the control unit 7. The reference resonant circuit can be configured in such a manner that a change in the input capacitance 15 is associated with detuning of the reference resonant circuit. In this case, provision can be made for resulting detuning of the reference resonant circuit to be determined by the control unit 7 and to be used to infer the connection state of the electrode 9.


In principle, provision may be made for the reference circuit 20, potentially the reference capacitance 21 here, to be able to be parameterized. This is provided in FIG. 4 by the plurality of individual capacitances 22 which can each be connected together by means of a switching element 22a to form the resulting reference capacitance 21. It is therefore readily possible for the input capacitance 15 of the sensor arrangement 1 to be determined during a learning routine and for the reference circuit 20 to then be parameterized. This is particularly simple if, as illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4, the control unit 7 has an integrated component 24 with a computing unit for determining the connection state of the electrode 9. As a result of the fact that the reference circuit 20 is part of the integrated component 24 in the configuration shown in FIG. 4, the reference capacitance 21 can be easily adjusted using software. The connection of the reference capacitance 21 to the measurement port 7a can then also be adjusted using software.


However, in the configuration which is illustrated in FIG. 3 and can be in this respect, the reference circuit 20 is in the form of a discrete circuit separate from the integrated component 24, which is advantageous in so far as this results in a particularly high degree of flexibility in the circuitry simulation of the sensor arrangement 1 discussed above. In this context, it can be pointed out that, although the filter circuit 16 is assigned to the sensor arrangement 1 in the present case, it can be arranged on a printed circuit board of the control unit 7 in the specific implementation.


According to another teaching, the control unit 7 discussed above for controlling the capacitive sensor arrangement 1 is disclosed. Reference can be made to all statements made above with respect to the control unit 7.


According to another teaching, the sensor system 4 of a motor vehicle 2 having the at least one capacitive sensor arrangement 1 is disclosed. Reference can again be made to all statements made with respect to the sensor arrangement 1 and the control unit 7.

Claims
  • 1. A method for operating a capacitive sensor arrangement of a motor vehicle for determining a distance to a measurement object, comprising: performing a measurement routine; andperforming a diagnostic routine;wherein a control unit for controlling the sensor arrangement is provided, the sensor arrangement having at least one electrode and a connection arrangement which is assigned to the electrode and has a connecting line and, in a manner coupled to the latter, a connection on the electrode side and a connection on the control unit side, the electrode being controlled during the measurement routine by the control unit and the resulting distance values being determined on the basis of a measurement capacitance formed by the electrode with respect to a reference potential, the electrical connection state of the electrode being checked with respect to the connection to the control unit during the diagnostic routine by means of the control unit,wherein the connection state is checked during the diagnostic routine by the control unit on the basis of the input capacitance between the connection on the control unit side and the reference potential.
  • 2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the input capacitance is the capacitive portion of the input impedance between the connection on the control unit side and the reference potential.
  • 3. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the sensor arrangement has at least one filter circuit.
  • 4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the input capacitance and/or the input impedance is/are in a predetermined permissibility range in the case of a fault-free desired connection state, wherein the input capacitance or the input impedance between the connection on the control unit side and the reference potential is outside the permissibility range in the case of a faulty connection state, and wherein the connection state is detected as a faulty connection state by the control unit if the input capacitance or input impedance is outside the permissibility range.
  • 5. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the input capacitance or the input impedance is determined by the control unit and is compared with the permissibility range for the input capacitance or for the input impedance in order to determine the connection state.
  • 6. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the sensor arrangement is controlled with a diagnostic voltage and/or a diagnostic current by the control unit during the diagnostic routine and the connection state of the electrode is inferred from the resulting diagnostic current or the resulting diagnostic voltage.
  • 7. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the control unit comprises a reference circuit, and wherein the reference circuit and the sensor arrangement are controlled with a diagnostic voltage or a diagnostic current by the control unit during the diagnostic routine for determining the connection state of the electrode.
  • 8. The method as claimed in claim 6, wherein the reference circuit and the sensor arrangement are controlled in an identical manner during the diagnostic routine by the control unit.
  • 9. The method as claimed in claim 6, wherein the diagnostic voltage is a voltage jump or a voltage pulse or an AC voltage, or wherein the diagnostic current is a current step or a current pulse or an alternating current.
  • 10. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the reference circuit provides a reference capacitance, which is substantially identical to the input capacitance at least in an operating range.
  • 11. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the connection state of the electrode is inferred from the difference between the reference capacitance of the reference circuit and the input capacitance during the diagnostic routine by the control unit.
  • 12. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the reference circuit is a reference resonant circuit, and wherein the sensor arrangement is connected into the reference resonant circuit during the diagnostic routine by the control unit.
  • 13. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the reference circuit can be parameterized.
  • 14. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the control unit has an integrated component with a computing unit for determining the connection state of the electrode.
  • 15. A control unit for controlling a capacitive sensor arrangement of a motor vehicle for determining a distance to a measurement object, the sensor arrangement having at least one electrode and a connection arrangement which is assigned to the electrode and has a connecting line and, in a manner coupled to the latter, a connection on the electrode side and a connection on the control unit side, the control unit controlling the electrode during a measurement routine and determining the resulting distance values on the basis of a measurement capacitance formed by the electrode with respect to a reference potential, the control unit checking the electrical connection state of the electrode with regard to the connection to the control unit during a diagnostic routine, wherein the control unit checks the connection state during the diagnostic routine on the basis of the input capacitance between the connection on the control unit side and the reference potential.
  • 16. A sensor system of a motor vehicle having at least one capacitive sensor arrangement for determining a distance to a measurement object and having a control unit for controlling the sensor arrangement, the sensor arrangement having at least one electrode and a connection arrangement which is assigned to the electrode and has a connecting line and, in a manner coupled to the latter, a connection on the electrode side and a connection on the control unit side, the control unit controlling the electrode during a measurement routine and determining the resulting distance values on the basis of a measurement capacitance formed by the electrode with respect to a reference potential, the control unit checking the electrical connection state of the electrode with regard to the connection to the control unit during a diagnostic routine, wherein the control unit checks the connection state during the diagnostic routine on the basis of the input capacitance between the connection on the control unit side and the reference potential.
  • 17. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the filter circuit has a low-pass filter and/or a decoupling capacitor and/or an ESD protective element.
  • 18. The method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the connection state of the electrode is inferred from the resulting measurement currents or measurement voltages, the resulting measurement currents or measurement voltages with one another.
  • 19. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein this control is identical to the control of the sensor arrangement during the measurement routine.
  • 20. The method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the reference capacitance of the reference circuit has a substantially identical temperature drift to the input capacitance.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10 2015 119 701 Nov 2015 DE national
US Referenced Citations (108)
Number Name Date Kind
2127359 Harley et al. Aug 1938 A
5351519 Kress et al. Oct 1994 A
5394292 Hayashida Feb 1995 A
5844486 Barron et al. Dec 1998 A
5929769 Garnault Jul 1999 A
5959456 Whorlow Sep 1999 A
6275146 Kithil et al. Aug 2001 B1
6337549 Bledin Jan 2002 B1
6478357 Zhou Nov 2002 B2
7217891 Fischer May 2007 B2
7688013 Frommer Mar 2010 B2
7768272 Kato Aug 2010 B2
7880481 Zangl et al. Feb 2011 B2
8027769 Zander et al. Sep 2011 B2
8225458 Hoffberg et al. Jul 2012 B1
8284022 Kachouh Oct 2012 B2
8606467 Gehin Dec 2013 B2
8692565 Togura Apr 2014 B2
8723532 Asjes et al. May 2014 B2
8788152 Reimann et al. Jul 2014 B2
8823394 Reime Sep 2014 B2
8966825 Uebelein Mar 2015 B2
8970232 Kandler Mar 2015 B2
9081032 Lange Jul 2015 B2
9274154 Togura Mar 2016 B2
9283994 Holzberg et al. Mar 2016 B2
9290982 Schuetz et al. Mar 2016 B2
9304156 Weingaertner Apr 2016 B2
9541590 Geuther Jan 2017 B2
9543674 Wuerstlein Jan 2017 B2
9574388 Ebert Feb 2017 B2
9585280 Wuerstlein Feb 2017 B2
9587417 Van et al. Mar 2017 B2
9689982 Herthan Jun 2017 B2
9702682 Kuhnen Jul 2017 B2
9731627 Lamesch et al. Aug 2017 B2
9845629 Washeleski et al. Dec 2017 B2
9939956 Roziere Apr 2018 B2
9995601 Wuerstlein Jun 2018 B2
10107851 Reimann Oct 2018 B2
20020030666 Philipp et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020143452 Losey et al. Oct 2002 A1
20040085079 Lin et al. May 2004 A1
20040178924 Gifford et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050114276 Hunter et al. May 2005 A1
20050231194 Baldi et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060267374 Jackson et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060293800 Bauer et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070072154 Akatsuka et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070102220 Kiribayashi May 2007 A1
20070296242 Frommer Dec 2007 A1
20080068145 Weghaus et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080088188 Busch et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080122454 Kato May 2008 A1
20080195273 Matsuura et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080211519 Kurumado Sep 2008 A1
20080303685 Nakano et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090222174 Frommer et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090243826 Touge et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100079283 Hammerschmidt et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100256875 Gehin et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100259283 Togura Oct 2010 A1
20100289506 Moon et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110084709 Asjes et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110118946 Reimann et al. May 2011 A1
20110133756 Reime Jun 2011 A1
20110234370 Briese et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110254572 Yamaguchi Oct 2011 A1
20110276234 Van Gastel Nov 2011 A1
20110313619 Washeleski et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120188078 Soles et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120290177 Wagenhuber et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130187664 Deumal Herraiz et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130193989 Kuhnen Aug 2013 A1
20130207677 Togura Aug 2013 A1
20130234733 Lange et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130234828 Holzberg et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130311039 Washeleski et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130321006 Weingaertner Dec 2013 A1
20140032055 Holzberg et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140195073 Herthan Jul 2014 A1
20140285217 Van Gastel et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140324273 Russ et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140373447 Gunreben Dec 2014 A1
20150012176 Schindler Jan 2015 A1
20150019085 Ma Jan 2015 A1
20150035549 Sugiura Feb 2015 A1
20150070033 Pohl Mar 2015 A1
20150128497 Schuetz et al. May 2015 A1
20150134208 Gunreben May 2015 A1
20150176322 Wuerstlein Jun 2015 A1
20150176323 Ebert Jun 2015 A1
20150176324 Ebert Jun 2015 A1
20150219703 Geuther Aug 2015 A1
20150233167 Hiroshi Aug 2015 A1
20150241195 Schenkewitz Aug 2015 A1
20150258879 Mandzak Sep 2015 A1
20150267454 Wuerstlein Sep 2015 A1
20150330767 Pohl Nov 2015 A1
20150345205 Gunreben Dec 2015 A1
20160043486 Wuerstlein Feb 2016 A1
20160057882 Wuerstlein Feb 2016 A1
20160245671 Wuerstlein Aug 2016 A1
20160265263 Motoki et al. Sep 2016 A1
20170138997 Wuerstlein May 2017 A1
20170190309 Herthan Jul 2017 A1
20170235413 Koizumi Aug 2017 A1
20170241187 Takayanagi Aug 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (65)
Number Date Country
101809415 Aug 2010 CN
102067450 May 2011 CN
107064721 Aug 2017 CN
4133426 Aug 1993 DE
4408468 Sep 1995 DE
10235925 Feb 2004 DE
10254708 Jun 2004 DE
102004055985 Apr 2006 DE
102004055982 Jun 2006 DE
102004057220 Jun 2006 DE
102005032402 Sep 2006 DE
102005042402 Mar 2007 DE
102005055002 May 2007 DE
202005020140 Jun 2007 DE
10158533 Feb 2009 DE
102008061225 Jul 2009 DE
102009004384 Jul 2009 DE
102009017404 Nov 2009 DE
102008041354 Feb 2010 DE
102009041555 Jun 2010 DE
102008063366 Jul 2010 DE
102009047066 May 2011 DE
102009055778 Jun 2011 DE
102010048144 Jul 2011 DE
102010006213 Aug 2011 DE
102010002559 Sep 2011 DE
102010037577 Mar 2012 DE
102010049400 Apr 2012 DE
102010055297 Jun 2012 DE
102011051434 Jan 2013 DE
102011121775 Jan 2013 DE
102011112274 Mar 2013 DE
102013200871 Jul 2013 DE
102012104915 Dec 2013 DE
102012013065 Jan 2014 DE
102013112418 May 2015 DE
102013112418 May 2015 DE
102013114881 Jun 2015 DE
102015119701 May 2017 DE
0711977 May 1996 EP
1422366 May 2004 EP
2285629 Mar 2012 EP
3171124 May 2017 EP
3171124 Jun 2018 EP
2943190 Sep 2010 FR
2376075 Dec 2002 GB
02055168 Feb 1990 JP
6018547 Jan 1994 JP
2002514986 May 2002 JP
2007228640 Sep 2007 JP
2009079353 Apr 2009 JP
2010531268 Sep 2010 JP
2010236184 Oct 2010 JP
20170057142 May 2017 KR
2005084979 Sep 2005 WO
2007006514 Jan 2007 WO
2010060767 Jun 2010 WO
2010076332 Jul 2010 WO
2011092206 Aug 2011 WO
2012052210 Apr 2012 WO
2012084111 Jun 2012 WO
WO-2013000805 Jan 2013 WO
2013034252 Mar 2013 WO
2013091839 Jun 2013 WO
WO-2013091839 Jun 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (26)
Entry
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/367,786 dated Feb. 14, 2018 (15 pages).
Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & CO.KG, “Sesam oeffne Dich. In: AutomobilKONSTRUKTION,” Feb. 2012 (pp. 50-51), with English translation, 4 pages.
European Search Report for EP Application No. 13713812.2 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,163 dated Oct. 31, 2013 (3 pages).
“Final Office Action,” for U.S. Appl. No. 14/367,786 dated Oct. 31, 2016 (19 pages).
German Search Report for DE Application No. 102011112274.9 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/343,005, dated May 9, 2012 (4 pages).
German Search Report for German Patent Application No. 102013114883.2, dated Feb. 4, 2014 (5 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2013/063905 related to U.S. Appl. No. 14/412,511, dated Aug. 1, 2013 (8 pages) [English Translation].
International Search Report for application No. PCT/EP2013/066998 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/343,005, dated Oct. 26, 2012 (6 pages).
International Search Report for PCT/EP2012/005234 related to U.S. Appl. No. 14/367,786, dated Jun. 14, 2013 (3 pages).
International Written Opinion for PCT/EP2012/005234 related to U.S. Appl. No. 14/367,786, completed Jun. 7, 2014 (10 pages).
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/367,786 dated Feb. 1, 2016 (15 pages).
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/343,005, dated Feb. 11, 2016 (23 pages).
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,163, dated Dec. 17, 2014 (31 pages).
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/412,511, dated Apr. 11, 2016 (20 pages).
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/581,441, dated Jun. 3, 2016 (10 pages).
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,163 dated Nov. 6, 2015 (13 pages).
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,163, dated May 26, 2015 (16 pages).
Office Action for KR Patent Application No. 10-2013-0087175 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,163 completed Jan. 21, 2015 (13 pages).
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 14/367,786 dated Nov. 3, 2015 (8 pages).
Search Report for German Application No. 102012014676.0 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/951,163, dated Jan. 18, 2013 (5 pages).
Search Report for German Patent Application No. 102012013065.1 related to U.S. Appl. No. 14/412,511, dated Jun. 28, 2013 (5 pages).
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/367,786 dated Mar. 1, 2019 (13 pages).
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/367,786 dated Oct. 9, 2018 (10 pages).
Response to Final Rejection dated Oct. 9, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/367,786, submitted via EFS-Web on Feb. 11, 2019, 8 pages.
Response to Non-Final Rejection dated Feb. 14, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/367,786, submitted via EFS-Web on Aug. 14, 2018, 11 pages.
Opposition Proceedings mailed on Mar. 29, 2019, for EP16195945.7 (related to U.S. Appl. No. 15/351,913), 5 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170138997 A1 May 2017 US