The present application is a submission under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2011/001938, filed Apr. 15, 2011, which claims priority to German Application No. 10 2010 015 173.4, filed Apr. 16, 2010, the disclosures of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
The present invention relates to a method for operating a ground milling machine which comprises at least one height-adjustable milling roller. The present invention further relates to a control device for performing this method, and also to a ground milling machine.
Ground milling machines with height-adjustable milling rollers or milling rotors are known from the prior art, with the milling depth in the ground material (of a road surface cover) to be processed being changed via the height adjustment or being adjusted as required by a specific situation, e.g., with respect to uneven portions of the surface. The height adjustment of a milling roller will be produced by one or several actuators. Reference is hereby made to DE 25 40 047 A1.
The lowering of the milling roller is problematic during the operation of a ground milling machine with a height-adjustable milling roller in order to allow the milling roller to penetrate the ground material (e.g., an asphalt bed) or in order to increase the milling depth of the milling roller which is already in engagement with the ground material. During abrupt or rapid lowering of the milling roller, the drive motor of the ground milling machine can be subjected to loads that exceed its power limit, leading to standstill of the motor or—even worse—to damage thereof. Moreover, the chisels on the milling roller can be damaged.
It is an object of the present invention to provide measures for avoiding or reducing the problems occurring in the prior art.
A method in accordance with one aspect of the present invention for operating a ground milling machine which comprises at least one height-adjustable milling roller provides that the milling roller performs a tumbling movement that is automatically controlled by way of open-loop and/or closed-loop control.
This ground milling machine can be a construction machine with a driver cabinet (heavy milling machine) or a hand-guided construction machine (small milling machine). Such a ground milling machine is especially a road milling machine or a trench cutting machine.
A tumbling movement means that the milling roller is not lowered in a rigidly straight or rigidly horizontal manner, but that the downward movement is superimposed with a swaying movement of the milling roller axis, thus producing a swaying or staggering lowering movement. In comparison with a rigidly straight lowering of the milling roller, the increase of the braking torque acting on the milling roller will be lower during the lowering with a superimposed tumbling movement. Moreover, the chisels and chisel holders will be protected. Preferably the tumbling movement is guided in such a way that at most only 50% of the milling cutters on an engagement line are in engagement with the ground material. As a result, a more rapid penetration of the milling rotor into the ground material, especially hard ground material, is achieved.
Open-loop control means that the tumbling movement of the milling roller will be performed in a predetermined manner. Closed-loop control, on the other hand, means an automated process in which the tumbling motion is changed in a control loop and adjusted as required by the respective situation. The open-loop and/or closed-loop control preferably occurs in a software-based manner.
Preferably the tumbling movement is a three-dimensional (spatial) staggering movement of the milling roller axis. A three-dimensional staggering movement shall especially mean that at least one end, and preferably both ends, of the milling roller axis perform a rolling motion. This will be described below in greater detail with reference to
The tumbling movement can also be a two-dimensional tilting movement of the milling roller axis. Such a two-dimensional tilting movement of the milling roller axis can be produced by an automated alternating actuation of the axially oppositely disposed actuators for height adjustment of the milling roller, thus leading to an alternating pendulum movement of the milling roller axis during the lowering process. This will be explained below in greater detail with reference to
The method in accordance with the present invention offers many advantages. The method in accordance with the present invention ensures that there are fewer malfunctions in milling operation, for example, thereby increasing operating convenience and improving operational reliability of the ground milling machine. Furthermore, the chisels and the chisel holders on the milling roller are protected, which consequently extends service life.
The drive motor of a ground milling machine provides both the driving power required for the travelling drive of the ground milling machine and also for the rotational drive of the milling roller. Furthermore, the drive motor also provides the drive power for the ancillary units such as, for example, the actuators for the height adjustment of the milling roller. The drive motor typically is a diesel engine which originally provides high torque. However, the drive motor can be “killed” if the milling roller is lowered too quickly. Small-size milling machines are especially affected by this problem. Furthermore, components of the drive train can be damaged.
Therefore, according to a preferred further development of the method in accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the momentary speed or power of the drive motor of the ground milling machine will be detected during lowering of the milling roller and the lowering speed of the milling roller will be reduced automatically when the momentary speed or power reaches or falls beneath a critical level. Consequently, the lowering speed over the lowering path (lowering distance) is not constant but variable. The lowering speed of the milling roller will be increased automatically again when the momentary speed or power of the drive motor exceeds the critical level again.
As a result of the automatic reduction in the lowering speed, at least the increase in the braking torque which acts on the milling roller and which is produced by the engagement of the chisels arranged on the milling roller in the ground material will be reduced, so that the drive motor will not be loaded abruptly up to its power limit or beyond. The reduction in the lowering speed occurs in a controlled manner in this case, e.g., by a predetermined amount (by a defined percentage rate for example). Alternatively, a closed-loop control of the lowering speed is possible, as will be described below in greater detail. Within the scope of the present invention, instead of the momentary rotational speed or the momentary power of the drive motor, a corresponding operating parameter such as the momentary rotational speed of the milling roller (especially in the case of a rigid gear ratio) can be detected and compared with a defined critical level. Furthermore, in case of hydraulically driven milling rollers, for example, the pressure and/or the pump volume can be used.
Alternatively or, if necessary, in addition to a control of the lowering speed, during the lowering of the milling roller the momentary speed or power of the drive motor of the ground milling roller will be detected and the lowering speed of the milling roller will automatically be controlled and changed depending on said detected speed or power in a closed-loop control process by way of a control loop. This advantageously provides for the maximum possible lowering speed of the milling roller at any time during operation.
A closed-loop control of the lowering speed means an automatic process in which a change in the lowering speed over the lowering path as required by the current situation will occur in a control loop. On the other hand, an open-loop control of the lowering speed means an automated process in which, if required, the change in the lowering speed over the lowering path will occur in a defined manner, i.e., in a predetermined manner. Prior art milling rollers will be lowered without giving special attention to the lowering speed and especially without open-loop and/or closed-loop control processes related to the lowering speed.
If the construction machine comprises several height-adjustable milling rollers, the lowering can separately or jointly be controlled via open-loop and/or closed-loop control. If several actuators are provided for the height adjustment of a milling roller, the lowering speed can preferably be controlled via open-loop and/or closed-loop control for every single actuator (in a separate or in a common control loop). Despite the tumbling movement, open-loop and/or closed-loop control of the lowering speed of the milling roller is therefore possible. It is also possible to realize a tumbling movement of the milling roller by a separate triggering of the actuators and the respective open-loop and/or closed-loop control of the lowering speeds. The open-loop and/or closed-loop control of the lowering speed can be produced, for example, by a separate adjustment of the hydraulic pressure in the actuators and/or the volume flow (of a hydraulic oil or the like) to the respective actuators.
Further, the closed-loop control process will preferably only occur as long as the momentary speed or power of the drive motor reaches or falls beneath a critical level, and the closed-loop control process will automatically be terminated (again) when the momentary speed or power of the drive motor exceeds the critical level again.
Furthermore, alternatively and/or additionally, the lowering speed of the milling roller can be controlled in a closed-loop and/or open-loop manner depending on the momentary travelling speed of the ground milling machine. This allows for taking into account the influence of the travelling speed of the ground milling machine on the braking torque acting on the milling roller.
In order to prevent the killing of the drive motor, it is also possible to control and thus change the momentary travelling speed of the ground milling machine depending on the momentary lowering speed of the milling roller by way of closed loop and/or open loop control. This can occur as an alternative and/or in addition to other closed-loop and/or open-loop control processes. The idea is finding an operating point during the lowering of the milling roller for the ground milling machine at which the power provided by the drive motor is distributed among the individual consumers (travelling drive, rotational drive, actuators) in the best possible way without loading the drive motor beyond its optimal maximum power point.
The present invention will be explained below in closer detail by way of example by reference to the enclosed drawings, which schematically show as follows:
The milling depth H can be changed in milling operation via a height adjustment by means of the actuators 20a/20b, which especially can be hydraulically actuated actuators (so-called lifting columns). Furthermore, the rotating milling roller 10 can be lowered into the ground material S via the actuators 20a/20b at the beginning of the milling operation. The lowering movement is indicated with the arrow A.
In the case of an abrupt or too rapid lowering of the milling roller 10, the drive motor of the ground milling machine can be overloaded. In order to avoid this, it is provided that the milling roller 10 performs a tumbling movement which is automatically controlled by way of open-loop and/or closed-loop control during the lowering A during operation. This will be described below in greater detail in connection with
In order to actualize the tilting movement T, it is not necessary that only one of the actuators 20a and 20b is actuated. It is also possible that both actuators 20a and 20b are operated simultaneously but with an alternating different lowering speed.
Box I represents a momentary (i.e., at a specific time of operation) braking torque acting on the milling roller 10, which braking torque is produced by the engagement of the chisels arranged on the milling roller 10 in the ground material S. The momentary braking torque depends on the ground material S or the condition of the ground (strength, composition, porosity, etc.). The momentary braking torque further depends on the momentary speed of the milling roller 10, the milling depth H and the momentary travelling speed of the ground milling machine (not an exhaustive listing).
At a given drive power of the drive motor of the ground milling machine, a rising braking torque in the milling roller 10 will lead to a reduction in the speed D of the drive motor. Since a lowering of the milling roller 10 leads to an additional increase in the braking torque acting on the milling roller 10, this can lead to the consequence that the system reaches or falls beneath a critical speed level. Box II represents the permanent detection of the momentary speed D of the drive motor.
The detected momentary speed D will be compared with a predetermined critical speed K for monitoring purposes (box III). Once the detected momentary speed D reaches the critical speed K or falls beneath this level, a closed-loop control process will be started in which the lowering speed of the milling roller 10 actualized by means of the actuators 20a and 20b will be reduced (box IV) until the detected momentary speed D of the drive motor exceeds the critical speed K again. The reduction in the lowering speed can be produced, for example, by a respective triggering of the control valves for the actuators 20a and 20b (changing the hydraulic pressure in the actuators and/or the volume flow to the respective actuators), with a reduction of the lowering speed down to the value of 0 (stop of lowering movement) also being possible. It is also possible to lift the milling roller 10 slightly in the opposite direction (−A) again. A PID controller (box III) is preferably used for the closed-loop control.
Similarly, for example, the pressure level of the hydraulic drive of the milling roller 10 could also be detected in the aforementioned control loop and compared with a critical pressure level for the purpose of monitoring and/or closed-loop control.
While the present invention has been illustrated by description of various embodiments and while those embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of Applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such details. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. The present invention in its broader aspects is therefore not limited to the specific details and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of Applicant's invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2010 015 173 | Apr 2010 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/001938 | 4/15/2011 | WO | 00 | 12/5/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/128114 | 10/20/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3695721 | Jungel | Oct 1972 | A |
3750762 | Eaton | Aug 1973 | A |
3860292 | Bechem | Jan 1975 | A |
4343513 | Godbersen | Aug 1982 | A |
4663868 | Fauerbach et al. | May 1987 | A |
6033031 | Campbell | Mar 2000 | A |
6076289 | Bitelli | Jun 2000 | A |
6921230 | Silay | Jul 2005 | B2 |
20070194617 | Moller et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090311045 | Jurasz et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100014917 | Willis et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110193397 | Menzenbach et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
25 40 047 | Mar 1977 | DE |
10 2006 020 293 | Nov 2007 | DE |
0 976 872 | Feb 2000 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Espacenet.com, English Machine Translation of German Application No. DE2540047A1, published Mar. 17, 1977, retrieved from http://worldwide.espacet.com on Sep. 27, 2012 (5 pages). |
German Patent Office, English Translation of Claim 1 of German Application No. DE2540047A1, published Mar. 17, 1977 (1 page). |
Espacenet.com, English Machine Translation of German Application No. DE102006020293A1, published Nov. 8, 2007, retrieved from http://worldwide.espacet.com on Sep. 27, 2012 (11 pages). |
European Patent Office, International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/EP2011/001938, dated Jun. 1, 2012 (2 pages). |
The International Bureau of WIPO, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/EP2011/001938, dated Oct. 16, 2012 (6 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130082507 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |