This application is the National Stage of PCT/EP2016/063259 filed on Jun. 10, 2016, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of German Application Nos. 10 2015 109 185.2 filed on Jun. 10, 2015 and 10 2015 116 448.5 filed Sep. 29, 2015. The international application under PCT article 21(2) was not published in English.
The invention relates to an injection molding process for injecting a shoe soling comprising at least two adjacent injection molding layers onto a shoe upper drawn over a shoe last, using a mold cavity comprising a frame, said cavity being covered at the top end by the shoe upper also serving as a mold cover, with plastic material being injected into the mold cavity below the shoe upper.
An injection molding process of this type has been disclosed via EP 2 103 420 A2, for example. By means of this known method, the shoe upper used as a mold cover for the mold cavity has been provided in a preceding injection molding process with an injection molding layer serving as sole of the shoe upper, with an outsole having been inserted into the mold cavity, resulting in a three-layer shoe soling consisting of outsole, midsole and upper sole. However, at least two injection molding steps with an intermediate mold opening are required to produce this three-layer shoe soling.
For the manufacturer of shoes or shoe soling, optimized cycle times of the machines and injection equipment are of prime importance to achieve the largest possible number of items to be produced. However, if, to attain the desired physical or optical properties such as the strength or color of the material, for example, a shoe soling of two adjoining injection molding layers has to be produced, each injection molding layer increases the cycle time many times over because of the material used and the chemical reaction times that have to be observed between the individual injection processes in order to manufacture a shoe or shoe soling of good quality.
It is thus the objective of the present invention to further develop the injection molding method of the kind first mentioned above, in such a way that two adjacent injection molding layers of the shoe soling can be produced in a single operation, i.e. without an interim mold opening being required, from plastic materials having different properties and reaction times.
In order to achieve this objective, the invention proposed, based on the injection molding process of the kind first mentioned above, that prior to covering the mold cavity a film be clamped over the mold cavity by means of a clamping device mounted on the frame of the mold cavity and that, when filling the mold cavity, the space below the film is first filled with plastic material to produce the first injection molding layer and then, for the production of the adjacent second injection molding layer, the space above the film is filled with plastic material, wherein plastic materials being used that inseparably attach to the film.
In the method proposed by the invention, the film separates the adjacent molding layers during curing, resulting in the different reaction times of the plastic materials used to be irrelevant. On the other hand, the film connects the two adjacent injection molding layers inseparably with each other. As a result, the invention makes it possible to produce two adjacent injection molding layers, i.e. in the case of the embodiment example elucidated below, the midsole and the upper sole of a multilayer shoe soling can be produced in one operation, i.e. without having the mold to be opened intermittently.
In particular, in the case of the example of the method for manufacturing soles for shoes, one embodiment provides that the first layer underneath the film may be injected directly onto a layer that has already been injected or inserted into the cavity and that is activated, which in the specific case may be an outsole. The layer above is then the midsole and the layer injected above the film in this example is the upper sole, through which—as the name says—the complete sole package is connected to the shoe upper thus forming the finished shoe.
According to one embodiment, it is proposed that the same injection unit can be employed to inject the plastic materials into both the first and second injection ducts. The injection ducts are arranged vertically on top of each other and the injection unit can appropriately be moved vertically.
Alternatively, according to another embodiment, it may of course also be provided that two units arranged next to each other, which are rigidly aligned, are used for producing the respective layers.
Moreover, the invention also provides the use of a flow aid underneath the mold cover to keep the space for the production of the second injection molding layer open. During operation, this flow aid keeps the space above the film open, which is required for the production of the second injection molding layer, until this space is to be filled to produce the second injection molding layer.
Alternatively, for the creation of such a space and before filling the mold cavity, the invention provides that the mold cover is immersed by a short stroke into the mold cavity thereby tensioning the film downwards, following which the plastic material of the first injection molding layer is injected and attaches to the film, and afterwards by lifting the mold cover to its normal position, the space for injecting the plastic material of the adjacent second injection molding layer above the film is cleared.
In the case of one preferred embodiment, the clamping device includes two parts arranged on the frame, which are folded down to the top of the frame for clamping the film in place. For this purpose, the parts of the clamping device are attached directly to the respective lateral mold segment for manual closing and opening via a folding hinge.
Alternatively, in a different embodiment, the clamping device can include elements arranged on the cover part, which, in order to clamp the film in place, are lowered to the top of the frame together with the cover part when the mold cavity is closed.
The present invention is elucidated in sufficient detail by way of the following figures, where
In
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2015 109 185 | Jun 2015 | DE | national |
10 2015 116 448 | Sep 2015 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2016/063259 | 6/10/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/198574 | 12/15/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3319301 | Ludwig | May 1967 | A |
3608004 | Borisuck | Sep 1971 | A |
4120477 | Justamante | Oct 1978 | A |
4716662 | Bar | Jan 1988 | A |
5785910 | Sakashita | Jul 1998 | A |
5945059 | Atake | Aug 1999 | A |
7682549 | Lang et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7767127 | Bramani | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20060225305 | Morgan | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080229625 | Frasson | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20110047833 | Tai | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20150016144 | Keist et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
14 85 628 | Jan 1971 | DE |
17 29 141 | Aug 1971 | DE |
20 20 335 | Dec 1971 | DE |
1 629 956 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2 103 420 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2 803 463 | Nov 2014 | EP |
1 092 136 | Nov 1967 | GB |
1 170 744 | Nov 1969 | GB |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report of PCT/EP2016/063259, dated Sep. 29, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180222098 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |