This application is a National Phase filing under 35 U.S.C. §371 of PCT/SE2011/000047 filed on Mar. 10, 2011; and this application claims priority to Application No. 1000245-9 filed in Sweden on Mar. 18, 2010 under 35 U.S.C. §119; the entire contents of all are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to a method for packing fin-stabilized penetrators in a carrier shell or missile for subsequent release in a combat situation.
The invention is especially intended for packing fin-stabilized projectiles, also referred to as penetrators, in a carrier shell, which penetrators at a later stage, after the shell has been fired from a launcher, are released from the carrier shell for combat against a combatable unit, for example an enemy shell or missile. By combatable unit is also meant air, water or ground vehicles etc., whereby, according to the invention, the penetrators are arranged in a rotationally stable carrier shell or missile in a manner which allows rapid and effective release of the penetrators in combat against the said combatable unit.
Many different, more or less complicated methods for the packing of penetrators have been tried. For example, methods in which the penetrators are packed in a carrier shell by bundling with tape or sleeve joints, wherein the penetrators, after the carrier shell has been fired from a launcher, are released from the carrier shell by the joint being mechanically broken or by the penetrators being able to slide out of the joint.
US 2008/0307994 describes a packing device in which penetrators are packed in a cylindrical combat part in a carrier shell. The cylindrical combat part comprises openable segments arranged around the penetrators. The segments, which are held together with tapes, are opened by breaking of the tapes, whereupon penetrators are released from the combat part.
The tapes are strong enough to hold the segments in place during firing and flight of the carrier shell, but are broken upon activation of a breaking device. Joints which are broken mechanically give rise to problems with the penetrators, which is manifested by variations in speed and direction of the penetrators. In extreme cases, the problems lead to penetrators colliding with one another.
US 2005/0066840 A1 describes a packing method for penetrators whose rear parts, comprising radially protruding fins, are configured with a smaller diameter than the front parts of the penetrators. The smaller diameter allows a denser packing of the penetrators, since the penetrators fill part of the empty spaces between the penetrators. However, the problem with protruding fins on the outer penetrators remains, which means an empty space between the penetrators and the enclosing casing. Different diameters between the front and rear parts of the penetrators also means a more complex construction.
A further problem with the abovementioned packing methods in which the penetrators are packed side by side is the acceleration load which acts upon the fins of the penetrators as the carrier shell is fired, which can lead to problems with the penetrators when released from the carrier shell.
A main object of the present invention is an improved method for packing fin-stabilized penetrators in a carrier shell, so that the empty space between the penetrators is reduced and so that problems with the penetrators upon their release from the carrier shell are reduced.
The said objects, as well as other objects which are not enumerated here, are satisfactorily met by that which is stated in the present independent patent claims.
Embodiments of the invention are defined in the dependent patent claims.
Thus, according to the present invention, an improved packing method for packing fin-stabilized penetrators in a carrier shell has been provided, which penetrators comprise a front penetrator part and a rear fin part comprising fin sides, so that the empty space between the penetrators and problems with the penetrators upon the release of the penetrators from the carrier shell are minimized.
The packing method is characterized in that the rear fin parts of the penetrators are made shorter than the front penetrator parts of the penetrators, and in that the front penetrator parts are made cylindrical for the distribution of load stresses rearwards, relative to the direction of firing of the carrier shell, from the centrally located penetrator via the front penetrator parts of the flanking penetrators, whereby the fins are wholly relieved of load apart from the bottommost layer of penetrators closest to the rear part of the carrier shell.
According to further aspects of the packing method, according to the invention:
According to the present invention, a carrier shell comprising fin-stabilized penetrators packed with the said packing method has also been provided.
The invention yields a number of advantages and effects.
Configuration of the sides of the fin part so that the shape of the sides corresponds to the shape of the front penetrator part allows an effective dense packing of penetrators, resulting in minimal empty space.
An important effect of the invention is that the loads upon the fins of the penetrators during firing are reduced, which leads to fewer problems with the penetrators upon their release from the carrier shell. Packing of the front parts of penetrators against the fin part of a centrally located penetrator means that the acceleration load, during firing, travels exclusively via the front penetrator parts, whereby the fins are wholly relieved of load apart from the bottommost layer of penetrators closest to the rear part of the casing, where load is relieved via finless cylinders or via the casing.
The more effective dense packing makes shells of lower weight, volume and cost possible.
Configuration of the fin part of the penetrator as a separate component simplifies the change of fins when damage has occurred.
The fact that the fin part is a separate component which can be stored separately from the penetrator makes the theft of complete penetrators more difficult.
The invention also means greater flexibility, since different fins can be chosen for the penetrator.
The basic concept behind the invention is thus a method and a device for packing penetrators in a carrier shell so that the empty space between the penetrators is reduced and so that problems with the penetrators upon their release from the carrier shell are reduced.
The invention has been defined in the following patent claims and shall now be described in somewhat greater detail in connection with the appended figures.
Further advantages and effects will emerge from a study and consideration of the following, detailed description of the invention, with simultaneous reference to the appended figures, in which:
As can be seen from
In an alternative embodiment (not shown), the front part 10 of the penetrators can also be constituted by a solid body, for example in hard metal, configured to penetrate a ballistic shield by kinetic action.
The front part 10 of the penetrator 8,
In an alternative embodiment (not shown), the fin part 9 and the front penetrator part 10 are fitted on either side of an intermediate mounting part. The fin part 9 is preferably constituted by an oblong solid 13 moulded plastics body 9, 9′, configured with triangular cross section,
Apart from stabilizing the penetrator 1 during its flight phase, the fin part 9, 9′ fulfils an important function as a packing device in connection with packing of the penetrators 8 into the shell casing 3. The penetrators 8 are packed in groups 7 of, preferably, four or five penetrators 8,
Each packing group 7 comprises a centrally located penetrator 8 flanked by at least three outer penetrators 8, the three flanking penetrators 8 being arranged such that their front penetrator parts 10 lie side to side against the fin sides 14, 14′ of the centrally located penetrator 8.
In the preferred embodiment,
The packing method and the fact that the fin part 9 is shorter than the front penetrator part 10 cause the acceleration load upon firing of the carrier shell 1 to travel exclusively via the front penetration parts 10, whereby the fins 12 are totally relieved of load.
For fixing or attachment of the flanking penetrators 8 to the fin part 9 of the central penetrator 8, at least one fastening and/or fixing device (not shown) is disposed on suitable parts of the fin part 9, preferably on the concave outer sides 14, 14′ of the fin part 9. Alternatively, the fastening device can be disposed in the rear part of the front part 10 of the penetrator 8, adjacent to the fin part 9, or on an intermediate mounting part (not shown).
The fastening device is preferably of the passive type and is constituted by one or more snap fastenings configured to be broken under the influence of the rotational force of the carrier shell 1 in connection with the opening of the carrier shell 1. The fastening device can also be constituted by a glue joint or by a press fit.
The fastening devices are thus dimensioned to be broken in response to the rotational force of the shell 1, so that the direction and speed of the penetrators 8 are not disturbed.
Alternatively, the fastening device can be of the active type, i.e. configured to break in response to an electrical activation signal from an internal control unit or in response to an activation signal from a ground-based transmitter. An example of an active fastening device is an electromagnetic device, for example a solenoid.
The invention is not limited to shown embodiments but can be varied in different ways within the scope of the patent claims. It will be appreciated, for example, that the number, size, material and shape of the elements and parts which belong to the shell and the penetrators and which are of importance to the invention, for example fin parts, active components and fastening devices, can be adapted with regard to one another and with regard to other integral elements or parts, and also with regard to the enemy target or targets which are intended to be attacked.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1000245 | Mar 2010 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2011/000047 | 3/10/2011 | WO | 00 | 10/25/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/115542 | 9/22/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3545383 | Lucy | Dec 1970 | A |
3673047 | Buth et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3797359 | Mawhinney et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3941059 | Cobb | Mar 1976 | A |
4960055 | Dieval | Oct 1990 | A |
5223667 | Anderson | Jun 1993 | A |
5515785 | Zglenicki | May 1996 | A |
5796031 | Sigler | Aug 1998 | A |
6049957 | Ettmuller | Apr 2000 | A |
7107910 | Hunn et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
8499694 | Bittle et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
20070034073 | Banks | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070039507 | Hunn et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
621608 | May 1927 | FR |
WO-0188462 | Nov 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130036933 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |