The present invention relates to a method for producing blast furnace coke in a non-recovery or heat recovery type coke oven.
Coke is a necessary ingredient in the production of steel. Specifically, coke acts as the fuel source in the blast furnaces used to produce steel.
Coke is manufactured by heating coal to a very high temperature. Conventionally, the heating occurs either in a by-product type oven, a non-recovery type oven, or a heat recovery type oven.
The by-product type oven and the non-recovery and heat recovery type ovens are distinguishable from each other operationally and structurally. In the by-product type oven, the by-products of the coking process are used in other processes in an attempt to maximize the efficiency of the coking process. In the non-recovery and heat recovery type ovens, as the name suggests, no attempt is made to recover the chemical by-products of the coking process. In the heat recovery type oven, the waste gases generated during the non-recovery carbonization process are used to generate steam, which in turn is used generally to generate electricity. In the by-product type oven, the coal is loaded from the top, and the product is removed by pushing the coke out of one of the sides. In the non-recovery and heat recovery type ovens, generally the oven is charged either through single or multiple openings and discharged through a single opening. Unless otherwise indicated, the term “non-recovery type oven” as used herein includes heat recovery type ovens.
All of these ovens usually have a non-uniform coal bulk density after initially charging the oven. Also, the removal of the coke from all of these ovens usually involves an elevation change, which can result in breakage. As a consequence, more of the coke oxidizes, decreasing yield and increasing emissions. This breakage results in a relatively unknown amount of coke surface area being exposed during the quenching process which follows the coking process. It is thus difficult to estimate the required amount and location of quenching material to be applied and the appropriate location to which the quenching material should be applied. Consequently, the moisture content of the coal is quite variable. Uniquely the coal and coke bed in non-recovery and heat-recovery ovens are exposed to oxidizing atmosphere which can decrease the coke yield; however, the drop in yield may be partially offset by carbon deposition.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a method for producing coke includes the steps of providing a container, disposing a volume of loose coal into the container such that a vertical dimension of the volume of loose coal in the container is smaller than the horizontal dimensions of the volume of loose coal, and applying a force to the volume of loose coal in the container to produce a volume of compacted coal having a substantially uniform density which is larger than that of the loose coal disposed in the container. The method also includes the steps of disposing the volume of compacted coal into a non-recovery type oven, and heating the volume of compacted coal to produce coke.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a method of producing coke includes the steps of disposing a volume of coal into a non-recovery type oven having an oven floor, heating the volume of coal to produce a substantially uniform coke mass, providing a container, and moving the coke mass from the oven at a substantially constant elevation to the container. The method also includes the steps of quenching the coke mass in the container to produce a quenched coke mass, and removing the quenched coke mass from the container.
According to a further aspect of the present invention, a method of producing coke includes the steps of providing a first container, disposing a volume of loose coal into the first container such that a vertical dimension of the volume of loose coal in the first container is smaller than the horizontal dimensions of the volume of loose coal, applying a force to the volume of loose coal in the first container to produce a volume of compacted coal having a substantially uniform density which is greater than that of the loose coal disposed in the first container, and disposing the volume of compacted coal into a non-recovery type oven having an oven floor. The method also includes the step of heating the volume of compacted coal to produce a substantially uniform coke mass. In addition, the method includes the steps of providing a second container, moving the coke mass from the oven at a substantially constant elevation to the second container, quenching the coke mass in the second container to produce a substantially uniformly quenched coke mass, and removing the quenched coke mass from the second container.
These and other features of the present invention will become more apparent and the invention will be better understood upon consideration of the following description and the accompanying drawings:
The embodiments of the invention described herein are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Rather, the embodiments selected for description have been chosen to enable one skilled in the art to practice the invention.
A method of producing coke in a non-recovery type oven according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown in
While the method includes all three stages, 22, 24, 26, it will be recognized that the pre-carbonization stage 22 could be used advantageously independently from the post-carbonization stage 26, and vice versa. That is, advantages may be achieved by using only the pre-carbonization stage 22 or the post-carbonization stage 26 of the method to produce coke. To simplify the overview of the invention, however, the stages 22, 26 have been illustrated as parts of a single method.
The method starts at a step 28. At a step 30, a first container in the shape of a rectangular horizontal box is provided, and at a step 32, a volume of loose coal is disposed in the first container. The volume of loose coal has a vertical dimension which is considerably smaller than its horizontal dimensions. A force is applied to the volume of loose coal in the first container at a step 34. The force applied to the volume of loose coal compacts the coal together, producing a volume of compacted coal having a substantially uniform density greater than that of the volume of loose coal initially disposed in the first container. At a step 36, the volume of compacted coal is moved from the first container into a non-recovery type oven, where it is heated at a step 38 to produce a substantially uniform coke mass.
A second container in the shape of a rectangular horizontal box is provided at a step 40, preferably with a bottom wall of the second container on a similar elevation with a floor of the non-recovery oven. The coke is then moved from the non-recovery oven to the second container at a substantially constant elevation at a step 42. At a step 44, the second container and coke contained therein are moved to a quenching station, where the coke is quenched, for example, with water, to cool the coke. The quenched coke is then removed from the container at a step 46, and the method ends at a step 48.
The method described above has several advantages over conventional methods of producing coke using non-recovery type ovens.
In particular, relative to the pre-carbonization stage 22, the compaction of the coal will result in an increase in coal bulk density through a reduction in the interparticle void spaces. Through the reduction in the interparticle void spaces, better wetting, bonding, and interaction will occur between the coal particles upon heating. By increasing the particle interaction, the coke quality and yield will be increased and energy efficiency during carbonization will be improved. Additionally, the coke should be less susceptible to breakage and the moisture within the coke should be better controlled. Also, the coal ash fusion reactions with the refractory inside of the oven chamber and the initial charging emissions should be decreased.
Further, relative to the post-heating stage 26, by avoiding elevation changes which might break up the coke, less surface area is exposed. Less exposed surface area leads to smaller yield losses because of oxidization of the coke, and to smaller amounts of particulate emissions. Moreover, because the coke mass is substantially uniform, the calculation of the amount of quenching material (e.g., water) required can be refined over conventional methods, allowing for lower average coke moisture and lower average moisture variation.
The pre-carbonization and post-carbonization stages 22, 26 of the method are now discussed in greater detail with reference to
The pre-carbonization stage 22 is shown in
Starting initially at a step 50, a container 52 is provided at a step 54, as shown in
As illustrated in
At a step 74, a force is applied to the volume of loose coal 70, as shown in
As a result of the force applied in step 74, the bulk density of the coal 70 is substantially uniformly increased. Assuming constant horizontal dimensions, w and l, for the volume of coal 70, the increase in bulk density translates into a decrease (of about 3 or 4 inches) in the vertical dimension, h, of the coal 70, as shown in
At this point, the compacted coal 70 is ready to be moved from the container 52 at a step 80. As shown in
Before carbonization, the bottom wall 56 of the container 52 is withdrawn from the interior of the oven 84 at a step 92. To achieve this, as shown in
As discussed above, the substantially uniform compaction of the coal 70 will result in greater interaction between coal particles, improving yield and quality (strength and physical characteristics) and limiting coke breakage, coke loss, and coke emissions. Compaction would also reduce coal particle emission during charging. Also, by achieving a substantially uniform compaction, the coke rate throughout the volume of compacted coal should be fairly uniform, and the coking process may be further optimized given the uniformity of the coal mass. Also, uniformity in heating will result in better utilization of energy. Additionally, because the coal 70 is better able to maintain its shape upon insertion into the oven 84, there will be a reduction in coal ash fusion reactions with the oven wall refractory bricks.
The post-carbonization stage 26 is shown in
The post-carbonization stage 26 starts with a step 100. A container 102 is provided at a step 104 adjacent to an opening 106 in a non-recovery type oven 108, as shown in
Having provided the container 102, the wall 112 is separated from the container 102, and at a step 124, the coke 122 is moved from the oven 108 into the space 120 at a constant elevation, as indicated by an arrow 126. To further elaborate, the oven 108 has a floor 128 which is a vertical distance H1 above a reference point. The bottom wall 110 of the container 102 is a vertical distance H2 above the same reference point. Preferably, the vertical distances H1 and H2 are substantially equal, i.e. the floor 128 and the bottom wall 110 are at the same elevation. Some slight deviation (one to five inches lower, for example) is acceptable between the distances H1 and H2, but the greater the differential, the higher the risk of breakage, which is to be avoided. A top wall may be added to the container 102 so that the coke mass is fully enclosed once it is removed from the oven 108.
With the coke 122 in the container 102, the container 102 is moved to a quenching station 130 (
At a step 132, the coke 122 is quenched. The coke 122 may be quenched using a variety of processes, one of which is shown in
After quenching, the quenched coke 122 may be removed from the container 102 by disposing the container 102 at an angle, θ, to the horizontal at a step 138 as shown in
The advantages of the post-carbonization stage 26 described above are numerous. By reducing coke breakage caused by falling, contact with hard surfaces, contact with other cokes, etc., the coke yield will increase. Furthermore, less coke breakage also results in less surface area for coke exposed to air and air currents, again resulting in increased yield by limiting coke oxidation. Less breakage and fewer exposed surfaces result in a reduction of fine particle generation, thus significantly limiting or eliminating particle emissions. Consistent size of coke mass provides for lower average coke moisture and average variation in moisture because the uniformity in coke mass allows for the quenching process to be optimized. Moreover, by combining the pre- and post-carbonization stages, the quenching process may be even more effectively optimized because of the increased uniformity of the charge, which in turn produces an even more consistent coke mass geometry. By enclosing the coke, the energy recovery will be improved, and the emissions will be decreased.
Although the present invention has been shown and described in detail, the same is to be taken by way of example only and not by way of limitation. Numerous changes can be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the scope of the invention. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3619148 | Wilde | Nov 1971 | A |
3652403 | Knappstein et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3772155 | Knappstein et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3907648 | Nire et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3959083 | Goedde et al. | May 1976 | A |
4123216 | Leibrock | Oct 1978 | A |
4128402 | Leibrock et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4141793 | Aoki et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4142941 | Weber et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4186054 | Brayton et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4248671 | Belding | Feb 1981 | A |
4257848 | Brayton et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4274923 | Mahar | Jun 1981 | A |
4285772 | Kress | Aug 1981 | A |
4419186 | Wienert | Dec 1983 | A |
4606876 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4726465 | Kwasnik et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
5151159 | Wolfe et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5190617 | Kress et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5345994 | Kato et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5423951 | Wienert | Jun 1995 | A |
5725993 | Bringley et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6059932 | Sturgulewski | May 2000 | A |
6290494 | Barkdoll | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6332957 | Gross et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
20040079628 | Eatough et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 596 870 | May 1994 | EP |
7109467 | Apr 1995 | JP |
WO 9012074 | Oct 1990 | WO |
WO 9102781 | Mar 1991 | WO |
WO 8808442 | Nov 1998 | WO |