Patent Grant
10549015
This application is a National Stage Application of PCT/EP2015/071823 under 35USC § 371 (a), which claims benefit of and priority to European Patent Application Serial No. 14306475.6 filed Sep. 24, 2014, the disclosure of the above-identified application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present invention concerns a method for preparing a film for preventing postsurgical adhesions, as well as the film obtainable by this method. The film of the invention finds application in the field of visceral or parietal surgery. In particular, the film of the invention may be used in association with a prosthetic fabric, as a coating of the fabric, for forming a composite implant intended to be used in parietal surgery, in the repair of eventrations or hernias. The present invention further relates to surgical implants comprising such a film.
Postsurgical adhesions include all non-anatomical fibrous connections accidentally induced by a surgical act during the normal process of healing. They may occur in all surgical disciplines regardless of the operation in question. They are generally all the more severe, the greater the surgical trauma and the more affected the tissues which normally ensure the planes of division (interstitial connective tissue, the synovial membranes, the tendon sheaths, peritoneal and pleural serosa, etc.). Any surgical trauma to tissue is followed by a cascade of physiological events, the main times of which can be simplified as follows:
Although some of the exact mechanisms are still unknown, particularly as regards determination of the intensity of the reaction, it appears that the first few days are decisive since they condition the influx of fibroblasts responsible for the formation of adhesions.
For this reason, such postsurgical adhesions can induce syndromes such as chronic pain, occlusive syndromes and female infertility. Furthermore, they increase very substantially the risks of making errors in follow-up surgery (myocardial or intestinal invasion during repeat thoracotomy or laparotomy), while prolonging the operating times, since the preliminary dissection can be very awkward in such cases.
One solution to this problem consists in interposing a physical barrier between the structures which must not be involved in any adhesion process. Such a physical barrier should anyway show a substantially smooth and nonporous surface, so as not to offer space for cell recolonization and therefore to limit the original cell adhesion.
In order to remedy this problem, hydrophobic and inert artificial polymers have been used, for example expanded PTFE, or absorbable polymer substances, for example those based on hyaluronates, or on modified cellulose, which substances rapidly form a hydrogel by hydration in the body.
Nevertheless, and in particular in visceral and parietal surgery, but also in orthopedic or neurological surgery, the barrier must also have a certain mechanical strength allowing it to fulfill its function as an element of surgical reconstruction and allowing it to be manipulated by the surgeon while limiting the risks that the barrier be damaged. It is also preferable that the barrier show a certain conformability so as to be capable of following the deformations of the implant it is optionally associated with to during the movements of patient.
Prosthetic fabrics used in the treatment of parietal insufficiencies, for example hernias and eventrations, afford an additional mechanical strength to the surgical reconstruction. Such fabrics are usually made from porous textile such as meshes in order to favor cell colonization.
Surgical implants for use in the treatment of hernia therefore usually comprise a porous prosthetic fabric coated on one of its side with an anti-adhesion barrier. For example, the porous side of the implant is intended to face the abdominal wall to be repared, for favoring cell colonization, while the anti-adhesion barrier is intended to face the abdominal cavity so as to avoid post-surgical adhesions.
Anti-adhesion barriers based on films comprising collagenous material are known. Such films are bioresorbable. Indeed, in order to avoid post surgery inflammation, it is advised that the material forming the barrier be rapidly absorbed by the biological tissues after the surgical operation.
There is still a need for a physical barrier for preventing postsurgical adhesions, capable of showing good tensile strength so as to be easily handlable by the surgeon, resistant to potential tearing by sutures, and to have a good conformability. In addition, it is desirable that such a physical barrier be capable of being used as a coating for a prosthetic fabric for example. For example, there is the need of an anti-adhesion barrier such as a film that could be used on its own or as a coating of a prosthetic fabric such as a mesh in oder to form a surgical implant for hernia repair.
The present invention meets this need by proposing a surgical anti-adhesion barrier film and a method for preparing such a film, the film being usable on its own or as a coating of a prosthetic fabric and showing a particular good tensile strength.
A first aspect of the invention is a method for preparing a surgical anti-adhesion barrier film comprising the following steps:)
a°) a first solution, comprising an oxidized collagen at a concentration ranging from 0.5% to 6%, by weight with respect to the total weight of the solution, is prepared,
b) a polyphosphate compound is added to the solution of a) in a quantity so as to obtain a concentration of polyphosphate ranging from 0.007 to 0.7%, by weight, with respect to the total weight of the solution,
c) the pH of the solution obtained in b) is adjusted to about 9 by addition of a base or to about 5.1 by addition of an acid,
d) a diluted solution is prepared by adding water to solution of c) so as to obtain a concentration of oxidized collagen ranging from 0.1% to 2.7%, by weight, with respect to said diluted solution,
e) a first layer of solution obtained in c) is casted on an inert support at a basis weight ranging from 0.03 to 0.4 g/cm2,
f) before complete gelation of the layer obtained in e), a second layer, of diluted solution obtained in d) is applied on top of said first layer at a basis weight ranging from 0.03 to 0.4 g/cm2, and let to gelify,
g) the gelified first and second layers are dried to obtain a film.
Another aspect of the invention is a film obtainable by the method above.
A further aspect of the invention is a surgical implant, for example usable in the treatment of hernia, comprising a biocompatible prosthetic fabric, wherein said prosthetic fabric is at least partially coated with a film obtainable according to the method above.
The method of the invention makes it possible to produce an anti-adhesion barrier film showing a very good tensile strength. In particular, the film obtained by the method of the invention is prepared from a solution comprising a specific collagen, namely an oxidized collagen, and a polyphosphate compound. The film obtained by the method of the invention shows an improved tensile strength compared to films of the prior art based on conventional collagen. In addition, the film obtained by the method of the invention may also show a good elongation at break allowing it to have a good conformability.
According to a first step of the method according to the invention, step a), a solution comprising oxidized collagen is prepared.
The collagen used can be of human or animal origin or may be obtained by genetic recombination means. It may particularly be type I porcine or bovine collagen, or type I or type III human collagen or mixtures in any proportions of the last two types. Native collagen may advantageously be used, in acid solution or after processing, to eliminate the telopeptides, notably by pepsin digestion.
To obtain oxidized collagen, the collagen can be modified by oxidative cleavage using any technique known to those skilled in the art, including, but not limited to the use of periodic acid or one of its salts as described by Tardy et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 4,931,546. Briefly, this technique involves mixing the collagen in acid solution with a solution of periodic acid or one of its salts at a concentration of between 1 and 10−5 M, in embodiments between 5 10−3 and 10−1 M, at a temperature of between 10 and 25° C. for 10 minutes to 72 hours. This process breaks down hydroxylysine and the sugars of the collagen, thus creating reactive sites without causing crosslinking.
The oxidative cleavage of collagen allows moderate cross-linking later in the collagenic material. It should of course be understood that this function may be provided by other means of moderate cross-linking, for example by beta or gamma irradiation, or other agents of moderate cross-linking, for example chemical reagents at suitably low and non-toxic doses. In embodiments, the oxidized collagen is crosslinked, in particular self crosslinked.
Preparation of oxidized collagen is also described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,706,684, in particular at example 4 of this document, and in WO98/34656, in particular at example 1 of this document.
According to the invention, the concentration of oxidized collagen ranges from 0.5% to 6% by weight with respect to the total weight of the solution. Preferably, the concentration of oxidized collagen is 2.7% by weight with respect to the total weight of the solution.
In embodiments, glycerol is added to solution of step a) at a concentration ranging from 0.1% to 1.5%, preferably of 0.9%, by weight with respect to the total weight of the solution.
In embodiments, polyethylene glycol is added to solution of step a) at a concentration ranging from 0.1% to 1.5%, preferably of 0.9%, by weight with respect to the total weight of the solution.
In embodiments, the glycerol is added to solution of step a) at a concentration ranging from 0.1% to 1.0% by weight with respect to the total weight of the solution, and polyethylene glycol is added to solution of step a) at a concentration ranging from 0.1% to 1.5%, preferably of 0.9%, by weight with respect to the total weight of the solution.
The polyethylene glycol may be selected from polyethylene glycols having a molecular weight ranging from 400 to 6000 Daltons.
The presence of glycerol and/or of polyethylene glycol in the oxidized collagen solution allows obtaining a film showing good handling characteristics. The presence of glycerol and/or of polyethylene glycol in the oxidized collagen solution allows limiting the potential brittling of the film obtained.
According to a second step of the method of the invention, step b), a polyphosphate compound is added to the solution of a) in a quantity so as to obtain a concentration of polyphosphate ranging from 0.007 to 0.7%, by weight, with respect to the total weight of the solution.
Polyphosphates are linear inorganic polyanionic polymer containing few to several hundred residues of orthophosphates which are linked by energy-rich phosphoanhydride bonds. Polyphosphates are frequently used in the daily life as chelating salts as sweeteners for food as bacteriostatic, buffer, antioxidant and protein stabilizes. The safety of the polyphosphate for the living body has long been confirmed, and it is known to be a biodegradable substance that degrades in vivo into atoxic phosphoric acids.
Polyphosphates are present in living organisms. They participate in the formation of channels across the living cell membrane. They handle the environmental conditions by providing phosphate and energy reserves of the cells (prokaryotes and eukaryotes). They are present in animal cells (participation in the regulatory processes during development and cellular proliferation and differentiation), play a key role in blood coagulation (platelet release) and they are source of energy (via adenosine triphosphate).
Polyphosphates compounds suitable for the present invention are salts of polyphosphoric acid, namely compounds having a molecular structure wherein hydrogen of a hydroxyl group of the polyphosphoric acid is substituted with a metal. Examples of the metal in this case include sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium.
Polyphosphate compounds suitable for the preparation of the film of the present invention may contain one type or multiple types of the above-described polyphosphoric acids or salts thereof. Examples of the multiple types of polyphosphoric acids or salts thereof include polyphosphoric acids having different polymerization degrees or salts thereof, polyphosphoric acids having different molecular structures or salts thereof, and polyphosphate salts having different metal ions. In addition, the polyphosphate compound may contain both polyphosphoric acids and salts thereof.
The polyphosphate compound suitable for the present invention can be at least one type represented by a general formula, (PnO3n+1)(n+2)— (wherein “n” indicates an integer between 2 and 5000) associated with a metal selected from sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium.
In embodiments, the polyphosphate compound used in the preparation of the film of the invention is a sodium polyphosphate. Preferably, the polyphosphate compound is a sodium polyphosphate having a degree of polymerization (n) varying from 2 to 100, more preferably varying from 2 to 25, and more preferably varying from 5 to 25. Films of the invention prepared from sodium polyphosphate having a degree of polymerization varying from 5 to 25 show a particularly good elongation at break. Such films therefore show a good conformability and are capable once implanted of following the deformations of the biological tissues they are adjacent to, or of the prosthetic fabric they are coated on.
Preferred polyphosphates to be used in the present invention are selected from the group consisting in pentasodium tripolyphosphate (Na5P3O10), sodium hexametaphosphate having a degree of polymerization of 13 (NaPO3)13, sodium hexametaphosphate having a degree of polymerization of 25 (NaPO3)25, and mixtures thereof.
The addition of the polyphosphate compound to the oxidized collagen solution of a) in a quantity so as to obtain a concentration of polyphosphate ranging from 0.007 to 0.7%, by weight, with respect to the total weight of the solution allows the formation in the solution of a soluble ionic complex oxidized collagen/polyphosphate compound. The solution obtained in the present step b) is therefore homogeneous and will enable the formation of a homogeneous film in the subsequent steps of the method.
According to a third step of the method of the invention, step c), the pH of the solution obtained in b) is adjusted to about 9 by addition of a base or to about 5.1 by addition of an acid.
It is known that the extractible pH after sterilization of polymeric films is dependent on the method of sterilization used. The films of the invention may be sterilized for example by ethylene oxide or by gamma radiation. In addition, it is advisable that the sterilized films show an extractible pH after sterilization of about 7 in order to maintain good mechanical properties of the film and in order to obtain films suitable for implantation in a human body. In this view, when it is intended to sterilize the film by ethylene oxide, it is advised to set the pH of the oxidized collagen/polyphosphate solution at pH 5.1 in order to obtain a pH around 7 after sterilization. On the contrary, when it is intended to sterilize the film by gamma radiation, it is advised to set the pH of the oxidized collagen/polyphosphate solution at pH 9 in order to obtain a pH around 7 after sterilization.
During the present step c), the pH of the solution may be adjusted to 9 by addition of the adequate amount of base, for example NaOH (1N). Alternatively, the pH of the solution may be adjusted to 5.1 by addition of the adequate amount of acid, for example HCl (1N).
According to a fourth step of the method of the invention, step d), a diluted solution is prepared by adding water to solution of c) so as to obtain a concentration of oxidized collagen ranging from 0.1% to 2.7%, preferably of 1.75%, by weight, with respect to said diluted solution.
The diluted solution thus prepared is intended to be used for the casting of the film, in a further step, step f). As such, the present step d) of preparation of the diluted solution may be completed at any time between step a) and step f).
The solution of step c) and the diluted solution of step e) are intended to be used in two superposed thin layers for the formation of the film of the invention. These thin layers have generally a very low thickness, for example ranging from 1 to 100 μm and are for example obtained by depositing a determined weight of solution per a determined surface area. In this view, one defines a basis weight of these thin layers, similar to a bidimensional or surface density, expressed in g/cm2.
As such, according to a fifth step of the method of the invention, step e), a first layer of solution obtained in c) is casted on an inert support at a basis weight ranging from 0.03 to 0.4 g/cm2, preferably of about 0.11 g/cm2.
The inert support may be a flat hydrophobic support of dimensions adapted to the desired dimensions of the resulting film.
After the first layer has partially gelled by cooling, for example, after 45 min at a temperature of 20° C., a second thin layer is applied to its surface, this being based on the diluted solution. As such, according to a sixth step of the method of the invention, step f), before complete gelation of the layer obtained in e), a second layer, of diluted solution obtained in d) is applied on top of said first layer at a basis weight ranging from 0.03 to 0.4 g/cm2, preferably of about 0.064 g/cm2.
The first and second layers are then let to gelify. The gelation may take between 5 and 45 minutes at a temperature of around 20° C.
According to a seventh step of the invention, step g), the gelified first and second layers are dried to obtain a film. The drying may be completed under laminated flow at 20° C., with a hygrometric degree of 40% and for about 20 hours.
In embodiments, wherein in step c) the pH of the solution obtained in b) is adjusted to about 9, the film obtained at g) is further sterilized by gamma radiation. For example, the film may be submitted to gamma radiation with a dose ranging from 25 to 50 kGy.
In alternative embodiments, wherein in step c) the pH of the solution obtained in b) is adjusted to about 5.1, the film obtained at g) is further sterilized by ethylene oxide. For example, the film is sterilized by ethylene oxide at 30° C. for 12 hours.
Films of the invention sterilized by ethylene oxide show an improved elongation at break compared to films of the invention which are sterilized by gamma radiation. As a consequence, when films showing a certain elasticity will be needed, it will be preferable to sterilize the films of the invention by ethylene oxide. Such films with elastic properties may be needed for example for use in combination with an elastic prosthetic fabric, or simply for their good conformability allowing them to smoothly follow the deformations of the surrounding biological tissues.
In embodiments, and regardless of the method of sterilization used, the sterilized film may be cured in order to reinforce its mechanical properties. For example, the sterilized film is baked at 40° C. for 48 hours.
The film obtained by the method of the invention is preferably continuous, smooth and nonporous.
The film obtained by the method of the invention is bioabsorbable. In the present application, “bioabsorbable” is understood to mean that the materials having this property are absorbed and/or degraded by the tissues or washed from the implantation site and disappear in vivo after a certain time, which may vary, for example, from a few hours to a few months, depending on the chemical nature of the materials.
The rapid absorption of the film obtained by the method of the invention ensures protection against the initial adhesive phenomena, that is to say in the first week following surgery, or in other words during the period of time necessary for the integration of the opposite surface.
The films of the invention may be used on their own as anti-adhesive barriers to be implanted in a patient for preventing post-surgical adhesions. The films of the invention show a good tensile strength and may therefore easily be manipulated by surgeons during a surgical operation. In addition, thanks to their good tensile strength, the films of the invention also offer a good resistance to potential tearing by sutures and fixation devices as tacks, when they are fixed to biological tissues. The films of the invention further show a good elongation at break conferring them a good flexibility and may therefore be particularly useful in case a good conformability is needed.
The films of the invention may also be used in combination with any medical device necessitating an anti-adhesive barrier. For example, the films of the invention may be associated to a biocompatible prosthetic fabric in order to manufacture a composite implant for the treatment of hernias.
A prosthetic fabric may comprise, for example, two opposed porous faces, separated from each other by the thickness of said fabric, but connected to each other by linking yarns. The prosthetic fabric may be bioabsorbable or permanent.
The film of the invention may be coated on one face of the prosthetic fabric, either during the manufacturing of the film, or thereafter. The film may be linked at least on the surface of a face of the prosthetic fabric, and preferably over a certain thickness, for example by capillary absorption of the constituent fibers in the prosthetic fabric. The film may entirely cover a face of the prosthetic fabric, and more preferably projects beyond the edges of the latter in such a way as to protect the resulting implant from visceral contacts, the overlap being from 5 to 10 millimeters for example.
Advantageously, the thickness of the film is less than the thickness of the prosthetic fabric, for example between 2% and 20% of the total thickness of the composite implant.
For example, as a result, the surgical implant of the invention may comprise two faces which are different in their respective appearances and functions, namely one face which is porous or open on one side, in order to accommodate and direct the postsurgical cell colonization, and the other face which is closed by the film of the invention, for tissue separation without adhesion.
Because of its good elongation at break and resulting good flexibility, the film of the invention preserves the manipulability of the implant when it is associated to a prosthetic fabric. The implant may therefore be implanted by the coelioscopic route.
The advantages of the present invention will more clearly appear from the examples below.
In the examples below, parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
In the present example, films of the invention comprising oxidized collagen and a polyphosphate at various concentrations are prepared. The influence of the type of sterilization (either by ethylene oxide or by gamma radiation) on the elongation at break of the resulting films is studied.
1°) Preparation of the Solutions:
A solution of oxidized collagen is prepared according to example 4 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,706,684 with a final concentration of oxidized collagen of 4.1%. The solution is heated at 37° C. A glycerol solution in water is prepared at 10%. The oxidized collagen solution is diluted with the glycerol solution at a proportion of 88/12. Initial pH is around 3.3 and is then adjusted to 8.94 with a NaOH solution (1N). The solution of oxidized collagen/glycerol is diluted with water to obtain a final concentration of oxidized collagen equal to 2.7% and a final concentration of glycerol equal to 0.9%.
Solutions S1-S5 are then prepared by adding to the solution above sodium hexametaphosphate with a degree of polymerization equal to 13 ((NaPO3)13) in various concentrations, so as to obtain the final concentrations of (NaPO3)13 in the solution as shown in the table below:
It is known that the extractible pH after sterilization of the films is dependent on the type of sterilization used. In this view, when it is intended to sterilize the film by ethylene oxide, it is advised to set the pH of the solution at pH 5.1 in order to obtain a pH around 7 after sterilization. On the contrary, when it is intended to sterilize the film by gamma radiation, it is advised to set the pH of the solution at pH 9 in order to obtain a pH around 7 after sterilization.
In this view, depending on the intended type of sterilization, solutions S1-S5 were readjusted either to pH 9 with addition of NaOH solution (1N), or to pH 5.1 by addition of HCl (1N) and are respectively referred to as S′1, S′2, S′3, S′4 and S′5. For each of these solutions, diluted solutions at 1.75% of oxidized collagen by addition of water are prepared and respectively referred to as S″1, S″2, S″3, S″4 and S″5.
2°) Manufacture of the Films:
A film F1 is prepared according to the following method: a first layer of solution S′1 is casted on an inert support at a basis weight of 0.11 g/cm2. Before complete gelation of this first layer, for example after 45 min, a second layer, of diluted solution S″1, is applied on top of the first layer at a basis weight of 0.064 g/cm2.
After gelation of the two layers, the whole is dried under laminated flow at 20° C., hygrometric degree of 40% for 20 hours. A film F1 is obtained.
Films F2, F3, F4 and F5 are prepared in the same manner with respectively solutions S′2-S′5 and S″2-S″5.
3°) Sterilization and Curing:
Sterilization by Ethylene Oxide:
Films F1-F5 obtained at step 2°) from solutions of pH 5.1 were sterilized by ethylene oxide at 30° C. for 12 hours. The films are then cured at 40° C. for 48 hours.
Sterilization by Gamma Radiation
Films F1-F5 obtained at step 2°) from solutions of pH 9 were sterilized by gamma radiation with a dose of 25 kGy. The films are then cured at 40° C. for 48 hours.
