1. Field of the Disclosure
This disclosure relates to an apparatus and method that optimizes feedable sheet availability in a feed tray of a feeder module.
2. Description of Related Art
As shown in FIG. 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,906 B2, the contents of which are included herein by reference, feeding of media sheets in present day copiers and printers include a scheduler and media sheet source, as well as, a marking engine and media sheet stacker. In a marking engine, such as a xerographic marking engine, a photoconductive insulating member is charged to a uniform potential and thereafter exposed to a light image of an original document to be reproduced. The exposure discharges the photoconductive insulating surface in exposed or background areas and creates an electrostatic latent image on the member, which corresponds to the image areas contained within a document. Subsequently, the electrostatic latent image on the photoconductive insulating surface is made visible by developing the image with a developing material. Generally, the developing material comprises toner particles adhering triboelectrically to carrier granules. The developed image is subsequently transferred to a sheet of media, such as a sheet of paper, a transparency, or other sheet of media, that is fed from a media sheet source. A stacker can then stack the marked media sheets. A scheduler can schedule feed commitments for a number of sheets to be fed by the media source, marked by the marking engine, and stacked by the stacker. For example, the scheduler can inform each element that a certain number of sheets will be processed by the elements. As one of the scheduled elements, a media sheet source must plan and commit to a variable number of feed commitments.
Unfortunately, feedable capacity of the media sheet source may not be sufficient to satisfy outstanding feed commitments scheduled by the scheduler. For example, the media sheet source fed tray may not contain enough media sheets to meet the outstanding feed commitments. An unscheduled shutdown or jam can result from the media sheet source attempting to feed sheets after the feed tray is empty. Attempting to feed sheets after the feed tray is empty can also result in damage to the media sheet source. Furthermore, other elements, such as, the marking engine and the stacker can be damaged if they attempt to process scheduled, but unfed sheets. This can occur when a media sheet source cannot adequately control its feed commitments based on it feedable capacity and will stop feeding sheets even though the feed tray is not empty.
Additionally, due to the scheduling mechanism applied in a current machine, it is possible for the print engine to schedule as many as 50 sheets ahead. In order to compensate for this without declaring a fault, the feeder tray must declare low paper early enough to compensate for these outstanding commitments. Currently, as disclosed in heretofore mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,906 B2, this is done based on an assumption of average sheet thickness and number of outstanding commitments. When this approach results in an early declaration of low paper, more paper is left in the feeder tray. When the low paper declaration occurs too late, the feeder tray can reach its upper travel limit, and misfeeds can occur.
Thus, there is still a need for a method and apparatus that can reliably control feed commitments.
Accordingly, in answer to the above-mentioned problems, disclosed herein is a method and apparatus that adjusts the step count at which a tray low paper condition is declared based on the number of outstanding feed commitments and the average number of feeds between tray increments (or lifts) in order to prevent a premature tray low paper condition. After a first tray increment has occurred, feeder software waits a pre-determined number of additional tray increments, and will then calculate the average number of feeds between increments. Using this average and the number of outstanding feed commitments the low paper condition is declared when a predetermined logical test is true.
The disclosed reprographic system that incorporates the disclosed improved system for stream feeding sheets for multiple jobs from a feed tray may be operated by and controlled by appropriate operation of conventional control systems. It is well-known and preferable to program and execute imaging, printing, paper handling, and other control functions and logic with software instructions for conventional or general purpose microprocessors, as taught by numerous prior patents and commercial products. Such programming or software may, of course, vary depending on the particular functions, software type, and microprocessor or other computer system utilized, but will be available to, or readily programmable without undue experimentation from, functional descriptions, such as, those provided herein, and/or prior knowledge of functions which are conventional, together with general knowledge in the software of computer arts. Alternatively, any disclosed control system or method may be implemented partially or fully in hardware, using standard logic circuits or single chip VLSI designs.
As to specific components of the subject apparatus or methods, or alternatives therefor, it will be appreciated that, as normally the case, some such components are known per se' in other apparatus or applications, which may be additionally or alternatively used herein, including those from art cited herein. For example, it will be appreciated by respective engineers and others that many of the particular components mountings, component actuations, or component drive systems illustrated herein are merely exemplary, and that the same novel motions and functions can be provided by many other known or readily available alternatives. All cited references, and their references, are incorporated by reference herein where appropriate for teachings of additional or alternative details, features, and/or technical background. What is well known to those skilled in the art need not be described herein.
Various of the above-mentioned and further features and advantages will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the specific apparatus and its operation or methods described in the example(s) below, and the claims. Thus, they will be better understood from this description of these specific embodiment(s), including the drawing figures (which are approximately to scale) wherein:
While the present disclosure will hereinafter be described in connection with a preferred embodiment, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the disclosure to that embodiment. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
As in other xerographic machines, and as is well known, printer 10 in
Subsequently, charger 22 charges the area of belt 14 to a relatively high, substantially uniform potential. Next, the charged area of belt 14 passes laser 24 to expose selected areas of belt 14 to a pattern of light, to discharge selected areas to produce an electrostatic latent image. Next, the illuminated area of the belt passes developer unit Y, which deposits yellow toner on charged areas of the belt.
