Method for producing galvanized steel sheet

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a galvannealed steel sheet having excellent surface appearance and press formability and a method therefor.
2. Description of the Related Art
Recently, galvannealed steel sheets have been widely used to manufacture bodies of automobiles in order to improve the corrosion resistance. Since the galvannealed steel sheets have been used to manufacture also the outer body panel of automobiles in recent years, the quality of the surface appearance of the galvannealed steel sheet has been particularly required.
In view of reducing the weight of the car body, integral forming of car body parts and reduction in the thickness of the steel sheet have been required, steel sheets having further improved press formability is required more strongly than ever. Therefore, so called IF (Interstitial Free) steel sheets have been used, in which solute carbon and nitrogen are fixed as carbides or nitrides by titanium or the like.
It, however, has been known that use of the IF steel, having titanium added thereto (hereinafter called "Ti-IF steel"), as the substrate of the galvannealed steel sheet involves long streaky patterns (hereinafter called "streaky defect") peculiar to the Ti-added steel being generated, causing surface appearance to deteriorate excessively.
As disclosed in, for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2-34722, use of the IF steel enables the press formability to be significantly improved as compared with that of conventional low-carbon aluminum-killed steel. Since the prior art is, however, established in order to improve only the press formability, no description has been made about the improvement in the surface appearance. Another prior art paid attention to the surface appearance of the Ti-IF steel is disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2-38550. In view of the streaky defect being caused from an influence of fine crystal grains in the surface layer of the Ti-IF steel, as prevention of the streaky defect, there have been given a method for coarsening the surface crystal grains by pre-annealing or the like and another method for grinding the surface of a hot-rolled steel sheet or a cold-rolled steel sheet. In either case, the additinal step, however, is introduced to the ordinary process for manufacturing the galvannealed steel sheet and, therefore, there arises a problem in that the manufacturing cost becomes too large. Moreover, the method using the pre-annealing process causes the crystal grains to be coarsed deeply in the internal layers, thus resulting in that there will arise problems of deterioration in the workability and rough surface after press stamping. The method using the surface grinding process results in problems of worsening in the manufacturing plant environment due to the ground chips, yield declination and excessive deterioration in the productivity. Therefore, the foregoing method has a problem as a method of manufacturing a galvannealed steel sheet having excellent surface appearance. As a means for improving the strength of the IF steel, addition of solid-solution hardening elements, such as Si, Mn or P into the steel, has been usually employed, as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2-185949. In the case where the IF steel is strengthened by adding P thereto, long streaky patterns (hereinafter called the "streaky defect") frequently are formed in the rolling direction. The streaky defect sometimes inhibits application of the foregoing steel to the outer body panels of the automobile. Since the foregoing methods have been established to mainly strengthen the steel sheet and to improve the formability, no intention has been made to improve the surface appearance of the steel sheet.
In any event, the foregoing methods are unsatisfactory to improve both the press formability and surface appearance.
As described above, most of the conventional methods have been established to primarily improve the press formability without much attention paid to improvement in the surface appearance. Although there is a method for improving the surface appearance, the cost inevitably rises. Thus, there arises a problem in industrial production.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide a galvannealed steel sheet having excellent surface appearance and press formability and a manufacturing method therefor.
To attain the object, the present invention provides a steel sheet suitable for galvannealing, the steel sheet consisting essentially of C in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, N in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, Ti in an amount of 0.01 to 0.15 wt % and the balance being Fe;
said steel sheet having ferrite crystal grains in the uppermost layer thereof;
the steel sheet having a mean ferrite grain size of d1 at a point on the uppermost layer thereof, a mean ferrite grain size of d2 at a point apart from the point for at least 10 mm on the uppermost layer, mean ferrite grain size ratio R (=d1/d2) which is a ratio of the mean ferrite grain size d1 and the mean ferrite grain size d2, and Rmean which is a mean value of mean ferrite grain size ratios (R) on at least two points in the same width direction of the steel sheet; and
said Rmean being from 0.9 to 1.1.
The steel sheet can consist essentially of C in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, N in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, Ti in an amount of 0.01 to 0.15 wt %, Si in an amount of 0.05 wt % or less, Mn in an amount of 0.5 to 2.5 wt %, P in an amount of 0.02 to 0.1 wt %, S in an amount of 0.015 wt % or less, sol.Al in an amount of 0.02 to 0.1 wt % and the balance being Fe.
The steel sheet can consist essentially of C in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, N in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, Ti in an amount of 0.01 to 0.15 wt %, Si in an amount of 0.05 wt % or less, Mn in an amount of less than 0.5 wt %, P in an amount of less than 0.02 wt %, S in an amount of 0.015 wt % or less, sol.Al in an amount of 0.02 to 0.1 wt % and the balance being Fe.
A galvannealed steel sheet has a galvannealed coating layer formed on the above-mentioned steel sheet by galvannealing.
Secondly, the present invention further provides a steel sheet suitable for galvannealing, the steel sheet consisting essentially of C in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, N in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, Ti in an amount of 0.01 to 0.15 wt % and the balance being Fe;
said steel sheet having ferrite crystals in the uppermost layer thereof;
each of the ferrite crystals having a (200) plane and a (222) plane, and said (200) plane and said (222) plane having X-ray peak intensity ratios I(200) and I(222) respectively and a ratio X=I(222)/I(200);
the steel sheet having X1, which is a value of X at a first point on a surface of the steel sheet, X2, which is a value of X at a second point apart from the first point for at least 10 mm and R (=X1/X2) which is a ratio of X1 and X2; and
the steel sheet having Rmean of 0.5 to 2, said Rmean being a mean value of R at at least two points in the same widthwise direction of the steel sheet.
The steel sheet can consist essentially of C in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, N in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, Ti in an amount of 0.01 to 0.15 wt %, Si in an amount of 0.05 wt % or less, Mn in an amount of 0.5 to 2.5 wt %, P in an amount of 0.02 to 0.1 wt %, S in an amount of 0.015 wt % or less, sol.Al in an amount of 0.02 to 0.1 wt % and the balance being Fe.
The steel sheet can consist essentially of C in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, N in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, Ti in an amount of 0.01 to 0.15 wt %, Si in an amount of 0.05 wt % or less, Mn in an amount of less than 0.5 wt %, P in an amount of less than 0.02 wt %, S in an amount of 0.015 wt % or less, sol.Al in an amount of 0.02 to 0.1 wt % and the balance being Fe.
A galvannealed steel sheet has a galvannealed coating layer formed on the above-mentioned steel sheet by galvannealing.
Thirdly, the present invention further provides a method for producing a galvannealed steel sheet comprising the steps of:
(a) preparing a slab consisting essentially of C in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, N in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, Ti in an amount of 0.01 to 0.15 wt %, Si in an amount of 0.05 wt % or less, Mn in an amount of less than 0.5 wt %, P in an amount of less than 0.02 wt %, S in an amount of 0.015 wt % or less, sol.Al in an amount of 0.02 to 0.1 wt % and the balance being Fe;
(b) soaking the slab at a temperature (T.degree. C.) defined by the following equation for at least 30 minutes:
-615[%Ti]+1160.ltoreq.T.ltoreq.-385[%Ti]+1230;
(c) hot-rolling the soaked slab to produce a hot-rolled steel sheet and then coiling the hot-rolled steel sheet at a temperature of 500 to 700.degree. C.;
(d) cold-rolling the coiled hot-rolled steel sheet at a reduction ratio of 60% or more to produce a cold-rolled steel sheet;
(e) annealing the cold-rolled steel sheet at a temperature of from recrystallization temperature to Ac3 transformation temperature;
(f) galvanizing the annealed cold-rolled steel sheet; and
(g) galvannealing the galvanized cold-rolled steel sheet at a temperature of 450 to 600.degree. C.
Fourthly, the present invention further provides a method for producing a galvannealed steel sheet comprising the steps of:
(a) preparing a slab consisting essentially of C in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, N in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, Ti in an amount of 0.01 to 0.15 wt %, Si in an amount of 0.05 wt % or less, Mn in an amount of 0.5 to 2.5 wt %, P in an amount of 0.02 to 0.1 wt %, S in an amount of 0.015 wt % or less, sol.Al in an amount of 0.02 to 0.1 2() wt % and the balance being Fe;
(b) soaking the slab at a temperature (T.degree. C.) defined by the following equation for at least 30 minutes:
1100.ltoreq.T.ltoreq.([%Ti]+[%P])+1250
(c) hot-rolling the soaked slab to produce a hot-rolled steel sheet and then coiling the hot-rolled steel sheet at a temperature of 500 to 700.degree. C.;
(d) cold-rolling the coiled hot-rolled steel sheet at a reduction ratio of 60% or more to produce a cold-rolled steel sheet;
(e) annealing the cold-rolled steel sheet at a temperature of from recrystallization temperature to Ac3 transformation temperature;
(f) galvanizing the annealed cold-rolled steel sheet; and
(g) galvannealing the galvanized cold-rolled steel sheet at a temperature of 450 to 600.degree. C.
Other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be evident from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments described in conjunction with the attached drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a graph showing the relationship between Rmean, which is a mean value of a mean ferrite grain size ratio (R), and the grade of surface appearance according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is another graph showing the relationship between Rmean, which is the mean value of the mean ferrite grain size ratio (R), and the grade of the surface appearance according to the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the relationship between Rmean, which is a mean value of an X-ray intensity ratio (R) and the grade of the surface appearance according to the present invention;
FIG. 4 is another graph showing the relationship between Rmean, which is the mean value of the X-ray intensity ratio (R) and the grade of the surface appearance according to the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a graph showing influences of the content of Ti and temperature, at which a slab is heated, on the surface appearance according to the present invention;
FIG. 6 is another graph showing the influences of the content of Ti and the temperature, at which the slab is heated, on the surface appearance according to the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a graph showing an influence of the content of B on the surface appearance and mean r-value (rmean) according to the present invention;
FIG. 8 is another graph showing the influence of the content of B on the surface appearance and the mean r-value (rmean) according to the present invention;
FIG. 9 is a further graph showing the influence of the content of B on the surface appearance and the mean r-value (rmean) according to the present invention;
FIG. 10 is a graph showing the relationship between galvannealing temperature and the surface appearance according to the present invention;
FIG. 11 is a further graph showing the influence of the content of B on the surface appearance and the mean r-value (rmean) according to the present invention; and
FIG. 12 is another graph showing the relationship between galvannealing temperature and the surface appearance according to the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The inventors of the present invention have performed research and attained the following knowledge:
(1) Important is a size distribution of ferrite grains in the uppermost layer of the substrate steel sheet after annealing and before galvanizing to obtain a galvannealed steel sheet having good press formability and excellent surface appearance.
That is, the coating layer of the steel sheet having the streaky defects was dissolved and removed with dilute hydrochloric acid to inspect the distribution of ferrite grains from the surface of the steel sheet. As the result of inspection, the following was found.
(a) The mean size of crystal grains in the surface of the steel sheet just below the portion having the streaky defect is larger than that in the normal portions.
(b) The smaller the difference in the mean grain size of the ferrite between the normal portions and the portion having the streaky defect, the less inconspicuous the streaky defect becomes.
From the foregoing, the inventors learned that the distribution of the grain size of ferrite in the surface layer of the substrate steel sheet is not uniform and that regions having large crystal grains exist in the streaky shapes. Thus, the alloying rate is reduced as compared with that in the normal portions and, thus, the finally obtained coating layer has different surface shapes. As a result, the streaky defect takes place.
In accordance with the foregoing findings, one aspect of the present invention is as follows:
A steel sheet suitable for galvannealing, the steel sheet consisting essentially of C in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, N in an amount of 0.004 wt % or less, Ti in an amount of 0.01 to 0.15 wt % and the balance being Fe, wherein the ratio of mean ferrite grain size d1 in the uppermost layer at a certain point on the steel sheet and mean ferrite grain size d2 in the uppermost layer at a point apart from the foregoing point for at least 10 mm is defined to be R (=d1/d2) and mean value Rmean of R of at least two points in the same widthwise direction of the steel sheet is from 0.9 to 1.1.
The foregoing steel sheet can further contain 0.05 wt % or less Si, 0.5 to 2.5 wt % Mn, 0.02 to 0.1 wt % P, 0.015 wt % or less S and 0.02 to 0.1 wt % sol.Al. Also, the steel sheet can further contain 0.05 wt % or less Si, less than 0.5 wt % Mn, less than 0.02 wt % P, 0.015 wt % or less S and 0.02 to 0.1 wt % sol.Al. The steel sheet can further contain 0.001 to 0.020 wt % Nb. The steel sheet can further contain 0.0001 to 0.0020 wt % B. Each of the foregoing steel sheets is galvanizing after annealing, and then galvannealed to produce a galvannealed steel sheet. Forming of a galvanized coating layer, such as a Fe--Zn coating layer containing 50 wt. % or more Fe, on the surface of the obtained galvannealed steel sheet will attain further improved press formability.
(2) Moreover, the inventors found that it is important to control texture in the uppermost layer of the substrate steel sheet subjected to the annealing process in order to obtain a galvannealed steel sheet excellent in surface appearance. That is, the coating layer of the steel sheet which has produced the streaky defect is dissolved and removed by diluted hydrochloric acid to measure the texture of crystal grains immediately below the coating layer by X-ray diffraction. As a result, there is found the difference in the texture in the uppermost layer of the steel sheet between the normal portions and the streaky defect portions. In particular, it is found conspicuous streaky defect takes place in proportion to the difference in the diffractive intensity between plane (222) and plane (200). If the texture of ferrite in the uppermost layer of the substrate steel sheet are non-uniform in the width direction of the steel sheet, the difference in the alloying rate on ferrite crystal grains is made and a streaky defect, which can be recognized totally, takes place. As a result, it is important for the improvement in the surface appearance to make uniform the texture in the surface layer of the substrate steel sheet.
In accordance with the foregoing finding, further aspects of the present invention are established as follows:
There is provided a galvannealed steel sheet having excellent surface appearance and press formability and consisting essentially of 0.004 wt % or less C, 0.004 wt % or less N and 0.01 to 0.15 wt % Ti, wherein when X-ray peak intensity ratios (I/I0) of planes (200) and (222) of ferrite in the uppermost layer of the steel sheet are defined to be I(200) and I(222), their ratio is defined to be x=I(222)/I(200) and the ratio of the value of x (x1) at a certain point on the steel sheet and the value of x (x2) at a point apart from the foregoing point for at least 10 mm in the width direction of the steel sheet is defined to be R (=x1/x2), mean value Rmean of R at two or more positions in the same width direction is from 0.5 to 2.0.
The foregoing steel sheet can further contain 0.05 wt % or less Si, 0.5 to 2.5 wt % Mn, 0.02 to 0.1 wt % P, 0.015 wt % or less S and 0.02 to 0.1 wt % sol. Al. The steel sheet can further contain 0.05 wt % or less Si, less than 0.5 wt % Mn, less than 0.02 wt % P, 0.015 wt % or less S and 0.02 to 0.1 wt % sol. Al. The steel sheet can further contain 0.001 to 0.020 wt % Nb. The steel sheet can further contain 0.0001 to 0.0020 wt % B. Each of the foregoing steel sheets is galvanized after annealing, and then galvannealed to produce a galvannealed steel sheet. Forming of a coating layer, such as a Fe--Zn coating layer containing 50 wt. % or more Fe, on the surface of the obtained galvannealed steel sheet will attain further improved press formability.
(3) Moreover, the inventors examined the cause of the non-uniformity in the ferrite grain size distribution and the texture in the substrate steel sheet subjected to annealing and obtained the following knowledge. That is, in the Ti-IF steel, Ti in the Ti-IF steel is combined with C, S, N and P. Thus, precipitates TiC, Ti4C2S2, TiS, TiN, FeTiP and the like are formed. The precipitates are formed during slab casting. However, the quantities and sizes of the precipitates involve a local scatter which is attributable to the cast structures. During slab heating, the precipitates are re-dissolved and/or coarsed, thus causing the local scatter to be further remarkable. The non-uniform re-dissolution and re-precipitation of the precipitates induces the shapes (sizes) of the precipitates to be to different from one another locally. As a result, it has been found that the growth rate of the ferrite grains is made to be different, thus causing the recrystallized grain size and the crystal orientation distribution after cold rolling and annealing to become irregular.
Since a Ti-IF steel in general has the grain boundary having superior cleanness to that of low-carbon aluminum-killed steel, rapid Fe--Zn reactions, called "outburst reaction" can easily occur at the grain boundary during alloying. Thus, the alloying rate is determined depending upon the foregoing reactions. The inventors found that the outburst reactions do not simultaneously occur in all grain boundaries but can easily take place on the (100) plane and grain boundaries in the vicinity of crystals having the orientation approximating that of the (100) plane. If the size or the orientation of the crystals, existing in the uppermost layer of the steel sheet after the recrystallization and annealing, encounters an irregularity, the alloying reactions cannot be performed uniformly. Therefore, the alloying rate can be made different locally, thus resulting in the locally remaining irregular degree of alloying being recognized as the streaky defect. As a result of the investigation above, the inventors found that the generation of irregularity above can be prevented by making uniform the form (size) of precipitates in the steel sheet. Also they found that for the realization, there are an appropriate range of temperatures for slab heating and the appropriate temperature range is different depending upon the addition amount of Ti or those of Ti and P.
In accordance with the foregoing knowledge, a still further aspect of the present invention is established as follows:
There is provided a method for producing a galvannealed steel sheet having excellent surface appearance and press formability, the method comprising the steps of: soaking, at temperature (T) defined by the following equation for 30 minutes or more, a slab consisting essentially of 0.004 wt % or less C, 0.004 wt % or less N, 0.01 to 0.15 wt % Ti, 0.05 wt % or less Si, less than 0.5 wt % Mn, less than 0.02 wt % P, 0.015 wt % or less S and 0.02 to 0.1 wt % sol. Al; hot-rolling the soaked slab to produce a hot-rolled steel sheet and then coiling the hot-rolled steel sheet at a temperature of 500 to 700.degree. C.; cold-rolling the coiled hot-rolled steel sheet at a reduction ratio of 60% or more to produce a cold-rolled steel sheet; annealing the cold-rolled steel sheet at a temperature of from recrystallization temperature to Ac3 transformation temperature; galvanizing the annealed cold-rolled steel sheet; and galvannealing the galvanized cold-rolled steel sheet at a temperature of 450 to 600.degree. C.:
-615[%Ti]+1160.ltoreq.T.ltoreq.-385[%Ti]+1230 (A)
Further, instead of the foregoing, there is provided a method of producing a galvannealed steel sheet having excellent surface appearance and press formability, the method comprising the steps of: soaking, at a temperature (T) of from 1100.degree. C. to {-400 ([%Ti]+[%P])+1250.degree. C.} for 30 minutes or more, a slab consisting essentially of 0.004 wt % or less C, 0.05 wt % or less Si, 0.5 to 2.5 wt % Mn, 0.02 to 0.1 wt % P, 0.015 wt % or less S, 0.02 to 0.1 wt % sol. Al, 0.0040 wt % or less N and 0.01 to 0.15 wt % Ti; hot-rolling the soaked slab to produce a hot-rolled steel sheet and then coiling the hot-rolled steel sheet at a temperature of 500 to 700.degree. C.; cold-rolling the coiled hot-rolled steel sheet at a reduction ratio of 60% or more to produce a cold-rolled steel sheet; annealing the cold-rolled steel sheet at a temperature of from recrystallization temperature to Ac3 transformation temperature; galvanizing the annealed cold-rolled steel sheet; and galvannealing the galvanized cold-rolled steel sheet at a temperature of 450 to 600.degree. C.
The slab can further contains 0.001 wt % to 0.020 wt % of Nb or 0.0001 wt % to 0.0020 wt % of B. The foregoing steel sheet is, after annealing, galvanized and then galvannealed to produce a galvannealed steel sheet. Forming of a coating layer, such as a Fe--Zn coating layer containing 50 wt % or more Fe, on the surface of the obtained galvannealed steel sheet will attain further improved press formability.
(1) Reasons for limitation of steel composition of the steel is
C: Although it is preferable that the content of carbon be small to realize a large r-value, the upper limit of the content is determined to be 0.004 wt. % to attain the practical effect of the present invention.
N: Although it is preferable that the content of nitrogen be small to achieve a large r-value, the upper limit of the content is determined to be 0.004 wt. % to attain the practical effect of the present invention.
Ti: Titanium is added to fix solid solution carbon and nitrogen in the steel so as to obtain a large r-value. If the content of titanium is too large, the object of the present invention to prevent generation of the streaky defect cannot easily be achieved. The content of titanium is determined in view that if the content is less than 0.01 wt. %, then the effect of obtaining a large r-value cannot be obtained, and that if the content is larger than 0.15 wt. %, not only the foregoing effect cannot be improved but also the prevention of the streaky defect encounters a difficulty. Therefore, a preferred titanium content range is 0.01 to 0.15 wt. %.
In a case of high press formability, it is preferable that the range of addition of titanium be limited to
Ti*/C(atomic ratio).gtoreq.4
where Ti*=Ti=(48/32)S-(48/14)N
Nb: Also Nb is effective to prevent the streaky defect. The reason is that addition of Nb in a small quantity results in NbC being formed in the steel and the formed NbC being then again solid-dissolved in the ferrite when annealing is performed. As a result, a portion of carbon segregates into the ferrite grain boundaries and, thus, the outburst reactions in the grain boundary are inhibited. If the content is less than 0.001 wt. %, the desired effect cannot be obtained. If the content is more than 0.020 wt. %, the effect is saturated but the formability of the steel sheet is deteriorated. Thus, the content is determined as described above.
Si: Si is an effective element to serve as a reinforcing element capable of improving the yield strength and the tensile strength. If the content is more than 0.05 wt. %, the r-value of the steel sheet is deteriorated. What is worse, streaky defects take place due to Si in the steel when annealing is performed, resulting in the surface appearance becoming deteriorated. Therefore, the content is determined to be 0.05% or less.
Mn: Similarly to Si, Mn is effective to reinforce the steel sheet. If the content is too large, the r-value of the steel sheet is deteriorated. Therefore, the content of Mn is determined to be 2.5% or less. It is preferable that the content be less than 0.5% for soft steel of a type which must have excellent deep drawability. The content may be 0.5% to 2.5% for steel having high strength which must be both excellent deep drawability and improved strength.
P: P is an element capable of reinforcing the steel with the lowest cost. If the content is too large, the alloying reactions are inhibited, irregularity takes place during alloying and the surface appearance is deteriorated. Therefore, the content is determined to be 0.1% or less.
As described hereinafter, it is preferable that control of the temperature for soaking be varied depending upon the contents of Mn and P. That is, if less than 0.5 wt. % of Mn and less than 0.02 wt. % P are contained, the temperature range for soaking is determined to correspond to the content of Ti. If the content of Mn is 0.5 wt. % to 2.5 wt. % and that of P is 0.02 wt. % to 0.1 wt. %, it is preferable that the temperature for soaking be determined to correspond to the contents of Ti and P.
S: Since S causes the ductility of the steel sheet to deteriorate, it is preferable that the content be minimized. To achieve the practical effect of the present invention, the upper limit is determined to be 0.015 wt. %.
sol. Al: Aluminum content is required to be 0.02 wt. % or more for deoxidation. If the quantity is too large, the cost cannot be reduced. Therefore, the upper limit is determined to be 0.10 wt. %.
B: B is an important element to be added in the present invention. That is, addition of B results in the reactivity in the ferrite crystal grain boundary being allowed to deteriorate and, therefore, the outburst reactions being inhibited and thus the streaky defect being prevented. If the streaky defect cannot be prevented by controlling the grain size distribution or by controlling the texture in the surface layer, addition of B will prevent the streaky defect. If the content is less than 0.0001 wt. %, the foregoing effect cannot be obtained. If the content is more than 0.0020%, the formability of the steel sheet remarkably deteriorates. Because of the foregoing reasons, the content is determined to be in the foregoing range.
(2) Reason for limitation of the crystal size
In the present invention, the ratio of the crystal grain sizes is determined as a result of the following experiments.
Steel sample shown in Tables 1 and 2 were heated at 1150 to 1250.degree. C., and then the samples were hot-rolled so that the thickness of each sample was reduced to 3.2 mm, followed by being coiled at 550 to 700.degree. C. The samples were acid-pickled, and then cold-rolled to have a thickness of 0.7 mm, and then continuously annealed at 800 to 880.degree. C. Then, the samples were galvanized in a coating weight of 60 g/m.sup.2 per surface, and then the samples were galvannealed at 460 to 550.degree. C. Each of the obtained steel sheets was subjected to a temper rolling with a reduction ratio of 0.7% to obtain steel samples. The surface appearance of the obtained steel sheet was evaluated by five grades such as the best (no streaky defect observed) was given by 5 points and the worst (unsatisfactory streaky defect observed) by 1 point. Moreover, normal galvannealed portions and defective galvannealed portions, which could be determined by visual inspection from the surface appearance, were processed by dissolving and removing the coating layer thereon with a water solution of 5% HCl to observe ferrite grains in the surface layer of the steel sheet just therebelow and the mean grain sizes were observed. The method of measuring the mean grain size was performed in accordance with the cutting method regulated in JIS G0552 such that the grain size number was converted into the mean grain size. Moreover, the mean grain size in the uppermost layer in the normal portions was made to be d1 and the mean grain size in the uppermost layer in the streaky defect portions was made to be d2 when R was obtained. When no streaky defect took place, a convenient method was employed in which d1 in the lengthwise central portion of the coil and in the central portion of the widthwise direction of the same and d2 at a point apart from d1 for 30 mm to the right in the forward direction of the line were measured to obtain R1. Moreover, in the same widthwise direction as the widthwise direction in which R1 was measured, d at a point, for mm, apart from the portion, in which the samples, d2 of which were measured were taken, to the right in the forward direction of the line and d at a point, for 30 mm, apart from the foregoing point to the right in the forward direction of the line were measured so that R2 was obtained. The foregoing operations were repeated seven times to the right in the forward direction of the line so that mean R value (Rmean) was obtained from all of the R values.
The grades of the surface appearance were evaluated by Rmean, thus resulting in values shown in FIG. 1 (in the case of the composition of the steel shown in Table 1) and FIG. 2 (in the case of the composition of the steel shown in Table 2). In either case, a galvannealed steel sheet was obtained when Rmean was in a range from 0.9 to 1.1.
The inventors examined a variety of steel samples in addition to the steel samples shown in Tables 1 and 2, thus resulting in that excellent surface appearance can be realized if Rmean is in the range from 0.9 to 1.1 in the case of the range of the composition of the steel according to the present invention. Therefore, the grain size ratio Rmean was limited to the range from 0.9 to 1.1.
TABLE 1______________________________________C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti______________________________________0.0022 0.02 0.18 0.009 0.007 0.055 0.0025 0.063(wt %)______________________________________
TABLE 2______________________________________C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti______________________________________0.0022 0.02 0.65 0.043 0.009 0.063 0.0021 0.078(wt %)______________________________________
(3) Reason for determination of the texture
In the present invention, the texture in the uppermost layer of the substrate steel sheet was limited as described above as a result hi of the following experiments and the like.
The steel samples having the compositions shown in Tables 1 and 2 were heated to 1150 to 1250.degree. C., and then hot-rolled to reduce the thickness to 3.2 ml, followed by being coiled into coils at 550 to 700.degree. C. The samples were acid-pickled, and then cold-rolled to have a thickness of 0.7 mm, and then continuously annealed at 800 to 880.degree. C.
Then, the samples were galvanized in a coating weight of 60 g/m.sup.2 per surface, and then the samples were galvannealed at 460 to 550.degree. C. Each of the obtained steel sheets was temper-rolled with a reduction ratio of 0.7% to produce a steel sheet product. The surface appearance of the obtained steel sheet was evaluated by five grades such as the best (no streaky defect observed) was given by 5 points and the worst (streaky defect remarkably observed) was given by 1 point. Moreover, normal galvannealed portions and defective galvannealed portions, which could be determined visually from the appearance, were processed by measuring X-ray diffractive intensity of the portions of the base steel sheet just below the coating layer in the normal and streaky defect portions. When no streaky defect took place, a convenient method was employed in which x1 in the lengthwise central portion of the coil and in the central portion of the widthwise direction of the same and x2 at a point apart from the foregoing point for 40 mm to the right in the forward direction of the line were measured to obtain R1. Moreover, in the same widthwise direction as the widthwise direction in which. R1 was measured, x at a point, for 40 mm, apart from the portion, in which the samples, x2 of which were measured were taken, to the right in the forward direction of the line and x at a point, for 40 mm, apart from the foregoing point to the right in the forward direction of the line were measured so that R2 was obtained. The foregoing operations were repeated seven times to the right in the forward direction of the line so that mean R value (Rmean) was obtained from all of the R values. The samples subjected to the X-ray diffraction had a diameter of 28 mm. The coating layer of each sample was separated by diluted hydrochloric acid before the X-ray diffraction was performed.
The results were shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. When the values of a were in a range from 0.5 to 2.0, galvannealed steel sheets having excellent surface appearance were obtained.
In the present invention, the X-ray diffraction intensity was a value measured by using a Mo tube under conditions that the applied voltage was 40 kV and an electric current was 30 mA. Moreover, I(222) and I(200) were defined as follows:
I(hkl)=[I(hkl)m.IB]]/I(hkl)S
I(hkl)m: intensity counted on plane (hkl)
IB: background intensity
I(hkl)S: integrated intensity on plane (hkl) of standard sample of reduced Fe The inventors investigated a variety of steel samples in addition to the steel samples shown in Tables 1 and 2. As a result, excellent steel sheets having excellent surface appearance were able to be manufactured without the streaky defect if Rmean is in the range from 0.5 to 2.0 in the case where the composition of the steel sheet was included in the range according to the present invention. According to the present invention, the control of the texture in the surface layer as described above does not cause the press formability to deteriorate because the texture in the direction of the width of the steel sheet can be maintained to be the same as those of the conventional steel sheet. Therefore, the present invention enables a galvannealed steel sheet having excellent surface appearance and press formability to be manufactured.
(4) Reason for determination of manufacturing method
(4.1) Control of temperature depending upon Ti content (in case of P content being less than 0.02 wt. %)
Steel samples having compositions shown in Table 3 were melted to be formed into slabs, and then soaked at 1050 to 1300.degree. C. for 60 minutes. Then, the slabs were hot-rolled to each have a thickness of 3.2 mm and then coiled into coils at 640.degree. C. The obtained hot-rolled sheets were acid-pickled and then cold-rolled to have a thickness of 0.8 mm, followed by being continuously annealed at temperature of 830.degree. C. Then, the samples were galvanized in a coating weight of 60 g/m.sup.2 per surface, and then immediately galvannealed as an alloying treatment at temperature of 510.degree. C., and then temper-rolled with a reduction ratio of 0.7%. The surface appearance characteristics of the obtained products were evaluated by five grades (from worst given 1 point to best given 5 points). The results were shown in FIG. 5. Products having mark four or better can be obtained if the temperature at which the slabs are heated, is appropriate. This can be expressed by the following regression equation:
-615[%Ti]+1160.ltoreq.T.ltoreq.-385[%Ti]+1230 (A)
The inventors gave steel samples having a variety of compositions in similar experiments and found that the regression equation can be satisfied if the steel has the composition within the range of the present invention.
As described above, the samples are soaked at a temperature defined by Equation (A) for 30 minutes or more. The reason why the slab is soaked for 30 minutes or more is that the precipitates formed at slab casting are caused to sufficiently grow so as to make the structure uniform. If the time is less than 30 minutes, the precipitates cannot sufficiently be precipitated. The time, in which the slab is soaked, is substantially the same as the slab holding time in a soaking furnace or a soaking zone. After the slab has been heated, the slab is hot-rolled. Although the finishing temperature is not specifically limited, it is preferable that the temperature be Ar3 transformation temperature or more. If certain conditions are met, for example, if hot lubrication is performed sufficiently, the temperature is not limited to the foregoing level. After the hot rolling has been performed, the steel is coiled into a coil at a temperature in a range from 500 to 700.degree. C. If the temperature is less than 500.degree. C., the press formability deteriorates. If the temperature is more than 700.degree. C., the press formability deteriorates similarly and the descalability deteriorates, thus causing the surface defects. Thus, the temperature is defined as described above. After hot rolling has been performed, the samples are acid-pickled by a usual method and then cold-rolled at a reduction ratio of 60% or more. The reason is that if the reduction ratio is less than 60%, satisfactory press formability cannot be obtained. Although the upper limit for the reduction ratio in performing the cold rolling is not specifically limited, it is preferable that the ratio be less than 90%, taking into consideration of load being applied to the rolling mill. After cold rolling, annealing for recrystallization is performed at preferred level of less than AC3 transformation temperature. If the annealing is performed at a level of more than the AC3 transformation temperature, the press formability are remarkably deteriorated. After the annealing, the samples are galvanized by a usual method, and then the coating weight is adjusted.
Then, the galvannealing as alloying treatment is performed. It is preferable that the galvannealing temperature (alloying temperature) be 450 to 600.degree. C. If the temperature is less than 450.degree. C. the alloying rate is too low and, therefore, the productivity deteriorates remarkably. What is worse, the streaky defect becomes conspicuous. If the temperature is more than 600.degree. C., excess alloying takes place, anti-powdering property deteriorates and the streaky defect becomes conspicuous. After the galvannealing has been performed, temper rolling may be performed if necessary. In this case, the reduction ratio is in a range from 0.3 to 2%. If the product is required to have further improved press formability, a Fe--Zn alloy having a Fe content of 50 wt. % or more can be electroplated to the surface of the coating layer.
TABLE 3______________________________________C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti______________________________________0.0015 0.01 0.15 0.012 0.005 0.04 0.0019 0.012to to to to to to to to0.0025 0.04 0.31 0.015 0.012 0.06 0.0025 0.182(wt %)______________________________________
(4.2) Control of temperature depending upon Ti and P contents (in the case of the P content being 0.02 to 0.100 wt. %)
Steel samples having compositions shown in Table 4 were melted to be formed into slabs, and then heated at 1100 to 1300.degree. C. Then, the slabs were hot-rolled to each have a thickness of 3.2 mm and then formed into coils at 640.degree. C. The obtained hot-rolled sheets were acid-pickled and then cold-rolled to have a thickness of 0.8 mm, followed by being continuously annealed at temperature of 830.degree. C. Then, the samples were galvanized in a coating weight of 60 g/m.sup.2 per surface, and then immediately galvannealed at temperature of 510.degree. C., and then temper rolled with a reduction ratio of 0.7%. The surface appearance characteristics of the obtained products were evaluated by five grades from worst given by 1 point to best by 5 point. The results are shown in FIG. 6. Products having marks of four or better can be obtained if the temperature at which the slabs are heated, is appropriate. Moreover, the appropriate temperature changes depending upon the content of Ti and P in the steel. This can be expressed by the following regression equation:
-400([%Ti]+[%P])+1250 (B)
If the slabs are heated at a temperature of less than 1100.degree. C., the load applied during rolling is too heavy for the rolling mill. Therefore, the lower limit of the temperature was determined to be 1100.degree. C.
The inventors gave steel samples having a variety of compositions in similar experiments and found that the regression equation can be satisfied if the steel had the composition within the range of the present invention. The reason why the upper limit temperature, at which the slab is heated, is changed due to addition of P is considered that P exists as precipitates in the form of FeTiP and the like, thus causing the forms of Ti precipitates to be changed.
As described above, the samples are soaked at a temperature defined by Equation (B) for 30 minutes or more. The reason why the slab is soaked for 30 minutes or more is that the precipitates formed at slab casting are caused to sufficiently grow so as to make the structure uniform. If the time is less than 30 minutes, precipitates cannot sufficiently be precipitated. The time, in which the slab is soaked, is substantially the same as the slab holding time in a soaking furnace or a soaking zone. After the slab has been heated, the slab is hot-rolled. Although the finishing temperature is not specifically limited, it is preferable that the temperature be Ar3 transformation temperature or more. If certain conditions are met, for example, if hot lubrication is performed sufficiently, the temperature is not limited to the foregoing level. After hot rolling, the steel is coiled into a coil at a temperature in a range from 500 to 700.degree. C. If the temperature is less than 500.degree. C., the press formability deteriorates. If the temperature is 700.degree. C. or more, the press formability deteriorates similarly and the descalability deteriorates, thus causing the surface defect. As a result, the temperature is determined as described above. After hot rolling, the samples are acid-pickled by a usual method and then cold-rolled at a reduction ratio of 60% or more. The reason for this is that if the reduction ratio is less than 60%, satisfactory press formability cannot be obtained. Although the upper limit for the reduction ratio of the cold rolling is not specific, it is preferable that the ratio be less than 90% taking into consideration a load being applied to the rolling mill. After cold rolling, annealing for recrystallization is performed at a preferred level of less than AC3 transformation temperature. If the annealing is performed at a level of more than the AC3 transformation temperature, the press formability is remarkably deteriorated. After the annealing, the samples are galvanized by a usual method, and then the coating weight is adjusted. Then, galvannealing as the alloying treatment is performed. It is preferable that the galvannealing temperature be 450 to 600.degree. C. If the temperature is less than 450.degree. C., the alloying rate is too low and, therefore, the productivity remarkably deteriorates. What is worse, the streaky defect becomes conspicuous. If the temperature is more than 600.degree. C., excess alloying takes place, anti-powdering property deteriorates and the streaky defect becomes conspicuous. After the galvannealing has been performed, temper rolling may be performed if necessary. In this case, the reduction ratio be in a range from 0.3 to 2%. If the product is required to have further improved press formability, a Fe--Zn alloy containing Fe in 50 wt. % or more may be electroplated on the surface of the coating layer.
TABLE 4______________________________________C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti______________________________________0.0019 0.01 0.77 0.015 0.007 0.045 0.0019 0.018to to to to to to to to0.0024 0.03 0.82 0.105 0.011 0.061 0.0022 0.109(wt %)______________________________________
EXAMPLES
Examples of the present invention will now be described. Example 1 (in the case of Mn: less than 0. 5 wt. %, P: less than 0. 02 wt. % and the grain size: to be limited)
Example 1-1
Steel having a composition shown in Table 5 was hot-rolled into a hot-rolled steel sheet in thickness of 4.0 mm and then coiled into a coil at 620.degree. C. The hot-rolled steel sheet was acid-pickled and then cold-rolled into a cold-rolled steel sheet in thickness of 0.8 mm. The steel was continuously annealed at 850.degree. C. and then galvanized in a coating weight of 45 g/m.sup.2 per surface. Then, the steel sheet was galvannealed at 510.degree. C. as alloying treatment. The obtained steel sheet was temper-rolled with a reduction ratio of 0.7% to obtain a final product. The press formability of the obtained steel sheet was evaluated in such a manner that a tensile test piece was extracted from the obtained product (a test piece conforming to JIS-#5) to measure the r-value. The r-value was evaluated in such a manner that those in directions of angles of 0 degree, 45 degrees and 90 degrees with regard to the rolling direction were measured and the following equation was employed to perform evaluation as mean r-value (rmean). The surface appearance of the obtained steel sheet was evaluated in the before-mentioned five grade system.
rmean=1/4(r0+2r45+r90)
The results were shown in FIG. 7. Although B is very effective to improve the surface appearance if it is added with a concentration of 1 ppm or more, rmean deteriorates remarkably if B is added with a concentration of 20 ppm.
TABLE 5______________________________________ sol.C Si Mn P S Al N Ti B______________________________________.ltoreq.0.0030 .ltoreq.0.02 0.2 0.005 0.005 0.04 .ltoreq.0.0030 0.04 0 to to to to to to 0.3 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.0025(wt %)______________________________________
Example 1-2
Steel samples having compositions shown in Tables 6, 7 and 8 were melted to form slab and then the slab was hot-rolled in an ordinary manner to produce hot-rolled steel sheets. The hot-rolled steel sheets were acid-pickled in a usual way and then cold-rolled into cold-rolled steel sheets in thickness of 0.7 mm. Then, the steel samples were continuously annealed at 770.degree. C. to 880.degree. C., and thereafter galvanized on a continuous galvanizing line in a coating weight of 60 g/m.sup.2 per surface. Then, the samples were galvannealed at 470 to 550.degree. C. and then temper-rolled with a reduction ratio of 0.7%. A portion of the samples was applied with Fe--Zn plating to the surface of the coating layer thereof to obtain a final product. The surface appearance of each of the products was evaluated by the five grade system before-mentioned. Then, tensile test pieces were extracted from the products to be subjected to mechanical tests. The rmean was measured by the before-mentioned method. The R value was also measured by the before-mentioned method. Results are shown in Tables 6, 7 and 8.
The steel samples of the present invention (No. 1 to No. 24 shown in Tables 6 and 7) resulted in steel sheets having satisfactory rmean and surface appearance being obtained. Comparative Examples 25, 27 and 28 resulted in low rmean because of large contents of C, Mn and P therein. Since Comparative Example 26 contains S in a large quantity, the surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 29 contained Ti in a small quantity, rmean was too small. Since Comparative Example 30 contained B in a large quantity, rmean deteriorated. Since Comparative Examples 31, 32 and 33 (see Table 8) attained rmean which did not satisfy the scope of the present invention, the surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 34 shown in Table 8 contained Nb in a large quantity, rmean deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 35 contained Ti in a large quantity, its rmean did not satisfy the scope of the present invention and the surface appearance deteriorated.
TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________ PlatingSample for EvaluationSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %) Upper R r of Ap-No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B Layer mean mean pearance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________1 0.0020 0.02 0.33 0.008 0.008 0.056 0.0021 0.046 -- -- X 0.92 2.24 5 Example2 0.0621 0.01 0.41 0.007 0.010 0.049 0.0023 0.065 -- -- X 1.02 2.26 5 Example3 0.0018 0.02 0.32 0.009 0.011 0.055 0.0020 0.089 -- -- .largecircle. 1.03 2.40 5 Example4 0.0021 0.03 0.28 0.009 0.009 0.048 0.0021 0.021 -- 0.0003 X 1.08 2.05 5 Example5 0.0022 0.01 0.25 0.008 0.007 0.061 0.0022 0.051 -- 0.0005 .largecircle. 1.00 2.06 5 Example6 0.0025 0.02 0.29 0.015 0.006 0.071 0.0019 0.086 -- 0.0004 X 0.98 2.02 5 Example7 0.0028 0.02 0.14 0.018 0.009 0.048 0.0023 0.037 -- -- X 0.99 2.21 5 Example8 0.0026 0.04 0.16 0.011 0.011 0.056 0.0024 0.058 -- -- X 1.01 2.18 5 Example9 0.0021 0.01 0.22 0.003 0.007 0.060 0.0022 0.096 -- -- X 0.91 2.10 5 Example10 0.0032 0.03 0.26 0.012 0.006 0.049 0.0026 0.044 -- 0.0009 .largecircle. 1.01 2.03 5 Example11 0.0019 0.02 0.33 0.004 0.007 0.055 0.0021 0.060 -- 0.0017 X 1.02 2.02 5 Example12 0.0016 0.02 0.21 0.015 0.009 0.048 0.0019 0.058 -- 0.0070 X 1.60 2.15 5 Example13 0.0020 0.02 0.25 0.013 0.010 0.059 0.0020 0.122 -- 0.0007 .largecircle. 1.05 2.43 5 Example14 0.0021 0.01 0.26 0.009 0.007 0.063 0.0026 0.108 -- 0.0005 X 1.01 2.39 5 Example15 0.0022 0.01 0.25 0.011 0.009 0.058 0.0021 0.095 0.009 0.0003 X 1.03 2.35 5 Example16 0.0023 0.01 0.28 0.016 0.007 0.065 0.0019 0.088 0.012 0.0004 .largecircle. 1.05 2.20 5 Example__________________________________________________________________________ Mark ".largecircle." means plating and mark "X" means not plating.
TABLE 7__________________________________________________________________________ PlatingSample for EvaluationSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %) Upper R r of Ap-No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B Layer mean mean pearance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________17 0.0022 0.03 0.30 0.011 0.008 0.070 0.0022 0.075 0.015 -- X 1.07 2.01 5 Example18 0.0023 0.02 0.44 0.017 0.007 0.065 0.0021 0.025 0.008 -- X 1.01 2.02 5 Example19 0.0024 0.02 0.25 0.013 0.012 0.066 0.0019 0.044 0.009 -- .largecircle. 1.03 2.11 5 Example20 0.0022 0.03 0.19 0.011 0.009 0.072 0.0022 0.045 0.007 0.0003 X 1.05 2.08 5 Example21 0.0025 0.04 0.22 0.013 0.008 0.063 0.0021 0.072 0.015 0.0005 .largecircle. 1.03 2.07 5 Example22 0.0022 0.02 0.31 0.014 0.007 0.065 0.0022 0.140 -- 0.0008 .largecircle. 1.09 2.40 5 Example23 0.0023 0.01 0.25 0.017 0.009 0.070 0.0021 0.065 0.016 -- X 0.98 2.20 5 Example24 0.0021 0.01 0.28 0.016 0.009 0.054 0.0022 0.138 -- 0.0006 X 0.99 2.40 5 Example25 0.0037* 0.02 0.17 0.009 0.014 0.056 0.0028 0.045 -- -- X 1.01 1.77 5 Comparative Example26 0.0021 0.08* 0.16 0.010 0.009 0.060 0.0021 0.061 -- -- .largecircle. 1.00 2.21 5 Comparative Example27 0.0020 0.03 0.53* 0.008 0.008 0.055 0.0026 0.033 -- -- X 1.02 1.83 5 Comparative Example28 0.0022 0.01 0.22 0.023* 0.009 0.061 0.0021 0.081 -- -- X 0.99 1.85 5 Comparative Example29 0.0019 0.02 0.26 0.007 0.006 0.070 0.0020 0.003* -- -- .largecircle. 1.01 1.71 5 Comparative Example30 0.0018 0.02 0.28 0.009 0.013 0.043 0.0022 0.693 -- 0.0024* X 1.02 1.65 5 Comparative Example31 0.0024 0.03 0.31 0.006 0.012 0.052 0.0021 0.085 -- -- X 1.12* 2.01 4 Comparative Example32 0.0023 0.01 0.46 0.007 0.010 0.055 0.0028 0.099 -- -- .largecircle. 0.81* 2.25 1 Comparative Example__________________________________________________________________________ Asterisk "*" indicates the results out of the scope of the present invention Mark ".largecircle." means plating and mark "X" means not plating.
TABLE 8__________________________________________________________________________ PlatingSample for EvaluationSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %) Upper R r of Ap-No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B Layer mean mean pearance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________33 0.0021 0.02 0.25 0.007 0.010 0.065 0.0022 0.095 -- -- .largecircle. 1.88* 2.40 2 Comparative34 0.0022 0.03 0.26 0.015 0.009 0.066 0.0020 0.078 0.022* -- X 0.98 1.88 5 Comparative Example35 0.0023 0.01 0.25 0.011 0.008 0.058 0.0021 0.155* -- 0.0003 X 1.23* 2.44 1 Comparative Example363738394041424344454748__________________________________________________________________________ Asterisk "*" indicates the results out of the scope of the present invention Mark ".largecircle." means plating and mark "X" means not plating.
Example 2 (in the case of Mn: 0.5 to 2.5 wt. %; P: 0.02 to 0.100 wt. % and the grain size: to be limited)
Example 2-1
Steel having a composition shown in Table 9 was hot-rolled into a hot-rolled steel sheet in a thickness of 4.0 mm and then coiled at 620.degree. C. The hot-rolled steel sheet was acid-pickled and then cold-rolled into a cold-rolled steel sheet in a thickness of 0.8 mm. The steel sheet was continuously annealed at 850.degree. C. and then galvanized in a coating weight of 45 g/m.sup.2 per surface. Then, the steel was galvannealed at 510.degree. C. The steel sheet was temper-rolled with a reduction ratio of 0.7% to obtain a final product. The press formability of the steel sheet was evaluated in such a manner that a tensile test piece was extracted from the product (a test piece conforming to JIS-#5) to measure the r-value. The r-value was evaluated in such a manner that those in directions of angles of 0 degree, 45 degrees and 90 degrees with regard to the rolling direction were measured and the following equation is employed to perform evaluation as mean r-value (rmean). The surface appearance of the steel sheet was evaluated in the before-mentioned five grades.
rmean=1/4(r0+2r45+r90)
Results are shown in FIG. 9. Although B is very effective to improve the surface appearance if it is added with a concentration of 1 ppm or more, rmean deteriorates remarkably if B is added with a concentration of 20 ppm.
TABLE 9__________________________________________________________________________C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti B__________________________________________________________________________.ltoreq.0.0030 .ltoreq.0.02 0.6 to 0.7 0.045 to 0.055 0.005 to 0.010 0.04 to 0.06 .ltoreq.0.0030 0.05 to 0.06 0 to 0.0025__________________________________________________________________________ (wt %)
Example 2-2
Steel samples having compositions shown in Tables 10, 11 and 12 were melted to form a slab and then the slab was hot-rolled in an ordinary manner into hot-rolled steel sheets. The hot-rolled steel sheets were acid-pickled in a usual way and then cold-rolled into a cold-rolled steel sheet in thickness of 0.7 mm. Then, the steel samples were continuously annealed at 770 to 880.degree. C. and then galvanized in a coating weight of 60 g/m.sup.2 per surface. Then, the samples were galvannealed at 470 to 550.degree. C. and then temper-rolled with a reduction ratio of 0.7%. Some of the samples were applied with Fe--Zn plating to the surface of the Zn-coating layer thereof to obtain a product. The surface appearance of each of the products was evaluated in the before-mentioned five grades. Then, tensile test pieces taken from the products were subjected to mechanical tests. The rmean was measured by the before-mentioned method. The R value also was measured by the before-mentioned method. Results are shown in Tables 10, 11 and 12.
The steel samples of the present invention resulted in steel sheets having satisfactory rmean and surface appearance being obtained. Comparative Examples 22 and 24 resulted in low rmean because of large contents of C and Mn therein. Since Comparative Example 25 contained P in a large quantity, rmean and surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 23 contained Si in a large quantity, its surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 26 contained Mb in a large quantity, rmean was too small. Since Comparative Example 27 contained B in a large quantity, r deteriorated. Since Comparative Examples 28 and 29 resulted in rmean being out of the scope of the present invention, surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 30 contained Ti in a large quantity, Rmean was out of the scope of the present invention and surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 31 contained Nb in a large quantity, rmean deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 32 contained Ti in a large quantity, Rmean was out of the scope of the present invention and surface appearance deteriorated.
