Not Applicable.
The present invention relates to a device for post-installation in-situ barrier creation, and more particularly to a multi-layered device providing a medium for post-installation injection of remedial substances such as waterproofing resins or cements, insecticides, mold preventatives, rust retardants and the like.
It is common in underground structures, such as tunnels, mines and large buildings with subterranean foundations, to require that the structures be watertight. Thus, it is essential to prevent groundwater from contacting the porous portions of structures or joints, which are typically of concrete. It is also essential to remove water present in the voids of such concrete as such water may swell during low temperatures and fracture the concrete or may contact ferrous portions of the structure, resulting in oxidation and material degradation. Therefore, devices have been developed for removing water from the concrete structure and for preventing water from contacting the concrete structure.
Attempts at removing groundwater from the concrete structure have included a permeable liner and an absorbent sheet. Both absorb adjacent water, carrying it from the concrete structure. This type is system is limited, however, because it cannot introduce a fluid or gaseous substance to the concrete and as the water removed is only that in contact with the system. Additionally, this system does not provide a waterproof barrier.
Among attempts at preventing water from contacting the concrete structure has been the installation of a waterproof liner between a shoring system and the concrete form. This method fails if the waterproof liner is punctured with rebar or other sharp objects, which is common at construction sites. In such an occurrence, it may be necessary for the concrete form to be disassembled so a new waterproof liner may be installed. Such deconstruction is time consuming and expensive. It would therefore be preferable to install a system that provides a secondary waterproof alternative, should the initial waterproof layer fail. Additionally, attempts at preventing water from contacting a concrete structure have included installation of a membrane that swells upon contact with water. While this type of membrane is effective in absorbing the water and expanding to form a water barrier, this type of membrane is limited in its swelling capacity. Therefore, it would be preferable to provide a system that is unlimited in its swelling capacity by allowing a material to be added until the leak is repaired.
Another attempt to resolving this problem was disclosed in “Achieving Dry Stations and Tunnels with Flexible Waterproofing Membranes,” published by Egger, et al. on Mar. 2, 2004 discloses a flexible membrane for waterproofing tunnels and underground structures. The flexible membrane includes first and second layers, which are installed separately. The first layer is a nonwoven polypropylene geotextile, which serves as a cushion against the pressure applied during the placement of the final lining where the membrane is pushed hard against the sub-strata. The first layer also transports water to the pipes at the membrane toe in an open system. The second layer is commonly a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane or a modified polyethylene (PE) membrane, and is installed on top of the first layer. The waterproof membrane is subdivided into sections by welding water barriers to the membrane at their base. Leakage is detected through pipes running from the waterproof membrane to the face of the concrete lining. The pipes are placed at high and low points of each subdivided section. If leakage is detected, a low viscosity grout can be injected through the lower laying pipes. However the welding and the separate installation of the first and second layers make this waterproof system difficult to install, thus requiring highly skilled laborers.
It would therefore be advantageous to provide an in-situ multi-layered device for post-installation concrete sealing, and more particularly a providing a medium for post-installation injection of waterproofing resin.
One object of the invention is to provide a single application which includes a first layer providing an initial waterproof surface. Another object of the invention is to provide a secondary, remedial layer that is operable should the first layer fail. A further object of the invention is to provide that such multi-layer system be quickly and easily installed. An additional object of the present invention allows selective introduction of a fluid substance to specific areas of a structure.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a dual-layered layer that:
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description, the accompanying drawing and the appended claims.
First layer 130 is preferably semi-permeable. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, first layer 130 should be made of a material suitable for permeating fluids therethrough, while prohibiting passage of concrete or other similar structural construction materials. A polypropylene or polyethylene non-woven geotextile is suitable. Additionally, other materials known in the art may be preferable depending on the particular application.
Second layer 110 is a non-permeable layer that is preferably waterproof and self-sealing. Second layer 110 can be an asphalt sheet, or other like material known in the art. Second layer 110 may have an adhesive affixed to second layer interior side 114, second layer exterior side 112, or both sides 112 and 114. Adhesive on second layer interior side 114 permits joining of adjacent panels of substance delivery system 100. Adhesive on second layer exterior side 112 aids in affixing substance delivery system 100 to shoring system 20 (seen in
Intermediate layer 120 is a void-inducing layer, conducive to permitting a free-flowing substance to flow throughout substance delivery system 100. Intermediate layer 120 may be formed by an open lattice of fibers of sufficient rigidity to maintain the presence of the void when an inward force is exerted against substance delivery system 100. A polypropylene lattice or other similarly rigid material is preferable. The presence of intermediate layer 120 permits the channeling of free-flowing substances through substance delivery system 100. Intermediate layer 120 either channels water away from structural construction material 200, or provides a medium for transporting a free-flowing substance to structural construction material 200.
Referring to
In the preferred embodiment, seen in
Referring to
Referring to
Division strip 162 is preferably comprised of a material that swells upon contact with water. When water interacts with division strip 162, division strip 162 outwardly expands, thereby eliminating communication between the abutting substance delivery systems 100. Thus, division strip 162 compartmentalizes each panel of substance delivery system 100. Compartmentalization enables selective injection of a fluid or gas into a predetermined panel of substance delivery system 100. Alternatively, division strip 162 is formed from a non-swelling material. When division strip 162 is non-swelling, the structural construction material 200 forms around division strip 162, thereby filling in any voids and forming a seal between adjacent substance delivery systems 100.
Referring to
In the preferred embodiment depicted in
First layer 130 permeates the free flowing substance into the space between first layer 130 and structural construction material 200. When the free flowing substance is a hydrophilic liquid, the free flowing substance interacts with any water present, thereby causing the free flowing substance to expand and become impermeable, creating an impenetrable waterproof layer. Thus, a secondary waterproof barrier can be created if a failure occurs in second layer 110.
Alternatively, different free flowing substances may be introduced to substance delivery system 100, depending on the situation. If the integrity of structural construction material 200 is compromised, a resin for strengthening structural construction material 200 can be injected into substance delivery system 100 to repair structural construction material 200. Alternatively, a gas may be injected into substance delivery system 100 for providing mold protection, rust retardation, delivering an insecticide, or other similar purposes.
In a separate and distinct embodiment of the invention, intermediate layer 120 may be completely replaced with first layer 130.
In a separate and distinct embodiment of the invention, substance delivery system 100 is directly attached to the earth, such as in a tunnel or mine. In this embodiment, substance delivery system 100 is inversely installed on tunnel surface (not shown). First layer 130 faces tunnel surface and second layer 110 inwardly faces tunnel space. Substance delivery system 100 can be fixedly attached by applying an adhesive to first layer 130, driving nails through substance delivery system 100, or similar attaching means known in the art. Substance delivery system 100 is installed in vertical segments, similar to the method described above for the preferred embodiment. However, the plurality of piping 150 is not necessary in the alternative embodiment.
Once substance delivery system 100 is installed on tunnel surface, the structural construction material 200 can be installed directly onto second layer 110.
In the alternative embodiment (not shown) should a failure occur in substance delivery system 100, an operator can drill a plurality of holes through the structural construction material 200, ceasing when second layer 110 is penetrated. Such holes would provide fluid access to intermediate layer 120. A fluid substance (not shown) would then be pumped through the holes, thereby introducing the fluid substance to intermediate member 120. Intermediate layer 120 channels the fluid substance throughout substance delivery system 100, ultimately permitting first layer 130 to permeate the fluid substance therethrough.
The foregoing description of the invention illustrates a preferred embodiment thereof. Various changes may be made in the details of the illustrated construction within the scope of the appended claims without departing from the true spirit of the invention. The present invention should only be limited by the claims and their equivalents.
This application is a divisional of and claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/066,927 entitled, “Device for post-installation in-situ barrier creation and method of use thereof,” filed on Feb. 25, 2005 in the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
741589 | McBean | Oct 1903 | A |
2263070 | Cusick | Nov 1941 | A |
2357769 | Robbins | Sep 1944 | A |
3099911 | Turzillo | Aug 1963 | A |
3137601 | Menzer | Jun 1964 | A |
RE25614 | Turzillo | Jul 1964 | E |
3780975 | Turzillo | Dec 1973 | A |
3844527 | Scott | Oct 1974 | A |
3969852 | Krings | Jul 1976 | A |
3973408 | Paverman | Aug 1976 | A |
3984989 | Turzillo | Oct 1976 | A |
4110151 | Morse | Aug 1978 | A |
4134242 | Musz et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4177618 | Felter | Dec 1979 | A |
4259028 | Cook | Mar 1981 | A |
4370078 | Gadelle et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4386876 | Dupeuble | Jun 1983 | A |
4391555 | Burger et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4391556 | Burger et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4543016 | Tallard | Sep 1985 | A |
4563852 | Achtenberg et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4623283 | Chew | Nov 1986 | A |
4712347 | Sperber | Dec 1987 | A |
4730805 | Yokota et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4754590 | Gordon | Jul 1988 | A |
4787597 | Yokota et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4905441 | Landers | Mar 1990 | A |
4927297 | Simpson | May 1990 | A |
5201612 | Gadelle et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5245812 | Landers | Sep 1993 | A |
5263795 | Corey et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5287674 | Sperber | Feb 1994 | A |
5365716 | Munson | Nov 1994 | A |
5385504 | Hussey et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5450700 | Hackman | Sep 1995 | A |
5725327 | Hussey et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5792552 | Langkamp et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5819496 | Sperber | Oct 1998 | A |
5842519 | Sydansk | Dec 1998 | A |
5891549 | Baretta et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5911539 | Egan et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6202370 | Miller et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6290021 | Strandgaard | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6588986 | Sibilla | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6655107 | Dean | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6662516 | Vandehey et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6691472 | Hubert | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6976804 | Asplin | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7032660 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7077198 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7565779 | Iske et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7584581 | Iske | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20020157344 | Dean | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030161691 | Marshall | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040168802 | Creel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040200173 | Drake | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060010826 | Canteri | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20090126291 | Iske | May 2009 | A1 |
20090282762 | Iske | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2324097 | Feb 1974 | DE |
2841452 | Mar 1980 | DE |
1267035 | Dec 2002 | EP |
WO2005040555 | May 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090274518 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11066927 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 12499564 | US |