The present invention relates generally to photovoltaic devices, and more particularly to a method for etching a Mo layer in a photovoltaic device comprising CIGS material.
Thin layers of material comprising Cu(In,Ga)Se, i.e. CIGS, are known to exhibit the highest photovoltaic conversion efficiency of any thin film material for a photovoltaic device (19.5%). See K. Ramanathan et al., “Properties of High-Efficiency CIGS Thin-Film Solar Cells,” 31st IEEE Photovoltaics Specialists Conference and Exhibition, Lake Buena Vista, Fla., Jan. 3-7, 2005; and D. E. Tarrant et al., “CIS thin film development and product status at Shell Solar, May 2003,” Proc. of 3rd WCPEC, Osaka, Japan, May 2003. Similar progress has been reported in the manufacturing area, where the efficiency of champion modules has exceeded 13% with yield above 80%. See M. Contreras et al., “High Efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se2-Based Solar Cells: Processing of Novel Absorber Structures,” Proc. of 1st WCPEC, Hi., Dec. 5-9, 1994. Consequently, CIGS is considered by many in the art to be an attractive material for use in the manufacture of thin film photovoltaic panels.
In a typical solar cell module, as shown in
While the above-mentioned reported efficiencies of thin-film photovoltaic modules including CIGS are promising, there is a large gap between those numbers and actually-obtained efficiencies of known commercial photovoltaic modules containing CIGS. One problem is that laser and mechanical scribes are commonly used to pattern and form interconnects in thin-film photovoltaic modules, and these prior art processes have a number of drawbacks that limit module efficiency. For example, they create wide scribes, defects, and shunt current paths. Furthermore, they provide limited means for wiring the module in series-parallel arrangements that might reduce sensitivity to series resistance, shading losses or non-uniformity.
For these and other reasons, some have considered using lithographic patterning processes to form thin-film photovoltaic module interconnects. However, these processes would require the ability to etch Mo, and, in some cases, to do so selectively so that, for example, the etch will not induce excessive undercut of an overlying CIGS layer. The prior art literature provides scant reference to etching Mo in a CIGS solar cell, and is otherwise insufficient to solve this problem.
Moreover, it was not even known to etch CIGS in a solar cell until the invention of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/395,080 (AMAT-10936), the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. While this invention dramatically advanced the state of the art of thin-film photovoltaic modules, and also mentions etching Mo, additional problems have arisen that were not seriously addressed before that invention.
For example, as shown in
When such a MoSe2 layer is formed, both the Mo layer and this additional MoSe2 layer need to be removed during processing, and ideally using an etch. Again, the prior art literature is insufficient for overcoming this newly-observed problem. For example, T. Ohmori et al., in their article entitled “pH Dependent Controlled patterning of p-MoSe2 Surfaces by In-Situ Electrochemical Scanning Tunneling Microscopy,” Langmuir, 14 (21), 6287-6290 (1998) propose using a solution of 0.05M NH3 and 0.025M KNO3 with the assistance of a high electrical field induced between an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) tip and a MoSe2 surface. For a typical gap of 2 nm between the AFM tip and the substrate and with the reported etching threshold voltage of 0.3V, the electrical field is as high as 1.5×108 V/m which is unsuitable for application to macro-scale processes such as photovoltaic module fabrication. Likewise, S. Chandra and S. N. Sahu, in their paper entitled “Electrodeposited semiconducting molybdenum selenide films: I. Preparatory technique and structural characterization,” J. Phys. D: App. Phys., Vol. 17 (1984), pp. 2115-2123, propose an electro-deposition method of MoSe2 films. While the article implies a MoSe2 etch in basic solutions, no etch recipe is given, and in any event it does not describe a useful process for photovoltaic module fabrication.
Therefore, there remains a need in the art to overcome many of the shortcomings of the conventional processes for etching an underlying metal Mo layer in a thin-film photovoltaic device having CIGS material. The present invention aims at doing this, among other things.
The present invention provides a method of patterning a MoSe2 and/or Mo material, for example a layer of such material(s) in a thin-film structure. According to one aspect, the invention relates to etch solutions that can effectively etch through Mo and/or MoSe2. According to another aspect, the invention relates to etching such materials when such materials are processed with other materials in a thin film photovoltaic device. According to other aspects, the invention includes a process of etching Mo and/or MoSe2 with selectivity to a layer of CIGS material in an overall process flow. According to still further aspects, the invention relates to Mo and/or MoSe2 etch solutions that are useful in an overall photolithographic process for forming a photovoltaic cell and/or interconnects and test structures in a photovoltaic device.
In furtherance of these and other objects, a method of processing a thin-film structure according to the invention includes etching a thin film layer in the thin-film structure, wherein the thin film layer comprises molybdenum. In certain embodiments, the etched thin film layer further comprises selenium. In other embodiments, the etched thin film layer comprises Mo and MoSe2. In additional embodiments, the method further includes defining a masking layer so as to pattern the thin film layer. In other embodiments, the thin-film structure includes a photovoltaic film such as CIGS.
These and other aspects and features of the present invention will become apparent to those ordinarily skilled in the art upon review of the following description of specific embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein:
The present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the drawings, which are provided as illustrative examples of the invention so as to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. Notably, the figures and examples below are not meant to limit the scope of the present invention to a single embodiment, but other embodiments are possible by way of interchange of some or all of the described or illustrated elements. Moreover, where certain elements of the present invention can be partially or fully implemented using known components, only those portions of such known components that are necessary for an understanding of the present invention will be described, and detailed descriptions of other portions of such known components will be omitted so as not to obscure the invention. In the present specification, an embodiment showing a singular component should not be considered limiting; rather, the invention is intended to encompass other embodiments including a plurality of the same component, and vice-versa, unless explicitly stated otherwise herein. Moreover, applicants do not intend for any term in the specification or claims to be ascribed an uncommon or special meaning unless explicitly set forth as such. Further, the present invention encompasses present and future known equivalents to the known components referred to herein by way of illustration.
Generally, the present inventors have discovered several etch solutions that can effectively etch through Mo and/or MoSe2, and particularly when such materials are patterned during photolithographic processing with other materials such as CIGS in a thin film photovoltaic device.
As shown in
As shown in
While the etch system of this embodiment of the invention completely and successfully etches Mo and MoSe2, its etch selectivity between MoSe2/Mo and certain masks such as certain types of photoresist is low, and so such masks or photoresists may be heavily damaged using this etch solution. Accordingly, the mask may not be usable for subsequent processing and may need to be removed after the etch. Accordingly, the usefulness of this etch system may be limited in patterning applications such as photolithographic processing.
Moreover, when one of the layers other than Mo/MoSe2 in the thin-film structure is a CIGS layer, the exposed CIGS film will induce intense reaction of CIGS and H2O2, which causes the process to become very hard to control and can result in severe undercut of the CIGS film.
Another preferred embodiment of the invention is shown in
The process starts as shown in
It should be noted that before CIGS material deposition, in some embodiments a thin compound layer containing Se is first deposited on top of thee Mo film to act as a seeding layer for CIGS growth. In this example process, Se atoms diffuse into Mo and can form a MoSe2 layer (not shown) at the interface between CIGS layer 304 and the Mo layer 302.
The next step in the process flow is to make an isolation cut through the stack 300 to the glass. According to an aspect of this embodiment of the invention, photolithographic processing is used. For example, in this embodiment shown in
In this example application of forming a photovoltaic module, these lines 316 are used to divide the module into cells and can run the entire length of the module. These lines are also used in the process of forming interconnects between cells as will be described in more detail below. It should be noted that in this step, many hundreds of these lines substantially parallel to each other can be formed on the module. Moreover, other lines and patterns may be made during this step, for example corresponding to test structures and lines for parallel wiring arrangements. Discussions of such other alternative or additional processing will be omitted here for the sake of clarity of the invention.
As shown in
According to an aspect of the invention, the same photoresist mask can also be used as an etch mask for a subsequent wet etch of the MoSe2/Mo layer 302. For the MoSe2/Mo etch, the present inventors have discovered that a strong oxidizer solution of NaClO, for example as that solution is found in bleach such as Clorox® bleach, is able to remove the Mo layer as well as the thin MoSe2 layer that is present in the CIGS solar cells of certain embodiments. The etch rate is about 10 Å/sec and takes less than 2 minutes to cleanly remove MoSe2/Mo films having a thickness of approximately 1 μm.
In general it is desirable to have at least 5:1 etch rate selectivity between MoSe2/Mo and both CIGS and the photoresist, in order to have a wide enough process window to minimize the undercut of CIGS. It is found that this selectivity is obtained for Mo and Shipley 3612 photoresist with the above described NaClO solution (i.e. Clorox® bleach). Therefore, it is possible to perform an etch using this etch system and using a photoresist mask for patterning the Mo layer.
For example, in accordance with techniques described in more detail in co-pending application Ser. No. 11/394,721 (AMAT-10668), the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference, a reflector or mirror is placed in close proximity to the top surface (e.g. 50 μm) and the illumination is incident from the under side of the glass substrate 312 at an angle. The light reflects from the mirror and exposes a region of photoresist adjacent to the already formed scribe 318. Therefore, this exposure is self-aligned to the existing scribe, and creates a 30 μm wide aperture in the module having one edge corresponding to the line 318.
As shown in
It should be noted that other wet etch solutions may be possible, as well as dry etch processes. Although dry etches are commonly used in lithographic processing, they are generally more costly than wet etches. Dry etches usually involve chemical reactions using ions in a plasma to create volatile by-products. Moreover, the dry etch equipment may not be available for large substrate processes. An advantage of the wet etch process examples provided herein is that they include the use of inexpensive chemicals such as sulphuric acid and peroxide. It is also possible to use plasma etching to remove these films, but the cost of the equipment would be much higher than wet etch processes.
In the next step shown in
Removing the photoresist lifts off the insulator deposited thereon, leaving portions of insulator 320 on the opposing walls of the CIGS layer adjacent to the interconnect groove 330 that were exposed through openings 316″, as shown in
A layer 322 of a transparent conductor such as 0.7 μm of aluminum doped zinc oxide (AZO) is deposited over the surface of the stack 300 in a next step shown in
In a next step shown in
It should be noted that, in addition to dividing cells and forming interconnects, the etch and patterning processes described above can be used to form test structures, for example, adjacent to the active area, or even in a small portion of the active area. For example, the etching can be used to isolate a small portion of a deposited film, so that properties such as thickness or conductivity can be measured. In some cases, an earlier deposition may be etched away in an earlier process step, so that a later deposition is formed on the glass substrate, allowing the later deposition to be electrically isolated, with underlayers absent. This allows intermediate process parameters to be measured by probing before the full process is complete.
Moreover, as set forth in co-pending application Ser. No. 11/395,080 (AMAT-10936), the CIGS etch and patterning process described above may also be used for other purposes. For example, the process can be used to form contact pads or to place small surface-mount protect diodes. In addition, it is possible to perform the process of edge isolation while performing the cell division using the CIGS etch process. Edge isolation is the process of removing deposited layers from the edges of the module, so they will not run over the edge and short out. This process is normally done using laser scribing, but can be included in the cell division etch process (e.g. as shown in
Although the present invention has been particularly described with reference to the preferred embodiments thereof, it should be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that changes and modifications in the form and details may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is intended that the appended claims encompass such changes and modifications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3726956 | Silver | Apr 1973 | A |
4599154 | Bender et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
6087256 | Wada | Jul 2000 | A |
6946681 | Jeong et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7235736 | Buller et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7259865 | Cummings et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20040263944 | Miles et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050253142 | Negami et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080119005 A1 | May 2008 | US |