Method for operating a remote control, and remote control

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6633227
  • Patent Number
    6,633,227
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 9, 2000
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 14, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A method of allocating a remote control to a base station. The base station delivers a search signal. The remote control receives the search signal, compares it with a reference signal, and delivers a contact signal if they match. On receiving certain contact signals in response, the base station then delivers an identification signal, and after receiving it, the remote control sends back to the base station a code signal identifying it unambiguously.
Description




BACKGROUND INFORMATION




The present invention relates to a method like that described in German Patent Application 196 45 769 (non-published). According to that method, a remote control is allocated to a base station arranged in a motor vehicle by having the base station transmit a search signal, whereupon any remote controls within the field of range of the search signal respond by sending back a contact signal at times characteristic of the remote controls. By analyzing the receipt times of the contact signal acknowledgments, the base station determines which remote controls are present. It selects one of them to perform a challenge/response verification with it. Since the information about which remote controls are present is not contained in the contact signal but in the time of its return, the contact signal may have a simple structure, and thus the entire identification can take place very rapidly. The identification speed is determined only by the number of time windows made available for the individual remote controls. However, if a base station is to be allocated a very large number of remote controls, this method loses its advantage of being fast.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




An object of the present invention is to provide a method and a device suitable for carrying it out, permitting an allocation of a large number of remote controls to one base station and performing the allocation rapidly.




The method according to the present invention makes it possible to allocate a large number of remote controls to one base station with no change in the high allocation identification speed by allocating multiple remote controls to individual time slots. The number of time slots may be kept low, and the allocation identification speed may be kept high. An additional control signal with which the base station prompts the remote controls to transmit their device codes is advantageously used to differentiate multiple remote controls responding in the same time slot. The base station uses the interpretability of the device codes sent back as identification information. To select a certain remote control, the remote controls are induced to deliver random contact signals, with the first remote control responding unambiguously being selected. Therefore, the unambiguous identification of a remote control is made rapidly with only a few steps even when there are multiple remote controls assigned to the same time slot within the range of the base station.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

shows a block diagram of an allocation arrangement.





FIG. 2

shows a flow chart illustrating an operation of the allocation arrangement.





FIG. 3

shows the principle of time slot allocation.





FIG. 4

shows the structure of a search signal.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




In

FIG. 1

, reference number


10


denotes a base station, which may be part of a device or an object or is fixedly allocated to such. For example, the base station may be part of the access control equipment of a building or a motor vehicle. Reference number


20


denotes an operating device, referred to below as a remote control, which is functionally allocated to base station


10


via a signal transmission link


30


in a non-contact method. Remote control


20


may be a transponder, for example. Base station


10


acts by way of linkages (not shown) on the technical device to whose part or to which it is allocated.




The core of base station


10


is a microprocessor


13


which monitors and prompts the output of signals by base station


10


in particular and analyzes incoming signals. It is connected by a coder/decoder unit


12


to a transceiver


11


for delivering and receiving signals transmitted over signal transmission link


30


in a non-contact method. Coding/decoding unit


12


is used to encode/decode the signals exchanged between microprocessor


13


and transceiver


11


. Microprocessor


13


has a memory


15


containing a serial number


16


, a device code


17


, a cryptographic key code


31


as well as a directory


18


that includes the group numbers as well as device codes


27


allocated to the group numbers and belonging to remote controls


20


allocated to base station


10


. Device code


17


identifies the respective device, i.e., base station


10


unambiguously. It is issued to the base station by the manufacturer and cannot be altered. Serial number


16


is characteristic of mutually allocated base stations


10


and remote controls


20


. Group numbers


28


entered in directory


18


differentiate remote controls


20


allocated to a base station


10


and having the same serial numbers; device code


27


allocated in each case in combination with the cryptographic key code


31


is used to verify a remote control


20


belonging to the group number. Equivalent to separate storage of cryptographic key code


31


and device code


27


, a combination of the two used in verification may also be stored directly in directory


18


. Furthermore, directory


18


also contains device codes


27


of remote controls that are no longer allowed, e.g., because they have been lost or stolen Serial numbers


16


are issued by the manufacturer of the technical equipment and allocated to base station


10


and remote controls


20


. When using the arrangement in motor vehicles, this assignment can be made by the automotive manufacturer, who will also determine cryptographic key code


31


by means of which it is possible to verify that a remote control


20


belongs to base station


10


.




Remote control


20


has a transceiver


21


corresponding to transceiver


11


assigned to the base station for receiving signals transmitted by base station


10


and for relaying signals transmitted in a non-contact method to base station


10


. Like the base station, a coding/decoding unit


22


is connected downstream from transceiver


21


for encoding/decoding coded signals. A microprocessor


24


connected to coding/decoding unit


22


performs the analysis of the signals received by transceiver


21


, initiates subsequent measures depending on the results and monitors output of output signals. A memory unit


25


is provided for microprocessor


24


. It has a memory location for storing serial number


16


, a memory location for storing a device code


27


, a memory location for storing a group number


28


and a memory location for storing a cryptographic key code


31


. The meaning of the memory contents here corresponds to the meaning of similar memory contents in memory


15


of base station


10


. Serial number


16


is a code that is characteristic of the device as a whole composed of base station


10


and respective operating elements


20


and is identical to the serial number contained in memory


15


of base station


10


. Group number


28


is used to differentiate remote controls


20


having the same serial number. It is assigned by the user in using the device as a whole. Device code


27


is issued by the manufacturer of remote control


20


and identifies it unambiguously. Cryptographic key code


31


is identical to the key code in base station


10


and is used to verify that a given remote control belongs to a base station


10


. It is issued by the manufacturer of the technical equipment belonging to base station


10


.




There is a signal transmission link


30


between base station


10


and remote control


20


for transmitting signals without contact between transceiver


21


in the remote control and transceiver


11


in the base station. Signals transmitted by transceiver


11


in the base station reach all remote controls


20


within its range simultaneously. Infrared signals or high-frequency signals are advantageously used as the signals.




Multiple remote controls


20


may be allocated to one base station


10


. All allocated remote controls


20


and base station


10


itself have an identical serial number


16


in their memories


15


,


25


and use an identical cryptographic key code


31


in the verification. Individual remote controls


20


are differentiated by their group numbers. They are usually simply issued so that a remote control is unambiguously identified by group number


28


. Specific group numbers may also be assigned to multiple remote controls


20


at the same time. Such remote controls


20


provided with an identical group number


28


differ in their device code


27


.




The functioning of the device shown in

FIG. 1

is explained below on the basis of

FIGS. 2 and 3

. The method steps in

FIG. 2

are each preceded by a letter B or F, indicating whether the respective step takes place in base station


10


: B or in remote control


20


: F.




The allocation identification process is (usually) initiated by a user by operating a mechanical, electrical or electro optical triggering mechanism (not shown) (step


100


). When used in conjunction with a motor vehicle, the triggering mechanism may involve operation of the door handle, for example. On the basis of a signal delivered after this triggering, microprocessor


13


of base station


10


initiates the delivery of a search signal by transceiver


11


(step


102


). As indicated in

FIG. 4

, the search signal contains a starting frequency


35


, preferably implemented as a start bit, and serial number


16


stored in memory


15


. It is preferably unencoded. The search signal is received by all remote controls


20


within the range of signal transmission link


30


via their transceivers


21


. On receipt of a search signal, their microprocessors


24


check on whether serial number


16


transmitted with the search signal matches serial number


16


, which is used as a reference signal and is stored in memory


25


of remote control


20


. Start bit


35


which is also transmitted is used to synchronize microprocessor


24


with the received search signal. If microprocessor


24


finds a match between the received serial number and the serial number present in memory


25


, it initiates output of a response in the form of a contact signal (step


104


). A short signal with a simple structure, e.g., the group number of respective remote control


20


in bit-coded form is used as the contact signal. It is preferably unencoded, like the search signal. Microprocessor


24


causes the search signal to be transmitted after expiration of a period of time after receipt of the search signal, the period of time, characteristic of operating element


20


, being determined by the group number. This takes place in a time window of a predetermined length. The transmission is of such a length that reliable allocation of a contact signal to a time window is possible for both remote control


20


and base station


10


.





FIG. 3

illustrates in the form of a graph the behavior of remote controls


20


in response to a search signal. The abscissa represents a time axis t subdivided into, for example, eight time windows F


0


, . . . , F


7


, beginning with receipt of the search signal in remote controls


20


. The ordinate shows group number


28


of the respective remote control


20


. In

FIG. 3

, eight group numbers


0


through


7


are assigned to one base station


10


. Let us assume that there is one remote control with each of group numbers


0


and


2


as well as three remote controls having group number


7


. They all respond to the search signal by transmitting a contact signal according to step


104


. In this example, let us assume that the time of transmission of the contact signal, i.e., the ordinal number of the respective time signal, corresponds to the group number of the respective remote control. Therefore, the remote control having group number


2


transmits its contact signal in time window F


2


after waiting time T


2


, the remote controls having group number


6


transmit their contact signals in time window F


6


after waiting time T


6


. Consequently, transceiver


11


of base station


10


receives two staggered contact signals appearing in windows F


2


and F


6


, indicating directly which remote controls


20


designated by their group numbers are within the range of signal transmission link


30


.




By determining whether and in which time windows F


0


through F


7


contact signals have been received, microprocessor


13


determines which remote controls


20


are present (step


106


). Remote controls


20


that are present are noted by appropriate entries in memory


15


. If no remote control


20


is found to be present, a termination signal is issued (step


108


), terminating the identification attempt.




After determining which remote controls


20


are present, microprocessor


13


makes a selection determining with which of them a verification of the allocation is to be made (step


112


). In doing so, it checks first to determine whether remote controls


20


designated unambiguously by group numbers issued only once are present. If this is the case, it selects one of them for the subsequent verification communication. The basis for this selection may be, for example, a ranking of remote controls


20


on the basis of which the remote controls are given different function ranges, for example.




The selected remote control


20


subjects base station


10


to an accuracy test. This test is performed in the manner of the known challenge/response procedure. Base station


10


sends a random number generated for this purpose as a challenge to remote control


20


(step


130


). At the same time, microprocessor


13


forms a desired response signal according to a preset algorithm from device code


28


of the respective remote control


20


stored in directory


18


, cryptographic key code


31


and the random number. Meanwhile, the challenge signal sent to remote control


20


is received by its transceiver


21


and relayed to microprocessor


24


. The microprocessor derives a response signal from the received challenge signal in the same way as microprocessor


13


of base station


10


and sends it back to base station


10


(step


132


). After receiving the response signal sent back, microprocessor


13


compares it with the desired response signal determined previously and delivers an enable signal if they match or it delivers a blocking signal if they do not match. A blocking signal is delivered in particular when device code


27


contained in the response signal belongs to a remote control


20


which has been blocked, e.g., due to loss or theft.




If the analysis of remote controls


20


that are present in step


112


reveals that only remote controls


20


with group numbers


28


issued to multiple devices are present, microprocessor


13


causes an identification signal to be delivered by transceiver


11


(step


114


). It causes microprocessors


24


of remote controls


20


that are present to respond by sending back device codes


27


that are present in memories


25


. All remote controls


20


that are present respond at the same time (step


116


). Microprocessor


13


of base station


10


then checks the device codes sent back in response to transmission of a separation signal to determine whether the signal received on the whole corresponds in form to a device code and can be identified with a device code stored in memory


15


(step


118


). If that is the case, then only a single remote control


20


with a group number issued to multiple devices is present. Microprocessor


13


then continues to perform a simplified verification communication procedure. To do so, it sends remote control


20


a challenge signal represented by a random number (step


134


) and at the same time it generates a desired response signal from the random number by linking it with cryptographic key code


31


. Meanwhile, remote control


20


proceeds in the same way with the challenge signal sent. It sends the resulting encoded signal back to base station


10


(step


136


). Its microprocessor


13


compares the response signal received back with the desired response signal determined previously and delivers an enable signal if they match or a blocking signal if they do not match.




If the check of the signal received on the whole in step


118


reveals that it cannot be interpreted as an unambiguously identifiable device code, microprocessor


13


causes a separation signal to be sent (step


120


). It is received by remote controls


20


and relayed to their respective microprocessors


24


. The separation signal causes it to deliver a contact signal in a randomly selected time window not linked to group number


28


. After receiving a separation signal, microprocessors


24


of remote controls


20


each cause the randomly controlled selection of a time window (step


122


). To do so, they link device code


27


present in memory


25


, for example, with a random number generated by the microprocessor or sent previously by base station


10


. It then prepares the return of the contact signal for the randomly selected time window.




Meanwhile, microprocessor


13


of base station


10


awaits the receipt of the first contact signal (step


124


). As soon as it detects receipt of the first contact signal, it no longer accepts any other incoming contact signals. At the same time, it causes a control signal to be sent (step


126


), which in turn blocks transmission of other prepared contact signals by remote controls


20


in subsequent time windows. Remote controls


20


which have been prevented from sending signals no longer participate in the following communication. Then, microprocessor


13


again causes an identification signal to be sent (step


114


) to the remote controls


20


still participating in the communication. They respond in turn by sending back their device codes (step


116


) which are analyzed by microprocessor


13


at base station


10


for unambiguous interpretability. If it finds that the response signal received in response to transmission of the separation signal can be interpreted unambiguously and can be allocated to a device code


17


stored in memory


15


, microprocessor


13


proceeds in performing the allocation accuracy test according to step


130


. If no unambiguous interpretability is found with the test in step


118


, microprocessor


13


repeats steps


114


through


126


until the test in step


128


yields an unambiguously identifiable device code. If, in running through the loop defined by steps


114


through


126


, microprocessor


13


finds that no response signal has been received in response to an identification signal, it interrupts the allocation communication (step


138


) and/or it causes additional suitable subsequent measures to be taken.




The method and the device described here can be further embodied and modified while retaining the basic idea of allowing multiple occupancy of individual time windows in an allocation based on the time window principle and permitting identification of a remote control belonging to a multiply occupied time window by analyzing a signal delivered simultaneously by all the remote controls that are present to determine whether it is interpretable. For example, this is true of the structure of the base stations of the remote controls or for the number and sequence of method steps. For example, after determining which remote controls are present, all those identified as present may be verified.



Claims
  • 1. A method of allocating a remote control to a base station, comprising the steps of:causing the base station to deliver a search signal; causing the remote control to receive the search signal; causing the remote control to compare the search signal with a reference signal; if the search signal matches the reference signal, causing the remote control to deliver a contact signal after a period of time that is determined by a group number and that is characteristic of the remote control has elapsed; causing the base station to deliver an identification signal after the contact signal is received; causing the remote control to receive the identification signal; and causing the remote control to send back a device code that unambiguously identifies the remote control, wherein the remote control is differentiated by the device code from another remote control associated with the same group number.
  • 2. A base station, comprising: a transceiver including:an arrangement for delivering a search signal and an identification signal, an arrangement for receiving a contact signal and a device code from a remote control, and an arrangement for performing at least one of a triggering operation and an analyzing operation with respect to a signal to be at least one of sent and received by the transceiver; wherein the transceiver delivers the identification signal on receipt of a contact signal associated with the remote control and the identification signal causes every remote control receiving the identification signal to send back a respective device code identifying unambiguously every remote control receiving the identification signal.
  • 3. The base station according to claim 2, further comprising:a microprocessor for testing a device code received from the remote control in order to achieve an unambiguous interpretability.
  • 4. The base station according to claim 3, wherein:the transceiver delivers a separation signal when the device code cannot be interpreted unambiguously.
  • 5. The base station according to claim 4, wherein:the transceiver delivers a blocking command for suppressing a transmission of subsequent contact signals by other remote controls on receipt of a first contact signal in response to the separation signal.
  • 6. The base station according to claim 3, wherein:the microprocessor analyzes received contact signals for a time of receipt with respect to a transmission of the search signal in order to identify an operating element.
  • 7. A remote control, comprising:a transceiver including: an arrangement for receiving a search signal and an identification signal, an arrangement for delivering a contact signal and a device code, wherein the contact signal is delivered after a period of time characteristic of the remote control and determined by a group number has elapsed after receipt of the search signal, and an arrangement for performing at least one of an analyzing operation and a triggering operation with respect to a signal to be at least one of received and sent.
  • 8. The remote control according to claim 7, wherein:the transceiver delivers the device code on receipt of the identification signal.
  • 9. The remote control according to claim 7, wherein:the transceiver receives a separation signal, and the transceiver prepares a delivery of the contact signal in a randomly selected time window on receipt of the separation signal.
  • 10. A device, comprising:a base station provided with a first transceiver including: an arrangement for delivering a search signal and an identification signal, an arrangement for receiving a contact signal and a device code from a remote control, and an arrangement for performing at least one of a triggering operation and an analyzing operation with respect to a signal to be at least one of sent and received by the transceiver; and a plurality of remote controls, each remote control provided with a respective second transceiver including: an arrangement for receiving the search signal and the identification signal, an arrangement for delivering the contact signal and the device code, wherein the contact signal is delivered after a period of time characteristic of the remote control and determined by a group number has elapsed after receipt of the search signal, and an arrangement for performing at least one of an analyzing operation and a triggering operation with respect to the signal to be at least one of received and sent, wherein each one of the remote controls is identified by respective group numbers, and wherein at least one group number is assigned to multiple remote controls at the same time.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
197 34 341 Aug 1997 DE
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/DE98/02253 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO99/08471 2/18/1999 WO A
US Referenced Citations (6)
Number Name Date Kind
5266925 Vercellotti Nov 1993 A
5640151 Reis et al. Jun 1997 A
5781106 Liger Jul 1998 A
5822714 Cato Oct 1998 A
6172596 Cesar et al. Jan 2001 B1
6177858 Raimbault et al. Jan 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
197 43 101 May 1998 DE
0 322 701 Jul 1989 EP
2 116 808 Sep 1983 GB