This invention relates to a system and method for the treatment of pelvic floor abnormalities, in particular female urinary incontinence.
Urinary incontinence is an involuntary release of urine when increases in abdominal pressure caused by sneezing, coughing, or exercising, for example, are not uniformly transmitted to the proximal urethra, resulting in urine “leakage.” Moderate urinary incontinence is inconvenient and can be a social and hygienic problem, while severe urinary incontinence can be disabling. Urinary incontinence occurs in women and is caused by for example, hypermobility of the bladder neck and proximal urethra (excessive downward and rotational movement of the bladder neck) or intrinsic sphincter deficiency.
Urinary incontinence affects a large number of women and, consequently, various approaches have been developed to treat female urinary incontinence. Those skilled in the art will be familiar with approaches ranging from pelvic floor exercises to surgical techniques such as Burch colposuspension and Stamey type endoscopic procedures in which the sutures are placed so as to elevate the bladder neck.
One known procedure positions a support, i.e., a sling loosely under the urethra. It is generally understood that this treatment alleviates urinary incontinence by occluding the mid-urethra (for example at a time of raised abdominal pressure by coughing or the like).
Problems associated with surgical correction of the failed support mechanisms include under-correction or over-correction. The surgeon must determine the degree of support necessary to properly elevate and support the urethra to properly address the urinary incontinence problem. This determination must be made both pre-, intra-, and post-operatively. Too little elevation causes urinary incontinence to remain, although the degree of incontinence may be reduced. Too much elevation can result in voiding dysfunction (reduced capacity or inability to void), leading to prolonged catheterization, and the need for postoperative correction.
The incidence of postoperative urinary retention due to post-operative obstruction can be high at several weeks after surgery, and a number of patients have post-operative urinary retention that persists. Symptomatic detrusor instability represents the bladder's response to increased outlet resistance caused by an improperly tensioned sling. The incidence of post-operative irritative symptoms secondary to detrusor instability can be unacceptably high. Appropriate tensioning of the suburethral support, i.e., sling minimizes persistent incontinence and voiding dysfunction. However, appropriate tensioning during surgery is difficult to assess and frequently is found to be excessive or insufficient once the patient has assumed normal posture and movement post-operatively. Methods and devices for immediate and short term post-operative adjustment of the tension in a suburethral support member, i.e., sling for the treatment of urinary incontinence are needed to mitigate the post-operative complications associated with inappropriate tensioning of the sling.
One of the problems identified and solved by the invention disclosed herein is that appropriate immediate and short-term post-operative tensioning of a suburethral support in a patient can minimize the discomfort, persistent incontinence and voiding dysfunction that often complicates prior art methods and devices for therapy of pelvic floor abnormalities including urinary incontinence. The invention described below relates to a system and method that permits fine tuning of a urethral support member, i.e., sling tension immediately post-operatively and for days up to a week rather than hours after the sling has been implanted in the patient.
Accordingly, at least one objective according to the invention described herein is to provide a system and method that mitigates the post-operative complications associated with under-tensioning or over-tensioning a suburethral sling implanted for the therapy of urinary incontinence or other pelvic floor dysfunctional or structural abnormalities.
In one aspect, the invention relates to a supplementary stabilization system for stabilizing the urethra. The stabilization system has a first elongate thread member and a second elongate thread member, each elongate thread member comprising an absorbable, flexible material having a length extending from a first end to a second end. In one embodiment, the second end of each thread member is free. The system for stabilizing the urethra also has a first stabilizer and a second stabilizer. In one embodiment, the first stabilizer is joined to the first end of the first elongate thread member. The second stabilizer is joined to the first end of the second elongate member thread member.
In one embodiment, the elongate thread members are non-porous, i.e., having no interstices such as pits, gaps or holes for cellular integration. The width of each elongate thread member is in the range of 0.1 to 2 mm.
The supplementary stabilization system also has a first and second suspending member and a support member. The support member has a first end and a second end. The first suspending member and the second suspending member each have a first end and a second end. The first end of each suspending member is joined to one of the first or second stabilizer. The second end of each suspending member is joined to either the first end or the second end of the support member.
In one embodiment, the support member has a length that is shorter than either of the first and second thread member. In one embodiment, the first thread member and the second thread member have a width that is in the range of about 0.8% to 20% of the width of the support member. Each of the thread first thread member and the second thread member may also have a length that is longer than the support member.
In a particular embodiment, the urethral support system has a tensioner. The tensioner includes a mechanism for including and retaining 1 or 2 thread members and a mechanism for tightening and loosening the urethral support member by mechanically exerting a linear or rotary force movement or by manual means.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a method for stabilizing a urethral support member under the urethra to treat urinary incontinence, for example. According to the method, a surgeon introduces a urethral support stabilization system including an absorbable first elongate member and an absorbable second elongate member having a first end and a second end, and the urethral support member through an incision in the vaginal wall. The first end of the system is introduced to the paraurethral space lateral to the urethra, through the subcutaneous tissue, and through the skin at a first location. The second end of the system is introduced in the paraurethral space on the other side of the urethra, through the subcutaneous tissue on that side of the urethra, and through the skin at a second location. In one embodiment the first and second locations are located on the skin of the abdomen. In another embodiment, the first and second locations are located on the perineal skin or the skin of the upper medial leg.
In an alternative method, the order of tissues through which the urethral support system passes is reverse of the order above.
In one embodiment, the urethral support stabilization system further includes a stabilizer connectable to an elongate member. The method further comprises positioning the stabilizer in soft tissue, for example, in the soft tissue of the retropubic space, the soft tissue of the perineal space, or the pre-pubic soft tissue. The stabilizer is located between an absorbable elongate member and the urethral support member. The length of the urethral support stabilization system between the stabilizer and the midpoint of the urethral support member is less than the distance between the patient's urethra and the skin at the first location. According to the invention, the stabilizer is positioned in pelvic soft tissue without penetrating the rectus sheath, in a vaginal to abdominal approach, or the subcutaneous tissue of the perineal skin in a vaginal to perineal approach or in the subcutaneous tissue of the pre-pubic skin in a vaginal to pre-pubic approach.
In one embodiment, the method of the invention further includes providing a tensioner to the surface of the abdominal perineal, or pre-pubic skin, as the case may be. The tensioner has a first and second end and is joined to the first and second elongate members, respectively, after the elongate members emerge from the skin. The method further includes adjusting the tension on the support member by adjusting the tensioner. At anytime up to ten days after the urethral support member is implanted in the patient, tension is applied to the second end of the elongate member at the first location. In one embodiment, the tension is applied manually by the surgeon. Alternatively, tension may be applied to the elongate member and transmitted to the urethral support member by mechanical means, for example, by a mechanical rotary or a linear force movement. The magnitude of the tension is sufficient to permit a remnant of the first end of the elongate member to retract under the skin after cutting the remnant. The first end of the elongate member is cut while it is under tension wherein the remnant of the first end retracts under the skin.
In one embodiment of the method of the invention, applying tension to one or the other elongate member comprises advancing or withdrawing one or the other stabilizer in the soft tissues of the patient. As used herein, withdrawing a stabilizer in the soft tissues of the patient means moving the stabilizer back along the path in which the stabilizer was advanced, i.e., in a reverse direction, without causing significant trauma to the soft tissue along the path and without applying more force, preferably less force, than the force that was required to advance the stabilizer.
These and other objects, along with advantages and features of the present invention herein disclosed, will become apparent through reference to the following description, the accompanying drawings, and the claims. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the features of the various embodiments described herein are not mutually exclusive and can exist in various combinations and permutations.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention disclosed herein, as well as the invention itself, will be more fully understood from the following description of preferred embodiments and claims, when read together with the accompanying drawings. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
Each of the first elongate member 22 and the second elongate member 22′ is longer or as long as the urethral support member 26 (described below in greater detail). Embodiments of the elongate member made from a monofilament lack the projecting ends of mesh, knitted, woven, or braided materials and therefore slide in soft tissue more easily forward (advancing) in one direction or backward (withdrawing) in the opposite direction. In one embodiment, each of the first elongate member 22 and the second elongate member 22′ includes a first end 30 and a second end 32. In one embodiment, the second end 32 is free while the first end 30 is joined to another part of the urethral support system 20.
Referring to
With continued reference to
The stabilizer 24 including the beads along the sides, described above, has at least one advantage over prior art stabilizers in that the stabilizer 24 may be reversibly transitioned in tissue, i.e., movement in tissues two-ways: (i) forward along the path of the respective elongate member to which the stabilizer 24 is joined, and (ii) back along the path already taken by the stabilizer 24. Accordingly, the stabilizer 24 permits positional fine-tuning by transitioning the stabilizer 24 forward or backwards, for example, by pulling in either direction during and after delivery of the urethral support system 20 in the patient's tissues. Moreover, the stabilizers of the supplementary stabilization system 10 aid in holding the urethral support member under the urethra in a correct position. In addition, the stabilizers according to the invention are not readily palpable, or may not be palpable transvaginally. The stabilizers and/or the supplementary stabilization system, according to the invention, are positioned in the soft tissue with adequate tensile strength to counter dislodging by, for example, coughing or straining, or by other instances of increased intra-abdominal pressure, until suitable integration of the patient's soft tissue occurs with the implanted urethral support member. Typically, the timeframe required for integration of the urethral support member is about 24 hours to about seven days.
The stabilizer according to the invention differs structurally and functionally from prior art devices because prior art devices are typically pronged, barbed, or have rough surfaces that, once drawn into soft tissue, cannot be withdrawn along the path already taken by the device. In contrast, the stabilizer according to the invention may be withdrawn along the tissue path already taken with minimal trauma to the soft tissue and allows forward and backward repositioning of the urethral support member. In particular, the stabilizer according to the invention permits adjustment to the tension of the urethral support member by transmitting the tension to the urethral support member through the stabilizer after the stabilizer is introduced into the patient's tissues. Because the stabilizer can be moved forward (advanced) and backward (withdrawn), tension transmitted to the urethral support member can be reduced as well as increased, a feature not present in prior art urethral support systems or methods for treating urinary incontinence.
Referring again to
Referring to
Each of the exemplary first suspending member 23 and second suspending member 23′ illustrated in
In another embodiment referring again to
It is preferable to space the strands as far as part as possible to allow blood to pass through the implant and reduce the mass of the implant, while providing the mesh with sufficient tensile strength and elasticity to be effective. It can therefore be appreciated that considerable variability in the maximum spacing between the strands can be achieved depending on the material from which the strands are comprised and the net pattern in which the strands are arranged.
In one embodiment the strands are arranged in a diamond net pattern, however any pattern which provides suitable tensile strength and elasticity may be used. For example a hexagonal net pattern may be used.
Ideally, in order to reduce the overall mass of the urethral support member, the strands should have as narrow a diameter as possible while still providing the mesh with suitable tensile strength and elasticity. The strands of the mesh include at least two filaments arranged to interact such that pores are formed between the filaments. The pores formed between the filaments are around about 50 to 200 microns, such a spacing allowing fibroblast through growth to occur. Fibroblast through growth secures the implant in place within the body. Additionally and importantly the suitably sized pores allow the implant to act as a scaffold to encourage the deposition of new patient tissue to promote integration of the urethral support member into the patient's soft tissues.
Suitable materials from which the mesh can be made are sufficiently inert to avoid foreign body reactions when retained in the human body for long periods of time and have suitably easy handling characteristics for placement under the urethra in the desired location in the body. The mesh can be easily sterilized to prevent the introduction of infection when the mesh is implanted in the human body.
For example, the filaments may be formed from any biocompatible material. In one embodiment, the filaments are formed from polyester, wherein each polyester filament is around 0.09 mm in diameter. Suitable materials of which the filaments may be formed also include polypropylene.
The filaments of the strands may be knitted together using warp knit to reduce the possibility of fraying of the filaments and strands. The fine warp knit of the filaments provides a urethral support member which is flexible in handling, which can be easily cut into different shapes and dimensions. As the strands are formed using warp knit, the possibility of fraying of the edge of the urethral support member following production or cutting of the mesh is reduced.
Other methods of reducing fraying of the filaments after cutting or production of the mesh include heat treatment, laser treatment or the like to seal the edges of the mesh.
The mesh may be supplied in any shape or size and cut to the appropriate dimensions as required.
It can be appreciated that cutting of the mesh will produce an unfinished edge. Due to the sparse nature of the strands that form the mesh and their narrow diameter, this unfinished edge does not suffer from the same problems as edges of meshes of the prior art.
In other words the edge produced is not rough and jagged such that it increases the likelihood of extrusion of the edge of the mesh in situ or the chance of infection.
An advantage of the mesh of the present invention is that it allows substantially less foreign material to be left into the body than conventional meshes for pelvic region repair.
However, to improve handling the mesh described above may be treated using an absorbable coating. The absorbable coating includes, for example, a layer of absorbable material having a thickness greater than that of the strands of the mesh. For example, the thickness of the layer of absorbable material may be around 1 to 2 mm. The strands of the mesh may be entirely embedded in the absorbable coating such that the outer surface of the mesh is covered entirely of the absorbable coating encasing the entire urethral support member.
Accordingly, in this embodiment, urethral support member has no gaps or holes on its surface to reduce the likelihood of bacteria becoming lodged on the strands of the mesh before implantation of the mesh. Furthermore, the absorbable coating makes the mesh more substantial and less flexible such that it is more easily handled by a surgeon.
In an alternative embodiment, the absorbable coating includes a layer of absorbable material applied to one face of the mesh, such that the mesh has a first face on which the absorbable material has been applied and a second face on which the absorbable material has not been applied such that the first and second faces and each have different characteristics.
It can also be envisaged that the surgical implant is provided with improved surgical handling qualities by a range of other methods. Such methods include the releasable attachment of the mesh to a backing strip.
The backing strip may be formed from plastics material and is adhered to the surgical implant using releasable adhesive.
In a similar fashion to the absorbable coating the backing strip causes the mesh to be more substantial and less flexible such that it is more easily handled by a surgeon. Following the suitable placement of the mesh the backing strip can be removed from the mesh, the mesh being retained in the body and the backing material being removed by the surgeon. Application of the backing strip to the mesh means the mesh benefits from reduced mass but that the mesh and backing strip together give characteristics required for surgical handling.
In a further embodiment, the filaments of the mesh may be comprised from bicomponent microfibres or composite polymers. These technologies provide the implant with dual phase technology.
The bicomponent microfibres comprise a core and surface material. The surface material may be resorbed by host tissues in a matter of hours, while the core material remains in the body for a longer period to enable tissue ingrowth.
Suitable bicomponent microfibres include a polypropylene non-absorable portion and a polylactic acid absorbable portion, for example.
The surface material is present during the surgical procedure when the mesh is being inserted and positioned in the soft tissues of the patient, and provides the mesh with characteristics desirable for surgical handling. Following implantation in the patient's body, typically a few hours, the surface material is absorbed by the body leaving only the core material of the filaments in the body. The core material of the filament has reduced foreign mass in comparison to meshes of the prior art or the mesh when it also includes the surface material.
The mesh of the urethral support member may be formed from composite polymers. As described for the bicomponent microfibres, composite polymers provide the urethral support implants with dual phase technology. A first face of the mesh has particular characteristics such as flexibility and elasticity, while a second face of the mesh provides the mesh with characteristics which improved the surgical handling of the mesh such as strength and robustness. The mesh results in an unfinished edge. This mesh is not as likely to cause the same problems as the rough and jagged edges of the of prior art mesh, due to the fewer strands, smaller diameter filaments and treatment of the mesh with absorbable coating which protects the tissue from the mesh during implantation when damage is most likely to occur.
In a further embodiment, the mesh has perimeter strands. Typically, the mesh is circular or the like in shape and thus the perimeter strand can be generally referred to as a circumferential strand. One strand runs around the circumference of the oval shape of the mesh. In another embodiment, several circumferential strands may be present, each circumferential strand may extend over one side of the oval mesh, i.e. around half the circumference of the mesh. In another embodiment, the circumferential strands arc arranged concentrically and each extends around the mesh at a different radial location.
An outer circumferential strand extending around the perimeter of the mesh, and further circumferential strands are arranged inwardly of the outer circumferential strand forming a perimeter spaced by a distance. The distance between adjacent circumferential members, can vary and in this example is 20 mm.
Transverse strands extend from the centre of the oval mesh to points on the perimeter of the mesh. In this example, four transverse strands are provided across the diameter of the mesh, dividing the mesh into eight angularly equal portions.
The mesh of this embodiment may be formed from materials as previously described. Depending on the material chosen the mesh may be woven, knitted or extruded as one piece, or individual or groups of strands can be extruded separately and joined to one another.
In another embodiment, meshes may have angled sides. A mesh according to this embodiment has a similar structure to that described above. However, the mesh has a perimeter member having angled sides. Further it may have transverse members arranged only to extend towards the perimeter of the mesh, rather than all being across the diameter of the mesh. This provides a more uniform structure. More specifically, the mesh has a transverse member extending along its axis of symmetry, a transverse member bisecting the axis of symmetry, and four further transverse members extending from the axis of symmetry to the perimeter of the mesh.
In addition to the pores provided by the combination of filaments which form the strands, pores can be provided by rings of polypropylene positioned at the intersection of the circumferential and transverse members.
Alternatively the pores may be formed by the spacing of the transverse members, such that pores of a size 50 to 200 microns suitable for enabling tissue ingrowth between the transverse members.
With continued reference to
Referring still to
Referring to
The exemplary tensioner 50 illustrated in
At each end of the tensioner 50 illustrated in
As an alternative to the embodiment of the tensioner 50 described above, an adhesive may be used alone or in concert with the holes for attaching the second end 32 of the elongate member 22 to the tensioner 50. In yet another embodiment, the tensioner 50 may include only one hole 52.
Referring to
Referring now to
In one aspect, the invention relates to a kit for treatment of urinary incontinence. In one embodiment, the kit includes a urethral support stabilization system. The urethral support stabilization system includes a first and second elongate member, a first and second stabilizer and optionally a urethral support member, for example a mesh sling. In one embodiment, each of the elongate members comprise an absorbable, non-porous material, without interstices that would permit cellular ingrowth. In another embodiment, each of the stabilizers comprise a substantially planar member with multiple radii, i.e., beads as described above projecting from the edge of the planar surface. The stabilizer may further feature a throughhole at one end. In another embodiment, the kit of the invention may further include a tensioner including a hole for pinching the end of an elongate member or an adhesive for adhering to an elongate member.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a method for providing urethral support in a patient, such as, for the therapy of female urinary incontinence, and/or uterovaginal prolapse, for example. Referring to
In one embodiment, the first stabilizer 24 is positioned in the soft tissue of the retropubic space 112, while the elongate member 22 emerges from the abdominal skin 106. The first stabilizer 24 is positioned in the retropubic space, i.e., it does not pass through any of the intervening tissues i.e., rectus sheath, subcutaneous tissue and skin, between the retropubic space and the skin surface.
The first end 40 of the urethral support member 26 is pre-attached to the first stabilizer 24. Alternatively, the first end 40 of the urethral support member 26 is attachable and detachable to the first stabilizer 24 during the surgical procedure. A portion of the urethral support member 26, for example, a first portion extending from approximately the mid-point to one end of the urethral support member, is positioned on the side of the urethra 114 through which the first elongate member 22 passed.
This procedure is repeated with the second elongate member 22′, second stabilizer 24′, and the support member 26 on the other side of the urethra 114. As with the first stabilizer 24, the second stabilizer 24′ is positioned in the retropubic space but at a location different than the first stabilizer 24. The second stabilizer 24′ does not pass through any of the intervening tissues i.e., rectus sheath, subcutaneous tissue and skin, between the retropubic space and the skin surface. Following introduction of the second elongate member 22′ and the second stabilizer 24′, the remaining urethral support member 26 is positioned under the urethra 114 with one end of the support member on one side of the urethra 114 and the other end of the support member on the other side of the urethra 114.
In one embodiment, the first stabilizer 24 and the second stabilizer 24′ cannot extend into the intervening tissues between the retropubic space and the skin surface largely because the length of the urethral support member 26 from its midpoint under the urethra to one end of the urethral support member and the length of the suspending member, if one is used, that is positioned on one side of the urethral support member to which the stabilizer is connected, is shorter than the distance between the urethra and the rectus sheath.
Referring to
Referring to
In another embodiment, the surgeon takes a vaginal to perineal approach. The perineum corresponds to the outlet of the pelvis inferior to the pelvic diaphragm (levator ani and coccygeus). The boundaries of the perineum are provided by the pubic arch and the arcuate ligament of the pubis, the tip of the coccyx and on either side of the inferior rami of the pubis and ischium, and the sacrotuberous ligament. A line joining the anterior parts of the ischial tuberosities divides the perineum into two portions, the posterior anal triangle portion and the smaller anterior urogenital triangle.
In the vaginal to perineal approach, referring now to
The first stabilizer 24 is positioned in the soft tissues of the perineal space 110 while the elongate member 22 emerges from the perineal skin 150. The first stabilizer 24 is positioned in the soft tissue of the perineal space 110, i.e., the first stabilizer 24 does not pass through the skin.
The first end 40 of the support member 26 is pre-attached to the first stabilizer 24. Alternatively, the first end 40 of the support member 26 is attachable and detachable to the first stabilizer 24 during the surgical procedure. The support member 26 is positioned on the side of the urethra 114 through which the first elongate member 22 passed.
Referring to
In one embodiment, the first stabilizer 24 and the second stabilizer 24′ cannot extend into the intervening tissue between the perineal space and the skin surface because the length of the urethral support member from its midpoint on one side of the urethra to one end of then urethral support member and the length of the suspending member, if one is used, is less than the distance between the urethra and the perineal skin. Typically, for the vaginal to perineal approach the length of the urethral support member from its midpoint on one side of the urethra and the suspending member on the same side of the urethra, if one is used, is in the range of about 3 to 6 cm, preferably 4 cm.
Following the emergence of the second elongate member 22′ at a second perineal skin location, the position of the urethral support member 26 under the urethra is adjusted and stabilized by applying tension to one or the other of the first 22 and second elongate member 22′, or both. Tension may be applied manually, i.e., by hand without mechanical aids or by a system that includes mechanical aids such as by mechanically applying rotary or linear force movement, and further, may measure and or regulate the applied tension. As discussed above, the tension is transmitted from the elongate members to the first and second stabilizers 24, 24′. For example, applying tension such as by pulling the second end 32 of the first elongate member 22, the first stabilizer 24 advances through the soft tissue while the second stabilizer 24′ is withdrawn through the soft tissue along the path already taken by the second stabilizer 24′.
A first tensioner 50 is joined to the free end 32 of the first elongate member 22 of the supplementary stabilization system 10 that emerges through the perineal skin at a first location. A second tensioner 50 is joined to the free end 32′ of the second elongate member 22′ of the supplementary stabilization system 10 emerging through the perineal skin at a second location. The tension of the urethral support member 26 is adjusted by applying tension to the first elongate member 22 and the second elongate member 22′.
In one embodiment, the skin locations may be on the medial aspect of the thighs.
In another embodiment of the method of the invention, the stabilizers 24, 24′ are positioned in the pre-pubic soft tissue and the ends 32 of the first and second elongate members 22, 22′ emerge through the pre-pubic skin.
Alternatively, the route through tissues can be reversed, for example, for an abdominal to vaginal approach, the urethral support system would pass through tissues in the following order, abdominal skin at a first location, subcutaneous tissue, rectus sheath, retropubic space, suburethral space, and finally, through the vaginal incision. These steps would be repeated on the other side starting at a second abdominal skin location.
For a perineal to vaginal approach, the urethral system would pass through tissues in the following order, perineal skin at a first location, subcutaneous perineal tissue, perineal muscles, suburethral space and finally through a vaginal incision. The steps would be repeated on the other side starting at a second perineal skin location.
Regardless of the surgical approach, according to the invention, intra-operative and post operative adjustment of the urethral support member, for example by adjusting the tension applied to the urethral support member, may be performed for up to one week, preferably 72 hours after surgery. For example, in one embodiment of the method, the tensioner 50 is left in place for 1 to 7 days following implantation of the urethral support member 26. The ends 32 of the first and second elongate members 22, 22′ emerging through the abdominal wall, perineal skin, or pre-pubic skin as the case may be, are transected after first applying tension to the free ends 32, 32′ to pull a portion of the elongate members 22, 22′ adjacent to the free end from below the skin, through the skin, to the skin surface. The portion of the elongate member that was below the skin is cut so that the remnant of the elongate member after cutting that was under tension retracts back under the skin. The same procedure is repeated with the elongate member emerging at the second abdominal, perineal, or pre-pubic location, as the case may be. The one or more tensioners are removed from the patient.
In a particular embodiment of the method of the invention, the vaginal incision is closed, e.g., by suturing followed by adjustment of the tension of the urethral support member by transmitting tension from the elongate members through the stabilizers to the urethral support member.
This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 14/740,276 filed Jun. 16, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 14/151,873 filed Jan. 10, 2014 and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,089,394, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/402,978 filed Feb. 23, 2012 and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,668,635, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/072,901 filed Feb. 28, 2008 and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,167,785. Priority to each of the foregoing is claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1450101 | Mathewson | Mar 1923 | A |
2097018 | Chamberlin | Oct 1937 | A |
2427176 | Aldeen | Sep 1947 | A |
2738790 | Todt Sr. et al. | Mar 1956 | A |
3054406 | Usher | Sep 1962 | A |
3124136 | Usher | Mar 1964 | A |
3126600 | De Marre | Mar 1964 | A |
3182662 | Shirodkar | May 1965 | A |
3311110 | Singerman et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3384073 | Van Winkle, Jr. | May 1968 | A |
3472232 | Pendleton | Oct 1969 | A |
3580313 | McKnight | May 1971 | A |
3763860 | Clarke | Oct 1973 | A |
3789828 | Schulte | Feb 1974 | A |
3858783 | Kapitanov et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3888975 | Ramwell | Jun 1975 | A |
3911911 | Scommegna | Oct 1975 | A |
3913179 | Rhee | Oct 1975 | A |
3913573 | Gutnick | Oct 1975 | A |
3916899 | Theeuwes et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3924633 | Cook et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3993058 | Hoff | Nov 1976 | A |
3995619 | Glatzer | Dec 1976 | A |
4019499 | Fitzgerald | Apr 1977 | A |
4037603 | Wendorff | Jul 1977 | A |
4128100 | Wendorff | Dec 1978 | A |
4172458 | Pereyra | Oct 1979 | A |
4233968 | Shaw, Jr. | Nov 1980 | A |
4235238 | Ogiu et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4246660 | Wevers | Jan 1981 | A |
4409866 | McBride | Oct 1983 | A |
4441497 | Paudler | Apr 1984 | A |
4444933 | Columbus et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4452245 | Usher | Jun 1984 | A |
4509516 | Richmond | Apr 1985 | A |
4632100 | Somers et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4633873 | Dumican et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4646731 | Brower | Mar 1987 | A |
4655221 | Devereux | Apr 1987 | A |
4769038 | Bendavid et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4775380 | Seedhom et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4784139 | Demos | Nov 1988 | A |
4799484 | Smith et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4857041 | Annis et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4865031 | O'Keeffe | Sep 1989 | A |
4873976 | Schreiber | Oct 1989 | A |
4911164 | Roth | Mar 1990 | A |
4920986 | Biswas | May 1990 | A |
4938760 | Burton et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5004468 | Atkinson | Apr 1991 | A |
5013292 | Lemay | May 1991 | A |
5053043 | Gottesman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5085661 | Moss | Feb 1992 | A |
5112344 | Petros | May 1992 | A |
5123428 | Schwarz | Jun 1992 | A |
5123910 | McIntosh | Jun 1992 | A |
5149329 | Richardson | Sep 1992 | A |
5188636 | Fedotov | Feb 1993 | A |
5207694 | Broome | May 1993 | A |
5209756 | Seedhom et al. | May 1993 | A |
5219352 | Atkinson | Jun 1993 | A |
5234436 | Eaton et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5250033 | Evans et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5256133 | Spitz | Oct 1993 | A |
5259835 | Clark et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5281237 | Gimpelson | Jan 1994 | A |
5306279 | Atkinson | Apr 1994 | A |
5328077 | Lou | Jul 1994 | A |
5336239 | Gimpelson | Aug 1994 | A |
5337736 | Reddy | Aug 1994 | A |
5342376 | Ruff | Aug 1994 | A |
5356432 | Rutkow et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5362294 | Seitzinger | Nov 1994 | A |
5368595 | Lewis | Nov 1994 | A |
5383904 | Totakura et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386836 | Biswas | Feb 1995 | A |
5397353 | Oliver et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403328 | Shallman | Apr 1995 | A |
5413598 | Moreland | May 1995 | A |
5434146 | Labrie et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5439467 | Benderev et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5456711 | Hudson | Oct 1995 | A |
5473796 | Fusillo | Dec 1995 | A |
5474543 | McKay | Dec 1995 | A |
5486197 | Le et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5507754 | Green et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507796 | Hasson | Apr 1996 | A |
5520700 | Beyar et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522896 | Prescott | Jun 1996 | A |
5544664 | Benderev et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549619 | Peters et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5562685 | Mollenauer et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562689 | Green et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569273 | Titone et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571139 | Jenkins, Jr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591163 | Thompson | Jan 1997 | A |
5611515 | Benderev et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5628756 | Barker, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633286 | Chen | May 1997 | A |
5645568 | Chervitz et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5647836 | Blake, III et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655270 | Boisvert | Aug 1997 | A |
5669935 | Rosenman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5683349 | Makower et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689860 | Matoba et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693072 | McIntosh | Dec 1997 | A |
5695525 | Mulhauser et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697931 | Thompson | Dec 1997 | A |
5697978 | Sgro | Dec 1997 | A |
5720766 | Zang et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5749884 | Benderev et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766221 | Benderev et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774994 | Stein et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5807403 | Beyar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5816258 | Jervis | Oct 1998 | A |
5830220 | Wan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836314 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836315 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840011 | Landgrebe et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842478 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851229 | Lentz et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860425 | Benderev et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5899909 | Claren et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904692 | Steckel et al. | May 1999 | A |
5919232 | Chaffringeon et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922026 | Chin | Jul 1999 | A |
5934283 | Willem et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935122 | Fourkas et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944732 | Raulerson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954057 | Li | Sep 1999 | A |
5971967 | Willard | Oct 1999 | A |
5972000 | Beyar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5988171 | Sohn et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990378 | Ellis | Nov 1999 | A |
5997554 | Thompson | Dec 1999 | A |
6005191 | Tzeng et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010447 | Kardjian | Jan 2000 | A |
6030393 | Corlew | Feb 2000 | A |
6031148 | Hayes et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039686 | Kovac | Mar 2000 | A |
6042534 | Gellman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042536 | Tihon et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042583 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048306 | Spielberg | Apr 2000 | A |
6048351 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050937 | Benderev | Apr 2000 | A |
6053935 | Brenneman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056688 | Benderev et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063094 | Rosenberg | May 2000 | A |
6068591 | Bruckner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071290 | Compton | Jun 2000 | A |
6074341 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077216 | Benderev et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090116 | D'Aversa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106545 | Egan | Aug 2000 | A |
6110101 | Tihon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117067 | Gil Vernet | Sep 2000 | A |
6159207 | Yoon | Dec 2000 | A |
6162962 | Hinsch et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168611 | Rizvi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174329 | Callol et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190401 | Green et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197036 | Tripp et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200330 | Benderev et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221005 | Bruckner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221060 | Willard | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231496 | Wilk et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245082 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264676 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267772 | Mulhauser et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273852 | Lehe et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287316 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292700 | Morrison et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302840 | Benderev | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306079 | Trabucco | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319264 | Tormala et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328686 | Kovac | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328744 | Harari et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334446 | Beyar | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6336731 | Chien | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352553 | van der Burg et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355065 | Gabbay | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6382214 | Raz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387041 | Harari et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406423 | Scetbon | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406480 | Beyar et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408656 | Ory et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418930 | Fowler | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440154 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6443964 | Ory et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461332 | Mosel et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475139 | Miller | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478727 | Scetbon | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6478791 | Carter et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482214 | Sidor, Jr. et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491703 | Ulmsten | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494887 | Kaladelfos | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494906 | Owens | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502578 | Raz et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6506190 | Walshe | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6527802 | Mayer | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530943 | Hoepffner et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544273 | Harari et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6575897 | Ory et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6575998 | Beyar | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6582443 | Cabak et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592515 | Thierfelder et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596001 | Stormby et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599235 | Kovac | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599318 | Gabbay | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599323 | Melican et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6612977 | Staskin et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6638210 | Berger | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638211 | Suslian et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638284 | Rousseau et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641524 | Kovac | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6641525 | Rocheleau et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652450 | Neisz et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652595 | Nicolo | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6666817 | Li | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669706 | Schmitt et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669735 | Pelissier | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673010 | Skiba et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6675483 | Bond et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6679896 | Gellman et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6689047 | Gellman | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691711 | Raz et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695855 | Gaston | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6702827 | Lund et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6737371 | Planck et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6755781 | Gellman | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764474 | Nielsen et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6783554 | Amara et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786861 | Pretorius | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6830052 | Carter et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6860887 | Frankle | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6878756 | Cinelli et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6884212 | Thierfelder et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6911003 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6932759 | Kammerer et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936052 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6953428 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960160 | Browning | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7025063 | Snitkin et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7063716 | Cunningham | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7070556 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7070558 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087065 | Ulmsten et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7094199 | Petros et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112171 | Rocheleau et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112210 | Ulmsten et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7131943 | Kammerer | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7131944 | Jacquetin | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7140956 | Korovin et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7156858 | Schuldt Hempe et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7204802 | De Leval | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7229404 | Bouffier | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7288063 | Petros et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7290410 | Meneghin et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297102 | Smith et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7326213 | Benderev et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7347812 | Mellier | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7371245 | Evans et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7387634 | Benderev | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395822 | Burton et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7404819 | Darios et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7410460 | Benderev | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7500945 | Cox et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7517313 | Thierfelder et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7527633 | Rioux | May 2009 | B2 |
7559885 | Merade et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7594921 | Browning | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601118 | Smith et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611454 | De Leval | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7614258 | Cherok et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621864 | Suslian et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7628156 | Astani et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7673631 | Astani et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7686760 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691050 | Gellman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7713188 | Bouffier | May 2010 | B2 |
7722528 | Arnal et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740576 | Hodroff et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7766926 | Bosley, Jr. et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789821 | Browning | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7794385 | Rosenblatt | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7815662 | Spivey et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7927342 | Rioux | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7975698 | Browning | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7981022 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8007430 | Browning | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8016741 | Weiser et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8016743 | Maroto | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8047983 | Browning | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8092366 | Evans | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8097007 | Evans et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8100924 | Browning | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8118727 | Browning | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8118728 | Browning | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8123673 | Browning | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8128554 | Browning | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8157821 | Browning | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8157822 | Browning | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8162818 | Browning | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8167785 | Browning | May 2012 | B2 |
8182412 | Browning | May 2012 | B2 |
8182413 | Browning | May 2012 | B2 |
8182545 | Cherok et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8215310 | Browning | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8273011 | Browning | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8449450 | Browning | May 2013 | B2 |
8454492 | Browning | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8469875 | Suslian et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8469877 | Browning | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8512223 | Browning | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8574148 | Browning et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8603119 | Browning | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8603120 | Browning | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8632554 | Browning | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8668635 | Browning | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8709471 | Browning | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8801596 | Browning | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8821369 | Browning | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8821370 | Browning | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8852075 | Browning | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9005222 | Evans et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
20010000533 | Kovac | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20010018549 | Scetbon | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010039423 | Skiba et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049467 | Lehe et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010049538 | Trabucco | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010051815 | Esplin | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053916 | Rioux | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020005204 | Benderev et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007222 | Desai | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020022841 | Kovac | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020028980 | Thierfelder et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042658 | Tyagi | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049503 | Milbocker | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052612 | Schmitt et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020052653 | Durgin | May 2002 | A1 |
20020052654 | Darois et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020055748 | Gellman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058959 | Gellman | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068948 | Stormby et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072694 | Snitkin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077526 | Kammerer et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078964 | Kovac et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082619 | Cabak et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083949 | James | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091298 | Landgrebe | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091373 | Berger | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099258 | Staskin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099259 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099260 | Suslian et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103542 | Bilbo | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107430 | Neisz et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107525 | Harari et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115906 | Miller | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119177 | Bowman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128670 | Ulmsten et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138025 | Gellman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147382 | Neisz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151762 | Rocheleau et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151909 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151910 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156487 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156488 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161382 | Neisz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020183588 | Fierro | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188169 | Kammerer et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188301 | Dallara et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004395 | Therin | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009181 | Gellman et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023136 | Raz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023137 | Gellman | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023138 | Luscombe | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036676 | Scetbon | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050530 | Neisz et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065246 | Inman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030065402 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069469 | Li | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078468 | Skiba et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100954 | Schuldt Hempe et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030130670 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149440 | Kammerer et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030171644 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030176762 | Kammerer | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030176875 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191360 | Browning | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199732 | Suslian et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212305 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220538 | Jacquetin | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040029478 | Planck et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034373 | Schuldt Hempe et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039453 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059356 | Gingras | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040097974 | De Leval | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106847 | Benderev | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040144395 | Evans et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172048 | Browning | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040231678 | Fierro | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243166 | Odermatt et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249240 | Goldmann et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249373 | Gronemeyer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249397 | Delorme et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249473 | Delorme et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050000524 | Cancel et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004576 | Benderev | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050065486 | Fattman | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080317 | Merade | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107805 | Bouffier et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131274 | Suslian et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050240076 | Neisz et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050277806 | Cristalli | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278037 | Delorme et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283040 | Greenhalgh | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015069 | Evans et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025649 | Smith et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025783 | Smith et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041185 | Browning | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058578 | Browning | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089524 | Chu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089525 | Mamo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060130848 | Carey | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060205995 | Browning | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060264698 | Kondonis et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070015953 | MacLean | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020311 | Browning | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032695 | Weiser | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032881 | Browning | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070059199 | Labuschagne | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070149555 | Kase et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070219606 | Moreci et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080021263 | Escude et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080161837 | Toso et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080161850 | Weisenburgh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167518 | Burton et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080196729 | Browning | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200751 | Browning | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080281148 | Evans et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090123522 | Browning | May 2009 | A1 |
20090137862 | Evans et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090171377 | Intoccia et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090221868 | Evans | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090287229 | Ogdahl | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100022822 | Walshe | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100056856 | Suslian et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063351 | Witzmann et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100113869 | Goldman | May 2010 | A1 |
20100130814 | Dubernard | May 2010 | A1 |
20100198002 | O'Donnell | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222794 | Browning | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222974 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256442 | Ogdahl et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274074 | Khamis et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280308 | Browning | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100298630 | Wignall | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110021868 | Browning | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110034759 | Ogdahl et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110105833 | Gozzi et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110124954 | Ogdahl et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110124956 | Mujwid et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110201872 | Browning | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110230705 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230708 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230709 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237865 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237866 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237867 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237868 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237869 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237870 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237873 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237874 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237875 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237876 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237877 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237878 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237879 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238095 | Browning | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245594 | Browning | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282136 | Browning | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110319705 | Browning | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319706 | Browning | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120083649 | Suslian et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120083651 | Browning | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116154 | Evans et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143000 | Browning | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120149977 | Browning | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120199133 | Browning | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130281775 | Browning | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289340 | Browning | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289341 | Browning | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140039244 | Browning | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140039247 | Browning | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140039248 | Browning | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140051917 | Browning | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140303429 | Evans et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140303430 | Evans et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2592617 | Feb 2004 | CA |
2305815 | Aug 1974 | DE |
4220283 | Dec 1993 | DE |
4304353 | Apr 1994 | DE |
10019604 | Jun 2002 | DE |
10211360 | Oct 2003 | DE |
0009072 | Apr 1980 | EP |
0024781 | Aug 1984 | EP |
0024780 | Oct 1984 | EP |
0248544 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0437481 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0139286 | Aug 1991 | EP |
0470308 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0556313 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0557964 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0632999 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0650703 | May 1995 | EP |
0706778 | Apr 1996 | EP |
0740925 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0745351 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0778749 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0854691 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0983033 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1093758 | Apr 2001 | EP |
0719527 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1151722 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1159921 | Dec 2001 | EP |
0643945 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1342454 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1545285 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1060714 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1274370 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1296614 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1353598 | Oct 2007 | EP |
0797962 | Sep 2009 | EP |
1274370 | Oct 1961 | FR |
2712177 | May 1995 | FR |
2732582 | Oct 1997 | FR |
2735015 | Feb 1998 | FR |
2811218 | Nov 2000 | FR |
2787990 | Apr 2001 | FR |
0378288 | Aug 1932 | GB |
2353220 | Feb 2001 | GB |
4452180 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2187251 | Aug 2002 | RU |
2196518 | Jan 2003 | RU |
1225547 | Apr 1986 | SU |
1342486 | Oct 1987 | SU |
1475607 | Apr 1989 | SU |
1990003766 | Apr 1990 | WO |
1991000714 | Jan 1991 | WO |
1993017635 | Sep 1993 | WO |
1993019678 | Oct 1993 | WO |
1995033454 | Dec 1995 | WO |
1996003091 | Feb 1996 | WO |
1996006567 | Mar 1996 | WO |
199706567 | Feb 1997 | WO |
1997013465 | Apr 1997 | WO |
1997022310 | Jun 1997 | WO |
1997043982 | Nov 1997 | WO |
1998019606 | May 1998 | WO |
1998035606 | Aug 1998 | WO |
1998035616 | Aug 1998 | WO |
1998035632 | Aug 1998 | WO |
1998057590 | Dec 1998 | WO |
1999016381 | Apr 1999 | WO |
1999052450 | Oct 1999 | WO |
1999059477 | Nov 1999 | WO |
2000007520 | Feb 2000 | WO |
2000013601 | Mar 2000 | WO |
2000015141 | Mar 2000 | WO |
2000018319 | Apr 2000 | WO |
2000018325 | Apr 2000 | WO |
2000027304 | May 2000 | WO |
2000038784 | Jul 2000 | WO |
2000057812 | Oct 2000 | WO |
2000064370 | Nov 2000 | WO |
2000066030 | Nov 2000 | WO |
2000074594 | Dec 2000 | WO |
2000074613 | Dec 2000 | WO |
2000074633 | Dec 2000 | WO |
2001006951 | Feb 2001 | WO |
2001026581 | Apr 2001 | WO |
2001039670 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2001045589 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2001052729 | Jul 2001 | WO |
2001052750 | Jul 2001 | WO |
2001056499 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2001080773 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2002002031 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2002019946 | Mar 2002 | WO |
2002026108 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2002028312 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2002028315 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2002030293 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2002032284 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2002032346 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2002034124 | May 2002 | WO |
2002039890 | May 2002 | WO |
2002039914 | May 2002 | WO |
2002058562 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2002058563 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2002058564 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2002058565 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2002060371 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2002062237 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2002065921 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2002065922 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2002065923 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2002065944 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2002069781 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2002071931 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2002071953 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2002078548 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2002078552 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2002078568 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2002078571 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2002098322 | Dec 2002 | WO |
2002098340 | Dec 2002 | WO |
2003002027 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2003013369 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2003013392 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2003057074 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2003068107 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2003075792 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2003022260 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2003086205 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2003092546 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2003094781 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2003096928 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2003096930 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004002370 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004002379 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004004600 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004012626 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004016196 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004019786 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004012579 | May 2004 | WO |
2004098461 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005018494 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005112842 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006015031 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006015042 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006136625 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007059199 | May 2007 | WO |
2007149555 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008007086 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008018494 | Feb 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ulmsten et al., “The unstable female urethra,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1982, 144:93-97. |
Ulmsten, “Female Urinary Incontinence—A Symptom, Not a Urodynamic Disease. Some Theoretical and Practical Aspects on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence,” Int. Urogynecol. J., 1995, 6:2-3. |
Ulstem et al., “A Multicenter Study of Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT) for Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence,” Int. Urogynecol. J., 1998, 9:210-213. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,994, filed Jun. 1, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/327,160, filed Oct. 4, 2001. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/106,086, filed Mar. 25, 2002. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/199,061, filed Aug. 8, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/279,794, filed Mar. 29, 2001. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/302,929, filed Jul. 3, 2001. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/307,836, filed Jul. 25, 2001. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/322,309, filed Sep. 14, 2001. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/362,806, filed Mar. 7, 2002. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/380,797, filed May 14, 2002. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/393,969, filed Jul. 5, 2002. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/402,007, filed Aug. 8, 2002. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/414,865, filed Sep. 30, 2002. |
Webster and Kreder, “Voiding Dysfunction Following Cystourethropexy: Its Evaluation and Management,” J. Urol., 1990, 144:670-673. |
Weidemann, Small Intestinal Submucosa for Pubourethral Sling Suspension for the Treatment of Stress Incontinence: First Histopathological Results in Humans, Jul. 2004. |
Winter, “Peripubic Urethropexy for Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women,” Urology, 1982, 20(4):408-411. |
Woodside and Borden, “Suprapubic Endoscopic Vesical Neck Suspension for the Management of Urinary Incontinence in Myelodysplastic Girls,” J. Urol., 1986, 135:97-99. |
Written Opinion for PCT/GB2009/050174, dated Jun. 24, 2009. |
Written Opionion issued in PCT/GB2007/002589, dated Jan. 22, 2008, 5 pages. |
Zacharin and Hamilton, “Pulsion Enterocele: Long-Term Results of an Abdominoperineal Technique,” Obstet. Gynecol., 1980, 55(2):141-148. |
Zacharin, “The suspensory mechanism of the female urethra,” J. Anat., 1963, 97(3):423-427. |
Abdel-fattah, Mohamed et al. Evaluation of transobturator tapes (E-TOT) study: randomised prospective single-blinded study comparing inside-out vs. outside-in transobturator tapes in management of urodynamic stress incontinence: Short term outcomes, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (2009). |
Accelerated Examination Search for Surgical Implant—Abutment System and Method, Mar. 31, 2011, 10 pages. |
Accelerated Examination Search for Surgical Implant—Adjustable, Mar. 4, 2011, 10 pages. |
Accelerated Examination Search for Surgical Implant—Fiber Entanglement, Mar. 4, 2011, 8 pages. |
Accelerated Examination Search for Surgical Implant—Introducer, Mar. 31, 2011, 12 pages. |
Adjustable Mini-Sling, Just-Swing SVS “Secured Vaginal Sling”, Polypropylene, Mar. 2010. |
Ajust Adjustable Single-Incision Sling, http://www.bardnordic.com, Mar. 1, 2011. |
Ajust(TM) Adjustable Single-Incision Sling, retrieved from www.bardnordic.com/main/product.asp?sectionTypeId=2§ion, accessed Mar. 1, 2011, 1 page. |
Aldridge, “Transplantation of Fascia for Relief of Urinary Stress Incontinence,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1942, 44:398-411. |
Amended Answer and Counterclaim (Mar. 30, 2004) American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Mentor Corporation, Civ. No. 03-5759. |
American Heritage Dictionary, 2nd College Edition (1991). |
AMS's Reply to Mentor's Counterclaim (Apr. 5, 2004) American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Mentor Corporation, Civ. No. 03-CV-5759. |
Answer and Counterclaim (Mar. 15, 2004) American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Mentor Corporation, Civ. No. 03-5759. |
Answer and Counterclaim of American Medical Systems, Inc. (Mar. 11, 2004) Mentor Corporation v. American Medical Systems, Inc., Civ. Case No. 04-1000 DWF/SRN. |
Araki et al., “The Loop-Loosening Procedure for Urination Difficulties After Stamey Suspension of the Vesical Neck,” J. Urol., 1990, 144:319-323. |
Asmussen and Ulmsten, “Simultaneous Urethro-Cystometry with a New Technique,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1976, 10:7-11. |
Beck and McCormick, “Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence with Anterior Colporrhaphy,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982, 59(3):271-274. |
Benderev, “A Modified Percutaneous Outpatient Bladder Neck Suspension System,” J. Urol., 1994, 152:2316-2320. |
Benderev, “Anchor Fixation and Other Modifications of Endoscopic Bladder Neck Suspension,” Urology, 1992, 40(5):409-418. |
Bergman and Elia, “Three surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: Five-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1995, 173:66-71. |
BioArc SP Sling Kit, www.AmericanMedicalSystems.com, 2006. |
BioArc(R) SP Sling Kit: 12 Step Procedure, American Medical Systems Inc. Online Brochure 2006, 2 pages. |
Blaivas and Jacobs, “Pubovaginal Fascial Sling for the Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence,” J. Urol., 1991, 145:1214-1218. |
Blaivas and Salinas, “Type III Stress Urinary Incontinence: Importance of Proper Diagnosis and Treatment,” American College of Surgeons Surgical Forum, 1984, 70.sup.th Annual Clinical Congress, San Francisco, CA, vol. XXXV, pp. 473-474. |
Botros, Cystocele and Rectocele Repair: More Success With Mesh? Jun. 2006. |
Bryans, “Marlex gauze hammock sling operation with Cooper's ligament attachment in the management of recurrent urinary stress incontinence,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1979, 133(3):292-294. |
Burch, “Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper's ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocele, and prolapse,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1961, 81(2):281-290. |
Canepa, G. et al., “Horseshoe-shaped Marlex mesh for the treatment of pelvic floor prolapse,” European Urology (Jan. 2001) 39 (Supl 2): 23-27. |
Certified priority document for GB Application No. 0025068.8, filed Oct. 12, 2000, 38 pages. |
Certified priority document for GB Application No. 0208359.0, filed Apr. 11, 2002, 50 pages. |
Certified priority document for GB Application No. 0411360.1, filed May 21, 2004, 31 pages. |
Chen, Biologic Grafts and Synthetic Meshes in Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Jun. 2007. |
Choe and Staskin, “Gore-Tex Patch Sling: 7 Years Later,” Urology, 1999, 54:641-646. |
Chopra et al., “Technique of Rectangular Fascial Sling,” Female Urology, 1996, Raz (ed.), W.B. Saunders Company, Chapter 34, pp. 392-394. |
Churchill's Medical Dictionary (1989). |
Complaint and Jury Demand (Feb. 8, 2010), Coloplast A/S v. Mpathy Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV10-206. |
Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (Oct. 28, 2003) American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Mentor Corporation. |
Complaint for Patent Infringement (Feb. 20, 2004) Mentor Corporation v. American Medical Systems, Inc. |
Complaint for Patent Infringement and Exhibits (Feb. 8, 2010) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV10-227 BHS. |
Cook, Urogynecology, Product Technical Datasheet and Order form, 1996. |
D. Elliott Declaration and Attachment 1 (Jan. 5, 2011) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV 10-227 BHS. |
Dargent, D. et al., Pose d'un ruban sous uretral oblique par voie obturatrice dans le traitement de L'incontinence urinary feminine [English “Insertion of a transobturator oblique suburethral sling in the treatment of female urinary incontinence”], Gynecol. Obstet. Ferril. 14, pp. 576-582 (2002) [including English translation at the beginning of document]. |
Das and Palmer, “Laparoscopic Colpo-Suspension,” J. Urol., 1995, 154:1119-1121. |
De Leval, J., “Novel Surgical Technique for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Continence: Transobturator Vaginal Tape Inside-Out,” European Urology, 2003, 44:724-730. |
DeBord, James R., (1998), “The Historical Development of Prosthetics in Hernia Surgery,” Surgical Clinics of North America, 78(6): 973-1006. |
Declaration of Dr. George D. Webster in Support of Generic Medical Devices, Inc.'s Briefing on Claim Construction and Exhibits for Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV 10-227 BHS, signed Jan. 5, 2011. |
Declaration of Jeya Paul and Attachment 1 (Jan. 10, 2011) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV 10-227 BHS. |
Declaration of Marc Belloli in Support of GMD's Opening Claim Construction Brief and Exhibits A-J (Jan. 10, 2011) Coloplast A/S v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV 10-227 BHS. |
Decter, “Use of the Fascial Sling for Neurogenic Incontinence: Lessons Learned,” J. Urol., 1993, 150:683-686. |
Delmore, E. et al., La bandelette trans-obturatrice: Un procede mini-invasif pour traiter l'incontinence urinaire d'effort de la femme, Progres en Urologie, vol. 11, pp. 1306-1313 (2001) [including English translation at the beginning of document]. |
Kovac, R. S. Follow-Up of the Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling for Recurrent Urinary Incontinence (Kovac Procedure). Journal of Pelvic Surgery, 5(3): 156-160, 1999. |
Kovac, R., et. al. Pubic Bone Suburethral Stablization Sling for Recurrent Urinary Incontinence. Obstetrics & Genecology: Instruments & Methods, 89(4): 624-627, Apr. 1997. |
Lazarevski, M.B., Suburethral Duplication of the Vaginal Wall—An Original Operation for Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women, 6 Int'l Urogynecol. J. 73-79 (1995). |
Leach et al., “Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel Summary Report on Surgical Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence,” J. Urol., 1997, 158:875-880. |
Leach, “Bone Fixation Technique for Transvaginal Needle Suspension,” Urology, 1988, 31(5):388-390. |
Lichtenstein et al., “The Tension-Free Hernioplasty,” Am. J. Surgery, 1989, 157:188-193. |
Lipton, S. and Estrin, J., “A Biomechanical Study of the Aponeurotic Iguinal Hernia Repair,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Jun. 1994, vol. 178, pp. 595-599. |
Loughlin et al., “Review of an 8-Year Experience with Modifications of Endoscopic Suspension of the Bladder Neck for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence,” J. Urol., 1990, 143:44-45. |
Maher, Surgical Management of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse: An Evidence Based Literature Review, 2006. |
Mahoney and Whelan, “Use of Obturator Foramen in Iliofemoral Artery Grafting: Case Reports,” Annals of Surgery, 1966, 163(2):215-220. |
Marshall et al., “The Correction of Stress Incontinence by Simple Vesicourethral Suspension,” J. Urol., 2002, 168:1326-1331. |
McGuire and Gormley, “Abdominal Fascial Slings,” Female Urology, 1996, Raz (ed.), W.B. Saunders Company, Chapter 31, pp. 369-375. |
McGuire and Lytton, “Pubovaginal Sling Procedure for Stress Incontinence,” J. Urol., 1978, 119:82-84. |
McGuire et al., “Experience with Pubovaginal Slings for Urinary Incontinence at the University of Michigan,” J. Urol., 1987, 138:525-526. |
McGuire, “Abdominal Procedures for Stress Incontinence,” Urologic Clinics of North America, 1985, 12(2):285-290. |
McIndoe et al., “The Aldridge Sling Procedure in the Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence,” Aust. NZ J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1987, 27:238-239. |
McKiel, Jr. et al., “Marshall-Marchetti Procedure: Modification,” J. Urol., 1966, 96:737-739. |
Migliari, R. et al., “Tension-Free Vaginal Mesh Repair for Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse,” European Urology (2000) 38(2): 151-155. |
Miklos, Mini Sling Incontinence Treatment—Vagina Plastic Surgery, http://www.miklosandmoore.com/mini_sling.php, Feb. 28, 2011. |
MiniArc Single-Incision Sling http://www.americanmedicalsystems.com Mar. 4, 2011. |
Moir, “The Gauze-Hammock Operation,” The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, 1968, 75(1):1-9. |
Monseur, J., Anatomie Chirurgicale: Les Ligaments Du Perinee Feminin, Sep. 4, 2008. |
Moore et al. “Single-Center Retrospective Study of the Technique, Safety, and 12 Month Efficacy or the MiniArc™ Single Incision Sling: A New Minimally Invasive Procedure for Treatment of Female SUI” [Online] 2009, 18, pp. 175-181. |
Morgan et al., “The Marlex sling operation for the treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence: A 16-year review,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1985, 151:224-226. |
Morgan, “A sling operation, using Marlex polypropylene mesh, for treatment of recurrent stress incontinence,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1970, 106(3):369-376. |
Narik and Palmrich, “A simplified sling operation suitable for routine use,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1962, 84:400-405. |
Nichols, “The Mersilene Mesh Gauze-Hammock for Severe Urinary Stress Incontinence,” Obstet. Gynecol., 1973, 41(1):88-93. |
Nicita, Giulio, (1998), “A New Operation for Genitourinary Prolapse,” The Journal of Urology, 160:741-745. |
Nickel et al., “Evaluation of a Transpelvic Sling Procedure With and Without Colpolsuspension for Treatment of Female Dogs With Refractory Urethral Sphincter Mechanism Incompetence,” Veterinary Surgery, 1998, 27:94-104. |
Norris et al., “Use of Synthetic Material in Sling Surgery: A Minimally Invasive Approach,” J. Endocrinology, 1996, 10(3):227-230. |
Novak, “Abdonomovaginal Techniques,” Gynecological Surgical Technique, 1977, Piccin Editore, Padua, 5 pages. |
O'Donnell, “Combined Raz Urethral Suspension and McGuire Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence,” J. Arkansas Medical Society, 1992, 88(8):389. |
Order dismissing cases (Sep. 16, 2004) Civ. No. 03-5759 and Civ. No. 04-1000. |
Parker, MC and Phillips, RK, “Repair of rectocoele using Marlex mesh,” Ann R Coll Surg Engl (May 1993) 75(3):193-194. |
Parra and Shaker, “Experience with a Simplified Technique for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence,” British Journal of Urology, 1990, 66:615-617. |
Pelosi II and Pelosi III, “New transobturator sling reduces risk of injury,” OBG Management, 2003, pp. 17-37. |
Pelosi III and Pelosi. Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling: Laparoscopic Assessment of a Transvaginal Operation for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques: 9(1): 45-50, 1999. |
Penson and Raz, “Why Anti-incontinence Surgery Succeeds or Fails,” Female Urology, 1996, Raz (ed.), W.B. Saunders Company, Chapter 41, pp. 435-442. |
Pereyra et al., “Pubourethral Supports in Perspective: Modified Pereyra Procedure for Urinary Incontinence,” Obstet Gynecol., 1982, 59:643-648. |
Petros and Konsky, “Anchoring the midurethra restores bladder-neck anatomy and continence,” The Lancet, 1999, 354:997-998. |
Petros and Ulmsten, “An analysis of rapid pad testing and the history for the diagnosis of stress incontinence,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1992, 71:529-536. |
Petros and Ulmsten, “An Anatomical Basis for Success and Failure of Female Incontinence Surgery,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1993, (Suppl. 153):55-60. |
Petros and Ulmsten, “Bladder Instability in Women: A Premature Activation of the Micturition Reflex,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, 1993, 12:235-239. |
Petros and Ulmsten, “Cough Transmission Ratio: An Indicator of Suburethral Vaginal Wall Tension Rather than Urethral Closure?” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1990, 69(Suppl. 153):37-38. |
Petros and Ulmsten, “Cure of Stress Incontinence by Repair of External Anal Sphincter,” Acta. Obstet. Gynecol Scand., 1990, 69(Suppl. 153):75. |
Petros and Ulmsten, “Cure of Urge Incontinence by the Combined Intravaginal Sling and Tuck Operation,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1990, 69(Suppl. 153)61-62. |
Petros and Ulmsten, “Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS III—(with midline “tuck”),” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory and its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence: 69-71 , 1993. |
Petros and Ulmsten, “Non Stress Non Urge Female Urinary Incontinence—Diagnosis and Cure: A Preliminary Report,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1990, 69(Suppl. 153):69-70. |
Petros and Ulmsten, “Part I: Theoretical, Morphological, Radiographical Correlations and Clinical Perspective,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1993, Suppl. 153:5-28. |
Petros and Ulmsten, “Part II:The Biomechanics of Vaginal Tissue and supporting Ligaments with Special Relevance to the Pathogenesis of Female Urinary Incontinence,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1993, Suppl. 153:29-40. |
DeTayrac, et al. Prolapse repair by vaginal route using . . . Int. Urogynecol. J. (published online May 13, 2006). |
Dwyer, Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Aug. 2004. |
Enzelsberger et al., “Urodynamic and Radiologic Parameters Before and After Loop Surgery for Recurrent Urinary Stress Incontinence,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1990, 69:51-54. |
Eriksen et al., “Long-Term Effectiveness of the Burch Colposuspension in Female Urinary Stress Incontinence,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1990, 69:45-50. |
Falconer et al., “Clinical Outcome and Changes in Connective Tissue Metabolism After Intravaginal Slingplasty in Stress Incontinent Women,” Int. Urogynecol. J., 1996, 7:133-137. |
Falconer et al., “Influence of Different Sling Materials on Connective Tissue Metabolism in Stress Urinary Incontinent Women,” Int. Urogynecol. J., 2001, (Suppl. 2):S19-S23. |
Generic Medical Devices, Inc 's Answer to Complaint and Counterclaims (Mar. 1, 2010) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV10-227 BHS. |
Generic Medical Devices, Inc.'s Non, Infringement and Invalidity Contentions and Accompanying Document Production (Aug. 9, 2010) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV-10-227 BHS. |
Generic Medical Devices, Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief (Jan. 10, 2011) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV10-227 BHS. |
Gilja et al., “A Modified Raz Bladder Neck Suspension Operation (Transvaginal Burch),” J. Urol., 1995, 153:1455-1457. |
Gittes and Loughlin, “No-Incision Pubovaginal Suspension for Stress Incontinence,” J. Urol., 1987, 138:568-570. |
Gruss, “The Obturator Bypass. Indications. Techniques. Outcomes,” Chirurgie, 1971, 97:220-226. |
Guida and Moore, “The Surgeon At Work. Obturator Bypass Technique,” Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1969, pp. 1307-1315. |
Handa et al., “Banked Human Fascia Lata for the Suburethral Sling Procedure: A Preliminary Report,” Obstet. Gynecol., 1996, 88:1045-1049. |
Hardiman, et al. Cystocele repair using polypropylene mesh. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 107: 825-26 (2000). |
Henriksson and Ulmsten, “A urodynamic evaluation of the effects of abdominal urethrocystopexy and vaginal sling urethroplasty in women with stress incontinence,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1978, 131:77-82. |
Hodgkinson and Kelly, “Urinary Stress Incontinence in the Female. III. Round-ligament technique for retropubic suspension of the urethra,” Obstet. Gynecol., 1957, 10:493-499. |
Hohenfellner and Petri, “Sling Procedures,” Surgery of Female Incontinence, 2nd edition, SpringerVeriag, pp. 105-113, 1986. |
Holschneider et al., “The Modified Pereyra Procedure in Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 15-Year Review,” Obstet. Gynecol., 1994, 83:573-578. |
Horbach et al., “A Suburethral Sling Procedure with Polytetrafluoroethylene for the Treatment of Genuine Stress Incontinence in Patients with Low Urethral Closure Pressure,” Obstet. Gynecol., 1988, 71:648-652. |
Horbach, “Suburethral Sling Procedures,” Urogynecology and Urodynamics—Theory and Practice, 1996, Williams & Wilkins, pp. 569-579. |
Ingelman-Sundberg and Ulmsten, “Surgical Treatment of Female Urinary Stress Incontinence,” Contr. Gynec. Obstet., 1983, 10:51-69. |
International Preliminary Examination Report issued in PCT/GB01/04554, completed Nov. 22, 2002, 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Examination Report issued in PCT/GB2002/001234, completed Jul. 1, 2003, 18 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/GB2004/001390, dated Sep. 3, 2004, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US03/24212, dated May 28, 2004, 11 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/GB2009/050174, dated Jun. 24, 2009. |
International Search Report issued in PCT/GB01/04554, dated Jan. 29, 2002, 3 pages. |
International Search Report issued in PCT/GB2002/01234 dated Jun. 5, 2002, 3 pages. |
International Search Report issued in PCT/GB2007/002589, dated Jan. 22, 2008, 5 pages. |
Jacquetin, Bernard, “2. Utilisation du “TVT” dans la chirurgie de l'incontinence urinaire feminine”, J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 29: 242-47 (2000). |
Jeffcoate, “The Results of the Aldridge Sling Operation for Stress Incontinence,” The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Empire, 1956, 63:36-39. |
Jeter, “The Social Impact of Urinary Incontinence,” Female Urology, Raz (ed.), W. B. Saunders Company, 1996, Chapter 7, pp. 80-86. |
Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 132 and Appendix A (Nov. 15, 2010) Coioplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV10-227 BHS. |
Just-Swing(R) Adjustable mine-sling, Textile Hi-Tec Online Brochure 2010, 4 pages. |
Karram and Bhatia, “Patch Procedure: Modified Transvaginal Fascia Lata Sling for Recurrent or Severe Stress Urinary Incontinence,” Obstet Gynecol., 1990, 75:461-463. |
Kennelly et al. “Prospective Evaluation of a Single Incision Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence” The Journal of Urology [Online] 2010, 184, pp. 604-609. |
Kerdiles et al., “Bypass via the Obturator Foramen in Reconstructive Arterial Surgery of the Lower Extremities,” Ann. Chir. Thorac. Cardio-Vasc., 1974, 13(4):335-341. |
Kerr and Staskin, “The Use of Artificial Material for Sling Surgery in the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence,” Female Urology, 1996, Raz (ed.), W.B. Saunders Company, Chapter 33, pp. 382-391. |
Kersey, “The gauze hammock sling operation in the treatment of stress incontinence,” Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1983, 90:945-949. |
Klinge et al., “Functional and Morphological Evaluation of a Low-Weight, Monofilament Polypropylene Mesh for Hernia Repair,” Journal of Biomedical Material Research, Jan. 24, 2002, pp. 129-137. |
Klinge, U. et al., “Influence of polyglactin-coating on functional and morphological parameters of polypropylene-mesh modifications for abnormal wall repair,” Biomaterials 20 (1999), pp. 613-623. |
Klinge, U. et al., “Modified Mesh for Hernia Repair that is Adapted to the Physiology of the Abdominal Wall,” Eur J Surg 164:951-960 (1998). |
Klinge, U. et al., “Pathophysiology of the abdominal wall,” Der Chirurg, (1996),67: 229-233. |
Klosterhalfen, B, et al., “Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair,” Biomaterials 19:2235-2246 (1998). |
Klosterhalfen, B. et al., “Morphological correlation of the functional mechanics of the abdominal wall after mesh implantation,” Langenbecks Arch Chir 382:87-94 (1997). |
Klutke et al., “The Anatomy of Stress Incontinence: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Female Bladder Neck and Urethra,” J. Urol., 1990, 143:563-566. |
Klutke et al., “Transvaginal Bladder Neck Suspension to Cooper's Ligament: A Modified Pereyra Procedure,” Obstet. Gynecol., 1996, 88:294-297. |
Korda et al., “Experience with Silastic Slings for Female Urinary Incontinence,” Aust. NZ J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1989, 29:150-154. |
Kovac and Cruikshank. Pubic bone suburethral stabilization sling: a long-term cure for SUI? Contemporary OB/GYN: Surgical Techniques, 43(2):52-76, 1998. |
Petros and Ulmsten, “Part III: Surgical Principles Deriving from the Theory,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1993, Suppl. 153:41-52. |
Petros and Ulmsten, “Part IV: Surgical Applications of the Theory—Development of the Intravaginal Sling Plasty (IVS) Procedure,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1993, Suppl. 153:53-54. |
Petros and Ulmsten, “Pinch Test for Diagnosis of Stress Urinary Incontinence,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1990, 69(Suppl.153):33-35. |
Petros and Ulmsten. An Integral Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1990, 69 (Suppl.153):7-31. |
Petros and Ulmsten. Pregnancy Effects on the Intravaginal Sling Operation. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 69(Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence) :77-78, 1990. |
Petros and Ulmsten. The Combined Intravaginal Sling and Tuck Operation. An Ambulatory Procedure for Cure of Stress and Urge Incontinence. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 69(Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence): 53-59, 1990. |
Petros and Ulmsten. The Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS II—(with bilateral “tucks”). Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory and its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence: 61-67, 1993. |
Petros and Ulmsten. The Free Graft Procedure for Cure of the Tethered Vagina Syndrome. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., Suppl. 153: 85-87, 1997. |
Petros and Ulmsten. The Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS IV—(with “double-breasted” unattached vaginal flap repair and “free” vaginal tapes). Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory and its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence: 73-79, 1993. |
Petros and Ulmsten. The Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS VI—Further Development of the “Double-Breasted” Vaginal Flap Repair—Attached Flap. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory and its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence: 81-84, 1993. |
Petros and Ulmsten. The Posterior Fornix Syndrome: A Multiple Symptom Complex of Pelvic Pain and Abnormal Urinary Symptoms Deriving from Laxity in the Posterior Fornix of Vagina. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory and its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence: 89-93, 1993. |
Petros and Ulmsten. The Role of a Lax Posterior Vaginal Fornix in the Causation of Stress and Urgency Symptoms: A Preliminary Report Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 69(Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence): 71-73, 1990. |
Petros and Ulmsten. The Tethered Vagina Syndrome, Post Surgical Incontinence and I-Plasty Operation for Cure. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 69(Suppl.153 An Integral Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence): 63-67, 1990. |
Petros and Ulmsten. The Tuck Procedure: A Simplified Vaginal Repair for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 69(Suppl.153 An Integral Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence): 41-42, 1990. |
Petros and Ulmsten. Urethral Pressure Increase on Effort Originates From Within the Urethra, and Continence From Musculovaginal Closure. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 14:337-350, 1995. |
Petros, Peter E., et al. The Autogenic Ligament Procedure: A Technique for Planned Formation of an Artificial Neo-Ligament. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 69(Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence):43-51, 1990. |
Petros. Development of Generic Models for Ambulatory Vaginal Surgery—A Preliminary Report. Int. Urogynecol. J., 9:19-27, 1998. |
Plaintiff Coloplast ,A/S's Opening Claim Construction Brief (Jan. 10, 2011) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV 10-227 BHS. |
Plaintiff Coloplast A/S's Answer to Defendant Generic Medical Devices, Inc.'s Counterclaims (Mar. 22, 2010) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV10-227 BHS. |
Plaintiff Coloplast A/S's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions (Jul. 6, 2010) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV '10-227 BHS. |
Plaintiff's Reply to Counterclaim (Mar. 30, 2004) Mentor Corporation v. American Medical Systems, Inc. (Civ. No. 04-1000). |
Product Monograph for Aris Transobturator Tape for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, 2004, 40 pages. |
Rackley, Raymond R., et al. Tension-free Vaginal Tape and Percutaneous Vaginal Tape Sling Procedures. Techniques in Urology, 7(2):90-100, 2001. |
Rackley, Raymond. Synthetic Slings: Five Steps for Successful Placement—Follow These Steps to Insert Transvaginal/Percutaneous Slings Using Vaginal Approach Alone. Urology Times, 28:46-49, 2000. |
Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, 2001. |
Raz, Shlomo, et al. The Raz Bladder Neck Suspension: Results in 206 Patients. The Journal of Urology: Urological Neurology and Urodynamics, 148:845-850, 1992. |
Raz, Shlomo. Modified Bladder Neck Suspension for Female Stress Incontinence. Urology, 17(1):82-85, 1981. |
Richardson, David A., et al. Delayed Reaction to the Dacron Buttress Used in Urethropexy. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 29(9):689-692, 1984. |
Ridley, John H. Appraisal of the Goebell-Frangenheim-Stoeckel Sling Procedure. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 95(5):714-721, 1966. |
Sand et al., “Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology vol. 184, Issue 7, pp. 1357-1364, Jun. 2001. |
Schettini, M. et al., “Abdominal sacral colpopexy with prolene mesh,” Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct (1999) 10(5): 259-299. |
Schumpelick, V. et at., “Minimized polypropylene mesh for preperitoneal net plasty (PNP) of incisional hernias,” Chirurg 70:422-430 (1999). |
Shaw, W., “An Operation for the Treatment of Stress Incontinence,” Br. Med. J. 1949:1070-1073. |
Sheiner et al., “An unusual complication of obturator foramen arterial bypass,” J. Cardiovasc. Surg., 1969, 10(4):324-328. |
Sirls and Leach, “Use of Fascia Lata for Pubovaginal Sling,” Female Urology, 1996, Raz (ed.). W.B. Saunders Company, Chapter 32, pp. 376-381. |
Sloan and Barwin, “Stress Incontinence of Urine: A Retrospective Study of the Complications and Late Results of Simple Suprapubic Suburethral Fascial Slings,” J. Urol., 1973, 110:533-536. |
Solyx™ SIS System, The Carrier Tip That Allows for Advanced Control, (Accessed: Feb. 28, 2011). |
Sottner et al. “New Single-Incision Sling System MiniArc™ in treatment of the female stress urinary incontinence” Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika [Online] 2010, 75(2), pp. 101-104. |
Spencer et al., “A Comparison of Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck with Suprapubic Vesicourethropexy for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence,” J. Urol., 1987, 137:411-415. |
Spinosa, JP et al., Transobturator surgery for female stress incontinence: a comparative anatomical study of outside-in vs. inside-out techniques, BJU Intl., 100(5), pp. 1097-1102 (Nov. 2007). |
Stamey, “Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck for Urinary Incontinence in Females,” Annals of Surgery, 1980, 192(4):465-471. |
Stanton, Stuart L. Suprapubic Approaches for Stress Incontinence in Women. The Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 38(3):348-351, 1990. |
Staskin et al., “The Gore-tex sling procedure for female sphincteric incontinence: indications, technique, and results,” World J. Urol., 1997, 15:295-299. |
Stothers et al., “Anterior Vaginal Wall Sling,” Female Urology, 1996, Raz (ed.), W.B. Saunders Company, Chapter 35, pp. 395-398. |
Supplemental European Search Report issued in EP Application No. 03751825, Jun. 19, 2009, 5 pages. |
Surgimesh Sling Treatment of Incontinence http://www.aspide.com Mar. 4, 2011. |
Ulmsten and Petros, “Intravaginal Slingplasty (IVS): An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1995, 29:75-82. |
Ulmsten et al., “A three-year follow up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence,” Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1999, 106:345-350. |
Ulmsten et al., “An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure Under Local Anesthesia for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence,” Int. Urogynecol. J., 1996, 7:81-86. |
Ulmsten et al., “Different Biochemical Composition of Connective Tissue in Continent and Stress Incontinent Women,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1987, 66:455-457. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180153672 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14740276 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 15883110 | US | |
Parent | 14151873 | Jan 2014 | US |
Child | 14740276 | US | |
Parent | 13402978 | Feb 2012 | US |
Child | 14151873 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12072901 | Feb 2008 | US |
Child | 13402978 | US |