The side shields 40 are conformal to the pole 30. Thus, the thickness of the gap layer 20, t, does not vary in the down track direction. Similarly, the thickness of the gap layer 20 does not vary in a direction perpendicular to the ABS until the side shields 40 terminate at the throat height. Stated differently, the walls of the side shields 40 closest to the sidewalls of the pole 30 are substantially the same distance and have substantially the same profile as the pole 30.
Although the conventional transducer 10 may be used to write to media, there may be drawbacks at higher recording densities. At higher recording densities, the components 12, 20, 30 and 40 of the conventional transducer 10 are scaled to smaller sizes. As a result, the write field of the conventional pole 30 may be significantly reduced. In addition, the reverse overwrite loss may be increased. These developments are undesirable. Although these issues may be partially addressed by removal of the side shields 40, this is also undesirable. The side shields 40 are desired to prevent adjacent track interference and to mitigate wide track erasure that may be associated with a smaller side shield throat height.
Accordingly, what is needed is an improved transducer having a side shields.
A method and system provide a magnetic recording transducer having air-bearing surface (ABS). The magnetic recording transducer includes a pole, a side shield, a nonmagnetic gap between the side shield and the pole and at least one coil for energizing the pole. The pole has a pole tip proximate to the ABS. The side shield includes at least one nonconformal portion that extends from a throat height in a stripe height direction perpendicular to the ABS and is nonconformal with the pole. The spacing between the nonconformal portion(s) of the side shield and the pole varies based on a distance from the ABS.
The read transducer 102 includes soft magnetic shields 104 and 108 and a read sensor 106. The sensor 106 may be a giant magnetoresistive or tunneling magnetoresistive sensor. Although the second shield 108 of the read transducer 102 is shown as separate from the return pole 111, in some embodiments, these structures are merged.
The write transducer 110 includes optional return pole 111, main pole 130, optional leading edge shield 112, gap 120, coils 114, auxiliary pole 132, write gap 150 and return shield 160. As can be seen in
The side shields 140 include a high permeability material such as NiFe. In some embodiments, the side shields 140 may be an alloy and/or a multilayer. The side shields 140 are conformal to the pole in the down track direction. Thus, in the embodiment shown, the thickness of the side gap 120 is substantially constant for any plane parallel to the ABS. However, in other embodiments, the side shields 140 may not be conformal with the pole in the down track direction. For example, the side gap 120 may be thinner at the leading edge than at the trailing edge. Alternatively, the side gap 120 may be thicker at the leading edge than at the trailing edge. Although shown only as side shields 140, in other embodiments, the shields 140 may form a wraparound shield. Although not shown, a portion of the side shield(s) 140 that is not shown may extend in a direction perpendicular to the stripe height and down track directions.
Each of the side shields 140 includes at least one nonconformal portion. The embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown, the side shields 140 also have a conformal portion that extends from the ABS to the first throat height TH1. The conformal portion resides between the nonconformal portion of the side shields 140 and the ABS. Although only one nonconformal portion and one conformal portion is shown for each shield, one or more nonconformal portions and/or one or more conformal portions may be included in the side shields 140. Each nonconformal portion may adjoin another nonconformal portion having a different takeoff angle and/or may adjoin a conformal portion.
Use of the side shields 140 having nonconformal portions may improve the performance of the transducer 110 and thus the head 100. Because the side shields 140 are still present, adjacent track interference (ATI) and wide area track erasure (WATER) may be mitigated. The ability of the side shields to reduce ATI and WATER may be enhanced by the presence of the conformal region near the ABS. However, because the side shields 140 diverge from the pole 130 in the nonconformal regions, less of the magnetic field provided by the pole 130 is shielded from the media (not shown) by the side shields 140. Thus, a higher write field may be provided by the pole 130. In addition, the field gradient for the pole 130 may also be improved. Thus, performance of the transducer 110, particularly at higher recording densities may be improved.
The side shields 140′ are analogous to the side shields 140. Although shown only as side shields 140′, in other embodiments, the shields 140′ may form a wraparound shield. Although not shown, a portion of the side shield(s) 140′ that is not shown may extend in a direction perpendicular to the stripe height and down track directions.
The side shields 140′ include a conformal portion between the ABS and the first throat height TH1′ and a nonconformal portion between the first throat height and a second throat height TH2′. Thus, the spacing between the nonconformal portion of the side shields 140′ and the pole 130′ varies with distance from the ABS. In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
The transducer 110′ may share the benefits of the transducer 110. Use of the side shields 140′ having nonconformal portions may improve the performance of the transducer 110′ and thus the head 100′. Because the side shields 140′ are still present, ATI and WATER may be mitigated. The ability of the side shields 10′ to reduce ATI and WATER may be enhanced by the presence of the conformal region near the ABS. However, because the side shields 140′ diverge from the pole 130′ in the nonconformal regions, less of the magnetic field provided by the pole 130′ is shielded from the media (not shown) by the side shields 140′. Thus, a higher write field may be provided by the pole 130′. In addition, the field gradient for the pole 130′ may also be improved. Thus, performance of the transducer 110′, particularly at higher recording densities may be improved.
The side shields 140″ are analogous to the side shields 140 and 140′. Although shown only as side shields 140″, in other embodiments, the shields 140″ may form a wraparound shield. Although not shown, a portion of the side shield(s) 140″ that is not shown may extend in a direction perpendicular to the stripe height and down track directions.
The side shields 140″ are nonconformal to the pole. Stated differently, the first throat height (not shown) to which a conformal portion would extend is zero. The nonconformal portion thus extends from the ABS to the second throat height TH2″. The spacing between the side shields 140″ and the pole 130″ varies with distance from the ABS. In the embodiment shown in
The transducer 110″ may share the benefits of the transducers 110 and 110′. Use of the nonconformal side shields 140″ may improve the performance of the transducer 110″ and thus the head 100″. Because the side shields 140″ are still present, ATI and WATER may be mitigated. Because the side shields 140″ diverge from the pole 130″ in the nonconformal regions, less of the magnetic field provided by the pole 130″ is shielded from the media (not shown) by the side shields 140″. Thus, a higher write field may be provided by the pole 130″. In addition, the field gradient for the pole 130″ may also be improved. Thus, performance of the transducer 110″, particularly at higher recording densities may be improved.
The side shields 140′″ are analogous to the side shields 140, 140′ and 140″. However, in the embodiment shown, the shields 140′″ form a wraparound shield. In other embodiments, the shields 140′″ may be side shields only. Although not shown, a portion of the side shield(s) 140′″ that is not shown may extend in a direction perpendicular to the stripe height and down track directions.
The side shields 140′″ include a conformal portion between the ABS and the first throat height TH1′″ and a nonconformal portion between the first throat height and a second throat height TH2′″. An additional conformal portion is between the second throat height TH2′″ and a third throat height TH3. The spacing between the nonconformal portion of the side shields 140′″ and the pole 130′″ varies with distance from the ABS. In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown, the side shields 140′″ may be considered to include an additional nonconformal portion between widths W1 and W2. This portion of the side shields 140′″ is not conformal because this edge of the shield is parallel to the ABS rather than parallel to the sides of the pole 130′″. In another embodiment, this nonconformal portion of the side shields 140′″ may have another takeoff angle. Although a certain number of nonconformal portions and conformal portions are shown for each shield, another number of nonconformal portions and/or another number of conformal portions may be included in the side shields 140. Each nonconformal portion may adjoin another nonconformal portion having a different takeoff angle and/or may adjoin a conformal portion
The second throat height, which may also be the side shield depth, may be at least one hundred nanometers. In some embodiments, the second throat height is at least two hundred fifty and not more than five hundred nanometers. The first throat height is at least thirty nanometers. In some embodiments, the first throat height is at least sixty nanometers and not more than one hundred fifty nanometers. In some such embodiments, the first throat height is not more than sixty nanometers. In the embodiment shown, the side shields 140′″ also have a conformal portion that extends from the ABS to the first throat height TH1′″. The conformal portion resides between the nonconformal portion of the side shields 140′″ and the ABS.
The transducer 110′″ may share the benefits of the transducers 110, 110′ and 110″. Use of the side shields 140′″ having nonconformal portions may improve the performance of the transducer 110′″ and thus the head 100′″. Because the side shields 140′″ are still present, ATI and WATER may be mitigated. The ability of the side shields 140′″ to reduce ATI and WATER may be enhanced by the presence of the conformal region near the ABS. However, because the side shields 140′″ diverge from the pole 130′″ in the nonconformal regions, less of the magnetic field provided by the pole 130′″ is shielded from the media (not shown) by the side shields 140′″. Thus, a higher write field may be provided by the pole 130′″. In addition, the field gradient for the pole 130′″ may also be improved. Thus, performance of the transducer 110′″, particularly at higher recording densities may be improved.
The side shields 140″″ are analogous to the side shields 140, 140′, 140″ and 140′″. Although shown only as side shields 140″″, in other embodiments, the shields 140″″ may form a wraparound shield. Although not shown, a portion of the side shield(s) 140″″ that is not shown may extend in a direction perpendicular to the stripe height and down track directions.
The side shields 140″″ include a conformal portion between the ABS and the first throat height TH1″″ and a nonconformal portion between the first throat height and a second throat height TH2″″. An additional nonconformal portion is between the second throat height TH2″″ and a third throat height TH3′. The spacing between the nonconformal portions of the side shields 140″″ and the pole 130″″ varies with distance from the ABS. In the embodiment shown in
The third throat height, which may also be the side shield depth, may be at least one hundred nanometers. In some embodiments, the third throat height is at least two hundred fifty and not more than five hundred nanometers. The first throat height is at least thirty nanometers. In some embodiments, the first throat height is at least sixty nanometers and not more than one hundred fifty nanometers. In some such embodiments, the first throat height is not more than sixty nanometers. In the embodiment shown, the side shields 140′″ also have a conformal portion that extends from the ABS to the first throat height TH1′″. The conformal portion resides between the nonconformal portion of the side shields 140″″ and the ABS.
The transducer 110″″ may share the benefits of the transducers 110, 110′, 110″ and 110′″. Use of the side shields 140″″ having nonconformal portions may improve the performance of the transducer 110″″ and thus the head 100″″. Because the side shields 140″″ are still present, ATI and WATER may be mitigated. The ability of the side shields 140″″ to reduce ATI and WATER may be enhanced by the presence of the conformal region near the ABS. However, because the side shields 140″″ diverge from the pole 130″″ in the nonconformal regions, less of the magnetic field provided by the pole 130″″ is shielded from the media (not shown) by the side shields 140″″. Thus, a higher write field may be provided by the pole 130″″. In addition, the field gradient for the pole 130″″ may also be improved. Thus, performance of the transducer 110″″, particularly at higher recording densities may be improved.
A pole 130 is provided, via step 202. Step 202 may include plating or otherwise depositing material(s) for the pole 130. Step 130 may also include forming any leading and/or trailing edge bevels in the pole such that the pole is thinner in the down track direction than the yoke.
A nonmagnetic gap layer 120 is provided, via step 204. In some embodiments, step 204 may be performed before step 202. For example, if a portion of the gap 120 resides below the pole, then step 204 may be performed first.
The side shields 140 are provided, via step 206. Thus, step 206 may include depositing the materials for the side shield(s) 140. In addition, one or more masks may be used such that the side shield(s) 140 have one or more nonconformal regions. In some embodiments, the side shields 140 also have conformal region(s). In step 206, the desired throat height(s) and takeoff angles of the conformal and/or nonconformal portions of the side shields 140 are also formed. Thus, the side shields 140, 140′, 140″, 140′″ and/or 140″″ may be fabricated. The coils 114 are also provided, via step 208.
Thus, using the method 200, the transducer 110, 110′, 110″, 110′″, and/or 110″″ and head 100 may be fabricated. Further, characteristics of one or more of the transducers 110, 110′, 110″, 110′″ and/or 110″″ may be combined. Thus, performance and fabrication of the head 100 may be improved.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6504675 | Shukh et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6738223 | Sato et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6829819 | Crue, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6891697 | Nakamura et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6944938 | Crue, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6952325 | Sato et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7002775 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7070698 | Le | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7206166 | Notsuke et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7324304 | Benakli et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7367112 | Nix et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7467461 | Bonhote et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7508626 | Ichihara et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7649712 | Le et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7663839 | Sasaki et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7715152 | Okada et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7768743 | Guthrie et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7889456 | Jiang et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894159 | Lengsfield et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7898773 | Han et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7920359 | Maruyama et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7979978 | Han et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8015692 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8018677 | Chung et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8027125 | Lee et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8066892 | Guthrie et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8117738 | Han et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8120874 | Hsiao et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8125732 | Bai et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8136224 | Sun et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8136225 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8141235 | Zhang | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8149536 | Yang et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8164852 | Lee et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8166631 | Tran et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8166632 | Zhang et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8231796 | Li et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8262918 | Li et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8277669 | Chen et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8284517 | Sun et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8334093 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8341826 | Jiang et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8400731 | Li et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8404128 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8409453 | Jiang et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8419954 | Chen et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8456778 | Min et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8520336 | Liu et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
20030076630 | Sato et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040184191 | Ichihara et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050117251 | Matono et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060044681 | Le et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060044682 | Le et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067005 | Jayasekara | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060082924 | Etoh et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070253107 | Mochizuki et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080002309 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080151437 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080180861 | Maruyama et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080253035 | Han et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273276 | Guan | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080273277 | Guan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080278861 | Jiang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080304186 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090091861 | Takano | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090154019 | Hsiao et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090154026 | Jiang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090168241 | Mochizuki et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090279206 | Yang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100061016 | Han et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100146773 | Li et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100155363 | Pentek et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100254042 | Contreras et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100302681 | Mino et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110051293 | Bai et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110146060 | Han et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110151279 | Allen et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110222188 | Etoh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120012555 | Yan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120044598 | Bai et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Mallary et al., “One Terabit per Square Inch Perpendicular Recording Conceptual Design”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 38, No. 4, Jul. 2002, pp. 1719-1724. |