TABLE 10__________________________________________________________________________Sam- Plating Evalua-ple for tion ofSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %) Upper R r TS Appear-No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B Layer mean mean (MPa) ance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________1 0.0020 0.02 0.65 0.043 0.008 0.056 0.0021 0.068 0.011 -- X 0.92 1.92 346 5 Example2 0.0021 0.01 0.67 0.046 0.010 0.049 0.0023 0.069 -- -- X 1.02 1.89 347 5 Example3 0.0018 0.02 0.71 0.050 0.011 0.055 0.0020 0.072 -- 0.0004 .largecircle. 1.03 1.90 349 5 Example4 0.0025 0.02 0.66 0.022 0.006 0.071 0.0019 0.023 -- -- .largecircle. 0.98 1.89 344 5 Example5 0.0028 0.02 0.59 0.071 0.009 0.048 0.0023 0.079 0.010 -- X 0.99 1.93 420 5 Example6 0.0026 0.04 0.52 0.093 0.011 0.056 0.0024 0.092 -- 0.0006 X 1.01 1.82 460 5 Example7 0.0021 0.01 0.63 0.040 0.007 0.060 0.0022 0.140 -- 0.0006 X 0.91 2.01 344 5 Example8 0.0032 0.03 1.01 0.025 0.006 0.049 0.0026 0.066 -- 0.0005 .largecircle. 1.01 1.91 362 5 Example9 0.0019 0.02 1.05 0.030 0.007 0.055 0.0021 0.045 0.009 -- X 1.02 1.93 365 5 Example10 0.0016 0.02 1.26 0.035 0.009 0.048 0.0019 0,044 0.009 0.0007 X 1.00 1.89 408 5 Example11 0.0020 0.02 1.54 0.026 0.010 0.059 0.0020 0.050 -- -- .largecircle. 1.05 1.92 430 5 Example12 0.0021 0.01 1.89 0.042 0.007 0.063 0.0026 0.077 0.012 -- X 1.01 1.82 440 5 Example13 0.0022 0.01 2.28 0.023 0.009 0.058 0.0021 0.068 -- -- X 1.03 1.83 469 5 Example14 0.0023 0.01 1.21 0.060 0.007 0.065 0.0019 0.052 -- 0.0006 .largecircle. 1.65 1.93 412 5 Example15 0.0023 0.02 2.10 0.030 0.007 0.065 0.0021 0.079 -- 0.0005 X 1.01 1.82 454 5 Example16 0.0024 0.02 0.65 0.048 0.012 0.066 0.0019 0.025 -- 0.0007 .largecircle. 1.03 1.99 347 5 Example__________________________________________________________________________ Mark ".largecircle." means plating and mark "X" means not plating.
TABLE 11__________________________________________________________________________Sam- Plating Evalua-ple for tion ofSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %) Upper R r TS Appear-No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B Layer mean mean (MPa) ance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________17 0.0022 0.03 0.67 0.039 0.009 0.072 0.0022 0.045 -- 0.0006 X 1.05 1.93 345 5 Example18 0.0025 0.04 0.66 0.040 0.008 0.063 0.0021 0.044 -- 0.0015 X 1.03 1.82 371 5 Example19 0.0022 0.02 0.55 0.033 0.007 0.065 0.0022 0.065 -- 0.0013 .largecircle. 1.09 1.84 358 5 Example20 0.0023 0.01 0.57 0.041 0.009 0.070 0.0021 0.088 -- -- .largecircle. 0.98 1.99 347 5 Example21 0.0021 0.01 0.58 0.035 0.009 0.054 0.0022 0.121 -- -- .largecircle. 0.99 2.05 346 5 Example__________________________________________________________________________ Mark ".largecircle." means plating and mark "X" means not plating.
TABLE 12__________________________________________________________________________Sam- Plating Evalua-ple for tion ofSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %) Upper R r TS Appear-No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B Layer mean mean (MPa) ance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________22 0.0037* 0.02 0.66 0.025 0.014 0.056 0.0028 0.033 -- -- X 1.01 1.70 364 5 Com- parative Example23 0.0021 0.08* 0.88 0.033 0.009 0.060 0.0021 0.042 -- 0.0005 X 1.00 1.85 358 3 Com- parative Example24 0.0020 0.03 2.59* 0.028 0.008 0.055 0.0026 0.044 0.013 -- X 1.02 1.65 472 5 Com- parative Example25 0.0022 0.01 0.75 0.110* 0.009 0.061 0.0021 0.032 0.011 0.0006 X 0.79* 1.60 478 1 Com- parative Example26 0.0019 0.02 0.82 0.040 0.006 0.070 0.0020 0.042 0.023* -- X 1.01 1.69 372 5 Com- parative Example27 0.0018 0.02 0.65 0.033 0.013 0.048 0.0022 0.044 -- 0.0023* X 1.02 1.59 373 5 Com- parative Example28 0.0024 0.03 0.77 0.095 0.012 0.052 0.0021 0.028 -- -- .largecircle. 1.12* 1.81 456 4 Com- parative Example29 0.0023 0.01 0.66 0.044 0.010 0.055 0.0028 0.148 -- -- X 0.81* 1.93 344 1 Com- parative Example30 0.0021 0.02 0.67 0.028 0.010 0.065 0.0022 0.156* -- -- .largecircle. 0.88* 2.08 336 2 Com- parative Example31 0.0022 0.03 0.66 0.038 0.009 0.066 0.0020 0.009* -- -- X 0.98 1.73 352 5 Com- parative Example__________________________________________________________________________ Asterisk "*" indicates the results out of the scope of the present invention Mark ".largecircle." means plating and mark "X" means not plating.
Example 3 (in the case of Mn: less than 0.5 wt. %; P: less than 0.02 wt. % and the texture: to be limited)
Example 3
Steel samples having compositions shown in Tables 13, 14 and 15 (same as those shown in Tables 6, 7 and 8) were melted to form a slab and then the slab was hot-rolled in an ordinary manner to produce hot-rolled sheets. The hot-rolled steel sheets were acid-pickled in a usual method and then cold-rolled into cold-rolled steel sheets in thickness of 0.7 mm. Then, the steel samples were continuously annealed at 770 to 880.degree. C. on a continuous galvannealing line and then galvannealed in a coating weight of 60 g/m.sup.2 per surface. Then, the samples were galvannealed at 470 to 550.degree. C. and then temper-rolled with a reduction ratio of 0.7%. Some of the samples were applied with Fe--Zn plating to the surface of the Zn-coating layer thereof to obtain a final product. The surface appearance of each of the products was evaluated in the five grades before-mentioned. Then, tensile test pieces taken from the products were subjected to mechanical tests. The man was measured by the before-mentioned method. The Rmean also was measured by the before-mentioned method. Results were shown in Table 13.
The steel samples of the present invention resulted in steel sheets having satisfactory rmean and surface appearance being obtained. Since Comparative Examples 25, 27 and 28 contained C, Mn and P in large quantities, rmean was too small. Since Comparative Example 26 contained Si in a large quantity, surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 29 contained Ti in a small quantity, rmean was too small. Since Comparative Example 30 contained B in a large quantity, rmean deteriorated. Since Comparative Examples 31, 32 and 33 made Rmean out of the scope of the present invention, surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 34 contained N in a large quantity, rmean deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 35 contained Ti in a large quantity, surface appearance deteriorated.
TABLE 13__________________________________________________________________________ PlatingSample for EvaluationSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %) Upper R r of Ap-No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B Layer mean mean pearance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________1 0.0020 0.02 0.33 0.008 0.008 0.056 0.0021 0.046 -- -- X 1.23 2.24 5 Example2 0.0621 0.01 0.41 0.007 0.010 0.049 0.0023 0.065 -- -- X 1.36 2.26 5 Example3 0.0018 0.02 0.32 0.009 0.011 0.055 0.0020 0.089 -- -- .largecircle. 1.50 2.40 5 Example4 0.0021 0.03 0.28 0.009 0.009 0.048 0.0021 0.021 -- 0.0003 X 1.08 2.05 5 Example5 0.0022 0.01 0.25 0.008 0.007 0.061 0.0022 0.051 -- 0.0005 .largecircle. 1.05 2.06 5 Example6 0.0025 0.02 0.29 0.015 0.006 0.071 0.0019 0.086 -- 0.0004 X 0.98 2.02 5 Example7 0.0028 0.02 0.14 0.018 0.009 0.048 0.0023 0.037 -- -- X 1.37 2.21 5 Example8 0.0026 0.04 0.16 0.011 0.011 0.056 0.0024 0.058 -- -- X 1.55 2.18 5 Example9 0.0021 0.01 0.22 0.003 0.007 0.060 0.0022 0.096 -- -- X 1.89 2.10 5 Example10 0.0032 0.03 0.26 0.012 0.006 0.049 0.0026 0.044 -- 0.0009 .largecircle. 1.12 2.03 5 Example11 0.0019 0.02 0.33 0.004 0.007 0.055 0.0021 0.060 -- 0.0017 X 0.89 2.02 5 Example12 0.0016 0.02 0.21 0.015 0.009 0.048 0.0019 0.058 -- 0.0070 X 0.99 2.15 5 Example13 0.0020 0.02 0.25 0.013 0.010 0.059 0.0020 0.122 -- 0.0007 .largecircle. 0.53 2.43 5 Example14 0.0021 0.01 0.26 0.009 0.007 0.063 0.0026 0.108 -- 0.0005 X 1.67 2.39 5 Example15 0.0022 0.01 0.25 0.011 0.009 0.058 0.0021 0.095 0.009 0.0003 X 1.44 2.35 5 Example16 0.0023 0.01 0.28 0.016 0.007 0.065 0.0019 0.088 0.012 0.0004 .largecircle. 1.36 2.20 5 Example__________________________________________________________________________ Asterisk "*" indicates the results out of the scope of the present invention Mark ".largecircle." means plating and mark "X" means not plating.
TABLE 14__________________________________________________________________________ PlatingSample for EvaluationSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %) Upper R r of Ap-No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B Layer mean mean pearance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________17 0.0022 0.03 0.30 0.011 0.008 0.070 0.0022 0.075 0.015 -- X 1.57 2.01 5 Example18 0.0023 0.02 0.44 0.017 0.007 0.065 0.0021 0.025 0.008 -- X 1.00 2.02 5 Example19 0.0024 0.02 0.25 0.013 0.012 0.066 0.0019 0.044 0.009 -- .largecircle. 0.98 2.11 5 Example20 0.0022 0.03 0.19 0.011 0.009 0.072 0.0022 0.045 0.007 0.0003 X 1.02 2.08 5 Example21 0.0025 0.04 0.22 0.013 0.008 0.063 0.0021 0.072 0.015 0.0005 X 1.38 2.07 5 Example22 0.0022 0.02 0.31 0.014 0.007 0.065 0.0022 0.140 -- 0.0008 .largecircle. 1.76 2.40 5 Example23 0.0023 0.01 0.25 0.017 0.009 0.070 0.0021 0.065 0.016 -- .largecircle. 1.09 2.20 5 Example24 0.0021 0.01 0.28 0.016 0.009 0.054 0.0022 0.138 -- 0.0006 X 0.88 2.40 5 Example25 0.0037* 0.02 0.17 0.009 0.014 0.056 0.0028 0.045 -- -- X 1.38 1.77 5 Comparative Example26 0.0021 0.08* 0.16 0.010 0.009 0.060 0.0021 0.061 -- -- X 1.26 2.21 3 Comparative Example27 0.0020 0.03 0.53* 0.008 0.008 0.055 0.0026 0.033 -- -- X 0.99 1.83 5 Comparative Example28 0.0022 0.01 0.22 0.023* 0.009 0.061 0.0021 0.081 -- -- X 1.70 1.85 5 Comparative Example29 0.0019 0.02 0.26 0.007 0.006 0.070 0.0020 0.003* -- -- X 1.05 1.71 5 Comparative Example30 0.0018 0.02 0.28 0.009 0.013 0.043 0.0022 0.693 -- 0.0024* X 1.01 1.65 5 Comparative Example31 0.0024 0.03 0.31 0.006 0.012 0.052 0.0021 0.085 -- -- .largecircle. 2.05* 2.01 4 Comparative Example32 0.0023 0.01 0.46 0.007 0.010 0.055 0.0028 0.099 -- -- X 0.04* 2.25 2 Comparative Example__________________________________________________________________________ Asterisk "*" indicates the results out of the scope of the present invention Mark ".largecircle." means plating and mark "X" means not plating.
TABLE 15__________________________________________________________________________ PlatingSample for EvaluationSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %) Upper R r of Ap-No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B Layer mean mean pearance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________33 0.0021 0.02 0.25 0.007 0.010 0.065 0.0022 0.095 -- -- .largecircle. 2.23* 2.40 1 Comparative34 0.0022 0.03 0.26 0.015 0.009 0.066 0.0020 0.078 0.022* -- X 1.12 1.88 5 Comparative Example35 0.0023 0.01 0.25 0.011 0.008 0.058 0.0021 0.155* -- 0.0003 X 2.21* 2.44 1 Comparative Example363738394041424344454748__________________________________________________________________________ Asterisk "*" indicates the results out of the scope of the present invention Mark ".largecircle." means plating and mark "X" means not plating.
Example 4 (in the case of Mn: 0.5 to 2.5 wt. %; P: 0.02 to 0.100 wt. % and the texture: to be limited)
Steel samples having compositions shown in Tables 16, 17 and 18 (same as those shown in Tables 10, 11 and 12) were melted to form a slab and then the slab was hot-rolled in an ordinary manner into hot-rolled sheets. The hot-rolled steel sheets were acid-pickled in a usual way and then cold-rolled into cold-rolled steel sheets in thickness of 0.7 mm. Then, the steel samples were continuously annealed at 770 to 880.degree. C. and then galvanized in a coating weight of 60 g/m.sup.2 per surface. Then, the samples were galvannealed at 470 to 550.degree. C. and then temper-rolled with with a reduction ratio of 0.7%. A portion of the samples was applied with Fe--Zn plating to the surface of the coating layer thereof to obtain a final product. The surface appearance of each of the obtained products was evaluated by the five grade system before-mentioned. Then, tensile test pieces taken from the products were subjected to mechanical tests. The rmean was measured by the before-mentioned method. The rmean also was measured by the before-mentioned method. The results are shown in Tables 16, 17 and 18.
The steel samples of the present invention resulted in steel sheets having satisfactory rmean and surface appearance being obtained. Since Comparative Examples 22 and 24 contained C and M in large quantities, rmean was too small. Since Comparative Example 25 contained P in a large quantity, surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 23 contained Si in a large quantity, surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 26 contained Nb in a large quantity, rmean was too small. Since Comparative Example 27 contained B in a large quantity, rmean deteriorated. Since Comparative Examples 28, 29 and 30 attained Rmean out of the scope of the present invention, surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 31 contained Ti in a small quantity, rmean deteriorated.
TABLE 16__________________________________________________________________________Sam- Plating Evalua-ple for tion ofSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %) Upper R r TS Appear-No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B Layer mean mean (MPa) ance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________1 0.0020 0.02 0.65 0.043 0.008 0.056 0.0021 0.068 0.011 -- X 1.09 1.92 346 5 Example2 0.0021 0.01 0.67 0.046 0.010 0.049 0.0023 0.069 -- -- X 1.23 1.89 347 5 Example3 0.0018 0.02 0.71 0.050 0.011 0.055 0.0020 0.072 -- 0.0004 .largecircle. 1.35 1.90 349 5 Example4 0.0025 0.02 0.66 0.022 0.006 0.071 0.0019 0.023 -- -- .largecircle. 0.77 1.89 344 5 Example5 0.0028 0.02 0.59 0.071 0.009 0.048 0.0023 0.079 0.010 -- X 1.05 1.93 420 5 Example6 0.0026 0.04 0.52 0.093 0.011 0.056 0.0024 0.092 -- 0.0006 X 1.88 1.82 460 5 Example7 0.0021 0.01 0.63 0.040 0.007 0.060 0.0022 0.140 -- 0.0006 X 1.92 2.01 344 5 Example3 0.0032 0.03 1.01 0.025 0.006 0.049 0.0026 0.066 -- 0.0005 .largecircle. 1.07 1.91 362 5 Example9 0.0019 0.02 1.05 0.030 0.007 0.055 0.0021 0.045 0.009 -- X 1.01 1.93 365 5 Example10 0.0016 0.02 1.26 0.035 0.009 0.048 0.0019 0,044 0.009 0.0007 X 0.96 1.89 408 5 Example11 0.0020 0.02 1.54 0.026 0.010 0.059 0.0020 0.050 -- -- .largecircle. 0.53 1.92 430 5 Example12 0.0021 0.01 1.89 0.042 0.007 0.063 0.0026 0.077 0.012 -- X 1.36 1.82 440 5 Example13 0.0022 0.01 2.28 0.023 0.009 0.058 0.0021 0.068 -- -- X 1.45 1.83 469 5 Example14 0.0023 0.01 1.21 0.060 0.007 0.065 0.0019 0.052 -- 0.0006 .largecircle. 1.46 1.93 412 5 Example15 0.0023 0.02 2.10 0.030 0.007 0.065 0.0021 0.079 -- 0.0005 X 1.05 1.82 454 5 Example16 0.0024 0.02 0.65 0.048 0.012 0.066 0.0019 0.025 -- 0.0007 .largecircle. 1.09 1.99 347 5 Example__________________________________________________________________________ Mark ".largecircle." means plating and mark "X" means not plating.
TABLE 17__________________________________________________________________________Sam- Plating Evalua-ple for tion ofSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %) Upper R r TS Appear-No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B Layer mean mean (MPa) ance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________17 0.0022 0.03 0.67 0.039 0.009 0.072 0.0022 0.045 -- 0.0006 X 1.25 1.93 345 5 Example18 0.0025 0.04 0.66 0.040 0.008 0.063 0.0021 0.044 -- 0.0015 X 1.05 1.82 371 5 Example19 0.0022 0.02 0.55 0.033 0.007 0.065 0.0022 0.065 -- 0.0013 .largecircle. 1.06 1.84 358 5 Example20 0.0023 0.01 0.57 0.041 0.009 0.070 0.0021 0.088 -- -- .largecircle. 1.22 1.99 347 5 Example21 0.0021 0.01 0.58 0.035 0.009 0.054 0.0022 0.121 -- -- X 1.39 2.05 346 5 Example__________________________________________________________________________ Mark ".largecircle." means plating and mark "X" means not plating.
TABLE 18__________________________________________________________________________Sam- Plating Evalua-ple for tion ofSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %) Upper R r TS Appear-No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B Layer mean mean (MPa) ance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________22 0.0037* 0.02 0.66 0.025 0.014 0.056 0.0028 0.033 -- -- X 1.25 1.70 364 5 Com- parative Example23 0.0021 0.08* 0.88 0.033 0.009 0.060 0.0021 0.042 -- 0.0005 X 1.18 1.85 358 3 Com- parative Example24 0.0020 0.03 2.59* 0.028 0.008 0.055 0.0026 0.044 0.013 -- X 1.29 1.65 472 5 Com- parative Example25 0.0022 0.01 0.75 0.110* 0.009 0.061 0.0021 0.032 0.011 0.0006 X 2.09* 1.60 478 1 Com- parative Example26 0.0019 0.02 0.82 0.040 0.006 0.070 0.0020 0.042 0.023* -- X 1.13 1.69 372 5 Com- parative Example27 0.0018 0.02 0.65 0.033 0.013 0.048 0.0022 0.044 -- 0.0023* X 1.05 1.59 373 5 Com- parative Example28 0.0024 0.03 0.77 0.095 0.012 0.052 0.0021 0.028 -- -- .largecircle. 0.45* 1.81 456 4 Com- parative Example29 0.0023 0.01 0.66 0.044 0.010 0.055 0.0028 0.148 -- -- X 2.09* 1.93 344 2 Com- parative Example30 0.0021 0.02 0.67 0.028 0.010 0.065 0.0022 0.156* -- -- .largecircle. 2.25* 2.08 336 1 Com- parative Example31 0.0022 0.03 0.66 0.038 0.009 0.066 0.0020 0.009* -- -- X 1.11 1.73 352 5 Com- parative Example__________________________________________________________________________ Asterisk "*" indicates the results out of the scope of the present invention Mark ".largecircle." means plating and mark "X" means not plating.
Example 5 (in the case of Mn: less than 0.5 wt. %; P: less than 0.02 wt. % and the soaking temperature: to be controlled)
Example 5-1
Steel samples having compositions shown in Table 19 were melted to form slabs and then the slabs were soaked at 1180.degree. C. for 60 minutes, followed by being hot-rolled into hot-rolled steel sheets in thickness of 3.6 mm. Then, the hot-rolled steel sheets were coiled at 640.degree. C. The hot-rolled steel sheets were acid-pickled and then cold-rolled into cold-rolled steel sheets in thickness of 0.7 mm. Then, the cold-rolled steel sheets were continuously annealed at 850.degree. C. and then immediately galvanized in a coating weight of 60 g/m.sup.2 per surface. Then, the samples were galvannealed at 500.degree. C. and then temper-rolled with a reduction ratio of 0.7% to obtain final products. The surface appearance of each of the products was evaluated in accordance with the foregoing criteria. Then, test pieces conforming to JIS-#5 were extracted from the product to measure r-value (deep drawability). Results were shown in FIG. 9. When the samples satisfied the scope of the present invention, steel sheets having excellent surface appearance and deep drawability were obtained.
TABLE 19______________________________________ sol.C Si Mn P S Al N Ti B______________________________________0.0019 0.01 0.15 0.015 0.006 0.048 0.0019 0.0944 0to to to to to to to to to0.0022 0.02 0.18 0.017 0.009 0.055 0.0024 0.101 0.0025(wt %)______________________________________
Example 5-2
Steel samples having compositions shown in Table 20 were melted to form slabs and then the slabs were soaked at 1180.degree. C. for 50 minutes, followed by being hot-rolled into hot-rolled steel sheets in thickness of 3.6 mm. Then, the hot-rolled steel sheets were coiled at 680.degree. C. The hot-rolled steel sheets were acid-pickled and then cold-rolled into cold-rolled steel sheets in thickness of 0.7 mm. Then, the cold-rolled steel sheets were continuously annealed at 850.degree. C. and then immediately galvanized in a coating weight of 60 g/m.sup.2 per surface. Then, the galvanized steel sheets were galvannealed at 420 to 630.degree. C. and then temper-rolled with a reduction ratio of 0.7% to form final products. The surface appearance of each of the products was evaluated in accordance with the foregoing criteria. The results were shown in FIG. 10. When the samples satisfied the scope of the present invention, steel sheets having excellent surface appearance were obtained.
TABLE 20__________________________________________________________________________C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti -615[% Ti] + 1160 -385[% Ti] + 1230__________________________________________________________________________0.0018 0.02 0.26 0.011 0.009 0.056 0.0021 0.064 1121 1205(wt %)__________________________________________________________________________
Example 5-3
Steel samples having compositions shown in Tables 21, 23 and 25 were melted to form slabs and then the slabs were soaked at 1180.degree. C. for 45 to 70 minutes, followed by being hot-rolled into hot-rolled steel sheets in thickness of 3.2 mm (Nos. 1 to 30 were examples of the present invention, Nos. 40 to 53 were comparative examples each having a composition out of the scope of the present invention and Nos. 54 to 59 were comparative examples, the manufacturing conditions of which were out of the scope of the present invention). The obtained hot-rolled steel sheets were acid-pickled and then cold-rolled into cold-rolled steel sheets in thickness of 0.8 mm. Then, the cold-rolled steel sheets were continuously annealed at 780 to 930.degree. C. and then immediately galvanized in a coating weight of 60 g/m.sup.2 per surface. The galvanized steel sheets were galvannealed at 440 to 610.degree. C. Then, the samples were temper-rolled at reduction ratios of 0.5 to 1.0%. The manufacturing conditions were shown in Tables 22, 24 and 26. Some of the products were applied with Fe--Zn alloy electroplating on the the Zn-coating layer. Test pieces conforming to JIS-#5 were taken from the products to perform tensile tests and the surface appearance of each sample was evaluated in accordance with the foregoing criteria. The results are collectively shown in Tables 22, 24 and 26. As can be understood from the foregoing tables, the present invention enables steel sheets having excellent surface appearance and formability to be manufactured. Since Comparative Examples 40, 42, 43 and 44 contained C, Mn, P and S, r-value of the steel sheets deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 41 contained Si in a large quantity, surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Examples 45 and 46 contained Al in a quantity out of the scope of the present invention, the r-value deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 47 contained N in a large quantity, the r-value deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 48 contained Ti in a small quantity, the r-value deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 49 contained Ti in a large quantity, surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Examples 50 and 52 contained Nb and B in small quantities, surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Examples 51 and 53 contained Nb and B in large quantities, the r-value deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 54 was heated at an excessively high temperature, surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Examples 55 and 56 were coiled at a temperature out of the scope of the present invention, the r-value deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 57 was annealed at a level higher than the Ar3 transformation temperature, the r-value deteriorated. Since Comparative Examples 58 and 59 were galvannealed a temperature out of the scope of the present invention, surface appearance deteriorated.
TABLE 21__________________________________________________________________________SampleSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %)No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B__________________________________________________________________________ 1 0.0012 0.01 0.21 0.012 0.006 0.054 0.0021 0.082 -- -- 2 0.0019 0.02 0.20 0.011 0.007 0.060 0.0022 0.086 -- -- 3 0.0026 0.01 0.22 0.014 0.007 0.060 0.0021 0.084 -- -- 4 0.0038 0.02 0.24 0.016 0.008 0.056 0.0022 0.079 -- -- 5 0.0021 0.04 0.26 0.015 0.009 0.066 0.0021 0.080 -- -- 6 0.0019 0.02 0.38 0.014 0.010 0.058 0.2022 0.082 -- -- 7 0.0019 0.02 0.14 0.011 0.008 0.059 0.0021 0.080 -- -- 8 0.0018 0.02 0.20 0.019 0.008 0.066 0.0019 0.082 -- -- 9 0.0017 0.02 0.21 0.003 0.009 0.054 0.0020 0.083 -- --10 0.0020 0.02 0.22 0.009 0.003 0.055 0.0021 0.084 -- --11 0.0019 0.01 0.20 0.011 0.008 0.092 0.0023 0.085 -- --12 0.0020 0.02 0.22 0.013 0.009 0.055 0.0022 0.023 -- --13 0.0022 0.01 0.24 0.011 0.027 0.060 0.0019 0.041 -- --14 0.0021 0.02 0.25 0.013 0.009 0.061 0.0020 0.068 -- --15 0.0023 0.01 0.21 0.011 0.007 0.058 0.0019 0.101 -- --16 0.0021 0.02 0.22 0.009 0.009 0.055 0.0021 0.148 -- --17 0.0022 0.01 0.21 0.008 0.010 0.056 0.0022 0.059 -- --18 0.0021 0.02 0.22 0.011 0.011 0.055 0.0019 0.062 -- --19 0.0022 0.02 0.24 0.009 0.007 0.058 0.0022 0.26420 0.0023 0.01 0.22 0.009 0.006 0.066 0.0021 0.055 -- --21 0.0022 0.02 0.23 0.016 0.011 0.058 0.0022 0.059 -- --22 0.0022 0.01 0.22 0.011 0.008 0.065 0.0019 0.054 -- --23 0.0021 0.01 0.24 0.009 0.007 0.048 0.0022 0.060 -- --__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 22__________________________________________________________________________Sample Temp. Coiling Annealing AlloyingSteel -615[Ti %] + -385[Ti %] + for Temp. Temp. Temp.No. 1160 1230 Heating (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) r Value Appearance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________ 1 1110 1198 1190 680 850 505 2.31 4 Example 2 1107 1197 1180 680 840 510 2.30 5 Example 3 1108 1198 1120 670 880 500 2.39 5 Example 4 1111 1120 1190 660 850 495 2.28 5 Example 5 1111 1199 1180 680 860 495 2.30 5 Example 6 1110 1198 1190 640 840 505 2.31 5 Example 7 1111 1199 1190 620 850 495 2.33 5 Example 8 1110 1198 1190 600 850 500 2.36 5 Example 9 1109 1198 1120 580 850 500 2.29 5 Example10 1108 1198 1150 680 850 500 2.28 5 Example11 1108 1197 1170 670 860 495 2.27 5 Example12 1146 1221 1200 640 870 590 2.01 5 Example13 1135 1214 1190 640 880 495 2.13 5 Example14 1118 1204 1190 650 850 500 2.25 5 Example15 1098 1191 1180 650 830 505 2.38 4 Example16 1069 1173 1170 660 830 515 2.42 4 Example17 1124 1207 1200 680 800 460 2.26 5 Example18 1122 1206 1180 510 810 495 2.28 5 Example19 1121 1205 1190 690 780 500 2.15 5 Example20 1126 1209 1190 680 810 505 2.10 5 Example21 1124 1207 1190 640 850 510 2.12 5 Example22 1127 1209 1190 630 850 515 2.13 5 Example23 1123 1207 1190 620 850 510 2.15 5 Example__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 23__________________________________________________________________________SampleSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %)No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B__________________________________________________________________________24 0.0020 0.02 0.24 0.016 0.007 0.054 0.0019 0.044 0.011 --25 0.0019 0.01 0.22 0.008 0.006 0.055 0.0020 0.046 0.006 --26 0.0020 0.02 0.23 0.009 0.009 0.060 0.0019 0.048 0.027 --27 0.0021 0.01 0.24 0.010 0.011 0.062 0.0022 0.043 -- 0.000328 0.0021 0.02 0.25 0.011 0.009 0.058 0.0021 0.044 -- 0.000729 0.0022 0.03 0.26 0.011 0.008 0.055 0.0019 0.052 -- 0.001330 0.0017 0.02 0.24 0.012 0.009 0.060 0.0020 0.055 -- 0.001931 0.0019 0.02 0.27 0.011 0.007 0.066 0.0019 0.038 0.009 0.000432 0.0020 0.01 0.24 0.009 0.009 0.049 0.0022 0.028 0.014 0.000733 0.0020 0.02 0.24 0.016 0.007 0.054 0.0019 0.044 0.010 --34 0.0019 0.01 0.22 0.008 0.006 0.055 0.0020 0.046 0.007 --35 0.0020 0.02 0.23 0.009 0.009 0.060 0.0019 0.048 0.014 --36 0.0021 0.01 0.24 0.010 0.011 0.062 0.0022 0.043 -- 0.000437 0.0021 0.02 0.25 0.011 0.009 0.058 0.0021 0.044 -- 0.000638 0.0022 0.03 0.26 0.011 0.008 0.055 0.0019 0.052 -- 0.001439 0.0017 0.02 0.24 0.012 0.009 0.060 0.0020 0.055 -- 0.001840 0.0042* 0.01 0.22 0.011 0.008 0.062 0.0017 0.044 -- --41 0.0022 0.07* 0.24 0.009 0.010 0.058 0.0021 0.048 -- --42 0.0021 0.02 0.53* 0.010 0.009 0.066 0.0022 0.065 -- --43 0.0018 0.01 0.26 0.022* 0.011 0.059 0.0018 0.055 -- --44 0.0020 0.02 0.26 0.015 0.016* 0.066 0.0017 0.038 -- --45 0.0017 0.01 0.24 0.0122 0.009 0.011* 0.0020 0.045 -- 0.0004__________________________________________________________________________ Asterisk "*" indicates the results out of the scope of the present invention
TABLE 24__________________________________________________________________________Sample Temp. Coiling Annealing AlloyingSteel -615[Ti %] + -385[Ti %] + for Temp. Temp. Temp.No. 1160 1230 Heating (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) r Value Appearance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________24 1133 1213 1190 640 850 510 2.21 5 Example25 1132 1212 1160 640 840 500 2.25 5 Example26 1130 1212 1190 680 850 500 2.20 5 Example27 1134 1213 1190 680 850 515 2.21 5 Example28 1133 1213 1190 640 880 500 2.19 5 Example29 1128 1210 1200 620 870 500 2.07 5 Example30 1126 1209 1180 680 860 500 1.99 5 Example31 1137 1215 1170 690 850 515 1.98 5 Example32 1142 1219 1160 680 850 500 1.99 5 Example33 1133 1213 1190 640 860 505 2.23 5 Example34 1132 1212 1190 620 860 520 2.20 5 Example35 1130 1212 1190 600 870 505 2.25 5 Example36 1134 1213 1200 620 880 510 2.20 5 Example37 1133 1213 1200 640 890 495 2.18 5 Example38 1128 1210 1200 680 890 490 2.15 5 Example39 1126 1209 1190 620 880 495 2.10 5 Example40 1133 1213 1200 600 870 500 1.76 5 Comparative Example41 1130 1212 1180 680 850 515 1.80 3 Comparative Example42 1120 1205 1190 590 850 510 1.75 5 Comparative Example43 1126 1209 1180 620 850 505 1.79 4 Comparative Example44 1137 1215 1190 640 860 500 1.77 3 Comparative Example45 1132 1213 1190 640 870 505 1.65 5 Comparative Example__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 25__________________________________________________________________________SampleSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %)No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B__________________________________________________________________________46 0.0015 0.02 0.22 0.011 0.001 0.104* 0.0022 0.048 0.012 --47 0.0018 0.01 0.24 0.010 0.009 0.056 0.0042* 0.032 -- --48 0.0016 0.02 0.24 0.009 0.012 0.066 0.0023 0.018* -- --49 0.0020 0.01 0.23 0.008 0.010 0.057 0.0021 0.152* -- --50 0.0021 0.02 0.24 0.010 0.010 0.048 0.0020 0.043 0.004* --51 0.0019 0.01 0.22 0.007 0.007 0.050 0.0017 0.039 0.033* --52 0.0020 0.03 0.21 0.011 0.007 1.054 0.0019 0.032 -- 0.0001*53 0.0016 0.01 0.36 0.014 0.009 0.053 0.0020 0.048 -- 0.0022*54 0.0018 0.02 0.33 0.015 0.007 0.055 0.0021 0.045 -- --55 0.0016 0.02 0.24 0.011 0.007 0.058 0.0020 0.099 -- --56 0.0020 0.02 0.22 0.012 0.009 0.056 0.0019 0.101 -- --57 0.0021 0.02 0.21 0.009 0.001 0.058 0.0021 0.145 -- --58 0.0022 0.01 0.03 0.015 0.009 0.054 0.0023 0.089 -- --59 0.0019 0.01 0.34 0.012 0.009 0.049 0.0019 0.105 -- 0.0004__________________________________________________________________________ Asterisk "*" indicates the results out of the scope of the present invention
TABLE 26__________________________________________________________________________Sample Temp. Coiling Annealing AlloyingSteel -615[Ti %] + -385[Ti %] + for Temp. Temp. Temp.No. 1160 1230 Heating (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) r Value Appearance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________46 1130 1212 1200 680 850 505 1.76 4 Comparative Example47 1140 1218 1190 640 850 510 1.65 5 Comparative Example48 1149 1223 1190 620 850 500 1.50 5 Comparative Example49 1067 1171 1170 630 850 500 2.40 1 Comparative Example50 1134 1213 1190 650 850 505 2.21 3 Comparative Example51 1136 1215 1200 660 850 510 1.75 5 Comparative Example52 1140 1218 1200 680 860 510 2.10 3 Comparative Example53 1130 1212 1200 640 870 510 1.85 5 Comparative Example54 1132 1213 1220* 640 880 505 2.21 1 Comparative Example55 1099 1192 1190 710* 850 495 1.76 4 Comparative Example56 1098 1191 1190 480* 850 490 1.63 4 Comparative Example57 1071 1174 1170 640 930* 490 1.43 4 Comparative Example58 1105 1196 1190 640 850 440* 2.40 1 Comparative Example59 1095 1190 1180 620 860 610* 2.39 2 Comparative Example__________________________________________________________________________ Asterisk "*" indicates the results out of the scope of the present invention
Example 6 (in the case of Mn: 0.5 to 2.5 wt. %; P: 0.02 to 0.100 wt. % and the soaking temperature: to be controlled)
Example 6-1
Steel samples having compositions shown in Table 27 were melted to form slabs and then the slabs were soaked at 1180.degree. C. for 50 minutes, followed by being hot-rolled into hot-rolled steel sheets in thickness of 3.6 mm. Then, the hot-rolled steel sheets were coiled at 640.degree. C. The hot-rolled steel sheets were acid-pickled and then cold-rolled into cold-rolled steel sheets in thickness of 0.7 mm. Then, the cold-rolled steel sheets were continuously annealed at 850.degree. C. and then immediately galvanized in a coating weight of 60 g/m.sup.2 per surface. Then, the samples were galvannealed at 500.degree. C. and then temper-rolled with a reduction ratio of 0.7% to obtain final products. The surface appearance of each of the obtained products was evaluated in accordance with the foregoing criteria. Test pieces conforming to JIS-#5 were extracted from the products to measure the r-value. The results were shown in FIG. 11. When the samples satisfied the scope of the present invention, steel sheets having excellent surface appearance and deep drawability were obtained.
TABLE 27______________________________________C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti B______________________________________0.0018 0.01 0.85 0.041 0.007 0.049 0.0017 0.041 0to to to to to to to to to0.0023 0.03 0.91 0.046 0.009 0.055 0.0021 0.047 0.0025(wt %)______________________________________
Example 6-2
Steel samples having compositions shown in Table 28 were melted to form slabs and then the slabs were soaked at 1190.degree. C. for 40 minutes, followed by being hot-rolled into hot-rolled steel sheets in thickness of 3.2 mm. Then, the hot-rolled steel sheets were coiled at 680.degree. C. The hot-rolled steel sheets were acid-washed and then cold-rolled into cold-rolled steel sheets in thickness of 0.8 mm. Then, the cold-rolled steel sheets were continuously annealed at 840.degree. C. and then immediately galvanized in a coating weight of 60 g/m.sup.2 per surface. Then, the galvanized steel sheets were galvannealed at 420 to 630.degree. C. and then temper-rolled with a reduction ratio of 0.7% to form final products. The surface appearance of each of the obtained products was evaluated in accordance with the foregoing criteria. Results were shown in FIG. 12. When the samples satisfied the scope of the present invention, steel sheets having excellent surface appearance were obtained.
TABLE 28__________________________________________________________________________C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti -400[% Ti] + [% P] + 1250__________________________________________________________________________0.0019 0.02 0.77 0.045 0.009 0.056 0.0022 0.049 1212(wt %)__________________________________________________________________________
Example 6-3
Steel samples having compositions shown in Tables 29, 31 and 33 were melted to form slabs and the slabs were heated at a predetermined temperature, followed by being hot-rolled into hot-rolled steel sheets in thickness of 3.2 m. The hot-rolled steel sheets were acid-pickled and then cold-rolled into cold-rolled steel sheets in thickness of 0.8 mm. Then, the cold-rolled steel sheets were continuously annealed at 780 to 930.degree. C. and then immediately galvanized in a coating weight of 60 g/m.sup.2 per surface. Then, the galvanized steel sheets were galvannealed at 440 to 610.degree. C. Then, the galvanealed steel sheets were temper-rolled at reduction ratios of 0.5 to 1.0% to form final products. The manufacturing conditions were shown in Tables 30, 32 and 34. Some of the products were applied with Fe--Zn alloy electroplating on the Zn-coating layer. Test pieces conforming to JIS-#5 were extracted from the obtained products to perform tensile tests and the surface appearance of each sample was evaluated in accordance with the foregoing criteria. The results were collectively shown in Tables 30, 32 and 34. As can be understood from the results, the present invention (Nos. 1 to 39) enabled steel sheets having excellent surface appearance and formability to be manufactured. Since Comparative Examples 40, 43 and 45 contained C, Mn and P in large quantities, the r value of the structure deteriorated. Since Comparative Examples 42 and 44 contained Mn and P in small quantities, the strength deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 41 contained Si in a large quantity, surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 46 contained Al in a quantity out of the scope of the present invention, the r-value deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 47 contained N in a large quantity, the r-value deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 48 contained Ti in a small quantity, the r-value deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 49 contained Ti in a large quantity, surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Examples 50 and 52 contained Nb and B in small quantities, surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Examples 51 and 53 contained Nb and B in large quantities, the r-value deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 54 was heated at excessive high temperature, surface appearance deteriorated. Since Comparative Examples 55 and 56 was coiled at temperature out of the scope of the present invention, the r-value deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 57 was annealed at a level of more than the Ar3 transformation temperature, r-value deteriorated. Since Comparative Examples 58 and 59 were alloyed at a temperature out of the scope of the present invention, surface appearance deteriorated.
Although the invention has been described in its preferred form with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the present disclosure of the preferred form can be changed in the details of construction and in the combination and arrangement of parts without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention as hereinafter claimed.
TABLE 29__________________________________________________________________________SampleSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %)No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B__________________________________________________________________________ 1 0.1012 0.01 0.71 0.044 0.006 0.054 0.0021 0.041 -- -- 2 1.0019 0.02 0.65 0.039 0.007 0.060 0.0022 0.042 -- -- 3 0.0026 0.01 0.77 0.042 0.007 0.060 0.0021 0.043 -- -- 4 0.0038 0.02 0.62 0.041 0.008 0.056 0.0022 0.044 -- -- 5 0.0021 0.04 0.64 0.043 0.009 0.066 0.0021 0.045 -- -- 6 0.0019 0.02 0.82 0.044 0.010 0.058 0.0022 0.041 -- -- 7 0.0019 0.02 1.14 0.032 0.008 0.059 0.0021 0.044 -- -- 8 0.0018 0.02 1.56 0.034 0.008 0.066 0.0019 0.049 -- -- 9 0.0017 0.02 1.89 0.029 0.009 0.054 0.0020 0.029 -- --10 0.0020 0.02 2.01 0.042 0.003 0.055 0.0021 0.038 -- --11 0.0019 0.01 2.47 0.041 0.008 0.062 0.0023 0.048 -- --12 0.0020 0.02 0.74 0.066 0.009 0.055 0.0022 0.047 -- --13 0.0022 0.01 0.65 0.094 0.007 0.060 0.0019 0.041 -- --14 0.0021 0.02 0.76 0.038 0.012 0.061 0.0020 0.068 -- --15 0.0023 0.01 0.84 0.044 0.007 0.089 0.0019 0.065 -- --16 0.0021 0.02 0.80 0.038 0.009 0.055 0.0021 0.088 -- --17 0.0022 0.01 0.77 0.043 0.010 0.056 0.0022 0.101 -- --18 0.0021 0.02 0.66 0.048 0.011 0.055 0.0019 0.147 -- --19 0.1022 0.02 0.70 0.045 0.007 0.058 0.0022 0.064 -- --20 0.0023 0.01 0.57 0.033 0.006 0.066 0.0021 0.047 -- --21 0.0022 0.02 0.66 0.029 0.011 0.058 0.0022 0.059 -- --22 0.0022 0.01 0.89 0.044 0.008 0.065 0.0019 0.047 -- --23 0.0021 0.01 0.77 0.050 0.007 0.048 0.0022 0.060 -- --__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 30__________________________________________________________________________Sample -400 Temp. Coiling Annealing AlloyingSteel ([Ti %] + [P%]) + for Temp. Temp. Temp. TSNo. 1250 Heating (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) (MPa) r Value Appearance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________ 1 1216 1190 680 850 505 343 2.10 5 Example 2 1218 1180 680 840 510 345 2.05 5 Example 3 12l6 1120 670 880 500 347 2.02 5 Example 4 1216 1190 660 850 495 344 1.99 5 Example 5 1215 1200 680 860 495 345 2.08 5 Example 6 1216 1200 640 840 505 372 2.02 5 Example 7 1220 1190 620 850 495 388 2.00 5 Example 8 1217 1190 600 850 500 404 1.98 5 Example 9 1227 1120 580 850 500 434 1.96 5 Example10 1218 1150 680 850 500 440 1.93 5 Example11 1214 1170 670 860 495 447 1.91 5 Example12 1205 1200 640 870 590 348 2.07 5 Example13 1196 1190 640 880 495 404 2.01 5 Example14 1208 1190 650 850 500 348 2.23 5 Example15 1206 1180 650 830 505 349 2.19 5 Example16 1200 1180 660 830 515 344 2.24 5 Example17 1192 1180 680 800 460 346 2.27 4 Example18 1172 1170 510 810 495 349 2.29 4 Example19 1206 1190 690 780 500 355 2.03 5 Example20 1220 1200 680 810 505 340 2.04 5 Example21 1215 1200 640 850 510 341 2.09 5 Example22 1214 1190 630 850 515 347 2.03 5 Example23 1206 1190 620 850 510 343 2.04 5 Example__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 31__________________________________________________________________________SampleSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %)No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B__________________________________________________________________________24 0.0020 0.02 0.66 0.037 0.007 0.054 0.0019 0.041 0.011 --25 0.0019 0.01 1.25 0.045 0.006 0.055 0.0020 0.046 0.006 --26 0.0020 0.02 0.89 0.051 0.009 0.060 0.0019 0.048 0.027 --27 0.0021 0.01 1.44 0.049 0.011 0.062 0.0022 0.043 -- 0.000328 0.0021 0.02 0.56 0.044 0.009 0.058 0.0021 0.044 -- 0.000729 0.0022 0.03 0.87 0.048 0.008 0.055 0.0019 0.052 -- 0.001330 0.0017 0.02 1.05 0.031 0.009 0.060 0.0020 0.055 -- 0.001931 0.0019 0.02 1.02 0.039 0.007 0.066 0.0019 0.038 0.009 0.000432 0.0020 0.01 1.69 0.044 0.009 0.049 0.0022 0.029 0.014 2.000733 0.0020 0.02 2.00 0.061 0.007 0.054 0.0019 0.044 0.010 --34 0.0019 0.01 1.24 0.067 0.006 0.055 0.0020 0.046 0.007 --35 0.0020 0.32 1.00 0.041 0.009 0.060 0.0019 0.048 0.014 --36 0.0021 0.01 0.99 0.055 0.011 0.062 0.0020 0.043 -- 0.000437 0.0021 0.02 1.21 0.066 0.009 0.058 0.0021 0.044 -- 0.000638 0.0022 0.03 0.77 0.074 0.008 0.055 0.0019 0.052 -- 0.001439 0.0017 0.02 0.89 0.049 0.009 0.060 0.0020 0.255 -- 0.001840 0.0042* 0.01 1.22 0.041 0.008 0.062 0.0017 0.044 -- --41 0.0022 0.07* 0.78* 0.055 0.010 0.058 0.0021 0.048 -- --42 0.0021 0.02 0.43* 0.056 0.009 0.066 0.0022 0.065 -- --43 0.0018 0.01 2.54* 0.048 0.011 0.059 0.0018 0.055 -- --44 0.0020 0.02 0.90 0.015* 0.010 0.066 0.0017 0.038 -- --45 0.0017 0.01 0.94 0.104* 0.009 0.056 0.0020 0.045 -- 0.0004__________________________________________________________________________ Asterisk "*" indicates the results out of the scope of the present invention
TABLE 32__________________________________________________________________________Sample -400 Temp. Coiling Annealing AlloyingSteel ([Ti %] + [P %]) + for Temp. Temp. Temp. TSNo. 1250 Heating (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) (MPa) r Value Appearance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________24 1218 1190 640 850 510 350 2.02 5 Example25 1214 1180 640 840 500 391 2.06 5 Example26 1210 1190 680 850 500 382 2.01 5 Example27 1213 1190 680 850 515 399 2.02 5 Example28 1215 1190 640 880 510 405 2.00 5 Example29 1210 1200 620 870 500 407 1.98 5 Example30 1213 1180 680 860 500 407 1.93 5 Example31 1219 1180 690 850 515 410 1.97 5 Example32 1221 1190 680 850 500 436 1.92 5 Example33 1208 1190 640 860 505 444 1.91 5 Example34 1205 1190 620 860 520 391 2.05 5 Example35 1212 1190 600 870 505 393 2.01 5 Example36 1211 1200 620 880 510 376 1.99 5 Example37 1206 1200 640 870 495 391 1.93 5 Example38 1200 1190 680 890 490 363 2.01 5 Example39 1208 1190 620 880 495 378 1.99 5 Example40 1216 1200 600 870 500 385 1.87 5 Comparative Example41 1209 1180 680 850 515 346 2.11 3 Comparative Example42 1202 1190 590 850 510 325 2.23 5 Comparative Example43 1209 1180 620 850 525 405 1.65 4 Comparative Example44 1229 1190 640 860 500 320 2.25 3 Comparative Example45 1190 1180 640 870 505 440 1.72 5 Comparative Example__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 33__________________________________________________________________________SampleSteel CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (wt %)No. C Si Mn P S sol. Al N Ti Nb B__________________________________________________________________________46 0.0015 0.02 1.05 0.041 0.007 0.104* 0.0022 0.048 0.012 --47 0.0018 0.01 1.21 0.039 0.009 0.056 0.0042* 0.022 -- --48 0.0016 0.02 0.89 0.056 0.012 0.066 0.0023 0.018* -- --49 0.0020 0.01 0.98 0.066 0.010 0.057 0.0021 0.152* -- --50 0.0021 0.02 1.44 0.048 0.010 0.048 0.0020 0.043 0.004* --51 0.0019 0.01 1.25 0.050 0.007 0.050 0.0017 0.039 0.033* --52 0.0020 0.03 1.90 0.061 0.007 0.054 0.0019 0.144 -- 0.0001*53 0.0016 0.01 2.01 0.044 0.009 0.053 0.0020 0.048 -- 0.0022*54 0.0018 0.02 0.78 0.048 0.007 0.055 0.0021 0.045 -- --55 0.0016 0.02 0.80 0.054 0.007 0.058 0.0020 0.099 -- --56 0.0020 0.02 0.77 0.061 0.009 0.056 0.0019 0.101 -- --57 0.0021 0.02 0.65 0.070 0.001 0.058 0.0021 0.145 -- --58 0.0022 0.01 0.99 0.045 0.009 0.054 0.0023 0.089 -- --59 0.0019 0.01 1.01 0.052 0.009 0.049 0.0019 0.105 -- 0.0004__________________________________________________________________________ Asterisk "*" indicates the results out of the scope of the present invention
TABLE 34__________________________________________________________________________Sample -400 Temp. Coiling Annealing AlloyingSteel ([Ti %] + [P %]) + for Temp. Temp. Temp. TSNo. 1250 Heating (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) (.degree. C.) (MPa) r Value Appearance Remarks__________________________________________________________________________46 1214 1200 680 850 505 380 1.85 4 Comparative Example47 1222 1190 640 850 510 392 1.77 5 Comparative Example48 1220 1190 620 850 500 346 1.79 5 Comparative Example49 1163 1150 630 850 500 344 2.21 1 Comparative Example50 1174 1170 650 850 505 388 2.13 3 Comparative Example51 1214 1200 660 850 510 376 1.83 5 Comparative Example52 1618 1150 680 860 510 444 2.11 3 Comparative Example53 1213 1200 640 870 510 439 1.76 5 Comparative Example54 1213 1240* 640 880 505 341 2.05 1 Comparative Example55 1189 1180 710* 850 495 343 1.77 4 Comparative Example56 1185 1180 480* 850 490 349 1.65 4 Comparative Example57 1164 1150 640 930* 490 347 1.53 4 Comparative Example58 1196 1190 620 850 440* 345 2.05 1 Comparative Example59 1187 1180 620 860 610* 373 1.90 2 Comparative Example__________________________________________________________________________ Symbol * indicates the result out of the scope of the present invention.

Number	Name	Date	Kind
5384206	Ushioda et al.	Jan 1995
5470403	Yoshinaga et al.	Nov 1995

Number	Date	Country
61-60860	Mar 1986	JPX
61-291924	Dec 1986	JPX
2-38550	Feb 1990	JPX
2-34722	Feb 1990	JPX
2-185949	Jul 1990	JPX
4-52229	Feb 1992	JPX
4080349	Mar 1992	JPX
4-236751	Aug 1992	JPX
4-263054	Sep 1992	JPX
5-106003	Apr 1993	JPX
406017142	Jan 1994	JPX
406081043	Mar 1994	JPX

Method for producing galvanized steel sheet

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Parent Case Info

US Referenced Citations (2)

Foreign Referenced Citations (12)

Divisions (1)