Not applicable.
The present invention relates to a method for profiling a fibrous web, advantageously a paper web, in a multiroll calender which includes: at least an upper set or stack of rolls having at least one calendering nip which is formed in a cross-direction of the web between two rolls and which profiles a first side of the web in the cross-direction by regulating distribution of load to the first side in the nip in a cross-machine direction; at least one lower set or stack of rolls having at least one calendering nip which is formed in the cross-direction of the web between two rolls and which profiles a second side of the web opposite to the first side in the cross-direction by regulating distribution of load to the second side in the nip in the cross-machine direction; and a reversing nip which does not profile the web and which is formed between the lowermost roll of the upper set or stack of rolls and the uppermost roll of the lower set or stack of rolls.
In today's multiroll calenders, calendering takes place by the method “from the top downward”, i.e. paper is passed first through a top nip to an upper set of rolls, in which only one of the paper surfaces is calendered. After that, paper is passed through a reversing nip to a lower set of rolls, in which the other surface is treated. Further, to control the CD profile of the caliper and surface properties of the paper, the top and bottom nips are generally provided with a profiling operation in which the distribution of the load applied to the paper is regulated in the cross direction. This kind of prior art arrangement is shown in
In the conventional construction, the upper and lower parts of the set of rolls thus apply calendering to the different surfaces of the paper. From the point of view of the paper, the situation is, however, very different in the upper and in the lower set of rolls, even though the situation would involve equal loading. In the first nip, paper is uncalendered, porous, moist and, at least in off-line arrangements, cool. In the lowermost nips, paper has already been compressed almost to its final density and, as a result of successive nip contacts, the paper has become considerably warmer (the average temperature has increased by about 40-50° C.) and dried (at least 2-3 percentage units). Thus, treatment of the different sides of the paper is performed in succession and in markedly different conditions.
It is known that in constant conditions under successive compression loads, most of the permanent compression of paper is produced during the first (1-5) times of loading. After that, the paper has already become compressed for the most part and deformations are more elastic, i.e. reversible. In practice, however, the warming of paper increases the amount of plastic compression of paper in the lower set of rolls. On the other hand, it may be thought that compression is higher in the first nips because of the higher moisture content of the paper.
Further, the gradient effects of calendering are more marked in the upper set of rolls because of a large temperature difference created between the thermo roll and the interior of cool paper. By contrast, in the bottom nip where paper has already warmed up by the effect of the preceding nips, it is not possible to achieve a corresponding temperature gradient with the same roll temperature. It may thus be noted that the gradient effects are more distinct in the first nips in the upper set of rolls and the operation of the lower set of rolls is based more on the compression of the paper structure which has been warmed throughout.
In conventional arrangements, profiling that takes place in the top nip operates relatively effectively, whereas it has been observed in practice that in the bottom nip the profiling of the surface properties of paper is rather ineffective, often even insufficient.
The primary aim of the present invention is to remove or at least to reduce the above-mentioned drawbacks, weaknesses associated with conventional calendering, and to provide an improved calendering method in order to assure profiling of the surface properties of both sides of paper in a more effective manner than before and to achieve an increased quality effect and a reduction in the dimensioning and loading values of the profiling devices when profiling becomes easier, which saves roll covers.
The invention is thus based on the novel and inventive basic idea that the first side and the second side of the web are profiled in calendering nips before the reversing nip.
In the arrangement according to the invention, profiling advantageously takes place in a situation in which a high temperature gradient is achieved for paper and the moisture content of paper is higher. In that connection, the calendering work used for profiling provides an increased quality effect, i.e. higher profiling efficiency. At the same time, as a by-product the advantage is achieved that the set of rolls is “separated” by means of the paper web from the other surrounding air space, which reduces evaporation from the paper web occurring on the set of rolls as well as heat loses from thermo rolls. An advantage is also that on the long web run from the bottom nip to the top nip it is easy to use, for example, moisturizing profiling, which facilitates disposition and optimisation of location. Further, because of the long web run, paper is cooled and, in the next nip, good conditions are again achieved for generation of a temperature gradient.
The invention and some of its embodiments regarded as advantageous are described in the following with reference to the appended patent drawing in which:
In accordance with the basic principle of the invention, a web is arranged to be passed in a multiroll calender which includes thermo rolls 3 and their backing rolls 2 such that a paper web 1 runs from one nip into the next via guide rolls 4 guiding the run of the web 1
The multiroll calender comprises a calender frame having the set of reversing rolls in the middle in the vertical direction, said set of rolls being formed of two hard rolls defining between them a non-web-profiling reversing nip. In addition, the multiroll calender has the upper set of rolls above the set of reversing rolls and the lower set of rolls beneath the set of reversing rolls.
The upper set of rolls comprises, arranged one upon the other in a stack, groups formed of a soft roll 2, advantageously a shoe roll provided with an internal loading shoe and, for example, with a polymer cover, and of a heatable calender roll, i.e. so-called thermo roll 3. There are two of these groups in the upper set of rolls in the example case of the ten-roll multiroll calender shown in
The lower set of rolls comprises, arranged one upon the other in a stack beneath the set of reversing rolls, groups formed of a heatable calender roll, i.e. so-called thermo roll 3, and of a soft roll 2, advantageously a shoe roll provided with an internal loading shoe and, for example, with a polymer cover. There are two of these groups in the lower set of rolls in the example case of the ten-roll multiroll calender shown in
When the calendering nip does not profile the web, it is sufficient that the thermo roll 3 is deflection-compensated. When the calendering nip profiles the web, it is advantageous that the thermo roll 3 is deflection-compensated and zone-controlled, which enables the roll to profile in the cross direction transverse to the running direction of the web 1.
The basic principle of the invention and some of its variants have been illustrated in
As can be seen in
In the variant of
It must be emphasized that the web run so far has been described above only by means of two embodiments. These arrangements are, of course, by no means the only possible arrangements but any arrangement in which the web run can be shortened from the conventional one between “the first and the last” nip profiling the opposite sides of the web. Hence, in a ten-roll calender it is possible to select as the calendering arrangement, for example:
It is also possible to arrange a separate profiling nip. This kind of arrangement has been shown in FIG. 3. As can be seen in
Further, it shall be noted that the invention has been described above only in connection with a ten-roll calender. The number of rolls is, however, of no significance to the applicability of the present invention. Thus, the present invention can be applied to any multiroll calender, for example, to a multiroll calender in which the number of rolls is not ten, but there are preferably an even number of rolls, such as, for example, 4, 6, 8, 12, etc.
With reference to
Above, the invention has been described only by way of example by means of some of its embodiments considered to be advantageous. The invention is, of course, not meant to be limited by this and, as is clear to a person skilled in the art, numerous alternative arrangements and modifications are feasible within the scope of protection of the new and inventive idea defined in the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20001362 | Jun 2000 | FI | national |
This application is a U.S. national stage application of International Application No. PCT/FI01/00534, filed Jun. 6, 2001, and claims priority on Finnish Application No. 20001352 filed Jun. 7, 2000, the disclosures of both of which applications are incorporated by reference herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCTFI01/00534 | 6/6/2001 | WO | 00 | 7/7/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO0194696 | 12/13/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4128053 | Kankaanpää | Dec 1978 | A |
4366752 | Koski | Jan 1983 | A |
5655442 | Conrad et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5669295 | Kayser et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5791242 | Kayser et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5911174 | Cramer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6666135 | Brendel et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6708608 | Viljanmaa | Mar 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
5-209394 | Aug 1993 | JP |
WO 0194696 | Dec 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040025719 A1 | Feb 2004 | US |