The invention relates to a method of powder coating materials. More specifically, the invention relates to a process of taking a part made of powder coated MDF (or other substrate containing wood) and preparing it to accept a buffing treatment, with the end goal of enhancing the final smoothness of finish.
Powder coating is a type of coating that is applied as a free-flowing, dry powder. The main difference between a conventional liquid paint and a powder coating is that the powder coating is stored as a solid and does not need to be kept in a liquid form (using such liquids as a water base or solvent) in order to keep the binder and filler particles in suspension. The coating is typically applied electrostatically and is then cured under heat to allow it to flow and form a “skin” around all or part of the substrate. The powder may be a thermoplastic, thermoset, or a UV polymer. It is usually used to create a hard finish that is tougher than conventional paint. Powder coating is mainly used for coating of metals, such as household appliances, aluminum extrusions, and automobile and bicycle parts. Newer technologies allow other materials, such as MDF (medium-density fiberboard) to be powder coated using different methods. There are several advantages of powder coating over conventional liquid coatings:
While powder coatings have many advantages over other coating processes, there are some disadvantages to the technology. Although the powder is relatively easy to apply in a single thick coating, a single powder coat is not as smooth as a similarly thick liquid paint finish; however, to achieve a similarly thick liquid paint finish it is necessary to apply multiple coats with sanding between each coat. Furthermore, the application of multiple powder coats serves to further increase the thickness of the coating, but does not reliably enhance the visual or tactile smoothness of the powder coated finish.
Many manufacturers of powder coated MDF have taken various steps in the past in order to improve the smoothness of the finish. Methods include:
The aforementioned methods have indeed resulted in incrementally increased smoothness relative to previously existing methods. Employing any or all of these methods, however, results in a maximum surface smoothness in the 4-6 range on the PCI scale.
In such industries as furniture and cabinetry, there is growing demand for increasingly smooth finishes. Traditionally, this demand has been met through such finishes as laminates, veneers, vinyl wraps, or liquid paints. These traditional finishes have their own shortcomings and powder coated MDF is frequently a more desirable choice for durability or part design needs. Furthermore, powder coated MDF is free of HAPs, VOCs, and PVCs, some or all of which are contained in many traditional wood finishes. Nonetheless, it is not currently possible to achieve similar smoothness in powder coated MDF finishes regardless of content or steps.
Therefore, there exists a need for a method of preparing and buffing an item made of powder coated MDF in order to enhance visual and tactile smoothness.
The invention relates to a method for preparing and buffing an item made of powder coated MDF in order to enhance visual and tactile smoothness. Compared with untreated powder coated MDF, the resulting finish is significantly smoother than other known powder coated finishes.
The invention includes the steps of cutting and machining the part, pre-powder preparation and sanding of the part, powder coating the part, post-powder preparation and sanding, and buffing the treated part.
The idea of buffing powder coated MDF in order to enhance surface smoothness is novel and is not known to have been employed before this discovery; further, it results in a smoothness rating in the range of 9-10 on the PCI scale, a smoothness that is not currently attainable with existing powder coated MDF finishes. The applicant knows of no attempts to treat the surface of a powder coated wood part in any way after coating with the ultimate goal of increasing surface smoothness.
In one embodiment, the invention includes a method for treating a powder coated part to enhance visual and tactile smoothness. The method comprising the steps of obtaining a part that is fabricated from a substrate containing wood, cutting and machining the part to a desired size utilizing equipment that has a tolerance that is less than +/−0.030″, pre-powder preparation and sanding of the part by utilizing a sander to smooth the faces and edges of the part, whereby the sander has a Y-axis tolerance of less than 0.003″, and wherein the edges are sanded to a minimum radius of 1/32″ (0.8 mm), powder coating the part, post-powder preparation and sanding of the part to a PCI smoothness of at least 6 using an abrasive, buffing the part to achieve a PCI smoothness of at least 7.
In another embodiment, the invention includes a method for treating a powder coating a part to enhance visual and tactile smoothness comprising the steps of obtaining a part that is fabricated from medium-density fiberboard, cutting and machining the part to a desired size utilizing equipment that has a tolerance that is less than +/−0.030″, pre-powder preparation and sanding of the part by utilizing a sander to smooth the faces and edges of the part, whereby the sander has a Y-axis tolerance of less than 0.003″, and wherein the edges are sanded to a minimum radius of 1/32″ (0.8 mm), and wherein the part is first sanded with a 220 grit aluminum oxide, silicon carbide media, then sanded with a 280 grit aluminum oxide, silicon carbide media, then sanded with a 320 grit aluminum oxide, silicon carbide media, powder coating the part, whereby the part is heated to a temperature between 150 and 350 degrees Fahrenheit to create an electrostatic charge, wherein powder is applied to the part and the part is then allowed to cure, resulting in a part that is coated with at least 5 mils of coverage about its surfaces and edges, post-powder preparation and sanding of the part using an abrasive having a minimum grit size of 15μ, whereby the edges of the part are sanded and whereby the faces of the part are sanded to a PCI smoothness of at least 7, and buffing the part; whereby the part has a PCI smoothness of at least 7.
In yet another embodiment, the invention includes a powder coated article having enhanced visual and tactile smoothness. The article comprises a substrate containing wood, a surface coating with PCI smoothness of at least 6 formed by the process of cutting and machining the part to a desired size utilizing equipment that has a tolerance that is less than +/−0.030″, pre-powder preparation and sanding of the part by utilizing a sander to smooth the faces and edges of the part, whereby the sander has a Y-axis tolerance of less than 0.003″, and wherein the edges are sanded to a minimum radius of 1/32″ (0.8 mm), powder coating the part, whereby the part is coated with at least 5 mils of coverage about its surfaces and edges, post-powder preparation and sanding of the part using an abrasive, and whereby the edges of the part are sanded and whereby the faces of the part are sanded to a PCI smoothness of at least 6, buffing the part using a rotary buffer with a speed of 1800 revolutions per minute.
In order for the advantages of the invention to be readily understood, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments that are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings, in which:
The invention relates to a method for preparing and buffing an item made of powder coated MDF in order to enhance visual and tactile smoothness. Compared with untreated powder coated MDF, the resulting finish is significantly smoother than existing known methods:
For the purposes of this application, “smoothness” refers to the visual detectability of smoothness or lack of “orange peel” in a finished surface. ACT Test Panels Inc. manufacturers the PCI smoothness scale for powder coated finishes. This scale is commonly employed by a wide variety of industries to compare visual smoothness of painted finishes. The scale ranges from 1-10, with 1 being a heavy texture and 10 being completely smooth (glass-like). For the purposes of this application, “failure” is meant to describe a situation resulting in a less-than-ideal finish. Failures can include situations such as sanding through the coating to the bare substrate, or a final smoothness that is less than PCI 9-10; PCI 9-10 is a smoothness range which is higher than is currently attainable with any other existing untreated powder coated MDF finish. For the purposes of this application, “untreated” refers to a standard powder coated MDF part that has not been modified in any way after the standard coating has been applied. “Treated” refers to powder coated MDF parts that have received the additional steps outlined in this application.
The overall process and decision points involved in the present invention is shown in
The first step of cutting and machining the part will now be discussed. In this step, MDF components are machined (cut to drawn shapes and designs) from purchased sheet stock in powder coat grade, available from a variety of milling operations. MDF sheet brands and thicknesses are variable and are not critical to this process. Machining operations generally utilize such equipment as CNC routers, CNC point-to-point drilling/milling equipment, through feed molding machines, shapers, hand routers, panel saws, sliding table saws, and fixed table saws. The parts to be coated can be any shape designed from flat sheet material, provided the design fits within tolerances and parameters outlined herein.
Success of the sanding, preparation, coating, and post-coating processes is dependent on the initial quality of the machining “Quality of Machining” is defined as:
The second step of pre-powder coating preparation and sanding will now be discussed. The face and edge preparation treatments are important to the final quality and appearance of the finished parts and should be considered as part of this invention; this step is material to the invention because omission of the step can leave surface irregularities and contamination on the surface of the board to be coated. These irregularities are subsequently covered by the powder coating but can then be exposed when sanding after powder coating. The result is an increased probability of sanding through to the surface contamination, demonstrating visible speckling or color irregularity and resulting in a part failure. Parts that have been appropriately sanded as described are illustrated in
In this pre-powder coating preparation and sanding step, the part faces are sanded using a wide belt sander, a wide belt veneer segmented platen sander, a wide orbital machine sander, a random orbital hand sander, or a combination of this sanding (or other surface smoothing) equipment. Grit types and sizes can vary based upon the abrasive manufacturer and the equipment being utilized. The edges are prepared in a similar manner with like grit materials using machine edge sanding equipment utilizing belts, disks, profiled sanding heads or other proprietary sanding techniques specific to the machine manufacturer and dictated by suitability with shape of part being sanded. The specific abrasive material, manufacturer, and equipment is not critical and can be varied while remaining within the scope of the invention.
The following steps should ideally be taken to ensure proper pre-powder coating part preparation:
The step of powder coating the MDF substrate will now be discussed. There are a variety of known methods to powder coat components machined from MDF. The overall process described herein can be applied to known powder coated MDF finishes in general, regardless of basic powder coating method used. A powder coated MDF finish can be obtained by heating the substrate to a consistent temperature in order to create an electrostatic charge, applying the powder, and allowing it to cure. Alternately, UV can be used to coat via a UV-cured powder coating process while remaining within the scope of the invention. As previously described, the method of powder coating is not critical to the overall invention described herein. The preferred embodiment in these step is that surfaces and edges should optimally have at least 7-8 mils of coating coverage; otherwise, post coating sanding may sand through the coating, exposing the raw wood substrate and resulting in a failure.
A main reason why powder coating is critical to the process of the present invention is that powder coating results in a thicker coating per coat on a wood substrate than liquid paints. Furthermore, the powder coated finish is harder than that of a liquid paint, so it can be sanded more consistently without “burning through” the coating. It is theoretically possible that 5-8 mils of paint thickness could be achieved using a liquid paint, but it would require multiple base coats—in many cases, at least 4-6 base coats. Comparatively, powder coatings with a thickness of 5-8 mils can routinely be achieved using a one-pass (one coat) powder coat process.
The step of post-powder preparation and sanding of the coated part will now be discussed. After the powder coat is applied, it is optimal to follow specific steps of the sanding process as described herein in order to achieve the desired finish. This is one of the most critical aspects of the entire process of the present invention.
In the preferred embodiment of this post-powder sanding step, the edges of the part are sanded first, as demonstrated in
Once the edges of the part have been sanded using the abrasive methods described herein, the face of the part are then ready to be sanded. In this step, the face of the component is sanded using an abrasive method as demonstrated in
In a preferred embodiment, wide belt veneer segmented platen sanders with the Cross Belt Finish (CBF) technology are employed when sanding the face; this equipment is preferred because it results in the most reliable outcome with the least amount of fallout and required rework, as shown in
It is possible that a variety of other face and edge sanding equipment could be utilized while remaining within the scope of the invention, however the specific equipment listed herein has been tested for repeatable success. Further, it is possible to achieve a lesser quality finish (but still smoother than untreated powder coated MDF) using a variety of other abrasive equipment, grits, sequences, and process order changes (such as sanding the face before the edges). For example, using coarser abrasive grits will leave minute scratches in the finish; these minute scratches are considered a failure, although the finish may still be smoother than the untreated powder coated part. Conversely, PCI smoothness of 9-10 with no scratches or failures is routinely and reliably attainable using the method described herein.
Once the face and edges achieve the desired smoothness as shown in
Once the face of the part has been buffed through the steps described herein, the edges of the part can be buffed. First, a small amount of rubbing compound is applied to the edges. Next, the edges are buffed using buffing equipment until all visible abrasive scratches have been removed. In order to remove any residual rotary buffing residue, a small amount of polish is applied to the part and the polish is buffed using a polishing pad. In a preferred embodiment, the equipment and supplies used are in accordance with those set forth in
The preferred embodiment of this invention describes specific buffing products and buffing equipment. However, similar results can be achieved with other buffing products and buffing equipment while still remaining within the scope of the invention; furthermore, the order in which the part is buffed (faces before edges or vice versa) and whether certain parts of the component are left without buffing (such as the back side) is immaterial to the invention as described.
Buffing processes applied to powder coated MDF, without first employing the specific treatments outlined in this application, would result in inferior outcomes dependent on the steps omitted. Following are some examples of outcomes when omitting one of the steps outlined in this application:
Conversely, simply sanding the powder coated MDF part without buffing the surface will result in a “chalky”, delicate finish that does not have the uniform reflective characteristics of the final buffed finish. Furthermore, a wide variety of abrasive grit numbers and sequences have been tested; those grit numbers and sequences not outlined in this application either result in lesser smoothness ratings or result in a coating failure. The only known method to reliably improve PCI smoothness of a powder coated MDF finish without applying further top coat(s) is to follow the pre- and post-coating steps as well as the abrasive grit number and sequences outlined in this document.
A sheet of powder coat grade MDF is cut by a CNC router with new condition solid carbide tooling into a rectangle with dimensions of 12″W, 18″L, 0.75″ thickness. Edge profiles are shaped to 1/16″ radius; the faces and edges of the part are sanded with an automated sanding machine using the grit sequences and steps set forth in
After powder coating, the face of the coated part is sanded with a veneer segmented platen sander and wide orbital machine sander operated in tandem. An abrasive grit sequence is followed with the corresponding piece of equipment as represented in
After the above sanding sequences, the part is buffed using an 1800 RPM rotary buffer with a 3M Brand 82531 Finesse-it Buffing Pad and 3M Brand 06060 Perfect-it 3000 Extra Cut Rubbing Compound. The edges are buffed with a 3″ 3M Brand 08125 air buffing tool with an orange foam buffing pad and 3M Brand 06060 Perfect-it 3000 Extra Cut Rubbing Compound. Finally, both the face and the edges are polished with a 3M Brand 05725 Perfect-it Foam Polishing Pad and 3M Brand Finesse-it Extra Fine Polish. The resulting part has a PCI smoothness of 10 and the visual depth comparable to a 5-coat wet sanded liquid paint finish.
A sheet of powder coat grade MDF is cut by a CNC router with new condition solid carbide tooling into a rectangle with dimensions of 12″W, 18″L, 0.75″ thickness. Edge profiles are shaped to 1/16″ radius; the faces and edges of the part are sanded with an automated sanding machine using the grit sequences and steps set forth in
In this example the post-powder sanding steps are omitted and the part is taken straight to the buffing step. The part is buffed using an 1800 RPM rotary buffer with a 3M Brand 82531 Finesse-it Buffing Pad and 3M Brand 06060 Perfect-it 3000 Extra Cut Rubbing Compound. The edges are buffed with a 3″ 3M Brand 08125 air buffing tool with an orange foam buffing pad and 3M Brand 06060 Perfect-it 3000 Extra Cut Rubbing Compound. Finally, both the face and the edges are polished with a 3M Brand 05725 Perfect-it Foam Polishing Pad and 3M Brand Finesse-it Extra Fine Polish. The resulting part is slightly shinier in appearance but the surface has an unchanged PCI smoothness of 5-6. The end goal of increasing PCI smoothness has not been achieved.
A sheet of powder coat grade MDF is cut by a CNC router with new condition solid carbide tooling into a rectangle with dimensions of 12″W, 18″L, 0.75″ thickness. Edge profiles are shaped to 1/16″ radius; the faces and edges of the part are sanded using an automated sanding machine using the grit sequences and steps set forth in
However, unlike example 1, this part is left without proceeding to the final buffing step. The resulting part has a PCI smoothness of 9-10; however, the finish is chalky, inconsistent in color, and has obvious surface scratches left by the abrasive equipment. It would not hold up to any end-product use without further surface treatment, and has no discernible finish depth. It would not be considered a salable end product.
While the present invention has been fully described above with particularity and detail in connection with what is presently deemed to be the most practical and preferred embodiment of the invention, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications, including, but not limited to, variations in size, materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly and use may be made, without departing from the principles and concepts of the invention as set forth in the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3090695 | Orth, Jr. | May 1963 | A |
3125461 | Hoffman | Mar 1964 | A |
3480456 | Forkner | Nov 1969 | A |
4541466 | Stegherr | Sep 1985 | A |
H244 | Goodwin | Apr 1987 | H |
5620751 | Brindoepke et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5708039 | Daly et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714206 | Daly et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5743789 | Russell | Apr 1998 | A |
6086461 | Williams et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6146252 | Martensson | Nov 2000 | A |
6268022 | Schlegel et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6859988 | Lovchik et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6887516 | Krysa et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7205027 | Brosemer | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7275979 | Raynauld | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7290759 | Lavrencik | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7649034 | Ladatto et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7971551 | Mauchle et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8088452 | Hwang et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8088855 | Hwang et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8329258 | Seitz | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8372478 | Harris et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8591617 | Landgraf | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8597735 | Inoue et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20030054740 | Mansky | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030148026 | Mushett et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030194554 | Petersen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040235391 | Grivna | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050034785 | Lovchik et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20070099551 | Walsh | May 2007 | A1 |
20070157994 | Scoville et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080233300 | Cinoman et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090047480 | Juers et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090071941 | Knoblauch et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090192247 | Daly et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,600, filed Mar. 12, 2013, inventor Craig A. Martin. |