Subsequently, charger 26 charges the area of belt 14 to a relatively high, substantially uniform potential. Next, the charged area of belt 14 passes laser 28 to expose selected areas of belt 14 to a pattern of light, to discharge selected areas to produce an electrostatic latent image. Next, the illuminated area of the belt passes developer unit C, which deposits cyan toner on charged areas of the belt.
Subsequently, charger 30 charges the area of belt 14 to a relatively high, substantially uniform potential. Next, the charged area of belt 14 passes laser 32 to expose selected areas of belt 14 to a pattern of light, to discharge selected areas to produce an electrostatic latent image. Next, the illuminated area of the belt passes developer unit K, which deposits black toner on charged areas of the belt.
As a result of the processing described above, a full color toner image is now moving on belt 14. In synchronism with the movement of the image on belt 14, a conventional registration system receives copy sheets from sheet feeder module 100 brings the copy sheets into contact with the image on belt 14. Sheet feeder module 100 includes high capacity feeders 102 and 104 with each including a feed head 110 which feed sheets from sheet stacks 106 and 108 positioned on media supply trays 107 and 109 into imaging or marking module 12. Additional high capacity media trays could be added to feed sheets along sheet path 120, if desired.
Conventional air fluffers 112 and 114 are added to high capacity feeders 102 and 104 in order to aid in separating the top sheet in stacks 106 and 108 from the remaining sheets and are turned ON after the stack height of each tray has been raised to a predetermined or highest position.
A corotron 34 charges a sheet to tack the sheet to belt 14 and to move the toner from belt 14 to the sheet. Subsequently, detack corotron 36 charges the sheet to an opposite polarity to detack the sheet from belt 14. Prefuser transport 38 moves the sheet to fuser E, which permanently affixes the toner to the sheet with heat and pressure. The sheet then advances to stacker module F, or to duplex loop D.
Cleaner 40 removes toner that may remain on the image area of belt 14. In order to complete duplex copying, duplex loop D feeds sheets back for transfer of a toner powder image to the opposed sides of the sheets. Duplex inverter 90, in duplex loop D, inverts the sheet such that what was the top face of the sheet, on the previous pass through transfer, will be the bottom face on the sheet, on the next pass through transfer. Duplex inverter 90 inverts each sheet such that what was the leading edge of the sheet, on the previous pass through transfer, will be the trailing on the sheet, on the next pass through transfer.
With further reference to
That is, a low paper condition is declared if the current step count is greater than the low paper step count minus the number of outstanding commitments divided by the number of sheets per increment times the steps per increment.
Air nozzles or fluffers 112 and 114 of high capacity feeders 102 and 104, respectively, are turned ON after the maximum stack height is initially reached and it is important to wait until the first increment has occurred before calculating the sheets per index. Using this method, the “Low Paper Step Count” can be set to the topmost tray position that can be reliably reached without hardware damage. Declaration of the low paper condition will now automatically adjust for the media being fed and will be updated real-time based on the outstanding feed commitments.
In recapitulation, a scheduling method and apparatus is disclosed that facilitates the scheduling of as many as 50 sheets ahead for multiple jobs without declaring a break in feeding and comprises adjusting the step count at which a tray lower paper condition is declared based on the number of outstanding feed commitments and the average number of feeds between tray increments. After the first tray increment has occurred, a wait of a pre-determined number of additional tray increments is accomplished, and then the average number of feeds between increments is calculated. Using this average and the number of outstanding feed commitments the low paper condition is declared. A benefit of this improved scheduling method and apparatus include the ability to automatically adjust the feeder low paper condition according to the media being fed, which has added as much as 25 mm of additional feedable capacity to the feed trays.
The claims, as originally presented and as they may be amended, encompass variations, alternatives, modifications, improvements, equivalents, and substantial equivalents of the embodiments and teachings disclosed herein, including those that are presently unforeseen or unappreciated, and that, for example, may arise from applicants/patentees and others. Unless specifically recited in a claim, steps or components of claims should not be implied or imported from the specification or any other claims as to any particular order, number, position, size, shape, angle, color, or material.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5853171 | Halpenny | Dec 1998 | A |
5984299 | Hirota et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6308951 | Allmendinger et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
7177554 | Van Vliembergen | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7900906 | Roberts et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20030015836 | Westcott et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040061280 | Sciurba et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20070096387 | Sciurba et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20090166950 | Sciurba et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090261524 | Nakayama et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100327514 | Sciurba et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120286465 | Ooba | Nov 2012 | A1 |