Ubiquitous remote access to services has become commonplace as a result of the growth and availability of broadband and wireless network access. As such, users are accessing services using an ever-growing variety of client devices (e.g., mobile devices, tablet computing devices, laptop/notebook/desktop computers, etc.). A remote server may communicate messages that contain data or other information between services and client devices over a variety of networks including, 3G and 4G mobile data networks, wireless networks such as WiFi and WiMax, wired networks, etc.
The services may be deployed on the same system node or computing device as an integrated remote access and application server, which also hosts a server remote access program to which client devices communicate. In other instances, services may be deployed on servers provided at different system nodes from the remote access server executing the server remote access program. While such environments provide deployment of large numbers of services, as well as a lighter weight installation and configuration process, there are problems associated with maintaining an operational statuses of such services at the remote access server.
Disclosed herein are systems and methods for providing unmanaged services with a keep-alive mechanism to determine if the unmanaged service is operational. In accordance with an aspect of the disclosure, there is provided a method for providing connection of a client to an unmanaged service in a client-server remote access system. The method may include registering the unmanaged service at a remote access server and creating a communication connection there between, the remote access server being configured for providing remote access to the unmanaged service by a client; receiving keep-alive messages at the remote access server from the unmanaged service over the communication connection; receiving a request at the remote access server for a client connection to the unmanaged service; and communicating a terminate keep-alive message from the remote access server to the unmanaged service to terminate the sending of keep-alive messages from the unmanaged service in response to the request for the client connection to the unmanaged service.
In accordance with other aspects of the disclosure, another method for providing a connection of a client to an unmanaged service in a client-server remote access system is disclosed. The method may include executing the unmanaged service at a first application server; opening a communication connection between the unmanaged service and a remote access server; providing information to a remote access server to register the unmanaged service at the remote access server, the remote access server being configured for providing remote access to the unmanaged service by a client; communicating keep-alive messages from the unmanaged service to the remote access server over the communication connection; and terminating the keep-alive messages from the unmanaged service in response to receiving an instruction.
In accordance with yet other aspects of the disclosure, an apparatus for providing a connection of a client to an unmanaged service in a client-server remote access system is disclosed. The apparatus may include a remote access server having a server layer that is a communications proxy for messages sent between the client and the unmanaged service, and an application server executing a service layer associated with the unmanaged service. The remote access server receives keep-alive messages from the unmanaged service over a communication connection, wherein the remote access server receives a request for a client connection to the unmanaged service. The remote access server may also communicate a terminate keep-alive message to the unmanaged service to terminate the sending of keep-alive messages from the unmanaged service in response to the request for the client connection to the unmanaged service.
In accordance with other aspects, there is provided a method for providing a connection of a client to an unmanaged service in a client-server remote access system. The method may include executing the unmanaged service at a first application server; opening a communication connection between the unmanaged service and a remote access server; providing initial headers information to a remote access server to register the unmanaged service at the remote access server, the remote access server being configured for providing remote access to the first unmanaged service by a client; communicating keep-alive messages from the unmanaged service to the remote access server over the communication connection; and terminating the keep-alive messages from the unmanaged service in response to a receiving an instruction request for a client connection at the remote access server.
Other systems, methods, features and/or advantages will be or may become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and/or advantages be included within this description and be protected by the accompanying claims.
The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale relative to each other. Like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present disclosure. While implementations will be described for remotely accessing services, it will become evident to those skilled in the art that the implementations are not limited thereto, but are applicable for remotely accessing any type of data or service via a remote device.
With the above overview as an introduction, reference is now made to
The remote access and application server 103 may include a server remote access program that executes in the server layer 114. The server remote access program is used to connect the client 102 to a managed service 115 (e.g., an application) executing in the service layer 116. By “managed service,” it is meant that remote access and application server 103 controls the application/process life cycle by starting and stopping the managed service 115 as clients connect and disconnect. For example, the managed service 115 may be a medical imaging application. Within the remote access and application server 103, the server remote access program in the server layer 114 may be connected to the service in the service layer 116 using a TCP socket connection and by, e.g., a system bus of the remote access and application server 103. Thus, bandwidth between the server remote access program and the service is extremely high. To provide additional services or application in the environment of
Referring now to
The communication connection 126 may be a TCP/IP communications network, a VPN connection, a dedicated connection, etc. Such environments provide for deployment of large numbers of services, as service deployment is not limited by the capabilities of the remote access and application server 103 of
In
In the environment of
The client 102 may connect to the unmanaged service 117 by connecting to the remote access server 104, as described above. In connecting to the remote access server 104, the client 102 may either connect to a specific instance of the queued service by using the application instanceId or connect to the first available queued service of a particular type using the application name. The remote access server 104 then facilitates the mechanics of connecting the client 102 to the queued service. Once the client is connected, the queued service is upgraded it to an “active service.” Additional clients may connect to the active services by using the unique application instanceId whereby the connected clients may collaborate together with the active service. Additional services may be provided by adding additional application servers 106 that each communicate to the remote access server 104 over respective communication connections 126. For example, a second (or more) application server 106 may be added to host a second (or more) unmanaged service 117.
In both
In accordance with aspects of the present disclosure, when an unmanaged service deployment is implemented as shown in
With reference to
However, the keep-alive messaging may cause problems if the client 102 connects to the unmanaged service 117 while the keep-alive messaging is being performed, as there will be two threads writing simultaneously to the server-service socket. In particular, once the client 102 is connected, the remote access server 104 starts a thread to read service responses from the server-service socket to send back to the client 102. Before this thread is started, the remote access server 104 needs to ensure the monitor thread 206 is shutdown so there is only one thread reading from the server-service socket at a time. Otherwise the monitor thread runs the risk of consuming a response intended for the client 120 which may break the client-service request/response protocol. The remote access server 104 also needs to ensure that the unmanaged service 117 has stopped sending keep-alive messages, which might otherwise be communicated to the client 112. Here, the client 102 would not know what to do with the keep-alive message.
Thus, in accordance with the present disclosure, the keep-alive messaging is shut down just before the client 102 connects to the unmanaged service 117. A handshake process may be implemented that takes place between the remote access server 104 and the unmanaged service 117 to shutdown the keep-alive messages in an orderly fashion when the client 102 is connecting, such that normal processing can proceed, i.e., the service input/output threads transition from sending keep-alive messages to receiving client input and sending service responses. In this manner, there is a handoff of one thread to another in the socket.
As shown in
The output thread 204 begins a loop at 426 where keep-alive messages are sent, the output thread 204 waits a configurable amount of time (e.g., 500 ms at 428) and determines if a stop sending keep-alives has been received (at 430, from the remote access server 104, described below). If the stop sending keep-alives has not been received, the loop returns to 426. If a stop sending keep-alives has been received, then the sending of keep-alive messages is stopped by the output thread 204 at 432. It is noted that the wait time at 428 is configurable and may be a time period other than 500 ms.
Concurrently with the above, the monitor thread 206 operates in a loop at 312 to start a timer at 314, read the keep-alive message from the output thread 204 (at 318) and cancel the timer at 320. This loop is performed during the period of time when the unmanaged service 117 is connected to the remote access server 104, but before a client connection is received. If the timer started at 314 expires before a keep-alive message is received, then at 316, the socket associated with the unmanaged service 117 is closed and the service is unregistered, as it is assumed the unmanaged service 117 has gone away.
Concurrent with the operation of the loop at 312, at 308, it may be determined by the remote access server 104 that a client is connecting to the remote access server 104 to remotely access the unmanaged service 117 (e.g., a connection from the client 102 at the URL of the remote access server 104). The determination at 308 may be determined at any time after the unmanaged service 117 connects to the remote access server 104 as shown in
The output thread 204, at 430, determines if a notification from the input thread 202 indicates to stop sending keep-alive messages. The output thread 204, upon receipt of the notification to stop sending keep-alive messages, stops at 432 and sends a “keep-alive=false” to the monitor thread 206. The output thread waits and then loops to process client requests (at 434) until the client disconnects. The remote access server 104 stops the monitor thread and sends an acknowledgement to the input thread 202 at 322, which is received at 408. The remote access server 104 completes the connection to the client 102 at 324. The input thread 202 loops to process client request (at 410) until the client disconnects.
Thus, the above is an example mechanism by which keep-alive messages may be communicated to a socket to determine that the unmanaged service 117 is responsive that also enables a client to connect to the same socket without creating confusion between the keep-alive messaging and the client connection process.
Numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations may be used. Examples of well-known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use include, but are not limited to, personal computers, servers, handheld or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, network personal computers (PCs), minicomputers, mainframe computers, embedded systems, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
Computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer may be used. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Distributed computing environments may be used where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network or other data transmission medium. In a distributed computing environment, program modules and other data may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
With reference to
Computing device 500 may have additional features/functionality. For example, computing device 500 may include additional storage (removable and/or non-removable) including, but not limited to, magnetic or optical disks or tape. Such additional storage is illustrated in
Computing device 500 typically includes a variety of tangible computer readable media. Computer readable media can be any available tangible media that can be accessed by device 500 and includes both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.
Tangible computer storage media include volatile and non-volatile, and removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Memory 504, removable storage 508, and non-removable storage 510 are all examples of computer storage media. Tangible computer storage media include, but are not limited to, RAM, ROM, electrically erasable program read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by computing device 500. Any such computer storage media may be part of computing device 500.
Computing device 500 may contain communications connection(s) 512 that allow the device to communicate with other devices. Computing device 500 may also have input device(s) 514 such as a keyboard, mouse, pen, voice input device, touch input device, etc. Output device(s) 516 such as a display, speakers, printer, etc. may also be included. All these devices are well known in the art and need not be discussed at length here.
It should be understood that the various techniques described herein may be implemented in connection with hardware or software or, where appropriate, with a combination of both. Thus, the methods and apparatus of the presently disclosed subject matter, or certain aspects or portions thereof, may take the form of program code (i.e., instructions) embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, or any other machine-readable storage medium wherein, when the program code is loaded into and executed by a machine, such as a computer, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the presently disclosed subject matter. In the case of program code execution on programmable computers, the computing device generally includes a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and at least one output device. One or more programs may implement or utilize the processes described in connection with the presently disclosed subject matter, e.g., through the use of an application programming interface (API), reusable controls, or the like. Such programs may be implemented in a high level procedural or object-oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the program(s) can be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language and it may be combined with hardware implementations.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/437,025, filed Feb. 20, 2017, entitled “METHOD FOR PROVIDING A CONNECTION OF A CLIENT TO AN UNMANAGED SERVICE IN A CLIENT-SERVER REMOTE ACCESS SYSTEM,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/534,274, filed Nov. 6, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,686,205, entitled “METHOD FOR PROVIDING A CONNECTION OF A CLIENT TO AN UNMANAGED SERVICE IN A CLIENT-SERVER REMOTE ACCESS SYSTEM,” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/910,189, filed Nov. 29, 2013, entitled “METHOD FOR SERVER-SERVICE SEPARATION WITH END-TO-END FLOW CONTROL IN A CLIENT-SERVER REMOTE ACCESS ENVIRONMENT,” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/944,720, filed Feb. 26, 2014, entitled “METHOD FOR PROVIDING A CONNECTION OF A CLIENT TO AN UNMANAGED SERVICE IN A CLIENT-SERVER REMOTE ACCESS SYSTEM.” The disclosures of the above are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4975690 | Torres | Dec 1990 | A |
5345550 | Bloomfield | Sep 1994 | A |
5491800 | Goldsmith et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5555003 | Montgomery et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5742778 | Hao et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5844553 | Hao et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870759 | Bauer et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5903725 | Colyer | May 1999 | A |
5909545 | Frese, II et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920311 | Anthias | Jul 1999 | A |
5978842 | Noble et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6045048 | Wilz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061689 | Chang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075531 | DeStefano | Jun 2000 | A |
6141698 | Krishnan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145098 | Nouri et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175869 | Ahuja et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6253228 | Ferris et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6343313 | Salesky et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6453334 | Vinson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453356 | Sheard et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6570563 | Honda | May 2003 | B1 |
6601233 | Underwood | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6792607 | Burd et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6909545 | Takano et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6918113 | Patel et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6938096 | Greschler et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6976077 | Lehew et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7028051 | McMullan | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7065568 | Bracewell et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069227 | Lintel, III et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7073059 | Worely et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7149761 | Cooke et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7167893 | Malone et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7174504 | Tsao | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181686 | Bahrs | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7240162 | de Vries | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7246063 | James et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7320131 | O'Toole, Jr. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7343310 | Stender | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7350151 | Nakajima | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7418711 | Lee et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7451196 | de Vries et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7577751 | Vinson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7620901 | Carpenter et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7647370 | Liu et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7650444 | Dirstine et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7656799 | Samuels et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7703024 | Kautzleben et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7706399 | Janczak | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7725331 | Schurenberg et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7802183 | Essin | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7831919 | Viljoen et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7886175 | Venable, Sr. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7921078 | McCuller | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7941488 | Goodman et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7966572 | Matthews et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8024523 | de Vries et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8261345 | Hitomi et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8356252 | Raman et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8359591 | de Vries et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8509230 | Vinson et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8527706 | de Vries et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8533103 | Certain et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8572178 | Frazzini et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8606952 | Pasetto et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8607158 | Molander et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8627081 | Grimen et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8910112 | Li et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8667054 | Tahan | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8832260 | Raja et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8924512 | Stoyanov | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9239812 | Berlin | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9686205 | Leitch | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9979670 | Leitch | May 2018 | B2 |
20010033299 | Callaway et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010047393 | Arner et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020032751 | Bharadwaj | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032783 | Tuatini | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032804 | Hunt | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020092029 | Smith | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030014735 | Achlioptas et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023670 | Walrath | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030065738 | Yang et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030120324 | Osborn et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120762 | Yepishin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030149941 | Tsao | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163514 | Waldschmidt | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030184584 | Vachuska et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208472 | Pham | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040015842 | Nanivadekar et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029638 | Hytcheson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039742 | Barsness et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040068516 | Lee et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106916 | Quaid et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117804 | Scahill et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040162876 | Kohavi | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040183827 | Putterman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040236633 | Knauerhase et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243919 | Muresan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249885 | Petropoulakis et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005024 | Samuels et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010871 | Ruthfield et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021687 | Anastassopoulos et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050050229 | Comeau et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050138631 | Bellotti et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050188046 | Hickman et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188313 | Matthews et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190203 | Gery et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216421 | Barry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240906 | Kinderknecht et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060004874 | Hutcheson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026006 | Hindle | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031377 | Ng et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031481 | Patrick et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036770 | Hosn et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060039359 | Pang | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060101397 | Mercer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060130069 | Srinivasan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060182141 | Duggirala | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060231175 | Vondracek et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060236328 | DeWitt | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060258462 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265689 | Kuznetsov et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271563 | Angelo et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060288171 | Tsien | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294418 | Fuchs | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070024645 | Purcell et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047535 | Varma | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067754 | Chen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079244 | Brugiolo | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070112880 | Yang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120763 | De Paepe et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130292 | Tzruya et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136677 | Agarwal | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070203944 | Batra et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203999 | Townsley | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208718 | Javid et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226636 | Carpenter et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233706 | Farber et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244990 | Wells | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256073 | Truong et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282951 | Selimis et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080134211 | Cui | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146194 | Yang et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159175 | Flack | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183190 | Adcox et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080313282 | Warila et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090044171 | Avadhanula | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090080523 | McDowell | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089742 | Nagulu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119644 | de Vries et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090198787 | Broda | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090209239 | Montesdeoca | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090217177 | DeGrazia | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090328032 | Crow et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100061238 | Godbole et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077058 | Messer | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100131591 | Thomas et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100150031 | Allen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174773 | Penner et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100205147 | Lee | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223566 | Holmes et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100223661 | Yang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268762 | Pahlavan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268813 | Pahlavan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281169 | Charles | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100281258 | Andress | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110138283 | Marston | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145863 | Alsina et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154464 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157196 | Nave et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110162062 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184993 | Chawla et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110213830 | Lopez et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219229 | Cholas | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110222442 | Cole et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110223882 | Hellgren | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246891 | Schubert et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252152 | Sherry et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264530 | Santangelo | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110314093 | Sheu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120008786 | Cronk | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011567 | Cronk | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120030275 | Boller et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120084713 | Desai et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120090004 | Jeong | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120133675 | McDowell | May 2012 | A1 |
20120151373 | Kominac et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154633 | Rodriguez | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120221792 | de Vries et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226742 | Momchilov et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245918 | Overton et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246225 | Lemire et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120296959 | Momchilov et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120324032 | Chan | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007227 | Hitomi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013671 | Relan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031618 | Momchilov | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130046815 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130046816 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054679 | Jooste | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130070740 | Yovin | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130086156 | McFadzean et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086652 | Kavantzas et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130113833 | Larsson | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117474 | Ajanovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132485 | Thomas et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138791 | Thomas et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130147845 | Xie et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159062 | Stiehl | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130179962 | Arai et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130212483 | Brakensiek et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130262566 | Stephure et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290408 | Stephure et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290856 | Beveridge et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130346482 | Holmes | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140136667 | Gonsalves et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140214925 | Thomas et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140240524 | Julia et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140298420 | Barton et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150026338 | Lehmann et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150067035 | Sullad et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150067769 | Barton et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150081764 | Zhao et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150163292 | Lemire et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150319252 | Momchilov et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160054897 | Holmes et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160226871 | Stephure et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160226979 | Lancaster et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160277495 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101539932 | Sep 2009 | CN |
101883097 | Nov 2010 | CN |
102129632 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102821413 | Dec 2012 | CN |
0349463 | Jan 1990 | EP |
1422901 | May 2004 | EP |
2007084744 | Mar 1995 | JP |
2002055870 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2004287758 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005031807 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005521946 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2008099055 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008263280 | Oct 2008 | JP |
4405812 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010238126 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2010256972 | Nov 2010 | JP |
2295752 | Mar 2007 | RU |
2298287 | Apr 2007 | RU |
2305860 | Sep 2007 | RU |
1998058478 | Dec 1998 | WO |
2001016724 | Mar 2001 | WO |
2002009106 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2003032569 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2003083684 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2010060206 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010088768 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010127327 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011087545 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2012127308 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2013024342 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013024343 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013109984 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013128284 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013153439 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2016120730 | Aug 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report, dated Nov. 5, 2018, received in connection with CN Patent Application No. 2014800642124 (English translation). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated May 31, 2016, received in connection International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/064243. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 19, 2015, received in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/064243. |
Coffman, Daniel, et al., “A Client-Server Architecture for State-Dependent Dynamic Visualizations on the Web,” IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, 2010, 10 pages. |
Fraser, N., “Differential Synchronization,” Google, Mountain View, CA, Jan. 2009, 8 pages. |
“GTK 3, Broadway and an HTML5 websocket gui, for free,” retrieved on Sep. 26, 2017 at http://compsci.ca/v3/viewtopic.php?t=36823, Apr. 12, 2014, pp. 1-3. |
Jourdain, Sebastien, et al., “ParaViewWeb: A Web Framework for 3D Visualization and Data Processing,” International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, vol. 3, 2011, pp. 870-877. |
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Microsoft Press, 5th Edition, Mar. 15, 2002, p. 624. |
Mitchell, J. Ross, et al., A Smartphone Client-Server Teleradiology System for Primary Diagnosis of Acute Stroke, Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 13, Issue 2, 2011, 12 pages. |
ParaViewWeb, KitwarePublic, retrieved on Jan. 27, 2014 from http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaViewWeb, 1 page. |
Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), retrieved on May 4, 2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Desktop_Protocol, 7 pages. |
Remote Desktop Services (RDS), Remote App, retrieved on May 4, 2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Desktop_Services, 9 pages. |
Remote Desktop Services (RDS), Windows Desktop Sharing, retrieved on May 4, 2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Desktop_Services, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180375785 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61944720 | Feb 2014 | US | |
61910189 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15437025 | Feb 2017 | US |
Child | 15984497 | US | |
Parent | 14534274 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 15437025 | US |