This application claims priority from PCT application No. PCT/EP2020/059942 filed Apr. 7, 2020 which claims priority from European application No. EP 19168490.1 filed Apr. 10, 2019, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a method for pattern-controlled formation of the binding points of an effect thread in the woven fabric.
The introduction of effect threads into a woven fabric by means of laying needles, which are stitched into the open reed from above between the reed beat-up and the reed, whereby an effect thread loop is brought into the lower shed, has been known—for example from CH 490 541 A— for a long time. However, this has revealed the problem that the effect thread needle is not always stitched precisely into the desired warp thread gap, but rather into an adjacent warp thread gap. This can be due to var-ious reasons, for example vibration of the woven material or of the effect thread needle, in particular at higher weaving speeds, but also to a differing quality of the warp threads.
DE 20 2013 104 888 U1 discloses a through-flowable clothing for paper or pulp de-watering machines, whereby in a certain embodiment—shown in FIG. 4 of DE 20 2013 104 888 U1—according to the pattern repeat used, already the base weft threads are each woven over several base warp threads—that means in a certain floating manner—although uniformly over the entire woven fabric. In this embodiment of DE 20 2013 104 888 U1, additional warp threads are then introduced which there-after—in the said embodiment—extend in a long floating manner over several base weft threads parallel to the base warp threads. Therefore, the described embodiment of DE 20 2013 104 888 U1 does not provide an approach to solving the above-described problem that the effect thread needle is not always stitched precisely into the desired warp thread gap, but rather into an adjacent warp thread gap, whereby it is also not apparent that such a problem would be at all significant in the application of the woven fabric of DE 20 2013 104 888 U1.
In EP 1 731 643 A1 a woven fabric is disclosed as a membrane for a loudspeaker, in which a conductive thread is incorporated, for example, in a meandering manner, wherein this conductive thread is positioned at the points at which it expands parallel to the respective adjacent warp threads in the manner of a replacement for each one of the warp threads. In any case, EP 1 731 643 A1 does not disclose any measures for solving the above-described problem that the effect thread needle is not always stitched precisely into the desired warp thread gap, but at most into an adjacent warp thread gap, whereby it is also not apparent that such a problem would be at all significant when applying the teaching of EP 1 731 643 A1.
An object of the invention is to propose a manufacturing process in which the binding of the effect thread is precise in the sense that the aforementioned uncertainty as to whether it is precisely stitched between two warp threads or closely beside them is irrelevant. The object is achieved by a manufacturing process. Thereby, the measures of the invention initially result in the fact that the weft thread, which is intended to bind the effect thread, floats over a certain length thereof over warp threads, i.e. it is shot over a certain number of warp threads. In the sense of this invention, float is to be understood as the region of the respective weft thread which has been introduced over several warp threads, without being arranged underneath one of the warp threads. The length of the float can be specified as a geometric length, for example 1 mm, or as a certain number of warp threads, that means for example, at least 6. Due to the fact that the effect needle is stitched within the floating weft thread length, the effect thread slips to the respective end of the floating weft thread length after the binding step, or possibly in one of the subsequent cycles. As the two ends of the floating weft thread lengths are uniquely defined by the woven fabric construction, the binding point of the effect thread is thus also precisely defined.
The method of the present invention can be used in a particularly advantageous mat-s ter when, in a woven fabric which is to be cut into individual woven fabric strips during the manufacturing process, subsequent fraying is to be prevented from the outset by incorporating zigzag structures, which are then cut in a further step with a cold knife or a tool having the same effect. Thereby, warp threads that are lying loosely between the zigzag structure of the cover threads or the effect threads and the cutting edge in the woven fabric, are simply pulled off subsequently. If the effect thread needle is not always stitched precisely into the desired warp thread gap, it can hap-pen that the warp threads lying next to the zigzag stitch are—in one case—over-stiched by the zigzag stitch and—in another case—are lying freely. As a result, a continuous drawing off of the warp threads is not possible or more difficult and the threads may get caught and break at the points where they are stitched. The measures of the invention in this advantageous application solve the problem by vir-tue of the fact that the weft threads float over a certain weft thread length between the edge-sided binding points of two adjacent zigzag lines. If the measures of the invention are applied, the needles that bring the zigzag stitch into the shed from the top only need to stitch somewhere within the floating weft thread region. This is because the binding point of the zigzag thread automatically slips to the desired position, at the latest when the subsequent stitching process is carried out.
A further advantageous application of the present invention is achieved by the fact that when having two—preferably also zigzag shaped—effect threads, stitches are applied at certain points in such manner that the two threads touch each other at certain points of the woven fabric. On the one hand, this can enable certain optical effects. On the other hand, it is also possible to form effect threads as conductor threads—namely as metal threads or metal-coated textile threads, and to then provide very specific, precise points at which the two conductor threads touch and thus have an electrical connection. Of course, this can occur over the length of the woven fabric at a wide variety of points, possibly only once or twice over the entire length of the woven fabric, or else even at each zigzag. Particularly in the case of labels which are provided with electrical elements such as sensors or microprocessors, a specific conductive pattern can be made possible, particularly if more than two conductive effect threads are incorporated. It should be emphasized in this connection that the conductive effect threads do not necessarily have to be incorporated in a zigzag manner, but rather can be, for example, meander-shaped over long distances, in which case the float according to the invention is provided only at the point of contact.
In one application of the invention, a textile woven fabric is produced which has the property of a textile circuit board. In this case, the woven fabric is woven in multiple layers with at least several warp thread layers, wherein one of the warp thread layers has conductive threads, that is metal threads or, for example, threads metallized at the surface. It is possible for the application described here that all or only certain warp threads of such warp thread layer exhibit the conductive property. Moreover, certain weft threads have such a conductive property. Thereby, the woven fabric is initially laid out in such manner that the conductive weft threads and the conductive warp threads do not touch each other, as they are separated from each other, for example, by a non-conductive warp thread layer. However, the conductive weft threads and the conductive warp threads are brought into contact among each other by the cover threads, which themselves are non-conductive. In this application, the position of the binding point is determined precisely by the fact that, due to the float in the woven fabric, the cover thread slips exactly to the point at which the electrical connection is intended. Once such a contact point of the conductive weft threads with the conductive warp threads has been established in the woven fabric, the cover thread is guided to the next intended contact point and stitched there. Applications of this design are manifold. On the one hand, antenna loops can be considered which are incorporated into a textile woven fabric and which—after the application, for example, of an RFID chip—form an RFID textile (for example, a label). On the other hand, this aspect of the invention can also be used to form a heating textile or an induction loop for charging batteries or for wireless transmission of data.
Further advantageous embodiments of the weaving loom are described herein.
The aforementioned elements, as well as those claimed and described in the following exemplary embodiments, to be used according to the invention, are not subject to any particular conditions by way of exclusion in terms of their size, shape, use of material and technical design, with the result that the selection criteria known in the respective field of application can be used without restrictions.
Examples of the weaving loom will henceforth be described in more detail by reference to the drawings, which show:
Another application—shown by means of
A further application of the present invention relates to the formation of a textile heating tape, shown by means of
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
19168490 | Apr 2019 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2020/059942 | 4/7/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/208045 | 10/15/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1098081 | Baum | May 1914 | A |
1158391 | Ringe | Oct 1915 | A |
1384519 | De Voe | Jul 1921 | A |
1707068 | Rubel | Mar 1929 | A |
2250689 | Weaver | Jul 1941 | A |
2450429 | Henning | Oct 1948 | A |
2509372 | Seifried | May 1950 | A |
2598426 | Peterson | May 1952 | A |
2729176 | Smith | Jan 1956 | A |
3908708 | Nogai | Sep 1975 | A |
4244199 | Rhode | Jan 1981 | A |
4410015 | Koller | Oct 1983 | A |
5517933 | Karaba, Jr. | May 1996 | A |
5720323 | Tremer | Feb 1998 | A |
6273149 | Dewispelaere | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289941 | Debaes | Sep 2001 | B1 |
8333222 | Leppla | Dec 2012 | B2 |
10550498 | Hofstetter | Feb 2020 | B2 |
20090149098 | Andronis | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20130118633 | Studer | May 2013 | A1 |
20150354106 | Beauduin | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160083875 | Thiel | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160083876 | Thiel | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20180179675 | Rutz | Jun 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
490541 | May 1970 | CH |
10 2010 026 609 | Nov 2011 | DE |
20 2013 104 888 | Mar 2015 | DE |
1 731 643 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1312332 | Apr 1973 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Written Opinion and International Search Report in related PCT/EP2020/059942. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230096264 A1 | Mar 2023 | US |