This invention relates to a method for producing carbon nanostructures such as carbon nanotubes and carbon nano-onions using a thermal plasma torch which involves in situ catalyst generation of nanometer sized metal catalyst particles. The method and apparatus provides a technique for the synthesis of carbon nanotubes (CNT) and carbon nano-onions with scale up possibilities to industrial (megawatt) levels.
State of the art techniques that are used presently for commercial production of carbon nanotubes show limitations in scale up possibility for large yields of fullerenes and CNT production, while the demand for CNT in emerging applications, for example in the field of materials is rapidly moving to the tons/month requirements.
Techniques such as the graphite arc methods that presently supply the carbon nanotube market (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,227,038; 5,482,601; 6,451,175 B1; 6,455,021; 6,063,243; and 5,753,088) are showing decreasing yields to nil as the arc power is increased, and poor energy efficiency. Other techniques such as laser ablation or chemical vapor deposition (CVD) techniques relate to methods that are not available at industrial scale power (Megawatt level) for providing yields above the grams/hour level.
An essential component of CNT growth is the provision of a method that provides for the nanometer sized metal catalyst particles acting as nucleation points for the tube growth. CNTs are typically formed when such nanometer size particles are present in systems generating fullerenes (C60, C70, and larger carbon cage structures). The catalyst prevents the closure of the carbon cage and enhances the growth of the long tubular structures. The graphite arc method typically introduces metal catalyst material within the solid graphite source with both carbon and catalyst metal being evaporated simultaneously. This results in difficult control of the carbon to metal vapor ratio, and no possibility of real time adjustments. Other methods use a long chemical route for assuring the presence of the nano-particles on surfaces on which the tubes are growing.
This disclosure relates to a process for the manufacture of carbon nanostructures, from carbon nanotubes and carbon non-onions, comprising the steps of a) providing a high enthalpy metal electrode generated direct current thermal plasma torch having a plasma forming gas feed and a cooled nozzle attached thereto, the torch being connected to a cooled reactor having a quenching zone downstream of the plasma torch for the formation of carbon nanostructures; b) selecting a catalyst metal and providing the catalyst metal to the plasma stream, selecting a torch power at a level of from about 30 kW up to a multi-megawatt level, selecting a flow rate for the plasma forming gas feed, and selecting the reactor pressure so as to provide a plasma torch stream temperature required to vaporize and maintain the selected catalyst metal in the vapor state; c) providing a feed of a carbon containing substance and a carrier gas at a selected flow rate to the plasma stream; and d) the resulting plasma stream containing carbon, carrier gas and metal vapor entering, the quenching zone of carbon nanostructure formation, wherein the plasma stream is rapidly cooled at a quenching rate which can be calculated in accordance with the formula ΔT/t, where ΔT is the temperature difference between the temperature of the plasma entering the nozzle T2 and the temperature of the plasma in the quenching zone T1, with the average temperature entering the nozzle T2 being calculated by the formula T2=T1+Wp/{dot over (m)}Cp, where T1 is room temperature; Wp is the energy input to the plasma, {dot over (m)} is the mass flow rate of the carrier gas; Cp is the specific heat of the carrier gas; and t is the time for the plasma stream to travel from the plasma torch to the quenching zone, where t can be calculated by the formula t=length of nozzle/velocity of plasma gas entering the nozzle, whereupon metal catalyst nanoparticles acting as nucleation sites and catalyst for the growth of carbon nanostructures are generated in situ, which with atomic carbon from the carbon containing substance, form such structures in a diameter range of from about 2 to about 30 nm, which carbon nanostructures are then collected. In a further aspect, the process involves the manufacture of carbon nanostructures, the carbon nanostructures being selected from carbon nanotubes and carbon nano-onions, comprising the steps of a) providing a high enthalpy metal electrode generated direct current thermal plasma torch having a plasma forming gas feed and a cooled nozzle attached thereto, the cooled nozzle having a carbon containing substance and carrier gas feed, the torch being connected to a cooled reactor having a quenching zone downstream of the plasma torch for the formation of carbon nanostructures; b) selecting a catalyst metal, selecting the torch power at a level of from about 30 kW up to a multi-megawatt level, selecting the flow rates of the plasma forming gas feed and the carbon containing substance and carrier gas feed, and selecting the reactor pressure so as to provide a plasma torch temperature required to vaporize the catalyst metal and maintain the catalyst metal in vapor form, a plasma stream expansion at the nozzle exit and the downstream quenching zone allowing cooling of the plasma stream wherein the plasma stream is rapidly cooled at a quenching rate which can be calculated in accordance with the formula ΔT/t, where ΔT is the temperature difference between the temperature of the plasma entering the nozzle T2 and the temperature of the plasma in the quenching zone T1, with the average temperature entering the nozzle T2 being calculated by the formula T2=T1+Wp/{dot over (m)}Cp, where T1 is room temperature; Wp is the energy input to the plasma, {dot over (m)} is the mass flow rate of the carrier gas; Cp is the specific heat of the carrier gas; and t is the time for the plasma stream to travel from the plasma torch to the quenching zone, where t can be calculated by the formula t=length of nozzle/velocity of plasma gas entering the nozzle, to generate in situ nanometer sized metal catalyst particles, which act as catalyst and nucleation sites for the formation of carbon nanostructures; and c) injecting the carbon-containing substance and carrier gas into the nozzle at a feed rate that allows the formation of atomic carbon, and injecting the resulting plasma stream seeded with atomic carbon and metal vapours into the quenching zone downstream of the plasma torch which, in the presence of the nanometer sized metal catalyst particles generated in situ, form carbon nanostructures having a diameter of from about 2 to about 30 nm, which are then collected. In another aspect, the process for the manufacture of carbon nanostructures, the carbon nanostructures being selected from carbon nanotubes and carbon nano-onions, comprising the steps of a) selecting tungsten as a catalyst metal and providing a high enthalpy tungsten-coated electrode in a direct current thermal plasma torch having an inlet for a plasma forming gas feed at a flow rate of about 100 to about 225 standard liters per minute; b) selecting the torch power at a level of from about 30 to about 65 kW and the reactor pressure at about 200 to about 800 torr, so as to provide a plasma torch temperature required to vaporize the tungsten-coated metal electrode and maintain the tungsten metal in the form of a vapor; c) selecting a tungsten nozzle attached to the torch outlet and cooled to a temperature below 1500° C., the nozzle having a carbon containing substance and a carrier gas feed inlet and injecting the carbon-containing substance at a rate of about 0.15 mol/min with a carrier gas at a flow rate of about 20 standard liters per minute into the plasma stream from the nozzle inlet; and d) using the cooling of the plasma stream produced by the carbon-containing substance and carrier gas feed, and by a supersonic shock created at an exit of the nozzle or the provision of an expansion in the nozzle internal diameter, wherein the plasma stream is rapidly cooled at a quenching rate which can be calculated in accordance with the formula ΔT/t, where ΔT is the temperature difference between the temperature of the plasma entering the nozzle T2 and the temperature of the plasma in the quenching zone T1, with the average temperature entering the nozzle T2 being calculated by the formula, T2=T1+Wp/{dot over (m)}Cp, where T1 is room temperature; Wp is the energy input to the plasma, {dot over (m)} is the mass flow rate of the carrier gas; Cp is the specific heat of the carrier gas; and t is the time for the plasma stream to travel from the plasma torch to the quenching zone, where t can be calculated by the formula t=length of nozzle/velocity of plasma gas entering the nozzle, to generate in situ nanometer sized tungsten catalyst particles, which act as the catalyst and nucleation sites for the formation of carbon nanostructures having a diameter of from about 2 to about 30 nm within the plasma stream, which are then collected.
In determining a suitable apparatus for carrying out the process of the invention, it is thought that the geometric configuration of the nozzle can be optimized by computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modeling of the temperature/flow patterns in the nozzle. Commercially, it is desirable to maximize nucleation beyond the nozzle. The present invention relates to the process described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,395,496 (Process for the synthesis of fullerenes; P. G. Tsantrizos, S. Grenier) but is directed towards CNT synthesis. The present invention can also be used for the synthesis of carbon nano-onions. The process of the invention makes use of U.S. Pat. No. 5,147,998 (High enthalpy plasma torch; P. G. Tsantrizos et al) for the plasma and catalyst nano-particles generation device.
A feature of the present process is in the generation of the nanometer sized particles of catalyst. The present process uses the intrinsic vaporization of a properly chosen electrode material within the plasma torch to generate metal vapor that nucleates into nano-particles in a zone of nanotube formation. Hence the amount of catalyst nano-particles and of carbon precursor for CNT growth are controlled independently and without the requirement for an external feed system for the metal catalyst. The metal vapor content in the plasma is controlled by the electric arc current in the plasma torch, and the quantity of carbon in the system is controlled by the carbon source gas volumetric flow.
The method of this invention is based on DC plasma torch technology currently available and used for chemical synthesis and materials treatment at the multi-Megawatt power level. A carbon-containing gas is used as the source material for CNT generation. This gas is dissociated in the plasma environment to provide the atomic carbon for CNT growth. This is much more economical from the energy perspective than the solid carbon sublimation used in graphite arc and laser methods, and also adds to the scale up potential through the volumetric increase of gas treated at large power. An increase in process power translates into an increased amount of the carbon feed gas that is treated and transformed into CNT per unit time.
Other alternate methods for producing the catalyst can be used in this process, for example the injection of metal powders in the outlet flame of the torch or melted droplets of metal from metal samples brought in contact with the flame. This last method has shown carbon fibers growing on the droplets collected on a wall facing the plasma torch. Alternatively, the catalyst nanoparticles can be transported into the liquid carbon precursor, such as tetrachloroethylene (TCE), before injection either in a high power DC plasma torch, or in the injection probe of an inductively coupled thermal plasma torch (TP-ICP) system.
The method of the invention is not limited to these plasma and catalyst generation methods. Other systems may, for example, use a separate metal evaporator for the metal nanoparticle production, such as the systems based on transferred arc technology, which can replace the electrode erosion based nanoparticle generation. Transferred arc technology is similar to a DC torch technology, with the exception that the electric arc is “transferred” to an electrode (the anode) outside of the torch itself (see J. Feinman, editor, Plasma Technology in Metallurgical Processing, Iron & Steel Society (1987) at Chapter 7; J. R. Roth, Industrial Plasma Engineering, Vol. 1, Principles, Institute of Physics Publishing (1995) at page 382). This outside anode is typically made of the material to be treated, for example a metal, and is melted and vaporized due to the heating power of the arc. The metal vapors are transported to a reaction chamber for producing nanoparticles.
With an inductively coupled thermal plasma torch (TP-ICP) system, a radio frequency power in the megahertz range is fed to a coil surrounding a ceramic confinement tube containing a gas. Magnetic induction at a high frequency is used in a TP-ICP to couple the power to the plasma, and no electrodes are in contact with the plasma itself (see J. Feinman, editor, Plasma Technology in Metallurgical Processing, Iron & Steel Society (1987) at Chapter 7; J. R. Roth, Industrial Plasma Engineering, Vol. 1, Principles, Institute of Physics Publishing (1995) at page 382; M. I. Boulos, P. Fauchais, E. Pfender, Thermal Plasmas Fundamental and Applications, Vol. 1, Plenum Press (1994), Section 1.2.2.). Inductively coupled thermal plasma torch (TP-ICP) devices can replace the DC torch technology, as both systems provide the thermal plasma flame characteristic for CNT synthesis. The carbon precursor (e.g. TCE) in TP-ICP systems can be injected directly in the TP-ICP torch in the liquid form through a probe without the need for prior vaporization of the carbon precursor (e.g. TCE). In such a case the metal catalyst nanoparticles can be added and transported by the liquid carbon precursor and injected simultaneously in the torch plasma.
The disclosures of all patents mentioned in this description are incorporated herein by reference.
The accompanying drawings are used for purposes of illustrating the invention only and should not be used to construe the claims in a limiting fashion.
The following exemplifies the type of apparatus which may be employed to conduct the method of the invention.
A high enthalpy plasma torch an example of which is found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,147,998 can be used to generate the plasma. At the torch 1 outlet is attached a water-cooled nozzle 2 (see
In the experiments described herein, tungsten electrodes were used to generate the nano-particles of catalyst. The very high boiling point of tungsten (5660° C.) results in the metal particles being generated directly within the nozzle, and as the nearby area of the nozzle wall has a temperature typically in the range of 1000-1500° C., the resulting fast quench of the metal vapor induces nanometer size particle nucleation. In such a scenario, an significant amount of long CNT structures 35 are produced directly on the nozzle walls as seen in
One important aspect of the present application is the ability of the method to generate the nanometer sized metal particles.
Demonstration of CNT generation using the present method was made at the 55 kW power level.
Detailed Description of the Method of the Invention
The present invention can involve the use of a plasma torch 1 as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,147,998 on which a water-cooled nozzle assembly is added for carbon-containing gas injection. Typically, the material for the nozzle is tungsten when using tetrachloroethylene (TCE) as a carbon source gas. The electrodes used in the demonstration experiment were coated with tungsten, although electrode surfaces containing either Fe, Ni, Co, Cr, Mo, Pd, Pt, Ru, Rh, Hf and Gd should also show significant catalytic effects.
Using TCE as a carbon source gas, an evaporator 23 is used to transform the liquid TCE 22 (at room temperature) to a gas carried in heated lines at 200° C. with a helium or argon flow 19. Flowrates used are typically 20 standard liters per minute (slpm) of helium and 0.05 to 0.54 mol/min TCE. Higher power DC plasma torches or inductively coupled thermal plasma torches (TP-ICP) can provide the flexibility to inject the liquid TCE directly into the torch. In such cases, nanoparticles of catalyst can also be incorporated into the liquid feed and simultaneously injected into the plasma.
The plasma torch 1, nozzle 2 and carbon/carrier gas 4 feed lines are assembled to a reactor chamber 17 made of stainless-steel with water cooling 7 using a double wall system. Provision is made for access inside the chamber for product recovery on the walls and/or on a collecting plate/receptacle. For continuous operation, further provision should be made for product removal during plasma torch operation. The reactor chamber is to be operated at pressures between 200 and 800 Torr He. Experiments the results of which are shown in
Helium or argon gas is supplied to the main plasma torch 5 gas inlet at a volumetric rate of typically 200 to 225 slpm. This rate is very much dependent on the plasma torch employed. In the experiments described herein, a plasma torch sold by PyroGenesis Inc. model RPT-2, 100 kW high enthalpy plasma torch was used. The use of other torches would dictate the rate. Plasma torch operation also requires water cooling lines and electrical power line connections 6. Typically, TP-ICP plasma torch systems require much lower flowrates.
A summary of the experimental conditions used for the production of the carbon nanotubes described in the present application is provided in the following Table I.
At startup, the TCE injection system is brought up to its optimal temperature. Water cooling systems are then actuated as well as off gas cleaning systems. These comprise conventional equipment known in the art. The reactor is then evacuated to the desired pressure and a torch preheat is made in the first minute using argon or helium plasma gas and the carrier gas. This provides the high nozzle temperature for TCE injection and prevents a condensation of the TCE in the inlet lines.
The type and flow rate of plasma gas can then be adjusted to the desired values. TCE flow is admitted to the evaporator 23 and injected into the torch nozzle 2 at a desired flow rate. Adjusting the electric current supplied to the plasma torch sets the quantity of metal vapor in the main plasma stream. Tests were made with arc current at 350 A.
CNTs are produced and collected in the nozzle wall, and/or on the walls of the chamber or on collecting surfaces that may be located along the plasma jet at the outlet of the nozzle.
Generally, the current, voltage and flow rates are all interdependent parameters which depend on the plasma torch, use of metal electrode or metal particles to generate the catalyst and the plasma gas.
Preliminary demonstration experiments were made with a tungsten nozzle geometry that allows for an expansion of the plasma jet in order to provide a rapid cooling of the metal vapour at a position corresponding to TCE injection. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modeling of the temperature/flow patterns in the nozzle provided the basic knowledge for nozzle geometries enabling nucleation of the nano-particles of metal. Experiments with the expansion nozzle resulted in rapid production of tungsten nanoparticles inside the nozzle itself, solid tungsten nucleation occurring at the very high temperatures attained in this zone the system. Long CNT (mainly multi-wall nanotubes—MWNT) of over 50 micrometers in length and typically 30 nanometer in external diameter were produced from the tungsten nano-particles directly inside the nozzle expansion zone. These nanotubes were grown both in argon and helium, and were found in high concentration inside a soot adhering strongly to the nozzle walls. Experiments with increasing reactor pressure were aimed at pushing the nanotube formation outside the nozzle area into the reactor. Similarly, experiments with iron catalyst wires held and vaporized by the plasma jet outside of the reactor also allowed for CNT formation on the iron droplets projected onto the water cooled surface facing the plasma torch. This showed that providing catalyst nano-particles within the plasma jet outside of the plasma torch in a zone where atomic carbon is present enables the possibility of growing the CNT in the gas phase. Reactor optimization may be achieved through the selection of a metal electrode catalyst (for example Fe or Ni/Co) that will nucleate nano-particles downstream of the nozzle (i.e. outside the nozzle), and further inject these particles in a controlled temperature and flow velocity zone optimizing the nanotube formation and elimination of the by-products such the chlorinated compounds (mainly C2Cl4). Various nozzle geometries can be used to attain the necessary cooling rates of the metal vapours. Also, an inner wall made of a hollow cylinder of graphite is added inside the main reactor to better control the temperature and flow pattern in order to attain uniform temperature (typically around 1000° C.) and long residence times. A fast cooling of the plasma jet at the nozzle exit contributes to achieving nucleation of the metal vapour into nanometer-sized particles having a narrow size distribution.
The invention may be varied in any number of ways as would be apparent to a person skilled in the art and all obvious equivalents and the like are meant to fall within the scope of this description and claims. The description is meant to serve as a guide to interpret the claims and not to limit them unnecessarily.
This non-provisional patent application is a national stage entry of PCT/CA03/01779, filed Nov. 17, 2003, which claims priority to U.S. provisional application 60/426,407, filed Nov. 15, 2002.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA03/01779 | 11/17/2003 | WO | 00 | 1/30/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/046030 | 6/3/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5147998 | Tsantrizos et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5227038 | Smalley et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5395496 | Tsantrizos et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5482601 | Ohshima et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5753088 | Olk | May 1998 | A |
5985232 | Howard et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993697 | Cohen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6063243 | Zettl et al. | May 2000 | A |
6083469 | Leftin | Jul 2000 | A |
6099696 | Schwob et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6162411 | Howard et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6221330 | Moy et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224836 | Moisan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6261532 | Ono | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6303094 | Kusunoki et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331209 | Jang et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333016 | Resasco et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6350488 | Lee et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6451175 | Lal | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455021 | Saito | Sep 2002 | B1 |
20010050219 | Anazawa et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020179564 | Geobegan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030211030 | Olivier et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20060127299 | Harbee et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080124482 | Smiljanic et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080226536 | Smiljanic et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 385 802 | Nov 2003 | CA |
2505996 | Jun 2004 | CA |
2 499 850 | Jan 2006 | CA |
0 565 275 | Oct 1993 | EP |
07-061803 | Mar 1995 | JP |
09-188509 | Jul 1997 | JP |
2001-348215 | Dec 2008 | JP |
WO 03008331 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03062146 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2004046030 | Jun 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060127299 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60426407 | Nov 2002 | US |