This application is related to commonly owned, co-pending patent application Ser. No. 11/228,597, entitled “Method and System for Printing Secure Value Documents and Non-Secure Documents Utilizing the Same Printing Device,” filed Sep. 16, 2005, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The illustrative embodiments of the present application relate generally to printing, and more particularly to methods and systems for printing secure value documents such as postage labels and non-secure documents utilizing the same printer such as a personal postage stamp printer.
Secure printing systems are often utilized when printing secure value documents such as postage, tickets and money orders. Since such documents may have substantial cash value, there exists a continuing problem of preventing the copying of such documents to generate fraudulent documents. Several different types of security features are used to secure such documents. In postage printing systems, 2 dimensional barcodes may be used to securely carry information used as proof of postage payment during mail processing. A DATAMATRIX barcode may be used and as such the postage printer will print a 2D DATAMATRIX barcode to create a secure indicium as evidence of postage payment.
Since the security features enable the detection of copies of the secure value documents, it is necessary to ensure that the secure printing systems themselves cannot be used to print fraudulent images which contain the security features. It is therefore necessary to control the source of the images being printed by the secure printing systems, thereby preventing a dishonest person from providing a fraudulent image, e.g., a counterfeit postage indicium, ticket, money order or the like, to the secure printing system, which will print the security features in the fraudulent image, such that it appears legitimate. As a result, such secure printing systems are single purpose devices, i.e., they can only be used to print value documents from a secure source and cannot be used to print any other types of images. This restriction limits the usefulness of such secure printing systems. Personal postage stamp printers have been proposed. With such printers, postal customers, after prepayment of postage, will be allowed to print adhesive postage stamps. The postal customers will be permitted to create or supply a custom image to be incorporated as part of the postage stamps. For example, a postage label printer may be able to print secure postage labels with custom images, but not other non-secure text or graphics since that might allow fraudulent copies of valid postage indicia to be printed.
Personal postage stamp printers may utilize direct contact thermal printhead technology. Thermal printheads are available from several companies including Kyocera Industrial Ceramics Corp. of Vancouver, Wash. and Mitsubishi Electric of Irvine, Calif. Such printheads are available in a variety of sizes and geometric configurations and may be purchased in custom configurations including those having width of approximately one inch. In such printers, the printheads are typically designed to produce heat using thermal printhead heating elements in order to activate thermal media such as a thermal media label stock. Such thermal media is often gray scale media and the elements are heated to higher levels to produce a darker gray output on the thermal media label stock. The thermal printhead typically includes a linear array of resistive heating elements that are brought to increased temperatures using increased drive current. The thermal media passes over the linear array and portions of the media are activated due to the heat present at each heater element.
Thus, there exists a need for a printing system that can be used to print both secure value documents and non-secure documents while ensuring that fraudulent copies of secure value documents printed by the printing system can be prevented.
The illustrative embodiments of the present application describe printing methods and systems that provide both a secure value label printing mode of operation and a non-secure mode of operation that allows generic printing of non-value items without compromising the security feature of the secure printing mode.
According to illustrative embodiments of the invention, the printing system determines if the image to be printed is a secure image or non-secure image. If the image is a secure image such as a personal postage label including a custom image portion and an indicium portion having a barcode, the printing system utilizes the secure mode and enables the use of the full label width of the printhead array. If the printing system determines the image is a non-secure image such as an address label or other non-value graphic, the printing system utilizes the non-secure mode and disables the use certain printhead elements. In such a system, the enforced print disabled regions or “white bands” are enforced in non-secure mode such as by actually disabling the print drive mechanism that allows a row to be printed.
In at least one illustrative configuration, the non-secure mode disables certain portions of the printhead that are required to print a valid secure image such as a properly encoded 2D DATAMATRIX barcode. The disabled portions may correspond to data modules, or the “timing” mark or “L finder” mark in the barcode that is required for barcode readability.
In at least one illustrative configuration, the non-secure mode pads certain regions of the print image buffer with zeros to disable printing in those regions. Each disabled region is a subset of the total image region. There may be one or more disabled regions defined as a set of disabled region configurations sufficient to defeat a required value image format such as a DATAMATRIX barcode. Additionally, in certain aspects the plurality of sets of disabled regions may be presented to the user as alternative non-secure disabled region templates so that the user may select an appropriate non-secure template having a set of disabled regions appropriate for the non-secure print application. In another embodiment, the system controller interrogates a potential non-secure print image to determine if it is compatible with at least one of the set of disabled region templates, and if so it allows the non-secure print using that template. In such cases, the system fills certain sections of the print buffer of the printer controller for those disabled areas with a white value so that they do not print.
In at least one other illustrative configuration, the non-secure mode enforces one or more text only region and one or more graphics regions wherein the graphics regions are too small to accommodate a valid value image. In at least one other illustrative configuration, the co-located processor that creates the non-secure image embeds the disabled regions in the non-secure image before sending it to the printer for a non-secure print.
The accompanying drawings illustrate embodiments of the invention, and together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention. As shown throughout the drawings, like reference numerals designate like or corresponding parts.
The illustrative embodiments of the present application describe printer systems and methods that provide both a secure printing mode and a non-secure printing mode using the same printing device. In the secure mode, a value mark must be printed in the secure image and it must be compatible with the particular secure mark format to be a valid secure value image. For example, 2D barcode symbologies are known and have published formatting rules for valid readable barcodes.
Barcode symbologies used in value printing applications typically have redundancy features to tolerate some errors in printing or other distortion, but will also have areas that are more sensitive to errors. As an illustrative example, the 2D DATAMATRIX barcode often used in secure postage value printing systems has a required format. The barcode may be scaled to a certain extent and still be read and it may have certain cells distorted and be readable. However, certain regions such as the “L finder” and “timing” regions are more susceptible to errors and can be used to render an otherwise valid barcode unreadable.
The illustrative embodiments described herein show a thermal postage printer, but other printing technologies and other value printing applications may be used with the teachings of the application. In a secure mode, the secure image includes at least one value mark. In the non-secure mode described herein, disabled regions are defined and enforced on the image such that the printing of a valid value mark would not be possible in the non-secure mode.
Referring to
Referring to
The printer 1 includes a printer controller 3, such as, for example, a special purpose processor or ASIC, to control operation of the printer 1. The ASIC 3 includes a processing core and logic specific to the secure value printing mode. A memory device 4 is included for storing instruction data and application data and will include a print buffer so that rendered print graphics may then be sent to the print drivers 5, 5′, 5″ for printing using the thermal printhead elements 6, 6′, 6″.
The printer controller handles any thermal printing adjustments required for the print data. The printhead 6. 6′, 6″ is typically a linear array of thermal heating elements. The print drivers 5, 5′, 5″ each drive one or more printhead elements and typically will be configured to drive 64 elements of the 256 element array. The printer controller 3 may be used to provide the logic to switch between the secure printing mode and the non-secure printing mode. For example, when the printer 1 is not connected to a collocated processor, it may be assumed that the system can only be used for the value printing functions. Accordingly, in an illustrative embodiment in stand alone mode, the printer 1 may only be used in secure mode for printing custom postage labels. In a connected configuration, if the collocated processor is running an authenticated postage printing application, the printer controller 3 allows the collocated processor 20 to run in secure mode. However, if the collocated processor is running a non-authenticated application, the printer allows only non-secure mode printing.
In an alternative embodiment, even the non-secure applications must be authenticated and then the printer controller 3 will trust the collocated processor and application to enforce the required restrictions for the enabled non-secure print mode.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The label media comprises a paper substrate or polypropylene thermal media substrate such as the Mitsubishi K61S-ce 32 level direct gray-scale thermal media. The individual labels 510, 530 are approximately 33.6 mm wide and 33 mm high (including the adhesive backing material as the label media portion that is removed and used as a stamp is approximately 30.2 mm high as shown by the height from scallop to scallop). The thermal media is a gray-scale thermal label that is fed across a thermal printhead that includes a linear array of heating elements. The media has a width that is approximately 1.5 inches wide. The media described is for illustrative purposes. In alternatives, the thermal media may be of a different width as appropriate, may be coated, may be a color media and may be in a different format such as a roll media.
Referring to
Alternatively, additional regions may be used to create a set of disabled regions. In yet another alternative, the disabled region may be implemented by forcing a fill of those disabled regions of the print buffer with zero values. As can be appreciated, when using the print buffer forced fill approach, the enforced disabled regions may be sections of the image that are not bands across the entire image such as by regions defined by x-y coordinates of the image.
Two-dimensional bar codes typically utilize a defined encoding format having certain known absolute or relative physical formatting rules and symbologies so that bar code readers can read the bar code so that the embedded information may be decoded. There are many standard Two-dimensional bar codes formats including the DATAMATRIX bar code that have some error checking and redundancy, but may also have regions that are more vulnerable to failure. For example, the DATAMATRIX bar code format includes an “L finder” region and a “timing pattern” region that may be more sensitive to failures than data regions of the bar code. A single damaged or missing thermal element that is located in an area that prints a sensitive region such as the “timing pattern” region may disproportionately negatively affect the accurate readability of the postage value printer meter. Accordingly, the knowledge of the requirements of the valid barcode are used to facilitate the least obstructive enforced disabled regions in a non-secure print mode. As shown here, the disabled region is approximately.
Referring to
As can be appreciated, the enforced white bands will preclude the printing of valid DATAMATRIX 2D barcodes and other stamp images in the non-secure print mode. The number and position of the white bands 630 can be varied to permit multiple acceptable formats in the non-secure print mode. For example, label 610 is printed with a first enforced white space template having three enforced white band regions 630. That allows a four line address label having four lines of text 640. A DATAMATRIX barcode cannot be printed in that mode. Similarly, label 620 is printed using a second template of enforced disabled regions here defined as two white bands 630. In this case, a three line text address label may be utilized with three lines of text 640. As can be appreciated, the DATAMATRIX barcode cannot be printed in that space due to the white bands. Here the white bands are approximately 5 elements wide, but other configurations may be used.
The controlling program may allow a user to select between available templates such as those used in labels 610 and 620 or may instead rely upon the authenticated non-secure application program to create a non-secure image with sufficient disabled regions to defeat the printing of a valid value mark such as the DATAMATRIX barcode. Accordingly, the application may package the enforced disabled region data with the label data. As described above, the white regions or in an illustrative embodiment, the more specific implementation of white bands may be implemented by disabling certain heating elements or by filling those regions of the print image buffer with zero values.
Referring to
Referring to
The labels described above are suitable for use with various direct thermal printers. For example, a thermal printer incorporating the Kyocera KSB320BA printhead available from Kyocera Industrial Ceramics Corp. of Vancouver, Wash. may be utilized. Furthermore, the STAMPEXPRESSIONS printer from Pitney Bowes Inc. of Stamford, Conn. may be utilized.
Referring to
Commonly-owned, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/172,182, filed Jun. 30, 2005 and entitled Control Panel Label For A Postage Printing Device is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety and describes systems and methods for processing customized postage that alternatively may be advantageously utilized with the systems and methods described herein. Additionally, commonly-owned, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/016,493, filed Dec. 17, 2004 and entitled, Thermal Printer Temperature Management, is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety and describes certain thermal printers that alternatively may advantageously be utilized with the systems and methods described herein. Furthermore, commonly-owned, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/018,707, filed Dec. 21, 2004 and entitled, Label Stock For Thermal Printer, is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety and describes certain thermal printer label stock that alternatively may advantageously be utilized with the systems and methods described herein. Commonly-owned, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/415,307, filed May 1, 2006 and entitled Apparatus and Materials for Two-Stage Printing of Value Indicia is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety and describes systems and methods for processing customized postage that alternatively may be advantageously utilized with the systems and methods described herein. Commonly-owned, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/479,739, filed Jun. 30, 2006 and entitled “Signaling labels and fluorescent ink compositions” is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety and describes methods and systems that alternatively may advantageously be utilized with the systems and methods described herein.
In an alternative applicable to any of the embodiments herein, the printing technology utilized may be replaced including replacing the direct thermal technology described with inkjet, bubble jet, LED, laser, ribbon thermal, dye sub or other appropriate printing technology. For example, the embodiments may instead use a modified DM series postage meter available from PITNEY BOWES of Stamford Conn. configured to use ink jet printing and nozzles.
While several illustrative embodiments of the invention have been described and illustrated above, it should be understood that these are exemplary of the invention and are not to be considered as limiting. The embodiments are illustrative and not intended to present an exhaustive list of possible configurations. Where alternative elements are described, they are understood to fully describe alternative embodiments without repeating common elements whether or not expressly stated to so relate. Similarly, alternatives described for elements used in more than one embodiment are understood to describe alternative embodiments for each of the described embodiments having that element. Additions, deletions, substitutions, and other modifications can be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be considered as limited by the foregoing description but is only limited by the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5028991 | Sekizawa et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5075780 | Shibahara | Dec 1991 | A |
5258998 | Koide | Nov 1993 | A |
5386303 | Kihara | Jan 1995 | A |
5793902 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5889537 | Shimada | Mar 1999 | A |
5910987 | Ginter et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920684 | Hastings et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6089695 | Takagi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6102592 | Herbert | Aug 2000 | A |
6145959 | Lund et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6169608 | Yoshida | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6363177 | Loce et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6460958 | Kubo et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6469803 | Kato | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6515767 | Sakurai | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6550994 | Manduley | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6574000 | Sansome | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6680783 | Pierce et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6811335 | Ryan, Jr. et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6832823 | Askeland et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6879333 | Furuyama | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6902331 | Raman | Jun 2005 | B1 |
7029096 | Weijkamp et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033091 | Nakao | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7108344 | Yraceburu et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7124117 | Girardi et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7130951 | Christie et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7207640 | Garcia Reyero et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7233930 | Ryan, Jr. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7292356 | Otokita | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7319989 | Athens et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7353213 | Ryan, Jr. et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7383194 | Heiden et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7483175 | Ryan, Jr. et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7533067 | Beckstrom et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7623263 | Yoshida et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7689518 | Bator et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7733530 | Ryan et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7793087 | Zenz et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7821690 | Yamada et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8269995 | Niitsuma | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8506062 | Xu | Aug 2013 | B2 |
20040024710 | Fernando et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050093901 | Yraceburu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060004964 | Conti et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060212945 | Donlin et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070062402 | Ryan, Jr. et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080005042 | Ryan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090091800 | Ryan, Jr. et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080053329 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |