The invention relates to a method for protecting an electronic chip, a self-protected electronic chip, and also a method for producing the chip.
Electronic chips are being more and more extensively used, in particular in chip cards, as control means for financial operations, for controlling access or for checking identity. Increasingly frequent and sophisticated attempted frauds are leading chip card providers to enhance the safety of their cards.
Different types of protection have been developed taking various types of fraud into account. For example, swindlers can use observation of the electrical behavior of the chip, in particular the variations of its supply current, disassembly and/or direct observation of the circuit. Protection against attacks involving purely electrical observation is generally performed by software, for example by providing instructions which jam the messages (by adding bait switchings, for example). To prevent, or at least limit, the possibilities of direct observation of the circuit, the latter is generally located in a sealed casing.
It does however remain possible to open the protective casing of the circuit to observe its operation in detail and to understand and get round its protection means. To enhance safety, it has already been proposed to destroy the circuit as soon as an attempt to perform a physical intrusion is detected. This does however imply the following simultaneous conditions:
In known protection methods, destruction of the circuit is in particular achieved either by means of an electrical pulse, for example by using a fuse, or by activating explosive micro-charges. In all cases, a power source has to be embedded on the chip and an intrusion sensor has to be included in the casing. Such protective devices are complex and consequently expensive, and a risk of deactivation may remain, in particular in so far as the electric power source can discharge.
The object of the invention is to remedy these shortcomings and, more particularly, to provide an inexpensive method for protecting an electronic chip.
According to the invention, this object is achieved by the fact that at least a part of an electronic circuit of the chip is formed on a thin rigid membrane arranged between first and second cavities, normally at a substantially identical pressure that is much higher than atmospheric pressure, an attempted intrusion causing a reduction of the pressure in one of the cavities creating a pressure difference that breaks the membrane.
In a self-protected electronic chip according to the invention, at least a part of an electronic circuit of the chip is formed on a thin rigid membrane arranged between first and second cavities wherein the pressure is normally much higher than atmospheric pressure.
A method for producing a chip according to the invention comprises formation of at least one communication hole passing through the membrane, pressurizing of the first and second cavities connected via said communication hole, and sealing of said communication hole.
Other advantages and features will become more clearly apparent from the following description of particular embodiments of the invention given as non-restrictive examples only and represented in the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIGS. 2 to 5 illustrate the successive steps of a particular embodiment of a method for producing a self-protected chip according to the invention.
FIGS. 8 to 11 illustrate the successive steps of another particular embodiment of a method for producing a self-protected chip according to the invention.
According to the invention, protection of the electronic chip is achieved by destruction of at least a part of the electronic circuit comprised therein, without requiring either an intrusion sensor, or an embedded electric power source, or an electric circuit commanding destruction.
As represented in
An attempted intrusion, via the front face of the electronic chip, through the cover 5, or via the rear face thereof, through a substrate 6, automatically causes a leakage and consequently a sharp reduction of the pressure in one of the cavities 3 and 4. The membrane is then subjected to a large pressure difference, which has to be sufficient for the latter to break, thus causing destruction of the electronic circuit which it supports.
When the intrusion takes place, one of the cavities thus drops very quickly to atmospheric pressure, whereas the other cavity remains at the initial pressure, which is much higher than atmospheric pressure. In a preferred embodiment, the initial high pressure is about 10 bars, which leads for example, when an intrusion takes place, to a pressure difference of about 9 bars. The membrane 2 is preferably formed by a thin layer of silicon.
An order of magnitude of the thickness of the membrane 2 can be obtained from the following formula which applies in the case of a circular membrane:
T=3Pr2/8h2
in which T is the tensile strength or stress limit of the membrane, P the pressure difference applied on the membrane, r the radius of the membrane and h its thickness.
For example, for a diameter of 1 mm, an initial internal pressure of 10 bars in the cavities, i.e. a pressure difference of 9 bars in the event of an intrusion, and a tensile strength of 1 Gpa, the membrane must have a thickness of less than 12 μm to break.
A large number of other pressure, surface and membrane thickness combinations are naturally possible. In addition, certain zones of the membrane can be previously weakened, for example by etching weakening grooves when the chip is fabricated. It is moreover possible to limit the electronic circuit, arranged on the membrane 2 arranged between the two cavities 3 and 4, to certain sensitive parts only. Destruction of the membrane in the event of an intrusion then causes destruction of these sensitive parts, which is sufficient to prevent any observation and subsequent use of the chip.
The successive steps of a particular embodiment of a method for producing a self-protected chip are illustrated in FIGS. 2 to 5.
In
The first cavity 3 is then formed in two steps. First of all, as represented in
A first cavity 3 can thus be easily achieved that is sufficiently deep for the membrane 2 not to come up against the stop formed by the bottom of the cavity 3 before breaking, when an intrusion is made via the rear face of the chip (the pressure in the second cavity 4 remains high, whereas the pressure in the first cavity 3 decreases to atmospheric pressure and the membrane deforms in the rearward direction). In the previously described example (diameter of 1 mm, tensile strength of 1 Gpa, membrane thickness smaller than 12 μm), for a pressure difference of 9 bars, the deflection of the membrane is about 30 μm before breaking. The depth of the cavity 3, corresponding to the thickness of the silicon rear layer 10, therefore has to be greater than this value.
It is also desirable, when dimensioning the cavity 3, to take account of the pressure variation in this cavity due to deformation of the membrane 2 when an intrusion is made via the front face (the pressure in the second cavity 4 decreases to atmospheric pressure, whereas the first cavity 3 remains at a much higher pressure than atmospheric pressure and the membrane deforms in the frontward direction). The product PV of the pressure P in the cavity by the volume V of this cavity does in fact remain constant in the cavity 3, which does not present any leak. If this cavity is too thin, the increase of its volume V is, proportionally, quickly very large when deformation of the membrane takes place and the pressure in the cavity 3 decreases in the same proportions, quickly reducing the pressure difference exerted on the membrane. However, the method described above enables cavities having a depth of about 500 μm to be easily produced, which depth is more than 10 times larger than the deflection of the membrane, thus enabling this problem to be overcome.
Numerous other known fabrication techniques can be used to form the first cavity 3. This is in particular the case of circuit thinning and transfer techniques. The circuit can for example be stuck on a substrate and thinned before being transferred onto another substrate comprising the cavity.
As represented in
Several communication holes 11 can be provided and other solutions can be used to seal the communication holes 11. In an alternative embodiment, the communication holes can be closed off after the protective cover 5 has bee n sealed. This solution leaves more freedom in the choice of location of the communication holes 11. It is in particular possible to deposit a polysilicate glass (PSG) film on the membrane, for example by chemical vapor deposition (CVD), around the communication hole 11, and to perform a high-temperature heating step, after sealing of the protective cover 5 has been performed, resulting in creeping of the film and sealing of the communication hole by the crept glass. However, a material has to be used that creeps at a temperature comprised between the sealing temperature of the protective cover 5 and the maximum temperature able to be supported by the circuit 1, which may be difficult to achieve.
A passage with a low hydraulic conductance can be maintained between the cavities 3 and 4. This passage has to be sufficient to enable the pressures in the two cavities to be kept at equilibrium in the event of a slow variation of the pressures, but not in the event of a sharp variation of the pressure in one the cavities, so as to maintain the formation of a sufficient pressure difference to break the membrane in case of intrusion. The communication hole 11 can then be closed before the cover is sealed.
In a first alternative embodiment (not represented), the communication holes 11 are totally sealed and an additional or capillary hole having a very small diameter, preferably smaller than one micron, is formed in the membrane 2, for example by etching, next to the circuit 1. Such an alternative embodiment presents the advantage of being tolerant to dispersions due to the technology.
In a second alternative embodiment (not represented), the communication holes 11 are sealed by a sealing material that is sufficiently porous to enable the pressures in the first and second cavities 3 and 4 to be kept at equilibrium in the event of a slow variation of the pressures, for example during sealing of the protective cover, but not sufficiently porous to enable the pressures to be kept at equilibrium in the event of a sharp variation of the pressure in one the cavities. For example, the sealing material can be formed by polysilicate glass (PSG), which thus fills the communication holes 11 reducing the cross-section thereof without closing them completely.
In a third alternative embodiment, illustrated in
FIGS. 8 to 11 illustrate the successive steps of another particular embodiment of a method for fabricating a self-protected chip using the sacrificial layer technique.
In
As represented in
The first cavity 3, arranged under the membrane 2 and laterally delineated by the fillet 21, is then formed in the buried oxide layer 18, by etching of the buried oxide layer 18 through the communication hole(s) 11. The buried oxide layer 18 thereby acts, in this case, as sacrificial layer for formation of the first cavity 3.
In
In the embodiments illustrated in FIGS. 8 to 13, the thickness of the buried oxide layer 18 defines the depth of the first cavity 3. Dimensioning of the different elements of the chip has to take account of this depth and of the possible movement of the membrane 2. But the substrates 17 used in silicon on insulator technology do however commonly have a buried oxide layer 18 with a thickness of 3 μm. The membrane 2 then has to have a sufficiently small diameter to enable it to reach its yield limit before coming into contact with the bottom of the first cavity 3. With the same pressure of 10 bars as in the previous example, the diameter of the membrane then has to be less than or equal to 0.1 mm. It is then possible to only form a strategic part of the electronic circuit 2 on the membrane 2, i.e. a part which when destroyed makes it impossible to use the chip.
A membrane having a thickness of about 1.5 μm can then be used. Such a thickness, although envisageable, may be a little small to be able to fit the electronic circuit 1 therein. An alternative consists in using a thicker membrane with zones that have been previously weakened, for example by formation of weakening grooves in the membrane.
The front silicon layer 19 can for example be thickened by epitaxy so as to form an epitaxied silicon layer on the front silicon layer 19, in order to form a thicker membrane 2. This epitaxy is preferably performed before formation of the fillet 21. The fillet 21 and the communication holes 11 then pass through this epitaxied layer. Weakening grooves can then be formed in the membrane.
In an alternative embodiment illustrated in
At the same time, formation, as in
In the alternative embodiment illustrated in
In another alternative embodiment, the electronic circuit 1 is distributed over a plurality of elementary membranes that each bear a sensitive part of the electronic circuit.
In
Abutment pillars 32, also made of silicon nitride, can be optionally provided to secure the membrane above certain elementary cavities 28 (in the central part in
The invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described above. In particular, it is possible to combine distribution of the electronic circuit on elementary membranes and formation of weakening grooves. The latter can for example be formed above the peripheral fillet 29 or the anchoring fillets 30.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0410110 | Sep 2004 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR05/02312 | 9/19/2005 | WO | 2/23/2007 |