Method for producing shaped polymeric microparticles

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10384372
  • Patent Number
    10,384,372
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 8, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 20, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
Method for producing shaped polymeric microparticles of non-spherical shape, comprising the steps of: placing one or more microparticles of substantially spherical shape in a respective micro-cavity of a mold having the desired non-spherical shape; subjecting said microparticles to softening by exposure to a solvent or mixture of solvent/non-solvent, in the liquid or vapor state, adapted to plasticize the polymeric material constituting said microparticles, and possibly assisting the solvent plasticization process by heat treatment, not excluding the possibility, in less critical cases in terms of conservation of the microstructure, of carrying out heat treatment exclusively, at a temperature not exceeding 40% of the glass transition temperature of the polymer material; and removing said microparticles from the mold cavities.
Description

This is a national stage application filed under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of international application PCT/IB2014/060530, filed under the authority of the Patent Cooperation Treaty on Apr. 8, 2014, published; which claims the benefit of Patent Application No. TO2013A000284, filed on Apr. 9, 2013. The entire disclosures of all the aforementioned applications are expressly incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.


The present invention relates to a method for preparing shaped polymeric microparticles.


The term “shaped” is used in the present description to denote particles having a shape other than the spherical or substantially spherical shape which is the thermodynamically favourable shape and which can therefore be produced easily in various sizes, with various polymers, in batch processes.


In particular, the invention relates to the production of engineered shaped microparticles. The term “engineered” is intended to denote particles having a suitable microstructure and formulation, for example microparticles with controlled porosity, or polymeric microparticles loaded in advance with bioactive molecules.


In recent decades, there has been a growing interest in the production of shaped polymeric micro-particles for various applications, ranging from tissue engineering (Soft Matter, 2009, 5, 1312-1319) to microreservoirs for drug delivery, such as micro- and nano-vehicles to be introduced into the body (Macromolecular Research, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 163-167 (2009); Small 2007, 3, no. 3, 412-418, Journal of Controlled Release 104 (2005) 51-66; Biomaterials 29 (2008) 2113-2124; Biomed Microdevices (2007) 9:223-234).


In particular, in the field of tissue engineering where anisotropic properties are highly desirable, attention has been focused recently on polymeric microparticles having shapes other than spherical. Shapes other than spherical may also be used in photonics and as probes for rheological analysis (Langmuir 2005, 21, 2113-2116). Other possible applications relate to advanced forms of drug delivery, forms of controlled drug release and applications in the field of targeting and recognition (Biomaterials 27 (2006) 4034-4041).


For these purposes, the morphology of the particle (that is to say, the shape and size) must be engineered according to the function of the particulate agent (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10096-10100).


By contrast with the production of the thermodynamically favourable spherical shape, which is easily obtainable, other shapes require more sophisticated procedures for their production and consolidation. Three main methods of producing shaped microparticles are known from the literature.


A first approach is that of microfluidics (Langmuir 2005, 21, 2113-2116), in which polymer droplets, formed by subjecting a polymer to a shear force in a continuous aqueous phase in a T-junction, are constrained to assume non-spherical shapes by confinement, using appropriate microchannel geometries.


Although this method enables precise shapes to be produced, it is subject to limitations in respect of the limited number of shapes that can be produced (mainly cylinders or parallelepipeds and small discs), the limited number of polymers that can be used, and the limited production rate, given that the microparticles are produced one at a time.


Another approach is based on a moulding method, in which the shape is defined by the cavity of the mould. In this case, the main problem is the presence of a continuous layer connecting the microparticles which therefore remain connected to each other.


This problem can be tackled by using special moulds made of PFPE, or, more advantageously, by using surface treated PDMS as the mould material, but the optimization of the process in order to vary the type of polymer and the shape may still be costly in terms of time.


Furthermore, with these methods it would be difficult or even impossible to produce specific thicknesses (of more than a few μm) for some polymers. Finally, the larger the operating area, the more difficult it becomes to avoid the presence of the continuous layer. In any case, even if this layer is avoided, the aforesaid known methods cannot always be used to form a suitable microstructure.


WO2008/031035 describes a further procedure in which polymeric microspheres are incorporated into a polymer matrix and subjected to stretching. The initial particles are heated above their glass transition temperature or subjected to plasticization by means of solvent. Theoretically, this method could conserve the microstructure and/or preserve any active agents with suitable arrangements. However, the method is still dependent on the material used and is limited in terms of the shapes that can be obtained, as well as being costly in terms of time.


The main object of the present invention is to provide a method for producing shaped polymeric microparticles which is versatile in terms of the materials that can be used and shapes that can be obtained, while being inexpensive.


Another object of the invention is to provide a method that can be used to produce engineered particles which have specific properties or which maintain engineered properties of spherical particles.


In view of these objects, the invention proposes a method as defined in the claims below, which form an integral part of the present description.


The method according to the invention provides for the use of pre-formed spherical microparticles as the initial material. In the most advantageous embodiment, use is made of pre-formed spherical particles that are engineered; that is to say, they have a microstructure, for example porosity or loading with active principles, which substantially corresponds to the microstructure which is to be obtained for the shaped microparticles forming the desired end product.


The initial spherical microparticles, which may or may not be engineered, may be produced by a variety of known methods, for example spray drying, interface polymerization, hot-melt encapsulation, emulsion, microencapsulation with solvent evaporation, coacervation, microfluidics, preferably using a porous membrane, and the like.


Microparticles produced in this way are transformed into the desired non-spherical shape, using an appropriate mould which has microcavities (not interconnected) having the desired shape, generally arranged in an array or matrix.


Preferably, each spherical microparticle is positioned in a respective micro-cavity of the mould and is then subjected to softening by exposure to a solvent adapted to plasticize the polymeric material, or to a mixture of solvent and non-solvent, in the liquid state or, preferably, in the vapour state. Alternatively, the softening may be assisted by heating, if necessary, to a temperature preferably below 60° C. and even more preferably below 40° C. Alternatively, in cases which are less critical for the conservation of the microstructure, and/or for more heat-resistant active principles, the softening may be provided by heat treatment, by heating to a temperature within the softening range of the polymer used, which is generally between the glass transition temperature and the melting point (for crystalline polymers), preferably not exceeding 40% above the glass transition temperature and preferably not exceeding 50° C.


The method reliably prevents the formation of a continuous layer (scum layer) which interconnects the microstructures, and is applicable to any type of polymer that is subject to softening, of any size, from sub-micrometric to sub-millimetric. It makes it possible to deform spherical microparticles having a size from a few microns to hundreds of microns in diameter, preferably from 2 μm to 600 μm, more preferably from 10 μm to 300 μm, the minimum size being determined by the capacity for automatic handling of the microparticles, and the maximum size being determined by the kinetics of plasticization. In the case of a cavity with a structured base, a further surface topography of the shaped microparticle can be obtained, and can also be submicrometric, down to a few tens of nanometers.


In particular, solvent-assisted forming in the mould cavity makes it possible to operate at ambient temperature, thus avoiding the degradation of active agents such as drugs or biomolecules incorporated in the pre-formed spherical microparticles, while also avoiding the degradation of the microstructure.


For example, if it is desired to maintain a specific porous microstructure providing a given release profile of active agents incorporated in the microparticle, the use of solvent treatment in the vapour phase at ambient temperature is highly preferable.


The use of microparticles loaded with various drugs or biomolecules can also be envisaged. For example, in the case of microneedles, microparticles loaded with various drugs can be used simultaneously in different cavities, for the production of an array of shaped microparticles suitable for multiple drug release.


The shaped microparticles are consolidated by evaporation of the solvent, or by cooling, in cases where forming is assisted by a temperature increase.


In a preferred embodiment, before consolidation, the microparticles in the softened state are subjected to a small degree of pressure, applied for example by means of a counter-mould such as a glass panel which is placed in contact with the microparticles within the mould cavity, in order to improve their forming in terms of faithfulness to the geometry of the cavity (for example, in order to obtain sharp edges, in the case of prismatic shapes).


Evidently, the material used for the mould cavity must be less adhesive than the material of the counter-mould; for example, a PDMS mould may be used with a glass counter-mould.


Naturally, the method may be used to obtain a wide variety of non-spherical shapes, such as discs, ellipsoids, bars and prismatic shapes, of various kinds. The method is applicable to any thermoplastic polymer, to be chosen according to the type of application from a wide variety of polymers, in combination with an appropriate choice of solvent or solvent/non-solvent system.


In the case of bioapplications, preferred polymers are, for example, PLA, PLGA, PCL, gelatine, and any biodegradable or biocompatible thermoplastic polymer.


As mentioned above, the initial spherical microparticles may contain a wide variety of additives such as functional active agents, drugs, active biomolecules, or ligands which facilitate the targeting of the microparticles on a specific site in vivo.





In the appended drawings,



FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of the mould apparatus used in the method according to the invention;



FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of a vaporizing device;



FIGS. 3a and 3b are photographs illustrating microparticles produced by the method of Example 1;



FIGS. 4a and 4b show confocal microscope images of porous microparticles, before and after the forming process respectively; and



FIG. 5 is a photograph produced by a scanning electron microscope showing shaped microspheres produced in Example 2.





For the application of the method according to the invention, an apparatus of the type shown schematically in FIGS. 1 and 2 was used.


This apparatus comprises a mould 2, having a plurality of mould microcavities 4. The mould may be made of various materials and may be produced by various suitable methods such as lithography, RIE or other technologies. In the tests that were conducted, a mould made of PDMS was used, produced in two stages using the replica moulding technique.


Initially, a reverse mould was produced with structures in relief, having the shape of the mould cavities to be provided, for example prismatic shapes with cross-shaped, triangular, rectangular bases, or cylindrical disc shapes.


The reverse mould was produced using a silicon substrate with microstructures of SUB, formed by means of a 2D laser system. The relief structures had a volume of about 4.2×106 μm3, corresponding to the volume of the microparticles to be produced.


For the production of the mould, PDMS in the liquid state (Sylgard 184®), previously mixed with a cross-linking agent in proportions by weight of 1:10, was poured on to the silicon/SU8 substrate and cured in an oven at 80° C. for 2 hours. The hardened PDMS mould was then easily separated from the reverse mould made of PMMA.


To enable an automated process to be provided, the apparatus used also comprises a micromanipulator 6 adapted to pick up a plurality of microspheres simultaneously and enable them to be deposited in the mould cavities 4.


By way of example, the micromanipulator device comprises a body defiling a suction chamber within it and having a lower wall with a plurality of holes communicating with said suction chamber and arranged in a matrix with an interval corresponding to the intervals of the mould cavities 4 formed in the mould.


A thin rigid tube or suction needle 8, the passage of which has a smaller diameter than that of the microspheres to be picked up and deposited, is connected to each hole. The upper wall of the body of the micromanipulator has a single hole to which is connected in a sealed way a manifold 10, formed by a thin tube or needle, which in turn can be connected to a vacuum pump.


When the vacuum pump has been started, the micromanipulator can be used to pick up a plurality of microspheres and enable them to be deposited in the mould cavities, after the vacuum pump has been stopped.


In order to avoid phenomena of aggregation of the microparticles due to electrostatic interactions that may occur, depending on the plastic material from which the particles are made, and in order to ensure that a single microsphere is retained at each suction hole, a small flow of air can be used, or a brushing operation can be carried out before the vacuum pump is stopped.


The same micromanipulator can be used to supply vapours of the solvent and plasticizer mixture, using a carrier gas such as nitrogen if necessary, in a localized manner on the microspheres or in the vicinity of the microspheres positioned in each mould cavity.


In order to generate a flow of solvent vapour, a conventional bubble vaporization apparatus 12 may be used, with a heating jacket 18, of the type shown schematically in FIG. 2. In this apparatus 12, a carrier, for example nitrogen, is fed to a porous partition 14 immersed in the liquid solvent solution 16. The solvent vapour that is generated may, as mentioned, be fed to the micromanipulator.


EXAMPLE 1—MICROSPHERES OF D,L-LACTIC-CO-GLYCOLIC ACID (PLGA) SOFTENED WITH A MIXTURE OF DIMETHYL CARBONATE (DMC) AND ETHANOL IN THE VAPOUR STATE

PLGA is known to be a polymer that is rapidly dissolved in DMC. On the other hand, ethanol does not dissolve PLGA.


Microspheres of PLGA (Resomer 504H®) with a volume of 4.2×106 μm3 were produced in advance by means of a suitable membrane system with a degree of porosity comparable to that of the spherical microparticles to be produced (Micropore® System).


Each microsphere was placed in a respective PDMS mould cavity (that is to say, one microsphere in one cavity), using the micromanipulator 6, as shown in FIG. 1. The mould was then positioned on a flat support with its flat lower wall facing the flat surface of the support.


A liquid solution of DMC and ethanol (DMC:EtOH, 2:1, v:v) was then vaporized, using a vaporization apparatus as described above, on to the microspheres placed in the cavities. After two minutes of vapour flow, a glass slide was placed in contact with the plasticized microspheres to improve the forming and for the purpose of removing the shaped microspheres from the mould.


The method was carried out at ambient temperature (about 25° C.) and ambient pressure.



FIGS. 3a and 3b show some of the microparticles obtained by using moulds with cavities of different shapes.


The method described above was repeated using microspheres having a porous internal structure.



FIGS. 4a and 4b are confocal microscope images which show how the porosity is maintained after forming, by using porous microparticles loaded with a chromophore.


EXAMPLE 2—MICROSPHERES OF POLYMERIC GELATINE PLASTICIZED WITH WATER IN THE LIQUID STATE

MICROSPHERES OF GELATINE POLYMER WITH A VOLUME OF 65.5×106 μM3, SOLUBLE IN WATER, WERE prepared by the known single emulsion method.


The procedure described in Example 1 was repeated, but the microspheres were softened by using water as the solvent in the liquid state. The water, at a temperature below 50° C., was injected through a syringe and allowed to evaporate partially. After 15 minutes in this condition, a glass slide was placed in contact with all the plasticized microspheres, to improve the shaping and for the purpose of removing the microspheres from the mould.



FIG. 5 shows shaped microspheres produced according to this example with various geometries. The high degree of faithfulness of the geometry of the shaped microparticles to the geometry of the mould cavity should be noted. Additionally, the shaped microparticles are separated from each other; that is to say, they are not interconnected.

Claims
  • 1. Method for producing non-spherical polymeric microparticles having a microporous structure, comprising the steps of: providing a plurality of polymeric microparticles, each microparticle having a microporous structure and having a substantially spherical shape filled with a drug or a biomolecule;placing each microparticle in a respective micro-cavity of a mould comprised of multiple non-spherical shaped micro-cavities;softening each microparticle by exposure to a solvent or mixture of solvent and non-solvent, in a vapour state at a temperature below 60° C. or exclusively by heat treatment at a temperature not exceeding 40% above the glass transition temperature thereby plasticizing the polymeric material constituting said microparticle;consolidating the thus obtained plasticized microparticle, andremoving each plasticized non-spherical microparticle from the respective mould micro-cavity, wherein the said plasticized non-spherical microparticle has maintained said microporous structure;whereby degradation of said drug or biomolecule in said plasticized non-spherical microparticle is avoided.
  • 2. Method according to claim 1, comprising the step of subjecting said microparticles to a pressure in the respective mould micro-cavities prior to removal from said mould micro-cavity.
  • 3. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the softening of the particles is caused by localized application in the mould micro-cavity of a solvent or a mixture of solvent and non-solvent in a vapour state, at a temperature below 40° C.
  • 4. Method according to claim 1 for deforming microparticles having a size from 2 μm to 600 μm in diameter.
  • 5. Method according to claim 1, wherein said micro-cavities have a base with a structured surface such that the shaped microparticles have a corresponding surface structure.
  • 6. Method according to claim 1, wherein said shaped microparticles are formed by a biodegradable or biocompatible thermoplastic polymer.
  • 7. Method according to claim 1, wherein said shaped microparticles comprise polylactic acid) (PLA), polylactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), polycaprolactone (PCL) or gelatine.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
TO2013A0284 Apr 2013 IT national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/IB2014/060530 4/8/2014 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2014/167495 10/16/2014 WO A
US Referenced Citations (63)
Number Name Date Kind
3057831 Holdsworth Oct 1962 A
3562042 Zilsperger et al. Feb 1971 A
3773919 Boswell et al. Nov 1973 A
3945926 Kesting Mar 1976 A
4247498 Castro Jan 1981 A
4257997 Soehngen Mar 1981 A
4671909 Torobin Jun 1987 A
4865789 Castro Sep 1989 A
4908271 Kasai Mar 1990 A
5372766 Roe Dec 1994 A
5411737 Hsu May 1995 A
5520923 Tjia May 1996 A
5686091 Leong Nov 1997 A
5750148 Maruyama May 1998 A
6187329 Agrawal Feb 2001 B1
6281256 Harris Aug 2001 B1
6342250 Masters Jan 2002 B1
6451240 Sherman Sep 2002 B1
20020082543 Park Jun 2002 A1
20030015498 Hirst Jan 2003 A1
20030116877 Liao Jun 2003 A1
20030143269 Oshlack Jul 2003 A1
20040156911 Chattopadhyay Aug 2004 A1
20050084532 Howdle Apr 2005 A1
20050084533 Howdle Apr 2005 A1
20050147646 Nilsson Jul 2005 A1
20050244468 Huang Nov 2005 A1
20070009564 McClain Jan 2007 A1
20070264481 DeSimone Nov 2007 A1
20080036119 Kanazawa Feb 2008 A1
20080181958 Rothrock Jul 2008 A1
20080282611 Graham Nov 2008 A1
20080299168 Dadey Dec 2008 A1
20080317816 Ma Dec 2008 A1
20090004262 Shaw Jan 2009 A1
20090028910 DeSimone Jan 2009 A1
20090081273 McDonald Mar 2009 A1
20090098183 Detamore Apr 2009 A1
20090136583 Park May 2009 A1
20090263460 McDonald Oct 2009 A1
20090289029 Vecchione Nov 2009 A1
20100143487 Masters Jun 2010 A1
20100244301 Ederer Sep 2010 A1
20100247663 Day Sep 2010 A1
20100291388 Alvarez Nov 2010 A1
20100311638 Tiege Dec 2010 A1
20100316591 Cotton Dec 2010 A1
20110172141 Naylor Jul 2011 A1
20110182805 DeSimone Jul 2011 A1
20110237748 Podobinski Sep 2011 A1
20110245456 Kim Oct 2011 A1
20120052581 DeRosa Mar 2012 A1
20120071575 DeRosa Mar 2012 A1
20120076860 Trout Mar 2012 A1
20120146255 Maschke Jun 2012 A1
20120321536 Kokini Dec 2012 A1
20130147074 Hielscher Jun 2013 A1
20130177598 Desimone Jul 2013 A1
20140197564 Tanaka Jul 2014 A1
20140242180 Lavik Aug 2014 A1
20150056294 Kaplan Feb 2015 A1
20150182461 Kim Jul 2015 A1
20150250926 McClain Sep 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2008031035 Mar 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (14)
Entry
Yin et al., Self-Assembly of Monodispersed Spherical Colloids into . . . with Well-Defined Sizes, Shapes, and Structures, Feb. 2001, Advanced Materials, 13 No. 4, pp. 267-271 (Year: 2001).
Acharya et al., “The hydrogel template method for fabrication of homogeneous nano/microparticles”, Journal of Controlled Release, 2010, vol. 141, pp. 314-319.
Champion et al., “Particle shape: A new design parameter for micro- and nanoscale drug delivery carriers”, Journal of Controlled Release, 2007, vol. 121, pp. 3-9.
Choi et al., “In Situ Microfluidic Synthesis of Monodisperse PEG Microspheres”, Macromolecular Research, 2009, vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 163-167.
Dendukuri et al., “Controlled Synthesis of Nonspherical Microparticles Using Microfluidics”, Langmuir, 2005, vol. 21, pp. 2113-2116.
Guan et al., “Fabrication of polymeric microparticles for drug delivery by soft lithography”, Biomaterials, 2006, vol. 27, pp. 4034-4041.
Guan et al., “Fabrication of Particulate Reservoir—Containing, Capsulelike, and Self-Folding Polymer Microstructures for Drug Delivery”, Small, 2007, vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 412-418.
Lee et al., “Dissolving microneedles for transdermal drug delivery”, Biomaterials, 2008, vol. 29, pp. 2113-2124.
Nichol et al., “Modular tissue engineering: engineering biological tissue from the bottom up”, Soft Matter, 2009, vol. 5, pp. 1312-1319.
Park et al., “Polymer particle-based micromolding to fabricate novel microstructures”, Biomed Microdevices, 2007, vol. 9, pp. 223-234.
Park et al., “Biodegradable polymer microneedles: Fabrication, mechanics and transdermal drug delivery”, Journal of Controlled Release, 2005, vol. 104, pp. 51-66.
Rolland et al., “Direct Fabrication and Harvesting of Monodisperse, Shape-Specific Nanobiomaterials”, Journal of American Chemical Society, 2005, vol. 127, pp. 10096-10100.
Yin et al., “Self-Assembly of Monodispersed Spherical Colloids into Complex Aggregates with Well-Defined Sizes, Shapes, and Structures”, Advanced Materials, 2001, vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 267-271.
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/IB2014/060530 filed Apr. 8, 2014, dated Jun. 27, 2014.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160039117 A1 Feb 2016 US