The invention relates to a piezoelectric stack actuator and a method for producing the same.
Piezoelectric stack actuators of alternatingly arranged piezoelectric layers and electrodes are known e.g. from U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,384,230, 4,721,447.
US 2010/0140379 A1, US 2006/0066178 A1, JP 2006-179525 A, JP 2006-216850 A, JP 2006-229068 A, US 2010/0139621 A1, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,309,945 disclose, among other things, monolithic blocks of piezoelectric layers and electrodes sintered in one piece.
From WO 2003/105246 A2, the principle of selectively introduced, controlled break-off areas is known to prevent an accumulation of tension in monolithic actuators.
According to an alternative design, which presents the starting point for the invention, the piezoelectric stack actuators are assembled from actuators which, taken alone, already comprise one or several piezoceramic layers and are preferably designed as functional multi-layer actuators, so that the deflections of the individual actuators are overlaid in the stack direction and sum up. In contrast to monolithic blocks of alternatingly arranged piezoelectric layers and electric contacts, these so-called chip stacks are glued since the polarisation of the actuators will get lost at temperatures above 300° C., and sintering is consequently ruled out. Due to gluing, the actuator segments are spaced apart in the stack bond due to the adhesive between individual actuators along the stacking axis. Moreover, bulky actuators cannot be reliably produced monolithically free from defects due to problems with the organic burnout. Adhesion moreover promotes the construction of stacks of flexible lengths with a minimum production time.
WO 2006/100247 A1 discloses a stack-like arrangement of multi-layer actuators, wherein the actuators are connected by an all-over adhesion across a heat-conducting metal layer.
In stack actuators where the adjacent piezoelectric layers are connected all-over, mechanical tensions occur during electric activation since the piezoelectric layers coupled to each other mutually block themselves in their deformation. This problem increases as the stack height increases.
In the production of such stack actuators, which are also referred to as glued chip stacks of single- or multi-layer actuators, an uncontrolled crack formation can occur. This occurs although the individual segments had been previously polarised 100% and checked for functionality and cracks. After these crack-free actuators (chips) have been glued and reactivated, cracks will then occur in the outer passive insulating layer of the actuators (chips).
These cracks affect the resistibility or service life of the actuators, in particular in a damp environment. In the course of quality control, the affected parts are therefore usually rejected and thereby cause outage losses. Furthermore, production planning is disturbed thereby since the cracks leading to an outage only occur at the end of a process that lasted altogether several weeks.
Even in actuators that are free from cracks at the time of the outgoing materials inspection, cracks regularly occur in the passive boundary layer under application conditions, in particular in a dynamic operation. These affect the reliability or service life in the same way and can thus lead to a standstill of sophisticated production plants in an extreme case. A mixed operation of static and dynamic loads has a particularly critical effect on the service life of actuators. By the alternating load, cracks in the passive layer are promoted which then permit electromigration as damaging mechanism due to penetrating moisture during the static operation, without any self-heating of the actuator.
A further critical operation mode is the activation at low frequencies (some Hz), where no self-heating of the actuator via ambient temperature takes place and thus moisture can be present in the direct proximity of the actuator, and the alternating load moreover promotes the formation of cracks.
Experience shows that the frequency of such cracks increases as the actuator cross-section increases.
Even in high-voltage actuators, where single-layer actuators and contact plates are alternatingly arranged in stacks and glued to each other, short circuits occur due to cracks in the edge region of the actuator segments or at the transition between the active and the passive regions. In contrast to multi-layer actuators, the single-layer actuators require higher voltages to electrically activate the piezoceramic material to generate a deformation.
The object underlying the present invention is to prevent the above-described crack formation to thus increase the service life of a piezoelectric stack actuator made up of individual actuators, in particular during use in a damp environment.
This object is achieved by the method for producing a piezoelectric stack actuator according to claim 1, comprising the following steps:
According to the invention, the piezoelectric stack actuator is produced by coupling individual actuators. From these already functional actuators, a piezoelectric stack actuator can be made up with not much efforts, the stack actuator achieving a clearly larger deflection along the stacking axis than each individual actuator. Furthermore, the stack actuators can be produced essentially more easily from the functional individual actuators than a stack actuator which is designed as a monolithic block and has a considerable axial extension.
In each actor, tensile stresses occur in the so-called passive region without electrodes during expansion since this region does not also expand in contrast to the so-called active region. Due to the low height of the actuators and a deformation of the passive regions, the tensile stress is below a critical load in each individual actuator. In an all-over coupling of the adjacent actuators, however, deformations of the passive regions are no longer possible since these occur in various directions with respect to the coupling plane and accordingly block each other. The effect will continuously increase the more actuators are glued one upon the other. The tensions occurring by the deformation thus sum up and exceed the strength of the passive regions. At weak points, a crack formation thereby occurs.
The solution of the object mentioned at the beginning analogously is to selectively decouple the adjacent actuators, preferably in the edge region. According to the invention, the individual actuators are coupled to each other over a coupling area that is smaller than a projection area of the actuator onto a plane perpendicular to the stacking axis. The coupling area preferably corresponds, in its flat expansion, to that of the active region of the actuator, i.e. the flat expansion of the stack actuator in a plane perpendicular to the stacking axis, minus the area of the passive region. The passive region is usually located at the edge of the actuator. The actuators themselves employed here consist of single- or multi-layer packs with alternatingly arranged piezoceramic layers and electrodes/contacts extending in parallel with respect to each other in planes perpendicular to the stacking axis to generate a deflection along the stacking axis as a result. The region of the piezoceramic layers covered by the electrodes/contacts and electrically activated defines the so-called active region of the actuator which actively deforms when electrically activated. Non-activated regions of the piezoceramic layers (without electrodes) which do not actively but optionally passively deform when the actuators are electrically activated are referred to as insulation, insulating layer or passive region.
By the selective coupling or decoupling of the actuators over the coupling area, the peak loads in the passive regions of the actuators coupled to each other are reduced so that the crack formation mentioned in the beginning can be effectively prevented and the service life of the stack actuators produced according to the method according to the invention is clearly increased.
Advantageous developments are the subject matter of the subclaims.
It can be advantageous if Step A comprises at least one of the following Sub-steps:
However, it can also be of assistance if Step B comprises at least one of the following sub-steps:
The object mentioned in the beginning is also achieved by a piezoelectric stack actuator, preferably produced according to the method according to one of the method claims, comprising at least two actuators which are designed to generate a deflection along an axis when electrically activated, wherein the at least two actuators are stacked along a stacking axis such that the deflections of the actuators generated when the actuators are electrically activated are overlaid along the stacking axis, wherein the at least two actuators are coupled such that a coupling area over which a force-coupling of an actuator to an adjacent actuator is effected is smaller than a projection area of the actuator onto a plane perpendicular to the axis.
It can moreover be of assistance if each one of the actuators comprises at least one of the following features:
However, it can also prove to be useful if the coupling area comprises at least one of the following features:
It may also be practical if the stack actuator has at least one of the following features:
Advantageous developments result from combinations of the features disclosed in the claims, the description, and the drawings.
The terms “insulating layer” and “insulation” describe the passive region of the actuator. This is the edge region of the piezoceramic layers or piezoceramic material which is not electrically excited by the electrodes and therefore does not deform. In addition to this “insulating layer” and “insulation” of piezoceramic material, the actuator may comprise an envelope of an insulating material.
In the drawings:
The preferred embodiments of the invention will be described below in detail with reference to the enclosed drawings.
Each actuator 2 of the stack actuator 1 is made up as a single- or multi-layer actuator of piezoceramic 2a and electric contacts or electrode layers (inner electrodes) 2c, 2e. The piezoceramic layers 2a are stacked along the axis A such that two adjacent piezoceramic layers 2a face each other with the insertion of one electric contact (inner electrode) each in the form of an electrode layer or disk 2c, 2e with poles 2b, 2d of the same polarities.
The electric contacts (inner electrodes) 2c, 2e are in turn connected to (outer) electrodes (or side electrodes, respectively) 25, 26 of a corresponding polarity which are arranged spaced apart at the periphery at the actuator 2 on diametrically opposed sides of the actuator 2. The arrangement of the (outer) electrodes (or side electrodes, respectively) 25, 26 in direct proximity with respect to each other, however, may also be advantageous. In the present example, an electrode layer 2c is connected as an inner electrode to the positive pole 2b of the piezoceramic layer 2a and connected to the positive outer electrode 25 (in
The piezoceramic layers 2a and the electric contacts or electrode layers (inner electrodes) 2c, 2e have different sizes and are stacked one upon the other such that the piezoceramic layers 2a extend radially to the axis A beyond the electric contacts or electrode layers (inner electrodes) 2c, 2e. Thereby, the electric contacts or electrode layers (inner electrodes) 2c, 2e are surrounded at their edges by piezoceramic material to create an air- and moisture-tight “insulation” permitting the use of the actuator 2 in a damp environment. The sections of the piezoceramic layers 2a covered and activatable by the electric contacts or electrode layers (inner electrodes) 2c, 2e, or the sections which, with a projection onto a plane oriented perpendicularly to the axis A, are located radially within the electric contacts or electrode layer (inner electrodes) 2c, 2e, form the active region of the actuator (in
The actuator 2 represented in
In a preferred embodiment, a monolithically sintered ceramic insulating layer 20 surrounds the actuator 2 at its periphery with the exception of the negative electrode 25 and the positive electrode 26.
In the present example, a circular coupling area K is formed at the upper side 21 of each actuator 2 of a piezoceramic material. The coupling area K extends in a plane E perpendicular to the axis A concentrically to the axis A of the actuator 2 and is arranged axially offset to the top by a step with respect to an adjacent and surrounding edge region of the actuator 2 to form the upper axial end of the actuator 2.
As an alternative or in addition to the upper-side coupling area K, at the bottom side of the actuator 2, a corresponding coupling area K can be formed (cf.
The coupling area K is, according to the invention, smaller than a projection area P of the actuator 2 onto a plane E perpendicular to the axis A. The meaning of this feature will be illustrated with reference to
Each actuator 2 generates a deflection along its axis A when electrically activated. This direction of deflection corresponds to the axis A along which the piezoceramic layers 2a are stacked one upon the other. When electrically activated, the active region of the actuator 2 (represented in a shaded manner in
In the present example, with a projection onto a plane E perpendicular to the stacking axis S, the coupling area K is located completely within the projection area P of the actuator 2 and is surrounded by the projection area P across its complete periphery (cf.
For illustrating the principle of the invention with reference to the figures, among other things, stack actuators 1 which are made up from such actuators 2 will be described below. The number of actuators 2 coupled into a stack actuator 1 is not restricted.
The piezoelectric stack actuator 1 illustrated in
In the stack actuator 1 represented in
The identically designed actuators 2 (cf.
In the example according to
The (outer/side) electrodes 25, 26 of the actuators 2 with the same polarities are connected to each other by a connecting section 11, the connecting section 11 being fixed to the corresponding electrode of each actuator 2 at an individual fixing point 12.
In the coupling plane which includes the coupling area K, the edge regions of the actuators 2 are decoupled from each other outside the coupling area K and freely movable with respect to each other. Consequently, peak loads caused by passive deformations of the piezoceramic layers 2a can be reduced without mutually blocking the coupling of the actuators 2 in the edge regions. Thereby, a crack formation is prevented and the service life of the stack actuator 1 is considerably increased.
In the present example, each coupling area K is designed as a plane extending perpendicularly to the axis A or S, respectively. The area dimension of the coupling area K is approximately 0.9-times or 90% of the projection area P of the actuator 2 onto the plane perpendicular to the axis A.
In other words, the advantage of the invention, according to which the coupling area K is reduced compared to the flat extension of the actuator 2 in a plane perpendicular to the axis A, is analogously that the adjacent actuators 2 in the edge regions formed by passive insulation edges are selectively decoupled from each other. In each actuator 2, tensile stresses occur in the so-called passive region in case of expansions since it does not contain any electrodes 2b and therefore does not actively deform. Due to the low height of the actuators 2 and a passive deformation of the edge regions, the tensile stress is below a critical load in each individual actuator 2. When the actuators 2 are glued all-over across their complete cross-sectional areas (extension in a plane perpendicular to the axis A), the coupling of the actuators would block and prevent this deformation. The effect will be increased the more actuators 2 are glued one upon the other. The stresses caused by the deformation would sum up without any countermeasures being taken and exceed the final strength of the passive boundary layer. At the weakest points, a crack formation would result without the features according to the invention.
A stress relief by the adhesive layers is usually not sufficient since for achieving high actuator stiffness, stiff adhesives and very thin glue gaps are employed. It is nevertheless within the scope of the invention that even soft and damping adhesives may be used.
Gluing is therefore preferably only performed at the coupling areas K, and not in the edge regions of the actuators 2 which surround the coupling areas K in the coupling planes. The coupling areas K are smaller than the flat extension of the actuators 2 to be coupled in a plane E perpendicular to the stacking axis S, or smaller than the projection areas P of the actuators 2 to be coupled onto a plane E perpendicular to the axis A or S, respectively (cf.
To realize the subject matter of the invention, different variants of the embodiment are conceivable.
It is on the one hand possible to leave the adhesive away in the edge region. Technically, this is complicated since the adhesive will flow during curing under pressure and often also at an increased temperature. A defined and reproducible gluing on an unlimited area within a plane is thus hardly possible. Therefore, the coupling area K is preferably arranged offset to the adjacent areas or limited.
Preferably, a release agent is therefore applied in the region of the insulation edge which delimits the coupling area K by preventing either the contact with the adhesive or at least its adhesion to at least one connecting partner.
As an alternative, a thin additional element 3 with a smaller cross-section can be introduced between two actuators 2 each, wherein the additional element 3 forms the coupling areas K to the adjacent actuators 2 (
Working out a small step at the axial front sides of the individual actuators 2 is also possible (
Instead of the step, a chamfer or any other recess can be also used (
With high-voltage actuators, a thin plate with a reduced cross-section is glued between the actuator segments by default (
A solution approach for this type of actuator is the application of a protective layer which does not completely fill the gaps. This is possible on the one hand by applying a very thin layer (e. g. evaporation, spraying, . . . ). Furthermore, the application of a film instead of a liquid is possible.
A further alternative is to fill the gaps with a resilient material. Subsequently, the stack can be enveloped as usual.
For both types of actuators 2, the mentioned solution approaches are applicable for arbitrary cross-sections with respect to the shape (round, oval, rectangular, . . . ) and size.
Here, not only full cross-sections are conceivable, but also hollow cross-sections, for example in the form of hollow cylinders.
Tests with various actuators 2 showed that the service life with a static tension of individual chip actuators is usually essentially higher than that of glued chip stacks, in some cases even by at least the factor 2.
By the decoupling of the critical regions of the chips according to the invention, the advantage with respect to the service life in a glued stack is maintained.
With actuators 2 that have a circular cross-section in a plane perpendicular to the stacking axis S, the ratio of the diameter D to the height H can be specified. In an advantageous development of the above-described embodiments, the ratio is D/H≥1, preferably D/H>5, and particularly preferred D/H=6.4. It can furthermore make sense for D/H to be <50.
With actuators 2 that have a rectangular cross-section in a plane perpendicular to the stacking axis S, the ratio of the edge length L to the height H can be specified. In an advantageous development relating to actuators 2 with a rectangular cross-section, the ratio is L/H≥1, preferably L/H>5, and particularly preferred L/H=6.4. It can furthermore make sense for L/H<50.
With such D/H and L/H ratios it is possible to provide actuators with a high stiffness and simultaneously a high deflection which also have a minimum tendency to crack and consequently a high reliability.
With actuators 2 with a circular cross-section, there is in general an advantage compared to actuators 2 with a rectangular cross-section in that a more uniform deformation in the transition region between the active and the passive regions takes place since the passive region has a constant radial distance from the stacking axis S, which is not the case in square or rectangular actuator cross-sections.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102019201650.2 | Feb 2019 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2020/053299 | 2/10/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/161353 | 8/13/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4011474 | O'Neill | Mar 1977 | A |
4384230 | Wisner | May 1983 | A |
4721447 | Erckmann | Jan 1988 | A |
4752712 | Tomita | Jun 1988 | A |
7309945 | Iwase | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7420319 | Kastl et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
20060066178 | Lindner | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060181178 | Kastl et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060214541 | Tsuzuki et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20090152991 | Goat et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100139621 | Murai | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100140379 | Suzuki | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20130342080 | Suma | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102004012282 | Oct 2004 | DE |
102004012284 | Dec 2004 | DE |
10335023 | Feb 2005 | DE |
102008041061 | Feb 2009 | DE |
102007046314 | Apr 2009 | DE |
102007046315 | Apr 2009 | DE |
1107325 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1793430 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1835553 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2079117 | Jul 2009 | EP |
H0242456 | Mar 1990 | JP |
2006179525 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006216850 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006229068 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2003105246 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2006000479 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006100247 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO-2007009908 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2008105381 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2012137542 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2015174651 | Nov 2015 | WO |
WO-2016032029 | Mar 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report (PCT/ISA/210) with translation and Written Opinion (PCT/ISA/237) mailed on Apr. 24, 2020, by the European Patent Office as the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/EP2020/053299. |
Search Report mailed on Aug. 21, 2019, by the German Patent Office for Application No. 102019201650.2. |
Office Action (Notice of Grounds of Rejection) issued Dec. 13, 2022, by the Japan Patent Office in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-569593 and an English translation of the Office Action. (12 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220059751 A1 | Feb 2022 | US |