4°) Mechanical Tests:
The tensile strength and elongation at break of the above films were evaluated according to the following protocol: for each film, dogbone shaped samples are prepared. Samples are hydrated with a saline solution of NaCl at 0.9% for 5 minutes. Each sample is placed between the jaws (one fixed, one mobile) of a traction machine Tinius Olsen (model Benchtop Tester). The distance between the two jaws is calibrated at 9 cm. The cell measurement limit is 5 N. The preload is fixed at 0.005 N. A constant extension speed of 50 mm/min is then applied to the mobile jaw until the sample breaks.
The tensile strength is the measured force F necessary to achieve breaking of the sample.
The elongation at break is the deformation in percentage of the length of the sample when it breaks.
The results are collated in the table below, in which the values indicated for the elongation at break in percentage correspond to the mean of 20 tests for each film.
These results show that the elongation at break is greater for the films which have been sterilized by ethylene oxide. Therefore sterilization by ethylene oxide may be preferred when films having a greater elongation are needed, depending on the function desired for the film.
Films of the invention prepared in the present example may be used on their own as an anti-adhesive barrier to be implanted in a patient for preventing post-surgical adhesions. Alternatively, these films may be used in combination with a prosthetic fabric in order to manufacture a composite surgical implant. For example, surgical implants for the treatment of hernia may be prepared by coating one face of a prosthetic fabric, such as a mesh, with a film of the present example. The coated film therefore serves as an anti-adhesive barrier for preventing post-surgical adhesions after implantation of the surgical implant.
In the present example, comparative films comprising a non oxidized collagen and the same polyphosphate as in Example 1 at various concentrations are prepared and sterilized either by ethylene oxide or by gamma radiation.
The respective tensile strengths of the comparative films and of the films of the invention are compared.
Comparative films are prepared from solutions comprising a polyphosphate and non oxidized collagen.
Solutions of collagen and glycerol with a final concentration of collagen equal to 2.7% and a final concentration of glycerol equal to 0.9% are prepared in the same manner as in Example 1, except for the fact that the oxidized collagen of Example 1 is replaced by a non oxidized collagen. The non oxidized collagen used is a collagen which has been heated to 60° C. but which has not been modified.
Solutions C1-C3 are then prepared by adding to the solution above sodium hexametaphosphate with a degree of polymerization equal to 13 ((NaPO3)13) in various concentrations, so as to obtain the final concentrations of (NaPO3)13 in the solution as shown in the table below:
Like in Example 1, solutions C1-C3 were readjusted to specific pHs depending on the intended type of sterilization and are respectively referred to hereinafter as C′1, C′2, and C′3. Because the non oxidized collagen of the present example is unstable and degrades at pH 9, solutions C1-C3 intended to be used for films intended to be sterilized by gamma radiation were readjusted to pH 7 with addition of NaOH solution (1N). Solutions C1-C3 intended to be used for films intended to be sterilized by ethylene oxide were readjusted to pH 5.1 by addition of HCl (1N). For each of solutions C′1, C′2, and C′3, diluted solutions at 1.75% of non oxidized collagen by addition of water are prepared and respectively referred to as C″1, C″2, and C″3.
Films were prepared in the same manner as in Example 1 from respectively solutions C′1-C′3 and C″1-C″3.
The obtained films are referred to as FC1, FC2 and FC3.
Films FC1, FC2 and FC3 obtained from solutions of pH 5.1 were sterilized by ethylene oxide at 30° C. for 12 hours. The films were then cured at 40° C. for 48 hours.
Films FC1, FC2 and FC3 obtained from solutions of pH 7 were sterilized by gamma radiation with a dose of 25 kGy. The films were then cured at 40° C. for 48 hours.
Mechanical tests were performed on Films FC1-FC3 in the same manner as in Example 1.
The table below compares the results obtained for the tensile strength of films F1, F2 and F5 of the invention of Example 1 and of films FC1, FC2 and FC3 (comparative), for ethylene oxide sterilization on one hand and for gamma radiation sterilization on the other hand. The values indicated for the tensile strength correspond to the mean of 20 tests for each film.
In this table, F1 is to be compared to FC1, F2 is to be compared to FC2 and F5 is to be compared to FC3.
These results show that the tensile strength of the films of the invention is much greater than that of comparative films prepared from non oxidized collagen, independently from the fact that the films have been sterilized by ethylene oxide or by gamma radiations.
