1. Technical Field
The invention relates to a method for producing a sliding bearing of an aluminium-iron-silicon alloy. The invention further relates to a sliding bearing with a sliding surface of an aluminium-iron-silicon alloy.
2. Related Art State of the Art
When producing sliding bearings, in particular connecting-rod bearings for internal combustion engines, it is necessary to use materials that are characterized by high abrasion resistance. Furthermore, it is expedient that the alloys used as materials for such applications are characterized by very good availability and a low price. Furthermore, it is desirable that the materials of the sliding bearings are of moderate hardness in order to ensure good embeddability of hard particles (contaminants) in the engine.
In the past, sliding bearings were frequently made of alloys, the chemical composition of which became increasingly complicated owing to the addition of more and more alloy elements. With regard to a pair of sliding components used in an engine, DE 10 2005 047 037 A1 shows an aluminium base alloy for sliding elements of an internal combustion engine or of a hydraulic system, which are to be operated under the friction conditions of mixed/boundary friction and/or hydrodynamics, but also those of dry run, which is characterized in that it consists in the material volume and/or on the friction surface of an aluminium base alloy with at least 80 wt. % of aluminium.
US 2003/0185701 A1 describes a process for the production of an aluminium-iron-vanadium-silicon alloy which is supposed to be characterized by high strength and high wear resistance. In this case, the primary intermetallic phases are modified, as are the interdendritic silicide phases, in that the melt is treated with elemental magnesium or alloys containing magnesium. DE 10 2004 025 557 A1 and US 2009-0245702 A1 constitute further state of the art.
An object forming the basis for the invention is to provide a method for the production of a sliding bearing in which an alloy is to be used which, in contrast to hitherto plated, lead-free aluminium materials, has a simpler chemical composition and is simpler to produce, with sliding properties being improved at the same time.
According thereto, a sliding bearing is produced by rolling an aluminium-iron-silicon alloy onto a steel back. Aluminium-iron-silicon alloys are characterized by a low density, which is advantageous for the resulting component since this means that it is low in weight. Furthermore, they are of moderate hardness, which is advantageous for use in a sliding bearing since this means that there is only little abrasion of the material with which the sliding bearing is in contact. Moreover, the materials are inexpensive, and the alloy is easy to produce owing to its composition.
It is preferred that the alloy comprises up to 10% of iron and up to 3% of silicon. The specification % relates to percent by weight here and in the following. By means hereof, the resulting final hardness of the thus resulting alloy can be adjusted.
According to the invention, the iron/silicon ratio is between 2:1 and 4:1. As a result, iron silicides and aluminium-iron compounds may form, dependent on the desired final hardness, which permit selective adjustment of the desired final hardness of the material.
It is also preferred that the aluminium-iron-silicon alloy comprises up to 20%, particularly preferred up to 15%, of tin. Thus, the sliding properties and the mechanical properties can be adjusted with regard to the use as a sliding bearing.
It is also preferred that the aluminium-iron-silicon alloy comprises up to 1%, preferably up to 0.2%, even more preferably 0.02 to 0.05%, of strontium and/or sodium. The precipitation behavior of the iron silicides and aluminium-iron compounds can be improved by this. In particular, the shape and size of the precipitates can thus be adjusted during casting. Moreover, as fine a distribution as possible of the iron silicide particles and the aluminium-iron-compound particles is achieved, which produces uniform mechanical properties of the material. The addition of sodium leads to finer precipitates which, however, occur in larger numbers (see e.g. “Schmelzbehandlung von Aluminium und Aluminiumlegierungen mit MTS” as published by FOSECO). Furthermore, high thermal conductivity is achieved, which is roughly equivalent to that of pure aluminium and which causes better heat dissipation under mixed friction conditions.
It is also preferred that the steel back preferably comprises C10 or C22 steel. This material, onto which the aluminium-iron-silicon alloy is rolled (plated), has the advantage that the material is inexpensive and easy to obtain and that it is characterized by good mechanical properties, in particular high strength.
A further advantageous embodiment is that the method comprises the following steps in the specified order:
An advantage of this method is that the subsequent hardness of the resulting material can be easily controlled by the method steps. Since, as mentioned above, moderate hardness is desired, the material thus produced can be easily adapted to the desired application. Furthermore, all of the steps can be easily performed industrially, which also means that the costs for carrying out the method are relatively low.
It is also preferred that during the casting in step (B) the material is cast into a strand by means of a continuous casting process. The advantage of this is that a strand can be easily processed industrially.
It is also preferred that the heating in step (C) is carried out at a temperature of approx. 450 to 550° C. and takes 10 to 20 hours. The advantage of this is that the hardness of the resulting material is significantly reduced by this, which particularly facilitates the subsequent rolling step (D). Moreover, this results in a homogenization of the material.
It is further preferred that the rolling in step (D) results in a thickness of the material of approx. 0.8 to 1.2 mm. This has the advantage that the thus relatively thin material is well prepared for a use and plating (E) as is performed in the next step.
Furthermore, it is preferred that the heating in step (F) takes 6 to 10 hours and occurs at approx. 180° C. to 240° C. Thus, the hardness is decreased and the desired embeddability is ensured at the same time in that dislocations are reduced. Both effects are advantageous when using the material in a sliding bearing.
It is also preferred that the rolling in step (G) takes place such that there is a deformation by 5 to 15%. What can be achieved by this is that the hardness of the finished material can be adapted to the application.
The sliding bearing according to the invention has a sliding surface with an aluminium-iron-silicon alloy.
According to the invention, the iron/silicon ratio is between 2:1 and 4:1. As a result, iron silicides and aluminium-iron compounds may form, dependent on the desired final hardness, which permit selective adjustment of the desired final hardness of the material.
It is also preferred that the aluminium-iron-silicon alloy comprises up to 15% of tin. Thus, the sliding properties and the mechanical properties can be adjusted with regard to the use as a sliding bearing.
It is also preferred that the aluminium-iron-silicon alloy comprises up to 0.2%, preferably 0.02 to 0.05%, of strontium or sodium. The precipitation behavior and precipitation form of the iron silicides and aluminium-iron compounds can be improved by this. In particular, the shape and size of the precipitates can thus be adjusted. Moreover, as fine a distribution as possible of the iron silicide particles and the aluminium-iron-compound particles is achieved, which ensures uniform mechanical properties of the material. Furthermore, high thermal conductivity is achieved, which is roughly equivalent to that of pure aluminium and which causes better heat dissipation under mixed friction conditions.
Furthermore, it is preferred that the bearing material has a hardness of 40 to 60 HBW 1/5/30. This has the advantage that this hardness is particularly suitable for use in a sliding bearing.
Subsequently, the material was annealed at a temperature of approx. 450 to 550° C. for 16 hours. After one hour, the material had a hardness of 40 HBW 1/5/30, and after two hours it had a hardness of 38 HBW 1/5/30 which it also had after three hours, four hours and five hours. After six hours of annealing the material had a hardness of 35 HBW 1/5/30, after seven hours of annealing it had a hardness of 37 HBW 1/5/30, after eight hours of annealing it had a hardness of 36 HBW 1/5/30, after twelve hours of annealing it had a hardness of 35 HBW 1/5/30, and after sixteen hours of annealing, i.e. after completion of the heating in step (B), it had a hardness of 36 HBW 1/5/30.
Subsequently, the material, which previously had a thickness of 8 mm, was rolled to a thickness of 1.1 mm. During rolling, a hardness of 58 HBW 1/5/30 was achieved with a thickness of 1.5 mm, and after a thickness of 1.1 mm was achieved, the material had a hardness of 62 HBW 1/5/30. For the sake of comparison, the material was further rolled to 0.45 mm, which resulted in a hardness of 63 HBW 1/5/30.
For comparison, a sample of the material was further annealed at 450 to 550° C. A hardness of 36 HBW 1/5/30 was detected even after 20 hours of annealing and 24 hours of annealing.
The material rolled to 1.1 mm was then rolled (plated) onto a steel support. Prior to plating, the initial thickness of the steel was 2.8 mm, and the initial thickness of the aluminium alloy was, as mentioned above, 1.1 mm. After plating, the thickness of the steel was between 1.1 and 1.15 mm, and the thickness of aluminium was between 0.38 and 0.42 mm. Thus, there was a total deformation of 62% while the steel material was deformed by 50% and the aluminium material was deformed by 64%. A hardness of 63 HBW 1/5/30 was achieved by this plating step.
After annealing the material at 180 to 240° C., a hardness of 43 HBW 1/5/30 was measured. The resulting material can be seen as a microsection in
Finally, the material was rolled to a total thickness of 1.33 mm, with the steel being 1 mm thick and the aluminium having a thickness of 0.3 mm. In this case the total material was deformed by 13%, with the steel component also being deformed by 13%. The aluminium was deformed by 22%. In this case the resulting hardness was 49 HBW 1/5/30.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2011 004 133 | Feb 2011 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/068863 | 10/27/2011 | WO | 00 | 8/15/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/110115 | 8/23/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4732820 | Mori | Mar 1988 | A |
4818628 | Alexander et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5041339 | Mori et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5286445 | Kamiya | Feb 1994 | A |
6068931 | Adam et al. | May 2000 | A |
6673168 | Matucha et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6899844 | Desaki et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902324 | Steffens et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
20020034454 | Fujita et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030185701 | Sahoo et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20090245702 | Kagohara et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090246072 | Nirasawa et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1334353 | Feb 2002 | CN |
2924145 | Jul 2007 | CN |
101279345 | Oct 2008 | CN |
19833200 | Jan 2000 | DE |
102004025557 | Jan 2005 | DE |
102005047037 | Apr 2007 | DE |
2105512 | Sep 2009 | EP |
H04202734 | Jul 1992 | JP |
2002038230 | Feb 2002 | JP |
WO-9611800 | Apr 1996 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130318795 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |