Patent Application
20250107549
The present disclosure relates to methods for producing oleogels. The disclosure relates also to oleogels obtainable by the method, and use of the oleogels.
Oleogels are semi-solid self-supporting lipid-based materials developed as substitutes for saturated and hydrogenated fats. They are composed of large volumes (>85%) of liquid oil entrapped in a three-dimensional network of gelators.
Oleogels can be prepared using direct and indirect methods. Indirect methods are foam-, emulsion-, solvent-exchange, and aerogel-templated methods, where proteins or polysaccharides are used to prepare a scaffold in which oil is absorbed or retained. However, these methods are time consuming, expensive, and currently industrially unfeasible.
The direct method does not need specific equipment, requires little energy, and is industrially scalable. In the method crystalline molecules are used as oleogelators to directly gel the oil followed by heating and cooling steps. The oleogelators rearrange themselves during cooling to form a crystalline network. The network entraps the oil and gels the system. However, the applicability of oleogels produced by the direct method as replacements for saturated fats is hindered by storage instability, low tolerance to shear force, oxidation of essential fatty acids during oleogel production, and high digestibility, Moreover, the direct method can be applied only with molecules that are dispersible in oil and have self-assembly properties, all of which limiting the production of oleogels.
Borrego M. et al. (International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2021, Vol. 180, pp. 212-221) disclosed a method for producing an oleogel lubricant including slow addition of castor oil to electrospun nanostructures consisting of low-sulfonate Kraft lignin (KL) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). KL/PVP concentration in the oleogel was 10-30 wt.-%.
Rubio-Valle, J. F. et al. (Polymers, 2021, Vol. 13, No. 2206, pp. 1-15) disclosed a method for producing oleogel lubricants by dispensing eucalyptus Kraft lignin (ELK)/PVP nanostructures in castor oil at gentle agitation. Stable oleogels were formed when the EKL/PVP concentration was higher than 15 wt.-%.
However, there still is need for further methods for producing oleogels.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present disclosure to provide a new method for producing oleogels, wherein the method comprising the following steps
It is also an object of the present disclosure to provide oleogels obtainable by a method comprising the following steps
It is still an object of the present disclosure to provide a new use of the oleogels obtainable by a method of the present disclosure as substitute for saturated and/or hydrogenated fat.
Exemplifying and non-limiting embodiments of the invention, both as to constructions and to methods of operation, together with additional objects and advantages thereof, are best understood from the following description of specific and exemplifying embodiments when read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
The verbs “to comprise” and “to include” are used in this document as open limitations that neither exclude nor require the existence of unrecited features. The features recited in the accompanied depending claims are mutually freely combinable unless otherwise explicitly stated. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the use of “a” or “an”, i.e. a singular form, throughout this document does not exclude a plurality.
According to one aspect the present invention concerns a method for producing oleogels. The method comprises the following steps:
The polymer nanofiber mat is preferably produced by electrospinning. Electrospinning (ES) is a nanotechnology that employs an electric field to pull nanofibers from a polymer solution. A Taylor cone is formed at the surface of the polymer solution extrusion, typically charged with high voltage (several −kV), and it serves as the location of the ejection of an initial fibre. The final fibre is typically formed through a drying process. The product is collected onto a charged collector by electric attraction (typically higher potential than at the polymer, e.g., ground or positive potential). Different implementations of ES exist which feature different potentials at the source polymer and target.
According to one embodiment the polymer nanofiber is produced using conventional ES, wherein fibre ejection takes place from a small polymer droplet located at an orifice, e.g., at a tip of a charged needle. The polymer fibre thus formed is guided towards the collector plate. The mat is obtained by moving the collector plate. The droplet is refilled by pumping new polymer solution to the needle tip through the needle.
According to a preferable embodiment the polymer nanofiber mat is prepared using a syringe-free electrospinning device wherein the nanofibers are generated by using ultrasound. An exemplary electrospinning device suitable for the method is disclosed in EP 3274491, incorporated here by reference.
For producing the polymer nanofiber mat using an electrospinning device such as that of EP 3274491, step a) of the method comprises the following
According to a preferable embodiment the polymer medium is liquid. The ultrasound, preferably ultrasound burst or pulse, generates a protrusion on the top surface of the polymer medium located in the open chamber of the device. It is preferred that the ultrasound burst, or pulse is sufficiently strong that the tip of the protrusion is above the top edge of the walls of the open chamber. This ensures a stable electric field between the tip of the protrusion and the target by diminishing the effects of the walls on the electric DC-field.
The voltage is applied to the polymer medium by using an electrode located in the open chamber and within the polymer medium. The voltage is preferably between 5 kV and 50 kV. This forms a Taylor cone and thus ejection of a polymer fiber from the tip of the Taylor cone. The ejecting polymer fiber is collected onto a grounded or charged collector that is flat, conical or of any other geometric shape. The collectors are known in the art. The nanofibers of the polymer nanofiber mat have typically a diameter of 5 nm to 1000 nm or up to 2000 nm. The larger fibers are not preferred if the oleogels are for use as substitute of saturated and/or hydrogenated fat of a food product since an oleogel including particles over 20 μm may feel in mouth as grainy.
The polymer suitable for the method is preferably selected from a group consisting of polyethylene oxide, cellulose, and derivatives thereof, pectin, resistant starch, zein, agar, ρ-glucan, and mixtures thereof.
Further polymers suitable for the method include gelatin, dextran, high amylose starch, and hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose (HPMC).
The oil suitable for the method may be selected from a group consisting of soybean oil, canola oil, corn oil, sunflower oil, safflower oil, flaxseed oil, almond oil, peanut oil, fish oil, algal oil, palm oil, palm stearin, palm olein, palm kernel oil, high oleic soybean/canola/sunflower/safflower oils, hydrogenated palm kernel oil, hydrogenated palm stearin, fully hydrogenated soy-bean/canola/cottonseed oils, high stearic sunflower oil, enzymatically and chemically inter-esterified oils, butter oil, cocoa butter, avocado oil, almond oil, coconut oil, cottonseed oil, mineral oil, silicon oil, fluorinated oil, and mixtures thereof, preferably from rapeseed oil, walnut oil, and flaxseed oil and mixtures thereof.
According to a preferable embodiment the oil is an edible oil, and the polymer is an edible polymer.
According to another embodiment the oil is a non-edible oil, and the polymer is a non-edible polymer.
Non-limiting exemplary polymer/oil combinations are the following PEO/rapeseed oil; gelatin/rapeseed oil, dextran/rapeseed oil, starch/rapeseed oil, PEO/walnut oil, gelatin/walnut oil, dextran/walnut oil, starch/walnut oil, PEO/flaxseed oil, gelatin/flaxseed oil, dextran/flaxseed oil, and starch/flaxseed oil.
According to the method the polymer nanofiber mat is added to an oil to form an admixture. The mat is cut into pieces before admixing. Average area of the pieces of the polymer nanofiber mat is 1 cm2 or less, preferably 5 mm2 or less. An exemplary piece is a square of 2-2 mm2. To obtain an oleogel using electrospun nanofibers mats, the diameter of the nanofibers is preferably between 100 nm and 2000 nm. The concentration of the polymer nanofiber mat in the admixture is more than 1 wt.-%, preferably at least 5 wt.-%, more preferably at least 10 wt.-%, even more preferably 10-25 wt.-%, still even more preferably 10-20 wt.-% such as 10 wt.-%. The optimal concentration is dependent on the polymer.
The method comprises milling the mixture. The milling is performed below the temperature wherein the polymer transits to a glassy state. The crystallization and glass transition temperatures are known in the art, or they can be measured using known procedures. The milling temperature may be 20° C. or lower, such as below 4° C. The optimal milling temperature depends on the properties of the oil and the polymer.
According to an embodiment the milling comprises cryo-milling the admixture, preferably at a temperature from −180° C. to −150° C.
It is known that some oils transit to glassy state without crystallization if cooled rapidly enough. For example, castor oil, when cooled at rates more than 5° C./min, forms a lipid glass.
According to one embodiment the milling of step c) comprises
The diameter of nanofiber mat fragments obtained by milling in the oil is preferably between 10 μm and 200 μm.
According to one aspect the present disclosure concerns oleogels obtainable by the method. When the oleogels are used as substitutes for saturated and/or hydrogenated fat of food, it is essential that the oil is an edible oil, and the polymer is an edible polymer. However, there are applications wherein the oil and the polymer does not need to be edible. For example, when the oleogel is used as a lubricant, it is even preferable that the oil and the polymer are not edible.
Polyethylene oxide (PEO, 900 kDa) gelatin, HPMC, Tween 20, glacial acetic acid, and formic acid were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). High amylose starch (HYLON® VII) was from Ingredion (Westchester, Illinois, United States). Rapeseed, walnut, and flaxseed oils were purchased in a local supermarket. Deionized water was using in all experiments.
The following solutions were prepared
All solutions were stirred overnight at ambient temperature prior to electrospinning.
PEO-based nanofibers were produced using a custom-made ultrasound enhanced electrospinning (USES) device disclosed in EP 3274491. A 4% (w/w) solution of PEO in water was added to the USES device. Electrospinning was initiated by applying 8 kV voltage between the spinning solution and the collector plate positioned 15 cm above the solution. The piezoelectric transducer was driven using a 260-mV sine wave. Other ultrasound parameters were as follows: pulse repetition frequency of 100 Hz, duty cycle of 11%, cycles per burst 2970. USES was performed at 40% RH and 23° C. PEO nanofiber mats were collected after 2 h of spinning.
A spinning solution prepared as disclosed above was added to the USES system. An acoustic fountain was generated with a pulsed sinusoidal signal with a 2.7-MHz driving frequency. Pulse repetition frequency, duty cycle, and corresponding cycle rates per burst were adjusted to obtain a stable spinning. Electrospinning was initiated by applying a 9-15-kV voltage between the spinning solution and the collector plate. The collector plate was held at a constant distance of 10-17 cm above the solution. USES was performed at 20-40% RH and 20-25° C. The PEO, gelatin, dextran, high amylose starch, and HPMC nanofiber mats produced were collected on aluminium foil after 2 h of spinning.
USES PEO nanofiber mats were cut into pieces, added into 10-mL milling cups with two 10-mm diameter stainless steel balls, and plunged in liquid nitrogen for 10 min. Then, nanofibers were cryo-milled for 5 min, cooled again for 10 min in liquid nitrogen, and milled for another 3 min. Total milling time was 8 min. In some samples, cooling and 3-min milling were repeated two more times after the 8-min milling cycle was completed. Total milling time in the last case was 14 min.
The nanofiber mats were removed from the aluminium foil and cut into pieces (not exceeding 1 cm2) with scissors, added to rapeseed oil, walnut oil, and flaxseed oil at increasing concentrations (2.5%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%) aiming to produce 1 g oleogel in total. The mixture was added in 10-mL stainless steel milling cups with one/two 12-mm diameter stainless steel balls. Following, the mixtures were milled using an MM400 laboratory mixer mill (Retsch, Haan, Germany) between 5 s and 8 min at around 20° C.
The microstructure of oleogels was analysed using an AxioVision polarized light microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) connected to an AxioCam MRm digital camera. An aliquot of sample was placed on a glass slide and a coverslip was gently pressed on top of it. Samples were analysed using a 20× objective. Images were acquired and processed using ZEN 2.6 (Zeiss). Images were recorded isothermally at room temperature or during heating from 20° C. to 80° C. at 5° C./min and subsequent cooling from 80° C. to 20° C. at 5° C./min using a PE120 temperature control system (Linkam Scientific Instruments Ltd., Tadworth, UK) attached to the microscope stage.
The microstructural analysis of selected oleogels was performed using SEM as described by Bhattarai et al. (2022). Before imaging, the oleogels were de-oiled using isobutanol (Blake & Marangoni, 2015). Samples were gently transferred onto 25 mm diameter 0.2 μm pore-sized polycarbonate disks (Whatman, Maidstone, UK) placed on top of Whatman 1 filter paper. Isobutanol was added dropwise onto the sample surface and was allowed to dry for 48 h at room temperature before imaging. Samples were coated with Au—Pd alloy (2-nm thick layer) using a Cressington HR208 high-resolution sputter coater (Cressington Scientific Instruments, Watford, UK). Imaging was performed at RT with a Hitachi S-4800 (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) field emission scanning electron microscope.
The thermal properties of PEO powder, oils, USES PEO nanofibers, and oleogels were analysed using a DSC823e differential scanning calorimeter (Mettler Toledo, Columbus, USA) mounted with a TS0801RO sample robot (Mettler Toledo). Samples were prepared by carefully weighing 6-9 mg in 40-μL aluminium DSC pans. Samples were kept at 20° C. for 5 min and cooled from 20 to −100° C. at 5° C./min, then held at −100° C. for 10 min, heated to 20° C. at 5° C./min, held at 20° C. for 10 min, and repeated the same cycle one more time. In another experiment, samples were heated from 20° C. to 100° C. at 5° C./min. Measurements were performed under nitrogen flow (50 mL/min). An empty pan was used as a reference in the DSC cell. The peak melting temperature (Tm) and peak crystallization temperature (Tc) were taken as the minimum and maximum values of heat flow during transition, respectively. The glass transition temperature (Tg) was taken as the mid-point of the transition. Total peak enthalpy (ΔH) was calculated by integrating the melting curves. Data were processed using STARe DB V9.00 software (Mettler Toledo).
By cryo-milling the nanofiber at temperatures below its Tg (<−58.4° C., as determined using DSC) to assure that the nanofiber structure is rigid and can be broken, and by then adding 10 wt.-% of the resulting powder to oil did not allow the formation of oleogel (
On the other hand, by cutting PEO nanofiber mat in small pieces, adding it to oil and then cryo-milling the dispersion for 8 min, it was possible to obtain nanofiber fragments which showed the original porous structure of the nanofiber mat (FIGS. 3A1 and 3B1). However, at low concentrations (2.5 wt.-% and 5 wt.-%) no oleogel was formed (
When the PEO nanofiber concentration reached 10 wt.-% (
To show the universality of the method, 10 wt.-% PEO nanofiber-based oleogels were prepared using walnut (
During heating the nanofiber fragments in oleogel melt and dissolve (
Upon cooling, PEO recrystallizes, however, the nanofiber porous structure is lost, and oil is expelled from the sample during PEO recrystallization, highlighting that nanofiber-based oleogels are not thermoreversible in contrast to the state-of-the-art oleogels formed with the direct method and having e.g., monoglyceride, waxes, and ethyl cellulose as oleogelators.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20225585 | Jun 2022 | FI | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/FI2023/050365 | 6/19/2023 | WO |