In the present example, films of the invention comprising oxidized collagen and phosphate/polyphosphates of various degrees of polymerization and at various concentrations are prepared and further sterilized either by ethylene oxide or by gamma radiation. The influence of the degree of polymerization on the elongation at break of the resulting films is studied.
The films are prepared in the same manner as in Example 1, by varying the phosphate/polyphosphate used. The following phosphate/polyphosphates are used:
For each phosphate/polyphosphate used, two concentrations in the final solution are tested: 0.11% and 0.22%. In addition, in order to optimize the comparison between the types of phosphate/polyphosphates, the same corresponding concentrations in orthophosphates (PO4) were kept for each phosphate/polyphosphate from concentration 0.11% to concentration 0.22%/
Films prepared from (NaPO3)13 are films F3 and F4. The other films prepared are referred to as films F6-F11. The elongations at break of the resulting films are measured in the same manner as described in Example 1. The results are collected in the following table:
These results show that films of the invention prepared from polyphosphates having a degree of polymerization ranging from 5 to 25 show an improved elongation at break with respect to films prepared from Na2HPO4.
Films of the invention prepared in the present example may be used on their own as an anti-adhesive barrier to be implanted in a patient for preventing post-surgical adhesions. Alternatively, these films may be used in combination with a prosthetic fabric in order to manufacture a composite surgical implant. For example, surgical implants for the treatment of hernia may be prepared by coating one face of a prosthetic fabric, such as a mesh, with a film of the present example. The coated film therefore serves as an anti-adhesive barrier for preventing post-surgical adhesions after implantation of the surgical implant.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14306475 | Sep 2014 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2015/071823 | 9/23/2015 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2016/046251 | 3/31/2016 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3118294 | Van Laethem | Jan 1964 | A |
| 3276448 | Usher | Oct 1966 | A |
| 3320649 | Naimer | May 1967 | A |
| 3364200 | Ashton et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
| 4006747 | Kronenthal et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4060081 | Yannas et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4307717 | Hymes et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4500676 | Balazs et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4603695 | Ikada et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4704131 | Noishiki et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4769038 | Bendavid et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4796603 | Dahlke et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4813942 | Alvarez | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4854316 | Davis | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4931546 | Tardy et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4950483 | Ksander et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5002551 | Linsky et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5192301 | Kamiya et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5201764 | Kelman et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5217493 | Raad et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5254133 | Seid | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5256418 | Kemp et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5263983 | Yoshizato et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5306500 | Rhee et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5328955 | Rhee et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5350583 | Yoshizato et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5368549 | McVicker | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5376375 | Rhee et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5376376 | Li | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5399361 | Song et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5413791 | Rhee et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5428022 | Palefsky et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5433996 | Kranzler et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5536656 | Kemp et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5565210 | Rosenthal et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5580923 | Yeung et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5593441 | Lichtenstein et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5595621 | Light et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5601571 | Moss | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5618551 | Tardy et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5658582 | Dorigatti et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5667839 | Berg | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5681568 | Goldin et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5686115 | Vournakis et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5690675 | Sawyer et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5697978 | Sgro | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5709934 | Bell et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5716409 | Debbas | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5766631 | Arnold | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5785983 | Furlan et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5791352 | Reich et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5800541 | Rhee et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5843470 | Reeve et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5861034 | Taira et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5863984 | Doillon et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5871767 | Dionne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5876444 | Lai | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5931165 | Reich et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5962136 | Dewez et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5993844 | Abraham et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5997895 | Narotam et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6004333 | Sheffield et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6034088 | Reeve et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6042592 | Schmitt | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6056970 | Greenawalt et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6083522 | Chu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6120539 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6153292 | Bell et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6165488 | Tardy et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6197935 | Doillon et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6221109 | Geistlich et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6224616 | Kugel | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6258124 | Darois et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6262332 | Ketharanathan | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264702 | Ory | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6277397 | Shimizu | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6312474 | Francis et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6383201 | Dong | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6391333 | Li et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6391939 | Tayot et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6399624 | Reeve et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6408656 | Ory et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6410044 | Chudzik et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6413742 | Olsen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6428978 | Olsen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6440167 | Shimizu | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6443964 | Ory et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6447551 | Goldmann | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6451032 | Ory et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6454787 | Maddalo et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6500464 | Ceres et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6509031 | Miller et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6514286 | Leatherbury et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6540773 | Dong | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6548081 | Sadozai et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6554855 | Dong | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6576019 | Atala | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6596304 | Bayon et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6599524 | Li et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6599526 | Dimitrijevich | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6599690 | Abraham et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6652594 | Francis et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6653450 | Berg et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6682760 | Noff et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6706684 | Bayon et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6730299 | Tayot et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6743435 | DeVore et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6773723 | Spiro et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6790438 | Constancis et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6790454 | Abdul Malak et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6893653 | Abraham et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6949525 | Hermida | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6974679 | Andre et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6974862 | Ringeisen et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7025063 | Snitkin et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7041868 | Greene et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| RE39172 | Bayon et al. | Jul 2006 | E |
| 7098315 | Schaufler | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7175852 | Simmoteit et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7214765 | Ringeisen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7226611 | Yura et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 10335257 | Rizk | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 20010008930 | Tayot et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010018618 | Ketharanathan | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010053839 | Noishiki et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020013408 | Rhee et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049503 | Milbocker | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020095218 | Carr et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020119177 | Bowman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120348 | Melican et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020127265 | Bowman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020131933 | Delmotte | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030013989 | Obermiller et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023316 | Brown et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030086975 | Ringeisen | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114937 | Leatherbury et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030133967 | Ruszczak et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030147935 | Binette et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149173 | Rhee et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030152522 | Miller et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030193104 | Melican et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030203485 | Takezawa et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212460 | Darois et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030225355 | Butler | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030232746 | Lamberti et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040001877 | Li et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040002444 | Shiba | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040013712 | Parma | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040018175 | Dimitrijevich | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040037866 | Semertzides et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054406 | Dubson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040059356 | Gingras | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040101546 | Gorman et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040105880 | Turner et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040138762 | Therin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181288 | Darois et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050002893 | Goldmann | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050009178 | Yost et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021058 | Negro | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085924 | Darois et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137512 | Campbell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050142161 | Freeman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050148963 | Brennan | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050175659 | Macomber et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050232979 | Shoshan | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267521 | Forsberg | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060094318 | Matsuda et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135921 | Wiercinski et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060147501 | Hillas et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167561 | Odar et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060216320 | Kitazono et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060252981 | Matsuda et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070031474 | Tayot | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070161109 | Archibald et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070280990 | Stopek | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20120197415 | Montanari | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20140257348 | Priewe | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140257517 | Deichmann | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150045507 | Bender | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20170157296 | Walmsley | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0372969 | Jun 1990 | EP |
| 0552576 | Jul 1993 | EP |
| 0614650 | Sep 1994 | EP |
| 0621014 | Oct 1994 | EP |
| 0625891 | Nov 1994 | EP |
| 0669138 | Aug 1995 | EP |
| 0705878 | Apr 1996 | EP |
| 0774240 | May 1997 | EP |
| 0797962 | Oct 1997 | EP |
| 827724 | Mar 1998 | EP |
| 0836838 | Apr 1998 | EP |
| 0895762 | Feb 1999 | EP |
| 898944 | Mar 1999 | EP |
| 1216718 | Jun 2002 | EP |
| 0693523 | Nov 2002 | EP |
| 1315468 | Jun 2003 | EP |
| 1484070 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| 1500664 | Jan 2005 | EP |
| 1561480 | Aug 2005 | EP |
| 1782848 | May 2007 | EP |
| 2244853 | Apr 1975 | FR |
| 2715405 | Jul 1995 | FR |
| 2 724 563 | Mar 1996 | FR |
| 8908467 | Sep 1989 | WO |
| 9311805 | Jun 1993 | WO |
| 9318174 | Sep 1993 | WO |
| 9518638 | Jul 1995 | WO |
| 9608277 | Mar 1996 | WO |
| 9614805 | May 1996 | WO |
| 9641588 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| 9729715 | Aug 1997 | WO |
| 9735533 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| WO 9834656 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| 9849967 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| 9906079 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| 9906080 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| 9951163 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| 0016821 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| 0115625 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| 03002168 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| 2004078120 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| 05112820 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2006018552 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006023444 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2007048099 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2011026987 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report for PCT/EP2015/071823 date of completion is Oct. 6, 2015 (2 pages). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170252490 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |
