Patent Grant
11208967
The present application is a 371 of International application PCT/EP2018/071435, filed Aug. 7, 2018, which claims priority of DE 10 2017 214 001.1, filed Aug. 10, 2017, the priority of these applications is hereby claimed and these applications are incorporated herein by reference.
The invention concerns a method for operating an internal combustion engine, an injection system for an internal combustion engine set up to carry out such a method, and an internal combustion engine with such an injection system.
From the German patent specification DE 10 2014 213 648 B3 a method for operating an internal combustion engine with an injection system is known, wherein the injection system comprises a high-pressure accumulator, and wherein a high pressure in the high-pressure accumulator is controlled by a low-pressure suction throttle as the first pressure control element in a first high-pressure control circuit. In a normal mode, a high-pressure disturbance variable is generated via a high-pressure pressure control valve, which is used as the second pressure control element, wherein fuel from the high-pressure accumulator is re-directed into a fuel reservoir at low pressure. The pressure control valve is controlled in the normal mode on the basis of a setpoint volumetric flow for the fuel to be re-directed.
If the load is suddenly reduced on such an internal combustion engine operated in such a way, in particular a complete load reduction from a full load state, first the high pressure in the high-pressure accumulator rises, since the amount of fuel to be injected into the internal combustion engine's combustion chambers is quickly cancelled, wherein the high pressure control responds with a delay. However, in this case, the high-pressure disturbance variable, i.e. the setpoint volumetric flow for the fuel to be re-directed via the pressure control valve, is rapidly increased, so that the high pressure decreases again. The setpoint volumetric flow for the fuel to be re-directed is only reduced again after the internal combustion engine has reached its idling speed. This reduction in the setpoint volumetric flow is carried out as rapidly as the previous rapid increase in the setpoint volumetric flow, which is intended to limit the increase of the high pressure directly during the load reduction. However, this rapid, almost sudden reduction in the setpoint volumetric flow has the consequence that—in particular due to the inertia of the high-pressure control—the high pressure in the high-pressure accumulator increases abruptly, which allows the internal combustion engine to be unduly loaded, and wherein the emission behavior of the engine can significantly worsen due to the sudden large deviation of the actual high pressure from a setpoint high pressure.
The invention is based on the object of creating a method for operating an internal combustion engine, an injection system that is set up to perform such a method, and an internal combustion engine with such an injection system, wherein the aforementioned disadvantages are not encountered.
In particular, the object is achieved by developing the method described above so that a variation with time of the setpoint volumetric flow is detected and so that the setpoint volumetric flow is filtered, wherein a time constant for the filtering of the setpoint volumetric flow is selected depending on the recorded variation with time of the setpoint volumetric flow. The at least one pressure control valve is controlled with the filtered setpoint volumetric flow. As a result, it is possible to influence the dynamics of the variation with time of the setpoint volumetric flow depending on the present variation with time, so that in particular different time constants can be selected for different variations with time of the setpoint volumetric flow. In particular, the setpoint volumetric flow can be delayed, reduced or reversed, so that an excessive increase in the high pressure, which can result in a significant worsening of the emission behavior of the internal combustion engine and an undue load on the internal combustion engine, can be avoided. Furthermore, the variation with time of the setpoint volumetric flow can be rapid and in particular highly dynamic if this is necessary to protect the internal combustion engine from an undue load, in particular in order to prevent an unacceptable increase in the high pressure by rapidly increasing the setpoint volumetric flow. However, these high dynamics of the setpoint volumetric flow are no longer mandatory for any variation with time thereof but can rather be delayed for such events in which, for example, an excessively rapid reversal of the setpoint volumetric flow would result in an unacceptable high-pressure increase in the high-pressure storage tank. In this way, the internal combustion engine is protected from an unduly high load, and degraded emission behavior of the internal combustion engine can be effectively avoided at appropriate operating points or in the event of corresponding operating events. This results in a longer service life of the injection system and also of the internal combustion engine as a whole, as well as in globally improved emission behavior.
The injection system of the internal combustion engine comprises at least one first high-pressure pressure control valve as a further pressure control element. It is therefore possible according to one embodiment that the injection system comprises only one and exactly one high-pressure pressure control valve. However, according to a different design, it is also possible that the injection system comprises a plurality of high-pressure pressure control valves as further pressure control elements, wherein it may in particular comprise exactly two pressure control valves on the high-pressure side as further pressure control elements.
The injection system is specifically designed to inject fuel into at least one combustion chamber of the internal combustion engine, in particular for direct injection of fuel into at least one combustion chamber, and in particular for the injection of fuel into a plurality of combustion chambers of the internal combustion engine, in particular for direct injection of fuel into each combustion chamber of the plurality of combustion chambers.
The high-pressure accumulator system is preferably embodied as a common high-pressure accumulator, with which a plurality of injectors is in fluid connection. The individual injectors may be assigned in particular to different combustion chambers of the internal combustion engine for direct injection of fuel into the respective combustion chambers. Such a high-pressure accumulator is also referred to as a rail, wherein the injection system is preferably embodied as a common-rail injection system.
In particular, a volumetric fuel flow that can be conveyed from the fuel reservoir into the high-pressure accumulator can be adjusted via the suction throttle on the low-pressure side, so that the high pressure is controlled by the first high pressure control circuit by varying the amount of fuel fed to the high-pressure accumulator per unit of time. By means of the at least one high-pressure pressure control valve, fuel can be re-directed from the high-pressure accumulator into the fuel reservoir, so that the pressure control valve can be used in particular to prevent an unacceptable increase in the high pressure and/or to reduce the high pressure quickly.
According to a development of the invention, it is provided that a time derivative of the setpoint volumetric flow is calculated, wherein the time constant for the filtering applied to the setpoint volumetric flow is selected depending on the time derivative. In particular, by choosing the time constant depending on the time derivative, the dynamics of the setpoint volumetric flow can be influenced depending on its variation with time. Preferably, an averaged time derivative of the setpoint volumetric flow is calculated, wherein the time constant is selected depending on the averaged time derivative. This increases the reliability of the method, as the choice of time constant is then influenced by singular outliers to a lesser extent, wherein the general trend of the variation with time of the setpoint volumetric flow can be more precisely detected.
According to a development of the invention, it is provided that a first time constant is selected if the—preferably averaged—time derivative has a positive sign or is equal to zero, wherein a second time constant that is different from the first time constant is selected if the—preferably averaged—time derivative of the volumetric flow has a negative sign. The fact that the time derivative has a positive sign or is equal to zero means in particular that it is really positive or zero, is in particular greater than or equal to zero. The fact that the time derivative has a negative sign means in particular that it is really negative, i.e. less than zero. According to this design of the method, the choice of the time constant, i.e. the choice of a value for the time constant, can be made dependent on whether the setpoint volumetric flow increases or decreases. In this way, for an increase in the setpoint volumetric flow, another, preferably smaller time constant may be selected than for a decrease in the setpoint volumetric flow. Thus, it is possible that the setpoint volumetric flow can increase rapidly in order to avoid an unacceptable increase of the high pressure or to reduce the high pressure quickly, wherein on the other hand a reduction of the setpoint volumetric flow can be delayed in order to avoid an undue increase in the high pressure in the high-pressure accumulator in this case.
According to one development of the invention, it is provided that the first time constant is equal to zero. This advantageously allows filtering of the setpoint volumetric flow in the event of an increase thereof, which returns the same setpoint volumetric flow as the result, which thus has the same effect as if the setpoint volumetric flow is not filtered. This can therefore increase in a highly dynamic and non-delayed manner in order to rapidly remove fuel from the high-pressure accumulator and thus avoid an unacceptable increase in high pressure or reduce the high pressure rapidly. The second time constant is preferably greater than zero, i.e. especially truly positive. If the setpoint volumetric flow decreases, this decrease can therefore be due to the truly positive second time constant, wherein in particular the control of the pressure control valve in the closing direction is delayed. This can prevent or at least reduce an unacceptable increase in the high pressure when the setpoint volumetric flow is reversed.
According to one development of the invention, it is provided that the second time constant is from at least 0.1 seconds to a maximum of 1.1 seconds, preferably from at least 0.2 seconds to a maximum of 1 second. It has been found that these values are particularly suitable for the second time constant to avoid an unacceptable increase of the high pressure in the high-pressure accumulator by closing the pressure control valve.
According to one development of the invention, it is provided that the setpoint volumetric flow is filtered with a proportional filter with a delay element, in particular with a PT1 algorithm. This design has proven to be a particularly effective filtering of the setpoint volumetric flow in order to achieve the advantages mentioned here.
According to one development of the invention, it is provided that the high pressure is controlled in a first mode of operation of a protection mode using at least one pressure control valve by means of a second high pressure control circuit. This provides in particular a redundancy in the control of the high pressure, wherein even in the event of a failure of the first high pressure control circuit—in particular in the event of a failure of the suction throttle as the first pressure control element, for example due to a cable breakage, a forgotten plug-in of a suction throttle plug, clamping or contamination of the suction throttle, or another fault or defect in the first high pressure control circuit—control of the high pressure is still possible, namely via the second high pressure control circuit and by means of the at least one pressure control valve. A deterioration in the emission behavior of the internal combustion engine can thus be avoided.
Alternatively or additionally, it is preferably provided that in a second operating mode of the protection mode at least one second high-pressure pressure control valve, which is different from the at least one first high-pressure pressure control valve, is controlled in addition to the at least one first pressure control valve as a pressure control element for controlling the high pressure. The second pressure control valve is arranged in particular in relation to flow in parallel with the first pressure control valve, wherein both pressure control valves—in the parallel connection—connect the high-pressure accumulator to the fuel reservoir, and wherein fuel from the high-pressure accumulator can be re-directed into the fuel reservoir via both pressure control valves. Especially in operating situations in which at least one first pressure control valve is no longer sufficient for a functioning high-pressure control, so that the high pressure continues to increase despite the control of at least one first pressure control valve, it is then possible in the second operating mode of the protection operation to switch on at least one second pressure control valve, so that the pressure control valves are now controlled in common as pressure control elements for pressure control of the high pressure. This enables greater re-direction amounts to be achieved, so that efficient and safe pressure control is possible even with higher re-direction requirements. In this case, the at least one second pressure control valve is also preferably controlled by the second-high pressure control circuit—as well as the at least one first pressure control valve.
Alternatively or additionally, it is preferably provided that in a third operating mode of the protection mode, at least one pressure control valve is permanently opened. Particularly preferably, in the third operating mode of the protection mode all pressure control valves, in particular the at least one first pressure control valve and the at least one second pressure control valve, are permanently opened. In this third operating mode, a large volumetric fuel flow can be permanently re-directed from the high-pressure accumulator into the fuel reservoir via the pressure control valves. The pressure control valves are preferably controlled towards a maximum opening, so that a maximum volumetric fuel flow can be re-directed via the pressure control valves. As a result, an unacceptably high pressure in the high-pressure accumulator can be decreased not only temporarily, but permanently, quickly and reliably, so that the injection system is effectively and reliably protected. This functionality makes it possible, in particular, to dispense with a mechanical overpressure valve, so that space and costs can be saved. The functionality of the mechanical overpressure valve is simulated by the control of at least one pressure control valve in this case.
Preferably, the first operating mode of the protection mode is selected if the high pressure reaches or exceeds a first pressure limit value, or if a defect of the suction throttle is detected. Alternatively or additionally, the second protection mode is selected if the high pressure reaches or exceeds a second pressure limit value. Alternatively or additionally, the third operating mode of the protection mode is selected if the high pressure reaches or exceeds a third pressure limit value, or if a defect of a high pressure sensor is detected. The third pressure limit value is preferably chosen to be larger than the second pressure limit value. Preferably, the third pressure limit value is chosen to be greater than the first pressure limit value. Preferably, the second pressure limit value is chosen to be greater than the first pressure limit value. Particularly preferably, the second pressure limit value is chosen to be greater than the first pressure limit value, wherein the third pressure limit value is selected to be greater than the second pressure limit value. For example, it is possible that the first pressure limit value is selected at 2400 bar, wherein the third pressure limit value may be 2500 bar. The second pressure limit value is preferably selected between the first pressure limit value and the third pressure limit value.
In at least one operating mode of the protection mode, the suction throttle is preferably controlled to a permanently opened position. Preferably, the suction throttle is controlled to a permanently opened position in particular or only in the third operating mode of the protection mode. This allows sufficient fuel delivery into the high-pressure accumulator even when the at least one pressure control valve is permanently open, so that the internal combustion engine is not choked. The suction throttle is permanently opened in the third operating mode, especially in a kind of emergency operation, in order to ensure that even in the medium and low speed range of the internal combustion engine there is still enough fuel in the high-pressure accumulator in order to maintain the operation of the internal combustion engine.
The object is also achieved by creating an injection system for an internal combustion engine, which at least one injector, a high-pressure accumulator, which has a fluid connection on the one hand to at least one injector and on the other hand via a high-pressure pump to a fuel reservoir, wherein the high-pressure pump is assigned a suction throttle as the first pressure control element, and is created with a pressure control valve, via which the high-pressure accumulator system has a fluid connection to the fuel reservoir. The injection system comprises a control unit that has a working connection to at least one injector, the suction throttle and at least one pressure control valve. The control unit is set up to perform a method according to one of the embodiments described above. In particular, the advantages already explained in connection with the method are realized in connection with the injection system.
Preferably, the injection system comprises a plurality of injectors, wherein it comprises exactly one and only one high-pressure accumulator system, to which the various injectors are fluidically connected. In this case, the common high-pressure accumulator is formed as a so-called common rail, in particular as a rail, wherein the injection system is preferably embodied as a common-rail injection system.
The suction throttle is connected before the high-pressure pump, in particular in terms of flow, i.e. is arranged upstream of the high-pressure pump. It is possible that the suction throttle is integrated into the high-pressure pump or into a housing of the high-pressure pump. A low-pressure pump is preferably arranged upstream of the high-pressure pump and the suction throttle to convey fuel from the fuel reservoir to the suction throttle and the high-pressure pump.
A pressure sensor is preferably arranged on the high-pressure accumulator, which is used to detect a high pressure in the high-pressure accumulator and which has a working connection to the control unit, so that the high pressure can be registered in the control unit.
The control unit is preferably designed as an engine control unit (ECU) of the internal combustion engine. Alternatively, it is also possible that a separate control unit is provided specifically for carrying out the method.
An exemplary embodiment of the injection system is preferred, in which the pressure control valve is fully open. This design has the advantage that the pressure control valve opens to the maximum width when it is not controlled or energized, which enables particularly safe and reliable operation, especially when a mechanical overpressure valve is dispensed with. An unacceptable increase in the high pressure in the high-pressure accumulator can also be avoided if it is not possible to energize the pressure control valve due to a technical fault.
The object is finally achieved by creating an internal combustion engine that has an injection system according to a previously described initial example. The advantages already explained in connection with the injection system and the method arise in particular in connection with the internal combustion engine.
The invention is explained in more detail below on the basis of the drawing. In the figures:
According to an exemplary embodiment that is not illustrated of the internal combustion engine 1, it is possible that this comprises only the first and thus the only pressure control valve 19.
The injection system 3 in the exemplary embodiment shown here, however, comprises a second, in particular electrically controllable high-pressure pressure control valve 20, via which the high-pressure accumulator 13 is also fluidically connected to the fuel reservoir 7. The two pressure control valves 19, 20 are therefore arranged in particular in parallel with each other in terms of flow. A volumetric fuel flow that can be re-directed from the high-pressure accumulator 13 into the fuel reservoir can also be defined via the second pressure control valve 20. This volumetric fuel flow is designated in
The injection system 3 preferably does not comprise a mechanical overpressure valve, which is conventionally provided and then connects the high-pressure accumulator 1 to the fuel reservoir 7. The mechanical overpressure valve can be dispensed with, since its function is completely taken over by at least one pressure control valve 19, 20. However, it is also possible to design the injection system 3 with at least one mechanical overpressure valve, whereby an additional safety measure may be provided to avoid an unacceptable increase of the high pressure in the high-pressure accumulator system 13.
It is possible that the injection system 3 comprises more than two pressure control valves 19, 20. For a simpler presentation, however, the manner of operation of the injection system 1 is in particular explained below on the basis of the exemplary embodiment shown here, which comprises exactly two pressure control valves 19, 20.
The operating mode of the internal combustion engine 1 is determined by an electronic control unit 21, which is preferably designed as the engine control unit of the internal combustion engine 1, namely as a so-called Engine Control Unit (ECU). The electronic control unit 21 contains the usual components of a microcomputer system, such as a microprocessor, I/O modules, buffers and memory modules (EEPROM, RAM). In the memory modules, the operating data relevant for the operation of the internal combustion engine 1 are applied in characteristic fields/characteristic curves. The electronic control unit 21 calculates input variables and output variables from these. In
In
It is understood that in the previously described exemplary embodiment, in which the injection system 3 comprises only one pressure control valve 19, 20, also only one signal PWMDRV for controlling the pressure control valve is generated and output by the control unit 21. Also, this one signal PWMDRV is preferably formed as pulse-width modulated signal, by means of which the position of the pressure control valve 19, 20 and thus the volumetric fuel flow VDRV associated with the pressure control valve 19, 20 can be defined.
In
In
A second switching element 29 is provided, which is set up to switch the control of the pressure control valve 19 from a normal function to a standstill function and back. The second switching element 29 is controlled depending on a second logic signal Z or the value of a corresponding variable. The second switching element 29 may be designed as a virtual, in particular software-based, switching element, which switches between the normal function and the standstill function depending on the value of a variable designed in particular as a flag. Alternatively, it is also possible that the second switching element 29 can be used as a real switch, for example as a relay that switches depending on a signal value of an electrical signal. Here, the second logic signal Z specifically corresponds to a state variable, which can assume the value 1 for a first state and the value 2 for a second state. The normal function is set for the pressure control valve 19 when the second logic signal Z takes the value 2, wherein the standstill function is set when the second logic signal Z takes on the value 1. Of course, a different definition of the second logic signal Z is possible, in particular in such a way that a corresponding variable can assume the values 0 and 1.
First, control of the pressure control valve 19 in the normal mode is now described as well as in the case of the normal function. A calculation element 31 is provided, which outputs a calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber as the output variable, wherein the current speed nI, the setpoint injection quantity QS, moreover the setpoint high pressure pS preferably in a way that is not explicitly shown here, the dynamic rail pressure pdyn, and the actual high-pressure pI are entered into the calculation element 31 as input variables. The manner of operation of the calculation element 31 is described in detail in the German patent specifications DE 10 2009 031 528 B3 and DE 10 2009 031 527 B3. In particular, it can be shown that in a low load range, for example when the internal combustion engine 1 is idling, a positive value for a static setpoint volumetric flow is calculated, while in a normal operating range a static setpoint volumetric flow of 0 is calculated. The static setpoint volumetric flow is preferably corrected by adding up a dynamic setpoint volumetric flow, which in turn is calculated by means of a dynamic correction depending on the setpoint high pressure pS, the actual high pressure pI and the dynamic rail pressure pdyn. The calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber is finally the sum of the static setpoint volumetric flow and the dynamic setpoint volumetric flow. The calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS is a resultant setpoint volumetric flow in this respect.
In the normal mode, if the first logic signal SIG1 has the value “false”,—as first mentioned when ignoring function block B—the calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS is transferred unchanged as the setpoint volumetric flow VS to a pressure control valve characteristic field 33. Here the pressure control valve characteristic field 33—as described in the German patent specification DE 10 2009 031 528 B3—represents an inverse characteristic of the pressure control valve 19. The output variable of this pressure control valve characteristic field 33 is a pressure control valve setpoint current IS, wherein the input variables are the setpoint volumetric flow VS and the actual high pressure pI.
The pressure control valve setpoint current IS is fed to a current controller 35, which has the task of regulating the current for controlling the pressure control valve 19. Further input variables of the current controller 35 are, for example, a proportional coefficient kpI,DRV and an ohmic resistance RI,DRV of the pressure control valve 19. The output variable of the current controller 35 is a setpoint voltage US for the pressure control valve 19, which is converted in a known way by reference to an operating voltage UB into a duty cycle for the pulse-width modulated signal PWMDRV for controlling the pressure control valve 19 and is fed to this in the normal function, i.e. when the second logic signal Z has the value 2. For current control, the current to the pressure control valve 19 is measured as the measured current variable IR, is filtered in a current filter 37 and is fed back to the current controller 35 as a filtered actual current II.
As already indicated, the duty cycle PWMDRV of the pulse-width modeled signal for controlling the pressure control valve 19 is calculated from the setpoint voltage US and the operating voltage UB in a well-known manner according to the following equation:
PWMDRV=(US/UB)×100.
In this way, in the normal mode a high-pressure disturbance variable, namely the re-directed volumetric fuel flow VDRV, is generated via the pressure control valve 19 as the second pressure control element.
If the first logic signal SIG1 assumes the value “true”, the first switching element 27 switches from the normal mode to the first operating mode of the protection region. The conditions under which this is the case are explained in connection with
In this case, the setpoint volumetric flow VS is set identically to a limited output volumetric flow VR of a pressure control valve-pressure regulator 41. This corresponds to the upper switch position of the first switching element 27. The pressure control valve-pressure regulator 41 has a high-pressure control error ep as the input variable, which is calculated as the difference of the setpoint high pressure pS and the actual high pressure pI. Further input variables of the pressure control valve-pressure regulator 41 are preferably a maximum volumetric flow Vmax for the pressure control valve 19, the setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber calculated in the calculation element 31 considering the function block B, and/or a proportional coefficient kpDRV. The pressure control valve-pressure regulator 41 is preferably implemented as a PI(DT1) algorithm. In this case, preferably an integrating part (I-part) is initialized with the calculated setpoint volume current VS ignoring function block B at the time at which the first switching element 27 is switched from its lower switch position shown in
Control of the pressure control valve 19 as a pressure control element is thus carried out in this way in the first operating mode of the protection mode for controlling the high pressure in the high-pressure accumulator 13 by means of the second high pressure control circuit 39.
On the basis of
As will be explained in more detail in connection with
A fourth switching element 44 is provided, which determines the value of a factor fDRV. This fourth switching element 44 is also controlled depending on the third logic signal SIG2 and adopts its lower switching position shown in
It is possible, moreover, that the same characteristic curve 43, and thus in particular only one characteristic curve 43, is used for both pressure control valves 19, 20 if the pressure control valves 19, 20 are of identical form. If the pressure control valves 19, 20 are of different forms, different characteristic curves 43 are preferably used for the different pressure control valves 19,20.
If the dynamic rail pressure pdyn increases and reaches or exceeds the second pressure limit pG2, the third logic signal SIG2 assumes the value “true”. This causes the third switching element 47 and the fourth switching element 44 to change into their upper switching position in
Two identical pressure control valves 19, 20 can re-direct twice the fuel intake compared to a single pressure control valve 19, 20. For this reason—now considering the fourth switching element 44—the factor fDRV now assumes the value 2, which causes the maximum volumetric flow Vmax resulting from the characteristic curve 43 to be doubled. On the other hand, the limited volumetric flow VR that results from the limiting element 45 is divided by the factor fDRV and thus now by two, since ultimately the resulting pressure control valve setpoint volumetric flow VS corresponds to a pressure control valve 19, 20 and is used respectively for the control of a pressure control valve 19, 20. This procedure is also adapted to the preferred embodiment, in which the two pressure control valves 19, 20 used are of the same form. If they are of different forms, on the other hand, preferably different characteristic curves 43, different second high-pressure control circuits 39, and different pressure control valve characteristic fields 33, 49 are used for controlling the different pressure control valves 19, 20. If, on the other hand, more than two pressure control valves 19, 20 of the same form are provided, these can be controlled completely analogously to the representation in
The second pressure control valve setpoint current IS,2 is the input variable of a second current controller 51, which is otherwise preferably the same as the first current controller 35. Also, the controller for generating the second control signal PWMDRV2 corresponds to that for the generation of the first control signal PWMDRV1 and of the single control signal PWMDRV according to
Using the second switching element 29 and the fifth switching element 53, it is apparent that
The two control signals PWMDRV1, PWMDRV2 are preferably not fed directly to the pressure control valves 19, 20, but to a switching logic 57, which ensures that the pressure control valves 19, 20 are alternately controlled with the control signals PWMDRV1, PWMDRV2. Similarly, the measured current variables IR, IR,2 are preferably also taken from the switching logic 57, wherein this ensures that they are always measured on the respective pressure control valves 19, 20 correctly assigned to the control signals PWMDRV1, PWMDRV2 to ensure defined control of each of the pressure control valves 19, 20 by means of the current controllers 35, 51. By means of the switching logic 57, the load on the pressure control valves 19, 20 can be standardized in an advantageous manner, so that in particular none of the pressure control valves 19, 20 is controlled much more frequently than the other.
This is shown below first using
In
This shows that this fully corresponds to the logic for switching the first logic signal SIG1, excepting only that the second pressure limit pG2 is used as the input variable instead of the first pressure limit pG1. The corresponding logic switching components are provided with cancelled reference characters here in comparison with
With reference to
Returning to
If, on the other hand, the second logic signal Z has a value of 2, then—as already explained—the normal function is set for the pressure control valves 19, 20 and these are controlled with their respective setpoint currents IS, IS,2 and the control signals PWMDRV, PWMDRV1, PWMDRV2 calculated therefrom.
The pressure control valves 19, 20 are preferably designed in such a way that they are closed when unpressurized and deenergized, wherein they are further preferably embodied so that they are closed under an inlet-side pressure up to an opening pressure value, wherein they open when the inlet-side pressure reaches or exceeds the opening pressure value in the deenergized state. They are thus normally open when under input pressure and can be controlled towards the closed state by energizing. The opening pressure value may be 850 bar, for example.
In
The following functionality results: If the internal combustion engine 1 starts, there is initially no high pressure in the high-pressure accumulator 13, and the pressure control valves 19, 20 are arranged in their standstill function, so that they are pressureless and deenergized, i.e. closed. When the internal combustion engine 1 runs up, therefore, a high pressure can quickly build up in the high-pressure accumulator, which at some point exceeds the starting value pStart. This is preferably lower than the opening pressure value of the pressure control valves 19, 20, so that the normal function is first set for the valves 19, 20 before they open. This ensures in an advantageous way that the pressure control valves 19, 20 are controlled in any case when they open for the first time. Since they are closed when not pressurized, they remain closed even under control until the actual high pressure pI also exceeds the opening pressure value, wherein they are then opened and controlled in the normal function, namely either in the normal mode or in the first operating mode of the protection mode.
However, if one of the cases described above occurs, the standstill function is again set for the pressure control valves 19, 20.
This is particularly the case when the dynamic rail pressure pdyn exceeds the third pressure limit pG3, wherein this is preferably greater than the first pressure limit pG1 and the second pressure limit pG2, and in particular has a value at which a mechanical overpressure valve would open in a conventional design of the injection system. Since the pressure control valves 19, 20 are normally open under pressure, they open completely in the standstill function in this case and thus safely and reliably fulfil the function of an overpressure valve.
The transition from the normal function to the standstill function also occurs when a defect is detected in the high pressure sensor 23. If there is a defect, the high pressure in the high-pressure accumulator 13 can no longer be controlled. In order to be able to operate the internal combustion engine 1 safely, the transition from the normal function to the standstill function for the pressure control valves 19, 20 is caused, so that they open and thus prevent an unacceptable increase of the high pressure.
Furthermore, the transition from the normal function to the standstill function takes place in a case in which a standstill of the internal combustion engine 1 is detected. This corresponds to a reset of the pressure control valves 19, 20, so that when the internal combustion engine 1 is restarted, the cycle described here can start again.
If the standstill function is set for the pressure control valves 19, 20 under pressure in the high-pressure accumulator 13, the valves are open to the maximum extent and re-direct a maximum volumetric flow from the high-pressure accumulator 13 into the fuel reservoir 7. This corresponds to a protective function for the internal combustion engine 1 and the injection system 3, wherein in particular this protective function can replace the lack of a mechanical overpressure valve.
It is important here that the pressure control valves 19, 20 have only two functional states, namely the standstill function and the normal function, wherein these two functional states are fully sufficient to cover the entire relevant functionality of the pressure control valves 19, 20 including the protective function for replacing a mechanical overpressure valve.
It turns out that even after exceeding the second pressure limit value pG2, stable control of the high pressure by means of the pressure control valves is still possible, since the conveying capacity of the high-pressure pump 11 depends on the speed. In this case, engine operating values, especially emission values, can still be complied with. Only in the higher speed range must the third pressure limit value pG3 be expected to be exceeded. In this case, the pressure control valves 19, 20 open completely and a deterioration in engine operating values, especially emissions, must be expected. At least stable operation of the engine is then still guaranteed.
Even in the event of a failure of the high pressure sensor 23, stable engine operation is still possible, even if in this case a deterioration of the engine operating values occurs, in particular the emission values.
The fact that the second pressure limit PG2 is greater than the first pressure limit pG1 avoids both pressure control valves 19, 20 simultaneously transitioning from the closed state to an open state. In this way, large pressure gradients that could have a harmful effect on the injection system 3 are avoided.
The manner of operation of function block B is explained below with reference to
In the event of a reduction of the load on the internal combustion engine 1, in particular in the event of a sudden complete load reduction from a full load state, the high pressure in the high-pressure accumulator 13 first increases, since the amount of fuel to be injected into the combustion chambers 16 of the internal combustion engine 1 is quickly reduced, wherein the high-pressure controller only responds with a delay. At the same time as the load is reduced, a setpoint speed is typically reduced to an idling speed, especially in the form of a ramp. The current engine speed nI initially overshoots and finally approaches the setpoint speed from above. The setpoint injection quantity QS decreases very quickly—especially to zero—with the increase of the engine speed nI in the form of the overshoot after the load reduction. If the setpoint injection quantity QS falls to very small values, the setpoint volumetric flow Vs,ber calculated by the calculation element 31 increases again quickly—in particular up to a maximum value of preferably 2 l/min. If the engine speed nI then falls below the setpoint speed, a positive speed control error results. This causes the setpoint injection quantity QS to increase again. An increasing setpoint injection quantity QS in turn leads to a decrease of the calculated setpoint volumetric flow Vs,ber, in particular to the value 0 1/min. If this occurs very quickly, the associated very fast reversal of the volumetric fuel flow VDRV, which is re-directed in the normal mode via the pressure control valve 19, leads to a significant abrupt increase in the actual high pressure pI, for example by about 500 bar. A very rapid reduction of the volumetric fuel flow VDRV re-directed via the pressure control valve 19 thus leads to a sudden sharp increase in the actual high pressure pI. As a result, the internal combustion engine 1 can be subjected to unduly heavy loads on the one hand, and on the other hand the engine's emission behavior deteriorates due to the large deviation from the setpoint high pressure pS. While a rapid increase of the setpoint volumetric flow VS that is used in the normal mode to control the pressure control valve 19 is desired in the case of an excessively high actual high pressure pI, a similarly dynamic decrease of the setpoint volumetric flow VS is undesirable for the reasons explained above. According to
In order to solve the previously described problem, an embodiment according to the invention of the method for operating the internal combustion engine 1 with the injection system 3 and the high-pressure accumulator 13 provides that the high pressure in the high-pressure accumulator 13 is controlled via the low-pressure suction throttle 9 as the first pressure control element in the first high-pressure control circuit, wherein in the normal mode the high-pressure disturbance variable VDRV is generated via at least one first pressure control valve 19 on the high pressure side as a further pressure control element which re-directs fuel from the high-pressure accumulator 13 into the fuel reservoir 7, wherein the pressure control valve 19 is controlled in the normal mode on the basis of the setpoint volumetric flow VS for the fuel to be re-directed, wherein a variation with time of the setpoint volumetric flow is detected, wherein the setpoint volumetric flow is filtered, wherein a time constant for the filtering of the setpoint volumetric flow is selected depending on the detected variation with time of the setpoint volumetric flow.
In particular, the variation with time of the calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber is detected in function block B, and this is filtered with a time constant that depends on the detected variation with time. For this purpose, function block B comprises a volumetric flow filter 65, into which the calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber is input. Furthermore, a time constant TV for filtering the calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber is input to the setpoint volumetric flow filter 65.
The setpoint volumetric flow filter 65 is preferably embodied as a proportional filter with a delay element, in particular as a PT1 filter, the transmission function of which is in particular:
G(s)=1/(1+TVs).
The time constant Tv is freely selectable.
A sixth switching element 67 determines the value that the time constant TV adopts depending on a fourth logic signal SIG4. If the value of the fourth logic signal SIG4 is “true” (T), the sixth switching element 67 adopts its left switch position shown in
The value of the fourth logic signal SIG4 is determined by calculating a—preferably averaged—time derivative of the calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber in a differentiating element 69, wherein the time constant TV is thus selected depending on the preferably averaged time derivative.
For this purpose, the preferably averaged time derivative as the output variable of the differentiating element 69 is fed to a second comparator element 71, which besides the time derivative determined by the differentiating element 69 also has the constant value zero as an input variable. The preferably averaged time derivative of the setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber is therefore compared in the second comparator element 71 in particular with zero. The second comparator element 71 has the fourth logic signal SIG4 as the output variable. This assumes the value “true” if the time derivative resulting from the differentiating element 69 is greater than or equal to zero. It assumes the value “false” if the time derivative resulting from the differentiating element 69 is less than zero.
Therefore, the first value T1V is selected for the time constant TV if the time derivative has a positive sign or is equal to zero, wherein the second value T2V is selected for the time constant TV if the time derivative has a negative sign.
The values T1V, T2V for the time constant TV are now selected in particular in such a way that the variation with time of the setpoint volumetric flow VS is delayed when it decreases, wherein at the same time it is not delayed or is only slightly delayed when the setpoint volumetric flow VS and in particular the calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber increases. For this purpose, the first value T1V is preferably selected as zero, wherein the second value T2V is preferably greater than zero, so it is really chosen as positive. Thus, there are different values for the time constant TV for increasing and decreasing setpoint volumetric flow VS, wherein the decreasing setpoint volumetric flow VS is delayed in time, wherein an increasing setpoint volumetric flow VS is not delayed in time as far as possible. The second value T2V is preferably selected from at least 0.1 s to a maximum of 1.1 s, preferably from at least 0.2 s to a maximum of 1 s.
From the setpoint volumetric flow filter 65 and thus from the function block B, a filtered setpoint volumetric flow VS,gef results, which in the normal mode is set equal to the setpoint volumetric flow VS. This filtered setpoint volumetric flow VS,gef is preferably also fed to the pressure control valve-pressure regulator 41 as an input variable.
The manner of operation of the function block B for the exemplary embodiment of the injection system 3 with two pressure control valves 19, 20 according to
A particularly advantageous calculation of an average gradient GradientMittelV as an averaged time derivative of the calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber of the calculation element 31 is described: a current gradient GradientAktuellV(t1) of the calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber at time t1 is calculated by subtracting the value VS,ber(t1−ΔtGradV), which precedes the current value by the time span ΔtGradV, from the current value VS,ber(t1) and dividing the difference by the time span ΔtGradV. The gradient at time (t1−Ta), wherein Ta denotes a sample time, is calculated in that the value VS,ber(t1−ΔtGradV−Ta), which precedes the current value by the time span ΔtGradV, is subtracted from the value VS,ber(t1−Ta) and the difference is also divided by the time span ΔtGradV. Entirely generally, the gradient of the setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber at time (t1−(k−1)Ta) is calculated by subtracting the value VS,ber(t1−ΔtGradV−(k−1)Ta), which precedes the current value by the time span ΔtGradV, from the value VS,ber(t1−(k−1)Ta) and dividing the difference by the time span ΔtGradV.
It is an advantageous embodiment of the calculation of the average gradient if this is averaged over a predeterminable period of time ΔtMittelV. For a sampling time Ta, the averaged gradient GradientMittel(t1) results at time t1 by averaging over a total of k gradients, wherein the number k is calculated as follows:
k=ΔtMittelV/Ta.
A second timing diagram at b) shows the setpoint injection quantity QS. Up to the first time t1, the setpoint injection quantity QS is identical to the constant value QStart. Since the actual engine speed nI then increases above the setpoint engine speed nS, the setpoint injection quantity QS subsequently decreases. At a second time t2, the setpoint injection quantity QS reaches the value 10 mm3/stroke and at a third time t3 reaches the value 2 mm3/stroke. Since the actual engine speed nI runs above the setpoint engine speed nS from then on, the setpoint injection quantity QS falls to the value 0 mm3/stroke and remains at this value until the actual engine speed nI falls below the setpoint engine speed nS. If this is the case, the setpoint injection quantity QS increases again and reaches the value 2 mm3/stroke again at a fifth time t5. At a sixth time t6, the setpoint injection quantity QS again reaches the value 10 mm3/stroke, and at a seventh Time t7, this has settled at an idling injection setpoint quantity QLeer.
A third timing diagram at c) shows the calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber as a solid line, and the filtered setpoint volumetric flow VS,gef as a dashed line. For example, the calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber is identical to 0 l/min when the setpoint injection quantity QS is greater than or equal to 10 mm3/stroke. As a result, both VS,ber and VS,gef are identical to 0 1/min up to the second time t2. From the second time t2 to the third time t3, the setpoint injection quantity QS falls from the value 10 mm3/stroke to the value 2 mm3/stroke. This causes the calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber e to rise from the value 0 l/min to the value 2 l/min. As the first value T1V for the time constant TV is identical to 0 s for increasing setpoint volumetric flow, the input variable VS,ber of the setpoint volumetric flow filter 65 is not delayed and is thus identical to the output variable VS,gef of the setpoint volumetric flow filter 65. From the third time t3 to the fifth time t5, the setpoint injection quantity QS is less than or equal to 2 mm3/stroke. This results in a constant input variable VS,ber of the setpoint volumetric flow filter 65 of 2 1/min. Since the time constant TV is also identical to 0 s in this case, the output variable VS,gef of the setpoint volumetric flow filter 65 is also identical in this case to the input variable VS,ber of the setpoint volumetric flow filter 65 and is thus constant at 2 1/min. From the fifth time t5 to the sixth time t6, the setpoint injection quantity QS increases from 2 mm3/stroke to 10 mm3/stroke. Subsequently, the setpoint injection quantity QS continues to increase and finally settles at the idling setpoint injection quantity QLeer. The input variable VS,ber of the setpoint volumetric flow filter 65 thus drops from the value 2 1/min to the value 0 1/min from the fifth time t5 to the sixth time t6. VS,ber then remains at the value 0 1/min. Since the second value T2V for the time constant TV for the decreasing pressure control valve setpoint volumetric flow is greater than 0 s and typically adopts values from 0.2 to 1 s, the output variable VS,gef of the setpoint volumetric flow filter 65 drops from the fifth time t5 with a time delay and finally approaches the input variable VS,ber of the volumetric flow filter 65 and thus the value 0 1/min. This is represented in the form of a dashed line.
A fourth timing diagram at d) shows the setpoint high pressure pS as a solid line. This is identical to a starting value pStart until the first time t1. After the first time t1, the setpoint high pressure pS drops and finally settles at an idle value pLeer at the seventh time t7. A dotted line shows the course of the actual high pressure pI without the function block B. From the first time t1, the actual high pressure pI initially increases and subsequently approaches the setpoint high pressure pSoll due to the re-direction of fuel using the pressure control valve 19, 20. At the fifth time t5 there is a significant increase in the actual high pressure pI. This is due to the reversal of the fuel that is to be re-directed via the pressure control valve 19, 20. At first, the actual high pressure pI rises very quickly to a first maximum value pI. Subsequently, the actual high pressure pI slowly approaches the setpoint high pressure pS again and is identical to this at a ninth time t9. The lack of a fuel re-direction amount is responsible for the slower decrease of the actual high pressure pI. The course of the actual high pressure pI,gef when using function block B is shown dashed. Since, when selecting a first value, T1V of the time constant TV of 0 s, this effect only occurs if the input variable VS,ber of the setpoint volumetric flow filter 65 decreases, this effect only takes place from the fifth time t5. Since the filtering leads to the setpoint volumetric flow VS to be re-directed falling more slowly, there is only a small increase in the actual high pressure pI,gef. In this case, a second maximum value p2 is reached. In addition, the actual high pressure pI,gef is already settled at the setpoint high pressure pS sooner, at an eighth time t8. The filtering thus makes it possible to reduce the increase of the actual high pressure pI by the difference value Δp. In practice, Δp is 300 to 400 bar.
The method is started in a first step S1. In a second step S2, the calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber is calculated by the calculation element 31. In a third step S3, a current time derivative of the calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber is calculated. In a fourth step S4, an averaged time derivative of the calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber is calculated. In a fifth step S5, a check is made as to whether the averaged time derivative is greater than or equal to zero. If this is the case, the first value T1V is assigned to the time constant TV in a sixth step S6. If this is not the case, the second value T2V is assigned to the time constant TV in a seventh step S7. In an eighth step S8, the calculated setpoint volumetric flow VS,ber is filtered by the setpoint volumetric flow filter 65 with the time constant TV, resulting in the filtered setpoint volumetric flow VS,gef. The method ends in a ninth step S9. The method is preferably carried out continuously, at least in the normal mode permanently during the operation of the internal combustion engine 1. It therefore starts again, especially in the first step S1, when it is in the ninth Step S9.
The invention has the following advantages:
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2017 214 001.1 | Aug 2017 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2018/071435 | 8/7/2018 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2019/030245 | 2/14/2019 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9249753 | Viereck | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9441572 | Dolker | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9556840 | Dölker | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 20080103674 | Kosiedowski | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20140081552 | Nieddu | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20170067409 | Dölker | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20180023502 | Dolker | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 10112702 | Oct 2002 | DE |
| 102010043755 | May 2012 | DE |
| 102012019457 | Mar 2014 | DE |
| 102014213648 | Oct 2015 | DE |
