1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a multi-player game similar to craps, and more particularly toward a multi-player table or video-based wagering game.
2. Related Art
Craps is a long established game with a colorful history. During World Wars I and II, the game enjoyed resurgence in popularity due to servicemen finding a way to fill idle time. When these same servicemen came home from the war having been exposed to the fast moving game of craps, the casinos were willing and ready for the expansion of the game in their casinos. As this generation began to mature and decrease their visits to the casinos, the popularity of the game saw a noted decrease. During this time, table games took a backseat as casino floor space was increasingly dedicated to slot machine play.
This trend is even now beginning to change, and the industry is starting to see a resurgence of table game popularity. One of the important aspects fueling this increase in demand is attributed to the level of entertainment value expected by customers. Many casino game players consider participating in a live table game like craps to be among the highest of table game excitements.
In part, this resurgence in table game interest can be attributed to the introduction of variations in game play for these traditional games. This, combined with the emergence of a new breed of gamers exposed to internet gaming, has resulted in a global explosion in this field. Several variations in the game of craps can be found in prior art examples, including U.S. Pat. No. 6,688,587 to Jones, issued Feb. 10, 2004, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated. Another example may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,520,503 to Porto, issued Feb. 18, 2003. The Porto '503 patent is also incorporated here by reference, and describes a game method that can be characterized as a merger of craps and roulette in the same game using a modified roulette wheel as a point generation device. In Porto, the standard numbers of a roulette wheel are changed to reflect dice numbers, as shown in FIG. 3 of that patent.
A particular shortcoming of prior art craps games like those described above involve the requirement that a player possess both value cheques and non-value color chips to play the entire game. The purchase of chips or tokens is an expensive investment for a casino, in view of the fact that both value cheques and non-value chips must be provided for every table game. Furthermore, a game dealer must handle both value cheques and non-value chips during each round of play, thereby slowing each game. Consequently, not many hands can be played per hour. Alternatively a so-called “Mucker” must be provided to assist the dealer in handling the color, non-value chips required in the prior art method of play. Often, costs associated with labor are the single largest component of overhead costs for the casinos. With the prior art style of play, therefore, the casino labor costs will be higher if they wish to increase the speed of game play.
Furthermore, the risk of mistake or fraud is enhanced due to the use of non-value color chips together with the value cheques. In all, the prior art methods are not conducive to the fast paced game play which is increasingly attractive to the newer breed of game players, and also more profitable for casino operators.
And still further, the so-called “Bottom Half” math of the prior art games such as that described by Porto is deficient and not attractive to casinos. For example, according to Porto, players are given a 100% return on the numbers 5 and 9 and an 83.333% return on the 7. These are referred to as a player's negative expectation of zero on the 5 and 9, and a negative expectation of 16.667% on the number 7. A knowledgeable player is likely to appreciate this disparity and bet the 5 and 9 on the Bottom Half math. Consequently, a commercial gaming company is unlikely to place a game like that described by Porto on their playing floor due to the lack of a sufficient house edge. The odds bet on a craps game is the only even odds in a casino. This is allowed on a traditional craps game because a player must place another bet before being allowed to make the odds wager.
And further still, it is important to note that in the game method described in the Porto patent, if a player achieves a 7, they push all color bets. This is considered a shortcoming for reasons that will be described subsequently.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved method for playing a table game which will be familiar to players yet at the same time include intriguing and novel elements of play, and which enables faster mucking and more hands per hour than traditional games of craps. The proposed game should be sufficiently distinct from traditional games that new levels of excitement and interest are generated without being so different from familiar game methods that players are confused or not intrigued at first impression.
The invention describes a method for playing a multi-player table game similar to craps. The method comprises the steps of providing a betting surface and designating a plurality of player positions about the betting surface. Each player position bears a distinctive player indicia. Twelve common betting locations are prescribed on the betting surface. Replicas of each player indicia are affixed within the boundaries of each common betting location. A point generation device is provided to randomly select one outcome from a group consisting of thirty-seven or thirty-eight possible outcomes. The thirty-seven or thirty-eight possible outcomes are associated with the twelve common betting locations according to the following arrangement:
At least one outcome is associated with a first of the twelve common betting locations,
One outcome is associated with a second of the twelve common betting locations,
Two outcomes are associated with a third of the twelve common betting locations,
Three outcomes are associated with a fourth of the twelve common betting locations,
Four outcomes are associated with a fifth of the twelve common betting locations,
Five outcomes are associated with a sixth of the twelve common betting locations,
Six outcomes are associated with a seventh of the twelve common betting locations,
Five outcomes are associated with an eighth of the twelve common betting locations,
Four outcomes are associated with a ninth of the twelve common betting locations,
Three outcomes are associated with a tenth of the twelve common betting locations,
Two outcomes are associated with an eleventh of the twelve common betting locations, and
One outcome is associated with a twelfth of the twelve common betting locations.
A table game operated in the manner described above represents an improvement over known methods for playing games similar to craps. This game method is both familiar and at the same time new and interesting in that new betting options and strategy options are made available to the players. Furthermore, the game method enables non-value color chips to be eliminated so that game dealers will handle only value cheques. This saves the casino from investing in non-value chips. By eliminating the non-value color chips, quicker payout, faster mucking and more hands per hour can be achieved. A single dealer is thus enabled to manage the affairs of game play, without the need for a Mucking assistant. Therefore, labor costs associated with play of the subject game are lower than in prior art methods. Furthermore, the risk of mistake or fraud is further reduced by the elimination of non-value color chips. By affixing replicas of each player indicia within the boundaries of each common betting location, player bets can be identified by value cheques irrespective of color. Rather, player bets are coordinated by their association with the player indicia which is replicated within each of the twelve common betting areas. This enables the game dealer to render more accurate paybacks with less likelihood of mistake or fraud.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more readily appreciated when considered in connection with the following detailed description and appended drawings, wherein:
Referring to the Figures, wherein like numerals indicate like or corresponding parts throughout the several views, a table for playing a multi-player game similar to craps is generally shown at 10. The table 10 provides a generally horizontal betting surface 12 which is traditionally established by a felt covering, but may be any suitable surface or even a virtual representation of a playing surface displayed on a graphic user interface. A point generation device, generally indicated at 14, is associated with the table 10 so that a dealer 16 or table game operator can actuate the point generation device 14 and manage game play occurring over the betting surface 12. A plurality of player positions 18 are comfortably spaced about the betting surface 12 so that players can stand or sit side-by-side without disturbing the next adjacent player. The player positions 18 are distinguished one from another by distinctive player indicia which, in the preferred embodiment, includes the display of numbers arranged sequentially beginning with the number “1”. Thus, in the examples shown, six player positions 18 are provided, designated by the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
The point generation device 14 may be of the card wheel variety such as that described in the applicant's copending application US 2008/0073842, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. In this configuration, the point generation device 14 has a turntable configuration supported for free rotation about a vertical axis. A plurality of trays extend radially from the central axis and are sized, shaped and oriented so as to hold a single playing card 20 in a generally upstanding orientation. The cards 20 may be dimensionally similar to those used for playing card games like poker, blackjack and the like, although other shapes are certainly possible. Either thirty-seven or thirty-eight trays are formed in the point generation device 14 so as to hold either thirty-seven or thirty-eight individual cards 20. In the example of thirty-seven trays, each tray occupies a sector of approximately 9.73°. In the example of a thirty-eight tray configuration, each tray occupies a sector of approximately 9.47°. The game play method of the subject invention requires the point generation device 14 to be capable of randomly selecting one outcome from a group consisting of thirty-seven or thirty-eight possible outcomes. Thus, by affixing a different graphic depiction on each playing card 20, the thirty-seven or thirty-eight possible outcomes can be achieved by use of the card wheel style point generation device 14. When the card wheel is spun, it eventually comes to rest in a manner that singulates a particular one of the playing cards 20 from among the thirty-seven or thirty-eight possible playing cards 20.
Of course, those of skill in the art will readily envision alternative point generation devices which may be used instead of the card wheel style device 14. For one example,
Referring now to
Replicas 48 of each player indicia 18 are affixed within the boundaries of each common betting location 22. Thus, as perhaps best shown in
Referring now to
Furthermore, it is desirable to exclusively correlate eighteen of the possible outcomes to a first color, exclusively correlate a different eighteen possible outcomes with a second color, and correlate the remaining one or two outcomes (depending upon whether there are thirty-seven or thirty-eight possible outcomes total) with neither the first color nor the second color. The first and second colors can be any two distinctive colors, but in the preferred embodiment are represented by the colors red and black, with red being designated the first color and black being designated the second color. The colors are imprinted on each of the cards 20 as shown in
Referring again to
Turning now to
Each player is assigned a player position number 18 that corresponds to the replicas 48 in the twelve common betting locations 22, as well as the first and second color bet locations 54, 56. These areas all are located in the bottom half of the betting surface 12. Position numbers 18 and their corresponding replicas 48 eliminate the need for non-value color roulette chips such as those required in the exemplary U.S. Pat. No. 6,520,503 to Porto, as well as similar game play methods. Thus, the use of position numbers 18 and their counterpart replicas 48 removes one of the main features of the game of roulette. As a consequence, the game play method of this invention is substantially distinct from the game of roulette. Game dealers handle only value cheques, which saves the casino from making the investment in non-value chips which are otherwise useful only in a single game. The elimination of non-value color chips allows for quicker payout, faster mucking and more hands per hour. Labor is often the number one expense to a casino. In order to maintain well-paced game speed with the above-referenced Porto game, the casino would need a Mucker to assist the dealer with the color, non-value chips. However, the subject game play method can maintain suitable game play speeds with only one dealer and no Mucker assistant. This represents a huge cost savings to casinos. Furthermore, the risk of mistake or fraud is further reduced by the elimination of non-value color chips.
Preferably, proposition betting areas in the bottom half of the betting surface 12 are laid out in a manner so that players are forced to bet in the location mirroring their assigned player position number 18. Although the illustrated examples show only six player positions 18, more or fewer player positions 18 may be crafted to accommodate larger or smaller groups of players at the table 10. The use of forced betting locations via the replicas 48 eliminates any question as to which player's value cheque is in a particular betting square. The same logic extends to the color bet locations 54, 56. The six possible outcomes 36 of the number “7” (1/6, 6/1, 2/5, 5/2, 3/4, 4/3) are preferably split equally between color bets red and black. In the proposed examples, if the smaller number occurs first or is on top (3/4, 2/5 or 1/6) on the decision determination element (card 20, bingo ball 20′, RNG, modified roulette wheel, etc.) the selection is designated as a first color, i.e., red. However, if the larger number occurs first or is on top (4/3, 5/2 or 6/1) then it is designated as a second color bet, i.e., black. This particular arrangement is advantageous in that the low numbers are designated as the first color (i.e., red) and the high numbers are designated as the second color (i.e., black). This particular arrangement is also advantageous because the possible outcomes 36 of the number “7” are a multiple of the required bet. Thus, proposition bets of this invention can achieve acceptable house advantage edges which make them particularly attractive to casinos and other game hosts. Of course, the specific colors red and black are not per se important, merely that they are distinguishable from one another and used consistently.
The similarity of the subject game play method to the traditional games of craps and roulette (both American-style 38 slot and European-style 37 slot games) will be appreciated by those of skill in the art. Nevertheless, the subject game play method proposes many subtle changes that will generate new levels of excitement and interest for players without introducing confusion or disinterest at first impression. For example, no number in traditional roulette is ever representative of more than one color. However, according to this invention, the number 7 can be either Red or Black, thus making the proposition section of this game un-like traditional roulette. Another relevant distinction from the prior art like that described in the above-noted Porto patent arises when a player obtains a 7. According to the prior art, i.e., Porto, the player that obtains a 7 will push all color bets. However, the subject game play includes all of the possible combinations of 7 in the color bets. As a result, it is not necessary to eliminate the six possible occurrences of 7 plus the one or two occurrences of 0 from the color bets as required in the prior art. Instead, according to this invention, only one card or two cards (depending on the number of Joker cards played) are eliminated with respect to color bets. This distinction increases player enjoyment and can be used to craft more suitable odds for the casino.
The game method of this invention utilizes one or two Jokers depending on the casino or house preferring a particular edge or mathematics of game play. If one Joker is used, the payout for the Joker is 35:1. However, if two Jokers are used, the payout for Jokers is reduced to 17:1. Of course, the term “Joker” is used here to indicate a possible point generation outcome that is not included in one of the thirty-six possible outcomes of two six-sided dice.
The casino or game operator can add additional side bets to the game which might require a changed in the composition of the point generation device 14. Naturally, this may require new payouts on the proposition wagers, without departing from the spirit or scope of this invention. The number of chances of hitting any winning combination directly affects the payout of the individual result.
In
Of course, in a variation of the game described above, the indicia borne on each card 20, or ball 20′, may include a machine-readable code such as, for example, a bar code. A card reading device 72 is shown in
At the start of each game, each player wagers according to the game rules and makes a forecast on the game outcome. A dealer places the point generation device 14 into rotation or otherwise operates the device to singulate one outcome from the group consisting of thirty-seven or thirty-eight possible outcomes. This outcome is either announced, or as shown in the illustration, the dealer may pass the one singulated card 20 in view of the scanner 72 causing the digital processor 78 to recognize the outcome and advance play of the game according to the traditional rules of craps. The dealer may be provided with a separate graphical user interface 80 to aid in the administration of the game play and the wagering process.
The foregoing invention has been described in accordance with the relevant legal standards, thus the description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed embodiment may become apparent to those skilled in the art and fall within the scope of the invention. Accordingly the scope of legal protection afforded this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
This application claims priority to Provisional Patent Application No. 61/041,701 which was filed on Apr. 2, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5490670 | Hobert | Feb 1996 | A |
5768382 | Schneier et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5829749 | Hobert | Nov 1998 | A |
6520503 | Porto | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6688597 | Jones | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6893019 | Gaygen | May 2005 | B2 |
20080073842 | Jones | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090250873 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61041701 | Apr 2008 | US |